flow induced noise generation by partial cavities · flow induced noise generation by partial...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities
Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. CeccioUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor
USA2nd FLINOVIA Symposium
Penn-State University, State College, PA
Sponsor: Office of Naval ResearchProgram Manager: Dr. Ki-Han Kim
![Page 2: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation
Partial/Cloud cavitation: Significant source of noise, performance deterioration, and erosion
Mechanisms of transition, shedding, and their relationship to underlying flow
Void fraction flow field measurements for CFD code validations
![Page 3: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Cavitation Dynamics on NACA0015 Hydrofoil
SuperCavitation
Sheet Cavitation
L/c = 2/3TYPE 2
SheddingL/c < 2/3
TYPE 1SheddingL/c > 2/3
Cavitation type depends upon attack angle ( ) and cavitation number ( )
( )
( )
NACA 0015 Cavitation Map Arndt et al. (2000)
Physical mechanisms and associated acoustics
![Page 4: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Suction side surface pressure transducer data from Kjeldsen, Arndt & Effertz (2000) α = 7 degrees
Type 1
Type 2
Arndt et. al.- Cavitation Dynamics on NACA0015 Hydrofoil
What causes the abrupt change in dynamics?
![Page 5: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Flow loop: Michigan 9” water tunnel with reduced area test sectionNACA0015 Hydrofoil: AR = 1.5 and Chord = 50 mm Flow conditions: U0= 8 m/s, po = 20 – 120 kPa, = 0.4 - 4, Dissolved Oxygen ~ 50% SatMeasurements: Inflow quantities, acoustic pressure using hydrophone (B-K)Cavitation visualization: High-speed videosVoid fraction measurements: Time resolved X-ray densitometry
Present Study
![Page 6: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
X-ray Densitometry21 cm square test section
Test section area reduced to achieve lower attenuation through water
Mäkiharju, S.A., “The Dynamics of Ventilated Partical Cavities Over a Wide Range of Reynolds Numbers and Quantitative 2D X-ray Densitometry for Multiphase Flow”, 2012, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
![Page 7: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Cavitation Observation
High speedvideos from Top and side synchronized with hydrophone
Top
Side
Filmed at 7500 fps and played back at 15 fps
![Page 8: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Shock Collapse?
Shock Collapse
Reducing /2
Time
![Page 9: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Incipient Cavitation
X-ray measurements of incipient cavity (0-50%)
Side
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
Filmed at 7500 fps and played back at 15 fps
![Page 10: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: HS Video ( =10 )
High speedvideos from Top and side synchronized with hydrophone
Top
Side
Filmed at 7500 fps and played back at 15 fps
10°
5.8
Top
SideShedding is not spanwiseuniformLength is nearly constant
Re-entrant liquid flow induced shedding
![Page 11: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: X-ray ( =10 )X-ray measurements synchronized with hydrophone (0-100%)
Side
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
10°, 5.8
![Page 12: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: Spectral Contentσ0 / 2 = 5.8 = 10 degrees
Morse-Wavelet-transform
![Page 13: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Type 1 Shedding: HS Video ( =7 )
High speedvideos from Top and side synchronized with hydrophone
Top
Side
Filmed at 7500 fps and played back at 15 fps
7°, 4.2
Cycle BeginsCavity fillsMax length (L1)LE pinch offRoll-up and growth
Collapse and growth arrest (L2)
Top
Side Can lead to lift and drag changes
Length oscillates between cycles
Multi-modal
![Page 14: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Type 1 Shedding: HS Video ( =10 )
High speedvideos from Top and side synchronized with hydrophone
Filmed at 7500 fps and played back at 15 fps
10°, 4.1Top
Side
Cycle BeginsGrowth L1
Growth L2
Rollup and growthCollapse and arrest
# of steps can change
Length oscillates thrice between cycles
Multi-modal
![Page 15: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Type 1 Shedding: X-ray ( =7 )X-ray measurements synchronized with hydrophone (0-100%)
Side
7°, 4.2
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
Growth arrest due to cloud collapse observed
![Page 16: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Type 1 Shedding: X-ray ( =10 )X-ray measurements synchronized with hydrophone (0-100%)
Side
10°, 4.1
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
Cavitation at trailing edge can have an effect on spectral content
![Page 17: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
σ0 / 2 = 4.1 = 10 degrees
Type 1 Shedding: Spectral Content
Morse-Wavelet-transform
![Page 18: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Type 1 with Shocks: X-ray ( =10 )X-ray measurements synchronized with hydrophone (0-50%)
Side
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
10°, 3.0
Bubbly Shock
![Page 19: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Type 1 Shedding: Void FractionTop
Side
10°, 3.0
10°, 3.0 ′
′ ~0.3
~0.6
![Page 20: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
σ0 / 2 = 3.0 = 10 degrees
Type 1 with Shocks: Spectral Content
Morse-Wavelet-transform
![Page 21: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Shedding Dynamics: Flow ProcessesX-ray measurements synchronized with hydrophone (0-50%)
Side
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
10°, 3.0
![Page 22: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Shedding Dynamics: Flow ProcessesWavelet transform of Acoustic Signal
Side
10°, 3.0
![Page 23: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Shedding Dynamics: Flow ProcessesX-ray measurements (0-50%)
Side
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
10°, 3.0
3 step with shocks
1 step with shocks
Does cloud collapse cause cavitation near trailing edge?
