five other publications · web viewcavitation is a ubiquitous, extremely energetically intense...

25
Cavitation - 1 ARMSTRONG FUND FOR SCIENCE GRANT UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST 1. Co-Principal Investigator: Sheila Patek, Assistant Professor, Biology Dept. 2. Building: 221 Morrill Science Center South Phone: 413-577-4426 Email: [email protected] 3. a) Rank: Assistant Professor b) Highest Degree: Ph. D. c) When received: 2001 d) Date of 1 st appoint to University: August, 2009 4. Brief Title of Proposal: The evolution of cavitation in biological systems and biologically-inspired design 5. Date to be started: June 1, 2011 Probable completion date: May 31, 2013 6. A non-technical statement of the objectives of this project: The goal of this proposal is to launch a new research program at the interface of engineering, physics and biology to understand and apply the extreme energetic fluid dynamic phenomenon called cavitation. The nanosecond collapse of cavitation bubbles in water emits light, generates temperatures equivalent to the surface of the sun and loud bursts of sound. Engineers have tackled cavitation as it wears away steel boat propellers, physicists have studied it as a potential source of fusion, and biologists have examined the many biological systems in which it occurs. Our goal is to integrate these three fields for the first time through a collaborative research proposal which takes a remarkable biological system, the mantis shrimp, that harnesses cavitation power to process prey. Making use of the 300 million years of evolutionary history which have shaped the mantis shrimp’s use of cavitation, we will use direct measurements of shrimp, engineering mechanical models and computational fluid dynamics to characterize, measure and experiment with the parameters of a successful biological system. The ultimate outcome of this research will be a new vision for cavitation science in which biology has the potential to inspire and inform engineering design of both cavitation resistant systems and systems that harness cavitation energy. 7. Amount Requested for the Patek Lab $ 20,000 (Year 1 $10,000; Year 2 $10,000)

Upload: dangkhuong

Post on 29-Mar-2019

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Cavitation - 1

ARMSTRONG FUND FOR SCIENCE GRANTUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST

1. Co-Principal Investigator: Sheila Patek, Assistant Professor, Biology Dept.

2. Building: 221 Morrill Science Center South Phone: 413-577-4426

Email: [email protected]

3. a) Rank: Assistant Professor b) Highest Degree: Ph. D. c) When received: 2001

d) Date of 1st appoint to University: August, 2009

4. Brief Title of Proposal: The evolution of cavitation in biological systems and biologically-inspired design

5. Date to be started: June 1, 2011 Probable completion date: May 31, 2013

6. A non-technical statement of the objectives of this project:

The goal of this proposal is to launch a new research program at the interface of engineering, physics and biology to understand and apply the extreme energetic fluid dynamic phenomenon called cavitation. The nanosecond collapse of cavitation bubbles in water emits light, generates temperatures equivalent to the surface of the sun and loud bursts of sound. Engineers have tackled cavitation as it wears away steel boat propellers, physicists have studied it as a potential source of fusion, and biologists have examined the many biological systems in which it occurs. Our goal is to integrate these three fields for the first time through a collaborative research proposal which takes a remarkable biological system, the mantis shrimp, that harnesses cavitation power to process prey. Making use of the 300 million years of evolutionary history which have shaped the mantis shrimp’s use of cavitation, we will use direct measurements of shrimp, engineering mechanical models and computational fluid dynamics to characterize, measure and experiment with the parameters of a successful biological system. The ultimate outcome of this research will be a new vision for cavitation science in which biology has the potential to inspire and inform engineering design of both cavitation resistant systems and systems that harness cavitation energy.

7. Amount Requested for the Patek Lab $ 20,000 (Year 1 $10,000; Year 2 $10,000)*NOTE: the total request for the proposal is $40,000 with $20,000 requested for Patek and $20,000 requested for Modarres-Sadeghi

8. Signatures:A. Principal Investigator: ____________________________________ Date: ______________

B. Department Head/Chair: __________________________________ Date: ______________

C. Dean: _________________________________________________ Date: ______________

Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
I really like the summary! Parts that confused m in the main proposal (which I accidentally read first) were made clearer here.

