final report - world bank · 2016. 7. 13. · federal republic of nigeria rural access and mobility...
TRANSCRIPT
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP I, KADUNA)
CR 4408
ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (ARAP)
OF
PROPOSED OPRC ROADS
MOW & T/KADRAMP/C/12/10
LOT N1, N2, S1, S2
Final Report
RP472 v2 P
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
ed
2 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................ 12
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... 45
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. 45
ACRONYMS......................................................................................................................... 67
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 78
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................... 1213
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.................................................................. 1213
1.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 1213
1.2 Project Components .......................................................................................... 1213
1.3 Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) OP 4.12. ...................................................... 1415
CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................................. 1516
2.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY....................................................................... 1516
2.1 Objective of the ARAP....................................................................................... 1617
2.2 Scope of Work .................................................................................................... 1617
2.2.1 Major Sub-Activities of the ARAP .............................................................. 1617
CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................................... 1718
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ................................................................................ 1718
3.1 Overview of the Project Area .......................................................................... 1718
3.2 Land Use in Project Area and Entitlement Matrix ......................................... 2324
3.3 Socio-Economic Survey of the Project Areas.................................................. 2425
3.3.1 Lot N1 Project Route.................................................................................. 2526
3.3.2 Lot N2 Project Route.................................................................................. 2728
3.3.3 Lot S1 Project Route .................................................................................. 3031
3.3.4 Lot S2 Project Route .................................................................................. 3233
CHAPTER FOUR ............................................................................................................. 3536
4.0 POLICY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK.......................................................... 3536
4.1 World Bank Safeguard Policies ......................................................................... 3536
4.2 Nigeria Regulatory Framework......................................................................... 3536
4.2.1 Land Use Act of 1978 amended 1992 ....................................................... 3536
4.2.2 Forestry Law Cap 55, 1994 ........................................................................ 3637
4.3 Comparison between Land Use Act and World Bank OP 4.12....................... 3637
CHAPTER FIVE ............................................................................................................... 3738
5.0 COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK ........................................................................... 3738
5.1 Introduction........................................................................................................ 3738
3 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
5.2 Entitlement Policy ............................................................................................. 3738
5.3 Eligibility Criteria for Affected Persons .......................................................... 3839
5.4 Proof of Eligibility.............................................................................................. 3839
5.5 Notification ........................................................................................................ 3839
5.6 Method of Valuation for compensation ........................................................... 3940
5.7 Payment of Compensation ................................................................................ 3940
5.8 Entitlement Matrix ............................................................................................ 3940
CHAPTER SIX ................................................................................................................. 4142
6.0 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................. 4243
6.1 Overview of Institutional Responsibilities ...................................................... 4243
6.2 Institutional Arrangement ................................................................................ 4243
6.3 Grievances and Appeals Procedure ................................................................. 4344
6.4 Likely Grievances and Disputes........................................................................ 4344
6.5 Grievance Redress Mechanisms........................................................................ 4445
6.5.1 Informal Grievance and Dispute Resolution Method .............................. 4445
6.5.2 The Complaint Procedure .......................................................................... 4445
6.5.3 Formal Methods of Grievance Resolution ................................................ 4546
CHAPTER SEVEN ............................................................................................................ 4748
7.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION........................................................................ 4748
7.1 Implementation Schedule ................................................................................. 4849
7.2 Capacity and Training Needs ............................................................................ 4950
CHAPTER EIGHT ............................................................................................................ 5051
8.0 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ................................................... 5051
8.1 Introduction........................................................................................................ 5051
8.2 Consultation Objective ..................................................................................... 5051
8.3 Consultation Strategy ........................................................................................ 5051
8.4 Overview of Public Consultations programme ............................................... 5152
8.4.1 LOT N1 ......................................................................................................... 5152
8.4.2 LOT N2 ......................................................................................................... 5253
8.4.3 LOT S1 .......................................................................................................... 5657
8.4.4 LOT S2 .......................................................................................................... 5758
CHAPTER NINE .............................................................................................................. 5960
9.0 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 5960
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 6061
ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................ 6263
Annex 1: Register of Project Affected People (PAPs) .............................................. 6263
Annex 2: Photo Gallery................................................................................................ 8182
4 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Annex 3: Survey Instrument/Sample Questionnaire ................................................ 8384
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2. 1: Reconnaisance Survey along Angwan Kadi and Birnin Yero Communities on project route R 2-10 ............................................................... 1516
Figure 3. 1: Map of Nigeria Showing the Project State - Kaduna State .................... 1718
Figure 3. 2: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot N1...................................... 1819
Figure 3. 3: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot N2...................................... 1819
Figure 3. 4: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot S1 ...................................... 2122
Figure 3. 5: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot S2 ...................................... 2122
Figure 3. 6: Food crops and economic trees in project areas ............................... 2324
Figure 3. 7: ETF School project inaccessible due to poor road.............................. 2324
Figure 3. 8: Form of settlement in the project areas ........................................ 2425
Figure 3. 9: Consultation with women at Angwan Kadi Market on R2-10 Lot N2......... 2829
Figure 8. 1: Consultation & Interviews with Elders and Community Heads at Dundubus5152
Figure 8. 2: Sections of Youths during a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) at Mainasara and Doka respectively................................................................... 5253
Figure 8. 3: Consultation with women in Kwarakwara and Children returning from farm........................................................................................................ 5354
Figure 8. 4: Identified major source of enterprise empowerment for the women folk in Tami .................................................................................. 5354
Figure 8. 5: Consultation with the women and youths selling refreshments in Tami after the days work ....................................................................... 5354
Figure 8. 6: Consultation with PAPs and Community Head at Birnin Yero ................ 5455
Figure 8. 7: Consultation with Community Heads at Tami and Kwarakwara respectively........................................................................................................ 5556
Figure 8. 8: Consultation with the PAPs at Sako and Takanai............................... 5758
Figure 8. 9: Lot S 2 Kushe 1 & 11 Community women, youths and men commuting to the market................................................................................ 5859
Figure 8. 10: Consultation with the PAPs at kushe I and Community Head at Kushe II . 5859
Figure 8. 11: Consultation with Kushe 11 women in Lot S2 ................................. 5960
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Feeder Roads in Lot N1 and Lot N2 of Kaduna North…………………………………….18
Table 3.2: Feeder Roads in Lot S1 and Lot S2 of Kaduna South……………………………………..20
Table 3.3a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot N1…………………………………………………………23
Table 3.3b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot N1………………………………………………………………23
Table 3.3c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot N1………………………………………………………………….23
Table 3.3d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot N1………………………………………………….23
Table 3.3e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot N1………………………………………………………………………24
Table 3.3f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot N1……………………………..24
Table 3.3g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot N1..25
Table 3.4a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot N2………………………………………………………..26
5 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Table 3.4b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot N2………………………………………………………………26
Table 3.4c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot N2………………………………………………………………….26
Table 3.4d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot N1………………………………………………….27
Table 3.4e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot N2……………………………………………………………………….27
Table 3.4f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot N2……………………………….28
Table 3.4g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot N2….28
Table 3.5a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot S1………………………………………………………….28
Table 3.5b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot S1……………………………………………………………….29
Table 3.5c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot S1…………………………………………………………………..29
Table 3.5d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot S1…………………………………………………..29
Table 3.5e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot S1……………………………………………………………………...29
Table 3.5f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot S1……………………………….30
Table 3.5g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot S1….30
Table 3.6a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot S2…………………………………………………………30
Table 3.6b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot S2………………………………………………………………30
Table 3.6c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot S2………………………………………………………………….31
Table 3.6d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot S2………………………………………………….31
Table 3.6e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot S2………………………………………………………………………32
Table 3.6f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot S2……………………………..32
Table 3.6g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot S2..32
Table 4.1: Comparison of Nigerian Land Use Act (1978) and World Bank’s OP 4.12…….34
Table 5.1: Entitlement Matrix……………………………………………………………………………………….37
Table 5.2: Valuation of Compensation Cost for Project Affected Persons………………….37
Table 6.1: Institutional Arrangement and Responsibilities for ARAP………………………….39
Table 7.1: Timetable for Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan ……………………………..45
Table 7.2: Recommended Training and Awareness……………………………………………………..46
Table 8.1: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot N1………………………….48
Table 8.2: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot N2………………………….50
Table 8.3: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot S1………………………….53
Table 8.4: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot S2………………………….54
6 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
ACRONYMS
AIT ARAP Implementation Team
ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan
CBO Community Based Organisation
CLO Community Liaison Officer
DaLA Damage and Loss Assessment
DBO Design Build and Operate
EMP Environment Management Plan
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
FGD Focus Group Discussion
FMARD Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
FSLC First School Leaving Certificate
GCE General Certificate in Education
IDA International Development Authority
KADRAMP Kaduna State Rural Access and Mobility Project
LGA Local Government Area
LRC Local Resettlement Committee
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
7 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
NGOs Non Governmental Organizations
OP Operational Policy
OPRC Output Performance Based Road Contracts
PAPs Project Affected Persons
RAMP Rural Access and Mobility Project
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
RPF Resettlement Plan Framework
RTTP Rural Travel and Transport Programme
SPIU State Project Implementation Unit
WASC West African School Certificate
WB World Bank
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES 1 Introduction
The World Bank in response to the Federal Government of Nigeria request through
the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD) for assistance
in support of the Government policy on Rural Travel and Transport (RTTP) provided
funds through its International Development Association (IDA), the Rural Access and
Mobility Projects (RAMP) are seen as a major way of achieving this.
The RAMP is aimed at improving and enhancing accessibility and mobility in rural
areas. Accessibility and mobility are critical issues in the lives of the rural
population, considering that majority of them are Agriculturalists. Movement of
their agricultural inputs and outputs (produce) is hinged on accessibility and
mobility. Kaduna State is one of the States in the Federation to benefit from the
project. In Kaduna, the RAMP is coordinated by the State Project Coordinating Unit
(SPIU) under the Kaduna State Ministry of Works and Transport.
In the course of implementing the OPRC Roads, a number of environmental and
social safeguards policies will be triggered inclusive of which are Involuntary
Resettlement OP 4.12. However under the World Bank Safeguard Policy, on
8 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
involuntary resettlement, a project is classified as full Resettlement Action Plan
(RAP) when the number of people to be displaced involuntarily is from 200 and
above and/or when the land take involves 10 percent of the total holding. On the
contrary, if the number of people to be displaced or affected is less than 200, and
land take is less than 10 percent of the total holding, it advocates for Abbreviated
Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP).
The outcome showed that there will be minor impacts, and permanent land-take is
less than 10 percent of the total land holdings and therefore an ARAP with
economic rehabilitation will be prepared.
This ARAP would provide a plan, assistance and/or rehabilitation of PAP so that
their losses would be compensated and their standard of living will at least, be
restored to pre-project levels. The ARAP also provides for economic rehabilitation
measures so that income earning potentials of individuals is restored to sustain
their livelihoods.
ES 2 Scope of Work
The scope of work underlying this ARAP is the identification of project impacts and
affected population through the following:
• Use of thematic maps;
• Census that enumerates project affected persons (PAPs) and registers them
according to location;
• An inventory and categorization of the PAPs and assets to be affected;
• Socio-economic assessment of PAPs;
• Analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensation parameters, to design
appropriate income restoration and sustainable development initiatives;
• Identify baseline monitoring indicators; and
• Consultation with affected populations regarding mitigation of impacts and
development opportunities.
ES 3 Approach and Methodology of Social Assessment
Prior to implementation of the resettlement activities, baseline data is collected
and potential impacts are identified and analyzed. Mitigation measures are then
put in place to address negative impacts and compensatory plans are designed and
recommended. Other Key instruments include Public Consultation, focus group
discussions and detailed field visit and collection of data using household survey
Field visits were conducted across the communities of the project affected area of
influence. An inventory of the PAPs was taken as well as the baseline information
of the project areas.
9 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
ES 4 Impacts of the Project
The impacts of the road project as it concerns the social aspect are categorized
into positive and negative impacts. Whereas the positive impacts are more, the
negative impacts are minimal and were found to be those that the project can
through compensation and stakeholder collaboration with the affected project
communities address as appropriate.
Positive Impacts include
• Easy access to market and business;
• Reduction in the rate of accidents due to poor road;
• Improve condition of living due to easy movement of input and output by
farmers and business people;
• Reduction in travel time per kilometer
Negative Impacts includes:
• Temporary disturbance to access to business and movement;
• Land take resulting from minor road realignment in some places;
• Destruction of economic trees;
• Temporary Reduction in income and livelihoods;
Negative impacts are neutralized via involuntary resettlement plan.
ES 5 Entitlement Matrix
The entitlement matrix shows the categories of applicable losses and impacts as
well as the eligibility conditions and nature of entitlement. This is presented in
table below:
CATEGORY TYPE OF LOSS APPLICABLE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ENTITLEMENTS
10 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Loss of farm land
Yes Evidence of ownership Must be supported by evidence of census undertaken during the survey
Compensation at full replacement cost value
Farmers
Loss of agricultural crops
Yes Lease contract, rental receipts, MOU Must be supported by evidence of census undertaken during the survey
Compensation at current market price of produce
Loss of economic tree
Yes Evidence of census before cut off data Must be supported by evidence of census undertaken during the survey
Compensation at full replacement cost value
Economic tree owners
Loss of income Yes Apply to fruit bearing trees
Compensation of value of sales of fruit (where applicable) at one period
Loss the entire structure
No Not applicable No compensation required Housing
Loss of part of the structure
No Not applicable No compensation required
Aesthetic and cultural property
Burial ground, shrine, monument
No Not applicable No compensation required
ES 6 Indicative Budget for ARAP Implementation
The total indicative budget for the ARAP implementation is Twenty One million,
Eight Hundred and Ninety-two Thousand, Thirty-Six Naira, Seventy-Six Kobo Only (N
21, 892,036.76). This is comprised as shown in the table below:
Estimated Cost (Naira) Cost Item
N1 N2 S1 S2
Period of
Expenditure
Compensation of PAPs
3,807,931.60 2,811,920 941,000 941,000 Before Construction Phase
ARAP Capacity building
1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 Before Construction Phase
Monitoring & Evaluation
1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 Before & during construction
Sub-Total 6,657,931.60 5,661,920 3,791,000
3,791,000
Contingency (10% of Sub-Total)
665,793.16 566,192 379,100 379,100
Total 7,323,724.76 6,228,112 4,170,100 4,170,100
Overall Total 21, 892,036.76
ES 7 Implementation and Responsibility
It is expected that the implementation of the ARAP will be completed before the
commencement of construction works. The timetable for the implementation of
the Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan and responsibilities is presented in the
table below.