![Page 24: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Top
Side
TS Organ Pipe Mode
StC= 6.7
StC = 0.42
StC = 0.14
StC = 0.28 = 7 degrees
Shedding Dynamics: Hydrophone ( =7 )
![Page 25: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Top
Side
TS Organ Pipe Mode
StC= 6.7
StC = 0.48
StC = 0.12
StC = 0.24
= 10 degrees
Shedding Dynamics: Hydrophone ( =10 )
StC = 0.36
![Page 26: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
L1
Side
L2Averaged void fraction
L3L4
Shedding Dynamics: Void Fraction
StC = 0.42
StC = 0.14
StC = 0.28
= 7 degrees
![Page 27: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
L1
Side
L2Averaged void fraction
L3L4
Shedding Dynamics: Void Fraction
StC = 0.48
StC = 0.12
StC = 0.24
= 10 degrees
![Page 28: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Conclusions
Side
Goal: To address the source of transition in cavity dynamics
1. Shed cloud collapse influences cavity growth and hence the cycle duration2. Cavity can attain different lengths in a given cycle depending upon the
nature of the shed cloud3. At lower cavitation numbers, propagating bubbly shocks are observed4. Secondary cavitation at the trailing edge is also observed
The line of demarcation between the processes can be thin, thus making the flow multi-modal.
![Page 29: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Thanks for your attention
![Page 30: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Cavitation
Occurs in liquids, when local pressure in close to vapor pressure
12
Partial cavitation: Occurs in separated flows attached to the object with stable cavity lengths
Cloud Cavitation: Characterized by cavity volumetric oscillations accompanied by shedding
![Page 31: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Arndt et al.- Cavitation Dynamics on NACA0015 Hydrofoil
NACA 0015 Cavitation Map
Arndt et al. (2000)TYPE 2
SheddingL/c < 2/3
TYPE 1SheddingL/c > 2/3
SuperCavitation
Sheet Cavitation
L/c = 2/3
Type 1:St ~ 0.15 independent of σ
Type 2:Re-entrant jet induced sheddingFrequency is ~ linear with σCavity length based St ~ 0.3
f – frequencyC- Chord (also LC)V- Velocity
Cavitation type depends uponattack angle ( ) and cavitation number ( )
![Page 32: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Ganesh et al. “Bubbly shock propagation as a mechanism for sheet-to-cloud transition of partial cavities”, JFM, Vol. 802, 2016 Shedding cavities can exhibit both re-entrant and bubbly shock induced
sheddingWhat are the mechanisms involved in NACA0015 hydrofoil cavitation?
