first post implementation review of the gillette (wy ... · current 30 zip code(s): 826 exfc...

lABOR RELATIONS

d UNITED STIJ.TES POSTIJ.L SERVICE

January 16, 2013

Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers

Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Cliff:

JA ;\' 1 7 2013

Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7011 2000 0002 7192 0198

.,

As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Gillette, Wyoming Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) Area Mail Processing (AMP).

If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7 412.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)

Enclosure

475 L'ENFANT PLAZA SW

W ASHINGTON DC 20260-4101

'v\MW.USPS .COM (CA2013-75)

11. Losing Facility Information

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Facility Name & Type: Gillette CSMPC

Street Address: 311 S Kendrick Ave City: Gillette

State: WY 50 Facility ZIP Code: 82716

District: Colorado/Wyoming Area: Western

Finance Number: 573800 Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 827

Miles to Gaining Facility: 140.6 EXFC office: Yes Postmaster: Ann M Schutt

Senior Plant Manager: Roland Fuentes District Manager: Selwyn Epperson

12. Gaining Fac1'lity Information

Facility Name & Type: Casper P&DF Street Address: 411 N Forest DR

City: Casper State: WY

50 Facility ZIP Code: 82609 District: Colorado/Wyoming

Area: Western Finance Number: 571558

Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 826 EXFC office: Yes Postmaster:

Senior Plant Manager: Roland Fuentes District Manager: Selwyn Epperson

3. Background Information Approval Date: July 15, 2011

Implementation Date: Oct-01-2011 PIR Type: 1st PIR

Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 : Processing Days per Year: 310

Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,742 EAS Hours per Year: 1,819

Mar-31-2012

Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing! May?, 2010

New Facility Start-up Costs Update 1-----------------1 Date & Time this workbook was last saved:

4. Other Information Area Vice President: Sylvester Black

Vice President, Network Operations: David E. Williams Area AMP Coordinator: Steven P. Murray

NAI Contact: Stephen E. Martin/Barbara Brewington

12-19-2012 02:40

PIR Data Entry Page

• (l

Approval Signatures

Losing FacUlty Name and Type: Facility ZIP Code: Finance Number:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type or DlstrlbutJon Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Facility ZIP Code: Finance Number:

current SCF ZIP Codo(s):

GiUette CSMPC 82716 573800

7 Orig & D&st

Casper P&DF 82609 571558 82.6

Implementation Date: -.:.1.;::.:0/..::.0...:..11-.:.1...:..1 ____ _ PIR Type: ..:.1=.:st~P.:.:.IR..:..-;...--

Date Range of Data: Oct..Q1 •201 1 to Mar-31-2012 ,

ACKNOWlEDGEMENT OF ACCOUNTABILITY ·.I acknowledge illat I am acC:ountab!e ror respecting and supp()rtmg the intvgri!Y Qf aU orriClat kslal reponing systems, including financial repo!U. 8!1d those reiatlt'lg to compliance w ith contracting, complement. or S1mllar e!loru lnvQivrng the Investment llfld e>q>enditure ot funds. uwell as an syslams lo sel'lllce ro our customers - ·

LOSING fACILITY:

Postmaster:

Ann M Schutt Printed Name

Senior f:Jtant Manager:

Roland Fuentes Printed Name

District Manager:

Selwyn Epperson Pt'inled Name

Prinled Nam

Senior Plant Manager:

Roland Fuentes Printed Name

District Manager:

Selwyn Epperson Printed Name

~BUOFF/CEi

Area Vice Presldent:

Sylvester Black Prinled Name

HfAQQUA BfER.S;

Vice President, Network Operations:

David E. W illiams Printed Name ~-::

.- TOate

q ~!Jit"l'1/~(o'c--

Comment•:---------------- -------r-----

PIR Apprqval Signatures 2

Executive Summary Last Saved: December 19, 2012 Date Range of Data:

Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:


Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:


Sayings/Costs

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

Staffing Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

Service

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 0/N)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level

3

Gillette CSMPC 311 S Kendrick Ave Gillette WY 827

Orig & Dest

Casper P&DF 411 N Forest DR Casper WY 826

1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved

($309,041) ($608,674)

($689,820) ($689,820)

($147,811) ($147,811)

($212,290) ($1 12,073)

($250,966) ($135,282)

$0 $0

($1 ,609,928) ($1 ,693,661)

($353,813) ($55, 105)

($1 ,963,742) ($1 ,748,766)

2

Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr

91 .26% 96.67%

87.61% 89.72%

84.65% 86.64%

83.84%

79.26%

PIR Type: 1st PIR Oct-01-2011 - Mar-31-2012

from Workhour Costs - Combined

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS

from Maintenance

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Staffing-Craft

from Staffing-PCESIEAS

from Service Performance & CSM



from Service Performance & C SM


PIR Executive Summary

Calculation Bef1mmc~:u2 Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR

Function 1 Workhour Costs $4,334,794 $4,035,162 $4,643,835 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs

$8,817,784 $8,817,784 $9,507,604 (less Maintenance & Transportation)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $1,081,693 $1,081,693 $1,229,504 Transportation Costs $291,227 $391,443 $503,516

Maintenance Costs $1,428,674 $1,544,357 $1,679,640 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Cost $15,954,172 $15,870,439 $17,564,100

Total One-Time Costs $0 $298,708 $353,813

Total First Year Costs $15,954,172 $16,169,147 $17,917,913

Staffing

Craft Position Total On-Rolls 171 173 180 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 9 10 7

1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP {A(!(!roved) AMP Approved AMP

Function 1 Workhour Savings ($309,041 ) ($608,674) $299,632 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings ($689,820) ($689,820) $0 (Jess MalnVTrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings ($1 47,811) ($1 47,811 ) $0 Transportation Savings ($212,290) ($112,073) ($100,216)

Maintenance Savings ($250,966) ($135,282) ($115,684) Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Savings ($1,609,928) ($1,693,661) $83,733

Total One-Time Costs ($353,813) ($55,105) ($298,708)

Total First Year Savings ($1,963,742) ($1 ,748,766) ($21 4,975)

Staffing Craft Position Loss (9) (7) (2)

PCES/EAS Position Loss 2 3 (1)

PIR Executive Summary 4

Summary Narrative Last Saved: December 19, 2012

Losing Facility Name and Type: Gillette CSMPC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 827

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Casper P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s) : 826

5

Background

The Colorado/Wyoming Performance Cluster, with the assistance from the Western Area Office, has completed an Area Mail Processing (AMP) 6-month Post Implementation Review to measure the success of the consolidation of mail processing operations from Gillette WY Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) to the Casper WY CSMPC. The AMP was approved on July 15, 2011 .

The approved AMP transferred the processing of all originating and destinating volumes for the 827 ZIP Code service areas to the Casper CSMPC from the Gillette CSMPC. The transfer of the volumes was completed on Oct 1, 2011 .