11 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
ROAD PROJECT CYCLE
PHASE ACTIVITIES DATE RESPONSIBILITIES
PLANNING
Scoping and
Screening
� Initial site visit & consultations.
� Identification of Resettlement and Social issues
� Application of safeguard policies
� Categorization
� Action plan
� Screening Report
� WB No-Objection
December 2010
Consultant; Supervision by KADRAMP- SPIU
Preparation of ARAP
and consultations
� Draft ARAP
� Consultations
� WB No-Objection
May 2011 Consultant; Supervision by KADRAMP -SPIU
Disclosure � Disclosure of ARAP locally & to WB Info Shop
July 2011 KADRAMP –SPIU
World Bank
DESIGN
Finalization and
Incorporation
� Final version of ARAP
� Incorporation of ARAP into contract documents
� WB No-Objection
August 2011 Consultant; Supervision by
KADRAMP –SPIU
EXECUTION Implementation and Monitoring
Construction Work
� Implementation
� Monitoring & reporting on environmental and social mitigation measures
� Monitoring and reporting of Resettlement and livelihood issues
August 2011
September 2011
September 2011
Contractors Supervision by KADRAMP -SPIU/ M&E and the community
OPERATIONS (POST-IMPLEMENTATION)
Operations and maintenance
� Maintenance
� Monitoring and reporting of Resettlement and social livelihood issues
Contractors Supervision by KADRAMP-SPIU/ and the community
12 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 Background
Nigeria with a land area of 924,000 sq. km, has an estimated population of 139.8 million, growing at a rate of 2.7 percent annually, is the most populous country in Africa and the largest in West Africa. The country is mostly dominated by rural population (around 70 percent) with agriculture as their main income. In the past years, Nigeria experienced strong economic growth, with agriculture a major contributor to the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Nigeria’s rural transport infrastructure has been identified as a crucial component for the economic development of the country by linking the rural communities to the urban areas. Most of the rural roads are in poor condition, and impose significant cost to the national economy especially to the agricultural activities due to increased vehicle operating costs and travel times.
The World Bank in response to the Federal Government of Nigeria’s request, through the
Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD) for assistance in support of
the Government policy on Rural Travel and Transport (RTTP) provided funds through its
International Development Association (IDA). The Rural Access and Mobility Projects
(RAMP) are seen as a major way of achieving this. The RAMP is aimed at improving and
enhancing accessibility and mobility in rural areas. Accessibility and mobility are critical
issues in the lives of the rural population, considering that majority of them are
Agriculturalists. Movement of their agricultural inputs and outputs (produce) is hinged on
accessibility and mobility. Kaduna State is one of the States in the Federation to benefit
from the project. In Kaduna, the RAMP is coordinated by the State Project Coordinating
Unit (SPIU) under the Kaduna State Ministry of Works and Transport.
1.2 Project Components
RAMP has two components, Component A: Upgrading, Rehabilitation and Maintenance of
Transport Infrastructure; and Component B: Institutional Strengthening, Reforms and
Capacity Building. The activities within each one of these two components are detailed
below:
A) Component A: Upgrading, Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Transport Infrastructure
The rural transport infrastructure component of the project will support the upgrading,
rehabilitation and maintenance of about 427 km (subject to ongoing design work) of rural
roads selected from the top prioritized intervention areas and about 132 river crossings
spread across the entire state. Depending on traffic volume and other considerations,
about 142 km of roads (or one third of the total length) will be upgraded to bituminous
surface dressed standards while the rest or about 285 km will be to gravel wearing course
standards.
There will be two sub-components within Component A:
13 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
a. Improvement and maintenance of roads within six intervention areas of the state
through long term output and performance based contracting (OPRC), and
b. Construction and rehabilitation of selected river crossings across the entire state.
This component demands for an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to ensure an
environmentally sustainable project.
Component A which involves civil works is made up of Output Performance based Road
Contracts (A1) and River crossing (A2).
The Output Performance based Road Contracts (OPRC) makes up 60% and is aimed at
improving and/or upgrading the existing rural feeder roads and tracks. On the other hand,
the River Crossing makes up 40% of this component and is aimed at rehabilitating rivers
crossings, culverts, etc.
There are two categories of roads under OPRC; the existing paved roads which are
degraded and require re-sealing, and existing unpaved roads and tracks which would be
upgraded to gravel/laterite surface dressed roads.
B) Component B: Institutional Strengthening, Reforms and Capacity Building.
This component will focus on:
a. Supporting project implementation by providing the necessary goods, materials and
equipment and by ensuring the existence of the appropriate project management
capacity and skills at both the federal and the state levels;
b. Strengthening the capacity of the public sector to manage road network, a sub-
component that would cover rationalization of the current establishment and
enhancement of skills in strategic planning, program and project scheduling,
designing, implementation and maintenance in relation to rural road
infrastructure;
c. Development and implementation of institutional reforms with a view to enhancing
efficiency in resource allocation, procurement, and quality control responsibilities
at the State Government level;
d. Other cross cutting issues such as awareness creation and related work on road
safety, gender and Human Immuno-deficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immune-
deficiency Syndrome (AIDS); and
e. Preparation of state funded follow-on RAMP project.
The overall project development outcome is to improve accessibility and mobility to and
among the rural communities in Kaduna State. A total number of forty (40) rural feeder
roads have been selected and subdivided into 4 lots with 2 lots each in southern and
northern parts of Kaduna.
In some places, the road rehabilitation and expansion will require acquisition of land,
destruction of farm crops within the right of way (ROW) and falling of economic trees to
achieve the required span width. More so, some of the roads directly pass through villages
14 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
where there is insufficient space for widening which may result in the demolition of
houses. This triggers the World Bank operational policy (OP) 4.12 (Involuntary
Resettlement).
However, the scoping survey reveals that less than 10 percent of total land hold will be
taken and it anticipates that PAPs will be less than 200. Therefore, a full RAP will not be
required; rather the right instrument to be used is the Abbreviated Resettlement Action
Plan (ARAP).
1.3 Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) OP 4.12.
This is triggered when project activities cause physical displacement, restriction or access
to source of livelihood and land acquisition. During civil works, major and minor impacts
tend to cause displacement of population, productive assets and buildings. In the advent
of major impacts (if affected people will be physically displaced and more than 10% of
their productive assets are lost or more than 200 people are to be displaced), while a full
RAP would be prepared for minor impacts (that is, if affected people are not physically
displaced and less than 10% of their productive assets are lost or fewer than 200 people
are to be displaced), an Abbreviated Resettlement Plan (ARP) would be approved
This ARAP is prepared in compliance with all Federal, State and Local laws of Nigeria and
especially the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP/BP 4.12.
The core requirements of the World Bank Safeguards Policy OP / BP 4.12 – Involuntary
Resettlement - which is addressed in the ARAP are as follows:
• Avoid or minimize involuntary resettlement where feasible, exploring all viable
alternative project designs.
• Assist project affected persons in improving their former living standards, income
earning capacity, and production levels, or at least in restoring them back to the
former status
• Encourage community participation in planning and implementing resettlement.
• Provide assistance to affected people regardless of the legality of land tenure.
In this project minor impacts are anticipated, therefore it would be appropriate to
prepare an Abbreviated Resettlement Plan (ARAP).
15 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
Resettlement planning is necessary whenever displacement or relocation occurs as part of
project activities in order to mitigate adverse impacts. The methodology for this study
included;
• Harmonization of project schedule and scope with the client;
• Collection of relevant documents and literature materials;
• Reconnaissance survey of the local government areas and communities where
project will take place to scope and identify the magnitude of impacts;
• Staff organization and training;
• Review of various documents including:
o RAMP ESMF Report,
o Project Appraisal Document (PAD)
o World Bank safeguard policy on involuntary resettlement, and
o Baseline socio-economic survey of the project areas
• Public Consultation and focus group discussions: This was continuous and a
major thrust throughout the project, for identifying PAPs, informing the
communities about the proposed project, eliciting their concerns and possible
mitigation measures to proposed impacts.
Figure 2. 1: Reconnaisance Survey along Angwan Kadi and Birnin Yero Communities on project route R 2-10
16 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
2.1 Objective of the ARAP
This ARAP aims to provide the detailed compensation process to mitigate any negative
impact as a result of the RAMP project activities that may result in the loss of assets or
acquisition of lands or disruption to means of livelihood. Specifically, this ARAP has the
following objectives:
• Identify all affected persons and making inventory/census of all of them
• Identify the most vulnerable ones along the corridors who could be affected
• Assist to define ways of assisting all affected persons in their efforts to improve
their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real
terms, to at least pre-displacement levels
• Identify and spell out institutional roles and responsibilities for implementing
the ARAP
• Identify measures for strengthening organizational capacity/capability
• Provide mechanism for redressing and resolving all grievances
• Develop a social monitoring plan under the projects to ensure that all social
issues are managed effectively.
2.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work underlying this ARAP is the identification of project impacts and
affected population through the following:
• Thematic maps;
• Census that enumerates project affected persons (PAPs) and registers them
according to location;
• An inventory and categorization of the PAPs and assets to be affected
• Socio-economic assessment of PAPs
• Analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensation parameters, to design
appropriate income restoration and sustainable development initiatives;
• Identify baseline monitoring indicators
• Consultation with affected populations regarding mitigation of impacts and
development opportunities.
2.2.1 Major Sub-Activities of the ARAP
In the preparation of the ARAP, stakeholders were sensitized of the project. The following
were carried out:
• Census and socioeconomic survey of the PAPs and Households;
• Consultations and discussions with the communities including PAPs;
• Categorization and valuation of assets to be affected;
• Preparation of an entitlement matrix detailing the PAPs names, affected assets
and costs;
• Preparation of a budget and time table for the ARAP implementation.
• Establishing a mechanism for Grievance resolution.
17 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
3.1 Overview of the Project Area
Kaduna State lies between latitude 90 02′N – 110 32′N and longitude 60 15’E – 80 50′E. With a
lot of rock outcrops which vary in height up to 1370m above sea level and an undulating
landscape. Kaduna State has a dense network of drainages with Rivers Kaduna and Gurara
being the two major rivers. The state shares boundaries with Zamfara ,Katsina and Kano
states to the North, to the East, it is bounded by Plateau and Bauchi States, to the South,
it is bounded by the Federal capital Territory as well as Nassarawa state, and to the West,
it is bounded by Niger state as shown in figure 3.1 below.
Figure 3. 1: Map of Nigeria Showing the Project State - Kaduna State
Under the RAMP road Project in the State, Forty (40) rural feeder roads have been
selected and subdivided into four (4) Lots namely; Lot N1, Lot N2, Lot S1 & Lot S2.
The LOT N1 & LOT N2 of the RAMP project are located in the Northern part of the State with 9 and 8 roads in each LOT respectively; while LOT S1 & LOT S2 are located in the Southern Part of the State with 11 and 13 roads in each Lot respectively as shown in the figures and tables below.
18 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 3. 2: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot N1
Figure 3. 3: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot N2
19 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Table 3.1: Feeder Roads in Lot N1 and Lot N2 of Kaduna North
20 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
21 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 3. 4: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot S1
Figure 3. 5: Map showing the Selected Roads in Lot S2
22 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Table 3.2: Feeder Roads in Lot S1 and Lot S2 of Kaduna South
23 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
3.2 Land Use in Project Area and Entitlement Matrix
The land use of the Project site is prominently for agricultural purposes: crop planting and
livestock rearing. Therefore farmlands and economic produce (trees, food and cash crops)
will be the assets most likely to be compensated for. This deems it fit to acknowledge that
all PAPs are considerably subsistence farmers (as a primary occupation).
The project areas in the northern lots have the soil that is good for production of yam and
maize; while in the well watered southern lots, the rich darker soils are used for
cultivating cereals, cassava, rice and the famous Southern Kaduna ginger.
Figure 3. 6: Food crops and economic trees in project areas
The settlement form is dispersed. A farming compound typically comprises two or three
closely related households, such as father with married sons or married brothers. Each
household within a compound is an independent economic unit which farms separately and
has its own cluster of houses, kitchen areas, grain-drying platform, granaries and livestock
enclosures. Most structures are of mud-brick with thatched roof or galvanized corrugate
metal sheets. There are school structures, primary health care centres built in some of
the project areas but are inaccessible because of the poor condition of the roads.
Figure 3. 7: ETF School project inaccessible due to poor road
Rural electrification poles were cited in some areas and some millennium development project for boreholes in some farmlands.
24 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 3. 8: Form of settlement in the project areas
There are no houses or major structures to be affected by the road project. The identified PAPs are therefore entitled to compensation for loss of land, economic trees and agricultural economic trees by farmers and loss of income by traders. Their compensation will be at full replacement/ market cost value of assets for the farmers and income compensation for the duration of the ‘disturbance’. These are in line with information reported in the ARAP report except the exclusion of the Market men and women at Angwan Kadi who are bound to be affected by the project, as they will be required to evacuate that part of the road during construction and will therefore loose income for that period of time.
3.3 Socio-Economic Survey of the Project Areas
A socio-economic survey was conducted within the four Lots of the RAMP Project sites.
Data was collected on the existing socioeconomic attributes of the respondents in the
project locations.
The Socio-economic survey for the project areas was conducted between 8th December
2010 and 10th March 2011. This was further re-evaluated between the periods 4th October -
7th October 2011. The socio-economic survey was premised on PAPs, with a view to
determining their existing socio-economic conditions, and how the project impact may
affect them. Specifically, the following thematic socio-economic indicators were
examined:
• Gender
• Age Distribution
• Marital Status
• Level of Education
• Nature of trade/Occupation of PAPs
• Income category
• Health Status
25 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
3.3.1 Lot N1 Project Route
Table 3.3a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot N1
LOCATION OF PAPS No of PAPs (63) MALE (%) FEMALE (%) TOTAL (%)
Ungwan Liman 20 100 0 100
Madaka 2 100 0 100
Ungwan Kanawa 4 100 0 100
Gangara 20 100 0 100
Doka 10 100 0 100
Ungwan Danbada 7 100 0 100
The table above illustrates that all PAPs are males; this may be connected with the fact
that the ownership of farms and crops culturally belong to the Household heads who from
the survey were all identified as males. The females and children identified during the
survey are dependants of the male Household heads and are thus indirectly affected by
the Project. There are 63 PAPs in this Project Location.