Propagating Bubbly Shocks
![Page 33: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Cavity Length vs / 2a
7 degrees (■)10 degrees (●)Open symbols = X-ray Filled symbols =HSV
FSL theory for thin cavity
“negative compliance”
not observed
Cavity Length
![Page 34: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Four Modes of Cavity Shedding Identified
1. Incipient shedding2. Re-entrant flow, rear pinch off
(Type 2)3. Multi-step shedding with
shocks (Type 1)4. Shock induced shedding
(Intermittent Type 1)
It is important to note that the flow is multi-modal
Cavity Behavior
![Page 35: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Incipient Cavitation: Void FractionTop
Side
10°, 6.3
10°, 6.3 ′
~0.15
′ ~0.04
![Page 36: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: HS Video ( =7 )
High speedvideos from Top and side synchronized with hydrophone
Top
Side
Filmed at 7500 fps and played back at 15 fps
7°
5.8
Shedding is not spanwiseuniformLength is nearly constant
Re-entrant liquid flow induced shedding
![Page 37: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: X-ray ( =7 )X-ray measurements synchronized with hydrophone (0-100%)
Side
Filmed at 1000 fps and played back at 15 fps
7°, 5.8
![Page 38: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: Mean Void FractionTop
Side
7°, 5.8
10°, 5.8
~0.3
~0.3
![Page 39: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: RMS Void FractionTop
Side
7°, 5.8 ′
10°, 5.8 ′
′ ~0.10
′ ~0.08
![Page 40: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Type 2 Shedding: Spectral Content
σ0 / 2 = 5.8
0.40
0.28
0.14
= 10 degrees
![Page 41: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Type 1 Shedding: Mean Void FractionTop
Side
7°, 4.1
10°, 4.1
~0.4
~0.5
![Page 42: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Type 1 Shedding: RMS Void FractionTop
Side
7°, 4.2 ′
10°, 4.1 ′
′ ~0.20
′ ~0.20
![Page 43: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
σ0 / 2 = 4.1
0.45
0.30
0.15
= 10 degrees
Type 1 Shedding: Spectral Content
![Page 44: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
σ0 / 2 = 3.0
0.48
0.24
0.12
= 10 degrees
Type 2 with Shocks: Spectral Content
0.36
![Page 45: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
L1
Shedding Dynamics: Flow Processes
σ0 / 2 = 3.54
0.42
0.28
0.14
= 10 degrees
![Page 46: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Next Steps
Side
Goal: To address the source of transition in cavity dynamics
1. Measure unsteady pressures beneath cavity (Shock speed and Mach number)
2. High resolution void fraction measurements 3. Examine NACA and plano-convex hydrofoil?4. Measure unsteady boundary conditions
Larger Hydrofoil with 8.25 inch span.
![Page 47: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Bubbly Shock Speeds: t-s Diagrams
![Page 48: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Bubbly Shock Speeds
7 degrees (■)10 degrees (●)U
S/U
O
/ 2
![Page 49: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Void Fractions Pre- and Post-shock
7 degrees (■)10 degrees (●)
/ 2 / 2
~3 kPa
US2 (p2 p1)
L
(12 )(11)(1 2 )
![Page 50: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Top
Side
StC From the Void Fraction at L1
StC = 0.42
StC = 0.14
StC = 0.28
σ0 / 2 = 5.85σ0 / 2 = 4.83
σ0 / 2= 3.19
= 7 degrees
![Page 51: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Top
Side
StC From the Void Fraction at L2
StC = 0.42
StC = 0.14
StC = 0.28
σ0 / 2 = 5.85σ0 / 2 = 4.83
σ0 / 2= 3.19
= 7 degrees
![Page 52: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Top
Side
StC From the Void Fraction at L3
StC = 0.42
StC = 0.28
StC = 0.14
σ0 / 2 = 5.85 @ L2
σ0 / 2 = 4.83
σ0 / 2= 3.19
= 7 degrees
![Page 53: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Top
Side
StC From the Void Fraction at L4
StC = 0.42
StC = 0.28
StC = 0.14
σ0 / 2 = 5.85 @ L2
σ0 / 2 = 4.83
σ0 / 2= 3.19
= 7 degrees
![Page 54: Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities · Flow Induced Noise Generation By Partial Cavities Harish Ganesh, Juliana Wu and Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan, Ann Arbor](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040616/5f164c7bd6cfd60a1a365b27/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Top
Side
σ0 = 0.78
Acoustic Pressure From Hydrophone
Time Expanded
U0 = 8 m/s = 7 degrees