Cavitation - 2

ARMSTRONG FUND FOR SCIENCE GRANT

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST

1. Co-Principal Investigator: Yahya Modarres-Sadeghi Dept: Mechanical and Industrial Eng.

2. Building:Gunness 10B Phone: 413-545-2468

Email: [email protected]

3. a) Rank: Assistant Professor b) Highest Degree: PhD c) When received: 2006

d) Date of 1st appoint to University: September 2009

4. Brief Title of Proposal: The evolution of cavitation in biological systems and biologically-inspired design

5. Date to be started: June 1, 2011 Probable completion date: May 31, 2013

6. A non-technical statement of the objectives of this project:

7. Amount Requested for Modarres-Sadeghi lab $ 20,000 (Year 1 $ 10,000; Year 2 $ 10,000)*NOTE: the total request for the proposal is $40,000 with $20,000 requested for Patek and $20,000 requested for Modarres-Sadeghi

8. Signatures:A. Principal Investigator: ____________________________________ Date: ______________

B. Department Head/Chair: __________________________________ Date: ______________

C. Dean: _________________________________________________ Date: ______________

Cavitation - 3

ARMSTRONG FUND FOR SCIENCE GRANTUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST

1. Co-Principal Investigator: David P. Schmidt Dept: Mechanical and Industrial Eng.

2. Building: Marston 210B Phone: (413) 545-1393

Email: [email protected]

3. a) Rank: Associate Professor b) Highest Degree: Ph.D. c) When received: 1997

d) Date of 1st appoint to University: 2000

4. Brief Title of Proposal:

The evolution of cavitation in biological systems and biologically-inspired design

5. Date to be started: June 1, 2011 Probable completion date: May 31, 2013

6. A non-technical statement of the objectives of this project:

7. Total AFS Amount Requested $ _____0______ (Year 1 $ ____0_____; Year 2 $ _____0_)

8. Signatures:A. Principal Investigator: ____________________________________ Date: ______________

B. Department Head/Chair: __________________________________ Date: ______________

C. Dean: _________________________________________________ Date: ______________

Cavitation - 4

Figure·1. The cigar-sized Peacock mantis shrimp use a pair of large raptorial appendages (top, white arrow) to strike hard objects with such high speeds that cavitation bubbles form between the appendage and striking surface. In a series of high speed video images (5000 frames per second), the dactyl heel of the raptorial appendage strikes a snail that is loosely wired to a stick. Images recorded at 0.2·ms intervals. Cavitation (yellow arrow) is visible between the dactyl

The evolution of cavitation in biological systems and biologically-inspired design

Cavitation is a ubiquitous, extremely energetically intense phenomenon which concerns nearly every branch of science and engineering that deals with liquids at low pressure. Under very low pressures, molecules are literally pulled away from each other to form a vapor bubble that collapses in a nanosecond implosion. This implosion occurs with such intense energy that it emits light, sound, and heat equivalent to the surface of the sun, light and sound (Brennen, 1995). Cavitation science has run in three parallel tracks for the past century. Engineers model and try to avoid cavitation damage in engineered systems, physicists attempt to control cavitation and characterize energetics (Brennen, 1995), and biologists observe its occurrence in systems ranging from desiccating plants and exploding fungi to newly breathing insects and fast-moving aquatic animals (Milburn, 1970; Patek and Caldwell, 2005; Patek et al., 2004; Perks et al., 2004; Ritman and Milburn, 1990; Woods et al., 2009). Yet, beyond an occasional study that attempts to in which the characterization ofcharacterize (or solve?) the basic math of biological cavitation is attempted (Lohse et al., 2001; Smith, 1991; Versluis et al., 2000), these scientific and engineering worlds have remained separate, in spite of the substantial ongoing research and interest in cavitation across all of these fields. Most notably, to our knowledge, no attempts have been made to learn about the evolution of biological cavitation design and apply it to human-engineered systems. Thus, our goal is to bring three UMass laboratories together to build an entirely new research program at the interface of biological evolution and engineering design. We will ground this study on the physics, engineering and biology of cavitation control and avoidance in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda).

The century of engineering and physics research on cavitation is dwarfed by the hundreds of millions of years over which biological systems have been tackling cavitation costs and energetic potential. Given, that While bbiological systems have had the opportunity to respond to natural selection over over that time periodvery long timescales to deal with these energetically extreme phenomena, hhumans have not yet made use of thethe unique opportunity to understand the resulting design of cavitation-generating devices and cavitation-resistant devices in biology by studying knowledge that can be gleaned from the natural experiments performed over evolutionary history. and the resulting design of cavitation-generating devices and cavitation-resistant devices in biology. We propose to launch a new research program examining the evolution of cavitating systems in biology and their potential for inspiring and informing engineering design of cavitating systems. This research has two primary goals:

(1) To quantitatively characterize the biological response over evolutionary history to cavitation, specifically testing how cavitation can be wielded constructively and also how self-structural damage caused by cavitation bubble collapse can be avoided.

(2) To synthesize the evolutionary biological design principles of cavitation, both from fluid dynamic and material perspectives, toward the goal of informing the design of human-engineered devices to both use cavitation energetics and minimize cavitation damage.

