failure modes effects analysis (fmea) six sigma continuous improvement training six sigma continuous...

28
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

Upload: kerrie-franklin

Post on 22-Dec-2015

232 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)Six Sigma Continuous Improvement TrainingSix Sigma Continuous Improvement Training

Six Sigma Simplicity

Page 2: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

ObjectivesObjectives

s Discuss what FMEA is fors Review how to use FMEAs Address steps involved in

constructing an FMEAs Using FMEA for risk assessment

s Discuss what FMEA is fors Review how to use FMEAs Address steps involved in

constructing an FMEAs Using FMEA for risk assessment

Page 3: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

3

What is FMEA?What is FMEA?s FMEA: Failure Modes Effects Analysis. A proactive,

preventative evaluation. s What does it do?

s Helps to evaluate how a process or design can fails Helps to quantify risk factors assisting in prioritizing

current or future potential projectss Can act as a forum for process or design

improvements and preventative actionss Assists in identifying weaknesses in current control

plans May lead to reduction in manufacturing costs to

improved design or set-up processes

s FMEA: Failure Modes Effects Analysis. A proactive, preventative evaluation.

s What does it do?s Helps to evaluate how a process or design can fails Helps to quantify risk factors assisting in prioritizing

current or future potential projectss Can act as a forum for process or design

improvements and preventative actionss Assists in identifying weaknesses in current control

plans May lead to reduction in manufacturing costs to

improved design or set-up processes

Page 4: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

Some Sources of Risk?Some Sources of Risk?

D. H. Stamatis, FMEA:FMEA from Theory to Practice, Quality Press,

1995

Total RiskVague

Workmanship Standards

Poor control plans & SOP’s

Raw Material Variation

Poorly developed Specification

LimitsMeasurement Variation (On- Floor and QC)

Machine Reliability/Poor

Process Capability

Potential Safety Hazards

Unclear Customer Expectations

Page 5: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

Types of FMEA?Types of FMEA?

s PFMEA --- Process or Potential Failure Modes Effects Analysis. May be used where a process needs to be evaluated for potential failures. May be a manufacturing or transactional process

s DFMEA --- Design Failure Modes Effects Analysis. Generally used in Research/Development where designs are analyzed for potential weaknesses

s SFMEA --- System Failure Modes Effects Analysis. Used to evaluate system issues that cross corporate functions

Page 6: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

Where Can FMEA Fit In?Where Can FMEA Fit In?

Process Mapping / Brown Paper

Project: Housing Welding

Date: 12/20/96

Ou

tpu

t

Va

ria

ble

s

Wid

th

Dim

en

sio

n

Len

gth

Dim

en

sio

n

Nu

gg

et

Siz

e

Fla

sh

Fre

e

All

We

lds

Pre

se

nt

Rank 5 7 9 8 10Inputs

1 Width Bracket 1 10

2 Length Bracket 1 7

3 Housing Width 7

4 Housing Length 10

5 All SOPs 9 9 9 6

6 Weld Schedule 10 10

7 Air Pressure 5 5 5

8 Line Voltage 5 5 5

9 H20 Circulation 5 5 5

10 Width Bracket 2 10

11 Length Bracket 2 7

12 Daily Tip Dressing 10 8

13

14

15

View Results

Delete

Instructions

DEMO

X-Y Matrix

350345340335330325320

USLLSL

Process Capability Analysis for Volume

PPM Total

PPM > USL

PPM < LSL

PPM Total

PPM > USL

PPM < LSL

PPM Total

PPM > USL

PPM < LSL

Ppk

PPL

PPU

Pp

Cpm

Cpk

CPL

CPU

Cp

StDev (Overall)

StDev (Within)

Sample N

Mean

LSL

Target

USL

452293.06

237546.24

214746.82

414406.23

218970.95

195435.28

450000.00

233333.33

216666.67

0.24

0.26

0.24

0.25

*

0.26

0.29

0.26

0.27

5.31817

4.89682

120

334.202

330.000

*

338.000

Exp. "Overall" PerformanceExp. "Within" PerformanceObserved PerformanceOverall Capability