The Gillette CSMPC is a USPS-owned facility located approximately 141 miles from the USPS-owned Casper CSMPC.

Financial Summary

Financial savings identified during this first PIR study for this consolidation of originating and destinating operations are:

Total Annual Savings ($1 ,609,928) Total First Year Savings ($1 ,963,742)

Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Function 1 Wor1<hour Costs $4 ,334,794 $4,035,162 $4,643,835

Non-Processing Craft Worl<hour Costs $8 ,817,784 $8,817,784 $9,507,604 (leas Maintenance & TranaportaUon)

PCES/EAS Worl<hour Costs $1,081 ,693 $1,081,693 $1,229,504 Transportation Costs $291 ,227 $391,443 $503,516

Maintenance Costs $1,428,674 $1 ,544,357 $1 ,679,640 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Cost $15,954, 172 $15,870,439 $17,564,100

Total One-Time Costs $0 $298,708 $353,813

Total First Year Costs $15,954,172 $16,169,147 $17,917,913

The 6-month PIR annualized cost (1st PIR vs . Pre-AMP) identifies that this AMP is not meeting the expectations of the approved AMP. The 1st PIR period includes impacts that can be attributed to the following concu rrent events that occurred after completion of the AMP package and whose impacts are not reflected in the Pre-AMP Base periods for the gaining site Casper:

• AMP of Riverton WY 0/D volumes implemented October 1, 2011 , with an annual increase to Casper operat ing costs of $132,792 from the approved AMP;

• AMP of Sheridan WY 0/D volumes implemented October 1, 2011 , with an annual increase to Casper operating costs of $242,751 from the approved AMP;

• AMP of Worland WY 0/D volumes implemented October 1, 2011, with an annual increase to Casper operating costs of $142,812 from the approved AMP;

• Casper Customer Services Operations (F-2, 4 & 8) that were not impacted by the AMPs increased by $556,977 over the base period in the approved AMP;

• Gillette Customer Services Operations (F-2, 4 & 8) that were not impacted by the AMPs increased by $263,199 over the base period in the approved AMP.;

Adjusting for the above impacting both the losing and gaining sites, the projected First Year Cost for the Gillette AM P is $625,21 1, not meeting the approved AMP expected savings of $214,975.

PIR Summary Narrative

6

Customer Service Considerations

There were ten OND service pair upgrades and one downgrade with the implementation of the AMP. National Distribution and Labeling List changes were submitted as appropriate for lists L002, L005, and L201 and published in PB 22321 on October 6, 2011 .

The Gillette CSMPC EXFC First Class Mail Service performance from TTMS for the AMP impacted ZIP Codes are:

·-I Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day ! 3 Day

Percentage Percentage Percentage Q1 2011 92.64% 94.71% 91.42%

Before AMP Q2 2011 84.59% 95.13% 86.98%

Q3 2011 100.00% 95.24% 91 .00% Q4 2011 96.09% 95 .70% 91 .96%

I After AMP

Q1 2012 93.02% 76.27% 82.40%

Q2 2012 91.26% 87.61% 84.65%

Q3 2012

Q4 2012

The Casper EXFC First Class Service performance from TTMS for the AMP impacted ZIP Codes are:

·~ ·~-.¥<· • ·• . .. _. -- - -----

Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day I 3 Day

Percentage Percentage I Percentage Q1 2011 97.18% 88.81% 73.12%

Before AMP Q2 2011 98.22% 93.24% 88.92%

Q3 2011 96.46% 92.33% 89.69% 042011 93.90% 94.17% 90.91%

Q1 2012 94.78% 82.84% 79.77%

After AMP 022012 96.67% 89.72% 86.64%

Q3 2012

Q4 2012

There have been no changes to local mail collection box pick-up times due to AMP. Additionally, there have been no changes to retail or BMEU operations as a result of the AMP implementation and Mailers are able to deposit their mail through the Gillette Main Office BMEU as done before the AMP was implemented. A local Gillette WY postmark is still available from the post office.

Staffing Impacts

The approved Gillette AMP proposal identified a net increase of two craft positions with Gillette reducing five distribution positions and Casper adding six distribution and one maintenance positions from the consolidation of originating and destinating operations. The additional maintenance position was necessary to provide the required support for the redeployed AFCS to Casper. Additionally, the AMP proposed an increase of one EAS position in Casper that was to be the result of filling the vacant but authorized SDO positions at the time of the study.

The 6-month PIR data reflects a net craft complement increase of nine positions with Gillette decreasing by five distribution and one maintenance position and increasing by four in Other (delivery) functions while Casper has increased by ten - adding ten distribution and one in Other Functions and decreasing by one maintenance position. This increase complement over proposed includes six additional distribution positions identified in the other approved AMP initiatives identified in the Financial Summary section . Gillette EAS staffing show a reduction of one due to the vacant but authorized Postmaster position and Casper with a reduction due to the vacant but authorized Postmaster and both SDO positions.


7

The staffing impacts on management-to-craft ratios are summarized in the tables below:

All affected employees that were reassigned to other Postal facilities were subject to processes outlined in the National Labor Agreements. Pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN), the USPS is complying with the National Labor Agreements in reassigning employees.

Transportation Changes

All transportation supporting both Gillette and Casper is exclusively HCR with no PVS service. The approved Gillette AMP projected an annual transportation cost of $100,216 with the 6-month PIR data projecting an annualized cost of $212,290. This increase above what had been projected in the AMP are due to transportation reviews prior to, and post AMP implementation.

Specific changes to HCR transportation identified in the original AMP are: • HCR 82014 was not able to be decreased as projected due to need to protect Express Mail

service; • The New Casper HCR (82681) cost was greater than projected after solicitation.

These additional changes were necessary to ensure operat ing plan performance for timely processing of all originating and destinating volumes .


8

Equipment Relocation and Maintenance Impacts

The projected savings reflect the consolidation of mail processing operations to Casper CSMPC and the redeployment of 1- AFCS and 1-DBCS from excess USPS inventory to support the additional volumes. The second DBCS was relocated to Casper WY to support the approved Worland AMP and the second AFCSNFS unit was relocated to Casper from excess Denver inventory to provide redundancy due to facility location and with the concurrence of the Western Area.

The approved AMP proposal included one-time costs of $298,708 consisting of $83,708 for MPE relocation and $215,000 for the relocation, modification and upgrade of a Loose Mail System along with associated site prep work. Casper expenditures are $353,813 to support these AMP activities.

The AMP proposed a net annual maintenance cost of $115,684 due to the additional staffing, utilities and BDS consumable cost required with the deployment of the AFCSNFS system to Casper. The 6-month PIR projects an annualized cost of $250,966.

