fasb update - wordpress.com€¦ · fasb update ©2018 cliftonlarsonallen llp agenda . 2...
TRANSCRIPT
WEALTH ADVISORY | OUTSOURCING | AUDIT, TAX, AND CONSULTING Investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLC, an SEC-registered investment advisor
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
FASB Update
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Agenda
2
Presentation of Financial Statements of NFP Entities
Grants and Contracts to NFP Entities
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Not-for-Profit Section
Key Areas Affected
Key Changes in ASU
2016-14
Net Assets Classes
Liquidity & Availability
Expense Reporting
Investment Return
Statement of Cash Flows
4
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Net Assets
5
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Balance Sheet Presentation
6
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Adjustments Upon Adoption • Reclassify “unrestricted net assets” to “net assets without donor restrictions” • Reclassify “temporarily restricted” and “permanently restricted net assets” to “net assets with donor
restrictions” • Reclassify any “unrestricted net assets” related to underwater endowments to “net assets with donor
restrictions” • Reclassify any “temporarily restricted net assets” related to implied restrictions on contributions restricted for
acquisition or construction of PP&E to “net assets without donor restrictions” (to adopt placed-in service approach)
7
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Sample Reclassifications
8
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Statement of Activities Presentation EXAMPLE 1
9
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Statement of Activities Presentation EXAMPLE 2
10
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP Statement of Activities Presentation
EXAMPLE 3*
* GAAP still allows flexibility in presentation of NFP financials, examples in slide deck are not all inclusive
11
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Board-designated Net Assets Presentation May disclose on the face of the statement of financial position or in the notes
Could present in narrative or tabular form in the note.
Net Assets Without donor restrictions
Undesignated 3,057,607 Designated by the Board for operating reserve 300,000 Designated by the Board for endowment 15,511,186 Invested in property and equipment, net of related debt 21,150,885
40,019,678
12
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Operating Measure Considerations
13
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Liquidity and Availability
14
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Liquidity/ Availability Disclosure, Example 1 Liquidity and Availability Financial assets available for general expenditure, that is, without donor or other restrictions limiting their use, within one year of the balance sheet date, comprise the following:
Our endowment funds consist of donor-restricted endowments and funds designated by the board as endowments. Income from donor-restricted endowments is restricted for specific purposes, with the exception of the amounts available for general use. Donor-restricted endowment funds are not available for general expenditure. Our board-designated endowment of $15,511,186 is subject to an annual spending rate of 4.5 percent as described in Note 9. Although we do not intend to spend from this board-designated endowment (other than amounts appropriated for general expenditure as part of our Board’s annual budget approval and appropriation), these amounts could be made available if necessary. As part of our liquidity management plan, we invest cash in excess of daily requirements in short-term investments, CDs, and money market funds. Occasionally, the Board designates a portion of any operating surplus to its operating reserve, which was $300,000 as of December 31, 201X.
Cash and cash equivalents 4,851,231$ Operating investments 723,006 Accounts receivable 312,216 Promises to give 985,846 Distributions from assets held under split-interest agreements 145,000 Distributions from beneficial interests in assets held by others 180,110 Endowment spending-rate distributions and appropriations 1,115,664
8,313,073$
15
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Liquidity/ Availability Disclosure, Example 2
16
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP Example – NFP with Deficiency in the Composition of
Assets to Comply with Donor-Imposed Restrictions * Donations restricted for purposes more limited than general expenditures total $3,750.
Codification references: 958-210-50-2 An NFP shall disclose the following, if applicable, in the notes to the financial statements and may include that information in qualitative disclosures on the availability of an NFP’s financial assets in accordance with paragraph 958-210-50-1A(b): b. The fact that the NFP has not maintained appropriate amounts of cash and cash equivalents to comply with donor-imposed restrictions (see paragraph 958-450-50-3)
958-450-50-3 If the noncompliance results from a not-for-profit entity’s (NFP’s) failure to maintain an appropriate composition of assets in amounts needed to comply with all donor restrictions, the amounts and circumstances shall be disclosed.
17
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Expense Reporting
Where to Report?
Statement of Functional Expenses
Statement of Activities
Notes to Financial Statements
Do not report as supplementary information
Describe allocation methods used
Report expenses by function and nature in one place
18
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Expense Reporting (cont’d.)