Table 3.3b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot N1
Age
0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 >60
Location
No % No % No % No % No %
Total (no)
Ungwan Liman 0 0 0 0 8 12.5 10 77.5 2 66.6 20 Madaka 0 0 0 0 1 4.2 1 7.5 0 0 2 Gangara 0 0 0 0 2 8.3 1 7.5 1 33.4 4 Ungwan Kanawa 0 0 0 0 1 4.2 1 7.5 0 0 2 Doka 0 0 0 0 10 41.6 0 0 0 0 10 Ungwan Danbada 0 0 0 0 7 29.2 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 0 29 100 13 100 3 100 45 Distribution as ratio of sum of PAPs
0% 0% 64.4% 28.9% 6.7% 100%
Table 3.3b above indicates the age distribution of PAPs in the affected project areas.
64.4% of the PAPs identified are within 31-45 years old, 28.9% fall within 46-60 years while
the elderly persons of 60 years and above constitute 6.7% of PAPs.
Table 3.3c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot N1
PROJECT AREA MARRIED % (Monogamy)
MARRIED % (Polygamy)
SINGLE %
Ungwan Liman 0.47 0.43 0
Madaka 0 0.07 0
Ungwan Kanawa 11.8 0.07 0
Gangara 11.8 0 0
Doka 17.6 0.25 0
Ungwan Danbada 11.8 0.17 0
Total 0.38 0.62 0
The result of the survey shows that all identified PAPs are married; hence there is no
unmarried PAP as indicated in Table 3.3c above. 62% of PAPs are married with at least two
wives while 38% of PAPs are married to one wife.
Table 3.3d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot N1
26 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
PROJECT AREA None (%) Pri (%) Sec (%) Post (%) Total
Ungwan Liman 0.45 0.38 0.17 0 1.0
Madaka 0 100 0 0 1.0
Ungwan Kanawa 0.25 0.75 0 0 1.0
Gangara 0.50 0.50 0 0 1.0
Doka 0.60 0.40 0 0 1.0
Ungwan Danbada 0.40 0.55 0.05 0 1.0
Key
None No formal education
Pri Attended Primary education
Sec Attended secondary education
Post Attended post secondary education
Table 3.3d above indicates the educational attainment of PAPs. In Ungwan Kanawa project
area, primary education is the highest qualification for 75% of PAPs while 25% others did
not have any form of formal education. In Gangara, 50% of PAPs had primary education
only while the remaining 50% did not have any formal education. In Doka, 60% have no
formal education and 40% had primary education while in Ungwan Danbada project area
40% had no formal education and 55% had primary education.
Overall, it is evident that majority of PAPs across the project areas did not have the basic
education. This implies that PAPs belong to the class of illiterates and may be
disadvantaged in terms of employment or ability to earn alternative means of livelihood.
Table 3.3e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot N1
Description of Means of Livelihood (figures in percent)
Location Farming Hunting Tea seller Civil Servants Others
Total
Ungwan Liman 0.97 0 0.3 0 0 1.0
Madaka 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
Ungwan Kanawa 0.98 0 0 0 0.02 1.0
Gangara 0.98 0.02 0 0 0 1.0
Doka 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
Ungwan Danbada 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
From the survey and as presented in table 3.3e above, Farming is the major form of
occupation in all the communities in Lot N1.
Table 3.3f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot N1
Ungwan Liman
Madaka Ungwan Kanawa
Gangara Doka Ungwan Danbada
Mean %
Income Category (In Naira)
% % % % % % %
0-4999 0.46 0.38 0.50 0.48 0.56 0.36 0.45
5,000 – 9,999 0.50 0.59 0.50 0.52 0.44 0.64 0.54
10,000 – 20,000 0.04 0.03 0 0 0 0 0.01
Above 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
27 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Table 3.3f above depicts the income capacity of PAPs in the project areas. On the average
45% of PAPs fall within an income less than N5000 per month while 54% earn between
N5000 to N10, 000 per month. The result across board shows that no PAP earns as much as
N20, 000 per month, while only 0.1% of PAPs earn income above N10, 000 monthly.
The trend in income distribution in the project area projects that PAPs are low income
earners. This is evident by the nature of their subsistence farming occupation.
Table 3.3g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot N1
Table 3.3g above depicts that the most prevailing and re-occurring sicknesses amongst
most PAPs households is malaria. It defines that the probability of a member of the PAPs
household falling ill to malaria at any given time is 45% for PAPs in Ungwan Liman,
Madaka, Gangara and Doka. While the least probability for the occurrence of malaria is
12% in Ungwan Kanawa. The chance of occurrence for typhoid is also high in the project
areas. Incidences of meningitis and cholera seem to be prevalent and high amongst PAPs
from Ungwan Liman.
3.3.2 Lot N2 Project Route
There are 100 PAPs in this project Area. The table below illustrates that there are more
males PAPS and are dominated in Birnin Yero community.
There are 10 female PAPs mainly market women who came with their children to the
Tashar Sabon Birni (Rigachikun) area where the R2-10 road begins. The female PAPs are
engage in trade of foodstuffs and livestock.
Sicknesses and Health Conditions Experienced by a Member of
Household in the last 2 Years
Location
Malaria Typhoid Leprosy Meningitis TB Cholera
Ungwan Limani 0.45 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.12
Madaka 0.45 0.45 0 0.02 0 0
Ungwan Kanawa 0.12 0.1 0 0.04 0 0.02
Gangara 0.45 0 0 0 0 0.045
Doka 0.45 0.45 0 0.02 0 0
Ungwan Danbada 0.15 0.1 0 0.04 0 0.02
28 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 3. 9: Consultation with women at Angwan Kadi Market on R2-10 Lot N2
Table 3.4a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot N2
LOCATION OF PAPS No of PAPs (100) MALE (%) FEMALE (%) TOTAL
Angwan Kadi 19 47.4 52.6 100
Labar 9 100 0 100
Dadin Kowa 4 100 0 100
Masache 3 100 0 100
Kwarakwara 16 100 0 100
Tami 17 100 0 100
Ungwan Madauchi 2 100 0 100
Birnin Yero 30 100 0 100
Table 3.4b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot N2
Age
0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 >60
Location
No % No % No % No % No %
Total (no)
Angwan Kadi 0 0 0 0 10 52.6 9 47.4 0 0 19
Labar 0 0 0 0 6 66.7 3 33.3 0 0 9
Dadin Kowa 0 0 0 0 1 25 2 50 1 25 4
Masache 0 0 0 0 2 66.7 1 33.3 0 0 3
Kwarakwara 0 0 0 0 10 62.5 4 25 2 12.5 16
Tami 0 0 0 0 10 58.8 6 35.2 1 6 17
Ungwan Madauchi
0 0 0 0 1 50 1 50 0 0 2
Birnin Yero 0 0 0 0 20 66.7 8 26.7 2 6.6 30
Column Total 0 0 60 34 6 100 Distribution as ratio of sum of PAPs
0% 0% 60% 34.% 6% 100%
Table 3.4b above indicates the age distribution of PAPs in the affected project areas. 60%
of the PAPs identified are within 31-45 years old, 34% fall within 46-60 years while the
elderly persons of 60 years and above constitute 6% of PAPs.
Table 3.4c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot N2
PROJECT AREA MARRIED % (Monogamy)
MARRIED % (Polygamy)
SINGLE %
Angwan Kadi 15.7 84.2 0
Labar 0.46 0.44 0
29 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Dadin Kowa 0 0.07 0
Masache 11.8 0.07 0
Kwarakwara 11.8 0.06 0
Tami 17.6 0.25 0
Ungwan Madauchi 11.8 0.17 0
Birnin Yero 0.40 0.50 0
Total 0.38 0.65 0
The result of the survey shows that all identified PAPs are married; hence there is no
unmarried PAP as indicated in Table 3.4c above. 65% of PAPs are married with at least two
wives while 38% of PAPs are married to one wife.
Table 3.4d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot N1
PROJECT AREA None (%) Pri (%) Sec (%) Post (%) Total
Angwan Kadi 0.45 0.50 0.05 0 1.0
Labar 0.40 0.36 0.24 0 1.0
Dadin Kowa 0.25 0.75 0 0 1.0
Masache 0 100 0 0 1.0
Kwarakwara 0.50 0.50 0 0 1.0
Tami 0.45 0.38 0.17 0 1.0
Ungwan Madauchi 0.60 0.40 0 0 1.0
Birnin Yero 0.40 0.55 0.05 0 1.0
Key
None No formal education
Pri Attended Primary education
Sec Attended secondary education
Post Attended post secondary education
Table 3.4d above indicates the educational attainment of PAPs. All PAPs in Masache are
Primary School leavers. Only PAPs from Labar (24%), Tami (17%) and Birnin Yero (0.5%)
have any form of Secondary education while Kwarakwara have an equal number of PAPs
(50% each) with primary or no form of education.
Table 3.4e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot N2
Description of Means of Livelihood (figures in percent)
Location Farming Hunting Tea seller Civil Servants Others
Total
Angwan Kadi 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0
Labar 0.97 0 0.3 0 0
Dadin Kowa 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
Masache 0.98 0.02 0 0 0 1.0
Kwarakwara 0.98 0 0 0 0.02 1.0
Tami 0.98 0.02 0 0 0 1.0
Ungwan Madauchi 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
Birnin Yero 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
From the survey and as presented in table 3.4e above, Farming is the major form of
occupation in the communities in Lot N2 while all PAPs are traders dealing in foodstuff and
livestock sales.
30 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Table 3.4f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot N2
Angwan Kadi
Labar Dadin Kowa
Masache Kwara kwara
Tami Ungwan
Madauchi
Birnin
Yero
Mean
%
Income Category (In Naira)
% % % % % % % % %
0-4999 0 0.50 0.45 0.50 0.48 0.52 0.42 0.36 0.46
5,000 – 9,999 0 0.46 0.53 0.50 0.52 0.48 0.55 0.60 0.52
10,000 – 20,000 1.0 0.04 0.02 0 0 0 0.03 0.04 0.14
Above 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 100 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Table 3.4f above depicts the income capacity of PAPs in the project areas. On the average
46% of PAPs fall within an income less than N5000 per month while 52% earn between
N5000 to N10, 000 per month. The results across board shows that no PAP earns as much
as N20, 000 per month, while 14% of PAPs earn income above N10, 000 monthly.
The trend in income distribution in the project area projects that PAPs are low income
earners. This is evident by the nature of their subsistence farming occupation.
Table 3.4g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot N2
Table 3.4g above depicts that the most prevailing and re-occurring sicknesses amongst
most PAPs households is malaria while typhoid seem to be prevalent in Dadin Kowa, Tami
and Ungwan Madauchi.
3.3.3 Lot S1 Project Route
Table 3.5a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot S1
LOCATION OF PAPS No of PAPs (11) MALE (%) FEMALE (%) TOTAL
Takanai 4 100 0 100
Sako 7 100 0 100
Sicknesses and Health Conditions Experienced by a Member of
Household in the last 2 Years
Location
Malaria Typhoid Leprosy Meningitis TB Cholera
Labar 0.40 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.12
Dadin Kowa 0.45 0.45 0 0.02 0 0
Masache 0.13 0.1 0 0.04 0 0.02
Kwarakwara 0.42 0 0 0 0 0.045
Tami 0.45 0.43 0 0.02 0 0
Ungwan Madauchi 0.45 0.40 0 0.02 0 0
Birnin Yero 0.15 0.1 0 0.04 0 0.02
31 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
There are 11 PAPs in this project Area. The table above illustrates that all PAPs are males
4 of which are in Takanai and 7 in Sako.
Table 3.5b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot S1
Age
0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 >60
Location
No % No % No % No % No %
Total (no)
Takanai 0 0 0 0 3 75 1 25 0 0 4 Sako 0 0 0 0 2 28.6 4 57.1 1 14.3 7 Column Total
0 0 0 0 5 100 5 100 1 100 11
Distribution as ratio of sum of PAPs
0% 0% 45.45% 45.45% 9.01% 100%
Table 3.5b above indicates the age distribution of PAPs in the affected project areas.
45.45% of the PAPs identified are within 31-45 years old & 46-60 years while the elderly
persons of 60 years and above constitute 9.01% of PAPs.
Table 3.5c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot S1
PROJECT AREA MARRIED % (Monogamy)
MARRIED % (Polygamy)
SINGLE %
Takanai 0.60 0.32 0
Sako 0.39 0.40 0
Total 0.64 0.36 0
The result of the survey shows that all identified PAPs are married; hence there is no
unmarried PAP as indicated in Table 3.5c above. 36% of PAPs are married with at least two
wives while 64% of PAPs are married to one wife.
Table 3.5d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot S1
PROJECT AREA None (%) Pri (%) Sec (%) Post (%) Total
Takanai 0.30 0.20 0.40 0.10 1.0
Sako 0.25 0.65 0.10 0 1.0
Key
None No formal education
Pri Attended Primary education
Sec Attended secondary education
Post Attended post secondary education
Table 3.5d above indicates the educational attainment of PAPs. 40% of the PAPs at
Takania have secondary formal education while 65% of the PAPs at Sako have Primary
formal education. 30% of the identified PAPs at Takania have no formal education while
25% of the PAPs at Sako also have no formal education.
Table 3.5e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot S1
Description of Means of Livelihood (figures in percent)
32 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Location Farming Hunting Tea seller Civil Servants Others Total
Takanai 0.97 0 0.3 0 0 1.0
Sako 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
From the survey and as presented in table 3.5e above, Farming is the major form of
occupation in all the communities in Lot S1.
Table 3.5f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot S1
Takanai Sako Mean % Income Category
(In Naira)
% % %
0-4999 0.46 0.38 0.42
5,000 – 9,999 0.50 0.59 0.55
10,000 – 20,000 0.04 0.03 0.035
Above 20,000 0 0 0
Total 100% 100% 100%
Table 3.5f above depicts the income capacity of PAPs in the project areas. On the average
42% of PAPs fall within an income less than N5000 per month while 55% earn between
N5000 to N10, 000 per month. The result across board shows that no PAP earns as much as
N20, 000 per month, while only 0.35% of PAPs earn income above N10, 000 monthly.
The trend in income distribution in the project area projects that PAPs are low income
earners. This is evident by the nature of their subsistence farming occupation.
Table 3.5g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot S1
Table 3.5g above depicts that the most prevailing and re-occurring sicknesses amongst
most PAPs households is malaria while typhoid seem to be prevalent in Sako.