Potential (Within) Capability

Process Data

Within

Overall

Initial Capability Study

#Process Function

(Step)

Potential Failure Modes (Process

Defects)

Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)

SEV

Clas

Potential Causes of Failure (KPIVs)

OCC

Current Process Controls

DET

RPN

1 Load Bracket 1 and housing into Fixture A

Parts do not fit Delay in process 2 Incoming component dimensions out of print

3 Receiving inspection (1% dimentional audit)

6 36

2 Part is loaded incorrectly

Final assembly width/length out of print

8 Operator error 5 100% final dim gauge/100% visual inspection

4 160

3 Fixture A: Initiate cycle start

Machine will not cycle

Delay in process 2 Power off, sensor out

2 1/month PM 7 28

4 Fixture A: Clamps Machine will not clamp

Delay in process 2 Air pressure low, sensor out

2 1/month PM 7 28

5 Delay in process 2 Part not loaded properly

2 Sensor installed (poke yoke)

2 8

6 Fixture A: Welds Machine will not weld

Delay in process 2 Not enough voltage supplied

1 Voltage regulator and visual alarm

2 4

7 Welds appear small or "light"

Airbag housing will not sustain deployment

10 Weld schedule out of adjustment

5 100% visual inspection, 2/shift destructive testing

4 200

8 Fixture A: Unclamps

Machine will not unclamp

Delay in process 2 Air pressure release valve broken

2 1/month PM 7 28

9 Remove and transport subassembly

Dropped/ damaged subassembly

Final assembly width/length out of print

8 Operator error 2 100% final dim gauge/100% visual inspection

4 64

FMEA

Page 7: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

When Do I Do an FMEA?When Do I Do an FMEA?

s They can begin as soon as a project is selected for a certain process, system or design

s First one usually started no later than Measure Phase, or beginning of the Analysis Phase

s FMEA document is a dynamic document

s Should be revised as improvements or changes made to a process

Page 8: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

Who Does an FMEA?Who Does an FMEA?s This is a team process. Team sizes may

vary, but recommended size is approximately 5-7 members.

s Depending upon the type of FMEA being done, members may come from:

s Research and Design Engineerss Manufacturing Supervisors, Manufacturing

Engineers, Manufacturing Operators (very important members)

s Quality Department Memberss Saless Marketings Testing or Validation Departments Human Resourcess Maintenances Supplier

Page 9: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

How to Do an FMEAHow to Do an FMEA1. For each Process Input, determine the ways in which the

input can fail (these are failure modes)2. For each failure mode associated with the inputs,

determine effects3. Identify potential causes of each failure mode4. List the current controls for each cause5. Define or adapt definitions of Severity, Occurrence and

Detection appropriate to what is being evaluated6. Assign Severity, Occurrence and Detection ratings to

each cause7. Calculate RPN (spreadsheet does it automatically)8. Determine recommended actions to reduce high RPN’s9. Take appropriate actions and document10. Update FMEA documents as appropriate11. Recalculate RPN’s

Page 10: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA DocumentFMEA Document

Page 11: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 1FMEA: Step 1s Process Function (or step) --- Refers to the function of a

process or step within a process. A manufacturing example might be “Drilling Holes,” and a transactional example, “Create Sales Orders.”

Sales creates quote/orders

Page 12: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 1 (cont’d)FMEA: Step 1 (cont’d)s Failure Mode --- the way a process input may fail. Can be

associated with a defect (in manufacturing) or a process input within a transactional process. A manufacturing example would be: “Wrong Hole Size” or a transactional example being, “Incorrect Information.”

Incorrect infoSales creates quote/order

Page 13: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 2FMEA: Step 2s Effect --- The impact on process or customer requirements.

