fhwa public meeting boards june 5, 2012 u.s. widening meeting

ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRWelcome to the

P U B L I C I N F O R M AT I O N M E E T I N GWelcome!Thank you for attending tonights Public Information Meeting for the Environmental Assessment (EA) of Route 1 Improvements at Fort Belvoir. The EA is being prepared by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to address deficiencies in the Route 1 corridor between Telegraph Road and Mount Vernon Memorial Highway in Fairfax County. This undertaking is a collaborative effort among Fairfax County, the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Department of the Army, and FHWA. The purpose of tonight's meeting is:

To receive citizen comments on the alternatives and the Environmental Assessment. To share information on the study process and its current status.

Please take the time to examine the information provided, ask as many questions as you wish, and give us your comments and suggestions. Your input is needed as part of the environmental review process and it is important. Comment sheets are available for written comments and may be submitted tonight or by postal or electronic mail after the meeting until July 6, 2012. A verbatim reporter is also available to record your comments orally. All comments received will be reviewed and considered by the project study team.

Thank you for attending!

F E D E R A L H I G H W AY A D M I N I S T R AT I O N FA I R FA X C O U N T Y V I R G I N I A D E PA R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R TAT I O N D E PA R T M E N T O F T H E A R M Y

ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRPURPOSE AND NEEDCurrent Conditions:Route 1 is a four to six-lane urban principal arterial. The roadway is primarily four through lanes within the study limits. Current average daily traffic volumes on the roadway within the study area range between 37,000 56,000 vehicles per day. The current posted speed limit is 50 mph from Telegraph Road to just north of the Fairfax County Parkway and 45 mph north of the Fairfax County Parkway to Mount Vernon Memorial Highway.

Purpose:The purpose of the project is to address traffic capacity deficiencies on Route 1 within the study limits.

Need:The project will address: Inability of existing roadway to accommodate current (37,000 56,000 vehicles per day) and forecasted (43,000 55,000* vehicles per day in 2040) traffic demand Inadequate accommodations for high turning movement volumes (e.g., between Fairfax County Parkway and Pohick Road/Tulley Gate) Conflicts between through and turning traffic (into property entrances, intersecting streets) Physical and geometric deficiencies of existing roadway Deficient geometry (e.g., narrow lanes, short turn lanes) Lack of pedestrian and bicycle facilities Safety concerns (e.g., pedestrian/ bicyclist access, lack of shoulders)

*The high end of the range in 2040 is similar to existing conditions because of the diversion of some traffic via Mulligan Road, which will provide a direct connection between Telegraph Road and Route 1.

F E D E R A L H I G H W AY A D M I N I S T R AT I O N

FA I R FA X C O U N T Y

V I R G I N I A D E PA R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R TAT I O N

D E PA R T M E N T O F T H E A R M Y

ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRHOW ARE NOISE LEVELS MEASURED?Equivalent Noise Level The equivalent steady-state sound level, which in a stated period of time, contains the same acoustic energy as the time-varying sound level during the same time period. Equivalent noise levels are used in highway noise studies because the Federal Highway Administrations Noise Abatement Criteria are given in equivalent noise levels. For most land uses in the project corridor, the applicable Noise Abatement Criterion is 67 decibels (dBA, Leq(h)). When noise levels approach or exceed the Noise Abatement Criterion, the Federal Highway Administrations regulations require that noise abatement be considered. (Approach is defined as within 1 decibel of the criterion.)WEIGHTED NOISE LEVELS IN dBAAircraft Overflight Truck Distant Car Cars on Nearby Boulevard Family Car

80 70 60 50 40 30 ACTUAL VARYING NOISE LEVEL 0 1 2 3 4 5 TIME IN MINUTES 6 7 8 9 10Dog Barks

EQUIVALENT NOISE LEVEL

COMMON NOISE LEVELSCOMMON OUTDOOR SOUND LEVELS NOISE LEVEL dBA110B-747-200 Takeoff at 2 miles

COMMON INDOOR SOUND LEVELS

Rock Band

100 90

Diesel Truck at 50 ft. Noisy Urban Daytime Gas Lawn Mower at 100 ft. Commercial Area

Food Blender at 3 ft. Garbage Disposal at 3 ft.

80 Shouting at 3 ft.

70 Vacuum Cleaner at 10 ft. 60 Normal Speech at 3 ft.

Quiet Urban Daytime Quiet Urban Nighttime Quiet Suburban Nighttime

50 Large Business Office 40 Refrigerator 30

Quiet Rural Nighttime

Library

20 10Threshold of Hearing

0F E D E R A L H I G H W AY A D M I N I S T R AT I O N FA I R FA X C O U N T Y V I R G I N I A D E PA R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R TAT I O N D E PA R T M E N T O F T H E A R M Y

ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRWILL MY NEIGHBORHOOD GET A N O I S E WA L L ?WHAT IS A NOISE WALL?It is a specially designed structure built to reduce noise levels created by nearby highway traffic. Noise walls are used when other strategies, such as shifting the alignment, reducing the speed limit, or depressing the roadway below ground level are not feasible. Noise walls are built only after detailed noise impact studies are conducted and certain conditions are met.

HOW IS NOISE IMPACT DETERMINED?Engineers use computer models to predict noise levels for the loudest hour of the day for future conditions. Data used in the model include the roads design, the areas topography, the distance between the road and nearby properties, traffic speeds, and the sounds created by different types of vehicles. The predicted future noise levels are compared with FHWA and VDOT noise abatement criteria. If this comparison identifies an impact, noise reduction options are considered.

STUDY RESULTS FOR THIS PROJECTAfter identifying the locations of noise impacts and considering various noise abatement options, the noise study for this project identified a number of feasible and reasonable noise barriers for further consideration to mitigate predicted noise impacts. These barriers are shown on the display boards at this meeting and detailed information is in the Noise Analysis Technical Report, which is also here for review. A final decision to construct any of these barriers has NOT been made at this time. Any barrier identified must satisfy final feasibility and cost-effectiveness criteria based on approved road design plans and all required materials and installation costs. To be approved for construction, noise walls must meet the following conditions: They must not create a safety or engineering problem. They must reduce noise levels by at least five decibels for the impacted properties that the noise wall protects. They must meet the 1,600-square-foot requirement for Maximum Square Footage of Abatement per Benefitted Receptor

(MaxSF/BR).

If the final analysis determines a barrier to be feasible and reasonable, the affected public will be given an opportunity to decide if they favor the barrier. For more information, review the available noise technical report or talk to a member of the project study team.


ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRP OT E N T I A L LO C AT I O N S O F N O I S E AT T E N UAT I O N M E A S U R E S A LT E R N AT I V E B


ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRP OT E N T I A L LO C AT I O N S O F N O I S E AT T E N UAT I O N M E A S U R E S A LT E R N AT I V E C

C

C


ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRO N - G O I N G T R A N S P O R TAT I O N PROJECTS NEAR THE STUDY AREA

Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan The Policy component of the Comprehensive Plan under Transportation designates a 176-foot-wide typical cross section, with transit in the median, for the Route 1 Enhanced Transportation Corridor from Huntington Metrorail Station to I-95. Each build alternative considered for evaluation in the EA has a 32-foot wide median, which would be reserved for future transit on Route 1 in accordance with the Plan. The Comprehensive Plan also calls for a future interchange or grade-separated improvements at the Route 1 intersections with Telegraph Road and Fairfax County Parkway, which are included as part of Alternative C.

Fort Belvoir EIS, Master Plan, and TMP Fort Belvoir is currently developing a Transportation Management Program (TMP), with a draft expected in July 2012. The TMP is part of the Fort Belvoir Master Plan and accompanying Environmental Impact Statement, which are expected to be completed in February 2013.


ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIREVOLUTION OF T YPICAL SECTIONExisting ConditionsPrimarily four through lanes, two lanes in each direction, with lane widths varying from 11 to 12 feet. Variable shoulder widths where available. Variable median width near Telegraph Road, tapering to no median throughout the remainder of the project corridor.

2003 VDOT Location Study AlternativesFrom: Belvior Woods Parkway To: Fairfax County Parkway 55 MPH Design Speed 6-Lane Divided From: Fairfax County Parkway To: Mount Vernon Memorial Hwy/Old Mill Road 45 MPH Design Speed 6-Lane DividedProposed Right of Way

From: Woodlawn Road To: Mount Vernon Memorial Hwy/Old Mill Road 45 MPH Design Speed Woodlawn Plantation (Retaining Wall Option) 6-Lane Divided

Proposed Right of Way





10 Asphalt Trail

11-6 Landscaping Area

15 Oversized Outside Lane to Accommodate Bicycles

12 Thru Lane

13 Thru Lane

16 Landscaped Raised Median

13 Thru Lane

12 Thru Lane


16-6 Landscaping Area

6 Concrete Sidewalk

10

6-6

15

12 Thru Lane

13 Thru Lane

16 Landscaped Raised Median

13 Thru Lane

12 Thru Lane


11-6

6 8 15 Oversized Outside Lane to Accommodate Bicycles 12 Thru Lane 13 Thru Lane 8 13 Thru Lane 12 Thru Lane 15 Oversized Outside Lane to Accommodate Bicycles 5 - 6 5 10 Asphalt Trail 3

Oversized Asphalt Landscaping Outside Lane to Area Trail Accommodate Bicycles

Landscaping Concrete Area Sidewalk

40 Roadway 150 Right of Way

40 Roadway


40 Roadway

52 Southbound Route 1 101 - 6 Right of Way

52 Northbound Route 1 18 Utility and Pedestrian Easement

Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan AlternativeRichmond Highway Cross Section Including At-Grade Transitway in CenterProposed Right of Way Proposed Right of Way