Summary:

The full AMP of originating and destinating mail volumes from the Gillette WY CSMPC to the Casper WY P&DF was fully implemented on October 1, 2011.

Adjusting for impacts, the projected First Year Cost for the Gillette AMP is $625,211. The approved AMP had an expected savings of $214,975.


Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: December 19, 2012

PIRType: 1st PIR Implementation Date: 10/01/11

Losing Facility: -::G:-;;i l..;.;;l e;...:..;tt~e -:-=C:...:S;.;.;M;..;.;P_C=-:---------District: Colorado/Wyoming

llliiiWexifc~a·io"'Z\ft~~~'1f;t"','A%, II g I -, ~~~~~%1t>t~~~~ >~ ~~\;w.t.'if&~"'fW@ ~$~®w~•'kf%~.,*'~"'"'Jillt%.!,.~)\ ~ ~ "), s"'' \:"

I Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day 3 Day

Percentage Percentage Percentage ' 012011 92.64% 94.71% 91.42%

Before AMP 022011 84.59% 95.13% 86.98%

032011 100.00% 95.24% 91 .00% 042011 96.09% 95.70% 91 .96%

012012 93.02% 76.27% 82.40%

After AMP 02 2012 91 .26% 87.61% 84.65%

03 2012

04 2012

~ J'' .• it;::;:.,,"- ··"'< * ... '· #t .s; ' . ii1k . '<:u!·h= O't.ii\; '

Gaining Facility: -=C,_a..,..s,_p_er..,..P_&,...,D...,......F___,. _________ _ District: Colorado/Wyoming

-----·-~-~···----·-~--~ -·overii19iir- -----2oa-y---·-- ·--31fay ___ Fiscal Quarter Percentage Percentage Percentage

012011 97.18% 88.81% 73.12%

022011 98.22% 93.24% 88.92%

032011 96.46% 92.33% 89.69% ~eforeAMP S• .,. \ A t 042011 93.90% 94.17% 90.91%

012012 94.78% 82.84% 79.77%

After AMP 02 2012 96.67% 89.72% 86.64%

03 2012

04 2012

(15)Notes: _____________________ _

-----83.84%

87.39%

87.14%

81 .04% ------60.61%

77.12%

9

79.26%

85.12%

83.66%

Customer Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement 2010. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM.

----71 .98%

52.48%

73.72%

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

I combined-Facilities I


Workhour Costs • Combined Facilities Last Saved: Oecerrber 19, 2012

. . .. - . . Function 1 Function 4

11 L-N/AIG$38.49 41 l·NIAIGS31.1il9 12 L·N/AIG$112.19 42 l$33.78/G-N/A

13 43 L.S46.1TIG-N/A

14 l·NIA /G$A2.45 44 l$35.92 I G·NIA 115 • • • .... H.,. ....

" I At-JNUAliZED- -1

~: I ~:~;~;;;:~~ I r1 -.,.-ANfJlNi!fOil!AnUZEil'l'lOr-"1)

PIR Type": ~~~s~i.p:i;~:-iRpmrR~co=lu mn=s-;;~:-;:an;;;n;;;ual;;;;iz;:e;;;d;;;fo<;;F'"in;trl"PpiR .

Date Range of Data: oct~1-2011 to Mar...31-201 2

l ANNUALIZED I I ---AhrlUAUZED I

PIR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

(1 1 PL • • • 10 1 12 13 14 I 16 Annual FHP Volume n Annual TPH or NATPH Volume AnnuaiWortthours Annual ProducUvlty 1:1 Annual Workhour Costs

= Pre AMP ......... 1stPIR

/464 $0 $26 49€ / 554 $0 $19 107 / 637 $0 S20.n~

. 0 0 $0 $( 0 0 ' $0 $(

0 0

' $0 sc

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 1 0 '

$0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 M $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 '

$0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

' 0 ' 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $( 0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 ' $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $( 0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 ; $0 $(

0 0 ' $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 I

$0 $( 0 0 $0 $(

0 0 ' $0 $(

0 0 ' $0 $(

0 0 ' $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 ; $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $1 0 0

I $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $1

0 0 $0 $1 0 · #' 0 $0 $(

0 0 '

$0 $(

0 0 $0 $1

0 0 ~ $0 $1 0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $1 0 0

I $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 '

$0 $(

0 0 $0 $1 0 0 : $0 $1 0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 l $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 : $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0

' $0 $(

0 0 $0 $(

0 0 ' $0 $1 0 0 so $1 0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $1 0 0

' $0 $1

' 0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $1 0 0 $0 $1

PIR Workhour Costs. Combined Facilities

(1) 4 • 10 11 12 13 4 1 16 Annual FHP Votume Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Annual Wortmours Annual Productivity Annual Worthour Costs

Operation Pre AMP Proposed 1stPIR Pre-AMP Proposed 1stPIR Pfe.AMP ........ 1stPIR P,. AIIP Proposed 1stPIR Pre AMP Proposed 1stPIR Numbers

0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0

; 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 ' $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 so $0 0 0 so so 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 so $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 so 0 0 so so 0 0 so so 0 0 I so so

'" "' 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 0 0

' $0 so

0 0 so $0 0 0

l $0 so

0 0 $0 $0 0 0

' so $0

0 0 so so 0 0 so so 0 0 ' $0 so 0 0 so so 0 0 so so 0 0 so so 0 0 so $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0

']< 0 0 so $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0

I $0 so

0 0 $0 $0 0 0 : $0 $0 0 0 i $0 $0 0 0 $0 so 0 0 $0 $0 0 0

I $0 $0

0 0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 0 0 so $0 0 0 $0 so

Arl ' /Arl 0 Nocatc Totals 70jtoSI,JIII 70,909,566 141,364,586

..... _ 214.1133.349 361,091,771 103,316 95,457 111,303 • 2,562 <,775 3,307 $4,3M,7M $l,035,162 $4,643,835 -- --- I --- I --- I --- I

Vartanc:es Annual FHP Volume Vartances Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Variances Annual Worthours Variances Annual ProductM Variances Annual Workhour Costs

Change (11) (11) Change (19) (20) Change (21) (22) Change (23) (24) Change (25) (20)

Ana..,; is 1at PIR n Pr• AMP bt PIA VI Proposed Analysis 111 PIA vt. Pre AMP 111 PIR VI Proposed Analysis 1st PIAn Pre AMP 111 PIA VI Propohd AnatvSis bt PIAn Pre AMP 111 PIA V'l P ropoMd Analysis 1st PIA vs PreAMP 111 PIA vi PropoHG

Units 70,455,020 70,455,020 Units 103,165,422 103,165,422 Units 7,906 15.846 Units 745 532 Units $309,001 $608,674

Percent I 99.4% I 99.4% Percent I 38.9% I 38.9% Pen:: ant I 7.6% I 16.6% Percent I 29.17. I 19.2·~ ...