This impact or result may be on a downstream process, the system, design or end-user customer. A manufacturing example may be, “Parts scrapped” and a transactional example could be, “Wrong person gets benefits”:

Customer does not receive product

Sales creates quote/order

Incorrect info

Customer receives incorrect product

Order cancelled

Page 14: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 3FMEA: Step 3s Cause --- Source of the failure mode.

Customer does not receive product

Sales creates quote/order

Incorrect info

Customer receives incorrect product

Customer changes mind

Type/operator

Customer gave wrong info

Customer gave wrong info

Part deviation

Page 15: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 4FMEA: Step 4s Current Process Controls --- Methods/devices in place to prevent

or detect failure modes or causes. Prevention consists of mistake-proofing, automated controls and set-up verifications. Controls consists of audits, checklists, Inspection, laboratory testing, training, SOP’s, preventive maintenance, etc.

Customer gave wrong info

Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs

billing address)

Quality review by random sampling

Page 16: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA Step 5: SeverityFMEA Step 5: Severitys Addresses how severe the failure mode and effect is to the

customer. Also may address safety concerns. See below:

• Also refer to the AIAG guidebook: Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reference Manual,

1995. Page 35. Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation.

Effect Criteria: Severity of Effect Defined Ranking

Hazardous: Without Warning

GRAVE SAFETY concern/ violation, Possible Injury/ Death to customer or employee10

Hazardous: With Warning Major Safety/ / Health/ Environmental concern and/ or may be illegal

9

Very High Render the product or service unfit for use

8

HighCause extreme Customer dissatisfaction.

7

ModerateResult in partial malfunction, major customer dissatisfaction i

6

LowCause a loss of performance likely to result in a complaint

5

Very Low Cause minor performance loss.

4

MinorCause a minor nuisance, can be overcome with no loss

3

Very MinorBe unnoticed, minor effect on performance

2

None Be unnoticed and not effect performance. 1

Page 17: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA Step 5: OccurrenceFMEA Step 5: Occurrences Addresses the frequency the failure mode occurs. See below:

* Also refer to the AIAG guidebook Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reference Manual, 1995. Page 39. Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation.

Guidelines for Failure Possible Failure Rates Probability Ranking

Very High: Failure is almost inevitable

> 30% 10

9

High: Generally associated with processes similar to previous

processes that have often failed.

£ 30%

£ 5% 8

£ 1% 7

Moderate: Generally associated with processes similar to previous processes that have experienced

occasional failures but not in major proportions

:

£ .03% 6

5

, . £ 6 per 10,000 4

Low: Isolated failures associated with similar processes.

£ 6 per million 3

Very Low: Only isolated failures associated with almost identical

processes £ 3 per 10 million 2

Remote: Failure is highly unlikely. No failures ever associated with

almost identical processes.

More than one per day

Once every 3 to 4 days

Once per week

Once per Month

Once every 3 months

Once every 6 months

Once a year

Once every 1 – 3 years

Once every 3 – 6 years

Once every 6 – 50 years £ 2 per billion 1

£ 1 per 10,000

Page 18: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA Step 5: DetectionFMEA Step 5: Detections Addresses the ability of methods or systems in place to detect the

failure if it occurs. See guidelines below:

* Also refer to AIAG guidebook Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reference Manual, 1995. Page 39. Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation.

Almost Impossible

Detection Criteria: Ranking

Defect caused by failure is not detectable. 10

Very Remote Occasional units are checked for defects. 9

Remote Units are systematically sampled and inspected. 8

Very Low All units are manually inspected. 7

Low Manual inspections with mistake-proofing. 6

Moderate Process is monitored (SPC) and manually inspected. 5

Moderately High SPC utilized with immediate reaction to out-of-control (OOC) condition.

