flying the a-380 the case for bigger aircraft
DESCRIPTION
Flying the A-380 The Case for Bigger Aircraft. MIT meets Lufthansa 2003. Agenda. The Challenge Key Issues and Concerns A-380 Technical Requirements and Operating Procedures Consequences Summary. The Challenge. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Flying the A-380The Case for Bigger Aircraft
MIT meets Lufthansa 2003
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Agenda
• The Challenge• Key Issues and Concerns• A-380 Technical Requirements and Operating
Procedures• Consequences• Summary
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
What consequences will Entry-Into-Service of the A380 have for an airline in terms of net management?
The Challenge
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Facts
Airbus A380
Length: 72.2m
Wing span: 79.8m
Height: 24.1m
Weight: 560000 kg
Passengers: 555
Boeing 747-400
Length: 70.7m
Wing span: 64.4m
Height: 19.4m
Weight: 396000 kg
Passengers: 390
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Flight Scenario
Planning
Departure:-Check In
-Gates-Aircraft Servicing
Flight:-Seats
-Distance-Cabin
-Crew Requirements
Arrival: -Airside Capacity
-Alternatives Maint.
Contingency Planning
Delays Security Rerouting Evacuation
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Network Planning
Challenges & Opportunities
• Production constraints– Limited airport infrastructure (primary & alternate)– Fleet size / aircraft rotation– Exchangeability of fleet– Maintenance facilities
• Market Constraints– Limited routes (frequency & high demand)– Competition in a limited market
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
• Strategic Considerations
– Slot efficiency– Improve airline image (launch customer)– Create a unique flying experience– Market development– Cost efficiency – reduce cost per seat
Network Planning
Challenges & Opportunities
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Network Structure Options
• Point-to-point• Network-to-Network (around the world)• Hub-and-spoke• Charter / non-network flying
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Network Structure Options
• Point-to-point• Network-to-Network (around the world)• Hub-and-spoke• Charter / non-network flying
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Network-to-Network
• “Alliance Airline”– Service provider – supports alliance partners– Airlines are customers– Link between several airline networks
• Route structure– Worldwide backbone connecting hubs– Regional networks feed A380 service– Global rotation
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Pros
• One worldwide Traffic Control Center• Higher utilization• Opportunity for minimum maintenance facilities• Use of existing service points (i.e. check-in)• Faster learning curve with A380 due to specialized
organization and dedicated staff• Risk sharing • Stronger position –
enhanced influence (clout)
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Cons
• Traffic rights / government interferences• Labor issues• Separation of image - corporate image identity• Different service networks / Cultural issues• Need long-term commitments / contracts• Dependence on alliance airlines• Each alliance member must
adapt their existing network to eliminate redundancy
• Inflexible network – reconstruction problems
• Allocation of costs and revenue
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Conclusion
• A380 brings a new dimension in terms of size, technology, infrastructure demands
• Market opportunities are limited• One airline may have difficulty operating the A380
efficiently alone • Alliance integration creates opportunities and reduces
risk
09 January, 2003 MIT meets Lufthansa, 2003
Thanks for your attention !