Percent I 7.1•k I 15.1'1.

(271 NOTI:S: C:::

ti!IV -1f4'200f

12

PIR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

Losing Facillly:_;:G;:,il::.:le:.::ll::::e..::C:.oS:::M::.cP..::C~------------------

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Des!

Workhour Costs- Losing Facility Last Saved: December 19, 2012

PIR Type•: -,i~,;os:';:':'-i~n:'iRP;,I,.R"co"'l"=mn=,:c~=-a=n=n""'a"la=e""d ro"'r"F"';n;"t PIR.

Date Range of Data: 0c1.01_.011 to Mar-31-2012

PIR Wor1<hour Costs· Losing

(1) m 3 4 5 8 !OJ 10 11 12) 13 14 15 18 AnnWII FHP Volume Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Annual Workhours Annual Productivity Annual Workhour Coats

Operation -- Proposed 1stPIR -- Proposed 1stPIR -- Proposed 1stPIR .... .. ,.. Proposed 1stPIR PN·AMP Proposed 1stPIR Numbers 0 No Calc $0 $0 0 No Calc $0 $0 0 No Calc $0 $0

Ad'

Totals 0 0 0 74,263,381 14,609,527 16,164,341 30,119 12.895 20,088 2,410 1,133 805 $1 ,217;7t7 $498,227 $868,984 -- j --- J --- J --- J --- J Variances Annual FHP Volume Variances Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Variances Annual Workhours Variances Annual Productivity Variances AnnWII Wcri:hour Costs

Change (17) (18) Change (19) (20) Change (21) (22) Change (23) (24) Change (25) (26) Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre APIP 1st PIR vs Proposed Analysis 1stPIRvsPreAW 1st PIR vs Proposed Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre ANP 1 It PIR vs Prvposed Analysis 1RPIRvsPreAW 1st PIR vs Proposed Analysis 11t PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed

Units 0 0 Unlls (58,099,040) 1,554,814 Units (10,731) 7,193 Units (1.605) (328) Units {$348,603) $370,757

Percent #OIV/01 #OIV/01 Percent -78.2% 10.6% Percent -34.81\ 55.8% Percent -66.6% -29.0% Percent -28 .6% 74.4%

(27)NOTES'----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

f..V t1412008

14 PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

Gaining Facllity:_,C,_,a:.::s,_pe::r.:P_,&,D::.F ___________________ _


Workhour Costs -Gaining Facility Last Saved: December 19, 2012

11 ~ --··~~ 11 $112.19 u . IlL Am. 14 ........ .,.

" "

PIR Type•: .,:JD,;cs::.:::-i~n:iRpi;;IR=coi:;:u=mn=s:-:~:-a::n:=nu::::a:;;:llz:::ed7toL::r:<Fo:;,.:;-t PIR.

Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 to Mar~1-2012

I ANNUALIZED I

PI R Workhour Costs • Gaining

(1) (2J (3) 4 5 (7) 8 (8] 10 IJ 11 112 13 14 15 18 Annual FHP Volume Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Annual Worthours ; Annual Productivity Annual Wortthour COIU

Operation -- Propooed 1atPIR PntAMI' Propooed 1stPIR PntAMI' Propooed 1atPIR PntAMI' Pro poNd 1atPIR f>nt,AMf' Propooed 1atPIR Numbers

066 $0 so 067 $0 so 150 so $61.520 161 $0 so 172 $0 $34 946 241 so $65,145 484 $0 $28 496 554 $0 S19 107 637 so $20,723

o ac $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No calc $0 $0 0 No-CalC $0 $0 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc so so 0 No CalC so $0 0 No Caic $0 $0 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 $0 0 No Calc $0 so . 0 No Calc $0 $0 0 No Calc so so 0 No CalC $0 so 0 No Calc $0 $0 0 NoCaic $0 $0 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 $0 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc . $0 so 0 . No CalC $0 so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No.Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so

' 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc so so

"' 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so

T 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No CalC so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc so so 0 NoCak: so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so ,, 0 No Calc so so

.. 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No CalC $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc so so 0 NoCatc so so 0 No Calc so so 0 NoCaic so so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No-Calc so so 0 No Calc $0 so 0 No Calc $0 so

PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

(1) 3 4 '

5 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 Annual FHP Volume Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Annual Workhours ' Annual Productivity Annual Workhour Costs

Operation Pre AMP .,.,.,... 1.t:PIR -AMP .,.,..,..., 1stPIR -AMP .,., ...... 1stPIR PnrAMP .,., ...... 1atPIR -- .,.,.,... 1stPIR Numbers

0 No Calc $0 $0 0 No Calc $0 $0

Ad'

Totals 70;801,SGG 70,909,566 141,364,586 190;&G9;888 250;323,822 351,934,430 1'lc,511 82;562 91,215 2;&27 3,032 3,858 $3,117,007 $3,536,935 $3,774,851 --- 1 --- J --- J --- J --- J Variances Annual FHP Volume Variances Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Variances Annual Workhours Variances Annual Productivity Variances Annual Workhour Costs

Change (17) (18) Change (19) (20) Change (21) (22) Change (23) (24) Change (25) (28) Analysis 151 PIR w Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed Analysis tstPIRwPntAW 1st PIR vs Proposed Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre ANI' 1st PIR vs Proposed Analysis tstPIRvsPreAr.t' 1st PIR vs Proposed Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed

Units 70,455,020 70,455,020 Units 161,264,.02 101,610,608 Units 18,637 8,653 Units 1,231 826 Units $657.844 5237,916

Percent 99.4% 99.4% Percent L___~~% 40.6% __ Pe~~~ ___ 25.7~~ 10.5% Percent .6.9•-o 27.3% Percent 21 .1'/o 6.7'ilo ~- - ------ - - --- ----- -- - --~

(27JNOTES: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _

(ltV 1J412008

17 PIR Workhour Costs · Gaining

I Other Workhour Move Analysis I Losing Facility: Gillette CSMPC Casper P&DF Date Range of Data: 10/01111 to 03131/12

PIR Other Wor1<hour Costs

I

Totals 58,746 57,722 61,638 ~ $2,368,626 $2,317,476 $2,613,955 Totals 188,129 189,153 190,012 $7,498,839 $7,549,572 $8,007,869

19

PIR Other Wor1<hour Costs

~ . nnua or our ost

CUOTent

~ MODS

Proposed 1si'PIR Operation Pre,AMP

Number

r1y

80 671 $95,698 $95,698 $88,494 20 705 $216,415 $216,415 $207,777

Proposed 1stPIR

BO $140,522 $140,522 $210,967 20 705 $307,731 $307,731 $366,399 10 700 $216,002 $216,002 $0 35 933 $96,881 $96,881 $155,201 35 951 $8,444 $8,444 $0 10 928 $200,666

I

!