9

9

38 3 Lanes

16 Platform or Left Turn Lane

26 Transitway: BRT/LRT

16 Platform or Left Turn Lane

38 3 Lanes

9

9

Asphalt Landscaping Trail Area

Landscaping Asphalt Area Trail

180 Right of Way

FAIRFAX COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, 2011 Edition POLICY PLAN Transportation Appendix, Amended through 3-9-2009

Current Proposed 148-foot Typical SectionProposed Right of Way Proposed Right of Way

10

8

14

12 Thru Lane

13 Thru Lane

32

13 Thru Lane

12 Thru Lane

14

47

5

Oversized Asphalt Landscaping Outside Lane to Trail Area Accommodate Bicycles

RESERVED MEDIAN FOR FUTURE PUBLIC TRANSIT

Oversized Concrete Outside Lane to Sidewalk Accommodate Landscaping Bicycles Area


39 Roadway





ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRC O N S I D E R AT I O N O F T R A N S I TRoute 1 has been the subject of numerous roadway and transit-related studies and efforts. Currently, Metrobus and Fairfax Connector offer bus service along the project corridor, and service adjustments where recently launched by both agencies in response to the increase in base personnel and the opening of the new Fort Belvoir Community Hospital. In consideration of the following documents or guidelines, preliminary alternatives include a reserved median for public transit (e.g., bus lanes, rail, monorail). In the near-term, if the Route 1 project area is widened to six lanes, the typical section would then match the adjacent sections of Route 1 and increase the potential to successfully utilize one of those lanes for enhanced public transit. Implementation of transit within the roadway corridor would be examined by others as part of separate studies. Similarly, in the future, implementation of light rail or other transit modes in the median would also be the subject of future studies.Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan Implement enhanced transit service along Richmond Highway, such as Metro, Light Rail, Bus Rapid Transit. Establish transit stations within the project limits at the railroad line on Fort Belvoir and at Telegraph Road. Route 1 Location Study and Project C Environmental Assessment Designs should not preclude transit services in the Route 1 corridor. Senate Joint Resolution 292, Route 1 Transit Study Near-term Recommendations - Improve conditions for transit operations and riders: Conduct necessary study and analysis to implement enhanced public transit. Conduct pedestrian facility and shelter assessment and develop a funding strategy to improve the existing conditions. Focus redevelopment to the corridor. Long-term Recommendations - Plan for the future: Conduct land use analysis and develop a vision for economic development/redevelopment in the corridor. Conduct feasibility analysis to determine potential for extending metro or implementing light rail. Memorandum of Agreement between VDOT and the Department of the Army The existing 80-foot easement may be expanded to a maximum base easement of 148 feet between the Fairfax County Parkway and Telegraph Road. The easement for improvements may not be granted to VDOT until environmental studies, NEPA analysis, and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) analyses are completed for the proposed action. Design Criteria Based on the maximum base easement agreed upon by VDOT and the Department of the Army, the following design criteria has been established for the Route 1 improvements, in accordance with Fairfax County and VDOT guidelines:





ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRE N V I R O N M E N TA L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S





ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT BELVOIRSCHEDULE AND NEXT STEPSScheduleScoping Data Collection Alternatives Development / Public Information Meeting Environmental Assessment / Public Information Meeting Final Decision on the Environmental Assessment by FHWA Complete Complete Complete We Are Here

Summer 2012

Next StepsStudy team review of public comments. Revision of EA, as appropriate, to reflect changes or new information resulting from comments received on the EA. FHWA Decision.

Thank YouThank you for taking the time to review the materials presented at this public meeting. Your comments are valuable and greatly appreciated. FHWA will carefully consider all comments received at this meeting and during the comment period. You may leave your comments in the box provided at tonights meeting. You may also record your comments orally at the designated recording station. If you are not ready to provide your comments tonight, written comments must be postmarked or sent electronically no later than July 6, 2012: By Mail: Mr. Jack Van Dop Environmental Specialist Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, VA 20166

By E-mail: [email protected]


Asphalt Trail 3 Thru Lanes Southbound Route 1E s me t ae n Po o e rp s d

Landscaped Raised Median

3 Thru Lanes Northbound Route 1

Sidewalk

C/L RTE. 1

2 : 1

1 : 2

3-0"

10-0" ASPHALT TRAIL

8-0" LANDSCAPING AREA

2-0"

14-0" OVERSIZED OUTSIDE LANE TO ACCOMMODATE BICYCLES

12-0" THRU LANE

13-0" THRU LANE

13-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE


2-0"

4-7"

5

2-0"

LANDSCAPING CONCRETE AREA SIDEWALK

23-0"

39-0" ROADWAY

32-0" LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN

39-0" ROADWAY

13-7"

78-0"

68-7"

146-7" ESMT.

E s me t ae n1 : 22 : 1SCALE 0

T PC L E TO (e ga h o d o ui n o d - A pe t A en t e Ba d ) Y IA S C I N T l rp R a t M l a R a ) (p ls o l ra vs e l g i t i n CAsphalt TrailE s me t ae n

Po o e rp s d

5

10

3 Thru Lanes Southbound Route 1

Landscaped Raised Median


Sidewalk

C/L RTE. 1 GUNSTON ROAD BRIDGE PIER

MSE WALL

E s me t ae nMSE WALLSCALE 0 5

Po o e rp s d

1-0"

1-0"

3-6"

10-0" ASPHALT TRAIL

8-0" LANDSCAPING AREA

2-0"


12-0" THRU LANE

13-0" THRU LANE

13-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE


2-0"

4-7"

5

4-11"

LANDSCAPING CONCRETE AREA SIDEWALK

22-6"

39-0" ROADWAY

32-0" LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN

39-0" ROADWAY

15-6"

77-6"

70-6"

148-0" ESMT.

T PC L E TO (t u s n o d r g ) (p ls o l ra vs a d ) Y IA S C I N A G nt R a Bi e - A pe t A en t e B n C o d i t i

Po o e rp s d

10

Asphalt ShldrE s me t ae n P d s ra e e ti n E s me t ae n

3 Thru Lanes Southbound Route 1

Shldr

Shldr


ShldrE s me t ae n

TrailPo o e rp s d

Po o e rp s d

Railing

Retaining Wall Barrier Barrier

2

5-0"

4-0"

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

Barrier Barrier

Retaining Wall

Retaining Wall

C/L

SHOULDER

THRU LANE

THRU LANE

THRU LANE

SHOULDER

SHOULDER

THRU LANE

THRU LANE

THRU LANE

SHOULDER

ASPHALT TRAIL

P d s ra / it e e ti n Ut i ly0

4-6"

8-0"

12-0"

12-0"

12-0"

8-0"

5-0"

8-0"

12-0"

12-0"

12-0"

8-0"

2 5-0"

10-0"

3-0"

59-0"

56-6"

SOUTHBOUND ROUTE 111-0"PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 144-6" (WITHOUT RESERVATION FOR FUTURE TRANSIT)

NORTHBOUND ROUTE 1115-6" RIGHT OF WAY 18-0"UTILITY AND PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT

RESERVED FOR FUTURE TRANSIT

176-6" (WITH RESERVATION FOR FUTURE TRANSIT)

BF R A E S C I N( o l n o d o ui n o d - N t p la l t A en t e Ba d ) IU C T D E TO Wo d w R a t M l a R a ) ( o A pcb o l ra vs a l g i e t i n C

E s me t ae n32-0"SCALE 5 10

l ydm i L n a Hl6 12 0. 1+ 62 T O P 2 1 6

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i

TL 1L r hu 2T TL 1R

Phase 2

1 61

Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wam da y L n1 60

TL 1R u r h 2T TL 1L

t re te S ie sd r en h (rp sd Po oe WS nl i a g )

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y

T P

8 4 . 9 3 0+ 69

e rl ic l lC Hi

0 69

6 0 6

5 0 6

W

B e l v o i r W4 0 6

e v i r D

( oi d M di f e E ii S n l x tg i a sn g )T P 2 .2 9 + 31 0 6

l d

o o d s P a r k w

P o h i c k

e v o CI nl et

O

0 63

a y

1 od WM -BP n SRT L0 62 1 93 1 . 0+1 C6 P

sn x tg / E ii RW l t 0 Ap a Ta 1 sh l ri

3 39 1. 4545+ T P

0 61

sn x tg / E ii RW1 i t un a e R h T r Ln g21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 PC 40+ .1 577

l ri Ta t l pa n) sh t g A i s 0 1 t x Ei e M (e44

St n o e I l n et Drv ie

d oa hR a rp e lg Te

1 8 . 8 0 +5 6 79 0 6 C P

7 0 6

Il C v n t oe e

a y

rW i vo l Be

2

46

3 1

20

37

38

2 1

39

1 1

LL 1 T

0 60

1 Left Turn Lane

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

0 .6 05 8+

0 1

3 Left Turn Lanes

ih y n h i Rc mo dH g wa

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

9

3 Thru Lanes

C 8 PC

9 59 1 C 9 +5 3 P 5 88 .

7

Ol Col hes erRoad d c t

sn x tg / E ii RW

Pohick Cemetery

( oi d M di f e E ii S n l x tg i a sn g )

40

41

42

RL 1 T s ae T r Ln 4 hu

PT 1 29. 4+ 00

1 6

1 7

1 8

1 9

0 . 6 3 02 0+ T 6 P

4 1

1 5

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

43

1 i t un a e R h T r Ln g

a Ln r un fT s et e n a 1L uL r h 3T

sn x tg / E ii RW9 58

S WM 1 P n -A o d

k d i w l 5S e a

rp sd / Po oe RWe o P

d a o R

c oi Ph k s p cp l Ei oa h hr C uc

6 9 +3 1 O P T 5 79 .