19
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example 1 Analysis of Expenses Presentation in the notes or a separate statement
20
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP Example 2
Analysis of Expenses Presentation on the face of the statement of activities
21
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Reporting of Investment Return
22
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Reporting of Investment Return - Examples • Direct internal investment expenses involve the direct conduct or direct
supervision of the strategic and tactical activities involved in generating investment return. The following are some examples:
– CIO’s Compensation: Potentially all of expense
– CFO’s Compensation: Potentially a partial allocation of expense
– Investment Accountant’s Compensation: Potentially a partial allocation of expense
– CIO’s Travel Expenses to Visit Fund Managers: Potentially all of expense
– Accountant Performing Endowment Allocations: None
23
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Incentive to Use Direct Method for Cash Flow Statement
Direct
Indirect
24
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Grants and Contracts to NFP Entities (Improving the Scope and Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made)
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Timeline of the Project
Issued Proposed Update
November 1, 2017
Final ASU Comment Period
Deadline
Q2 2018 August 3, 2017
26
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Scope • Applies to all entities (NFPs and business entities) that receive or make
contributions unless otherwise indicated. • Excludes transfers of assets from the government to business entities. • Applies to both contributions received by a recipient and contributions made by a
resource provider. The intent is simply that both apply the same guidance, the entities do not need to track each other’s accounting to achieve the same reporting results.
27
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Why This Upcoming ASU Is Necessary
To address difficulty and diversity in practice among NFPs in:
Characterizing grants and similar contracts with government agencies and others as (i) reciprocal transactions (exchanges) or (ii) nonreciprocal transactions (contributions)
Distinguishing between conditional and unconditional contributions
Issue 1
Issue 2
28
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Issue 1: Grants and Contracts – Reciprocal vs Nonreciprocal (Exchange vs Nonexchange) • Many NFPs treat governmental grants/contracts as exchange transactions without regard to
the substance of the agreement
• Some equate the government with the general public, i.e., the government is merely “purchasing” benefits for taxpayers that it would otherwise have to provide itself
– The underlying issue is whether the government receives direct commensurate value in return because the public benefits
• Many believe the government doesn’t make “contributions,” i.e., it is not within the government’s purview to make philanthropic decisions or make contributions using taxpayer monies
29
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Issue 2: Contributions – Conditional vs Unconditional
• Stakeholders find it difficult to distinguish between conditional and unconditional contributions – Especially when funds are provided with certain outcome stipulations, but no specified
return policy.
• Diversity exists in the application of the “remote” notion – Whether the likelihood of failing to meet a condition is remote
◊ Some NFPs believe that any condition within their control has a remote likelihood of not being met; other NFPs believe that administrative or other trivial “conditions” prevent recognition until satisfied
30
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Issue 1: Who Receives the Benefit?
Current Practice
Exchange
Direct commensurate
value to resource provider
Specified third parties
General public
Proposed Clarification
Exchange Follow Topic 606 (or other, such as
Leases)
Direct commensurate
value to resource provider
Specified third parties
Government/ resource provider is a 3rd party payer
on behalf of an identified customer
Nonexchange Follow Topic
958-605
Specified third parties
Continue to monitor GASB
and IPSASB projects in this
area
General public
*The revenue recognized would be the underlying contract’s patient service revenue, tuition revenue, etc.
**A focus on whether or not there is a “performance obligation” possibly could include some contracts where the general public is the primary beneficiary
31
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Reciprocal vs Nonreciprocal – Key Clarifications
• “Resource provider” is NOT synonymous with “General public”
– A resource provider includes governmental entities, private foundations and others
– Indirect benefit received by the public is not equivalent to commensurate value received by the resource provider
– Indirect benefit received by a resource provider in providing a societal benefit is not equivalent to commensurate value received by the resource provider
– Furthering a resource provider's mission or positive sentiment from acting as a donor does not constitute commensurate value received by the resource provider
32
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Reciprocal vs Nonreciprocal – Key Clarifications
• The type of resource provider should not override the substance of the transaction
• If the primary beneficiary of a grant or contract is a 3rd party, an NFP must use judgment to determine if the transaction is reciprocal or nonreciprocal
33
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Issue 2: Conditional vs. Unconditional Contributions For a Donor-Imposed Condition to Exist:
34
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Indicators to Determine a Barrier
*During redeliberations, the Board decided to make additional clarifications to each indicator
35
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
When to Recognize Revenue/Expense? Recipients • When the contribution is no longer conditional
– No longer a right of return or release – No longer a barrier
• Funds received in advance would be recorded as a liability in the recipient’s books
Donors • Contributions made generally should be recognized by the donor at the same time the done
recognizes the contribution received – Donor does not recognize until the contribution has become unconditional – Donor follows the same determination criteria as donee
36
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example #1: Grant from Federal Government • NFP A is awarded a grant from the federal government. • The agreement requires NFP A to:
• Follow the rules and regulations established by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
• Incur certain expenses (or costs) in compliance with rules and regulations established by the OMB and the federal awarding agency
• Obtain an annual audit in accordance with OMB guidelines • Submit a summary of research findings to the federal government
Any unused assets are forfeited, and any unallowed costs that have been drawn down by NFP A are required to be refunded.