:lU

PIR Olher Wor1<hour Costs

ll I I I I I I I I I I I I

I Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs I

Cps 617, 679, 764 (31)

Cps 765, 766 (34) I :1 :1 :1

22

Propaud

I :1 . :1 - :1 Cps 617, 679, 764 (31)

Ops 765,766 (34) I :1 :1 :1 ,--s:l 5:1 ::1

PIR Other Workhour Costs

Pre AMP Combined

"""""""" Del ...

.. Other Cratr Ops(less Ops going to 'Trans·PVS' 'Maintenance' Tabs 219,025 $8,748,69

Transportation Ops (going to Trans-PVS tab 0 $

Maintenance Ops (going to Maintenance tab 28,144 $1 ,124,46

Supervisory Opt 21,753 $1 ,081 ,69

Supervisor/Craft Jolng OPt 2,161 $69,091

Tota 271,064 $11,023,94

23

Proposed ·Combined

""""""'" Del ...

219,025 $8,748,69

0 s 28,144 $1,124,04€

21 ,753 $1 ,081,69

2,161 $69,091 271,064 $11,023,52

1st PIR ~omblned Special Ad ustments

w""""'""' Dolo .. """""""" Del ...

227,455 59,432,12 0 0 $

25,609 $1,249,50

22,615 $1,229,50<

2,485 $75,411<

278,164 $11.986,61

Losing Facility Summary

l'nlposed Annual

umma rou 1st PIR to Proposed- Change 1st PIR to Pre-AMP - Chan e

1/MnCharQe ,.._Chango Oollal'$Chang8 Pen:ertChaflle WKhrs Change Percent Change Dollar. Change Percert Change

so 8,429 3 .851! $683,427 7.811! 8.429 3.851! $683,427 7.81~

s 0 #OIV/0! so #OIV/01 0 #OIV/01 so #OIV/01

$ -2,535 -9.01 $125,461 11.16 -2,535 -9.01 $125,045 11.12%

$ 882 3.96 $147,811 13.66 882 3.96 $147,811 13.66%

s 324 14.97 $6,393 9.25 324 14.97 $6,393 9.251!

$ 7,080 2.61 $963,093 8.74 7,080 2.61 $962,676 8.73%

7,08 2.61 963,09 8.74 7,08 2.61 962,67 8 730;1:

PIR Other Worl<hour Costs

Staffing - Craft Last Saved: December 19, 2012

PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 05/14/12

Losing Facility: Gillette CSMPC Finance #: 573800

' ( 1)<' (2) Jl' ,, (::i) I (4) • i (li) (6

Casuai/PSE On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls Craft Positions ., . . ,,.

Pre AMP 1st PIR ! •~ PreAMP 1st PIR PreA!':'P 1st PIR

FUilction 1 - CLerk '" 0 0 <M 0 0 0 0 Function 4 - Clerk K ~ 1 0 .,,; 0 < 2i 21 I Function 1 - Mail Handler "'•fi ' 0 0 w~' 0 0 I Function 4 - Mail Handler "' n ,,0 0 ,,,,

0 0 I Function 3A - Vehicle Service " @ 0 0 ., 'fit . 0 0 I Function 38- Maintenance ~Hw' 0 h 1 I Functions 67-69- Ln ,J/Rt,db!WC * .. 0 1 I Other Functions ., "' 0 0 A '11! 1:, 19 I Total I · , 1 0 ,. 2 0 nJl!\ '40 42

\) (7) (8) (9)

Total nn.Rnll"

' pn;. ~j1P Proposed 1st PIR

@; " 0 0 A;; " 26 21 21

" 0 0 0 0

[(! 0 0

' 2 2 1 Cj, 0 1

iJ\ "' 15 15 19 ,, lk 43 38 42

-..._ 1 Variances Total On-Rolls

Change Analysis

Positions Percent

{10) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP

{1 ) -2%

{11)

1st PIR vs ... 4

10.5%

Gaining Facility: Casper P&DF Finance#: 571558

"'; (1~) &;; (13) ~t <H> (15) (20)

Casuai/PSE On-Rolls Part _IiiTlE . On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls Total On-Rolls Craft Positions

1st PIR

Function 1- Cierk * • · 2 11 0 0 @•t26 30 ·'"m 28 33 41 Functi()n_j- Mail Handler ~1w '*" 0 0 2 'm 8 6 '""' "11 12 8 Function 3A - Vehicle Service it 0 0 0 0 i! 11 . 'lit 0 .0

~F~UIJn~ctio~nl~IS~67r·-6~9 -TL~nm~ta/~~colla~u,r~v~---- ~~@ ~&y~-----0~~· ~,"~----~~0 ~v~'~~··~~~· ----~0~--~~0~III Function 38 - Me:uonc11dnce ~ ,,,,, .i;,. 0 h '*· 1: · 12 ' "'""'·M'''.w: 14' 15 13

Other Functions 0 "H 74 73 WJ!%; ·' 75· 75 76 I Total I ", 4 15 1"" if ., 4 2 I@ ·'"''120 121 'it, w-~28 135 138

--- 1 Variances Total On-Rolls

~·-·-·-·-·-·~-·-·-·-·-·-~ I {23) I {24) I

! 1st PIR vs Pre AMP ! 1st PIR vs Proposed ! Total Craft Position Loss: L,_,_,~~_,_,j_,_,J.:L,_,_j

{21) {22) Change

1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs Analysis

PreAMP Proposed

Positions 10 3 Percent 7.8% 2.2%

{Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

I ,: rev 415/10 " ..;

24 PIR Staffing - Craft

Staffing - PCES/EAS

Losing Facility: Gillette CSMPC Data Extraction Date · 6/14/2012

PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Line Position Title Level PreAMP 1st PIR

1 POSTMASTER EAS-22 1 0 2 SUPV CUSTOMER SERVICES EAS-17 3 2 3 POSTMASTER EAS-21 1 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 0 13 0 14 0 15 0 16 0 17 0 16 0 19 0 20 0 21 0 22 0 23 0 24 0 25

,, 0

26 0 27 0 26 0 29 0 30 0 31 0 32 0 33 0 34 0 35 0 36 0 37 0 38 ' 0 39 " 0 40 0 41 0 42 0 43 0 44 0 45 b 46 0 47 0 48 0 49 0 50 0 51 0 52 0 53 0 54 0 55 0 56 0 57 0 58 0 59 0 60 0

Totals 4 3

25

Last Saved: December 19, 2012

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Finance # ..:5.:.;73:.:8~0=-o _ ___ _

On-Rolls

(5) (6) (7)

PreAMP Proposed tstPIR

1 1 0

~ 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

'' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 3 3

~ Variances Total On-Rolls

(15) (16)

Change 1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs Analysis Pre AMP Proposed