BE VOI W OODS P L R ARKW AY

OL COL D CHE TE ROAD S R

S tw e at r R o a d

TE E L GRAP ROAD/ H

200_ STA = 8+30.50 190_ 180_ 170_

I E COVE DRI NL T VE

47

48

TL 2L

e et l ep R t n oi P

ds oo kw r Pa ay

D ve i r

y wa h g i dH n mo h c i R e

3

L T 2L r hu 1T

_200 _190 STA = 41+21.89 EL = 142.74 _170 _180

STA = 25+91.14 EL = 155.99 EL = 156.50

L = 600.00 160_ L = 350.00 Existing Ground

6 . % 1 5150_ 140_ 130_ 120_

-. % 1 7 2 -. % 1 7 28 . % 0 2STA = 15+00.00 EL = 147.50

8 . % 0 2

_160 L = 500.00 _150 _140 _130 _120

-. % 1 9 4 -. % 1 9 4

-. % 0 7 3 -. % 0 7 3STA = 33+10.20 EL = 145.76 Proposed Grade

-. 53 2 %

L = 250.00 110_ 100_ 90_ 80_ 70_ 60_ 50_ 40_ 30_ 20_ 1 46 5 .2 1 46 5 .5 1 38 5 .4 1 25 5 .8 1 13 5 .1 1 00 5 .4 1 87 4 .9 1 81 4 .5 1 83 4 .5 1 91 4 .5 1 99 4 .7 1 08 5 .0 1 16 5 .2 1 24 5 .5 1 32 5 .7 1 41 5 .0 1 46 5 .9 1 49 5 .1 1 47 5 .3 1 41 5 .7 1 32 5 .2 1 18 5 .9 1 04 5 .0 1 89 4 .0 1 75 4 .2 1 64 4 .2

L = 400.00

-. 53 2 %STA = 47+69.90 EL = 108.27

_110 _100 _90 _80 _70 _60 _50 _40 _30 _20

L = 400.00

1 56 4 .0

1 50 4 .6

1 46 4 .9

1 43 4 .1

1 39 4 .4

1 35 4 .3

1 23 4 .8

1 02 4 .5

1 71 3 .3

1 30 3 .1

1 79 2 .5

1 26 2 .3

1 73 1 .5

1 26 1 .8

10_ 0_ 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

_0 48

Y US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1 E R FL N G N O D PA O D O UL EE R P T L G A HR A T M L I A R A - L NA DP O IU E ,02 J N 521

S E T L E N TV A T R A IEB- H E 1

0

100

1 88 0 .2

_10

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge

Fort Belvoiren t t i r B D ve i r

g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o WaD v o A fl ai n iid s re

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA Wildlife Refuge

Cook I lt ne D rv ie

S ne D i a jr r v e

l t 0 Ap a Ta 1 sh l risn x tg / E ii RW3+ 727 PT 7 7 .

2 7 8 2+6. PC 7 1 1

. 4753 PT 59+

40. PC 56+ 66

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

10 Asphalt Trail (Meet Existing)

T r Ln s 3 hu a e0 7

25 62 PI 50+ .

48

49

50

g R h T r Ln 1 i t un a e T r Ln s 3 hu a e51

52

y ih a n h i Rc mo dH g w

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

5 Sidewalk

rp sd / Po oe RW

od o P eR a

1 7

3 7

4 7

5 7

6 7

y ih a n h i Rc mo dH g w8 7

7 7

9 7

Accotink Bay Wildlife Refuge Fort Belvoir

COOK I E DRI NL T VE

200_ 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ 150_ 140_

BRI TTE DRI N VE

80

81

rp sd / Po oe RW

82

83

_200 _190 _180 _170 _160 _150 _140 STA = 53+64.69 STA = 62+41.27 EL = 90.75 _130 _120

130_ EL = 95.98 120_ 110_ 100_ 90_ 80_ STA = 57+32.57 70_ 60_ 50_ 40_ 30_ 20_ 1 88 0 .2 1 57 0 .8 1 35 0 .2 1 14 0 .5 L = 500.00 Existing Ground EL = 83.00

-. % 2 7 0 -. % 2 7 0L = 200.00 L = 450.00

_110 _100 _90 _80 _70 _60

-. 3 3 5%

-. 3 3 5%

5 . % 1 2 5 . % 1 2

-. 3 9 6%

Proposed Grade

-. 3 9 6%-. % 2 0 0

_50 _40

STA = 72+67.64 EL = 52.91

-. % 2 0 0_30 _20

L = 200.00 9 .8 93 9 .7 72 9 .8 45 9 .2 12 8 .7 83 8 .4 65 8 .1 57 8 .0 59 8 .7 70 8 .9 81 8 .6 81 8 .8 69 8 .4 46 8 .1 12 7 .2 75 7 .4 38 7 .5 01 6 .6 64 6 .8 27 5 .9 90 5 .5 54 5 .6 24 5 .7 02 4 .7 82 4 .7 62 4 .7 42 4 .6 22 4 .7 02 3 .6 82 3 .6 62 3 .5 42 3 .2 410

10_

_10

0_ 48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

_0 83


84


100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i u u d rp sd r g Sr t e Po oe Bi e t c r r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA Wildlife Refugek n i t o c c A k e e r C

kw ay y aif F r ax Count Par

a l i co n V l e A ct k i gk i k oad Bac lc R

ane o s nL Ander

vr ot e o F rB l i


W -A S M4 od Pn

g t un a e 2 Ri h T r L n s

et u n a e 3L f T r L n s


5 1 1

Pond3 1 1

6 1 1

TRAVERSE #39 ELEV. = 38.70

4 1 1

4 27 6. " 3 9 E 93 7 5 N 7

. 708 0 9 1 3+ PT 0 14

0 16

0 17

0126 7 PC 1 + .3

rp sd / Po oe RW99 00 1 01 1

T r Ln s 3 hu a e96 97 98 95 93 94

02 1

ns ae huL Tr 3 s ae nLn Tr tu g R h 2 i

0 15

0 18

d a el e r g R p c Bi e i vr co n Ce k oe A ct k re

l t 0 Ap a Ta 1 sh l ri

e ns n a rL tu hT g R 2 i s ae uLn Tr 3 h n ae rL -un UT 1

0 19

sn x tg / E ii RW

y wa ih Hg d n h o c i m R

e n n a rL tu fT L 1 e ns ae huL Tr 3 ns ae unL Tr h g i t 2R

0 1 1

1 1 1

2 1 1

7 1 1

-A WM 3 S

e n n a rL tu hT g R 1 i s ae uLn Tr 3 h

LL 1 T

0 13

83

84

85

86

87

ae Ln s t Lf un 2 e Tr ns ae Tr L 3 hu

p u So y tes B s t B Oh rv a el e o C l r R p c B x u et

e l nr end E ao K n ey t e o e s S ee H m l s hlr y t c Hs r rp r ) ( ioiPo et

88

89

90

91

92

ns ae g R h Tr L 2 i t un

w y ih a n h i Rc mo dH g

k d i w l 5S e a sn x tg / E ii RWnk i ot c Ac k ee Cr

rp sd / Po oe RW

Accotink BayFairfax County Accotink Pumping Station

Wildlife Refuge

c o i R a I poe e t P h k o d m rvm ns r i U d r o s ut n (n e C nt co )

Pe o R a od

Accotink Bay Wildlife Refuge

F rB l i ot e o vrACCOTI NK CRE K E BACKL CK ROAD/ I

F RF AI AX COUNTY P ARKW AY

ANDE ON L RS ANE

200_ 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ 150_ 140_ 130_ 120_ 110_ 100_ 90_ 80_

P OHI CK ROAD

8 1 1

n od B P 3 W S M

RL 1 T u Tr 3 h

5 .5 8 1 1 3 1 + PC

k c hi Po ad Ro_200 _190 _180 _170 _160 _150 _140 _130 _120 _110 _100 _90 _80

STA = 111+39.55 70_ EL = 34.16 60_ 50_ Existing Ground 40_ Proposed Grade BRIDGE LIMITS OVER ACCOTINK CREEK _60 _50 STA = 100+00.00 EL = 20.79 STA = 105+94.83 EL = 17.81 L = 200.00 L = 350.00 L = 200.00 _70

STA = 97+50.00 EL = 26.87

0 . % 1 0 0 . % 1 0_40 _30 _20

-. % 0 0 530_ 20_ 3 .2 41 3 .2 36 3 .2 31 3 .2 26 3 .2 21 3 .2 16 3 .2 11

-. % 0 0 5

L = 180.00

0 . % 3 0 0 . % 3 0

-. % 2 3 4

-. % 0 0 53 .2 06 3 .2 01 2 .2 96 2 .2 91 2 .2 86 2 .2 81 2 .2 76 2 .3 70 2 .6 55 2 .2 32 2 .7 12 2 .9 02 1 .9 97 1 .9 92 1 .9 87

-. % 0 0 51 .1 86 1 .1 94

2 .1 12

2 .7 39

2 .7 69

2 .7 99

3 .9 27

3 .8 46

3 .6 57

3 .6 67

3 .6 77

3 .6 87

3 .6 97

10_

0_ 83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

_0 118



0

4 .2 08

_10

100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa

Fort BelvoirBac klc ik R oadShep ar L d an e

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i u u d rp sd r g Sr t e Po oe Bi e t c r

SWM-4A PondBel o v iC r ou r t

r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm nsAccess Control Point (By Others)ad t Guns on Ro

e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA Wildlife Refuge


ad Ro r Iy

a od a eR ed M

1 1 6

3 hu Tr1 1 7

1 1 9

10 2

1 T LL 3 hu Tr 2 T RL

PT 12 2 + 28. 1 5

1 T LL

PC 1 31 1 8+ . 55

1 T RL1 1 8

Proposed R/W

11 2

12 2

R m v E ii R i a Bi e e oe x t g ar d r g sn l o d13 2 14 2

15 2

44 1 44 1 0 PT 1 +3. 3

16 2

PC 17 2 + 61 8 . 1

8 + .4 4197 PC 1 4 12

17 2

5 3 .7 39+ 0 PT 1

12 3

1 33

1 34

S WM 4 P n -B o d

35 1

36 1

37 1

3 18

Existing R/W

11 3

3 19

Rc i m h od n H ih gw a y

18 2

19 2

4 11

43 1

45 1

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

46 1

4 17

48 1

10 3

4 10

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

gw y ih a n h i Rc mo dH

Gunston Road Improvements (Under Construction)oad t Guns on R

5 SidewalkPohick Road Improvements (Under Construction)

Po oe RW rp sd /


vr ot e o F rB l i

et re t t sS 1

1st Street Improvements (Under Construction)