3.3.4 Lot S2 Project Route
Table 3.6a: Gender Distribution of PAPs in Lot S2
LOCATION OF PAPS No of PAPs (21) MALE (%) FEMALE (%) TOTAL
Kudiri Kagarko 1 100 0 100
Kushe 1 13 100 0 100
Kushe II 6 100 0 100
Gora Kachia 1 0 100 100
There are 21 PAPs in this project Area. The table above illustrates that the only female
PAP was in Gora Kachia while all other PAPs are males of which 13 are from Kushe I, 6 are
from Kushe II and Kudiri Kagarko has only 1 respondent.
Sicknesses and Health Conditions Experienced by a Member of
Household in the last 2 Years
Location
Malaria Typhoid Leprosy Meningitis TB Cholera
Takanai 0.45 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.12
Sako 0.45 0.45 0 0.02 0 0
33 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Table 3.6b: Age Distribution of PAPs in Lot S2
Age
0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 >60
Location
No % No % No % No % No %
Total (no)
Kudiri Kagarko
0 0 0 0 1 100 0 0 0 0 1
Kushe 1 0 0 0 0 10 77 3 23 0 0 13 Kushe II 0 0 0 0 5 83 1 17 0 0 6 Gora Kachia 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100 0 0 1 Column Total
0 0 0 0 16 100 5 100 0 0 21
Distribution as ratio of sum of PAPs
0% 0% 76.2% 23.8% 0% 100%
Table 3.6b above indicates the age distribution of PAPs in the affected project areas.
76.2% of the PAPs identified are within 31-45 years old and the remaining 23.8% are within
46-60 years.
Table 3.6c: Marital Status of PAPs in Lot S2
PROJECT AREA MARRIED % (Monogamy)
MARRIED % (Polygamy)
SINGLE %
Kudiri Kagarko 0.53 0.43 0
Kushe 1 0.51 0.49 0
Kushe II 11.8 0.07 0
Gora Kachia 0.20 0 0
Total 0.54 0.46 0
The result of the survey shows that all identified PAPs are married; hence there is no
unmarried PAP as indicated in Table 3.6c above. 46% of PAPs are married with at least two
wives while 54% of PAPs are married to one wife.
Table 3.6d: Educational Attainment of PAPs in Lot S2
PROJECT AREA None (%) Pri (%) Sec (%) Post (%) Total
Kudiri Kagarko 0.48 0.38 0.14 0 1.0
Kushe 1 0.25 0.70 0.05 0 1.0
Kushe II 0.25 0.75 0 0 1.0
Gora Kachia 0 1.0 0 0 1.0
Key
None No formal education
Pri Attended Primary education
Sec Attended secondary education
Post Attended post secondary education
Table 3.6d above indicates the educational attainment of PAPs. The result shows that the
highest ratio (48%) of PAPs in Kudiri Kagarko did not have any formal education while 38%
and 14% represent PAPs whose highest form of education are primary and secondary school
respectively. For Kushe I, 25% of the PAPs did not have any formal education , while 70%
and 5% had primary and secondary education as highest qualifications respectively.
34 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
For Kushe II project area, primary education is the highest qualification for about 75% of
PAPs while 25% others did not have any form of formal education. In Gora Kachia, primary
education is the highest form of education for 100% of PAPs in the project area.
Table 3.6e: Occupation of PAPs in Lot S2
Description of Means of Livelihood (figures in percent)
Location Farming Hunting Tea seller Civil Servants Others
Total
Takanai 0.97 0 0.3 0 0 1.0
Sako 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0
From the survey and as presented in table 3.6e above, Farming is the major form of
occupation in all the communities in Lot S2.
Table 3.6f: Income Earning Category of PAPs per month in Lot S2
Kudiri
Kagarko
Kushe 1 Kushe II Gora Kachia Mean % Income
Category
(In Naira) % % % % %
0-4999 0.46 0.38 0.50 0.48 0.46
5,000 – 9,999 0.50 0.59 0.50 0.52 0.53
10,000 – 20,000 0.04 0.03 0 0 0.01
Above 20,000 0 0 0 0 0
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Table 3.6f above depicts the income capacity of PAPs in the project areas. On the average
46% of PAPs fall within an income less than N5000 per month while 53% earn between
N5000 to N10, 000 per month. The result across board shows that no PAP earns as much as
N20, 000 per month, while only 0.1% of PAPs earn income above N10, 000 monthly.
The trend in income distribution in the project area projects that PAPs are low income
earners. This is evident by the nature of their subsistence farming occupation.
Table 3.6g: Common Health Conditions amongst PAPs Household Members in Lot S2
Sicknesses and Health Conditions Experienced by a Member of
Household in the last 2 Years
Location
Malaria Typhoid Leprosy Meningitis TB Cholera
Kudiri Kagarko 0.45 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.12
Kushe 1 0.45 0.45 0 0.02 0 0
Kushe II 0.20 0.1 0 0.04 0 0.02
Gora Kachia 0.45 0 0 0 0 0.045
35 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Table 3.6g above depicts that the most prevailing and re-occurring sicknesses amongst
most PAPs households is malaria while typhoid seem to be prevalent in Kushe I.
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 POLICY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
The following policy and regulatory frameworks guided the preparation of this ARAP:
4.1 World Bank Safeguard Policies
The World Bank Group is made up of two unique development institutions owned by 187
member countries: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and
the International Development Association (IDA).
Each institution plays a different but collaborative role in advancing the vision of inclusive
and sustainable globalization. The IBRD aims to reduce poverty in middle-income and
creditworthy poorer countries, while IDA focuses on the world's poorest countries.
Their work is complemented by that of the International Finance Corporation (IFC),
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) and the International Centre for the
Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
The relevant policy on ARAP is set out in the World Bank’s OP 4.12 (Involuntary
Resettlement). OP 4.12 applies whenever property must be acquired, or its use modified,
for a project, and that acquisition or modification results in the loss of income, residence
or access to resources, whether permanent or temporary and whether the occupation is
legal or illegal.
With respect to this ARAP, the OP 4.12 is applied.
4.2 Nigeria Regulatory Framework
4.2.1 Land Use Act of 1978 amended 1992
The land-use Act of 1978 states that it is “in the public interest that the rights of all
Nigerians to use and enjoy land in Nigeria in sufficient quality to enable them to provide
for the sustenance of themselves and their families” through assured, protected and
preserved environmental amenities. In the event of use of land for public interest, the Act
specifies as follows:
36 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
o That the government should resettle and/or compensate occupants of land with
Certificate of Occupancy (C of O); or
o Issue notice to occupiers of land prior to displacement of land for public project.
4.2.2 Forestry Law Cap 55, 1994
The Forestry Act 1958 which was amended as the Forestry Law CAP 55 (1994) prohibits any
act that may lead to the destruction of or cause injury to any forest produce, forest
growth or forestry property in Nigeria. The law prescribes the administrative framework
for the management, utilization and protection of forestry resources in Nigeria.
4.3 Comparison between Land Use Act and World Bank OP 4.12
Table 4.1: Comparison of Nigerian Land Use Act (1978) and World Bank’s OP 4.12
CATEGORY NIGERIAN LAND USE ACT WORLD BANK
Land Owners Cash compensation based upon
market value
Recommends land-for-land
compensation, or cash
compensation at replacement cost.
Land Tenants Entitled to compensation based
on the amount of rights they hold
upon land.
Entitled to some form of
compensation subject to the legal
recognition of their occupancy.
Land Users Not entitled to compensation for
land; entitled for compensation
for crops
Entitled for compensation for crops
and September be entitled for land
replacement and income loss
compensation for minimal of the
pre-project level.
Owners of Non
permanent Buildings
Cash compensation based on
prevailing market value
Entitled to in-kind compensation or
cash compensation at full
replacement cost including labour
and relocation expenses, prior to
displacement.
Owners of permanent
Buildings
Cash compensation based on
prevailing market value
Entitled to in-kind compensation or
cash compensation at full
replacement cost including labour
and relocation expenses, prior to
displacement.
This ARAP for the road project will be aligned with the World Bank Operational Policy (OP
4.12) which indicates best practices to rehabilitation of livelihoods of people affected by
the implementation of the project. Hence, where there are gaps between the Land Use
Act (1978) and the World Bank Policy (OP 4.12), in regard to compensation of PAPs, the
World Bank’s Policy will apply since it is to fund the project.
37 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK
5.1 Introduction
Valuation of assets to be affected by the implementation of the project was conducted
using a general principle adopted in the formulation of the compensation valuation which
follows the World Bank’s Policy that lost income and asset will be valued at their full
replacement cost such that the PAPs should experience no net loss.
The asset valuation was conducted by a qualified economist based on the current market
prices in the concerned state of project influence.
5.2 Entitlement Policy
Since the project entails the rehabilitation of existing feeder road network, we do not
anticipate new land take except for pockets of alignment anticipated to evolve.
Therefore, land take will be small and will not lead to full resettlement of persons. The
ARAP policy will therefore, focus on compensation of PAPs.
The study also established that there will be no physical displacement of households. This
means that incidences of relocation will not occur; hence giving of assistance to persons
for movement is not anticipated.
38 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
5.3 Eligibility Criteria for Affected Persons
Any person who will suffer loss or damage to an asset, farmland, crop, trade or loss of
access to productive resources, as a result of the project will be considered eligible for
compensation and/ or resettlement assistance.
The cut-off date for being eligible for compensation and/ or assistance was the 10th March
2011, which is the last day during which the inventory of PAPs was completed.
PAPs include:
• Those who have formal legal rights of land (including customary and traditional
rights recognized under the laws of the country.
• Those who do not have formal rights to land at the time the census begins but have
a claim to such land or assets and become recognized during the survey; and
• Those who have no recognizable legal rights or claim to the land they are
occupying.
However only PAPs enumerated during the baseline survey shall be eligible for any form of
compensation. Any other person that lay claim to, or occupy a property or plant any kind
of tree on the ROW of the road after the cut of date is not eligible for compensation.
5.4 Proof of Eligibility
The SPIU will consider various forms of evidences as proof of eligibility as stated in the
RPF, to cover the following:
• Identification by household head or head of clan justifying that the claimer is the
true PAP whose name and identity was documented
• In the case of land, there must be an evidence of ownership of land or a letter with
postal stamp and signed by a recognized community leader stating that the person
is/was an occupant of the property (with description) which was enumerated.
However only PAPs enumerated during the baseline survey shall be eligible for the
compensation.
5.5 Notification
All properties affected by the proposed civil works have been valued and assessed
according to laid down procedure.
Owners of affected properties have been notified in several ways. These included one on
one notification during the socio-economic survey, and also during public consultation. A
compensation valuation of all affected properties was carried out to assess
commensurable values.
39 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
5.6 Method of Valuation for compensation
The method has been briefly described below:
• Replacement Cost Method
Current Market value of asset within the project area was used to determine the
compensation rate for Economic Trees and land. This was determined via market survey of
land per square meter and the market prices of the affected Trees in the project areas.
In the case of economic tree the DaLA methodology was applied. DaLA method is an
initiative of the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). DaLA method
is used in this study to determine compensation for economic trees because of its
robustness and advantage over the traditional method of assessing the cost of an economic
tree. DaLA method states that market value of yield per tree for the current season
(agricultural season) and cost of re-planting and nursery should be used to determine the
compensation rate for the economic tree while the Traditional Method equates the capital
of the existing structure/ tree to the cost of reinstating the structure/ tree on the same
plot at the current labour, material and other incident costs.
• Land Resettlement
The World Bank OP 4.12 requires that displaced owners of land be provided with an area
of land equivalent to their displaced land. It states that land restoration should be in a
location that has similar value as the one displaced to the project. However, land
resettlement will not occur since land take is small and will not warrant a physical
displacement of persons.
Also importantly, the issue of land take by the project has been addressed and agreed
upon by the stakeholders during the public consultation that compensation be given to
PAPs for their land resources.
5.7 Payment of Compensation
Payment of compensation will be made by the Resettlement and Compensation
Committee. This committee will include members of the SPIU and selected community
leaders from the affected locations. Compensation benefits shall be settled before the
construction phase of the project.
5.8 Entitlement Matrix
The entitlement matrix shows the categories of applicable losses and impacts as well as
the eligibility conditions and nature of entitlement. This is presented in Table 5.1 below.
Table 5.1: Entitlement Matrix
Category Type of Loss Applicable Eligibility Criteria Entitlements
40 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Loss of farm land
Yes Evidence of ownership
Must be supported by evidence of
census undertaken during the
survey
Compensation at full
replacement cost value
Farmers Loss of agricultural
crops
Yes Lease contract, rental receipts,
MOU
Must be supported by evidence of
census undertaken during the
survey
Compensation at current
market price of produce
Loss of economic
tree
Yes Evidence of census before cut off
data
Must be supported by evidence of
census undertaken during the
survey
Compensation at full
replacement cost value +
Economic tree
owners
Loss of income Yes Apply to fruit bearing trees Compensation of value of
sales of fruit (where
applicable) at one period
Loss the entire
structure
No Not applicable No compensation required Housing
Loss of part of the
structure
No Not applicable No compensation required
Aesthetic and
cultural
property
Burial ground,
shrine, monument
No Not applicable No compensation required
Based on the Entitlement Matrix and Valuation procedures, the full compensation
valuation was done and the breakdown of the costing by categories is given in Table 5.2
below:
Table 5.2: Valuation of Compensation Cost for Project Affected Persons
LOT N1
LOCATION NO OF PAPS COMPENSATION
FOR FARM LANDS
COMPENSATION FOR
ECONOMIC TREE
TOTAL
Madaka 2 226,320 78,000 304,320
Ungwan
Kanawa 4 179,400 117,000 296,400
Gangara 20 1,174,891.60 624,000 1,798,891.6
Ungwan Limani 20 276,000 413,000 689,000
Doka 10 267,720 52,000 319,720
Ungwan
Danbaba 7 165,600 234,000 399,600
Total 63 2,289,931.60 1,518,000 3,807,931.60
LOT N2
LOCATION NO OF
PAPS
COMPENSATION
FOR FARM LANDS
COMPENSATION
FOR ECONOMIC
TREE
COMPENSATION
FOR LOSS OF
INCOME
TOTAL
Angwan Kadi 19 0 0 218,400 218,400
Labar 9 405,720 208,000 0 613,720
41 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Dadin Kowa 4 57,960 52,000 0 109,960
Masache 3 63,480 78,000 0 141,480
Kwarakwara 16 231,840 156,000 0 387,840
Tami 17 184,960 130,000 0 314,960
Ungwan Madauchi 2 93,840 91,000 0 184,840
Birnin Yero 30 554,720 286,000 0 840,720
Total 100 1,592,520 1,001,000 218,400 2,811,920
LOT S1
LOCATION NO OF PAPS COMPENSATION
FOR FARM LANDS
COMPENSATION FOR
ECONOMIC TREE
TOTAL
Takanai 4 226,320 104,000 330,320
Sako 7 532,680 78,000 610,680
Total 11 759,000 182,000 941,000
LOT S2
LOCATION NO OF PAPS COMPENSATION
FOR FARM LANDS
COMPENSATION FOR
ECONOMIC TREE
TOTAL
Kudiri Kagarko 1 480,240 624,000 1,104,240
Kushe 1 13 215,280.00 195,000 410,280
Kushe II 6 215,280.00 156,000 371,280
Gora Kachia 1 82,800.00 78,000 160,800
Total 21 993,600 975,000 2,046,600
Attached at Annex 1 is a detailed list of cost compensation for individual PAPs.
