following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · dated: 1,2015...

68
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

•. ,'A-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW .YORK "

COUNTY OF NEW YORK . • ,

t--„Xs. •»<,' •»; 'A 1h>:4 'ÿ If* '

. ' ,;>.v - ,ÿ,;,.;NYCALInRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONÿ V.WA.S. Partÿ

: (Mpulton, f)......——-------——— ------..... x '

This Document Relates To: : Tridex No.: 190254-14

CAROL KENARY as Administratrix for the Estate ofHUGHV. KENARY hnd CAROL KENARY,Individually, • ; "...

Plaintiffs,

against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS,CO., et al.Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC;, by its attorneys

Harris Begch' • PLLGg". -hereby requests summary judgment ,in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice' Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,.;INC. with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to allco-defendants,' all claims and cross claims against

defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs..... - \

Dated: AaimHNew York, New York.

WEITZ Ja l.l XFMtKKG, P.C.Attorneys "for,Plaintiff1*1; r4700 Broadway,/. ; .:New York, NYH0OO3 vA .

(212) '558-5500 ' * - . '"

Robert A. Schaefer,lJKEsq.HARRIS BEACHPLLC

. Attorneys For DefendantArmstrong International, Inc.TQ0 WallStitetj 23rd Floor

: : New;York, NY 10005 -

<%x>%

. so ordered: l ?y/W/5~Hon. Peter Moulton, JTsTCT J

4U6o 72015NYS SOpREMi

part so£0URT . CIVli

ÿt' .j

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys
Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

..

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW'YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION" ::v-' •••"<?'

This Document Relates To:

PHILIP T. MCARDLE and KELLY MCARDLE,

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al.

Defendants.

X' - v, "•

:NYCAL .

';: 'LA:S. PartlpÿS"ÿÿ : (Moulton, f.)

~X: Index No.: 190256/2014

. n t •

: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY. JUDGMENT MOTIONAND: ORDER

r- X

WHEREFORE, defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., by its attorneys Harris

Beach PLLC, hereby, requ.ests ÿsumniary judgment in theyaboyeÿentilled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upoii notice to all- co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against,-T' V' ÿ.-•f ÿ

defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. be;and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated:New York, New York

Patti Burshtyn,Esq. V\'WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff '

700 BroadwayNew York, NYJ0003..(212)344-5461

SOORDERED,Hon1. Peter Moulton, LS;Cp---p

ÿRobert A. Schaefer, flrJBsq:HARRIS;BEACHPELCAttorneys.For DefendantArmstrong International, Inc100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

AUG; 0 7 2015

PART 50nys SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

,/km

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

. '-i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

AUGUSTO MANPARA, as Administrator for the Estate of.MICHELE MANDARa;:

Plaintiff(s),-against- Index No.: 190376/2014

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.,n/k/a RHONE POULENC AG COMPANY,n/k/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC.,

AMERICAN BILTRITE INC.,AMF BAKERY SYSTEMS,AZROCK INDUSTRIES,

A Division of DOMCO, INC.,BAKERS PERKINS,..INC.

Individually, and as Successor in interest toWerner Lehara, Inc., ,

BARI RESTAURANT & PIZZA EQUIPMENT,BLODGETT CORPORATION,

1

BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, ; ;

by its successor-in-interest, : ? TBORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., ÿ

CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC.,successor by merger toCBS CORPORATION, f/k/aWESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,

DAP, INC.GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,GEORGIA PACIFIC-LLC, '

IMO INDUSTRIES, INC.,. :KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY; INC., ' :

OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.,UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION,MARSAL & SONS, INC.,THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION,

Individually, and as Successor toMIDDLEBY MARSHALL INC.,

QCP, INC.,Individually, arid as Successor toBAKERS PRIDE OVEN COMPANY, INC,

AMF INC., INCORPORATED,

KÿA

yO

Defendants.

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

£ '

ÿ ,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, AMF AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, (hereinafter

"Automation Technologies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs

Complaint against Automation Technologies, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice of all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against Automation Technologies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs to either party.

.JOSEPH VWLDER, ESQ./npe/&/Linneball, LLPftorrje/for Defendant,MF Automation Technologies, LLC

RIS ROMANELLI, ESQiitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Drneys for Plaintiffsgusto Mandara, as

SKRIS ROMANELLI, ESQ.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsAugusto Mandara, asAdministrator for the Estate ofMichele Mandara700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1003Telephone No.: (212) 558-5500

403 Main at Court Street730 Brisbane BuildingBuffalo, New York 10203Telephone No.: (716) 853-6001

SO ORDERED:

HdfT Potor Moulten

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

2

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT.OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEAV YORK :

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Cynthia Magill, Individually-and as Administratrix to the NO OPPOSITIONEstate of Otis Corthell . , . SUMMARY

JUDGMENTMOTIONAND

> Order'----:---------------------'----------------X ' ':

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law. and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being-no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims arid .cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the 'same-are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs. - ,,

Dated: C lS ÿNewXorkÿNY v. * /

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 1902 14/09

Nick Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff ,

800 Third Avenue .•New York, NY 10022

'

Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.: 10557.00602

c

SO ORDERED,

V%,vo*

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

69 15230v.1

Sty.

SUPREME

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME.COURT OF THESTATEOF NEW YORK v AT > ACOUNTY OF NEW YORK A-"'. ÿ/ A .. - „IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION . I.A.S. Part 50(Moultori)

This Document Relates To: Index No: 190011/09

Joanne Dyer, Individually and as Proposed Executrix of theEstate of Sam Gull

NO OPPOSITION• SUMMARY

JUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant" CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice "Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' ÿ complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, thai upon notice to all co-defendants,-all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be "and the,.same are hereby dismissed wjth'prejudiceand without costs. . * ' ' . '

Dated: 7 / 11 )N.ew York,- NY

Nick Novack, Esq,.. , ÿ

j ;LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff.800 Third.Ayenue f t

New York, NY 10022vt"

SO ORDERED,

.6915242v.1

imia'Squitieri,- Esq.: WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,

- EDELMAN& DICKER LLP• .Attorney for Defendant

CARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017- File No.: 10557.00163

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

m 0)

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

*

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ÿ xThis Document Relates To:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190.406/10

Mark V. Slevin, as Executor of the Estate of Patrick T.Slevin • ...

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice.Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs', complaint against defendant CARRIER- CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, . . '

ORDERED-, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs. • . ,

Dated: SllMfNew York, NY

lick Novack, Esq. vLEVY KONIGSBERG LLP !Attorneys for Plaintiff , -800 Third AvenueNew York,' NY 10022 "

SO ORDERED, _Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

69 15253v.1

Virginia Squitieri, Esq.,WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP -Attorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42hd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No:: 10557.00916

V*'<13US

m%%

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

• ff' W'ÿ / ÿ V

SUPREME COURt OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK : ; ÿ /

INRE: NEW YORK CITY iASBESTOS LITIGATION J .

' '

ELIZABETHWAYBOURN, as Executrix for the Estateof JOHN WAYBOURN, and ELIZABETHWAYBOURN, Individually,

Plaintiffs,-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part ?0(MouJton,$j

Index No. 190110/08

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.,hereby requests summary

judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint,against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.,with prejudice inthis

action, and there being no pppositiort thereto, '

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants,: all claims and crossclaims against

defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,beandthe same are hereby dismissedwithprejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New-Yprk,New York

.Heather Janis Gaw,.Esq._ _Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries,Iiic.LewisBrisboisBisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21St Floor / -New York, New York 10005(212)232-1300 > . ' :

File No. 1863.16481 - .