Present on the planet for approximately 300 million years with over 500 fossil and extant species, mantis shrimp have extremely fast-rotating appendages that they use to hammer or spear prey. When hammering, the peacock mantis shrimp’s appendages move at peak speeds of 20 m/s such that when they strike their hard-shelled prey, a cavitation bubble is formed

Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
I’m not sure if these edits improved the sentence, but I was just trying to clarify it a bit. I got a bit lost when I read the original sentence.
Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
This sounds really awesome!
Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
While I think this sentence definitely gets the point across that cavitation is important, it was a bit of a mouthful for me.

Figure 2. Force generated when a mantis shrimp strikes with both raptorial appendages. Based on the high-speed video and acoustic analyses, the two higher peak forces were generated by limb impact and the two lower peaks were generated during cavitation bubble collapse (Patek and Caldwell, 2005; Patek et al., 2004; Patek et al., 2007).

Cavitation - 5

between their appendage and the prey’s surface (Patek et al., 2004) (Fig. 1). The result is that mantis shrimp generate two extremely high and brief force-peaks each time an appendage strikes the prey; the first peak is due to the impact of the appendage and the second is due to the implosion of the cavitation bubble (Patek and Caldwell, 2005) (Fig. 2). This research is the first to measure and characterize the forces of cavitation bubble collapse in a biological prey capture system, and biologists and engineers have become increasingly interested in the ability of this biological system to resist cavitation damage and to use it effectively for processing prey.

The Patek lab focuses on the biomechanics of extremely rapid prey capture events and has developed techniques such as piezoelectronic impact sensors to measure impact and cavitation forces, extreme high speed video to visualize rapid movements, materials testing for characterization of elastic materials, Computed Tomography (CT) scanning to build 3-D computer models for finite element analysis, and acoustic analyses to quantitatively detect cavitation. While these biomechanical approaches have yielded a strong descriptive? foundation for understanding the biology and evolution of fast movements, the quantitative and computational modeling of these fast movements have remained beyond the skillset of the biologists who populate the Patek laboratory. Through a spontaneous interaction between Patek and Modarres-Sadeghi at one of Chancellor Holub’s junior faculty breakfasts last spring, the first window into a far more rigorous computational and modeling approach was opened.

At the Fluid-Structure Interactions (FSI) Lab, Modarres-Sadeghi and his colleagues focus on bio-inspired fast-start mechanisms. For example, Tthey have built a robotic fish which accelerates at 40 m/s2, in order to understand the basic mechanisms and scaling laws involved in such fast starts (Conte et al., 2010). The aim of this research at the FSI lab is to establish a reverse-engineering methodology combining experimentation with on a robotic device with lessons learned from evolutionary changes of live animals. The final goal is to create , in order to lead to innovative biologically-inspired designs of man-made vehicles with high efficiency in maneuvering. We will use the experience gained in building this fast-movement mechanism in designing and quantifying the experimental component of the proposed research.

Emerging from this nascent collaboration, the first biologically-inspired, cavitating physical model was built this fall through the efforts of an engineering graduate student, Suzanne Cox, working in both the Modarres-Sadeghi and Patek labs. With this novel, biologically inspired model and a laboratory full of the real cavitating animals, a third member of the collaboration was needed – an engineer with the ability to computationally model cavitation. Remarkably, a third UMass professor was found – David Schmidt – who has designed and modeled cavitation devices in engineered systems (Schmidt and Corradini, 1997; Schmidt et al., 1997; Schmidt et al., 1999).

With the team and place and thus poised to launch a new collaborative research program, we now must begin the search forseek initial funding to collect enough preliminary data to justify a full grant application. Specifically, we will pursue funding through NSF’s Cyber-Enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) program and through ONR’s on-going support of cavitation research under its Broad Agency Announcements (Schmidt is a past winner of the Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Prize). We plan to work as a team to generate enough preliminary results, working as a team, thatto establishes credibility with our potential sponsors. Toward this goal, we plan to integrate biology and engineering analysis of cavitation through a three-pronged approach, integrating the biology of mantis shrimp, physical models of biologically-inspired cavitators, and mathematical models of cavitation using computational fluid dynamic technique.

Beginning with the biological approach, cavitation and cavitation dynamics will be examined across a wide range of live mantis shrimp species. The remarkable diversity of mantis shrimp appendages and feeding

Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
Are you able to look at dynamics or just presence/absence of the bubble. The way te paragraph is written now, it seems like you could only get presence/absence.
Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
This sentence confused me. Do you mean the lab’s experience will help you to create a stomatopod model that you can then do experiments on?I just read the next paragraph. Since, you have the stomatopod, does that mean that the experiments will be based in the lab’s previous experiments?
Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
Woah, cool!
Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
I’m not sure if descriptive is the right word, but I was trying to think of a way to biefly deribe the difference between the approaches that have been used and the modeling. It might be nice to have a brief phrase here that described how the computational modeling will contribute in new ways.