BACKL CK ROAD/ I

200_ 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ 150_ 140_ STA = 137+74.00 130_ 120_ STA = 126+75.50 110_ 100_ EL = 68.78 L = 150.00 EL = 96.86

( UNDE CONS R TRUCTI ON)

G N O D O D O UL EE R P T L G A HR A T M L I A R A

NE GUNS W TON ROAD BRI DGE

Y US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1

E I TI X S NG GUNS TON ROAD BRI DGE

P OHI CK ROAD

49 1

5 10

51 1

_200 _190 _180 _170 _160 _150 _140 _130 _120 _110 _100

0 . % 4 190_ 80_ 70_ 60_ 50_ L = 250.00 STA = 118+89.12 EL = 41.65 Existing Ground L = 250.00

6 . % 2 1_90 _80

0 . % 4 14 . % 3 5

4 . % 0 9

4 . % 0 9STA = 131+30.00 EL = 71.01

Proposed Grade

_70 _60 _50 _40

0 . % 1 040_

4 . % 3 5L = 350.00

30_ 20_ 1 01 0 .4 1 27 0 .5 1 53 0 .5 1 79 0 .6 1 05 1 .7 1 31 1 .7 1 57 1 .8 1 83 1 .8 1 09 2 .9 1 35 2 .9 1 62 2 .0 1 88 2 .0 3 .6 87 3 .6 97 4 .2 08 4 .6 26 4 .9 54 4 .3 89 5 .8 23 5 .3 58 5 .8 92 6 .3 27 6 .3 60 6 .0 83 6 .9 93 6 .8 98 7 .7 04 7 .2 19 7 .7 43 7 .3 78 8 .5 18 8 .6 58 8 .7 98 9 .9 38 10_ 0_ 116 9 .2 74

_30 _20 1 14 3 .1 _10

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

_0 151



0

52 1

3T huL r a ns e

Me d R a ae od

10 Asphalt Trail

ad Ro c ik Poh

100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e iWo d w ol n a

M i eac a t ne n n

L mb r R a a et o d

B ii ud g ln

Cons iuto tt i n Roa d

Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i u u d rp sd r g Sr t e Po oe Bi e t c r r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w yN ORTH

Q ae u kr M e n h ue et g o s i

Wo od lw a Ro ad n

Ga d i rn V w e H ue os

F rB l i ot e o vrn o ces o t P i A cs C nrl o t (By Others)

Me d R a ae od

Rc mo dH g wa i h n ih y

E ii RW x tg / sn

A cs E sm n ces ae e t( oi d M di f e E ii S n l x tg i a sn g )

Po oe RW rp sd /

Wo d w ol n a B pi C uc a tt h r s h

-A o d WM 5 P n S18 4 19 4

1 sh l ri 0 Ap a Ta t l10 5 PC 1 54+ 3 8 .8 57 10 4 7 1 7 PC 1 0+6.

11 5

12 5

7 11

62 1 43 . 62 21 PT 1 +

14 5

67 1

68 1

1 59

3 hu a e T r Ln s

60 1

61 1

Rc m i h o n H d i g wa h y

16 5

1 57

63 1

64 1

ae Ln s t Lf un 2 e Tr

65 1

e T r Ln s 3 hu a

15 7 PT 15 7 +9 1. 87

Ln n ae g R h Tr 1 i tu66 1

13 5

69 1

12 7

13 7

15 5

14 7

19 7 PC 19 7 +3 2 . 1 4

ns ae t rL Lf un 2 e T s e T r Ln 3 hu a Ln n ae g R h Tr 1 i tu

s ae T r Ln 3 hu

17 7

1L e T f tu rL n a n e 3T hu rL ae ns

1R i g h t T un r 3 T Ln ae hu r Ln ae s18 7

1 58

16 7

11 8

1 82

Sa o ti tn

Bel oi Road v r

F rB l i ot e o vr

5S e a i w l d kSw r u p e e Pm Sa o ti tn

Rl a d e ct o eSf a F l o b l id t le

(rp sd i a Po oe S n l g )

Po oe RW rp sd /

Rl a d e ct o e

vr e o o d m rvm ns B l iR a I poe e t r i U d r o s ut n (n e C nt co )

S ce F l ocr id e

W

d a o nR o t n ig s ah

CONS TUTI TI ON ROAD

ACCE S CONTROL P NT/ S OI

W OODL AW N ROAD

Y US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1 G N O D O D O UL EE R P T L G A HR A T M L I A R A

200_ 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ 150_ 140_ 130_ 120_ 110_ L = 250.00 STA = 156+80.72 EL = 146.54

BE VOI ROAD L R

( W E NE NTRANCE )

1 83

84 1

Sw r u p e e Pm

10 8

_200 _190 _180 STA = 165+00.00 EL = 137.26 STA = 177+63.61 EL = 120.42 Existing Ground _170 _160 _150 _140

6 . % 2 1

-. % 1 0 4 -. % 1 0 4-. % 0 7 4

L = 220.00

-. % 3 0 0STA = 162+64.06 EL = 138.37

-. % 1 0 0STA = 167+10.00 EL = 130.96 Proposed Grade

L = 420.00

_130 _120

-. % 1 0 0

-. 60 0 %

_110 _100 _90 _80 _70 _60 _50 _40 _30 _20

L = 100.00 100_ 90_ 80_ 70_ 60_ 50_ 40_ 30_ 20_ 1 62 2 .0 1 88 2 .0 1 14 3 .1 1 40 3 .1 1 66 3 .2 1 92 3 .3 1 18 4 .3 1 42 4 .8 1 53 4 .7 1 48 4 .7 1 34 4 .7 1 20 4 .7 1 06 4 .7 1 92 3 .7 1 82 3 .1 1 77 3 .2 1 65 3 .6 1 42 3 .5 1 16 3 .6 1 00 3 .6 1 90 2 .6 1 80 2 .6 1 70 2 .6 1 60 2 .6 1 50 2 .6 1 40 2 .6 1 30 2 .6 1 19 2 .3 1 97 1 .8 1 64 1 .4 1 19 1 .2 1 62 0 .4 1 02 0 .4 9 .4 42 8 .4 82 10_ 0_ 149 L = 200.00

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

_0 184



0

8 .4 22

_10

100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

lga M uli n Rd


I P ud g M B ii ln3 21 4 21

1 sh l ri 0 Ap a Ta t lE ii RW x tg / sn

Roy

5 7. 9 +1 0 PT 1 7

9 16

9 17

Ei xsi t g n R i m c o h n H d i g wa h y

9 15

ns ae Tr L 3 hu ns n ae t rL Lf u 2 e T ns ae Tr L 2 hu e r Ln un a g R hT 1 i t

200

n ae r Ln g i tu R hT 1 s ae T r Ln 2 hu ae Ln n t r Lf u 1 e T203

201

202

9 18

9 19

204

ns ae Tr L 2 hu

Wo d w S e ol n hl a l21

205

1 1 2

Soe t s r E xn xo Gs ti a Sa o tn

Gs ti a Sa o tn

94 1

206

207

So he Wae o s rh ue ( oe ) c sd l Q at In u e ul n S is i y t na F B l i er t e o . vr

Sa l t e bs

3 5 . 2 4 + 2 9 1

93 1

Wo d w ol n a

2 9 1

C P

7E vn -l e e(Modified E ii S n l x tg i a sn g )

6 3 . 79 + 0 9 1

1 9 1

M ountVer non M em oralHi i ghw ay

Po oe RW rp sd /

T P

90 1

Wo d w ol n a A t C ne uo e t r

89 1

E ii RW x tg / sn 5S e a i w l d k

OiT f n ao t u o M sn s t H ue os11 81 82

1 83

84 1

8 15

ns ae u rL h 3T8 16

8 17

88 1

M u t en n e oi Hg w y o n V ro M m r l i a a h (n e C nt co , y tes U d r o s ut n B Oh r r i )-B WM 6 S

s ae uLn Tr 3 h

Pond

M d i C l rf Cos g o i d u eto rsi f e v r n

208

209

0 21

E ii E t ne x t g nr c sn a t b C sd B Oh r o e l e (y tes o )

gw y ih a m n H h od i Rc

1 21

2

2 21

R gr o es

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i-A o d WM 6 P n S

l l ai rp sd e in Wa Po oe R t n g r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA


90_ 80_ 70_

MOUNT VE RNON ME MORI HW Y AL

MUL I L GAN ROAD/

Proposed Grade Fill Slope (Beyond) Fill Slope (Beyond)

_200 _190 _180 _170 _160 _150 _140 _130 _120 _110 _100 _90

60_ 50_ 40_ 160_ 150_ 140_ 130_ 120_ 110_ 100_ 90_ 80_ 70_ Proposed Grade 60_ 30_

Existing Ground

10W x 13H Culvert (180 @ 4% Slope)

MODIFIED CULVERT PROFILE

Cu v r le t

STA = 196+25.00 EL = 41.10 STA = 198+50.90 EL = 36.72 STA = 201+09.34 EL = 28.76

_80 _70 _60

-. 60 0 %50_

L = 150.00 L = 100.00

-. % 0 0 5-. % 1 4 9-. % 3 8 0

40_ STA = 190+36.51 30_ 20_ 9 .4 42 8 .4 82 8 .4 22 7 .4 62 7 .4 02 6 .4 42 5 .9 82 5 .5 31 4 .1 90 4 .0 59 4 .1 38 4 .3 27 4 .3 22 4 .3 17 4 .1 11 3 .4 96 Existing Ground EL = 44.05