SO ORDERED

ÿranlt 0/tijr, Esq.SW&MftCAftornÿror PlaintiffsElizabeth Waybourn, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Waybourn, and Elizabeth Waybourn,IndividuallyWeitz &Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,- New York 10003(212) 558-5500

. Hon. Peter Moulton%Jl3jlS %

4846-9064-8357.1

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

t:C

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'COUNTY OF NEW YORK

;ÿ ;?> V

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION-'

Index No.: 190002/09

IRWIN GOODMAN,

Plairitiff(s),

- against -

AURORA PUMP,COMPANY, et al„

ÿ Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP "COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment .'in the above-entitled case,,,pursuant to Civil Practice: Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing.plaintiff s complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, alT'claiihs and cross claims against ..Defendant, AuroraPumjb Company be and the same/are hereby dismissed with prejudice arid

without costs to either party. ÿ

Dated: 1,2015New YorkvrNew:York

Ainbtil Long, Esq. ' -

LEVY,PHILLIPS& KONIGSBERGj LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212)605-6200. r

SO ORDERED, - ..

Jordan jrf: BeltzÿEsq.SEG#L McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAH6nEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora;Purrip Cornpariy850 Third Avenue,,Suite 1100

New York, NY 10.022(212) 651-7500

vTvri. Peter H. Moulton

—_djpjts-.

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

t'ÿ

InrO

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK U '

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No,: 190101/2012

NICHOLAS C. TAMBAKIS,

- against -

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company without prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: .©«/HNew York, New York

,2015

Adam Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway •

New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

fordan D/Beltz, Esq.SEGAEMcCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500

ÿÿon. Peter H. MoultonQ//?//S

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

\f .V'.yyy-y ÿ"

"ÿÿyr&''-y -n- " y yuft"- ••

. 'V'V ' 'ÿ v y;«

u"- .'ÿ '

i ?

:•

.ÿÿÿÿ''

'.O-

• V'ÿ/y ••y-.yVy ...

yyy "--yy -tv-<vvW VV

"

,:•'ÿ••V' .-.

.ÿ .yy.- " = • W-.

,.,v .;yy4 -v.- v- \ • . . ÿ :. -y- •."

ÿÿ ÿ -. ÿ•/HV . .... .. • y.:yy,.y: »

.•ÿ• -• .>•-ÿÿ y-ÿy'yV; . .yyyr-yyy::;

itvÿy-Y

yy - - ÿ

wv -\ .

JE-.C E 1 Wv Ei

AUG 1 1 2015

rÿ\

JSegal IWcCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd

New York NY .ÿ

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

COUNTY OF NEW YORK----------------------—---L-------------------r--------------A-XINRE: NEW YORK CITY: .

':

ASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------—...................— .1—xThis Document Relates To: :

MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T SLEVIN,

NYCAL

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

Plaintiff, .. .• ...-. against - !

A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al„

Defendants:

Index No.: 190406/10

WHEREFORE,1 defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with, prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto, - ÿ

>

, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all- claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andWithout costs. .

Dated:

-4iyr-NictT5las~Noyack, Esq.LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 13th FloorNew York, New York 10022Counsel for PLAINTIFFS

SO ORDERED:

By: Adam L. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLP '

Attorneys for Defendant ÿ

FordMotor Company600 Third Avenue

'.New York, New York 10016Tf 212-593ÿ,6700F:.212-593,ÿ6970 °OUa- *

SAfON. PETER H. MOULTbN

ÿ -(OI391371.DOCX ) ÿÿLSUpK£toiR? s0

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN. DUNST8. DOUKAS. LLP- • | •

Attorneys at Law... . ÿÿ

48 Wajl Street;Suite> l[j.00New York, NY

SUPREME COURT OfvTRE STATE OF NEW YORK> ÿ

COUNTY OF NEW YOlv

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH AUKSTOLIS

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.'

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, $)

INDEX NO.: 02r107003

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

11 New York, New York

JASON RIEMER, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Go.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED:

DANA NORTI ICRAFT, ESQ,WEITZ & LUXENBURG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Joseph Aukstolis700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

CJLdtVÿVLWO

Honorabe Peter H. Mou ton

weBAU!> 1220K

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

HOAGLAND. L'ONGO,MORAfo.-.DUNST& DOU]<As, LLPAttorneys at.Law~\48 Wall Street-Suite ill00NewÿVork, ny-

supreme COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

JOSEPH AUKSTOLIS

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendant(s).

Index No.: 02-107003

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

Kristen M. Mehr, being duly sworn deposes and says I am an employee of Hoagland,

Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, the attorneys for Defendant* Kohler Co.

That on the ÿÿfdav of August, 2015 a copy of the within executed No Opposition

Summary Judgment Motion and Order was mailed, via first ciass to: Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.,

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 and one copy to the following

attorneys on the attached service list by first-class mail, postage prepaid.

I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if

any of the foregojng statements made by me are willfully,false, Iam subject to punishment:

SERVICE RIDER

See attached.

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant, Kohler Co:

KRISTEN M. MEHR

Sworn to before me thisAugust, 2015

is day of

PUBLIC

alesandra l.FARRELLNOTARYPUBLICCFNEWJERSEYMyCommission B$res 1Qf1Sÿ01g

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

AUKSTOLIS COUNSEL LIST

John J. Fanning, Esq.Cullen and Dykman, LLP44 Wall Street .New York, NY 10005

Suzanne Halbardier, Esq.Barry,McTieman& MooreTwo Rector Street, 14thFloorNew York, NY 10006

Jennifer Darger, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 E. 27th St, 12thFloorNew York, NY'10016-8942

Daniel McNamara, Esq.DeCicco, Gibbons & McNamara, P.C.232 MadisonAvenue, Room 1409New York, NY 10016 ~

MichaelA. Cerussi, Esq.Cerussi & SpringOne NorthBroadway, Suite 1011White Plains,NY 10601

William F.Mueller, Esq.Clemente Mueller222 Ridgedale AvePO Box 1296Morristown,NJ07962-1296

Thomas Maimone, Esq.Maimone & Associates, PLLC150HavenAvenuePort Washington, NY 11050

William J. Bradley, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038

Philip Goldstein, Esq.McGuireWoods, LLP1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10105-0106

LoringFenton, Esq.Greenberg Traurig, LLPMet LifeBuilding200 Park Avenue, 15thFl.New York, NY 10166

Abbie Fuchs, Esq.Harris Beach, LLP100 Wall Street,,23rdFloorNew York, NY 10005

DanielMoretti, Esq.Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford, PC1Gateway Center, Suite 400Newark,NJ07102-5311

Joseph G. Colao, Esq.Leader & Berkon, LLP630 Third Avenue, 17thFloorNew York, NY 10017

Scott R. Emery, Esq.LynchDaskalEmery,LLP264 West 40th StreetNew York, NY 10018

DonaldR. Pugliese, Esq.McDermott,Will & Emery340 MadisonAvenue, 17thFloorNew York, NY 10173-1922

Nancy McDonald, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP1300 Mount Kemble AvenuePO Box 2075Morristown,NJ07962-2075