CHAPTER SIX
42 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
6.0 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITIES
6.1 Overview of Institutional Responsibilities
A key element of any resettlement plan implementation and management is the
appropriate institutional framework that will ensure the timely establishment and
functioning of the team or agency mandated to implement the plan.
The major institutions that are involved in the Resettlement process are the Kaduna Rural
Access and Mobility project (KADRAMP), the World Bank, Local NGOs/CBOs and the ARAP
Implementation Team (AIT) which comprises:
• The RAMP Project Coordinator , SPIU
• The Development Communication Officer, SPIU
• SPIU M&E officer
• SPIU Environmental and Social Officer
• SPIU Legal Adviser (Ministry of Justice)
• Representative of the Project Financial Management Unit
• Representative of Kaduna State Ministry of Lands, Survey and Country Planning.
Four local NGOs (one for each of Lot) with experience in social and sustainable
development programs are proposed to be recruited by AIT to assist in implementing this
ARAP and to help in assuring the social acceptability and sustainability of the programs.
The RAMP EMP Lead will facilitate the training of the NGOs on resettlement policy and
practices. They will be locally based and have sufficient manpower and leadership.
These NGOs will:
• Counsel the Project Affected Persons;
• Encourage productive utilization of compensation packages;
• Assist the PAPs to organize CBOs and cooperatives who can represent the PAPs during any negotiations and grievance hearings
6.2 Institutional Arrangement
The roles and responsibilities of the institutions regarding Resettlement Implementation
and Grievance redress are as per Table 6.1.
Table 6.1: Institutional Arrangement and Responsibilities for ARAP
S/No Stakeholders/
Institutions
Responsibilities
1 KADRAMP • Establishment of Local Resettlement Committee (LRC).
• Ensuring that the project conforms to World Bank safeguard policies, including implementation of the Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP), as required.
• Engaging the services of contractors and consultants to carryout preparation and implementation of ARAP and subsequent engaging the service of external monitors for the ARAP implementation.
• Approval of payments to consultants for ARAP activities carried out under the project.
• Internal monitoring and evaluation of ARAP activities.
43 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
• Preparation of quarterly and annual progress reports on ARAP implementation.
• Submission of Reports to KADRAMP, and World Bank for review.
2 World Bank • Overall responsibility of ensuring that the OP 4.12 is complied with in the ARAP.
• Responsible for the final review, clearance and approval of the ARAP.
3 Monitoring and Evaluation Officer from the KADRAMP
• Ensure that there are sufficient resources (time, money and people) to supervise the implementation of compensation
• Ensure that any changes during implementation process that have significant
environmental or social impact are communicated to the KADRAMP in time and advice
on actions to be taken and costs involved.
• Ensure that the SPIU is sufficiently informed on monitoring results.
4 Local Resettlement Committees (LRCs)
• Being responsible for guiding compensation and resettlement activities in Local areas.
• Form a survey team to carry out Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) for affected PAPs and assets; finalize DMS and Entitlement forms for each PAP.
• Checking the unit prices of compensation as used in RP, suggestions for adjusting the unit prices in conformation with market prices/replacement costs (if required) to Project Implementation Unit for approval.
• In co-ordination with KADRAMP, organize meetings with PAPs, communal authorities disseminate copies of Resettlement Information Booklet (RIB) and entitlement forms.
• Based on the policy and proposed process/mechanism in ARAP, the LRCs prepare the detailed implementation plan (quarterly) and the together with KADRAMP pay entitlements to PAPs and implement for other activities in a timely manner.
• Settling the complaints and grievances raised by complainants and suggest solutions for the outstanding issues to responsible institutions for improving of the ARAP implementation.
• Organize seminars to disseminate the ARAP report to relevant stakeholders, communities, etc.
• Assisting local people in overcoming the difficulties during the implementation period.
5 Project Affected Persons (PAPs)
• Giving their own opinions and, or support on alternative project designs during Focused Group Discussion,
• Support Community- based developmental project.
6.3 Grievances and Appeals Procedure
The objectives of the grievance and disputes settlement mechanism are to:
• prevent the resort to adhoc self-help steps and violence on the part of the
affected local population as a means of resolving grievances/disputes arising
from implementation of the ARAP and the project in general;
• provide an accessible platform and simple procedures for the effective and
peaceful settlements of grievances and disputes in the implementation of the
ARAP;
• avoid as much as possible the need to have recourse to litigation and or
external intervention in the settlement of grievance/disputes; and
• to accomplish a speedy, inexpensive and mutually satisfactory resolution of
disputes.
6.4 Likely Grievances and Disputes
Drawing from documented types of dispute in the environment, interaction in relation to
characteristics of the study area, grievances and dispute may emanate from any of the
following circumstances:
44 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
• Disagreements/complaints over identification of lands, structures and other
resources eligible for compensation;
• Disagreements/complaints over/on plan to pay cash compensation based on the
Kaduna State Government rates;
• Disagreements/complaints regarding the compensation entitlements of non-
indigenous population of the project area;
• Disagreements/complaints over under-payments by officials administering
compensation money payment or cost of relocation.
• Disagreements/complaints over misapplication/administration of compensation
money; and
• Disagreements/complaints relating to project’s employment, training and
recruitment policies and procedures.
6.5 Grievance Redress Mechanisms
A Grievance Redress Committee will be set up by KADRAMP to address complaints from
ARAP implementation. This committee will be directly under the KADRAMP-SPIU and its
members will include legal and accounts representatives of KADRAMP, and the legal expert
from the ministry shall be the secretary. The functions of the Grievance Redress
Committee are:
• Provide support to PAPs on problems arising from loss of private properties and
business area.
• Record the grievance of the PAPs, categorize and prioritize the grievances that
need to be resolved by the committee; and
• Report to the aggrieved parties about the developments regarding their
grievances and the decision of the project authorities.
The main objective of this procedure will be to provide a mechanism to mediate conflict
and cut down on lengthy litigation, which often delays such infrastructural projects. It will
also provide people who might have objections or concerns about their assistance, a public
forum to raise their objections and through conflict resolution, address these issues
adequately.
Mechanisms for disputes resolution can be broadly categorized as formal and informal. The
formal method is adjucatory, while the informal method involves the settlement of
disputes by simple and amicable/interactive means. The ARAP proposes to adopt the
informal mechanism for the resolution of all grievances and disputes.
6.5.1 Informal Grievance and Dispute Resolution Method
The ARAP informal grievance and dispute resolution method will revolve around the
mediation and conciliation procedures. These processes and procedures are suitable to the
project area rural population. Given their literacy level, the simplicity and transparency of
these procedures will serve them well.
6.5.2 The Complaint Procedure
The complaint procedure shall be simple, open and transparent. There shall be simple
complaint/grievance forms for use in recording and documenting complaints from
complainants. In all cases, the grievance form shall contain the details about the
complainant, the nature of complain, department/authority of the person against whom
45 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
the complaint/grievance is made, the remedy/correction sought, the time-frame and the
officer/unit responsible for the resolution of the dispute.
Complaints, which may be oral or written can be made or forwarded to the Projects
Grievance Resolution Officer through the Community Liaison Officer (CLO). Where an
illiterate complainant makes an oral complaint, the CLO shall record same in writing into
the complaint form and explain same to the understanding of the complainant before
forwarding the form to the Project’s Grievance Resolution Officer or other appropriate
officer(s)/departments/committee responsible for the resolution of the
complaint/dispute.
The Project Grievance Resolution Officer shall upon receipt of any complaint invite the
complainant, listen and interact amicably with the complainant and arrive at an honest
and reasonable resolution of the grievance/disputes if the dispute falls within the scope of
his authority.
Where the Grievance Resolution Officer is unable to resolve the dispute or where the
complaint is beyond his scope of authority, he shall immediately refer the complaint to
the Project Development Communication Officer who shall hear and address the
complaint or resolve the dispute.
6.5.3 Formal Methods of Grievance Resolution
It is hoped that most disputes will be amicably resolved through the informal process for
dispute resolution. In the event that the informal process is unable to resolve a particular
dispute for whatever reason, the complainant can make use of the formal methods of
dispute resolution as provided below:
(1) First Order Mechanism
This level deals essentially with written complaints/petitions addressed to the Project’s
Development Communication Officer, either by the Project Grievance Resolution Officer
or by a complainant who is not satisfied with the decision of the Project Grievance
Resolution Officer.
Where such formal complaints are received, the Project’s Development Communication
Officer shall, after evaluating the facts and supporting evidence on the complaint respond
promptly and appropriately in not more than one week from the date when the
complaint/dispute was first received.
In the event that the Projects Development Communication Officer considers a dispute to
be complex or potentially sensitive, he shall not hesitate to seek the immediate assistance
and intervention of traditional leadership, respected/responsible community members, or
the local government council to resolve the complaint/dispute.
Where the complaint borders on monetary or other claims that require the approval or
ratification of the Project Management, the Development Communication Officer shall
promptly seek for approval.
(2) Second Order Mechanism
Complaints/disputes that cannot be successfully settled by the Development
Communication Officer, at the first order process, may be referred to the Second Order
mechanism for resolution. The Second Order mechanism requires the establishment of a
RAMP project Grievance/Disputes Resolution Committee, saddled with the responsibility of
46 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
mediating and resolving all complaints/disputes formally referred to it. The Committee
shall comprise the following persons:
a) 2 representative of Kaduna State Government (SPIU top management staff)
b) 1 representative from each of the host communities
c) 2 representatives from the Farmers union (if available)
d) 3 representatives of women
e) 1 representative of the non-indigenous population
f) 1 representative from the Local Government Councils
g) 1 representative from NGO community
h) 1 representative each of the contractors and
i) 1 representative of the consultant
j) 1 representative of Kaduna State Ministry of Lands, Survey and Country Planning.
The committee will provide ample opportunity to redress complaints informally, in
addition to the existing formal administrative and legal procedures. However, the major
grievances that might require mitigation include:
• PAPs not listed;
• Losses not identified correctly;
• Inadequate assistance;
• Dispute about ownership;
• Delay in disbursement of assistance and improper distribution of assistance.
Recommendations made by this Committee for the resolution of complaints/disputes shall
be accepted and promptly implemented by the project proponent.
(3) Third Order Mechanism
This involves the reference of a complaint/dispute to the courts for judicial resolution. An
aggrieved person who is not satisfied with decision of the Project’s Disputes Resolution
Committee may proceed to a court of competent jurisdiction for resolution. Where
litigation is pending, the Project shall suspend the processing of claims or consideration of
any issue relating to claims before the court until the matter is finally disposed off.
The ARAP shall at all times prefer the resolution of disputes using all other methods and
recourse to the court shall be only after the exhaustion of all the informal mechanisms.
47 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
CHAPTER SEVEN
7.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are standard requirements of any management plan
including Resettlement Action Plans. Monitoring is an on-going activity to track project
progress against planned tasks. It is essentially used to provide regular oversight of the
implementation of an activity in terms of input delivery, work schedules, targeted
outputs, etc. through routine data gathering, analysis and reporting.
The WB’s safeguard policy (OP 4.12) states that the project sponsor is responsible for
adequate Monitoring &Evaluation (M&E) of the activities set forth in the resettlement
plan. Monitoring will provide both a warning system for the project sponsor and a channel
for the affected persons to make known their needs and their reactions to resettlement
execution.
The implementation of the ARAP will be regularly supervised and monitored by the
Monitoring and Evaluation officer in coordination with the Environmental and Social
Development Officer.
The M&E activities and programs should be adequately funded and staffed. In-house
monitoring may need to be supplemented by independent external monitors to ensure
complete and objective information.
The objectives of the ARAP monitoring activities are to:
• Ensure that actions and commitments described in the ARAP are completed in a
timely and efficient manner;
• Confirm that eligible PAPs receive their compensation entitlements in full and
within agreed timeframes;
• Monitor effectiveness of completed actions in enhancing or restoring affected
peoples’ living standards and income levels;
• Check that any grievances expressed by PAP are followed through and that,
where necessary, appropriate corrective action is implemented;
A Three tier monitoring framework is recommended for the KADRAMP ARAP Project, these
are:
• Field Level Monitoring by field social and livelihoods facilitators
• Internal Monitoring undertaken by KADRAMP SPIU
48 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
• External monitoring by a third party independent resettlement specialist
and/or a local NGO supported by KADRAMP SPIU.
The three components of the monitoring plan are: Performance Monitoring, Impact
Monitoring and Completion Audit. Each type of monitoring will require the use of suitable
indicators.
a) Performance monitoring Indicators will include:
• Timely disbursement of compensation;
• Appropriate disbursement of compensation to eligible persons and communities
• Accurate quantum of disbursement to eligible persons and communities
b) Impact monitoring indicators will include:
• Short, medium and long term benefits of the resettlement activities.
• Short, medium and long term changes in livelihood and income of persons and
communities receiving compensation packages
• Sustainability of compensation and enhancement packages.
c) The completion audit ideally should be conducted by a suitably qualified external
consultant, the purpose of which is essentially to determine if the proponents efforts to
restore the living standards of affected people has been well conceived and executed.
7.1 Implementation Schedule
The timetable for the implementation of the Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan is
presented in Table 7.1. It is expected that the implementation of the ARAP programme
will be completed by October 2011 to permit for commencement of construction work in
November 2011.
Table 7.1 : Timetable for Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan
ROAD PROJECT CYCLE
PHASE ACTIVITIES DATE RESPONSIBILITIES
PLANNING
Scoping and
Screening
� Initial site visit & consultations.