2 .5 70

-. % 0 0 5

L = 200.00

_50 _40 _30 _20

-. % 3 8 0

-. % 1 5 2

3 .0 77

3 .0 52

3 .2 21

2 .2 94

10_

2 .3 76

L = 540.00

_10 _0 203 204 205 206 207 208 209

0_ 182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202


4 5 39 1 + 0. POT 2

M l a Ra ui n o d l g (n e C nt co ) U d r o s ut n r i (y tes B Oh r )


0

100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

l ydm i L n a Hl6 12 0. 1+ 62 T O P 2 1 6

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i

TL 1L r hu 2T TL 1R

Phase 2

1 61

Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wam da y L n1 60

TL 1R u r h 2T TL 1L

t re te S ie sd r en h (rp sd Po oe WS nl i a g )

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i u u d rp sd r g Sr t e Po oe Bi e t c r r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y

T P

8 4 . 9 3 0+ 69

e rl ic l lC Hi

6 0 6

5 0 6

W

B e l v o i r W4 0 6

e v i r D

( oi d M di f e E ii S n l x tg i a sn g )2 .2 9 + 31 0 6

l d

0 63

1 od WM -BP n S0 62 1 93 1 . 0+1 C6 P

I nl et

T P

o o d s P a r k w

P o h i c k

e v o C

O

a y

sn x tg / E ii RW l t 0 Ap a Ta 1 sh l ri

R T L

7 1 . 0 +5 45 T5 P4

2

0 61

sn x tg / E ii RW1 Right Turn Lane21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 PC 40+ 95 48.

l i Ta tr l a ) sh t g A p ii sn 0 x 1 eE et M (44

St n o e I l n et Drv ie

d oa hR a rp e lg Te0 69

1 8 . 8 0 +5 6 79 0 6 C P

7 0 6

Il C v n t oe e

a y

rW i vo l Be

46

20

1 9

36

37

38

39

1 1

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

0 60

3 .0 +6 79

0 1

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

ih y n h i Rc mo dH g wa

T r Ln s 2 hu a e T r/T 1 huR L9 59 1 C 9 +5 3 P 5 88 .

9

3 Thru Lanes

3 Thru Lanes

C PC 8

LL /T hu e T r ns 1 a rL hu 2T

7

Ol Col hes erRoad d c t

40

41

T r Ln s 4 hu a e

2 1

42


PT 1 20. 4+ 24

r un fT s et e n a 1L uL r h 3T

4 1

1 5

1 6

1 7

3 1

1 8

T r Ln s 3 hu a e 1 Left Turn Lane

43

RL 1 T

0 . 6 3 02 0+ T 6 P

1 i t un a e R h T r Ln g

sn x tg / E ii RW

Pohick Cemetery

sn x tg / E ii RW9 58

S WM 1 P n -A o d

k d i w l 5S e a

6

rp sd / Po oe RWe o P

d a o R

c oi Ph k s p cp l Ei oa h hr C uc

6 9 +3 1 O P T 5 79 .

S tw e at r R o a d

OL COL D CHE TE RD S R

200_ STA = 8+30.50 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ L = 350.00 EL = 155.99

TE E L GRAP ROAD/ H

BE VOI W OODS L R

47

48

TL 2L

e et l ep R t n oi P

ds oo kw r Pa ay

D ve i r

y wa h g i dH n mo h c e i R a Ln

TL 2L r hu 1T

STA = 25+91.14 EL = 156.50

I E COVE DRI NL T VE

P ARKW AY

1 46 5 .2

1 46 5 .5

1 38 5 .4

1 25 5 .8

1 13 5 .1

1 00 5 .4

1 87 4 .9

1 81 4 .5

1 83 4 .5

1 91 4 .5

1 99 4 .7

1 08 5 .0

1 16 5 .2

1 24 5 .5

1 32 5 .7

1 41 5 .0

1 46 5 .9

1 49 5 .1

1 47 5 .3

1 41 5 .7

1 32 5 .2

1 18 5 .9

1 04 5 .0

1 89 4 .0

1 75 4 .2

1 64 4 .2

1 56 4 .0

1 50 4 .6

1 46 4 .9

1 43 4 .1

1 39 4 .4

1 35 4 .3

1 23 4 .8

1 02 4 .5

1 71 3 .3

1 30 3 .1

1 79 2 .5

1 26 2 .3

1 73 1 .5

1 26 1 .8

110_ 100_ 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

_100 48

E O T 1 R FL R U E PO I

STA = 603+17.38 EL = 151.14 K = 37 L = 300.00 1 51 5 .0 180_ 170_ 160_ 150_ 140_ 130_ 120_ 110_ 100_ 600 601 602 603 604 605 606

STA = 606+29.16 EL = 172.23 K = 54 L = 300.00

STA = 609+93.21 EL = 176.52 K = 79 L = 200.00

STA = 613+20.00 EL = 172.06 K = 53 L = 300.00

R P SD R D F R A P PO O E G A E O R M R M O TBU D O T 1 O FO N R H O N R U E T OD O T B U D EE R P N R H O N T L G A HR A

1 1 8 +. %% 6 67 +.

-. % 1 7 3

-. 70 0 %

STA = 616+59.12 EL = 148.32 K = 37 L = 300.00

0 1 9 +. %

E V R B L OI W OODS W ARK AY P

ROUTE 1

sn x t g ru d E ii Go n

TELEGRAPH ROAD

607

608

609

610

611

612

6113

614

615

616

617

618

619

620

621

E E E R P L O E R FL T L G A HFY V RP O IY US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1 E R FL N G N O D PA O D O UL EE R P T L G A HR A T M L I A R A - L NA DP O IU E ,02 J N 521

O W N RANCE T NE E T E RCL L I L NDAM HI L CI

-. % 1 5 2

1 10 5 .2

S E T L E N TV A T R A IEC- H E 1

0

100

1 88 0 .2

k c i h d o P oa R150_ 140_ 130_ 120_

_200 _190 STA = 41+21.89 EL = 142.74 _170 Existing Ground L = 500.00 _150 _160 _180

L = 600.00

6 . % 1 5

-. % 1 7 2 -. % 1 7 28 . % 0 2STA = 15+00.00 EL = 147.50

8 . % 0 2

-. % 1 9 4 -. % 1 9 4

-. % 0 7 3 -. % 0 7 3STA = 33+10.20 EL = 145.76 Proposed Grade L = 400.00

-. 53 2 %

STA = 47+69.90 _140 EL = 108.27 _130 _120

L = 250.00 L = 400.00

-. 53 2 %

_110

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge

Fort Belvoiren t t i r B D ve i r

g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o WaD v o A fl ai n iid s re

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA Wildlife Refuge

Cook I lt ne D rv ie

S ne D i a jr r v e

l t 0 Ap a Ta 1 sh l risn x tg / E ii RW3+ 51 PT 7 68.7 7 0742 PC 2 2+ .

7 38.7 PT 59+

90 31 PC 56+ .

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

68

69

10 Asphalt Trail (Meet Existing)

50 1 86 PI 50+6.

48

49

g R h T r Ln 1 i t un a e T r Ln s 3 hu a e51

52

y ih a n h i Rc mo dH g w

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

k d i w l 5S e a rp sd / Po oe RWod o P eR a

0 7

1 7

3 7

4 7

5 7

6 7

y ih a n h i Rc mo dH g w8 7

7 7

9 7

Accotink Bay Wildlife Refuge Fort Belvoir

COOK I E DRI NL T VE

200_ 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ 150_ 140_

BRI TTE DRI N VE

80

81

rp sd / Po oe RW

82

83

_200 _190 _180 _170 _160 _150 _140 STA = 53+64.69 STA = 62+41.27 EL = 90.75 _130 _120

130_ EL = 95.98 120_ 110_ 100_ 90_ 80_ STA = 57+32.57 70_ 60_ 50_ 40_ 30_ 20_ 1 88 0 .2 1 57 0 .8 1 35 0 .2 1 14 0 .5 L = 500.00 Existing Ground EL = 83.00

-. % 2 7 0 -. % 2 7 0L = 200.00 L = 450.00

_110 _100 _90 _80 _70 _60 STA = 81+76.60

-. 3 3 5%

-. 3 3 5%

5 . % 1 2 5 . % 1 2

-. 3 9 6%

Proposed Grade

-. 3 9 6%-. % 2 0 0

EL = 34.73 L = 150.00

_50 _40

STA = 72+67.64 EL = 52.91

-. % 2 0 0

-. % 0 0 5_30 _20

L = 200.00 9 .8 93 9 .7 72 9 .8 45 9 .2 12 8 .7 83 8 .4 65 8 .1 57 8 .0 59 8 .7 70 8 .9 81 8 .6 81 8 .8 69 8 .4 46 8 .1 12 7 .2 75 7 .4 38 7 .5 01 6 .6 64 6 .8 27 5 .9 90 5 .5 54 5 .6 24 5 .7 02 4 .7 82 4 .7 62 4 .7 42 4 .6 22 4 .7 02 3 .6 82 3 .6 62 3 .5 47 3 .2 410

10_

_10

0_ 48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

_0 83



100

84

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i u u d rp sd r g Sr t e Po oe Bi e t c r r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA Wildlife Refugek n i t o c c A k e e r C

kw ay y aif F r ax Count Par

a l i co n V l e A ct k i gk i k oad Bac lc R

ane o s nL Ander

vr ot e o F rB l i


g t un a e 2 Ri h T r L n s

et u n a e 3L f T r L n s

0 17

d a el e r g R p c Bi e i vr co n Ce k oe A ct k re

l t 0 Ap a Ta 1 sh l ri

5 0 1 3 3+5. 3 0 1 1 PT

00 42 34 PC 1 + .