Linda Yassky, Esq.SNR DentonUS, LLP1221 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10020-1089"

LisaM. Pascarella, Esq.Pascarella, DiVita, Lindenbaum &

Tomaszewski, PLLC2137 Route 35, Suite 290Holmdel,NJ07733

Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPOne Newark Center1085 RaymondBlvd., 16thFloor 4(/r\Newark,NJ07102-5311

/

%

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

ÿ

Page 2f *

Anna M. DiLonardo, Esq.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman &

Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville,NY 11747

James S. Montano, Esq.McCullough, Ginsberg, Montano & Partners122 East 42nd Street, Suite 3505New York, NY 10168

Linda J. Clark, Esq.Hiscock & Barclay, LLP - Albany80 State StreetAlbany, NY 12207 x-

Anthony J. Marino, Esq.Garrity, Graham,.Murphy, Garofalo & Flinn,

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350PO Box 438East Hanover,NJ07936

William E. Vita, Esq.Westerman Ball Ederer Miller & Scharfstein,

LLP ,

1201 RXR PlazaUniondale,NY 11556

Shehzad Hasan, Esq.Steptoe & Johnson1114Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.McGivney & Kluger,PC80 Broad Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004

John Ronca, Jr., Esq.Ronca, Hanley, Nolan& Zaremba, LLP29 NorthfieldAvenueSuite2West Orange, NJ07052-5358

Paul Scrudato, Esq.Schiff Hardin& Waite LLP666 FifthAvenue, Suite 1700 *

New York. NY 10103

EdwardWilbraham, Esq.Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005

Erik DiMarco, Esq.Wilson, Elser,Moskowitz, Edelman& Dicker150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017-5639

MichaelB. Sena, Esq.Herzfeld& Rubin, P.C. .125 Broad StNew York, NY 10004

KirstenKneis, Esq.K&LGates, LLP599 LexingtonAvenueNew York, NY 10022

Mr. LeonardF.LesserSimon Lesser355 LexingtonAvenue, 10thFloorNew York, NY 10017

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW.YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

LEONARD JOSEPH BIGAJ and LINDA BIGAI,

Plaintiffs,

A.C. and S., INC. et.al., including,MORSE-DIESELINTERNATIONAL, INC.,

, Defendants,

NYCAL. I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)

Index No. 115015/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as "Morse-Diesel

International, Inc."),hereby requests summary judgment in.theUbbverentitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs! complainLagainst defendant Morse Diesel,

Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,' ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc.,be and the. same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yfork, New York • . '

.,2015

eeteeo, Esq.fcmdaa

WEITJZ/& LUXENBERG,PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsLeonardJoseph BigajandLinda Bigaj700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED,

tnSr Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor. Defendant :

Morse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600 .New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

Dated:on. Peter H. Moulton

ms_

m

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part

-x

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 109974/06

ANDREW PAULNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

•x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Rosario Chetta, Esq,MALABY & BRA!Attorneysfor Defent

SuzanneAA Ratoliffe, Esq. ;ÿWEITZ &/LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys/for Plaintiffs)

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLOAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.Andrew Paul

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

150 Broadway, Suite 600 * .New York, New York 10038 Cq. ÿ6(212) 791-0285

SO ORDERED;tÿHon. Peter H. Moulton :

Dated:

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK .

INRE NEW YORK CITY, ASBESTOS LITIGATION

CAROL J. RIEGER;.Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of WILLIAM K.RIEGER,

NYCALI.A,S. Part 50(Moulton, lP)

-x .

Index No. 113324/01

Plaintiffs,

A.C. and S., INC.et al.;, including, MORSE DIESEL,INC.,

" ;:r•

' . '

Defendants,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREEOE£;-Defehdant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby.requesfs-surnmary judgment inthe

above-entitled caseÿpursuant to.Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,with prejudice, and.there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED1, tnat upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be;arid.|ne same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yqrkÿ.New York .'ty/D A 2015

Michael Fanelli, Esqÿ. •• - .

~

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs'CarolJ. Rieger, Individually andas Executrixfor the Estate of William K. Rieger700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500 rff ÿ

SO ORDERED, _:dÿdÿPeter H'. Moulton

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse.Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway,.Suite 600New York, Ne\y York 10038(212) 791-0285

•Dated:

... ÿ:$ ÿ

j' • > * "i.?4 • ff

I

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITiGATION- xThis Document Relates To:

NYCAL , ÿ

I.A.S. Part S*d(Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlor)—HON.PETERH.MOUJLTONIndexNo(s).: 190137-10

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

GENNARO AZZARONE, as Administrator ofthe Estate ofNICOLAAZZARONE, deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATIONPRODUCTLIABILITY TRUST, et al.,

Defendants.-...._x

WHEREFORE, defendant .CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, ' pursuant to Civil Practice- Law and' Rules' Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being noi .

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,,all claims and cross,claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the -same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: . &0\*5"

htrtaÿNovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG,LLPAttorneys for Plaintifffs).800 Third Avenue, 11 Floor,New York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

Kirstejf Alford Kneis, Esq.K&j/GATES LLP

forneys for DefendaniCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900 .

4(JGfNly

$0*01$

SO ORDERED, ;wg©

AUG 13 1015

ÿy-KleiivHeiller*RH.MOUETON

LÿsoPReÿsot COURT CIVIL

OhciTHON.PETERH

y°40ÿ

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF;NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -

INRE:NEW.YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION................--------—-—- ---x "

This Document Relates'To:

.CYNTHIA MAGILL, Individually and asAdministratrix to the Estate ofOTISCORTHELL,

Plaintiffs),ÿ &

ÿ; -against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTSCOMPANY, etal.',

NYCALI.A.S. Part £>£>

IndexNo(s):: 1902ls4-09N

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE; defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case,; -pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, .

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE GO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:ork, New Yor

H--Audrey m.-Raphael, Esq!LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaihtiffis)800 Third Avenue, 11ÿ FloorNew York, NY 10022(212)605-6200 .

SO ORDERED,

«

KirstenAlford Kneis, Esq.K&ybATES LLP.Attorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.

Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900

MainHntlrrHON.PETERH.MOULTON

m

AUS It,C°<%yC(c *015

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OE'NEW YORK •

INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION/------------—---—————- ——xThis Document Relates To:

CYNTHIA MAGILL,Individually and asAdministratrix to theEstate of OTISCORTHELL, \:?r

/Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS .COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part jKf S 6

loBr-Sliciiy ICluinHeiller)—PETERH.MOULTON

Index No(s).: 190214-09 .

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

---------------------........—— —- -xWHEREFORE; defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.

with prejudice, and there being'no opposition thereto, " .

ORDERED, that ,upon notice to all Co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE PUMPS SYSTEMS, INC. be, arid the same are hereby, dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. ; ••/•/'"

Dated:

Audrcy-Mv-Raphael,LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs)800 Third Avenue, 1PFloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

*/ ;

(—ilc- vtotAs

KirstenAlford Krieis, EscÿK&I/GATES LLP ,

Attorneys for DeferiÿfitÿNE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC

599 LexingtonAvenueNewYork,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED,-HOrt. ShettylQcinlicitlci--hon.peterh.moulton

WISow 0

coir

AUG t /

c°ÿryc 5

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF,NEW.YORK : YY T ' » .Y

INRE: NEW -YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ;

-xThis Document Relates To:

MILTON 0. KARLÿIndividually and asAdministrator of the Estate of IRWINGOODMAN, Y y

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

ABEX CORPORATION, et al„

"Defendants.

