fig. s1; ritter et al. 2010 relative induction of p-irak1 relative induction of p-raf relative...

3
Fig. S1; Ritter et al. 2010 HP87 HP83 HP42 HP4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 p-IRAK1 HP87 HP83 HP42 HP4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 p-RAF HP87 HP83 HP42 HP4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 p-MEK1/2 HP87 HP83 HP42 HP4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 p-Erk1 HP87 HP83 HP42 HP4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 p-Erk2 Relative induction of p- IRAK1 Relative induction of p- RAF Relative induction of p- MEK1/2 Relative induction of p- Erk1 Relative induction of p- Erk2 Relative induction of p- MKK6/3 HP87 HP83 HP42 HP4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 p-MKK6/3

Upload: arron-marshall

Post on 08-Jan-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Supplementary Figure 1. Densitometric analysis H. pylori induced phosphorylation of signal transduction protreins and downstream transcription factors. AGS cells were left untreated or were infected with H. pylori strains HP87, HP83, HP42 a HP4 by MOI 10 (white bars) and by MOI 100 (black bars). 30 minutes after infection cells were harvested and whole cellular extracts were isolated. All diagrams illustrate the data from densitometric analysis of detected bands in Western blots ± S.E.M. from three independent infection experiments. The signals were quantified and normalized to corresponding GAPDH signals in each experiment. The level of posphorylated proteins in non nucleofected cells was set to 1 (not shown) and compared to respective signals in infected cells in each experiment to obtain a relative induction factor. Relative induction of phosphorylated protein levels are presented on Y-axis. H. pylori strains are indicated at the bottom of diagram. Data were analyzed for statistical significance by ANOVA test. The symbol * indicates significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) for H. pylori infected AGS cells versus non infected AGS cells.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fig. S1; Ritter et al. 2010 Relative induction of p-IRAK1 Relative induction of p-RAF Relative induction of p-MEK1/2 Relative induction of p-Erk1 Relative

Fig. S1; Ritter et al. 2010

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP43.6

3.8

4

4.2

4.4

4.6

4.8

5

p-IRAK1

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

p-RAF

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

0.51

1.52

2.53

3.54

p-MEK1/2

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

0.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.61.8

p-Erk1

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

p-Erk2

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-IR

AK1

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-RA

FRe

lativ

e in

ducti

on o

f p-

MEK

1/2

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-Er

k1Re

lativ

e in

ducti

on o

f p-

Erk2

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-M

KK6/

3

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

p-MKK6/3

Page 2: Fig. S1; Ritter et al. 2010 Relative induction of p-IRAK1 Relative induction of p-RAF Relative induction of p-MEK1/2 Relative induction of p-Erk1 Relative

Fig. S1; Ritter et al. 2010

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

p-RSK

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

p-JNK

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

2

4

6

8

10

12

p-ELK

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

p-Jun

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP43.6

3.8

4

4.2

4.4

4.6

4.8

5

p-ATF2

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-RS

KRe

lativ

e in

ducti

on o

f p-

JNK

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-p6

5

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-EL

KRe

lativ

e in

ducti

on o

f p-

Jun

Rela

tive

indu

ction

of

p-AT

F2

* *

**

HP87 HP83 HP42 HP40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

p-p65

Page 3: Fig. S1; Ritter et al. 2010 Relative induction of p-IRAK1 Relative induction of p-RAF Relative induction of p-MEK1/2 Relative induction of p-Erk1 Relative

Supplementary Figure 1. Densitometric analysis H. pylori induced phosphorylation of signal transduction protreins and downstream transcription factors. AGS cells were left untreated or were infected with H. pylori strains HP87, HP83, HP42 a HP4 by MOI 10 (white bars) and by MOI 100 (black bars). 30 minutes after infection cells were harvested and whole cellular extracts were isolated. All diagrams illustrate the data from densitometric analysis of detected bands in Western blots ± S.E.M. from three independent infection experiments. The signals were quantified and normalized to corresponding GAPDH signals in each experiment. The level of posphorylated proteins in non nucleofected cells was set to 1 (not shown) and compared to respective signals in infected cells in each experiment to obtain a relative induction factor. Relative induction of phosphorylated protein levels are presented on Y-axis. H. pylori strains are indicated at the bottom of diagram. Data were analyzed for statistical significance by ANOVA test. The symbol * indicates significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) for H. pylori infected AGS cells versus non infected AGS cells.