rp sd / Po oe RW99 98

ns ae huL Tr 3 s ae nLn Tr tu g R h 2 i

0 15

0 16

0 18

sn x tg / E ii RW

e ns n a rL tu hT g R 2 i s ae uLn Tr 3 h n ae rL -un 1UT

1 1 1

y wa ih Hg d n h o c i m R

0 19

0 1 1

2 1 1

3 1 1

4 1 1

5 1 1


Pond

ae nLn t r f u e T L 1 s ae uLn Tr 3 h ns ae nL Tr tu h g i 2R

6 1 1

-A WM 3 S

7 1 1

n od B P 3 W S M

e n n a rL h u g T i t R 1 s ae uLn Tr 3 h

7 .7 7 1 86 1 + PC

T r Ln s 3 hu a e96 97 92 93 94 95

00 1

01 1

0 12

0 14

8 1 1

RL 1 T u Tr 3 h LL 1 T

k c hi Po

ad Ro

88

89

83

84

85

86

87

e n n a rL tu fT L 1 e s ae Ln hu Tr 3

p u So y tes B s t B Oh rv a el e o C l r R p c B x u et

e l n r end E ao K n ey t e o e s S ee H m l s hlr y t c Hs r rp r ) ( ioiPo et

90

91

r Ln s un a e g R hT 2 i t

w y ih a n h i Rc mo dH g

k d i w l 5S e a sn x tg / E ii RWnk i ot c Ac k ee Cr

rp sd / Po oe RW

Accotink Bay


F rB l i ot e o vr

Fairfax County Accotink Pumping Station

Wildlife Refuge

Pe o R a od

L S HOM E E S L E HE T R S NT E RANCE

EL = 67.62 SSD = 263 K = 52 L = 400.00

STA = 588+00.00 EL = 29.67 80_ 70_ 60_ 3 .6 50 50_ 40_ 30_ 20_ 10_ 0_ 3 .8 44 3 .8 32 3 .8 22 3 .1 17 3 .5 15 3 .1 18 3 .8 24 3 .7 35 3 .7 48 3 .7 61 3 .6 74 3 .6 87 4 .6 00 4 .7 11 4 .8 18 4 .1 22 4 .6 21 4 .1 19 4 .6 16 4 .1 14 4 .1 14 K = 60 L = 300.00 SSD = 315 K = 65 L = 200.00 STA = 593+00.00 EL = 42.66

STA = 596+41.60 EL = 40.95 K = 69 L = 200.00

OS D ROP E P CK RD. OHI P

STA = 607+46.18

STA = 612+75.00

R P SD R D F R PO O E G A E O A P R M AR A O N Y R M F O F IF XC U T A K Y O O IK O D P R WA T P HC R A

EL = 39.84 K = 45 L = 300.00 4 .5 36

4 2 1 +. %-. % 0 0 5

-. 5 5 2%4 1 5 +. %

6 2 0 +. %

-. % 2 0 4FAIRFAX COUNTY PARKWAY

POHICK ROAD

E XS IG R FL E ITN P O I

C 7 4 .6 1

4 .9 24

4 .7 35

4 .8 47

4 .8 59

4 .9 71

4 .0 84

4 .0 96

5 .1 08

5 .2 20

5 .3 32

5 .3 44

5 .4 56

5 .5 68

5 .6 80

5 .6 92

6 .7 04

6 .8 16

6 .8 28

6 .2 38

6 .7 42

6 .4 42

6 .3 37

6 .5 27

6 .8 12

5 .4 93

5 .1 69

5 .9 42

5 .6 16

4 .3 90

4 .8 64

4 .1 44

4 .0 29

4 .5 19

4 .6 15

4 .2 17

4 .8 23

-10_ -20_ 585

586

587

588

589

590

591

592

593

594

595

596

597

598

599

600

601

602

603

604

605

606

607

608

609

610

611

612

613

614

615

4 .0 31

616

617

618

E AR A O N Y A K Y O O IK O D L O E R FL F IF XC U T P R WA T P HC R A FY V RP O IANDE ON L RS ANE F RF AI AX COUNTY P ARKW AY ACCOTI NK CRE K E BACKL CK ROAD/ I100_ 90_ 80_ 70_ 60_ 50_ Existing Ground 40_ Proposed Grade BRIDGE LIMITS OVER ACCOTINK CREEK _100 _90 _80 _70 _60 _50 L = 200.00 STA = 105+94.83 EL = 17.81 L = 350.00

STA = 111+39.55 EL = 34.16

STA = 97+50.00 EL = 26.87 STA = 100+00.00 EL = 20.79

P OHI CK ROAD0 . % 1 0

-. % 0 0 530_ 20_ 3 .2 41 3 .2 36 3 .2 31 3 .2 26 3 .2 21 3 .2 16 3 .2 11

0 . % 1 0

_40 _30 _20

-. % 0 0 5

L = 180.00

0 . % 3 0 0 . % 3 0

-. % 2 3 4

L = 200.00

-. % 0 0 53 .2 06 3 .2 01 2 .2 96 2 .2 91 2 .2 86 2 .2 81 2 .2 76 2 .3 70 2 .6 55 2 .2 32 2 .7 12 2 .9 02 1 .9 97 1 .9 92 1 .9 87

-. % 0 0 51 .1 86 1 .1 94

2 .1 12

2 .7 39

2 .7 69

2 .7 99

3 .9 27

3 .8 46

3 .6 57

3 .6 67

3 .6 77

3 .6 87

3 .6 97

10_

0_ 83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

_0 118

E O T 1 R FL R U E PO IY US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1 E R FL N G N O D PA O D O UL EE R P T L G A HR A T M L I A R A - L NA DP O IU E ,02 J N 521


0

4 .2 08

_10

100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa

Fort BelvoirBac klc ik R oadShep ar L d an e

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i u u d rp sd r g Sr t e Po oe Bi e t c r

SWM-4A PondBel o v iC r ou r t

r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm nsAccess Control Point (By Others)ad t Guns on Ro

e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA Wildlife Refuge

ad Ro r Iy

1 T RLPC 1 + 7 1 86.7 7

a od a eR ed M

1 1 6

1 1 7

3 hu Tr 1 T LL1 1 8

Proposed R/WPT 11 2+ 54. 61

1 1 9

11 2

3 hu Tr 2 T RL

10 2

1 T LL

12 2

R m v E ii R i a Bi e e oe x t g ar d r g sn l o d13 2 14 2

15 2

44 04 6 PT 1 + . 8 44 1

PC 17 2 + 52. 83

16 2

+ 49 4189. PC 1

17 2

3 19 2 2 .2 39+ 2 PT 1

18 2

4 11

4 12

43 1

45 1

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

4 16

47 1

19 2

10 3

4 10

1 32

1 33

1 34

S WM 4 P n -B o d

35 1

36 1

37 1

3 18

Existing R/W

11 3

T r Ln s 3 hu a e

Gunston Road Improvements (Under Construction)oad t Guns on R

5 Sidewalk Po oe RW rp sd /


Pohick Road Improvements (Under Construction)

vr ot e o F rB l i

et re t t sS 1

1st Street Improvements (Under Construction)

BACKL CK ROAD/ I

200_ 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ 150_ 140_ STA = 137+74.00 130_ 120_ STA = 126+75.50 110_ 100_ 90_ 80_ 70_ 60_ 50_ L = 250.00 STA = 118+89.12 EL = 41.65 Existing Ground L = 250.00 EL = 68.78 L = 150.00 EL = 96.86

( UNDE CONS R TRUCTI ON)


NE GUNS W TON ROAD BRI DGE

Y US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1

E I TI X S NG GUNS TON ROAD BRI DGE

P OHI CK ROAD

48 1

gw y ih a n h i Rc mo dH

49 1

50 1

51 1

_200 _190 _180 _170 _160 _150 _140 _130

6 . % 2 35 . % 2 7STA = 145+00.00

_120 _110 _100 _90 _80

5 . % 2 70 . % 4 1

EL = 115.49

0 . % 4 14 . % 3 5

4 . % 0 9

4 . % 0 9STA = 131+30.00 EL = 71.01

Proposed Grade

_70 _60 _50 _40

0 . % 1 040_

4 . % 3 5L = 350.00

30_ 20_ 1 00 0 .9 1 26 0 .6 1 52 0 .2 1 77 0 .9 1 03 1 .6 1 29 1 .2 1 54 1 .9 1 81 1 .2 1 07 2 .5 1 33 2 .8 1 60 2 .1 10_ 0_ 116 1 86 2 .4 3 .6 87 3 .6 97 4 .2 08 4 .6 26 4 .9 54 4 .3 89 5 .8 23 5 .3 58 5 .8 92 6 .3 27 6 .3 60 6 .0 83 6 .9 93 6 .8 98 7 .7 04 7 .2 19 7 .7 43 7 .3 78 8 .5 18 8 .6 58 8 .7 98 9 .9 38 9 .1 74

_30 _20 _10 _0 151

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150



0

52 1

3T huL r a ns e

Rc i h mo n dH ih gw a y

Me d R a ae od

10 Asphalt Trail

oad c ik R Poh

100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i l l ai rp sd e in Wa Po oe R t n g r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w yN OR

L mb r R a a et o d

M i eac a t ne n n B ii ud g ln

Cons iuto tt i n Roa d

Wo d w ol n a Q ae u kr

Wo od lw a Ro ad n

M e n h ue et g o s i

C nt co L i o s ut n i t r i m s Wi o t e in Wa t u R tn g h ai l l( oi d M di f e E ii S n l x tg i a sn g )


F rB l i ot e o vrn o ces o t P i A cs C nrl o t (By Others)

