feb - council workshop budget presentation final budget/feb...2015 operating budget – property tax...
TRANSCRIPT
11
2015 Budget
Council Workshop
February 2, 2015
2
Agenda
• Opening Remarks
• Response to Auditor General’s Report
• Budget Themes and Priorities
• Response to CD Howe
• 2015 Operating Budget Overview
• Level of detail required for budget deliberations
• Municipal service delivery – funding
• Property Tax Bills
• Drivers, pressures, relief
• 2015 Operating Budget – Property Tax Impact
3
Agenda
• Capital Program
• 2015 Capital Budget methodology
• Status of Capital Program
• Community Engagement and Communications Costs
• Community Grant Making
• Follow-up discussion from January 27 workshop
44
Response to Auditor
General’s Report
“Financial Review of the City of Brampton”January 26, 2015
5
Auditor General’s Report
• Address “Financial Review of the City of Brampton” by Jim McCarter (January 26, 2015)
• Discretionary reserve funds
• Maintaining infrastructure in a state of good repair
• Managing the rate of growth of operating expenses
6
Capital Reserve Funds
Payments to Contractors
Make payments to contractors from bank account as work is performed
Chequing / Savings Account
Put money into savings account
Personal Line of Credit
Draw from LOC to pay for renovations
Illustration: Home Renovations vs. City of Brampton Capital Program
Payments to Vendors
Make payments to vendors (designers, contractors, etc.) as work is performed
Unspent Capital
Allocate funds to capital projects
Reserve Funds
Draw from reserves to pay for capital projects
7
Maintaining Infrastructure
$543.2M
62% 62% 62%63%
63%63%
64%64%
65%65%
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
($M
illio
ns)
Budget Year
Infrastructure Levy (1%) Federal Gas Tax
Contribution to Capital Annual Depreciation Expense (Est.)
Total Contribution
8
Growth of Operating Expenses
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Brampton Full-Time Staffing Levels in Relation to Population
Population Full-time positions
2010: Introductionof Zum Bus Rapid
Transit (BRT)
* 2014 staffing number estimated based on approved additions
1994 - 2000: No tax increases =
reduced service levels
9
Budget Themes and Priorities
Potential Themes
• City-building
• Community facilities
• Maintaining infrastructure
• Managing growth
• Fiscal sustainability
1010
Transition to full accrual budgeting
• Existing budget method only includes annual cash (operating expenses) requirements
• Full accrual budgeting must include non-cash requirements (as on financial statements), such as:
• Depreciation
• Developer contributed assets
• Public Service Accounting Board (PSAB) adjustments for employee post retirement and other liabilities
• Interest earned on reserve and reserve funds
• This approach will provide stakeholders with a better reflection of the long-term financial health of the municipality for decision making purposes.
Response to CD Howe
11
Budget Variances – Two Views: CD Howe & Brampton
11
($ millions) Budget Actual Variance $ Variance %
Total revenues 626,377 732,994 106,617 17.0%
Items not included in budget
Developer contributed assets 80,681
Interest earned in reserves 8,373
Budgeted revenues 626,377 643,940 17,563 2.8%
Total expenses 450,655 550,176 99,521 22.1%
Item not included in budget
Depreciation 101,371
Budgeted expenses 450,655 448,805 (1,850) -0.4%
Source: City of Brampton 2012 Annual Financial Statements
--
--
--
1212
2015 Operating Budget
Overview
13
Level of Detail Required for Budget Deliberations
• 4 Levels of reporting available
• High level summary method
• Current method
• Line-by-line method
• Current method plus line-by-line for Mayor and Council
14
Municipal Service Delivery – Funding
Property Taxes & User Fees
• Fire Services• Public Transit• Planning New Developments• Enhancing Existing Neighbourhoods• Economic Development• Parks and Recreation• Arts and Culture• Road Maintenance• Snow Removal• Animal Control• By-law Enforcement• Infrastructure Maintenance
Development Charges
• Expanded Transit System• New/Expanded Roads• New Recreation Centres• Expansion of Existing Recreation
Centres• New Parks• New Libraries (limited)• New Fire Stations (limited)• Debt capacity allows infrastructure
ahead of growth• Debt service payments charged
back to developers
FUNDING
14
15
7-Year Historical Average – Property Tax Bill
$1,365 $1,445 $1,478 $1,526 $1,589 $1,733 $1,792
$1,457 $1,489 $1,502 $1,516 $1,515
$1,543 $1,570
$760 $753 $747 $739 $729
$736 $738 $3,583 $3,687 $3,727 $3,782 $3,834
$4,012* $4,100*
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Pro
pert
y T
ax
Budget Year
City of Brampton Region of Peel School Boards
*Includes Peel Memorial HospitalLevy: $52 (2013) and $50 (2014)
16
2014 Residential Property Tax Bill – Total
16
City of Brampton
$1,742
Hospital Levy$50
Region of Peel$1,570
School Boards
$738
* Based on 2014 average household with an MPAC assessed value of $364,000 (Brampton)
17
2015 Budget Drivers
• Provincially mandated as a high-growth municipality