Cavitation - 6

strategies offers a rich array of kinematics and appendage shapes with which to observe the presence, absence and use of cavitation. Two in-depth studies have been completed in one cigar-sized mantis shrimp species that uses a hammer (Odontodactylus scyllarus) and a foot-long mantis shrimp species that uses an elongate spear to grab unsuspecting prey overhead (Lysiosquillina maculata). The Patek lab is continuing to collect, film and analyze strike mechanics across a wide range of species from which key information about the speed, acceleration, and the presence and absence of cavitation bubbles can be examined. In addition, we have scanned a wide array of species using micro-CT, converted them into 3-D virtual appendages and have built physical models (rapid prototyping) and finite element models for dynamic testing.

With the comparative kinematic, shape and mechanical data in hand from the actual biology, the second prong of the investigation can tackle the dynamics of cavitation in a controlled setting using the mechanical model of a mantis shrimp. By attaching a range of different shape appendages made of a variety of materials (e.g., plastics to metals) and running the tests across kinematic parameters both relevant to the biological systems and beyond the observed range in biology, the physical space of cavitation and impact dynamics can be characterized. This model approach is critical; it allows us to control for many aspects of appendage strikes, which otherwise would not be possible with the natural behavioral variability of live mantis shrimp, while also allowing for the use of completely accurate mantis shrimp appendage shapes made from models derived directly from the animals.

The third prong of the investigation is to conduct an analysis of cavitation using a fully computational approach, called computational fluid dynamics (CFD). In this case, the appendage can be idealized in a wide range of shapes and moved through the fluid at variable speeds, yet thus? with CFD, it is possible to fully characterize the fluid dynamic flow and energetics of the appendage. This third level of analysis brings the collaboration full circle; it allows for a fully quantitative characterization of cavitation dynamics that can be directly applied to the design of cavitation resistant or cavitation enhancing devices.

The culmination of this research will be a novel examination of the evolution of biological cavitation yielding information valuable to the fields of evolutionary biology, biomechanics, engineering mechanics and biologically-inspired design. This last component is perhaps the closest link to the “anticipated application of outcomes” central to the Armstrong Fund’s mission. In addition to the key contributions to basic research, we will ultimately develop a quantitative space of shape and kinematics that allows the overlay of the biological evolutionary “space” of cavitation phenomena with the theoretical engineering “space”. This quantitative model space provides a mechanism to look at the overlap between evolutionarily possible/observed phenomena, engineering theoretical space and the actual space currently used by engineers in their designed systems. This analysis provides a quantitative window into the potential application of outcomes, such that we both build and design configurations that are not currently used in engineering systems and that could potentially optimize cavitation control or cavitation damage resistance not previously attempted in engineered systems.

References CitedBrennen, C. E. (1995). Cavitation and bubble dynamics: Oxford University Press.Conte, J., Modarres-Sadeghi, Y., Watts, M. N., Hover, F. S. and Triantafyllou, M. S. (2010). A fast-starting robotic fish that accelerates at 40 m s-2 Journal of Bioinspiration and Biomimetics 5, 035004.Lohse, D., Schmitz, B. and Versluis, M. (2001). Snapping shrimp make flashing bubbles. Nature 413, 477-478.Milburn, J. A. (1970). Cavitation and osmotic potentials of Sordaria ascospores. New Phytologist 69, 133-141.Patek, S. N. and Caldwell, R. L. (2005). Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: strike forces of the peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus). Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3655-3664.Patek, S. N., Korff, W. L. and Caldwell, R. L. (2004). Deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp. Nature 428, 819-820.Patek, S. N., Nowroozi, B. N., Baio, J. E., Caldwell, R. L. and Summers, A. P. (2007). Linkage mechanics and power amplification of the mantis shrimp's strike. Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3677 - 3688.Perks, M. P., Irvine, J. and Grace, J. (2004). Xylem acoustic signals from mature Pinus sylvestris during an extended drought. Annals Of Forest Science 61, 1-8.Ritman, K. T. and Milburn, J. A. (1990). The acoustic detection of cavitation in fern sporangia. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1157-1160.Schmidt, D. P. and Corradini, M. L. (1997). Analytical prediction of the exit flow of cavitating orifices. Atomization and Sprays 7, 603-616.Schmidt, D. P., Rutland, C. J. and Corradini, M. L. (1997). A numerical study of cavitating flow through various nozzle shapes. Transactions of the SAE.Schmidt, D. P., Rutland, J. and Corradini, M. L. (1999). A fully compresible model of small, high speed, cavitating nozzle flows. Atomization and Sprays 9, 255-276.

Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
This is great, I totally get how it all comes together now.
Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
I’m not sure I’m sold here. For some reason, I’m not seeing how characterizing fluid dynamics of the appendage will help us to design cavitation resistant devices. I guess it coms back to the fact that mantis shrimp are so good at resisting cavitation? If so, maybe just remind the reader of this briefly.
Maya deVries, 01/22/11,
Super cool. I’m sold!