� Identification of Resettlement and Social issues
� Application of safeguard policies
� Categorization
� Action plan
� Screening Report
� WB No-Objection
December 2010
Consultant; Supervision by KADRAMP- SPIU
Preparation of ARAP
and consultations
� Draft ARAP
� Consultations
� WB No-Objection
May 2011 Consultant; Supervision by KADRAMP -SPIU
Disclosure � Disclosure of ARAP locally & to WB Info Shop
October 2011 KADRAMP –SPIU
World Bank
DESIGN
Finalization and
Incorporation
� Final version of ARAP
� Incorporation of ARAP into contract documents
� WB No-Objection
October/ November 2011
Consultant; Supervision by
KADRAMP –SPIU
49 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
EXECUTION Implementation and monitoring
Construction Work
� Implementation
� Monitoring & reporting on environmental and social mitigation measures
� Monitoring and reporting of Resettlement and livelihood issues
November 2011
November ‘11
November ‘11
Contractors Supervision by KADRAMP -SPIU/ M&E and the community
OPERATIONS (POST-IMPLEMENTATION)
Operations and maintenance
� Maintenance
� Monitoring and reporting of Resettlement and social livelihood issues
Contractors Supervision by KADRAMP-SPIU/ and the community
7.2 Capacity and Training Needs
Based on the assessment of the institutional capacities of the KADRAMP for the
implementation of the ARAP, it is recommended that KADRAMP Contract technical
assistance to provide training and operational support to the project implementation unit
(SPIU) and other agencies involved in the ARAP implementation. The training needs are
identified as per Table 7.2.
Table 7.2: Recommended Training and Awareness
Item Description Course Content Target Estimated Amount(N)
Involuntary Resettlement and Rehabilitation
1. Principles of Resettlement Action Plan
2. Monitoring & Evaluation of ARAP Implementation
3. Conflict Management and Resolution in ARAP
1. SPIU-KADRAMP 2. Conflict
redress/management committee members
700,000 Training & Awareness
Sensitization and Awareness on ARAP process
3. Community representative officers
4. SPIU-KADRAMP Officer
350,000
Sub-Total 1,050,000
50 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
CHAPTER EIGHT
8.0 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
8.1 Introduction
Consultation is defined by the World Bank (1996) as ‘the soliciting of people’s views on a
proposed action and engaging them in a dialogue.’ It is an interactive Two-Way flow of
information, ideas and opinions between stakeholders and project proponent. It is
pertinent as a process of informing the community of the need for sitting a project in their
domain, the scope and the need for the community to own and safeguard the project as
beneficiaries and stakeholders. It also affords an opportunity for input and feedback
information, aimed at strengthening the development project and avoiding negative
impacts or mitigating them where they cannot be avoided.
Therefore, the consultation process and outcome was seen by the consultant as both an
early and mandatory exercise in terms of the objective of project sustainability and as the
best strategy to achieving the overall scope of the activities of the project.
8.2 Consultation Objective
Key objectives of the consultations held during the socio-economic survey:
• To provide information/explanations on the proposed project activities
• To seek participation of the host communities
• To identify stakeholder interests and concerns
• To create avenues for addressing stakeholders concerns and integrating them into
the project design, operations and management
• To enhance the project by learning from the expertise and experience of
individuals, professionals, communities and organizations within the project area.
8.3 Consultation Strategy
The Public Consultation process for the project began during the early stage of
reconnaissance level-survey. The consultant had familiarization meetings with the
proponent and the various stakeholders including the project communities. The consultant
also received assistance of the KADRAMP with the provision of its staff which enhanced
51 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
locating the project communities and interaction with the leaders and potential project
affected persons (PAPs).
8.4 Overview of Public Consultations programme
8.4.1 LOT N1
A familiarization visitation was made between December 5th and 7th to the various
institutions and concerned stakeholders and the community leaders, and the outcome
was:
• Scheduling of meeting dates which was to incorporate a larger audience from the
various stakeholders.
• Organization of locations for the public consultations
• Awareness creation on the intention to carry on a census of all affected property
and persons.
The second–level of the public consultation held at various project areas including Ungwan
Liman, Madaka, Ungwan Kanawa, Doka, Ungwan Danbaba, Dudunbus and Gangara. These
are the locations where ARAP activities were anticipated. Concerns and queries raised
across the areas were the same, indicating the homogenous characteristics of the project
area and of the effects of the rehabilitation work.
Figure 8. 1: Consultation & Interviews with Elders and Community Heads at Dundubus
Table 8.1 below is the list of attendance at the public consultations in Lot N1.
Table 8.1: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot N1
52 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 8. 2: Sections of Youths during a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) at Mainasara and Doka respectively
8.4.2 LOT N2
A familiarization visitation was made to the various institutions and concerned
stakeholders and the community leaders.
The second –level of the public consultation held at various project areas including
Angwan kadi, Labar, Dadin Kowa, Masache, Kwarakwara, Tami, Ungwan Madauchi and
Birnin Yero. These are the locations where ARAP activities were anticipated.
S/N NAMES LOCATION
1 Ayuba Saidu (Mai-Ungwa) Madaka
2 Umaru Salis Madaka
3 Ishaya Danbawa (Mai-Ungwa) Ung. Kanawa
4 Yohana Danbawa Ung. Kanawa
5 Magaji Danbawa Ung. Kanawa
6 Iliya Kasim Ung. Kanawa
7 Alhaji Maigwalasa (Village Head) Gangara Maigwalasa
8 Abubakar Suleiman (Sarki) Gangara
9 Abdulkadir Sani Gangara
10 Bala Muhammed Doka
11 Samaila Ibrahim Doka
12 Audu Bako Doka
13 Baba Yalwa Kazuga Doka
14 Ibrahim Yalwa Doka
15 Tsalha Gambo Doka
16 Alh. Rabiu Hussaini Doka
17 Liman Yakubu Doka
18 Abdulkadir Dangude Doka
19 Musa Alhassan Doka
20 Yusufu Umaru Ungwan Danbaba
21 Liman Muhammadu Ungwan Danbaba
22 Shuaibu Adamu Ungwan Danbaba
23 Labaran Auwal (Youth Leader) Mainasara
24 Ibrahim Auwal Mainasara
25 Balarabe Jaafaru Ungwan Liman
26 Babangida Sarkin Loadi Ungwan Liman
27 Alh. Bello Tanimu Ungwan Liman
28 Alh. Garba Tanimu Ungwan Liman
53 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Concerns and queries raised across the areas were the same, indicating the homogenous
characteristics of the project area and of the effects of the rehabilitation work.
Figure 8. 3: Consultation with women in Kwarakwara and Children returning from farm
Figure 8. 4: Identified major source of enterprise empowerment for the women folk in Tami
Figure 8. 5: Consultation with the women and youths selling refreshments in Tami after the days work
54 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 8. 6: Consultation with PAPs and Community Head at Birnin Yero
The list of attendance at the public consultations is found in Table 8.2 below.
Table 8.2: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot N2
S/N NAMES LOCATION
1. Shugaba Diyo lawal Angwan Kadi
2. Maitaimakiya Binta Ahmadu Angwan Kadi
3. Ma’aji Hafsatu Usman Angwan Kadi
4. Aishatu Sale Angwan Kadi
5. Bakisu Muhammad Angwan Kadi
6. Hajjana Lawal Angwan Kadi
7. Ladi Musa Angwan Kadi
8. Fatamah Yakubo Angwan Kadi
9. Hajiya Marka Angwan Kadi
10. Rabi Isiya Angwan Kadi
11. Sarki Kasuwa Umaru Muhammadu Angwan Kadi
12. Ibrahim Dandama Angwan Kadi
13. Lawal Sule Angwan Kadi
14. Abdullahi Usman Angwan Kadi
15. Ya’u Idris Angwan Kadi
16. Sale Abdullahi Angwan Kadi
17. Abubakar Yahaya Angwan Kadi
18. Abubakar Yusuf Angwan Kadi
19. Sale Dalwa Angwan Kadi
20. Yuguda Abdulkadir Labar
21. Abdulaziz Abdulkadir Labar
22. Danasabe Abdulkadir Labar
23. Rufai Muazu Dikko Labar
24. Mal. Umaru Yusuf Labar
25. Idris Haruna Labar
26. Alh. Wada Dalhatu Labar
27. Abubakar Tijjani Labar
28. Sanusi ijjani Labar
29. Alh. Sanai Musa Dadin – Kowa
30. Alh. Rabiu Ibrahim Dadin – Kowa
31. Mamman Tanimu (Tsoho) Dadin – Kowa
32. Alh. Lawal Ibrahim Dadin – Kowa
33. Alh. Musa Saidu Masache
34. Yahaya Saidu Masache
55 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
35. Abubakar Ibrahim Masache
36. Aminu Abubakar Kwarakwara
37. Inuwa Mohammed Kwarakwara
38. Abdulkarim Idris Kwarakwara
39. Aliyu Abdullahi Kwarakwara
40. Lawal Saidu Kwarakwara
41. Haruna Saidu Kwarakwara
42. Bashir Ibrahim Kwarakwara
43. Yau Dankurma Tami
44. Marafa Aliyu Tami
45. Khalamu Musa Tami
46. Dantala Abdulhamid Adamu Tami
47. Ibrahim Abdullahi Tami
48. Muaru Ahmadu Tami
49. Sanusi Suleiman Ungwan Madauchi
50. Aminu Suleiman Ungwan Madauchi
51. Mal. Yayo Birnin Yero
52. Alh. Iliyasu Birnin Yero
53. Mal. Muazu Birnin Yero
54. Aliyu Shuaibu Birnin Yero
55. Shuaibu Muhammad Birnin Yero
56. Auwal Abdullahi Birnin Yero
57. Hudu Umar Birnin Yero
58. Alh. Musa Birnin Yero
59. Urwatu Musa Birnin Yero
60. Maniru Gambo Birnin Yero
Figure 8. 7: Consultation with Community Heads at Tami and Kwarakwara respectively
They following concerns were raised:
• That the government should inform PAPs on time when the
road project operation will take place to enable them remove
their farm produce and market wares as applicable;
• That the project authority should ensure that compensation
benefits reach the actual PAPs.
Recommended Action: It is recommended as follows:
• That a workable time be given to PAPs for early
evacuation of assets/belongings,
56 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
• That a notification board indicating the period of
work on each phase of the road is provided by the
contractor,
• That the resettlement committee should ensure
transparency in dispensing compensation benefits,
and
• That contractor should show professional standards
and social responsibility during road rehabilitation by
providing temporary access way so that communities
and commuters are not hindered from going about
their normal businesses.
• That contractor should put in place appropriate
safeguard measures and signal words to prevent
public intrusion into construction work areas.
• That site specific Environmental Management Plan is
prepared by the contractors to mitigate
environmental impacts.
It is noteworthy that all the recommended actions were based on decisions
reached between the project team, PAPs and the representatives of the
communities. Some of the concerns which were outside of the competencies of the
project were well explained at the public consultation.
Significantly the proposed project is envisaged by respondents to have positive
potential to significantly improve the quality of transportation services and
efficiency in the area with attendant socio- environmental benefits such as:
• Reduced travel times
• Reduction in man-hour loss due to poor motorable road ;
• Improvement in micro and macro economy;
• Improved public mass transportation along the corridor; and
• Job creation and reduction in unemployment which in turn will reduce social strife in the States.
8.4.3 LOT S1
A familiarization visitation was made to the various institutions and concerned
stakeholders and the community leaders.
The second –level of the public consultation held at various project areas including
Takanai and Sako. These are the locations where ARAP activities were anticipated.
57 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 8. 8: Consultation with the PAPs at Sako and Takanai
The list of attendance at the public consultations is found in Table 8.3 below.
Table 8.3: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot S1
S/N NAMES LOCATION
1 Irimiya Gora Takanai
2 John Takanai
3 Sheyin Takanai
4 David Takanai
5 Hosea Auta Sako
6 Rekita Aboi Sako
7 Zango Dogo Sako
8 Tinat Akau Sako
9 Donatus H. Usman Sako
10 Timothy Yohanna Sako
11 Dominic Kafai Sako
8.4.4 LOT S2
A familiarization visitation was made to the various institutions and concerned
stakeholders and the community leaders.
The second –level of the public consultation held at various project areas including Kudiri
Kagarko, Kushe 1, Kushe II and Gora Kachia; the locations where resettlement is
anticipated.
The list of attendance at the public consultations is found in Table 8.4 below.
58 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 8. 9: Lot S 2 Kushe 1 & 11 Community women, youths and men commuting to the market.
Table 8.4: List of Participants at the Public Consultation in Lot S2
Figure 8. 10: Consultation with the PAPs at kushe I and Community Head at Kushe II
S/N NAMES LOCATION
1 Audu Abubakar (Village Head) Kudiri Kagarko
2 Sani Maimadara Kushe 1
3 Alh. Adamu Idrisu Kushe 1
4 Alh. Aminu Suleiman Kushe 1
5 Liman Suleiman Abubakar Kushe 1
6 Shaffiu Audu Kushe 1
7 Yakubu Goma Kushe 1
8 Musa Kogi Kushe 1
9 Dauda Kundi Kushe 1
10 Sani Kundi Kushe 1
11 Bashir Umar Kushe 1
12 Salihu Ibrahim Kushe 1
13 Isa Maikifi Kushe 1
14 Saleh Saleh Kushe 1
15 Abba Brother Kushe II
16 Sani Maichibi Kushe II
17 Ladan Waziri Kushe II
18 Dankarami (Sarki) Kushe II
19 Suleiman Kaura Kushe II
20 Maikanti Kaura Kushe II
21 Hajiya Hadiza Gora Kachia
59 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Figure 8. 11: Consultation with Kushe 11 women in Lot S2
CHAPTER NINE
9.0 CONCLUSION
Upon social considerations, forty (40) rural feeder roads were selected for rehabilitation
under the Rural Access and Mobility Project (RAMP) road project. These roads, with a
total length of 427 km, are located in the rural areas of the Northern and Southern Parts
of Kaduna depicted as Lots N1, N2, S1 and S2.
In line with the World Bank Safeguard Policy O.P 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement, this
Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan is drawn up to address the impacts of this project
on persons and assets within the identified locations.
60 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
One hundred and ninety five (195) persons were identified as Project Affected persons
during the survey. The various heads and representatives of each community were
consulted and focus group discussions held with affected persons.
The foremost affected assets are extension of farmlands within the Right of Way and
economic trees. The other loss, though minimal, is loss of income to market men and
women due to limited access to market during the construction phase of project. It is
established that there will be no physical displacement of households or structures.
The PAPs are predominantly males and this is linked to the fact that the major affected
assets are farmlands and the tradition in the communities is that farmlands are owned by
the head of families who in this case were all identified as fathers or sons.
