feb ’02, trt meetings jack fowler – duke university sem analysis of wire from aging test #5 jack...
TRANSCRIPT
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler – Duke University
SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5
Jack Fowler
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Module Test Layout
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire Samples Analyzed
Xe-CO2 gas volume Wire 11 – Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 12 – Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 14 – Production wire with glass joint
Xe-CF4-CO2 gas volume Wire 16 – Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 18 - Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 20 – Pre Series 1 (.3 to .4 m) with PEEK joint Wire 24 - Production wire with glass encapsulated joint
Wire analysis Performed at Analytical Instrumentation Facility at North Carolina State University
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 11 Segment 1
Very small pores Fine scratches No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 11 Segment 3
Very small pores Fine scratches No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 11 Segment 4
Very small pores Fine scratches No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 11 Segment 5
Very small pores More scratches,
these are probably made during production
No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 11 Segment 5 Close up
Medium size pores ~0.25 m, more densely populated than upstream
No deposits Grain boundary
very defined
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 12 Segment 5
Very small pores One large scratch
that does not appear to have compromised the wire
No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 12 Segment 6
Very small pores Many scratches,
probably made in production
No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 12 Segment 6 Close Up
Very small pores Fine scratches,
wire has not been compromised
No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 12 Segment 7
Very small pores Few scratches No deposits Some surface
contamination
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 12 Segment 7 Close Up
Very small pores Small scratch No deposits Defect in gold
plating does not appear to have enlarged
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 1
Very small pores One large scratch
along top surface No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 2
Very small pores One scratch along
center, appears the same as the rest of the surface
Some small white deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 3
Many pores of all sizes
Surface is covered with deposits, analysis indicates they are Au
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 3 Close Up
Note how the deposits seem to be in clusters
Again the elemental analysis indicates only Au
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 4 in CWS
Wire appears very clean and undamaged
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 4 beside CWS
Wire surface appears smooth
Many large white deposits.
These show up as Au, C, O and F.
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 4 Surface Analysis
This is the elemental analysis of the dark areas around the deposits
Note the C and F peaks. The C is greater than the F.
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 4 Surface Analysis
This is a elemental analysis of the white deposits
Note the C and F peaks have become equal
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 4 Close Up
Here is a close up of the gold damage
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 4 Epoxy
This shows the region where the epoxy meets the wire.
The epoxy is covered with deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 4 Epoxy Surface Analysis
Note the large F and C peaks on the surface of the Epoxy.
Note also the absence of Au
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 5
Many pores of all sizes
Surface is covered with deposits, the analysis indicated Au
Also note dark appearance of surface
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 5 Close Up
Many pores of all sizes
Note the grain boundaries have lost their definition
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 6
Many pores of all sizes
Surface is covered with deposits, Au only
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 16 Segment 6
Note that the large scratch does not appear to have been damaged more than the rest of the surface
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 7
Many pores of all sizes
Surface deposits have drastically reduced
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 24 Segment 7 Close Up
Many pores of all sizes
Note the pores occur on the grain boundaries
Surface deposits have drastically reduced
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 20 Segment 1
Surface appears normal
Light scratches No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 20 Segment 3
Wire is still in good condition
Fine pores No scratches No deposits
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 20 Segment 4
Heavy damage of gold plating
Large deposits Analysis indicates
the deposits are mainly Au
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 20 Segment 4
Heavy damage to wire
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 20 Segment 4
Wire coming out of wire joint
Surface of the wire shows heavy deposits
The PEEK appears undamaged
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Wire 20 Segment 5
Many pores Heavy deposits These deposits
contained Au and W
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Summary
It is clear that the wire is damaged Xe-CO2 wire only exhibit small pores on surface
Xe-CF4-CO2 wires show heavy damage, both Au removal and deposits
It appears that the damage increases in the high radiation areas and as you move downstream in the straw
Thicker Au plating protects the wire longer There is fluorine detected on the surface of the wire We detected no silicon on the surface
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
To Do
Inspect incoming wire for pores We have never seen these pores on unused wire
Confirmation of the test results This should be done when IU gets their test results
Evaluate the possibility of water being trapped on surface, that may accelerate the damage
Evaluate differences from earlier tests
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Thin Plating Comparison
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
What are the Deposits? Si or Au
Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP
Surface Damage