4

High SPC (above) with 100% inspection (for OOC condition). 3

Very High All units are automatically inspected/ tested/ verified. 2

Almost Certain Defect is obvious and kept from affecting Customer. 1

Page 19: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA Step 5: Additional InformationFMEA Step 5: Additional Information

s One thing that will save a lot of time is if the Black Belt defines the scales and definitions previous to the FMEA meeting

s Scales do not have to be 1-10. They may also be 1, 3, 7, 10 or similar scale

s Additional characteristics may be factored into the RPN. For example, one Black Belt added an “Impact” characteristic. The intent was to quantify the impact to the process

Page 20: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 6FMEA: Step 6s We could put the following scores for the

information we had below:

Customer does not receive product

Type/operator

Customer gave wrong info

Customer gave wrong info

34

4

4

2

2

2

4

2Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs

billing address)

Quality review by random sampling

Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs

billing address)

Page 21: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 7FMEA: Step 7

s Risk Priority Number (RPN) --- The risk priority number allows the team to quantify various failure modes to assist in prioritizing the team’s improvement efforts. The RPN is the product of:

Severity x Occurrence x Detection The value of each of these characteristics is determined by the team.

s The higher the RPN, the higher priority the potential failure mode becomes. Prevention becomes the focus of the team

s Risk Priority Number (RPN) --- The risk priority number allows the team to quantify various failure modes to assist in prioritizing the team’s improvement efforts. The RPN is the product of:

Severity x Occurrence x Detection The value of each of these characteristics is determined by the team.

s The higher the RPN, the higher priority the potential failure mode becomes. Prevention becomes the focus of the team

Let’s Look at Each Characteristic

Page 22: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 7FMEA: Step 7s We could put the following scores for the

information we had below:

Customer does not receive product

Type/operator

Customer gave wrong info

Customer gave wrong info

34

4

4

2

2

2

4

2Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs

billing address)

Quality review by random sampling

16

32

24

We Get An RPN =4X2X2= 16

Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs

billing address)

Page 23: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Before ActionsFMEA: Before Actions

122Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs billing

address)

3Operator error2

82Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs billing

address)

2Customer gave wrong info

(credit card)

2Order delayed

162Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs billing address)

2Wrong address4Order not deliverable

605Pre-production report4Part has EOL/leadtime

increased

3Order cancelled

41Call customer1Part deviation4

605Verify order with customer3Customer changes mind

4Customer receives incorrect

product

484Quality review by random sampling

3Type/operator4

24Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs billing address)

23Type/operator4

324Quality review by random sampling

2Customer gave wrong info

4

162Repeat/verify info with customer (shipping vs billing

address)

2Customer gave wrong info

4Customer does not receive

product

Incorrect info

Sales creates

quote/order

RPNDET

Current Controls

OCC

Causes of Failure (X’s)

SEV

Failure Effects

Failure Mode

Process Function

Page 24: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 8FMEA: Step 8s Recommended Actions --- Actions that are decided on by the

team that will eliminate, reduce the impact or prevent the failure mode from occurring.

Customer gave wrong info 2 4Quality review by

random sampling 32 Confirm Customer Requirement

before issue order

Page 25: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 9FMEA: Step 9s Responsible Person & Target Date --- Actions have a much better

rate of completion when they are assigned a person with an expected date of completion. Once completed, update the FMEA form and fill out the “Taken Action” field.

R. Day 12-Dec-02

Customer gave wrong info 2 4Quality review by

random sampling 32Confirm Customer

Requirement before issue order

Page 26: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

FMEA: Step 10 and 11FMEA: Step 10 and 11

10. Update FMEA documents as appropriate11. Re-assign the re-assign Severity, Occurrence and

Detection ratings. Then Recalculate RPN’s

R. Day 12-Dec-02

4Quality review by random sampling 32 Confirm Customer

Requirement before issue order

As recommend Actions 4 1 2 8

Page 27: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

s Break into your designated groups. s Use the XY matrix created during the last

module.s Using the methodology you have learned today,

create a preliminary FMEA for two steps from the in-class project.

s You have 30 minutes for this exercise.s Be prepared to report your results to the class.

In Class ExerciseIn Class Exercise

Page 28: Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity

Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)Six Sigma Continuous Improvement TrainingSix Sigma Continuous Improvement Training