faith & reason: kierkegaard, clifford, & aquinas ~ slide 1 kierkegaard & fideism...
TRANSCRIPT
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 1
Kierkegaard & Fideism
Fideism – The position that religious belief-systems
are not subject to rational evaluation (Michael Peterson et al, Reason & Religious Belief: an Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, 2nd ed. (NY: Oxford UP, 1998) 49).
– Søren Kierkegaard (Danish, 1813-1855)• Two ways of knowing
–Objective–Subjective
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 2
Kierkegaard & Fideism
• Which is appropriate for religious faith?
• Religious truth: “the venture which chooses an objective uncertainty with passion of the infinite” (982nd).
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 3
– drawing of Kierkegaard
– by his 2nd cousin, Niels Christian Kierkegaard
– c. 1840– Royal Library,
Copenhagen
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 4
Kierkegaard & Fideism
•Faith & risk & dread•Faith & the absurd
– Critical evaluation of Fideism•How does one decide which
religious faith to jump to? (James Jone’s People’s Temple, Jonestown, Guyana, 1978)
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 5
Kierkegaard & Fideism
•How does one arbitrate conflicts between a religious belief-system & science?
•The value of Fideism: religious faith is more than assent to cognitive claims; involves passion & trust & relationship with a person
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 6
Clifford’s strong rationalism
Strong rationalism - the position that “in order for a religious belief-system to be properly and rationally accepted, it must be possible to prove that the belief-system is true” (Peterson et al 45).
– William Clifford (English, 1845-1879)• Story about ship owner
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 7
Clifford’s strong rationalism
• Conclusion: The ship owner had “no right to believe on such evidence as was before him” & it was morally wrong for him to believe that it was safe to sail (Peterson 802nd).
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 8
Clifford’s strong rationalism
• Clifford anticipates some objections– The actions were immoral, not the
beliefs.– Clifford’s response: Belief & action
cannot be separated; beliefs often, almost always, spill over into action• Hence all beliefs have a social
dimension; they affect the lives of others.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 9
Clifford’s strong rationalism
• This is why beliefs may be morally good or bad.
– Therefore one has a moral obligation to accept only those beliefs based on evidence & careful reasoning (Peterson 842nd).
– If evidence is lacking, one should withhold belief.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 10
Clifford’s strong rationalism
– Application of his position to religion?
• Critique of Clifford’s position– One may make an intellectual
mistake & not be morally wrong for making such a mistake. • There is a difference between
an intellectual mistake & a moral evil.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 11
Clifford’s strong rationalism
– We often must act without sufficient knowledge (e.g., practice of medicine).
– In his tacit application of his position to religion, he assumes that religious faith is a leap beyond reason & evidence. • John Polkinghorne: “You don’t
have to commit intellectual suicide to be a person of religious faith.”
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 12
Critical rationalism
Critical rationalism - the position that “religious belief-systems can and must be rationally criticized and evaluated although conclusive proof is such a system is impossible” (Peterson et al 53).
– Cover Ibn Rushd here
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 13
Aquinas on faith & reason
– Aquinas (Italian, 1225-1274)• Two kinds of
propositions about God
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 14
Aquinas on faith & reason
• Arguments for the appropriateness that although truths about God are available through human reason, these same truths are also available through revelation (reason & revelation)
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 15
Aquinas on faith & reason
– 1. The pragmatic argument– 2. Argument based on the frailty of
human reason•Arguments for the appropriateness that there are some truths about God which are beyond human reason (revelation only)– [1. Argument based on the
satisfaction of the transcendent nature of humans]
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 16
Aquinas on faith & reason
– 2. Argument for richness of our knowledge of God
– 3. Argument for plausibility that knowledge of God would be beyond the abilities of human reason
•On the relationship between religious faith & reason: the harmony position (Peterson et al 712nd)– Principle vs practice
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 17
Aquinas on faith & reason
•Concluding overview of Aquinas’s position– 1. Faith precedes reason– 2. Reason alone cannot arrive at
many of the propositions of religious faith; but once these propositions are available (by revelation), reason can show that they are reasonable.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 18
Aquinas on faith & reason
–3. Religious faith is partly proposition; it makes truth-claims
–4. In principle, religious faith & reason are in harmony.
–5. In practice, they may conflict but when they do, reason must be wrong.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 19
Aquinas on faith & reason
– Critique of Aquinas• On # 5, in view of our 20th
century awareness of the historicity of the development of dogma & of the interpretation of scripture, why not say that in cases of conflict, both religious faith & reason must reassess their positions?
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 20
Assessment of critical rationalism
– Concluding comments on critical rationalism in general• Religious belief-systems are
worldviews. • Worldviews are very complex – include
metaphysics, epistemology, & ethics. • Thus they are difficult to critically
evaluate. • But it is possible.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 21
Assessment of critical rationalism
• Some of the standards which may be used– internal & external consistency– explanatory power (does it offer
a comprehensive view which is illuminating?)
– agreement with experience – it offer a coherence unity
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 22
Assessment of critical rationalism
– does it help us make sense of the actual living of our lives?
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 23
Assessment of critical rationalism
•Finally, critical rationalism, since it holds that conclusive proof is never possible with respect to religious belief-systems, involves, as Kierkegaard claims, commitment which goes beyond pure rationality; it involves entrusting ourselves to something that goes beyond what we have conclusive proof for.