feb ’02, trt meetings jack fowler – duke university sem analysis of wire from aging test #5 jack...

41
Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Upload: louisa-mitchell

Post on 17-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler – Duke University

SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5

Jack Fowler

Page 2: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Module Test Layout

Page 3: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire Samples Analyzed

Xe-CO2 gas volume Wire 11 – Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 12 – Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 14 – Production wire with glass joint

Xe-CF4-CO2 gas volume Wire 16 – Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 18 - Production wire with glass encapsulated joint Wire 20 – Pre Series 1 (.3 to .4 m) with PEEK joint Wire 24 - Production wire with glass encapsulated joint

Wire analysis Performed at Analytical Instrumentation Facility at North Carolina State University

Page 4: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 11 Segment 1

Very small pores Fine scratches No deposits

Page 5: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 11 Segment 3

Very small pores Fine scratches No deposits

Page 6: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 11 Segment 4

Very small pores Fine scratches No deposits

Page 7: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 11 Segment 5

Very small pores More scratches,

these are probably made during production

No deposits

Page 8: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 11 Segment 5 Close up

Medium size pores ~0.25 m, more densely populated than upstream

No deposits Grain boundary

very defined

Page 9: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 12 Segment 5

Very small pores One large scratch

that does not appear to have compromised the wire

No deposits

Page 10: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 12 Segment 6

Very small pores Many scratches,

probably made in production

No deposits

Page 11: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 12 Segment 6 Close Up

Very small pores Fine scratches,

wire has not been compromised

No deposits

Page 12: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 12 Segment 7

Very small pores Few scratches No deposits Some surface

contamination

Page 13: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 12 Segment 7 Close Up

Very small pores Small scratch No deposits Defect in gold

plating does not appear to have enlarged

Page 14: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 1

Very small pores One large scratch

along top surface No deposits

Page 15: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 2

Very small pores One scratch along

center, appears the same as the rest of the surface

Some small white deposits

Page 16: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 3

Many pores of all sizes

Surface is covered with deposits, analysis indicates they are Au

Page 17: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 3 Close Up

Note how the deposits seem to be in clusters

Again the elemental analysis indicates only Au

Page 18: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 4 in CWS

Wire appears very clean and undamaged

Page 19: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 4 beside CWS

Wire surface appears smooth

Many large white deposits.

These show up as Au, C, O and F.

Page 20: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 4 Surface Analysis

This is the elemental analysis of the dark areas around the deposits

Note the C and F peaks. The C is greater than the F.

Page 21: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 4 Surface Analysis

This is a elemental analysis of the white deposits

Note the C and F peaks have become equal

Page 22: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 4 Close Up

Here is a close up of the gold damage

Page 23: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 4 Epoxy

This shows the region where the epoxy meets the wire.

The epoxy is covered with deposits

Page 24: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 4 Epoxy Surface Analysis

Note the large F and C peaks on the surface of the Epoxy.

Note also the absence of Au

Page 25: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 5

Many pores of all sizes

Surface is covered with deposits, the analysis indicated Au

Also note dark appearance of surface

Page 26: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 5 Close Up

Many pores of all sizes

Note the grain boundaries have lost their definition

Page 27: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 6

Many pores of all sizes

Surface is covered with deposits, Au only

Page 28: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 16 Segment 6

Note that the large scratch does not appear to have been damaged more than the rest of the surface

Page 29: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 7

Many pores of all sizes

Surface deposits have drastically reduced

Page 30: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 24 Segment 7 Close Up

Many pores of all sizes

Note the pores occur on the grain boundaries

Surface deposits have drastically reduced

Page 31: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 20 Segment 1

Surface appears normal

Light scratches No deposits

Page 32: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 20 Segment 3

Wire is still in good condition

Fine pores No scratches No deposits

Page 33: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 20 Segment 4

Heavy damage of gold plating

Large deposits Analysis indicates

the deposits are mainly Au

Page 34: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 20 Segment 4

Heavy damage to wire

Page 35: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 20 Segment 4

Wire coming out of wire joint

Surface of the wire shows heavy deposits

The PEEK appears undamaged

Page 36: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Wire 20 Segment 5

Many pores Heavy deposits These deposits

contained Au and W

Page 37: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Summary

It is clear that the wire is damaged Xe-CO2 wire only exhibit small pores on surface

Xe-CF4-CO2 wires show heavy damage, both Au removal and deposits

It appears that the damage increases in the high radiation areas and as you move downstream in the straw

Thicker Au plating protects the wire longer There is fluorine detected on the surface of the wire We detected no silicon on the surface

Page 38: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

To Do

Inspect incoming wire for pores We have never seen these pores on unused wire

Confirmation of the test results This should be done when IU gets their test results

Evaluate the possibility of water being trapped on surface, that may accelerate the damage

Evaluate differences from earlier tests

Page 39: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Thin Plating Comparison

Page 40: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

What are the Deposits? Si or Au

Page 41: Feb ’02, TRT Meetings Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #5 Jack Fowler

Feb ’02, TRT MeetingsJack Fowler, Duke HEP

Surface Damage