fitting technology options to farmer context in mali

18
Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali Mary Ollenburger, Wageningen University and Research Centre Africa RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016

Upload: africa-rising

Post on 21-Jan-2017

123 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Mary Ollenburger, Wageningen University and Research Centre

Africa RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016

Page 2: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

AfricaRISING sites in Mali

Page 3: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Maize

Sorghum

Soya

Cowpea

On-farm trials of options

Options

INTENSIFICATION

OF CURRENT

CROP

CEREAL

LEGUUME

INTERCROPPING INTE

NSIFI

CATIO

N OF

DIVE

RSIFI

CATIO

N

CROP

S

DIVE

RSIF

ICAT

ION

CROP

SIM

PROV

ED

FEED

ING

OF

LIVES

TOCK

T2Ctrl

T4T3

Intercrop

Falconnier 2015

Page 4: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

???

Analysis of on-farm trials

Falconnier 2015

Page 5: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Average Sorghum yield on clay soils

Average soybean yield on clay soils after cotton

ΔGM = 334 USD/year/ha

!!!

Analysis of on-farm trials

Sorghum

Soya

Grain Yield (kg/ha)

Gros

s mar

gin

(USD

/ha/

year

)

Falconnier 2015

Page 6: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Intensification

of current crops

CEREAL LEGUME

INTERCROPPING Inte

nsifi

catio

n of

di

vers

ifica

tion

crop

s

DIVE

RSIF

ICAT

ION

CROP

Options

CROP DIVERSIFICATION:

Replacement of sorghum by soya

CEREAL LEGUME

INTERCROPPING:

Maize-cowpea

CROP DIVERSIFICATION: replacement of sorghum by cowpea

Niches for developing new systems

Falconnier 2015

Page 7: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Farm types in Koutiala

Falconnier et al. AgSys 2015

Page 8: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

MRE farms – replacement of sorghum by soya

HRE and HRE-LH farms – replacement of maize by maize-cowpea intercrop

LRE farms – replacement of sorghum by cowpea

1 ox

1 cow

1 donkey/calf

Farm-scale explorations: Trade-off analysis

Falconnier 2015

Page 9: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Farm distributions

Page 10: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Solution Space

• Many scenarios, using limited data, to quickly explore options• Input data:

• Household survey at district level for yields, input costs (AfricaRISING baselines), market survey for crop prices

• Rapid characterization of population of 109 farm households in 3 villages (crop areas, livestock and equipment), plus detailed characterization of 19 farms based on types

• Calculated income from crops and food self-sufficiency for each farm in several scenarios

Page 11: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Scenarios

• Yields• 50th percentile (median) yields [MARBES]• 90th percentile (best farmer practice) yields [MARBES]• Experimental potential yields [ICRISAT/IER]

• Prices• Averaged market prices from monthly market survey in

2014-2015

• Calculated income and food self-sufficiency

Page 12: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

• Current crop allocation• Optimized crop allocation

• Maximize gross margins • Meet household calorie requirements with staple grains • Maize area < twice cotton area (fertilizer availability

constraint)

• Crop area expansion

Land use scenarios

Page 13: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Food self-sufficiency

Yield Scenario≥80% food self-sufficient

≥100% food self-sufficient

Median 91% 79%Best farmer 99% 99%Potential 99% 99%

• Median yields: most farms self-sufficient• All other scenarios: all but one farm is self-sufficient

Page 14: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Results: Gross Margins

$1.25/person/day poverty level$1225 mean yearly income from gold mining

Median

Best farmer

Potential

C

C

C

O

O

O

Page 15: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Results: Gross Margins

$1.25/person/day poverty level$1225 mean yearly income from gold mining

Median

Best farmer

Potential

COOO

Page 16: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

What can we learn from simple scenarios?

• “Rapid prototyping” of farm designs to explore potential

• Estimating cost-benefit of a new technology should be a first step not a last step

• Staple crop improvement research should target food-insecure households

• Livestock and off-farm income income sources are important for improving livelihoods

Page 17: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

Typologies for Targeting and Scaling

• Simple indicators allow researchers to place farmers within types

• Important to target a diverse group of farmers for testing technologies

• Farmer evaluations can aid in analysis of variability and in targeting technologies to types

• Ex-post typologies based on initial adoption can be useful for scaling

Page 18: Fitting technology options to farmer context in Mali

IFPRI ARBES teamOusmane Sanogo, Institut d’Economie Rurale

Mouvement Biologique MalienneICRISAT Technicians

The McKnight Foundation

Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generationafrica-rising.net