• NFP A retains the rights to the findings. • Is this transaction exchange or nonexchange? If nonexchange, is it conditional or
unconditional?
37
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example #1: Conclusion
• NFP A concludes this is a nonexchange transaction (nonreciprocal).
• Explanation: • Commensurate value is not being exchanged between the two parties • NFP A retains all the rights to the research and findings and received
the primary benefit of the findings • The federal government’s benefit is considered indirect because the
research and findings serve the general public.
38
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example #1: Conclusion, continued
• NFP A determines that it should account for this grant as conditional.
• Explanation: • The grant agreement limits NFP A’s discretion as a result of the
specific requirements on how the assets may be spent (qualifying expenses)
• There is a right of return and release • The audit requirement alone is not a barrier to entitlement because it
is not related to the purpose of the agreement
39
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example #2: Grant from a Private Foundation • NFP B receives a grant from a private foundation for funding in the
amount of $400,000 to provide specific career training to disabled veterans.
• The grant requires NFP B to provide training to at least 8,000 disabled veterans during the next fiscal year, with specific minimum targets that must be met each quarter.
• There is a right of release from the obligation in the agreement. • Is this transaction exchange or nonexchange? If nonexchange, is it
conditional or unconditional?
40
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example #2: Conclusion
• NFP B determines that it should account for this grant as non-exchange and conditional.
• Explanation: • The foundation does not receive commensurate value in return • The agreement contains a right of release from obligation • The foundation requires NFP B to achieve a specific level of service
that would be considered a measurable performance-related barrier
41
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example #3: Pledge from an Individual • University C receives a multi-year pledge from a wealthy individual to
build a new “green” building on a college campus. The pledge is for $20 million payable over 3 years. – $7 million is payable up front on July 1, 2018 with no associated
conditions. – A second payment of $6 million is entitled and payable on July 1, 2019
upon evidence that the land was cleared, an architectural design was received, and proper building permits were obtained.
– A third payment of $7 million is entitled and payable upon receipt of a certificate of occupancy.
• Is this transaction exchange or nonexchange? If nonexchange, is it conditional or unconditional?
42
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Example #3: Conclusion • University C determines that it should account for this transaction as
nonexchange and bifurcates the total pledge. $7 million is unconditional, and $13 million is conditional.
• Explanation: – The wealthy individual is not receiving commensurate value for the $20
million transferred – University C will receive the initial $7 million payment without having to
satisfy any conditions – University C will not be entitled to or receive either of the remaining $13
million in payments unless it overcomes their respective performance barriers, demonstrating the wealthy individual’s right of release from obligation if the barriers are not met
43
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
NFP Revenue Recognition Decision Process
Resource providers would apply a similar
decision making process for
recognizing expenses.
*Includes third-party payments on behalf of identified customers. These do not create new revenue.
44
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Likely Impact on Funding from…
Government Agencies
Individuals & Corporations Foundations
45
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Transition Approach • Modified Prospective
– Apply to all agreements:
o Existing at the effective date (only apply to the portion of existing agreements not previously recognized)
o Entered into after the effective date
• No restatement of prior amounts recognized
• Retrospective Application Permitted
46
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
Effective Date
*The effective date is the same as the new Revenue Recognition standard (Topic 606) for recipients, and allows for early implementation.
47
twitter.com/CLAconnect facebook.com/ cliftonlarsonallen
linkedin.com/company/ cliftonlarsonallen
©20
18 C
lifto
nLar
sonA
llen
LLP
CLAconnect.com
youtube.com/CliftonLarsonAllen
Thank you! Jeanette Ramos, CPA Signing Director, CLA Jeanette. [email protected] (602) 602-3642