flare stars across the h-r diagram...flare stars across the h-r diagram luis balona south...

26
Flare stars across the H-R diagram Luis Balona South African Astronomical Observatory

Upload: others

Post on 10-May-2020

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Flare stars across the H-R diagram

Luis Balona

South African Astronomical Observatory

Main results of flare stars observed by Kepler

Flares occur in M, K, G, F and A stars (very few B starsobserved).

Flare stars may be common over the whole spectral range.

Flares tend to occur mostly in rapidly rotating stars.

Flare energies increase with increasing stellar radius.

No support for interacting magnetospheres in RS CVn binarymodel.

The Kepler spacecraft

Continuous photometry of over 100 000 in a broad opticalband (4000–9000 A).

Sampling time of 30 min (long-cadence mode) over 4 years.

Sampling time of 1 min (short-cadence mode) over a fewmonths.

The Kepler input catalogue

Prior to launch, the Kepler field was observed withmulticolour photometry.

For each star, the Teff and radius was derived by a modelingprocess.

Each star can therefore be approximately placed in the H-Rdiagram.

The data

Raw light curves of about 20 000 stars brighter than 12th magwere visually inspected.

Each star classified according to variability type and possibleflares noted.

Eliminated all “flares” which are simultaneous in differentstars.

Omitted all “flares” which did not have the characteristicimpulsive phase.

Avoided noisy stretches in the Kepler data.

Examples of flares: short- and long-cadence

0

5

10

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Time (hr)

10355856

0

5

10

159946017

0

2

4

Par

ts p

er t

ho

usa

nd

6786176

0

5 6545986

0

5

10

15 2557430

0

1

2

3

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Time (hr)

9902554

0.5

1.5

2.59778156

0

10

20

Par

ts p

er t

ho

usa

nd

7093428

-0.5

1.5

3.5

5.5 6185416

0

0.5

15870686

We use only short-cadence data.

H-R diagram of flare stars - short cadence

-1

0

1

2

4000 6000 8000 10000

log L

/L⊙

Teff

Flares occur even in hottest stars!

Flares in hot stars

Flares in A stars are unexpected.

This indicates that something is wrong with currentunderstanding.

This offers a perhaps important insight into the roles ofconvection and magnetism in generating the corona.

Current view on incidence of flare stars and presence of corona

Stars cooler than granulation boundary (Teff . 7500 K):

Convection → magnetic fields → spots → flares.

Convection/magnetic fields → corona → X-ray emission.

Stars hotter than granulation boundary (Teff & 7500 K):

No convection → no magnetic fields → no spots → no flares.

No convection/magnetic fields → no corona → no X-rayemission.

X-ray detections supports current view

X-ray ”hole” for A stars shows that A stars do not have coronae,as expected.

Flares in A stars

0

2

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Time (hr)

9216367

0

0.58703413

0

0.2

Pa

rts p

er

tho

usa

nd

8351193

0

2

45201872

0

2

4 5113797

0.5

1.5

2.5

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Time (hr)

11189959

0

0.5

1 10489286

0

0.5

1

Par

ts p

er t

ho

usa

nd

8686824

0

20

408142623

0

0.5

13974751

Flares in A stars are not due to a cool companion

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

log ∆

F/F

Teff

Flare on K companion only

Kepler would be unable to detect a flare on a K/M companion to anon-flaring A star.

Percentage of flare stars as a function of Teff

Type Teff N Nflare Percent

K+M 3000–5000 561 57 10.16

G 5000–6100 2018 99 4.91

F 6100–7600 1617 41 2.54

A 7600–10000 424 10 2.36

0

5

10

4000 6000 8000 10000

Per

cen

tag

e fl

are

star

s

Teff

Selection effects

A flare of a given energy will have a lower amplitude and moredifficult to detect on an A star than on a cool star.

Stellar flares in K/M dwarfs have A- or B-type continuum(Kowalski et al 2013). It is easier to detect such flares on coolstars than on hot stars.