• Ongoing capital spending required to provide existing services for growth areas
• Growing infrastructure inventory drives operating costs
• Need to balance:
• Spending
• Managing growth
• Changing demographics
• Limiting tax increases
• Limited financial resources
18
2015 Budget Pressures and Relief
Budget Pressures
• Compensation adjustments (Fire and Transit collective bargaining)
• New staff requests – address growth, maintain services, new service
• Inflation on non-labour expenditures
• Roads, parks and open space maintenance
• Operating costs for corporate facilities
• Reduced yield on investments
• Legislated requirements
• Infrastructure repair & replacement
Potential Budget Relief
• Fuel costs (diesel)
• Property tax assessment growth (new homes and businesses)
19
2015 Operating Budget – Property Tax Impact
• To maintain current service levels for the foreseeable future, annual budgets require a mid to high single-digit property tax increase
• To achieve a zero property tax increase, services would need to be reduced and/or eliminated and would include no new service enhancements
2020
Capital Program
21
2015 Capital Budget Methodology
• Historically - full budget approval
• All stages of projects funded up-front
• Prepare cash flow in current year for all approved projects
• Approvals exceeded capacity to deliver
• Increasing unspent capital balance
• Trend (see chart on following slide)
22
10-Year Budget Approval vs Spending Capacity
$50.0
$75.0
$100.0
$125.0
$150.0
$175.0
$200.0
$225.0
$250.0
$275.0
$300.0
$325.0
$350.0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014*
Budget Actuals Forecast
$ M
illio
ns
* 2014 Actuals preliminary
23
2015 Capital Budget Methodology
• Capital budget methodology has changed from full project budgeting to capital contract budgeting
• Recommended target will be focused on projects where procurement (i.e. issuance of contracts) is feasible within the 2015 calendar year
• Review of unspent capital (including reallocation of funds) is ongoing
Capital Budget Priorities:
• Infrastructure replacement / maintenance
• To manage growth responsibly, infrastructure is required in advance of development
24
2015 Capital Budget Methodology - Reporting
• Keeping Council Informed
• Quarterly Capital Status Report
• As-needed reports for budget amendments in-year
25
Capital Budget Methodology – 2016 and beyond
• New Council and community priorities
• Staff are committed to resolving the current situation
2626
Status of Capital Program
27
Financial Review of the City of BramptonThree (3) Main Areas of Focus
• Small capital program for 2015 - focus on completing projects from 2014 and previous
• Building a strong infrastructure fund to leverage for future repair and replacement needs
• Regular status reports to Councillors and City Council
28
Context
Capital Program Status Reports to Committee of Council - March 5 and April 2, 2014
• Perception that funds were misplaced• Identified need for more detailed reporting – refine approach to defining
project and funding status
Summer 2014• Evaluation of all open capital projects• Confirmed that $826 million was in progress
Fall 2014• Team established a categorical breakdown approach for open projects• Analytical tool to monitor performance for each project• Provided the opportunity to identify projects experiencing issues and that
require review by senior management
2929
Capital Program Overview
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
$ billions
Capital Program 2004 – 2014(total fund = $2.648 billion)
DELIVERED($1.895 billion or 72%)
UNDERWAY($0.753 billion or 28%)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Number of Projects
(total projects = 1,468)
COMPLETED(912 or 62%)
IN PROGRESS556 or 38%
3030
Capital Program Current Status
31
Quantitative Review
Dedicated staff team continues routine review of “in-progress” projects utilizing status categorization tool and monitoring cash flow activity.
Staff team identifies projects for closure and return of funds, to address:
• Re-prioritization• Major change in scope
32
‘In Progress’ Analysis
* Values as of December 31, 2014
CategoryCapital Funds Projects
% $ % #Active Multi-Year Projects
66% $ 493,841,958 44% 243
Active One-Year Projects
2% $ 15,252,476 4% 20
Asset Purchases 6% $ 41,853,015 11% 60
External Partner Delivery
16% $ 120,028,009 12% 64
Projects with Closeout Issues
4% $ 33,033,260 15% 83
Delayed and Dormant
7% $ 49,381,353 15% 85
TOTAL =100% $ 753, 390, 070 100% 556
33
Qualitative Review
Staff continue business process improvement reviews in the following areas:
• Master planning
• Capacity and resource planning
• Delivery and project management
• Communication and stakeholder engagement
3434
Community Engagement
and Communications
35
Community Engagement & Communications Costs
• Community Engagement estimated costs $36,500 - $40,000
• Communications estimated costs $80,452 - $117,252
• Binder production/presentations estimated costs $10,000
3636
Community Grant Making