Amongst the PAPs are also ten (11) females, of which ten (10) are market women and fall
within the Loss of Income group and one (1) female will be compensated for loss of
economic tree.
After the valuation of lost income and assets, the total indicative budget for the ARAP
implementation amounts to Twenty One million, Eight Hundred and Ninety-two Thousand,
Thirty-Six Naira, Seventy-Six Kobo Only (N 21, 892,036.76).
Timely implementation of the ARAP will restore the values of lost assets to the PAPs and
kick start the rehabilitation works. It will also create synergy between the communities
and agricultural sectors of the state in improving the Livelihood of the PAPs and
community.
The rural road rehabilitation exercise exerts a positive impact on the communities
including women and children who need good access roads to markets, other communities,
schools and service health centers.
The proposed project is envisaged by respondents to have positive potential to
significantly improve the quality of transportation services and efficiency in the area with
attendant socio- environmental benefits such as reduced travel times, reduction in man-
hour loss due to poor motorable road; Improvement in micro and macro economy;
Improved public mass transportation along the corridor; and Job creation and reduction in
unemployment which in turn will reduce social strife in the States.
REFERENCES
Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for the Rural Access and Mobility
Project (RAMP), Phase 1. World Bank 2006
Land Use Act (1978), Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) (2008): for Rural Access and Mobility Project Phase
1 Kaduna State
World Bank (2000), Resettlement and Rehabilitation Guidebook, Washington DC
Canter, L. W. (1996): Environmental Impact Assessment. Second Edition, New York, USA:
McGraw Hill.
61 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Carney, D. (1998). Implementing the Sustainable Rural Livelihoods Approach, London, UK:
Overseas Development Institute.
E&P Forum/UNEP (1996): Environmental Management in oil and gas exploration and
production. An overview of issues and management approaches, Oxford, UK.
EnvironQuest (2008) Emergency Infrastructure Project Supplemental Component (EIP-SC)
Urban Works Rehabilitation and Resettlement Action Plan
Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette (2007) Legal Notice on Publication of the
details of the breakdown of the National and State Provisional Totals, National Population
Commission 2006 Census, No. 24, Vol. 94, Lagos-15th May, 2007.
FME (Federal Ministry of Environment) (1991): National Guidelines and Standards for
Industrial Effluents, Gaseous Emissions and Hazardous Wastes Management in Nigeria.
Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) (2008) for Rural Access and
Mobility Project Phase 1 Kaduna State
SIEP (2000): Social Impact Assessment Guidelines, HSE Manual, Volume 3. Hazards and
Effects Management Tools and Techniques, Shell International Exploration and Production
B.V. The Hague.
The World Bank Participation Handbook, The World Bank, Washington DC.
World Bank Operational Manual 2001, Annex A OP 401 and 412.
MBANI Development (2011) – Baseline Study for Social and Poverty Impact of OPRC Roads
in Kaduna State.
ANNEXES
Annex 1: Register of Project Affected People (PAPs)
LOT N1
Code No Name of PAP Location Farm Land (FL) Economic Tree (ET) Total
Dimension (D) Value of Farm Land (D* 40)
No Affected
Annual Yield per Tree
Replanting & Nursery per Tree ET Amount
Compensation Per PAP
Pictures
R1201 Umaru Salis 3,000 120,000 4 10,000 3,000 52,000 172,000
R1202 Ayuba Saidu Madaka 2,658 106,320 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 132,320
Sub-Total Madaka 226,320 6 78,000
R1203 Iliya Kasim 1,000 40,000 4 10,000 3,000 52,000 92,000
R1204 Ishaya Danbawa 1,000 40,000 1 10,000 3,000 13000 53,000
R1205 Yohana Danbawa 1,485 59,400 3 10,000 3,000 39,000 98,400
R1206 Magaji Danbawa
Ungwa Kanawa
1,000 40,000 1 10,000 3,000 13000 53,000
Sub-Total Ungwa Kanawa 4,485 179,400 9 117,000
R12607 Abubakar Suleiman 3121 124,840 4 10,000 3,000 52,000 176,840
R12608 Abdulkadir Sani
Gangara
3,020 120,800 8 10,000 3,000 104,000 224,800
63 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R12609 Alh. Abubakar Suleiman 3,867.19 154,687.60
5 10,000.00 15,000.00
65,000.00 219,687.60
R12610 Alh. Shuaibu A'ba 1,518.75 60,750.00
3 10,000.00 9,000.00
39,000.00 99,750.00
R12611 Alh. Isa Mai Aljana 1,307.81 52,312.40
3 10,000.00 9,000.00
39,000.00 91,312.40
R12612 Ahmed Suleiman 843.75 33,750.00
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 46,750.00
R12613 Ado Dan Koli 703.13 28,125.20
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 41,125.20
R12614 Dan Iya Kurma 1,898.44 75,937.60
3 10,000.00 9,000.00
39,000.00 114,937.60
R12615 Alh. Yahuza Idigi 646.88 25,875.20
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 38,875.20
R12616 Bature Dangote 956.25 38,250.00
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 51,250.00
R12617 Aliyu Idris 253.13 10,125.20
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 23,125.20
R12618 Tukur Uban Samari
1,476.56 59,062.40
2 10,000.00 6,000.00
26,000.00 85,062.40
64 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R12619 Saadu Ali Fari 1,926.56 77,062.40
3 10,000.00 9,000.00
39,000.00 116,062.40
R12620 Bature Dangote 2,109.38 84,375.20
4 10,000.00 12,000.00
52,000.00 136,375.20
R12621 Animal Track 660.94 26,437.60 1 10,000.00
3,000.00
13,000.00
39,437.60
R12622 Alh. Auta Agidan 829.69 33,187.60
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 46,187.60
R12623 Sani Ahmadu Mai Makani 604.69 24,187.60
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 37,187.60
R12624 Dayabu Maikifi 984.38 39,375.20
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 52,375.20
R12625 Usman Safiyanu 1,659.38 66,375.20
3 10,000.00 9,000.00
39,000.00 105,375.20
R12626 Idris Mai dara Hamza
Gangara
984.38 39,375.20
1 10,000.00 3,000.00
13,000.00 52,375.20
Sub-Total Gangara 1,174,891.60 624,000
R12727 Balarabe Jafaaru 450 18,000 3 10,000 3,000 39,000 57,000
R12728 Babangida S. Loadi
Ungwa Liman
320 12,800 1 10,000 3,000 13000 25,800
65 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R12729 Bello Tanimu 350 14,000 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 40,000
R12730 Garba Tanimu 250 10,000 2 10,000 3,000 23000 33,000
R12731 Yaro Tanimu 400 16,000 3 10,000 3,000 39000 55,000
R12732 Habibu Aliyu 300 12,000 3 10,000 3,000 39,000 51,000
R12733 Aiybo Garba 331 13,240 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 39,240
R12734 Tanimu Waziri
350
14,000 3 10,000 3,000 39,000 53,000
R12735 Lawal Aliyu 300 12,000 1 10,000 3,000 13000 25,000
R12736 Dogara Bello 400 16,000 2 10,000 3,000 26000 42,000
R12737 Bashari Aliyu
350 14,000 2 10,000 3,000 26000 40,000
66 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R12738 Idi Tanimu 370 14,800 3 10,000 3,000 39,000 14,800
R12739 Garba Tanimu 300 12,000 4 10,000 3,000 52,000 64,000
R12740 Audu Aliyu 350 14,000 1 10,000 3,000 13000 27,000
R12741 Jibrin Ibrahim
359 14,360 3 10,000 3,000 39000 53,360
R12742 Saleh Aliyu 300 12,000 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 36,000
R12743 Haruna Aliyu 400 16,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 29,000
R12744 Suleiman Suleiman 300 12,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 25,000
R12745 Dauda Adamu 420 16,800 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 42,800
R12746 Lukeman Suleiman
300 12,000 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 28,000
Sub-Total Ungwa Liman 276,000 43 413,000
67 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R12747 Bala Mohammed 600 24,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 27,000
R12748 Samaila Ibrahim 700 28,000 NA NA NA 0 28,000
R12749 Audu Bako 600 24,000 NA NA NA 0 24,000
R12750 Baba Yalwa Kazuga 500 20,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 33,000
R12751 Ibrahim Yalwa 900 36,000 NA NA NA 0 36,000
R12752 Tsalha Gambo 650 26,000 NA NA NA 0 26,000
R12753 Rabiu Hussaini 943 37,720 NA NA NA 0 37,720
R12754 Liman Yakubu 400 16,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 29,000
R12755 Abdulkadir Dangude
Doka
550 22,000 NA NA NA 0 22,000
68 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R12756 Musa Alhassan
850 34,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 43,000
Sub-Total 267,720 4 52,000
R12757 Adamu Yau 600 24,000 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 50,000
R12758 Yusufu Umaru
Ungwan Danbaba
400 16,000 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 36,000
R12759 Liman Muhammadu 550 22,000 3 10,000 3,000 39,000 61,000
R12760 Shuaibu Adamu 450 18,000 3 10,000 3,000 39,000 57,000
R12761 Kasimu Nuhu 600 24,000 4 10,000 3,000 52,000 76,000
R12762 Tukur Abdullahi 940 37,600 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 63,600
R12763 Ayuba Musa
600 24,000 2 10,000 3,000 26,000 50,000
Sub Total 165,600 18 234,000
Total 2,410,680
69 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
LOT N2
Code No Name of PAP Location Farm Land (FL) Economic Tree (ET)/ Income Loss Total
Dimension (D) Value of Farm Land (D* 40)
No Affected
Annual Yield per Tree
Replanting & Nursery per Tree
ET / Income loss Amount
Compensation Per PAP
Pictures
R2.5L-01 Shugaba Diyo lawal 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L02 Maitaimakiya Binta Ahmadu 0 0 0 0 0
16,800 16,800
R2.5-L03 Ma’aji Hafsatu Usman 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L04 Aishatu Sale 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L05 Bakisu Muhammad 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L06 Hajjana Lawal 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L07 Ladi Musa 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L08 Fatamah Yakubo 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L09 Hajiya Marka 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L10 Rabi Isiya 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L11 Sarki Kasuwa Umaru Muhammadu 0 0 0 0 0
16,800 16,800
R2.5-L12 Ibrahim Dandama 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L13 Lawal Sule 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L14 Abdullahi Usman 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L15 Ya’u Idris 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L16 Sale Abdullahi 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L17 Abubakar Yahaya 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L18 Abubakar Yusuf 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
R2.5-L19 Sale Dalwa Angwan Kadi 0 0 0 0 0 16,800 16,800
Sub-Total Angwan Kadi 0 0 0 0 0 218,400
R2.5-01 Yuguda Abdulkadir 1,293 51,720 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 64,720
R2.5-02 Abdulaziz Abdulkadir
Labar
1,000 40,000 3 30,000 9,000 39,000 79,000
70 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.5-03
Danasabe Abdulkadir 1,000 40,000 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R2.5-04
Rufai Muazu Dikko 1,250 50,000 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R2.5-05
Mal. Umaru Yusuf 1,000 40,000 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R2.5-06
Idris Haruna 1,350 54,000 - N/A N/A N/A 54,000
R2.5-07
Alh. Wada Dalhatu 1,000 40,000 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R2.5-08
Abubakar Tijjani 750 30,000 4 40,000 12,000 52,000 82,000
R2.5-09
Sanusi Tijjani
1,500 60,000 - N/A N/A N/A 60,000
Sub-Total Labar 10143 405,720 16 208,000
R2.5-DK01 Alh. Sanai Musa 449 17,960 - N/A N/A N/A 17,960
R2.5-DK02
Alh. Rabiu Ibrahim
350 14,000 3 30,000 9,000 39,000 53,000
R2.5-DK03
Mamman Tanimu
(Tsoho)
Dadin Kowa
450 18,000 - N/A N/A N/A 18,000
71 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.5-DK04
Alh. Lawal Ibrahim
200 8,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 21,000
Sub-Total Dadin Kowa 1,449 57,960 4 52,000
R2.5-M01
Alh. Musa Saidu 600 24,000 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 37,000
R2.5-M02
Yahaya Saidu Masache 400 16,000 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 48,000
R2.5-M03
Abubakar Ibrahim
587 23,480 3 30,000 9,000 39,000 62,480
Sub-Total Masache 1587 63,480 6 78,000
R2.10-01 Aminu Abubakar 450
18,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 31,000
R2.10-02
Inuwa Mohammed 350
14,000.00 - NA NA NA 14,000
R2.10-03 Abdulkarim Idris 380
15,200.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 41,200
R2.10-04
Aliyu Abdullahi 400
16,000.00
NA
NA
NA 16,000
R2.10-05
Lawal Saidu
390
15,600.00
1 10,000 3,000 13,000 28,600
R2.10-06
Haruna Saidu
Kwarakwara
300
12,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 25,000
72 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.10-07
Bashir Ibrahim
330
13,200.00
-
NA NA NA
13,200
R2.10-08
Hadi Shittu
420
16,800.00
-
NA NA NA
16,800
R2.10-09
Shuaibu Musa
350
14,000.00
1 10,000 3,000 13,000 27,000
R2.10-10
Nasiru Adamu
350
14,000.00
1 10,000 3,000 13,000 27,000
R2.10-11
Usman Adamu 346
13,840.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 39,840
R2.10-12
Yahaya Yusuf 410
16,400.00
-
NA NA NA
16,400
R2.10-13
Yunusa Samila 400
16,000.00
-
NA NA NA
16,000
R2.10-14
Aribi Musa 300
12,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 25,000
R2.10-15
Khalifa Garba 300
12,800.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 25,800
R2.10-16
Samaila Yunusa
300
12,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 25,000
Sub-Total Kwarakwara 5796 231,840.00 12 156,000
R2.10-T01 Yau Dankurma
300
12,000.00 NA
NA NA NA
12,000
73 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.10-T02 Marafa Aliyu 220
8,800.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 34,800
R2.10-T03 Khalamu Musa 310
12,400.00 NA NA NA NA 12,400
R2.10-T04
Dantala Abdulhamid Adamu 450
18,000.00 NA
NA
NA
NA 18,000
R2.10-T05
Ibrahim Abdullahi 293
11,720.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 24,720
R2.10-T06
Muaru Ahmadu 220
8,800.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 34,800
R2.10-T07
Umaru Wada 250
10,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 23,000
R2.10-T08
Abdullahi Aliyu 260
10,400.00 NA
NA
NA
NA 10,400
R2.10-T09
Kabiru Saidu 245
9,800.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 22,800
R2.10-T10
Dahiru Saidu 300
12,000.00
NA
NA
NA
NA 12,000
R2.10-T11
Alh. Saleh
Tami