Above selection effects tend to give decrease in flare star numbersfrom M → A, as observed. It is possible that the relative numberof A-type flare stars is not very different from the relative numberof K/M flare stars.

Flares seem to be a general property of all stars and not just cooldwarfs.

Rotational modulation in A stars

0

5

0 1 2 3 4 5

Frequency (d-1

)

4930889 0

1

2

Am

plit

ud

e (

mm

ag

)

4276821 0

3629496 0

0.05 2718321

0

0.01

0 1 2 3 4 5

Frequency (d-1

)

6776957 0

0.01

0.02 6224768 0

0.02

0.04 5371492 0

0.02

5122421

0

0.01

0.02

0 1 2 3 4 5

Frequency (d-1

)

9897254 0

0.01

9839575 0

0.005 8947729 0

5

10 7760680

Most Kepler A-stars show an isolated low-frequency peak.

Very often the harmonic can be detected.

Strongly suggests rotational modulation due to star spots.

Distribution of equatorial rotational velocities

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0 100 200 300 400

Fra

ctio

n o

f sta

rs

vrot (km s-1

)

Distribution of ve from Kepler photometry (histogram) agrees withdistribution of ve for field A stars (dashed curve).

Revised view on incidence of flare stars

A stars have spots and flares. A stars therefore have magneticfields (but no coronae).

It seems that the presence or absence of X-ray emission (coronae)is independent of the presence of a magnetic field.

On the other hand, X-ray emission stops when convection stops,therefore:

Convection may be necessary condition for the development ofa corona.

Magnetism may play a role in heating, but does not seem tobe primary cause of corona.

What are these flares?

Flares observed by Kepler are white-light flares. White-light solarflares are rare.

Stellar white-light flares may involve processes different fromnormal solar flares.

Flare stars rotate rapidly

0

0.1

0.2

0 10 20 30 40

Period (d)

F stars

0

0.05

0.1Fra

ctio

n

G stars

0

0.05

0.1 K-M stars

Rotation periods from Kepler light curves.

Why is rotation so fundamental in causing flares?

Rapid rotation → young star → activity.

BUT

Perhaps rotation itself plays a role in promoting flares. Perhapsdifferential rotation is efficient at twisting magnetic fields over verylarge distance scales.

Flare energy scales with stellar size

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

log E

log R/R⊙

Fractal nature of magnetic reconnection?

Why do larger stars have more energetic flares?

Energy in magnetic field is given by E = L3B

2

Larger stars → larger L → larger E for a given B .

Observed relation gives B ≈ 30G assuming L ∝ Rstar

Flare shapes

0

200

400

0 0.5 1

Time (hr)

12156549

0

50

100

0 0.5 1

Inte

nsity (

ppt)

8608490

0

50

100

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

4758595

0

5

10

15

-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Time (hr)

2557430

0

10

20

30

40

0 0.5 1 1.5

3441906

0

2

4

6

0 0.5 1 1.5

3128488

More than 30% of flares have bumps or change in decay rate.

Interacting magnetosphere model for RS CVn stars

Model for reconnection in magnetic field connecting componentsof RS CVn binary can be tested by looking at flaring rate as afunction of orbital phase.

Flares in eclipsing binaries

0

100

200

300

400

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

∆K

p (

ppt)

Phase

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

No. of flare

s

0

100

200

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

∆K

p (

ppt)

Phase

0

2

4

6

8

No. of flare

s

0

200

400

600

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

∆K

p (

ppt)

Phase

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

No. of flare

s

No obvious correlation of flaring rate with phase. Interactingmagnetoshere model not supported.

Conclusions

Flares common in M – A stars.

Flares, spots on A stars → convection necessary for a corona.

Rapid rotation promotes flares (differential rotation twisting?).

The larger the star, the more energetic the flare (B ≈ 30G).

Inter-star reconnection not supported for flares in closebinaries.

We need to understand solar white-light flares to understand stellarflares.