Cavitation - 7

Smith, A. M. (1991). Negative Pressure Generated By Octopus Suckers: A Study of the Tensile Strength of Water in Nature. Journal of Experimental Biology 157, 257-271.Versluis, M., Schmitz, B., von der Heydt, A. and Lohse, D. (2000). How snapping shrimp snap: through cavitating bubbles. Science 289, 2114-2117.Woods, H. A., Sprague, J. C. and Smith, J. N. (2009). Cavitation in the embryonic tracheal system of Manduca sexta. Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 3296-3304.

Cavitation - 8

S. N. PATEKDepartment of Biology

Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Graduate ProgramUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA

Phone: (413) 577-4426Email: [email protected]

Website: www.bio.umass.edu/biology/pateklab

PROFESSIONAL PREPARATIONHarvard University, Cambridge, MA. Biology A.B. with Honors, 1994 Duke University, Durham, NC. Biology Ph.D. 2001Miller Institute, UC Berkeley Comparative biomechanics 2001-2004

APPOINTMENTS2009-present Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.2008-2009 Radcliffe Fellow, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Studies, Harvard University.2005-2009 Assistant Curator, University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, CA.2004-2009 Assistant Professor, Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley.2001-2004 Postdoctoral Fellow, Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California

Berkeley.PUBLICATIONS

Available at: http://www.bio.umass.edu/biology/pateklab/publicationsFive publications most closely related to the proposed project (* undergraduate-level co-author):Claverie, T., E. Chan* and S.N. Patek. 2010. Modularity and scaling in fast movements: power amplification in

mantis shrimp. Evolution(published online).Zack*, T.I., T. Claverie, and S.N. Patek. 2009. Elastic energy storage in the mantis shrimp’s fast predatory strike.

Journal of Experimental Biology 212: 4002-4009.Patek, S.N., B. N. Nowroozi*, J. E. Baio*, R. L. Caldwell and A. P. Summers. 2007. Linkage mechanics and

power amplification of the mantis shrimp’s raptorial strike. Journal of Experimental Biology 210: 3677-3688.Patek, S.N. and R. L. Caldwell. 2005. Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: strike forces

of the peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylusscyllarus). Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 3655-3664.Patek, S.N., W.L. Korff and R.L. Caldwell. 2004. Deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp. Nature428:819-

820.Five other publications related to the proposed project:Patek, S.N., D. Dudek, M.V. Rosario*.Accepted pending minor revisions.From bouncy legs to poisoned arrows:

elastic movements in invertebrates.Journal of Experimental Biology.Taylor, J.R.A. and S.N. Patek. 2010. Ritualized fighting and biological armor: the impact mechanics of the mantis

shrimp’s telson. Journal of Experimental Biology.213: 3496-3504.Patek, S.N., J.E. Baio*, B. L. Fisher, and A. V. Suarez. 2006. Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: ballistic

jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(34): 12787-12792.Patek, S.N. and T.H. Oakley. 2003. Comparative tests of evolutionary tradeoffs in a palinurid lobster acoustic

system. Evolution 57(9): 2082-2100.Patek, S.N. 2001. Spiny lobsters stick and slip to make sound. Nature 411: 153-154.

AWARDSRadcliffe Fellowship for “scholars, scientists, artists, and writers of exceptional promise and demonstrated

accomplishments“.Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Studies, Harvard University.2008-9 ($80,000).Christopher Clavius, S.J. Award “given to a researcher who also serves as an inspiration to others”. Sigma Xi, St.

Joseph’s University. 2009.Bartholomew Award “for distinguished contributions to comparative physiology”.Society for Integrative and

Comparative Biology. 2008.Hellman Award to junior faculty with “promise for distinction in their research” ($25,000). 2007.

Cavitation - 9

Brilliant 10 Award, awarded annually to ten of the “most dynamic, promising young researchers at institutions around North America” by Popular Science magazine. 2004.

Best Student Paper Award, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2000.

Best Student Paper Award, The Crustacean Society. 2000.Philanthropic Education Organization Scholar Award ($7000).1999-2000.

GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPSNational Science Foundation IOB ($330,000).2007-2010.Research Initiative Seed Grant – Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology.2005-7.Junior Faculty Research Grants, University of California Berkeley (net $24,254). 2004-6.Miller Postdoctoral Fellowship, University of California Berkeley ($180,000).2001-2004.National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant ($9812).1999-2000.National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.1996-2000.Seven grants under $5000. 1997-1999.

SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES

(1) Innovations in teaching and training: Introductory Biology (co-developed a new honors physics- and math-based lecture and lab course), Invertebrate Zoology (co-developed a new lab, lecture, and field research course), research seminars in: Phylogeny-based methods in biomechanics and behavior, Biomechanics, Animal Behavior, UC Berkeley Presidential Chair Fellow for undergraduate education (program designed to develop novel undergraduate teaching methods).