270
10,800.00
NA
NA
NA
NA 10,800
74 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.10-T12
Iliya Usman 370
14,800.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 40,800
R2.10-T13
Waziri Dari Saidu 250
10,000.00
NA
NA
NA
NA 10,000
R2.10-T14
Iliya Usman 250
10,000.00
NA
NA
NA
NA 10,000
R2.10-T15
Awalu Musa 245
9,800.00
NA
NA
NA
NA 9,800
R2.10-T16
Jaafaru Barau 240
9,600.00
NA
NA
NA
NA 9,600
R2.10-T17
Danlami Mukailu
150
6,000.00
1 10,000 3,000 13,000 19,000
Sub-Total Tami 4623 184,920.00 10 130,000
R2.25-01 Sanusi Suleiman 1,000
40,000 4 40,000 12,000 52,000 92,000
R2.25-02
Aminu Suleiman
Ung. Madauchi
1346
53,840 3 30,000 9,000 39,000 92,840
Sub-Total Ung. Madauchi 2346 93,840 7 91,000
R2.25-BY01
Mal. Yayo
Birnin Yero
500
20,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 33,000
75 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.25-BY02
Alh. Iliyasu 450
18,000.00
NA NA NA NA 18,000
R2.25-BY03
Mal. Muazu 500
20,000.00
NA NA NA NA 20,000
R2.25-BY04
Aliyu Shuaibu 400
16,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 42,000
R2.25-BY05
Shuaibu Muhammad 480
19,200.00
NA NA NA NA 19,200
R2.25-BY06
Alh. Rayyanu 500
20,000.00
NA NA NA NA 20,000
R2.25-BY07
Mal. Yusuf 450
18,000.00
NA NA NA NA 18,000
R2.25-BY08
Alh. Lawal Garkuwa 500
20,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 33,000
R2.25-BY09
Mal. Iliyasu 306
12,240.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 25,240
R2.25-BY10
Alh. Shehu Dan-auta 400
16,000.00 NA NA NA NA 16,000
R2.25-BY11
Murtala Ahamadu
350
14,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 40,000
76 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.25-BY12
Buhari Dunkule 450
18,000.00 NA NA NA NA 18,000
R2.25-BY13
Haruna Abubakar 350
14,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 27,000
R2.25-BY14
Alh. Musa 456
18,240.00
NA NA NA NA 18,240
R2.25-BY15
Auwal Abdullahi
450
18,000.00
NA NA NA NA 18,000
R2.25-BY16
Hudu Umar
450
18,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 44,000
R2.25-BY17
Alh. Musa 500
20,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 33,000
R2.25-BY18 Urwatu Musa 400 16,000.00 NA NA NA NA 16,000
R2.25-BY19
Maniru Gambo 450
18,000.00
NA NA NA NA 18,000
R2.25-BY20
Murtala Shehu 600
24,000.00
NA NA NA NA 24,000
R2.25-BY21
Danjuma Shehu 450
18,000.00
NA NA NA 0 18,000
R2.25-BY22
Kabiru Shehu
400
16,000.00
NA NA NA NA 16,000
77 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R2.25-BY23
Shauibu Umar 500
20,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 46,000
R2.25-BY24
Zakariyya Saidu 500
20,000.00
NA NA NA NA 20,000
R2.25-BY25
Mustafah Shaaibu
400
16,000.00 NA
NA NA NA 16,000
R2.25-BY26 Mal. Yusi 426 17,040.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 30,040
R2.25-BY27
Maarazu Rabiu Mohammadu
500
20,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 46,000
R2.25-BY28
Yusuf Mohammadu 500
20,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 46,000
R2.25-BY29
Mohammadu Inusa 500
20,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 46,000
R2.25-BY30
Muazu Yakubu
500
20,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 46,000
Sub-Total Birnin Yero 13,868 554,720.00 22 286,000
LOT S1
Code No Name of PAP Location Farm Land (FL) Economic Tree (ET) Total
Dimension (D) Value of Farm Land (D* 40) # Affected
Annual Yield per Tree
Replanting & Nursery per Tree ET Amount
Compensation Per PAP
Pictures
R3.9a-01 Irimiya Gora Takanai 1,408 56,320.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 82,320
78 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R3.9a-02
John Aboi 750
30,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 43,000
R3.9a-03
Sheyin Vincent 1,500
60,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 86,000
R3.9a-04
David Bonkyock
2,000
80,000.00 3 30,000 9,000 39,000 119,000
Sub-Total Takanai 5,658 226,320.00 8 104,000
R3.9b-01 Hosea Auta 1,200 48,000.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A 48,000
R3.9b-02 Rekita Aboi 1,750 70,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 83,000
R3.9b-03 Zango Dogo 2,117 84,680.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 97,680
R3.9b-04 Tinat Akau 2,500 100,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 126,000
R3.9b-05 Donatus H. Usman 2,000 80,000.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A 80,000
R3.9b-06 Timothy Yohanna 2,500 100,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 126,000
R3.9b-07 Dominic Kafai
Sako
1,250 50,000.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A 50,000
Sub-Total Sako 13,317 532,680.00 6 78,000
LOT S2
Code No Name of PAP Location Farm Land (FL) Economic Tree (ET)
Dimension
(D) Value of Farm Land (D* 40)
No Affected
Annual Yield per Tree
Replanting & Nursery ET Amount Total
Pictures
R4.1-01
Audu Abubakar
(Village Head)
Kudiri Kagarko 12,006
480,240 48 480,000 144,000 624,000 1,104,240
Sub-Total Kudiri Kagarko 12,006 480,240 48 624,000
R4.13-01
Sani Maimadara
Kushe 1 500
20,000.00 1 10,000 3,000 13,000 33,000
79 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
R4.13-02
Alh. Adamu Idrisu 550
22,000.00
1 10,000 3,000 13,000 35,000
R4.13-03
Alh. Aminu Suleiman 450
18,000.00
1 10,000 3,000 13,000 31,000
R4.13-04
Liman Suleiman Abubakar 482
19,280.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 45,280
R4.13-05
Shaffiu Audu 400
16,000.00
NA NA NA NA 16,000
R4.13-06
Yakubu Goma
400
16,000.00
NA NA NA NA
16,000
R4.13-07
Musa Kogi
400
16,000.00
NA NA NA NA
16,000
R4.13-08
Dauda Kundi
350
14,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 40,000
R4.13-09
Sani Kundi
400
16,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 42,000
R4.13-10
Bashir Umar 350
14,000.00 NA NA NA NA 14,000
R4.13-11 Salihu Ibrahim 350 14,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 40,000
R4.13-12 Isa Maikifi 400 16,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 42,000
R4.13-13
Saleh Saleh
350
14,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 40,000
80 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Sub-Total Kushe 1 5,382 215,280.00 15 195,000
R4.13-K2-01
Abba Brother 1,000
40,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R4.13-K2-02
Sani Maichibi 1,000 40,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R4.13-K2-03
Ladan Waziri 1,000 40,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R4.13-K2-04
Dankarami (Sarki) 1,000 40,000.00 2 20,000 6,000 26,000 66,000
R4.13-K2-05
Suleiman Kaura 600
24,000.00 NA NA NA NA 24,000
R4.13-K2-06
Maikanti Kaura
Kushe II
782 31,280.00 4
40,000 12,000 52,000 83,280
Sub-Total Kushe II 5,382 215,280.00 12 156,000
R4.17-01
Hajiya Hadiza
Gora Kachia 2070
82,800.00 6 60,000 18,000 78,000 160,800
Sub-Total Gora Kachia 2,070 82,800.00 6 78,000
Note
• Value of Land is given by dimension x N40 per m2
• Current Market value of land per m2 in the project area is N40.
• Dimension refers to the coverage of Land taken per PAP
81 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Annex 2: Photo Gallery
Consultation with Youth Forum at Makarauta Questionnaire Administration at Makaurata Interview with Village Head( Alhaji Maigwalasa at Tudun Kudi
Maize Harvesting in a Farm at Tudun Kudi Participants at Consultation in Dundubus Consultation with Hunters at Gangara Maingwalasa
Children with food awaiting farmers/ workers return Consultation with an Authority at Kushe II Mrs. Ogungbuyi with Women folk at Kushe II
82 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Samaila Mahmud - Community Leader,Birnin Yero Abdullahi Aliyu-Head of Community Tami Abdukarim Idris (R)-head of Community at Kwarakwara
State of the road at kwarakwara Activities of Children along the Project Routes
Ugwa Gwari Primary School along Lot N2 Activities of Women along the Project Routes
Annex 3: Survey Instrument/Sample Questionnaire
KDSG-RAMP-SPIU
MINISTRY OF WORKS AND TRANSPORT, KADUNA PROPOSED OPRC ROADS CORRIDOR PROJECT –
Questionnaire for the Preparation of Environmental Management Plan and Resettlement Action Plan
Preamble: The Kaduna State Government aims to improve and enhance accessibility and mobility in rural areas through the Rural Access and Mobility Project (RAMP). No doubt, accessibility and mobility are critical issues in the lives of the rural population, consideringnthat majority of them are agriculturalists. Movement of their agricultural inputs and outputs (produce) is hinged on accessibility and mobility. This questionnaire which is expected to take about 20 minutes to complete is aimed at eliciting your view/opinion on the social and environmental implications of the proposed road access and improvement of activities in your area. Your input would assist in the preparation of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and an Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) that would enable the State Government to manage the various project activities under OPRC along this corridor…………………………………………….. in a manner that guarantees socio-environmental sustainability of the project. As we thank you, rest assured that your responses shall be kept confidential. My name is ………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… DATE:…………………………………………………………… Questionnaire No:………………………………………………………. LGA:……………………………………………………………………… Please simply tick (x) or write in brief detail where appropriate SECTION A: BIO-DATA
1. Name: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2. Phone Number: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3. Address (optional): …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4. Age (years): �18 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 65
5. Sex: Male Female
6. What is your religion: Christian Muslim Pagan Others
7. Marital Status: Single Married Separated/Divorcee
8. No. of children:Non 1-2 3-4 5-6 Above 6
9. Level of education: ( ) No formal educ. ( ) Primary ( ) Secondary ( ) Tertiary ( )
Others (specify) …………………………………………………………….
10. What do you do for a living (your primary occupation/nature of business)? ( ) Self-employed ( ) Civil Servant ( ) NGOs/CBOs ( ) Student ( ) Others (specify)………………………………………………
84 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
KDSG-RAMP-SPIU
MINISTRY OF WORKS AND TRANSPORT, KADUNA PROPOSED OPRC ROADS CORRIDOR PROJECT –
Questionnaire for the Preparation of Environmental Management Plan and Resettlement Action Plan
1 Scale/Value of business 1. Small scale (value holdings/products/equipment less than �50,000.00
2. Medium scale (value of holdings/pr/products/equipment �50,000.00 - �100,000.00)
3. Large scale (value of holdings/pr/products/equipment over �100,000.00)
2 Project affected persons (PAP) type
1. Farming 2. Animal/Livestock Rearing 3. Hunting 4. Shops/kiosks 5. Artisans/Craftsmen 6. Residence 7. Others (specify).
3 Type of material used for residence/shop/stall
1. Steel 2. Mud 3. Plywood 4. Wood 5. Corrugated Iron sheet 6. Thatched 7. Other (specify)
4 Is business activity/venue/equipment movable or immovable?
1. Movable 2. Immovable
5 How long have you been in this business and location?
6 Are you assisted by any other person(s) in day-to-day running of this business?
1. Yes 2. No
7 If yes, how many people? (Enumerator: please confirm)
8 Are they salaried? 1. Yes 2. No
9 Employees’ Profile
Employee Length of service
Salary (hr/day/wk/mo)
Comment
10 Average monthly/annual turnover on business. What is the average monthly/annual turnover from your business?
11 What is the average monthly/annual income/profit from your business?
12 How many days a week do you work here?
13 How many hours in a day on the average do you work here?
14 Land tenure and business premises ownership Who owns this land, residence, shop/premise/structure?
1. Self 2. Family 3. Individual landlord 4. Local Government 5. State Government 6. Other (specify)
Section 3: Relocation and Resettlement Issues
15 Would you like to relocate your business to another place
1. Yes 2. No
85 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
16 If yes, where would you like to relocate to?
17 If you had to be relocated, where would you prefer to relocate? (Please list your relocation preferences in order of priority, ranking the most preferred relocation as 1st , the next one 2nd, etc.)
1. 2. 3.
18 If you were to relocate, what would be your fears/concerns.
1. 2. 3.
19 If you were to relocate, how can you be assisted to minimize the effects of relocation on you?
Section 4: Social Networking – Group/ Association Membership
20 Do you belong to any group association/association
1. Yes 2. No
21 If yes, name the group/association
1. 2. 3.
22 What do you benefit from the group/association?
1. 2. 3.
23 If respondent does not belong to any group/association, Enumerator ask - Why don’t you belong to any group or association?
1. 2. 3.
24 If you need financial assistance urgently, where would go to get it?
1. 2.
25 What additional comment would you like to make aside what we have discussed so far?
Section 5: Socio-Demographic Information
26 Age of respondent
27 Sex of respondent
28 Ethnic background
29 State of origin if not Kaduna
30 Nationality (if not Nigerian)
31 Highest level of educational attainment
1. No formal educ. 2. Primary 3.Secondary 4. Post-secondary 5. Vocational/others (specify)
32 Name of respondent ………………………………………………………………………………….
33 Respondent’s contact telephone number ……………………………………………………………………
34 Name of owner (if respondent is not the owner) ………………………………………………………….
35 Name of business
Section 6: Identification Information
36 Photograph taken? 1. Yes 2. No
37 If yes, digital no.
38 I.D card provided? 1. Yes 2. No
39 If yes, I.D card no.
40 Size of land occupied (m2/dimension)
86 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads
Section 7: Enumerator’s assessment
41 Do you feel the respondent made an effort to tell the truth?
1. Yes 2. No
42 Were other people present during the interview?
1. Yes 2. No
43 How would you characterize the communication between yourself and the respondent?
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good
44 Language of the interview: 1. English 2. Pidgin English 3. Hausa 4. Other languages (specify)
45 What is your average income in Naira per month?
a. 10,000-15,000 b. 16,000-30,000 c. 30,000-60,000 d. � 60,000
87 | Final Report of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan of Lots N1, N2, S1 & S2 OPRC Roads