financial risk management – top priorities for corporate treasuries
TRANSCRIPT
Financial RiskManagement – Toppriorities for Corporatetreasuries
Aniket Kulkarni
Michiel Mannaerts
March 2014
www.pwc.com
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 2
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Financial risks in corporate treasury
3. Tools for risk management
2June 2013
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 4
What is on the agenda for Treasury – Swisssurvey
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Improving visibility and control of cash
Financial risk management / market volatility
Credit and counterparty risk
Enhancing the treasury organisation
Increasing straight through processing
Implementing or replacing a treasury management
system
Refinancing strategy
Regulation and Taxation
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 5
PwC
PwC Global Treasury Survey
Slide 5
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Weather derivatives
Other, please specify
Outsourcing
Additional regulations following the financial crisis
Webservices
IFRS – US GAAP convergence
Bank industry consolidation
Innovative financial instruments/structured finance solutions
Enterprise wide risk management
Supply chain financing
Commodity risk management
Partnering with the business
Global banking
Shared service centers
SEPA
Credit risk management tools
New technology/systems
SWIFT connectivity
Payment factories
In-house banking
Reviewing/improving risk management policies
Bank relationship management
Working capital management
Cash flow forecasting
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 6
The ‘elephant in the room’: EMIR
6
RequirementsDodd-Frank
(commercial End-Users)
EMIR(NFCs below clearing
threshold)
SDR Reporting/Record Keeping √ √
Central Clearing
Exchange/SEF/MTF Trading
Collateral Exchange for Non-ClearedSwaps
√ *
Confirmation * √
Reconciliation * √
Compression * √**
Dispute Resolution * √
End User Exemption(only available to non-financial
companies on trade by trade basis)
* These rules do not directly apply to End-Users/ NFCs-. However, End-Users/ NFCs- might be indirectly impacted as aresult of rules imposed on SDs and MSPs/ FCs** Applicable if NFC has 500 or more derivatives outstanding with a single counterparty
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 7
IFRS 13Fair value measurement
7
Uncertainty aboutthe futurepotentialexposure
Assessment of thecounterparty credit
risk and the owncredit risk
Netting- andcollateral
agreements
Impact on theinternal credit
risk managementImpact onHedge
accounting
Allocation of aportfolio CVA on
the single FI
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 8
IFRS 9 can be applied, but not yetmandatory
Widespread calls for less complex and more principles-based standard has led to IFRS 9
Some of the key issues resolved:
Treasury Centre Netting
Derivatives hedging combinations of derivatives and non-derivatives
Effectiveness testing
Commodity hedging
Hedging with options
Using these new opportunities will require technological support
8
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 10
PwC
Financial risks in finance function
10
Financeoperations
Payables andReceivables
Financialrisk
Management
Mid-officeand
compliance
Paymentsand
SettlementsAccounting
Regulatory compliance
Settlement Risk
Liquidity Risk
Market Risk
Credit Risk Counterparty Risk
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 11
PwC
Establishing control standards for Treasury
Settlement
Timelypayment
Validation ofinstructions
Dealexecution
Policycomplian
ce
Dealrecording
Timely &accuraterecording
Dealconfirmation
Timelymatching &follow up ofdifferences
Accounting/reporting
Timely &accurate
actiontaken onmgt info
Reconciliation
Timelymatching &follow up ofdifferences
There is significant operational risk in treasury operations
“exposure due to incorrect, or omissions in, processing or settlement of
transactions, whether by human error, fraud or systems failure”
Exposureidentification
Timely &accurate
riskidentification
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 12
Increasing visibility and control over cash…
Slide 12
Majority ofCorporates
Sophistication
MaximiseGroup’s return
Ensure liquidity
Control lostopportunitycosts
ManageLiquidity
Control
ManageCash & BankInfrastructure
ManageCommercialPayments
Optimizeduse of cash
ManageWorkingCapital
Integrated Finance SSC & Treasury In-
House Bank
Objectives
Centralized MNC
Typical Large Corporate
Payment Factory, LinkWCM to performance
ManageBankRelationships
Decentralized MNC
CashProjectionEffectiveness
The trend towards greater centralization of cash management processes and cash flows continues with rapid pace. Following the crisis, theawareness of the value that treasury adds to the business has risen. Coupled with technological improvements and bank offerings, we nolonger only see very large multinationals moving up the value chain. More and more mid market corporates are looking into ways how theycan reengineer their banking structure and implement efficient liquidity management structures and centralize the execution of the Group’sfinancial and operational payments.
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 13
PwC
Centralized payments
Slide 13
IHB current accounts
Payments
Payments
Cash Settlements Centre
In-HouseBank
Corporate Treasury
Reporting
Operating Parameters
SWIFTNetinterface
Bank B
Bank A
Treasury A/C
Country A
Treasury A/C
Country B
Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C
Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C
Reduce number of bankaccounts even further
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 14
8
Market risk from operations – financial riskexposures
Currently area of focusfor the largest clients
Though perhaps moreneeded by smaller co’swith limited resources
Improvement benefitsfrom larger co’stechnology investmentswill trickle down toMME’s
FX Risks
Commodity PriceRisks
Interest Rate Risk
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 15
Market risk - responsibility for commodity risk andassociated FX risk is changing
10%
11%
14%
33%
34%
38%
52%
49%
43%
5%
6%
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Before crisis
During crisis
After crisis
Growing move towards treasury or a specific commodity risk mgtdepartment to have responsibility since 2008
Specific CRM department Treasury department Purchasing department Sales department
Page 15
Source - PwC Treasury Survey 2010
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 16
Regulatory compliance
11
Multiple Regulatorycompliance requirements
Requires multipleoverlapping:
•Reporting,•Workflows•Calculations•Interfaces
Intelligent regulatory compliance:
Efficient - Comply with multiple regulations efficientlyBeyond Compliance - Capture the risk and operational benefits via smarter processes & technology
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 18
PwC
Straight through processing
18
ERP Accounting
ERP / Frontoffice systems
Exposuredata
Exposurecapture and
managementFront Office
Back officeand
Accounting
Mid-office /Risk
Management
Market data
Confirmations
Payments
Requests
Deals
Exposures
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 19
Evolution of Bank Connectivity & Standardisation
Payments Integration
Interoperability, Integration and Automation
?
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 20
PwC
Risk Monitoring - Dashboards and reporting
20
Cash Management Trade Management
Complainace Risk
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 22
PwC
In addition, the latest PwC Global Treasury Survey*shows that Technology is one of the key priorities ofour clients globally....
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Global banking
Accounting
Cash flow forecasting
Reviewing/improving risk managementpolicies
FX
Enterprise wide risk management
Liquidity
New technology/systems
Cash management
Funding
What is on the top of your treasury agenda right now?
* PwC Global Treasury Survey 2010/11 - 583 IndividualResponses - 34 Countries - All Continents
Slide 22
© 2010 SAP AG. All rights reserved. / Page 23
“Treasury has to become an enterprise wide processrather than a corporate department”
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and doesnot constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in thispublication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty(express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information containedin this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers AG, itsmembers, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty ofcare for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on theinformation contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
© 2013 PwC. All rights reserved. In this document, “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopersAG which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each memberfirm of which is a separate legal entity.
PricewaterhouseCoopers AGAvenue Giuseppe-Motta 50Email: [email protected]: +41795804362
Aniket Kulkarni
Treasury and Commodity trading
Consulting
PricewaterhouseCoopers AGAvenue Giuseppe-Motta 50Email: [email protected]: +41796385164
Michiel Mannaerts
Treasury and Commodity trading
Consulting