(2) Broadening participation at the university level: Advisory board for the Biology Scholars Program, Biology Fellows Program, and Biology Transfer Consortium (UC Berkeley programs designed to train and encourage minorities and economically disadvantaged students), co-founder and primary faculty member for a “Women in Science” graduate student group (UC Berkeley) that addresses strategies for success in the sciences, panels to discuss the role of Women in Science (including a recent panel at MIT), mentored 25+ undergraduate research projects, including a majority of women, and students from diverse backgrounds (e.g., Hispanic, Native American, African American, Filipino) with multiple students receiving prestigious McNair fellowships.

(3) Broadening participation at the community level: Numerous public outreach lectures including a TED Talk (38,000 views on YouTube) and a New York Public Library “NYPL LIVE” live/broadcast lecture, many museum exhibits and public education websites (e.g., National Museum of Natural History, Morehead Planetarium, Science Museum of Minnesota, London Science Museum).

(4) Broadening participation at the international level: More than 20 TV and radio programs, hundreds of print and web-based articles (e.g., BBC TV, Animal Planet, History Channel, National Geographic, BBC, CBC, NPR, Living on Earth, AAAS, New York Times, USA Today, Natural History Magazine, Science News, Discover Magazine [“best of the year” science story], Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, Nature, Science).

(5) Service to the scientific community outside of the individual’s immediate organization: NSF review panel member (2002), Associate Editor for Functional Ecology (8/2010-2013), Chair of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Student Support Committee (2009-2012), Steering Committee for the Five College Coastal and Marine Science Committee (2009-2012), reviewer for 29 journals and presses.

COLLABORATORS & OTHER AFFILIATIONS

Collaborators and co-editors: J. Baio (U. Washington), R. Caldwell (UC Berkeley), T. Claverie (UMass Amherst), M. S. deVries (UC Berkeley), R. Feldman (Kent State U.), B. Fischer (Cal. Acad. of Sciences), M. Fischer (St. Joseph U.), N. Money (Miami U.), B. Nowroozi (Brown U.), M. Porter (U. Maryland BC), A. Pringle (Harvard U.), L. E. Shipp (Scripps Inst. Oceanography), J. Spagna (William Paterson U.), E. Staaterman (U. of Miami), A. Suarez (U. Illinois Champagne-Urbana), A. Summers (U. Washington), B. Swanson (Gonzaga U.), J. Taylor (UC Berkeley), D. Tshudy (Edinboro U.), N. Tsutsui (UC Irvine), T. I. Zack (Harvard U.).

Cavitation - 10

Biographical Sketch of Yahya Modarres-SadeghiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003http://mielsvr1.ecs.umass.edu/fsi/

Education

2006 Ph.D. of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada2001 Master’s of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran1998 Bachelor’s of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Employment History

2009-present Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,University of Massachusetts,Amherst, MA, USA

2006-2009 Postdoctoral Associate, Department of Mechanical Engineering.Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA

2007-2009 Instructor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology (MIT), Department of Mechanical Engineering, NortheasternUniversity, Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts at Boston

2002-2006 Research Assistant, Fluid-Structure Interactions Research GroupMcGill University, Montreal, Canada

Publications

Most closely related to the proposed project

1. J. Conte, Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, M.N. Watts, F.S. Hover, M.S. Triantafyllou (2010). A Fast-Starting Robotic Fish that Accelerates at 40 ms-2. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics5 035004.

2. Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, M.P. Païdoussis (2009). Nonlinear dynamics of extensible fluid conveying pipes, supported at both ends. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 25, 535-543.

3. Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, M.P. Païdoussis, C. Semler, E. Grinevich (2008). Experiments on Vertical Slender Flexible Cylinders Clamped at Both Ends and Subjected to Axial Flow.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366, 1275–1296.

4. Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, C. Semler, M. Wadham-Gagnon, M.P. Païdoussis (2007). Dynamics of Cantilevered Pipes Conveying Fluid. Part 3: Three-Dimensional Dynamics in the Presence of anEnd-Mass. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 23, 589-603.

5. E. de Langre, M.P. Païdoussis, O. Doaré, Y. Modarres-Sadeghi (2007). Flutter of Long Cantilevered Cylinders in Axial Flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 571, 371 – 389.

Other significant publications

1. Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, F. Chasparis, M.S. Triantafyllou, M. Tognarelli, P. Beynet (2011). Chaotic Response is a Generic Feature of Vortex Induced Vibrations of Flexible Risers. Journal of Sound and Vibration. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2010.12.007.

2. Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, H. Mukundan, J.M. Dahl, F.S. Hover, M.S. Triantafyllou (2010). The Effect of Higher Harmonic Forces on Fatigue Life of Marine Risers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329, 43-55.