Po oe R t n g rp sd e in Wa ai l l

TH

92 . 7 31 PC 1 8+

80 1

20 7 55. PT 1 4+

Po oe RW rp sd /3 .2 60 + 69 1

7 12

2 .8 01 + 69 1 PT 69 1

6 18

PC

7 10


7 11

7 13

e n n a rL tu fT L 1 e s ae uLn Tr 3 h

18 4

19 4

1 sh l ri 0 Ap a Ta t l10 5

Po oe R t n g rp sd e in Wa ai l l-A o d WM 5 P n SWo d w ol n a B pi C uc a tt h r s h

PC 1 55+ 4 9 .4 6 16 5

1 58

1 59

60 1

61 1

Rc m i h o n H d i g wa h y

17 5

3 hu a e T r Ln s

6 12

6 13

n ae rL un T t h g i e 1R ns u a rL h T e 3 ns n a rL u T f et 2L6 15

6 17

13 5

C nt co L i o s ut n i t r i m s Wi o t e in Wa t u R tn g h ai l l

11 5

12 5

14 5

15 5

6 14

ns ae t rL Lf un 2 e Ts e T r Ln 3 hu a r Ln un a e g R hT 1 i t

ns ae uL r h 3T

Sw r u p e e Pm Sa o ti tn

Bel oi Road v r

F rB l i ot e o vr

5S e a i w l d kRl a d e ct o e Sf a F l o b l id t le

6 16

vr e o o d m rvm ns B l iR a I poe e t r i U d r o s ut n (n e C nt co )

Rl a d e ct o e S ce F l ocr id e

ACCE S CONTROL P NT/ S OI

od nR a ig o hn t s Wa

CONS TUTI TI ON ROAD

200_ 190_ 180_ 170_ 160_ Existing Ground 150_ 140_ 130_ 120_ Proposed Grade 110_ L = 100.00 100_ 90_ 80_ 70_ 60_ 50_ 40_ 30_ 20_ 1 60 2 .1 1 86 2 .4 1 12 3 .7 1 39 3 .0 1 65 3 .3 1 91 3 .6 1 17 4 .9 1 42 4 .6 1 53 4 .7 1 48 4 .7 1 34 4 .7 1 20 4 .7 1 06 4 .7 1 92 3 .7 1 81 3 .9 1 76 3 .7 1 71 3 .9 1 66 3 .9 1 61 3 .9 1 56 3 .9 1 51 3 .9 1 46 3 .9 1 41 3 .6 1 28 3 .4 1 04 3 .1 1 68 2 .8 1 22 2 .8 1 73 1 .7 1 24 1 .5 1 75 0 .3 1 29 0 .8 9 .5 94 9 .3 69 9 .2 52 10_ 0_ 149 9 .7 35 L = 320.00 STA = 179+74.80 EL = 98.93 L = 250.00 STA = 156+80.72 EL = 146.54

W OODL AW N ROAD

BE VOI ROAD L R

_200 _190 _180 _170 _160 _150

STA = 172+75.77 EL = 133.31

6 . % 2 3

-. % 1 0 4 -. % 1 0 4-. % 0 0 5L = 400.00 _140 _130 _120

-. % 0 0 5STA = 162+64.06 EL = 138.37

-. 49 2 %

-. 49 2 % -. 49 2 %-. % 1 5 6

_110 _100 _90 _80 _70 _60 _50 _40 _30 _20 _10 _0 184

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183



0

100

PC 1 84+ 69. 9 6

7 18

1 82

7 16

7 17

13 8

E ii RW x tg / sn7 14

7 19

1 81

Me d R a ae od

e r Ln un a g R hT 1 i t ns ae Tr L 3 hu n n ae t rL Lf u 1 e T

PT 1 3+ 8 6 2. 4 2

Rc mo dH g wa i h n ih y

7 15

14 8

6 +2 2 0 90 0 0 + 9 2

901+00

900+00

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

I P ud g M B ii ln Roy209 2 21

H ue os

1 sh l ri 0 Ap a Ta t lPo oe R t n g rp sd e in Wa ai l l E ii RW x tg / snPT 1 3+ 8 6 2. 4 21 81

92 1 1 57 9 +4. PT 1 2

16 8

1 87

1 88

91 1

3 hu Tr L ae ns1 89

3 h Tr uLn ae s

y d ih a n Hg w h i Rc mo

90 1

ns ae Tr L 3 hu ns n ae t rL Lf u 2 e T ns ae Tr L 2 hu e r Ln un a g R hT 1 i t

PC 1 84+ 69. 9 6

13 8

14 8

15 8

9 13

9 14

9 15

9 16

9 17

e r Ln un a g R hT 1 i t s ae T r Ln 2 hu n L n ae t r Lf u 1 e T ns ae Tr L 2 hu202203

1 82

9 18

9 19

200

201

Wo d w S e ol n hl a l21

Soe t s r E xn xo Gs ti a Sa o tn

Gs ti a Sa o tn

204

1 1 2

205

206

So he Wae o s rh ue ( oe ) c sd l Q at In u e ul n S is i y t na F B l i er t e o . vr

7E vn -l e e

5S e a i w l d k Po oe R t n g rp sd e in Wa ai l l C nt co L i o s ut n i t r i m s Wi o t e in Wa t u R tn g h ai l l E ii RW x tg / snOiT f n ao t u o M sn s t H ue os(Modified E ii S n l x tg i a sn g )

M ountVer non M em oralHi i ghw ay

Wo d w ol n a A t C ne uo e t r

Wo d w ol n a Sa l t e bs

M u t en n e oi Hg w y o n V ro M m r l i a a h (n e C nt co , y tes U d r o s ut n B Oh r r i )

207

208

E ii E t ne x t g nr c sn a t b C sd B Oh r o e l e (y tes o )

y wa d ih n Hg h c i mo R

0 21

2

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp M d n Po oe Ln sa e e i Proposed Bridge g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa-A o d WM 6 P n S

1 21

R gr o es

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i l l ai rp sd e in Wa Po oe R t n g r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns e e sn x t g t m , res Wa r as E ii Sra s Ce k, t w y Existing RPA Wildlife Refuge


S ET L E N TV A T R A IEC- H E 6_200 _190

MOUNT VE RNON ME MORI HW Y AL

_180 _170 _160 _150 _140 _130 _120 _110 _100 _90 _80

160_ 150_ 140_ 130_ 120_ 110_ 100_ 90_ 80_ 70_ 60_ 50_ 40_ 30_ 20_ 9 .2 52 9 .7 35 9 .8 18 8 .5 93 8 .7 56 8 .5 08 7 .1 50 6 .1 90 6 .1 30 5 .1 70 5 .1 10 4 .4 55 4 .9 10 10_ 2 .0 80 Existing Ground STA = 185+62.75 EL = 89.24

-. % 1 5 6

L = 380.00

-. 60 0 %Proposed Grade

MUL I L GAN ROAD/

_70 _60

-. 60 0 %_50 _40 _30 _20 3 .0 36 3 .6 20 3 .2 05 2 .7 89 _10 _0 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209

-. % 1 4 5STA = 194+17.43 EL = 37.96 L = 440.00

3 .4 76

0_ 182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

3 .2 52

197

198

199

200


3 21 3 2 05 1 + 4. POT 2

Ga d i rn V w e

C nt co L i o s ut n i t r i m s Wi o t e in Wa t u R tn g h ai l l

lga M uli n Rd

M l a Ra ui n o d l g (n e C nt co ) U d r o s ut n r i (y tes B Oh r )


0

100

200

C L : "1 0 S A E 1= 0

l ydm i L n a Hloo ds

hs P a e2

1

2Bel v i or(Modified Existing Signal)

w k r a P

y a

LEGEND: g rp sd o d ei Po oe R a D s n a rp sd a dcp d e i Po oe Ln sa e M d n g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o Wa

W

(Modified Existing Signal)

m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns

l c ydm i i e L n a H lCrl

POT 61 01 2+ . 62 61 2

PT 609+ 48 39.

608 + 81 PC 607 95.

PC 601 +1 1 9. 3

5 Concrete Sidewalk

1 22 PT 603+9.

PT 600 + 6. 3 2 0

606

605

604

603

609

61 0

607

602

61 1

59 PC 9 598 +5 8 . 1 3

601

T lg a hR a ee rp od

Od lC oc l hs et e R r o a d

W ay

10 Asphalt Trail

(Proposed Signal)

S M W Pn od

Ri c m h ond H

Asphalt

E it P we Ln s xs . o r i e

Trail

3 Travel Lanes

Median

4 Travel Lanes

Sidewalk

E it P o e t Ln xs . r p ry i e

WORTHINGTON WOODS


E it ROW xs .

E it ROW xs .