Positions 0 0 Percent 0.0% 0.0%

PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS

Gaining Faclllty : ..:C::a:.::s.t:.pe::::r:,:P~&:::D::;F:.,._ _______ _____ _ Data Extraction Date : 511412012

Finance # ..;;5.;..7.;..;15;.;:5..:.8 ____ _

PCES/EAS Posit ions Authorized On-Rolls

Staffing (19) (20) (2l) (22) (23) (24) (25)

Line Position Title Level PreAMP tstPIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR

1 POSTMASTER (F) EAS-24 1 1 1 1 0 2 MGR MAINTENANCE EAS-18 1 1 1 1 1 3 SUPV CUSTOMER SERVICES EAS-17 6 3 3 3 3 4 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 2 2 1 2 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 11 0 0 12 0 0 13 0 0 14 0 0 15 0 0 16 0 0 17 0 0 18 0 0 19 0 0 20 0 0 21 0 0 22 0 0 23 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 0 26 0 0 27 0 0 28 0 0 29 0 0 30 0 0 31 0 0 32 0 0 33 0 0 34 0 0 35 0 0 36 0 0 37 0 0 38 0 0 39 0 0 40 0 0 41 0 0 42 0 0 43 0 0 44 0 0 45 > " 0 ,< 0 46 0 0 47 0 0 48 0 0 49 0 0 50 0 0 51 0 0 52 0 0 53 0 0 54 0 0 55 0 0 56 0 0 57 0 0 58 0 0 59 0 0 60 0 0

Totals 10 7 " 7 4

~ Variances Total On-Rolls

(33) (34)

Change 1st PIR VB 1st PIR VI Analys is Pre AMP Proposed

Positions (2) (3) Percent -33.3% -42.9%

r,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,, j Total PCES/EAS'

1371 '

1381 '

26

j Position Lossj 2 j 3 j ~,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,~,-#_#_#_#_,_,_j_,_,_,_,_,_,_J.

(Above numbers are callied forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS

Transportation - PVS Last Saved: December 19, 2012

PIR Type: 1st PIR ---------------Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 -to- Mar-31-2012 ----------

Losing Facility: -:G:::i:::lle:;:.tt;:::e~C::..:S::..:M..:..:..:....P..=C ________________ _ Finance Number: ...:5;.;_7..:.38.::..0::..:0:...._ _____ _

Gaining Facility:-::C:::a~s~p:=:er;:-P'--&=D=..:...F _________________ _ Finance Number: _5_7_15_5_8 ______ _

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Variance 1st Variance 1st Variance 1st Variance 1st

PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR PIR vs Pre PIRvs PreAMP Proposed PIR PIR vs Pre PIRvs AMP Prooosed AMP Prooosed

PVS Owned Equipment PVS Owned Equipment Seven Ton Trucks 0 0 Seven Ton Trucks 0 0 Eleven Ton Trucks 0 0 Eleven Ton Trucks 0 0 Single Axle Tractors 0 0 Single Axle Tractors 0 0 Tandem Axle Tractors 0 0 Tandem Axle Tractors 0 0 Spotters 0 0 Spotters 0 0

PVS Transportation PVS Transportation Number of Schedules 0 0 Number of Schedules 0 0 Total Annual Mileage 0 0 Total Annual Mileage 0 0

Total Mileage Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Mileage Costs 0 $0 $0 $0

PVS Leases PVS Leases Total Vehides Leased 0 0 0 Total Vehicles Leased 0 0 0

Total Lease Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Lease Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

"'"" PVS Workhour Costs PVS Workhour Costs

LDC 31 (617. 679, 764) $.0 $0 $0 LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $0 $0 $0 LDC 34 (765, 766) $0 $0 $0 LDC 34 (765, 766) $0 $0 $0

~otal Workhour Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Workhour Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: $0 (12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: $0 (This number added to the Executive Summary (This number added to the Executive Summary)

(13) Notes: ____________________________________________________ _

27 PIR Transportation- PVS

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: December 19, 2012

Losing Facility: Gillette CSMPC --------------------------------------------------Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

(1)

Route#

28

Data of HCR Data File: 04/01/12

(2)

PreAMP Annual Mileage

(3)

Proposed Annual Mileage

(4)

1st PIR Annual Mileage

(5)

PreAMP Annual

Cost

(6)

Proposed Annual

Cost

(7)

1st PIR Annual Cost

PIR Type: 1st PIR .

CT for Outbound Dock:

(8)

PreAMP Annual

Cost/Mile

(9)

Proposed Annual

Cost/Mile

(10)

1st PIR Annual

Cost/Mile

PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/Ol

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 ~~. o 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 ' #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!

0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0 !

Totals 150 ~900 249,579 286,647 $291 ,227 $391,443 $503,516 " ------ - - I

Variances Total Annual Costs

(11) (12) Change Analysis

1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed

Dollars $212,290 $112 073 Percent 0.0% 0.0%

29 PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: December 19, 2012

Gaining Facility: Casper P&DF --~-----------------------------------------------

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Oest CET for Inbound Dock:

Date of HCR Data File: CET for Cancellations:

(1 ) I*'

, (~2) (3) (4) (5) 0 " (6) (7) 4:~ w

. Pre'AMP Proposed 1st PIR %:0

Route# Annual Annual Annual Pre AMP Annual Proposed 1st PIR Annual

I+ COst •;.'' Annual Cost Cost Mileage.+· Mileage Mileage

.t\ •. ti BE~ ,-w;

0 !18'·· 0' 0 ' ·i ·~ h $0

0 !;y,·i o 0 ."' ._,,a "'•x ·so 0

k *.,. ·o 0 ·f'' x~,, , $0 _ 0 :B ~ .,. "0 0 ' '" ., "$0, 0 ii:i 0 0 H .: WH -~ TF$()'

0 0 0 'u' ;.' $0s 0 M·' :; 8· 0 0 I+: ' ddj; 40

0 ,;·O: 0 '%!· @ ' g $Q, 0 ' 0 0 "' ~ "··'-, $0 0 ·'4* %! rffi• :,0 0 '. 'f •'-~ A \~$0.

0 ;;;;111 9 ·. "Y' O 0 -+ @.·w'0 . $0 0 , 7::\ .. K '*' 0 , 0 .·_,.,"'' 'v .. $0, 0

. ''" o' 0 ~'f+!!! w. $0 ' 0 "' •<':,""""' ·. ·o.: 0 •~>-. z _m ·'*$0

0 : 'm , ,0 0 .%· '1!' Jp!jh{ •. ' '$0

0 i&f'. •w · o i . 0 "7¥&.2 ,.;: ·* $.0 : 0 .'' :o 0 .. 01··~,. 0 r~i $0

0 p, a'O 0 . ;;r;" ,$0 . 0 a® •. 0 0 -q;, ~··. "' $0 0 "' :w; 0 0 &;

w $0 . 0 / "'" '' R

o· 0 < fil."''" ; ·-~ < $0

0 '@· w ' 0 ' 0 su;;, $0 0 4:'

"' '.0,. 0 ,ifiiJFN&;;Wf'*v $0

0 '"" '.:*~· 0 0 W+ < & ii~i¥" -$0 ,

0 · ~ '"'%: ,·*, ' 0 0 , 50Mtt ;r'?± $0

0 ·~ @:R~i;ll-'. 0 0 r*li " np $0 0 *~;'** ~-, o ~ 0 ,.,. "Ry;Z; ;:, $0 :

~'''i

0 ,, l'i' ,' ;w· 0 0 < $0

0 ;~, "¥' 0 0 ¢), '*\ $U. 0 '$1. '.,,o: 0

., %:$0

0 K 7. ,o 0 14' + $0 0 ~MTI @' .0, 0 jt $0

PIR Type: Orig & Oest

CETforOGP: ------CT for Outbound Dock:

y •1!; (8) (9) (10)

Pre AMP Proposed Annual Annual

1st PIR Annual Cost/Mile

·coSt/Mile Cost/Mile ,,, ,' ''''\ '.,; #DIV/0!

"""' £ #DIV/0!

'? ' ":; .. #DIV/0! + #DIV/0!

; #DIV/0!

;;;; ' ,; #DIV/0! w· 'i if #DIV/0! m

., ' #DIV/0! !;;

&;X #DIV/0!

i ;"" :Th #DIV/0!

1<•1•.., #DIV/0! :.-?.f-

#DIV/0! +·:S

>j ;.;; ·,.; #DIV/0! , .·.u· . "' -'

#DIV/0! ;

·+ #DIV/0!

;:' "· #DIV/0! ';.<Q #DIV/0!

i '"""' ·<. #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

I* w: ,, #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

•. : a 'c- #DIV/0!

" #DIV/0!

iN #DIV/0!

ti #DIV/0! 11! #DIV/0!

"

H #DIV/0! w ' #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0! ~' #DIV/0! ;

·' #DIV/0!

PIR Transportation HCR - Gaining

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 ~v 0 0

0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0

31

$0 #DIV/0!

$0 #DIV/0!

$0 #DIV/0!

$0 #DIV/0!

$0 #DIV/0!

$0 #DIV/0!

$0 '' G #DIV/0!

$0 % #DIV/0!

$0 $0 $0

------- - ::::::::J Variances Total Annual Costs Summary HCR Losing & Gaining

(11) (1 2) Change Analysis

1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed

Dollars $0 $0 Losing

Percent #DIV/01 #DIV/01 Gaining

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

(13)

1st PIR vs Pre AMP

$212 290 .. $0_

$212,290

(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

(14)

1st PIR vs Proposed

$112 073

-jQ_

$112,073

Total Transportation

(15)

1st PIR vs Pre AMP

HCR $212 290 PVS $0

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): $212,290 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16)

1st PIR vs Proposed

$112 073 $0

$112,073

PIR Transportation HCR - Gaining

MPE Inventory Last Saved: December 19, 2012

Data Extraction Date: 05/14/12 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Oct-01 -2011 -to -- Mar-31 -2012

Losing Facility: ...::G:..:.:il::.:le:.:.:tt.:::.e...::C:..::S:.:.:M::.:.P...::C::...._ _______ _ Gaining Facility: ..:C..:a;.;;s,~;;.pe;;.;r....;P..:&::.:D::.:F:..__ __________ _

(1) (2) (3) I" (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Equipment

Proposed 1st PIR Variance in PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Relocation Relocation Costs

Equipment Costs Costs AFCS 0 0 0 AFCS 0 1 2 $70,268 $60,000 ($10,268)

AFSM-ALL 0 0 0 AFSM-ALL 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

APPS 0 0 0 APPS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0:

ClOSS 0 0 0 ClOSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0'

CSBCS 2 . 0 0 CSBCS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0:

DBCS 0 0 .

0 DBCS 0 1 2 $13,440 $9,956 ($3,484)

DBCS-OSS 0 0 0 DBCS-OSS 1 1 1 $0 $0 $0

DIOSS 0 0 0 DIOSS 2 2 2 $0 $0 $0

FSS 0 0 0 FSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

SBPS ·o 0 0 SBPS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

UFSM 0 0 0 UFSM 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

FC I MICRO MARK 1 0 0 FC I MICRO MARK 2 0 0 $0 $0 $0

ROBOT GANTRY 0 0 0 ROBOT GANTRY 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

HSTS/ HSUS 0 0 0 HSTS/ HSUS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

LCTS/ LCUS 0 *' 0 0 LCTS/LCUS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

LIPS 0 0 0 LIPS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

MLOCR-ISS 0 0 0 MLOCR-ISS F 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

MPBCS-OSS 0 0 0 MPBCS-OSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

TABBER 0 0 0 TABBER 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

POWERED .! POWERED : INDUSTRIAL 1 1 1

VEHICLE INDUSTRIAL Iii 3 0 0 $0 $0 $0

VEHICLE

':

4 1 1 Totals 8 5 7 $83,708 $69,956 ($13,752)

ects. ;:,.. .L;"" ';::,...

Carried to noved as per approval of Western Area. Space Evaluation and second DBCS moved as per Worland Other Costs

(10) Notes: Equipment set at Casper shows impacts of multiple AMP proj One AFCS was approved in Gillette package, second AFCS moved as per app One DBCS moved as per Gillette package with costs in PIR, second DBCS moved as p package with costs reflected in the Worland PIR.

32 PIR MPE Inventory

....,., 1HnnnnR

I

LDC 36

LDC37

Total

Maintenance Last Saved: December 19, 2012

Losing Facility: Gillette CSMPC ---------------------------------------

(3) :s (4) i & Variance 1st

(1) II (2) (5) Variance 1st

Workhour Activity Proposed 1stPIR PIR to Pre PIRto

33

$

$

$

~ Costs AMP Proposed

0 $ 92,304 $ 41 ,154 $ 92,304

--209 $ (136) $ (136)

--85;721 $ (82,298) $ (82,298)

-0 $ 0 $ 0

-0 $ 0 $ 0

---

85,930 $ (41,280) $ 9,870

(11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings:

(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:

( 13) Notes: Additional maintenance costs at Casper due to concurrent approved AMPs.

I LDC 36

1 LDC 37

I LDC 38

I LDC39

r----

PIR Type*: _1.:..st'-'-P-'-IR'-'-------Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 ~ Mar-31-2012

Gaining Facility: Casper P&DF --~-------------------------------

Workhour Activity

Grand Total

$250,966

$135,282

(6) I I (

7

) II (8)

I (9)

Variance 1st Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre

Costs Costs AMP

f 581 ,721 $ 711,018 •$ 218,279 $

fit

$ 201,578 $ 79,173 $ I ~

(122.404) $

. ' $ 220,141 $ 219,143 $;

,·l, (998) $

67,234 $ ~~

84,568 ~~~ 17,335 $

--- ;.11' -. 5,691 $ 59,804 $l 54,113 $

ti ~

$ 1,076,384 $ 1,153,707 !$1 166,325 $

1,391,540 $

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

•Data in PIR columns is annualized for First PIR.

(10) Variance 1st

PIR to Pre Proposed

129,298

(122,404)

(998)

17,335

54,113

77,343

37,004

.. - ~ '1 ,.~

114,347

r_~~": ... :; Jev 1~

PIR Maintenance

(1)

Distribution Changes Last Saved: December 19, 2012

Losing Facility : .....;G...:...:il.....;le...:...:tt-=-e-=C-=S..:..:M.:..:.P.....;C=------------- PIR Type: 1st PIR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 --to-- Mar-31-2012

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP.

DMM L001 DMM L011

X DMM L002 X DMM L201

DMM L003 DMM L601

DMM L004 DMM L602

X DMM L005 DMM L603

DMM L006 DMM L604

DMM L007 DMM L605

DMM LOOB DMM L606

DMM L009 DMM L607

DMM L010 DMM L801

Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

<2l Postal Bulletin 22321 (1 0-6-11)

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

<3l Yes

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS

Facility Name Total No-Show Late Arrival 0 en

Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count % Count

Feb '12 Losing Facility 827 GILLETTE 5 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mar '12 Losing Facility 827 GILLETTE 5 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Feb '12 Gaining Facility 826 CASPER 120 25 20.83% 3 2.50% 0 0.00% 85

Mar '12 Gaining Facility 826 CASPER 125 22 17.60% 10 8.00% 0 0.00% 97

(5) Notes: SCFs 824-828 dropped at Casper

Closed %

0.00%

0.00%

70.83%

77.60%

Unschd Count

0

0

0

0

34 PIR Distribution Changes

Losing Facility: Gillette CSMPC

5-Digit ZIP Code: -::8':'27~1"'6:-:-o------Data Extraction Date:..::0.::;5/c.:1..::.4/...:.12=------

Customer Service Issues Last Saved: December 19, 2012

3-Digit ZIP Code: 827 3-Digit ZIP Code:

PreAMP PIR PreAMP

1. Collection Points Mon • • frl. Sal Mon.-Fri. Sal Mon. - Fri. Sal Mon.-Fri. Number picked up before 1 p.m. 12 39 11 36 0 0

Number picked up between 1-5 p.m. 43 18 41 18 0 0

Number picked up after 5 p.m. 6 0 6 0 0 0

Total Number of Collection Points 61 57 58 54 0 0 0

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? I o I

3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? I o I

4. Delivery Performance Report <! PreAMP 1st PIR

Ouarter/FY Percent Ouarter/FY Percent

% Carriers returning before 5 p.m. 01 2011 48.1% 01 2012 39.3%

02 2011 54.5% 02 2012 50.4%

03 2011 50.5% 03 2012

Q4 201'1 44.4% 04 2012

3-Digit ZIP Code:

PIR PreAMP PIR Sat. Mon. - Fri. Sal Mon.-Fri. Sat.

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours

Monda Tuesda

Wednesda

Thursda

Frida·

Sat urea

y

y

y

y

y

y

Start

7:00

7:00

7:00

7:00

7:00

9:00

PreAMP End

17:30 "' 17:30

17:30

17:30

17:30

13:00

Proposed Start End

7:00 17:30

7:00 17:30

7:00 17:30

7:00 17:30

7:00 17:30

9:00 13:00

1st PIR Start

7:00

7:00

7:00

7:00

7:00

9:00

End

17:30

17:30

17:30

17:30

17:30

13:00

Monda·

Tuesda

Wednesda

Thursda

Frida

Saturda

y

y

y

y

y

y

7. Can customers obtain a local postmarik In accordance with applicable policies In the Postal Operations Manual?

8. Notes:

Gaining Facility: -=C:..:a:..:sJ::p=er:....:P:....:&::.D::.F:..._ ______________ _

9. What postmark is printed on collection mail?

CASPER WY 826

35

PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Start End Start End Start End

1!Y.OO 15:30 10:00 15:30 10:00 15:30

10;00 1'5:30 10:00 15:30 10:00 15:30

10:00 15:30 10:00 15:30 10:00 15:30

10;00 15:30 10:00 15:30 10:00 15:30

10:00 15:30 10:00 15:30 10:00 15:30

closed dosed closed closed closed closed

Yes

11111 1/9121l08

G

3-Digit ZIP Code:

Pre AMP PIR Mon, - Fri. Sal Mon.-Fri. Sal

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0

PIR Customer Service issues

D

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: December 19, 2012

Losing Faclllty:..::G::.::il~le:..::lt::::.e..::C:,::S:.:.:M.::.P....::C::__ ____________ _ Date: ________ _

1. Affected Facilny

2. One-Time Costs

Enter any one-time costs:_...;:::S2:.1~5~,oo=o-- $283,857 $68,857 (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.)

3. Savings Information

Space Savings ($): __ ..;$""0 __ _ $0 $0 (These numbers carred forward to the Executive Summary)

4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.

5. Notes: MHE AFCSNFS/Loose Mall System $209,285.94 (lamm); WFSO Sne Prep $74,571 .50 (Downes)

Employee Relocation Costs $0 $0 $0

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs $83,708 $69,956 ($13,752) (from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs $215,000 $283,857 $68,857 (from above)

Total One-Time Costs $298,708 $353,813 $55,1 05 PlR costs carried forward to Executive Summary)

Losing Facility: ....::G::.::ilc:.::leo.:.:tt::::.e....::C:;:S:.:.:M.::.P....::C::__ _______ _ Gaining Faclllty:..::C:::a:.::s.t:.pe::.:r~P...:&:::D::.:F:..._ ______ _

Pre-AMP: FY 2011 Range of Report PIR: FY 2012 YTD

(1) !21 (3) (4) (5) (6) (71 (8) (9) (10)

P,. AMP PraAMP

1stPIR 1st PIR Cost per Product AuoclmdR£C Co1lt per 1,000

Associated REC 1,000 Images Images

Product Pnt AMP Au oclaled p,. AMP 1st PIR 1st PIR Cost per REC Cost per"1poG Associated REC 1,000 Images

lmogn

Letters NA SO .DO NA $0.00

Flats NA $0.00 NA $0.00

PARS COA NA $0.00 NA $0.00

PARS Redirects NA $0.00 NA $0.00

APPS NA SO .DO NA $0.00

36

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

first post implementation review of the gillette (wy ... · current 30 zip code(s): 826 exfc...

Documents