3. H. Mukundan, Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, J.M. Dahl, F.S. Hover, M.S. Triantafyllou (2009). Monitoring Fatigue Damage on Marine Risers. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 25, 617-628.

4. Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, M.P. Païdoussis, C. Semler (2008). Three Dimensional Oscillations of aCantilever Pipe Conveying Fluid. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 43, 18-25.

5. Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, M.P. Païdoussis, C. Semler (2005). A Nonlinear Model for an Extensible Slender Flexible Cylinder Subjected to Axial Flow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 21, 609-627,Addendum 22, 597.

Cavitation - 11

Synergistic Activities

The PI was involved in developing online course materials for Dynamics and Control I in Fall 2007for Open Course Ware (Sanjay Sarma, Nicholas Makris, Yahya Modarres-Sadeghi, and Peter So,course materials for 2.003J/1.053JDynamics and Control I, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare(http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

The PI has organized a one-day workshop on Fluid-Structure Interaction with the aim of bringing together well-known researchers and students (undergraduate and graduate), in order to provide the opportunity for students to be in contact with the researches and get a better feeling of research.

The PI has started building a Fluid-Structure Interaction lab at University of Massachusetts, Amherst, which will be used both for research activities similar to what is discussed in the proposed study here, and for educational goals for undergraduate and graduate courses. He is developing a course on FSI, in which students will use the facilities in the FSI lab in order to conduct experiments which help them understand the fundamentals of Fluid-Structure Interactions.

CollaboratorsMichael S. Triantafyllou, Mechanical Engineering, MITMichael P. Païdoussis. Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Canada (PhD Advisor)Robert Blake, Zoology, University of British Columbia, CanadaLuca Caracoglia, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University

Other AffiliationsResearch Affiliate at the Department of Mechanical Engineering of Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology (MIT)

The PI has also worked as a Reviewer for the following journals:

The Journal of Fluid Mechanics Journal of Fluids and Structures Sound and Vibration Proceedings of the Royal Society A Computers and Structures Journal of Marine Science and Technology International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow Mechanics Research Communications Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics ASME Journal of Vibration and Acoustics

Cavitation - 12

1DAVID P. SCHMIDT

Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

University of Massachusetts-Amherst

Experience

University of Massachusetts, Amherst 9/00-presentAssociate Professor (as of 9/06), Graduate Program Director (as of 7/09)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan Automotive Lab 1/99-8/00Visiting ScientistCo-founder of Convergent Thinking, LLC consulting firm 12/97-11/03OwnerUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison 8/93-12/98Research Assistant, Lecturer, Post-doctoral researcher

EducationPh.D. Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin, Madison 1997Minor in Nuclear Engineering, advised by M. CorradiniM.S. Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University 1993Advised by C. KrugerB.S. Mechanical Engineering at North Carolina State University 1992

Fellowships, Awards, and HonorsRalph Teetor Educational Award, given by SAE International, 2009Fellowship to the Institute of Advanced Study, University of Bologna, 2006Best Paper in Conference, ASME Internal Combustion Engine Div., 2003College of Engineering Commencement Speaker, 2003.Student-selected MIE Professor of the Year, 2003.Student-selected MIE Advisor of the Year, 2003Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Award, 2002.Semester Tuition Award from Chevron, University of Wisconsin, 1994. Myers-Uyhara Scholarship, University of Wisconsin, 1993.Departmental Research Fellowship, Stanford University, 1993.Graduated Magna Cum Laude, NCSU, 1992.John T. Caldwell Alumni Scholarship, NCSU, 1988-1992

Five Most Relevant Publications (of 37 journal & 42 conf. papers)Shaoping Quan, David Schmidt, Jinsong Hua, Jing Lou, “A numerical study of the relaxation and breakup of an

elongated drop in a viscous liquid,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 640, 237 - 266, 2009..Shaoping Quan , Jing Lou, David P. Schmidt, “Modeling Merging and Breakup in the Moving Mesh Interface

Tracking Method for Multiphase Flow Simulations,” Journal of Computational Physics, 228(7), 2009.Shaoping Quan and David Schmidt, "A moving mesh interface tracking method for 3D incompressible two-phase

flows," Journal of Computational Physics, 221(2), 2007.J. Murphy, D. Schmidt, S. P. Wang, and Michael L. Corradini, “Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Multiphase Flow

Physics: High-Speed Nozzle and Jet Flows—A Case Study,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 204, pp. 177-190, 2001.

David P. Schmidt, C. J. Rutland, and M. L. Corradini, “A Fully Compressible Two-Dimensional Model of High Speed Cavitating Nozzles,” Atomization and Sprays, 9, 1999.