Existing Townhouses (Beyond)

Existing TrailPROPOSED DIMENSIONS16.5 10-0" TRAIL 8-0" 2.5 5-0" SHLDR 12-0" & VARIES RIGHT TURN LANE 12-0" THRU LANE 12-0" THRU LANE 6-0 MEDIAN 12-0" LEFT THRU LANE 12-0" THRU LANE 12-0" THRU LANE 12-0" 5-0" 4-0" 5-0"

RIGHT TURN LANE SHLDR

SIDEWALK

EXISTING DIMENSIONS

8-0" TRAIL

3 2.5

14-0" RIGHT TURN LANE

12-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE MEDIAN

13-0" LEFT TURN LANE

12-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE


2.5 3

5-0"

SIDEWALK

S C I N1 E TOAsphalt Trail 4 Travel Lanes Median 3 Travel Lanes Sidewalk

SUMNERE it P we Ln s xs . o r i e E it ROW xs . E it ROW xs .P o .ROW rp

CROSSING

E it P o e t Ln xs . r p ry i e


Existing Townhouses (Beyond)

Existing Trail

PROPOSED DIMENSIONS

33

10-0" TRAIL

8 & VAR. 2.5

5-0" SHLDR

14-0" THRU/RIGHT TURN LANE

12-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE

12-0"

6-0

12-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE

12-0"

5-0" 2.5 4-0"

5-0" 2

LEFT TURN LANE MEDIAN

RIGHT TURN LANE SHLDR

SIDEWALK

12.8

EXISTING DIMENSIONS

8-0" TRAIL

3 2.5


12-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE


5 & VAR. MEDIAN

12-0" THRU LANE

12-0" THRU LANE

4-0" 2.5 3 SHLDR

5-0"

2

SIDEWALK

S C I N2 E TO

1 8

1

2

O l Pohi k d c

Right-In Entrance Only

ih g wa y

C L : "4 S A E 1= 00 40 80

LYNDAM HILL

Existing House

LYNDAM HILLExisting House

11.7

598 POT 597 +3 9 . 61

600

2 1 2 0 1 9 1 7

r ns de W her i St eet

LEGEND:Grand View House

i t g rp sd o d ei (l ra v "" Po oe R a D s n A en t e C) i t g rp sd o d ei (l ra v "" Po oe R a D s n A en t e B) a rp sd a dcp d e i Po oe Ln sa e M d n g rp sd i t f y Po oe R h o WaProposed Construction Limits With Retaining Wall Proposed Construction Limits Without Retaining Wall

l l ai rp sd e in Wa Po oe R t n g m s r i rp sd o s ut n i t Po oe C nt co L i r i rp sd o s ut n ae e t Po oe C nt co E sm ns

C u c P o et h rh r p r y A T R A I E" " L E N TV C A T R A I E" " L E N TV B

Woodlawn Baptist Church

Cemetery

Proposed Construction Limits With Retaining Wall

1 Ri h g tT u nL r a n e

3 hu T r L a e n s

Cemetery

1s a e Ln r hu 3TProposed Construction Limits Without Retaining Wall

3T r L hu a e n s

1a e Ln r un fT et 1L n s a e uL r Th 3 a e Ln r un tT g ih 1R

(Modified Existing Signal)

SCALE

SWM Pond (Alternative B) SWM Pond (Alternative C)

0

50

100

(Proposed Signal)

Wo d w B pi C uc o l n a tt h r a s hJune 2012

Asphalt GRAND VIEW HOUSE (BEYOND) Trail

Right Turn Lane 3 Thru Lanes

Left Turn Lane Landscaped Raised Median 3 Thru Lanes Sidewalk

g t f y Ri h o W a

Ri h o W a g t f y

g t f y Ri h o W a

Po o e rp s d

E it g xs i n

E it g xs i n

WOODLAWN BAPTIST CHURCH

Existing Ground

Existing Cemetery Proposed Retaining Wall (Option)

Proposed Cut Slope Without Retaining WallS.B. ROUTE 1

Proposed Cut Slope Without Retaining WallN.B. ROUTE 1

Proposed Retaining0-6"

Wall (Option)8-0" 212-0" 14-0" THRU LANE

PROPOSED DIMENSIONS

3

10-0" TRAIL

12-0" THRU LANE

13-0"


WIDTH VARIES LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN

13-0" THRU LANE

12-0"THRU LANE

14-0"OVERSIZED OUTSIDE LANE

2 4-7"

5-0" 2

RIGHT TURN LANE

THRU LANE

SIDEWALK

- L E N TV C E TO S C I N1 A T R A IEAsphalt Trail Right Turn Lane 3 Thru Lanes Landscaped Raised Median 3 Thru Lanes Sidewalk

Ch r h P o e t uc r p ry

Ro d E s m e t a ae n

E it g xs i n

Ro d E s m e t a ae n

Po o e rp s d

Po o e rp s d

Existing Ground

WOODLAWN BAPTIST CHURCH Existing Gravel Road

S.B. ROUTE 1

N.B. ROUTE 1

0-6" PROPOSED DIMENSIONS 3 10-0" TRAIL 8-0" 2 14-0" THRU LANE 12-0" THRU LANE 13-0" THRU LANE 12-0" LEFT TURN LANE WIDTH VARIES LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN 13-0" THRU LANE 12-0" THRU LANE 14-0" OVERSIZED OUTSIDE LANE 2 4-7" 5-0" SIDEWALK 5-11"

- L E N TV B E TO S C I N1 A T R A IE

o 0 6 0t eh o eL g y P p- i e os H ue

M an i lg ul

5

a ol n Wo d w o as n M ni

4

Mulligan Road Improvements (Under Construction)

m h c i R

d n o

w h g i H

y a

ad Ro

n n a t ne M i eac Building

M n no r Ve nt ou

3e rn V w Ga d i os H ue

M em w gh Hi al i or

ALTERNATIVE CW oodl n Road aw

6

2

m a L

d a o R t r e b

W l l i M s it r Ga ol n Wo d w bs t e Sa l

t r u o sC d o o

ay

1

a ol n Wo d w u kr Q ae i et g o s M e n H ue

a ol n Wo d w h s a tt h r B pi C uc

s l rt ia d Gim l n Distillery

5

L E N TV B A T R A IE2

4

6

1

3

o e e ct Rl a d t le o b l id Sf a F l

o e e ct Rl a d e ocr id S ce F l

d oa rR yo r ve r Su

PLAN - SIGHTLINES

SCALE 0 120 240

Y US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1NOTE: Sightlines are drawn from the anticipated viewing location at each building to the closest visible point on each roadway based on existing and proposed grading.


E R FL N IH L SG T IEP O I SSCALE

MAY 2012

0

50

100

C L : "5 S A E 1= 0

200WOODLAWN QUAKER MEETING HOUSE Alternative C Alternative B Sightline

200

150

150

100

Existing Route 1 (travel lanes)

100

50600 500 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

50

SECTION 1 (Looking East)

200Sightline

WOODLAWN BAPTIST CHURCH

200

150Alternative C

Sightline

150

100Existing Route 1 (travel lanes) Alternative B

100

50

50

400

300

200

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

SECTION

2 (Looking East)

200GRAND VIEW HOUSE Sightline (Alternative B) Sightline (Alternative C) Alternative C

200

150

Alternative B

150

100Existing Route 1 (travel lanes)

100

50

50

0

400

300

200

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0

SECTION

3 (Looking East)

Y US R U E ) IH O D I H RC M N HG WA ( .. O T 1NOTE: Sightlines are drawn from the anticipated viewing location at each building to the closest visible point on each roadway based on existing and proposed grading.


E R FL N IH L SG T IEP O I SSCALE

WOODLAWN MANSION

MAY 2012Sightline (Alternative B) Alternative C (with retaining walls)

0

50

100

C L : "5 S A E 1= 0

200

Sightline (Alternative C) WOODLAWN STABLES (Western Pole Barn) Alternative B

200


150

100

100

50900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

50

0

0

SECTION 4 (Looking East)

WOODLAWN BAPTIST CHURCH Sightline (Alternative C) Alternative B Sightline (Alternative B) Cemetery Alternative C

Sightline (Alternative C)

WOODLAWN MANSION

200

200


150

100900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

100

50

50

SECTION 5 (Looking West)

150Alternative C WOODLAWN WOODLAWN STABLES STABLES (Western Pole Barn) (Eastern Pole Barn) Alternative B Existing Route 1 (travel lanes)

150

100

Alternative B Pond Limts

WOODLAWN STABLES (Outdoor Ring)

100Alternative C Pond LimitsWashington Gristmill and Distillery

50

50

0Existing Mt. Vernon Mem. Hwy. (travel lanes)

0

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

SECTION 6 (Looking North)

StormwaterManagementBasinalong Stormwater Management Basin along Route3inCulpeperCounty,located Route 3 in Culpeper County, located adjacenttoCloverHill(aNational Registereligibleproperty)

StormwaterManagementBasinalong Stormwater Management Basin along Route3inCulpeperCounty,located Route 3 in Culpeper County, located withinMountPonyRuralHistoricDistrict.

StormwaterManagementBasinalong St t M tB i l MeadowCreekParkwayin Meadow Creek Parkway in Charlottesville.

N t n l i oi ai a Hs r o t c L n mak ad r

R ue1I r v me t ot mp o e ns a F r B lor t o t ev i

A t r a ieA l nt e v

P d ok a d cs


S ap Sa l h r e t be C mp e o lx

R nI S e s u -n h d , P d ok, a d cs T an n A e a r iig r nR ue1I r v me t ot mp o e ns a F r B lor t o t ev i

Op n e P su e a tr Ln ad

Ge e a S a l Us A e n r l t be e r a A t r a ieA l nt e v

A e T b lt n ra a uai s o O e P su eL n p n a tr a d _ 2+ c 0 A. R n I S e sP d o k , u -n h d ,a d c s _ +c T ann A e riig ra 7 A.



A t r a ieB l nt e v


E u s ra \ mp e n q e tin I lme t Un e p s d ra s ( p r x 1 1 1 0 ) A p o . 2x 2x 6

S c n ay eo d r Ga e Drv wa t d ie y A c s Fo ce s rm Mo n V r o u t en n Hi h y g wa


Ge e a S a l Us A e s n r l t be e r a A t r a ieB l nt e v

A e T b lt n ra a uai s o O e P su eL n p n a tr a d _ 1+ c 4 A.

R n I S e sP d o k , u -n h d ,a d c s _ +c T ann A e riig ra 6 A.



A t r a ieC l nt e v

N t n l i oi ai a Hs r o t c L n mak ad rC me e y e tr

P i r Drv wa rma y ie y A c s Fo ce s rm Mo n V r o u t en n Hi h y g wa


Op n e P su e a tr Ln ad

Ge e a S a l Us A e s n r l t be e r a A t r a ieC l nt e v

A e T b lt n ra a uai s o O e P su eL n p n a tr a d _ 1+ c 7 A.

R n I S e sP d o k , u -n h d ,a d c s _ +c T ann A e riig ra 6 A.

fhwa public meeting boards june 5, 2012 u.s. widening meeting

Documents