. NYCALI.A.S.Par

' Index No.: 190002-09

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissingjplaintiffs' complaint against.defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.

with prejudice, and there bemg no opposition thereto, .*

ORDERED, that uporr notice to all co-defendants; all. claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with

prejudice and without' costs.

Dated:

—Amber Lung, Esq.LEVY KON1GSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaiiit iff(s) V. \

800 Third Avenue,. 1-1 FloorNew York, NY 10022 .

(21.2) 605-620.0 .Y ' Y' Y .

ÿ \ cjAoi_A*> ÿ

Kirste/Alford Kneis, EsK&I/GATES LLP ÿ'

Attorneys for-DefendvNE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.

599 Lexington Avenue . - .•

New York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED,VUou. Peter Mbulto'm •

hon.peterh.moultom AUG J 32015

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK . . .

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION......i—.......--- --———- xThis Document RelatesTo:

JOANNE DYER,Individually and as ProposedExecutrix of the Estate of SAM GULL,

Plaintiff(s),

-against- •

AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL.I.A.S. Part>0' cÿoCHon. Shcrrv Klein Hoitlor) —-HON.petMh-moWonIndex No(s).: 190011-09

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE,: defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against ÿdefendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and them being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that updn notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed,with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

atrick TimmincfEsq,LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)800 Third Avenue,J 1th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200|OlcÿV-Aov-A'S ÿ-ÿ£>

HcAjLlAKirsteh Alford Kneis,K&l/GATES LLPAttorneys for Defen€ant

vNE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900,

SO ORDERED,TTon Sherry K.lr;" •

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

sOiDWibAUG 13 2015

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Co, ÿ6°u"ryc,- %

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- — —- x

This Document Relates To:

JUDITH KALLESTENOAKLEY, Individuallyand as Administrator of the Estate of SPENCEROAKLEY,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

ANCHOR PACKINGCOMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S.Partÿ <T2)(Hon. Sherry KleinIloitlor-)HON.PETERH.MOULTONIndexNo(s).: 190131-09

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO: be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: 7ÿ 3-2015-

Brendan J. TuHyrEsqrLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintifffs)800 Third Avenue, 11 FloorNew York, NY 10022(212)605-6200 ;

KirstenAlford Kneis, EsiK&LjGATES LLPAttorneys for Defend;CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

coufo

<Hry •%AOS 1i

SO ORDERED,. -Shnrry Klein Heitler.

HmPETERH.MOULTON

vf/j/ts KIEOEIIVEDAUG 13 2015

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

/C£

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '.V

INRE: NEW YORK-CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- ---—. ...."XThis DocumentRelates To: : .

JUDITH KALLESTENOAKLEY, Individually .;

and as Administrator of the Estate of SPENCER : NYCALOAKLEY,

\; Plaintiff(s),

-against-

ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY; et al.,

Defendants.

I.A.S.Partÿ(Hon. SheayiCIeia Ileiliei)

Index No(s).; 190.131-09

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Ldw and Rules Section..

3212, dismissing plaintiffs'-complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC."J r

' '

' , - "

with prejudice, and there being.no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.- • '* 7

Datedi.

lan.J. Tully, EsqrLEVY KONIGSBERG,LLPAttorneys for Plaintifffs)800 Third Avenvie, li® FloorNew York,<NY 10022' —(212)605-6200

SO ORDERED, .

%

KirstenAlford Kneis,K&I/GATES LLPAttorneys for DefeÿSantCRANEPUMPS SYSTEMS, 14 pm?599 Lexington Avenue 'VC)ÿ ®New York, NY 10022-6030 ,ÿK'sn(212)536-3900 ÿ

ÿ. Shorry KleinHeitler .

HON.PETERH.MOULTONV Vj,'.-

AUG 13 2015

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK - >

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION———.......—-—----—---------— X

This Document Relates To:

ESTHER SHEMBERG, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate ofZEV SHEMBERG,'

C Plaintiff(s),

ÿ -againstv

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTSCOMPANY, et al.,

'Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part# S#(H«n. Shuiy KleinHeiLlei)HON.PBTJERH.MOULTONIndex No(s): 190221-10

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- .......7—- - X

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO- hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to' Civil Practice Lav/ 'and Rules Section 3212; dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with, prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE.CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismisseO'with prejudice and without costs!'

Dated: 3cX5~/York

tfduuJl-BfendaTrJTTulTyrEsqr —ÿ

LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)800 Third Avenue; .! 1th FloorNew York, NY 10022 "

(2 12) 605-6200

SO ORDERED,_

Kirsten/AlfordKneis, EsqK&LjGATES LLPAttorneys for DefendjtfftClUNECp. '

599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900.

Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlcr -HON.PETERH.MOULTON

ow k "IC$

SUPREME COURT

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF-THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK •

;

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-—.......--7-.....——7—7-.-.....--- xThis Document Relates To: .

'

NYCAL *I.A.S. PartÿT(Hoiii Sharry KINÿ

HON.PETERH.MOULTONIndex No(s).-: 190406-10-

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T'.SLEVIN,

. : Plaintiffs),

ÿ -against-

A. W. CHESTERTON CO., INC.,et al, .

Defendants.- —- — x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf of named Defendants CRANE CO.

and DEMING PUMPS (hereinafter "CRANE CO."), hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.' and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with /prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants/ all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

ffilca V. Cesare>7-Es€LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP .

Attorneys for Plaintiffs)800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

ÿ(-VoL-Ars

SOORDERED,

XAuAKirsten Alford.Kneis,

K&JL GATES LLPAttorneys for DefepCRANE CO. CQ 4(Jq599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030'(212) 536-3900

Hon Sh"|J/3//S

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

ÿmecourt

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

,X.ÿÿ ;'v •

p X; • .

NYCAt v

I.A.S. Partÿ(Hdn.Shesry Klein Ilcitlcr)wQN.PETERH.MOULTONIndex No(s).: 190406-10

:

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

U.A

SUPREME COURT OF.THE STATE OF NEW YORK • , X -X .COUNTY OF NEW YORK . .

. ;'*Xÿ

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This DocumentRelates To: *;

MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN, "X

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A. W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,

' Defendants.———................— . X * ' *

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.

with prejudice, arid there being no opposition thereto, ÿ '

ORDERED, that upon notice to all- co-defendants, all claims, ahd cross" claims against

defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC..be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: nwsH- ÿ.2015"

: p< .>•.CSclIUj C/oLj:"—

LEVY KON1GSBERG, LLP .

Attorneys for Plairitiff(s)800 Third Avenue, 1ll- Floor.'New York, NY 10022(212)605-6200

Kirston Alford KneisK&Z GATES LLPAjiwrneys for DeferiOantCRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.599 Lexington Avenue. ' ÿ6 iNew York, NY 10022-6030 UNry $ 2/)tf(312) 536.3900 ÿ U'*

SO ORDERED, ., ÿb*ÿ-Shouy Klein Hciljer—tÿfeERaMOUlTON

$ 131/5

.... x, .

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -V "

INRE: NEW YORK,CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

EVELYNB. SMITH, Individually and asPersonal Representative of the Estate ofJAMES RICHARD SMITH,

Plaintiff(s), .

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON CO, INC.,et al,

Defendants. »:

NYCALI.A.S.Partÿ S&(Hon. Sherry KleinHoitlHON.PETERH.MOULIndex No(s).: 190115-10

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case,, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs', complaint against ' defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, arid there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. bej arid the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: 7rk.New York

KiamerUEsqLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)800 Third Avenue, IT1 FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) '605-6200 •?.

Alford Kneis,K&L GATES LLP

ttorneys for DefÿCrane co.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

/

SO ORDERED,jÿirGlieny Klein Heltler

HON.PBTERH.MOULTON

t/a/zs~

j>n

4ÿÿ, 0/Saw

SUPREME COURT

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK /

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.....- xThis Document Relates To:

EVELYNB. SMITH, Individually and asPersonal Representative of the Estate ofJAMES RICHARD SMITH;

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC.,et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Partner'(Hon. Gliciiy Klein,

HON.!Index No(s).: 190115-10

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, . *

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE PUMPS, & SYSTEMS, INC. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: u#i "=)2015"

James M. Kramer, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffls)800 Third Avenue, 11' FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200 ;

AKirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for Defenda:CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, I££.599 LexingtonAvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900

SO ORDERED,Sherry KleinHettlerT-

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

f/ÿj?//SNYS

sOEDWiAUG 1-3 2015

PART 50SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

ÿif..;.-.--''' a/ -7;%-ÿ"

• - I-V :fiS' "-.ÿV ÿ:ÿ

;F:> i;

SUPREME COURT.OF THE STATE OFNEW YORK V "" • *COUNTY OFNEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK.CITYasbestos Litigation

•-xV;: NYCAL

KEVINBARRETT and IRENE BARRETT,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

0WENS-ILLINOIS INC.,et al.,

Defendants.

-X: . IndexNos.: 109675/99: 111053/98

113279/97: 103674/97

: NO OPPOSITION: SUMMARY JUDGMENT: MOTION AM>()ltl)KH

: Hon:Peter H. Moulton,: IAS Part 50

- - ........----— X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs'; complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that/upon notice to all co-defendants,; all claims and cross-claims

against The GoodyearTire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

WEITZ.& LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Phaii Alvarado, Esq:'ÿ/2

700'Broadway (

New York, New York.10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED:

LYNCHDASKALEMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire& Rubber Company

Lawrence Lee, E

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 710-0057 V

Ion. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C;

..m

AUG 13/015

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

r'\ :=V-_ ÿ

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNfY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190406/10.

Mark V. Slevin, as Executor of the Estate of Patrick T.Slev in

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER '

WHEREFORE, defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURYTRUST, AS SUCCESSOR TO FELT PRODUCTS MFG CO. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs', complaint against: defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOSPERSONAL INJURY TRUST, AS SUCCESSOR TO FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO. withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .

ORDERED, that upon ,notice to all co-defendants', all claims and cross claims againstdefendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST, ASSUCCESSOR TO FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO., be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs. '

Dated:York, NY

lick Novack, Esq. . .

LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022

Armand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantFEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOSPERSONAL INJURY TRUST,SUCCESSOR TO FELTPRODUCTS MFG. CO.150 East 42nd Str

, New'York, NYFile No.:.11120,

SO ORDERED,

6915450v.l

on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK .

COUNTY OF NEW YORK /ÿ/<• .f'r-

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY VASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCAL- 'I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190103/10

Peter Sciarabba, as Executor of the Estate of KathleenRoslyn Sciarabba.,r .

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant MCCORD CORPORATION hereby requests . summaryjudgment in the 'above-entitled case, pursuant to Civii Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant MCCORD CORPORATION with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto, ÿ '

. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant MCCORD CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without cdsts: ÿ

Dated: %/1 / ISNew York, NY •

lick Novack,EsqVLEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue . \New York, NY/10022 . '

SO ORDERED• y/C-_.ÿHoh:;Petpr,H. Moulton, J.S.C;

6915453v.l

;u; . .

Armand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for Defendant .AccordCorporation150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 06507.01342

?// $//s

c°oJ0e'iW.

SUPREME

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

' •' 1 ' -' ÿ

' ' '•' '•"ÿ'• ÿ "jZ-T'T

SUPREME GOyRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF1NEW YORK

INRE NEW Y6RK .CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A S, Parted"5"0

This Document Relates.To: Index No: 190392/12

John W, Adler and Elaine Adler

x

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, ' defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONALINJURY TRUST, as successor to FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO. (FEL-PRO),hereby requestÿ summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules • Section 321*2, dismissing plaintiffs'; complaint against defendantFEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST, as successor toFELT,PRODUCTS MFG. CO.,,with prejudice, and'there-being no opppsition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST,as successor to FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO., be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice.and without costs.

Dated: V / l& j / $

Amber R. Long, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorney for Plaintiff •

800 Third Avenue ÿ "

New York, NY 10022

so

6622396v.1

<c- v/ -Heth-Shcrry K. IIcTtitr'

Arniand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER. MOSKOWITZ,edelman& Dicker llpAttorneyfor.DefendantFederaLMogul Asbestos PersonalInjury Trust, as successor to FelÿsProducts Mfg. Go.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10.0 17FileNo. 11120.00133

m/s

.MOULTON

- • ;

** .

*-:l . -/v *. <ÿ -> :-vr

-'y *ÿ*. \ 'I

m

SUPREME COURT

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

3. ÿ:ÿ

'My.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEty..YQRK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCAL.I.A.S,Part(Heitjer, J.)

Index No: 190392/12

John W;Adler and Elaine AdlerNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant .FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONALINJURY TRUST, as successor to the VELLUMOID DIVISION OF FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitledcase, pursuant to, Civil Practice- Law and Rules Section 3212,. dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURYTRUST, as successor to the VELLUMOID DIVISION OF FEDERAL-MOGULCORPORATION, with prejudice, and there being no oppo'sition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST,as successor, to the VELLUMOID DIVISION OF FEDERAL-MOGULCORPORATION, be and, the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts. '

/

Dated:

Amber-LEVY KONiGSBERG LL?Attorney for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022

SO ORDERED, .

6622401v.l . ;

WILSON, ELSER. MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN <&OlCKER LLPAttorney for DefendantFederal-Mogul Asbestos PersonalInjury Trust, as successor to theVeiiumoid Division of Federal-Mogul Gdrporation150 fiasf42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File'Noi11121.00026

. rT-Iyii*.iSlim$Lk:.' HelUt;i,:

HONiPCTERMMOULTON

- %..-V

m

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

' :>r. ~ - --v., -;: v;v. .. >'.?ÿ; * _' .i

:f ' "•

'V -v

.SUPREME COURT OF THE.STATE OF.NEW YORK-COUNTY OF NEW YORK

"

INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ÿx

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190079/15

Frank GondarNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant TEXACO INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaintagainst defendant TEXACO INC.,with prejudice, and there beingmo opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that tipon hoticetd all co-defendants, all claims arid cross claims against defendantTEXACO INC.,Jbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ii.N rk,NY - ' '

Jordan FoBELLUCAttorneys546 FifthNew Yorl<

• Jx, LLPlaintiff

hue, 4th FloorY j 0036 : ;

•.w

SO ORDERED, .

Uxm. Peter.I-I. Moulton

6862359v. 1

Armand'Khlfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKQWITZ,EDELMAN & .DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantTrXACO INC. c ,

loO East 42nd StreetNew.York, NY 10017: • .FileNot: 01042.00353

AUG 13Of

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ' "

INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Frank Gondars

. *ÿ "

x ,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moultbn)

Index No: 190079/15

NO OPPOSITION,SUMMARY

JUDGMENTMOTIONANDOrder

WHEREFORE, defendant NEW YORKERBOILER COMPANY, INC.,hereby requestssummary judgment in the'above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NEW YORKER BOILER COMPANY, INC.,withprejudice, and there being no opppsitibn.thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to.all co-defendants; all claims and cross claims against defendantNEW YORKER BOILER COMPANY, INCi, be and the same are hcreby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: UjÿV

Jordan FoxBELLUCKl #FQX,Attorneys f q/Plaintiff;!;.546 FifthAve'nue,:4th,'FlobrNew York, NY 10036 -

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

686235 lv.l

ÿ Afrhand Kalfayan, Esq.. WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,

EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney.for.DefendantNEW YORKER BOILERCOMPANY, INC.

* 150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 12545.00095

%.

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

J.t- 4: 'V!.,".>.V.Y !.:...

SUPREME COURT OF THE-STATE OF NEW YORK • •/

COUNTY OF NEW YORK' " ;;' v

INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190079/15

Frank Gondar

XV H"'* .. :>b-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to,Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, with prejudice,' and there being noopposition thereto, . ;•

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and.cross claims against defendantCARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed.with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

Jordan FoxBELLUCKAttorneys fo546 FifthAvNew York:

New YJbr

036;. Y

,vU

2:2-

<2.Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSICOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttdmey,for.Defendant ,CARRIER CORPORATION450 East:42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 10557.01798

SO ORDEREDHon. Pe'ter IT Moulton

6862352V. 1

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

t. '

COUNTY OF NEW YORK- - - - x

INRENEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----... .......This Document Relates To:

X

NYCALI.A.S.Rait 50(Moulton)

Index No: 19014ÿ/2015

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NQ OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

AERCO INTERNATIONALINC.,ct al.,

Defendants.

dismissing plaintiffs; complaint against defendant THE BOEING'COMPANY,without

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants;al| claims:and cross claims againstdefendant THE B.OEING COMPANY,be and the same.are hereby,dismissed without prejudiceandwithout costs. .

Dated: New York, New Yorkslew-York, New '

9\ izjm

Simmons Hanly Conroy LLCAttorneys for.Plaintiff112 Madison Avenue1New York, New York 10016-7416

SO ORDERED; ;

4, ELSER, MOS1COWITZ,. EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantTHE BOEING COMPANY1'50 East 42lul Street a

New York, New York lOOCKOur FileNo.07040.00045

ON. PETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.V3//b

6932689V.1 '3 20(5

crva ÿ

Page 45: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF,NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE; NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION f

DON P. DONOVANand KATHLEENDONOVAN, ÿ £;Plaintiffs,

. -against-

ABB, INC., et ah,

INDEX NO. 190046-15

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND

Imÿ ORDER£§

Defendants, ÿ

ÿ 'WHEREFORE, defendant"Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitledicase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiff s complaint against defendant NelesUamesbury; Inc. with prejudice, and-there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby - >

ORDERED, that upon notice ,to all co-defendants, all claims, and cross-claims against

defendant Neles-Jamcsbury, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

For purposes of this order, .facsimile and PDF signatures shall be deemed binding as

originals. ." _ V .

Dated: New York, New YorkAugust /o? ,2015

Patti BurshtynWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500Attorneysfor PlaintiffsDonP. Donovan andKathleenDonovan

Thuy 'DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPIT77 Avenue of the Americas, 41st FloorNew York, New-York 10036(212)248-3140'. .

Attorneysfor DefendantNeles-Jamesbury, Inc. .

SO ORDERED:yfldin. Peter H.Moulton

/

W

' X

Page 46: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ROBERT W. OPEL,

Plaintiffs,-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190081-15

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all .claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

JAMS LAWAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor-New York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122

SO ORDERED,

Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&yGATES LLPAtjprneys for Defendant

VNE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900

Hon. Peter H.Moultonÿ *//?//•'S*

c°0a. tl

Y

8W13 2015

"Is ehe'SCOURT .

Page 47: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

WILLIAM PAGANO, as Administrator for theEstate of ANN PAGANO, and WILLIAMPAGANO, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,. Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190414/2013

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA,- INC., formerly known as

Square D Company, (hereinafter "SQUARE D") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing. A ' '

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant SQUARE D with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant SQUARE D be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:- New

Sjuzanne Rijtcliffe, Esq.WEITZ fe/uXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 1.0003 -

(212) 558-5500" ; -v i

SO ORDERED,!

Alford Kneis, Esq.GATES LLP

ttorneys for DefendantSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC(f/k/a SQUARE D COMPANY) '599 Lexington Avenue Al/nNew York, NY 10022-6030 *(212) 536-3900

Ion. Peter H;Moulton

Page 48: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

A

.»•- '• r'j"

ÿ i1

IRECF'VÿD

AUG 0 4 2015

KatGATES

t

Page 49: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

V

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION—---------------....---------------ÿ- . >This Document Relates To:

IRA RITZ and AUDREY RITZ,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

tfobQa/ao/yIndex No.:W&aMm*

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

- xrWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:New York ew York

ÿ Frnnlf Octi?, prÿgLWEITZ & LUXEAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

fab\jAKimenAfford Kneis, Esq.

GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

'Efon. Peter H. Moulton

fir

Page 50: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

AUG 0 4 2015.

K&lGaTES

Page 51: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

_, . •'-• •• ' V- •' • > ,

SUPREME COURT 01; THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK , T . ' '

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------r-—----—... -V---.- X.

This.Document Relates.To::

NYCAL-I.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H.Moulton)

Index No: 190351-13

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

JOSEPH SOLAZZO III,as Administrator for theEstateof JOSEPH SOLAZZO,

Plaintiff(s),

-against- -

AIR & LIQUID-SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor-by-merger to.BUFFALO PUMPS,INC., et al, V

Defendants. •

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint, against defendant CRANE CO. with- prejudice, and, there being no

opposition thereto,• r

> ÿ

'•

' ' -• • •• '

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,' all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: DNew York, New.York - . . . '

Fidillv M. Qniii,Euf, £&WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plairitiff(s)700 Broadway (, . .

New York,'NY I0003(212) 558-5500 ÿÿ AAA •

'

Alford Kneis, Esq.K&€ GATES(LLPraorneys for Defendant

'CRANE CO.599 Lexirigton AvenueNew York,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900 ..

V"SO ORDERED, V? $

"v Hon. Peter H. Moulton. -1.L . • ÿ

W>s m

Page 52: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

Ta -v; x

V v ' " ; - 'ÿ

. . % «ÿ'. .. : '?*ÿ"' 'ÿÿ

v'. • •

'

/.)

\' ' ,

L

RECEIVEDAUG. 0 4 2015

'K&L GATES J

Page 53: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

?

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

: NYCAL: I.A.S. Part 50

(Moulton,x .: Index No.: 190277/14

SUSAN COFFIN TROISE as Executrix for the Estate ofMARCO E. TROISE and SUSAN COFFIN TROISE, asSpouse,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. as successor-in-interest

to Wilputte Coke Oven Division of Allied Chemical Corporation ("HONEYWELL/WILPUTTE") by

its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant HONEYWELL/WILPUTTE with prejudice only (this Order does not apply to Honeywell

Int'l Inc. s/h/a successor to Allied Signal/Bendix Corp.), and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Honeywell/Wilputte,and the same are hereby dismissed With.prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

1:ÿ cc<ycts4 /2'2°15

Mark Bibro; Esq. ; ;

THE EARLY LAW FIRM,LLC . .

Attorneys.for Plaintiffs;360 LexingtonAvenue, 20th Floor .New York, NY 10017(212)986-2233 J

Robert A. Schaefer, JrÿEsq.HARRIS BEACHPLLCAtlornJysfor*Defendants .

HqnefYiefffitijÿMoftdlfhcfdÿ-:successor-in-interest toWilputte CokeOven Division ofAlliedChemical Corforation, "

100 Wall-Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005 .

(212)687-0100

SO ORDERED,<ÿHon ÿeteTELMoulton, J.S.C.

>li.?/u//S .• A 'ÿ

***ÿ*» ft ? *

AUG 13 2015i

•vwHS*PART 50

NYS'SUPREME COURT CIVIL

M

Page 54: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK . , ; ©ÿ

InRe: NEW YORK C1TYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190054/15

WALLACE HANKIN,

- against -

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants..

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE,. Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to' Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump.Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, ; ..

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all chums and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are.hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either-party. .' / ...Dated: 31: 2015

New York, New York

ISuzanne" Ratcliffe, Esq; '

WEIIK/fc LUXENBERG,P C.Attorneys,for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500'

SO ORDERED

KatrinaH. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys- for DefendantAurora Pump Company q 4(jr*850 Third Avenueÿ Suite 1100 ÿ

New York, NY- 10022

A-

: Hon. Peter H. Moulton

(212) 651.-7500- ; „ .

Sjn//s?0's

©

supreme

Page 55: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

'i-l ÿ

* .•* • J • .

. :.*-t ÿÿ -ÿ .

ÿ". 7!'v

w

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK f -

IN RE NEW YORK CITY .ASBESTOS LITIGATION

WALLACE S. HANKIN and HELEN HANKIN,

NYCAL

Index No. 190054-2015

-against;Plaintiffs,

ÿ VI. .

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al. includingROPER PUMP COMPANY,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AS AGAINST DEFENDANTroper technologies, inc.

.!v-Vj -

'Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (sued herein as "Roper Pump Company")

hereby requests,summary judgment in the •,aboYere'otitle<d;case,>Rursua'nt to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., with prejudice, and

there being no opposition.thereto, *7, - :

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,' all/claimsand cross claims against defendant

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,',New.York

7/w/Suzanne Ratcliffe,.Esq.

'Weitz & u4xenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

: • V,

StepherTNuVakidis,.Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC'Attorneysfor RoperTechnologies, Inc.150'Broadway, Suite 600New YoVk, NY 10038 .

c0/ %

SO ORDERED, __ Dated:vf Hon. Peter H. Moulton

%Ny,

hS(J/

tots

'l&j :rfc

Page 56: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

DON P. DONOVAN and KATHLEEN DONOVAN,

V Plaintiffs,-against-

ABB, INC. et al. includingROPER PUMP COMPANY,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No. 190046-2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT ASAGAINST DEFENDANT% ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

WHEREFORE/.dÿfenÿhtRÿPEÿ.TECHNOLOGIES,' INC. (sued herein as "Roper Pump Company")

hereby requests su'mfnaÿ.jiiq|me)ife'ih the above-e'ntitlecl. case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules-

Section 3212,dismissing;:plaintiffs';fcomplaint against ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., with prejudice, and

there being no opposition;tjÿ

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,.be and'the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewlYork, Nefw,York. ;

Patti Burshtyn; Esq. ÿ; -

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.GAttorneysfor Plaintiffs' ' ÿ

700 Broadway '

New York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED.: ÿ H-, ' v ÿ on:„Peter H.Mou11on....... ...

StepheirHÿeVakidis, Esq.'Malaby & Bradley, LLCAttorneysfor Roper Technologies, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038 . Aug

c°<%v„ '%>s,

Dated:

O

Page 57: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NICHOLAS SEWAK,.,

Plaintiff,

' -againstr

ARVINMERITOR; INC. Indiviciually and as Successor in interest to theFormerAutomotiveProductsSegmehfof Rockwell Internationaletal. including ROPER POMP CO.,

NYCAL

Index No. 190491-2013

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTAS AGAINST DEFENDANT

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Defendants.X.;

'WHERE!FORE?deferid'ant ROPER-TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (sued hereinas "ROPER PUMPCO.") hereby requests

summary judgment, in the aboveTentitlÿed case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaintÿagainst:ROPEFt TECHNOLOGIES, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant ROPER

TECHNOLOGIES/ |NC„ be and,the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, I work . • .

MichaeljCOhan,, Esqÿÿ't ,\.v .£:,NapbliBernÿRipkaShkolnjk&Associates.LLRAttorneysfpcPldiniiffs.:.350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413" C • ÿ

New York, New York 10118.

' StepherHlova'kiflis. Esq.':Malab.y & Br.adley, LLCAttorneysfor Roper Technologies, Inc.150 Broadway,'Suite 600New York, NY 10038

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H". MOult'on

fed: Mls m

AUG 14 2015

)V„'

Page 58: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -C ,

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -n

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IRA RITZ and AUDREY RITZ,

Plaintiffs,

A.O. SMITH WALTER;PRODUCTS'CO. et al.,including, MORSE DIESEL, INC., . .

Defendants,

-x

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,f?)

Index No. 190022/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe

above-entitled.case, pursuant to CiviLPractice Law and Rules Section 3212j;dismissing plaintiffs' ,

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and'there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the sariie are hereby dismissed with prejudice'and without costs.

Dated: New Yqjk, NewYork :

E/t° U, 2015

Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUNENBERGi PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsL . , -IraRitz andAudrey Ritz .

700 BroadwayNew York, New York; 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,-, ;

Ion. Peter;H. Moulton

%

Rosario'Chetta, Esq. j, TMALABY <& BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel,:Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 1.0038(212) 791-0285

ated: sm

m

AUG 14 2015

Page 59: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF,THE STATE OF NEW YORK .COUNTY OF NEW;YORK Y . ;

'

INRENEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

RAYMOND FLOOD andCARLEEN FLOOD, .

Plaintiffs," -v.-

NYCALI.A. S.,Part 50' '

(Moulton,'P.)

Index No. 190147/2015

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

AERCO INTERNATIONALINC., et al. , . \ .

• Defendant(s). -A Y ' , .-NY: .-:---:-:—=—ÿ---. , —x • ,-L '

WHEREFORE, defendants J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING POOL SERVICE AND

MAINTENANCE, INC. and J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING POOL'S, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled,ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and:Rules.Section 3212, dismissing'

plaintiffs',complaint against de'fendants J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING;POOL SERVICE AND

MAINTENANCE,.INC. and J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING POOL'S, INC. '/.with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto, . ' ' ' " vf • L

ORDERED, that upon notice.,to all co-defendants, all claims aridxross.claims against defendants

J. TORTORELLA •SWIMMING POOL SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE; INC. and J. TORTORELLA

SWIMMING POOL'S, INC-', be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New/ÿork12015 TO-'T ""

Daniel BlouSIMMONS HANLY CONROYAttorney for Plaintiff* •/.112 Madison AveNew York, NY 1*0016 •

tracefe:L. De Mario;'Esq. '

IM%ÿBRADLEY, LLC, N TAttorney for Defendant J. TORTORELLASWIMMING POOLS; INC.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038

SO ORDERED, Dated:TEHon. Peter J. Moulton

AUG 14 2015COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEWYORK

Page 60: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

"f'i '' TJiC/ '; 'V ' * ""

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates.to:

—x

r . NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

-x

Index No. 190002/2015

JOHN PARKE O'CONNOR and PATRICIAO'CONNOR .

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, DefendantALCOA INC., incorrectly 'sued';herein,as- "ALCOA, INC.,Y,

individually and as successor:in,interest to.Reynolds Meÿ'Jasp"stiC(|ÿsÿ'-in interest to Triple

AAA RooTing/'herehy requests summary judgment irivthe/above chiitledjcase, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

ALCOA INC.,withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, -it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, ALCOA INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs. ' . .' V' ÿÿ "

Dated: New York, New York_, 2015

. David A. Chandler, Esq.KARST & VONOISTELLPT576 Fifth Avenue,.Suite 401'New York, New York 10036Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)John Parke O'Connor andPatriciaO 'Connor(212) 764-3900 f ;

Michael J. CurtispEsq.YMALABY & BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantAlcoa Inc. .

(212) 791-0285

SO ORDERED,Vr

Dated::Hon. Peter FUMoulton

m

„ m"> 2015untycLp

ÿVor®0,??ce• '-f.Y .-.,a ÿ

Page 61: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION----------____-------- ---JX

This Document Relates to:DENNIS F. MADDALONE and PATRICIAMADDALONE,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, et a'l .,

Defendants.

NYCALi.A.S. Part(Judge - HeitlreT)

Index No.: 190234/14

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New 'ijqrk, New York2015

Carmen St orge, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffDennis Maddalone700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

(

SO ORDERED:-

Joseph MÿAngiolillo, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13289

d/lt/ls AUG 1* 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S 01F PICE

Page 62: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

-XIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X

Index No. : 190118/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

NIRVA DECOPAIN and MARIE Y. JEUNE , asCo-Executrix for the Estate of JEAN M.DONNAY

Plaintiff (s) ,

- against -

A .O . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al ,

Defendants.--x

WHEREFORE, defendant, MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against

defendant, MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant, MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING

CO. INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkJune 29, 2015

Patti L. Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz Luxenherg, P .C .Attorneys for Plaintiff (s)

NIRVA DECOPAIN and MARIE Y.JEUNE70 0 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003212-558-5500

Austin D. O'Malleÿ/Esq.Gullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantMARIO & DIBONO PLASTERINGINC.44 Wall StreetNew York., New York212-732-2000Our File

CO

10005"?-: %10924-6788ÿÿ

\>\

So Ordered:n. Peter H. Moulton, m

Page 63: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

ai,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-X NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)

Index No. : 190047/15

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:STUART L. McMAHON and CAMILLE McMAHON,

Plaintiff (s) ,- against -

A.O . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al . _Defendants.--------- - -X

! WHEREFORE) defendant GOULDS PUMPS', INC. hereby requests<

ÿ'* ' ' r-' 5-' i • '

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiff's

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. be

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York_9IH_. 2015

COto-crp--""_Patti L. Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff (s)

STUART AND CAMILLE MCMAHON,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Austin D. 0'MalleyÿÿEsqCullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGOULDS PUMPS, INC.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005212-732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13655

So Ordered: —-Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

°iXw ©

court

Page 64: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

I5(o2&

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY.ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

This Document Relates to:JOEL BERLIN and JEANNE BERLIN,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,.

Defendants .

-X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(.(P. Moulton)

Index No.: 190022/15

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to. all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

fork, New

-Dated: New Yor}c, New York

2015

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffJoel Berlin700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED:

Joseph M. ÿerlgiolillo, EsqCullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for Defendafxb,

%4.4 Wall Street, 15th Flopt, SGoulds Pumps, Inc. % <(212) 732-2000Our File No. : 6754ÿ13626

New York, New York 100<£|ÿ

Peter H. Moulton

OW

Page 65: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:JOSE ROSELLI and LESLIE ROSELLI,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

A .0 . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al

Defendants.

-X

-X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(P. Moulton)

Index No.: 190410/14

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests

summary j udgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkPI i7- . 2015

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffJose Roselli700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

oseph M. /Angiolillo, Esq.Cullen anaDykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantdrtnlJa Pwmrvc Tnn &Goulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloNew York, New York 1000(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13588

SO ORDERED:f*

Hon. Peter H. Moulton'ijnjts =0Wl5lB)

Me 12 2015

CIVil

Page 66: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Joseph L. O'Leary and Gail O'Leary

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190132/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,1dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated:New York, NY

Chris Romanelli, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

6552230v.1

/. "Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWHEDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 10557.01613

%, °ei

SJp/i'isAUE 122015

Nys <S~ÿcZr.CIVIL

Page 67: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

<' ".' . J •. : • • »-> .•• ?r • ' •

'

.'

. .ÿ'

: . • .* ."-v ÿ>'

y ?.'r . "5? _ . v •

ÿ

• - ; -V -

SUPREME COURTOF THE.STATE OF NEW YORK - - ; A*"COUNTY OF NEW.YORKY. -7

IN RE NEW YORK .COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,

Index No: 190084/15

Adrian R. SmithNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

.WHEREFORE, "defendant CONWED CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in.the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing'plaintiffs.complaint against defendant CONWED CORPORATION with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CONWED CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without cOsts.

Dated: jH/ (j, £ /„

NewYork, NY

DanielWasserbergÿfeSqMEIROWITZ &WASSERBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff •.

845 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022

SO ORDERED,

Virginia Squitieri,.Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP.Attorney for DefendantCONWED CORPORATION15G;East 42nd Street *New York, NY 10017FileNo.: 07415.002FT 4fa 7

4. PETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.

_

6748989v.1

m n

Page 68: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015 New YorkvrNew:York Ainbtil Long, Esq. '-LEVY,PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERGjLLP Attorneys

ÿV i ÿÿÿ /•'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, iCOUNTY OF NEW YORK U' -

'

. . ,' ;

INRE NEW YORK COUNTY . .ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

This Document Relates To: Index No: 190414/13

William Pagano, as Administrator for the Estateof AnnPagano and William Pagano, Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

- - - x

WHEREFORE,, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, incorrectly s/h/a "BRYANTHEATING & COOLING SYSTEMS" (hereinafter "CARRIER CORPORATION") herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATIONwith prejudice, arid there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendarits, all claims arid cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs. ' *

Dated:NewiMti

York!NY

Weit/M Luxenberg, P/C. . v; A;Attorneys for TlairitifUA "

700 Broadway ' :

New York, NY 100,03,

Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LÿPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATlOr

.'150 East 42nd. StreetNew York, NY 1001ÿ. - ,FileNo.: 10557.01506 UA/Tyn *0?$

%U

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C. %/ahs SQEOWED

AUG 12 2015

6845554v.1 COURT - CIVIL