Cavitation - 13

Five Other PublicationsD. P. Schmidt, S. Gopalakrishnan, H. Jasak, “Multidimensional Simulation of Thermal Non-Equilibrium Channel

Flow,” Intl. J. of Multiphase Flow, 36, 284-292, 2010.J. Lee, R. Madabhushi, C. Fotache, S. Gopalakrishnan, , and D. Schmidt, “Flashing Flow of Superheated Jet

Fuel,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32(2), 2009..S. Gopalakrishnan and David P. Schmidt, “A Computational Study of Flashing Flow in Fuel Injector Nozzles,”

SAE Int. J. Engines 1(1), 160-170, 2008.Matthew J. Frain, David P. Schmidt, Yong-Le Pan, and Richard Chang, “Selective Classification and

Concentration of Flowing Aerosols,” J. of Aerosol Science and Technology, 40(3), 2006.Shuhai Hou and David P. Schmidt, “Adaptive Collision Meshing and Satellite Droplet Formation in Spray

Simulations,” Int. J. of Multiphase Flow, 32(8), 2006.

Synergistic ActivitiesBoard member of the Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS), 2009-present.Member of the Editorial Board for Atomization and Sprays, 2005-present.Editor of the Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS) newsletter, 2006-present.Currently pursuing research sponsored by the Army Research Office, Air Force, National Science Foundation,

General Motors, and NASA.Recently developed a new graduate class in Computational Fluid DynamicsA reviewer for Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Atomization and Sprays, Society for Automotive Engineering

Congress, American Society of Mechanical Engineering Internal Combustion Engine Div., Journal of Computational Physics, Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, Journal of Engineering and Power, Journal of Heat Transfer and Intl. Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics.

Doctoral Students and Current AffiliationDr. Matt Frain, 2004, Massachussetts Maratime AcademyDr. Shuhai Hou, 2005, Caterpillar Inc.Dr. Meizhong Dai, 2005, Convergent Science LLC.Dr. Shaoping Quan, 2005, High Performance Computing Centre, Singapore.Dr. Shiva Gopalakrishnan, 2009, Naval Postgraduate School.Dr. Kshitij Neroorkar, 2010, Post-doctoral study at UMass.Mr. Sandeep Menon, in progress, expected completion in 2010.

Recent Collaborators (excluding past students)Darin Knaus, Scott Phillips, Patrick Magari, Creare Inc., Vince McDonell, UC Irvine, Mark Bergander, Magnetic Development, S. Heister, W. Anderson, C. Corvalan, O. Campanella, C. Merkle, P. Sojka, S. Son, Purdue Univ. T. Meyer, Iowa State, P. Westmoreland, NCSU, C. Fotache, J. Lee, R. Madabushi, UTRC, H. Jasak, U. Zagreb, J. Hua, J. Lou, HPC Singapore

Cavitation - 14

Name: Sheila Patek

Armstrong Fund for Science Grant ProposalItemized Budget Request Form

Number of Years of Funding Requested: _2____(Include separate table for Year 2, if different.)

Expenses (Annual)

Personnel (including fringe benefits)FacultyStaff 5000Graduate Assistant 5000Other

HonorariaSuppliesCommunicationsMaterials 2000Travel 3000Software 5000EquipmentOther

Total 20,000(Do not include indirect costs.)

Brief Justification for Itemized Expenses:

Funds are requested for staff and graduate assistant personnel to continue their involvement in the project. Currently, graduate student Michael Rosario (NEAGEP fellow) is working on finite element analysis and materials testing of mantis shrimp appendages and his NEAGEP fellowship will run out this year. $5000 will help offset his summer salary. Elizabeth Murphy, a recent college undergraduate who is continuing her training in my laboratory as a lab manager before going to graduate school, has also been heavily involved in this project through kinematic analyses of mantis shrimp. $5000 will help offset the salary costs during the time she spends on this project.

The software used for data acquisition (Matlab, The Mathworks) and 3-D reconstruction of micro-CT scans (VG Studio Max) costs approximately $2500 per year in license costs. The $5000 dollars budgeted for software will allow us to continue using current versions of the software and make use of the technical support offered by the software manufacturers.

Travel and materials are needed to acquire mantis shrimp and maintain our existing mantis shrimp individuals in our aquarium facility. We will focus on collecting mantis shrimp in regional areas (Massachusetts, Florida and Mississippi) in order to minimize costs and maximize student involvement.

Cavitation - 15

Name: Yahya Modarres-Sadeghi

Armstrong Fund for Science Grant ProposalItemized Budget Request Form

Number of Years of Funding Requested: _2____(Include separate table for Year 2, if different.)

Expenses (Annual)

Personnel (including fringe benefits)FacultyStaffGraduate AssistantOther

HonorariaSuppliesCommunicationsMaterialsTravelSoftwareEquipmentOther

Total(Do not include indirect costs.)

Brief Justification for Itemized Expenses: