for fall 2015. u12 choices for the upcoming fall season: full-sided (11v11) small-sided (8v8) ...
TRANSCRIPT
U12 Small-Sided Soccer?
For Fall 2015
Fall 2015 Decision
U12 Choices for the Upcoming Fall Season:
Full-sided (11v11)
Small-sided (8v8)
Both (teams chose and 11v11 and 8v8 brackets are set up)
U11 Coaches’ FeedbackSurvey Results
U11 Coaches’ Feedback
102 Coaches participated in survey. Evaluating the switch to small-sided for U11:
95% thought the ref crews were good to excellent 92% thought playing time was good to excellent 91% thought that the increased number of
touches was good to excellent 94% noticed a good to excellent improvement in
player development 98% experienced a good to excellent coaching
experience
U11 Survey Results
~60% of U11 coaches did not favor playing small-sided at U12
Common concerns: Field size (too many club fields are too small) Roster size (may lose players in smaller clubs) May need additional fields May need additional equipment
Projected Impact
Reminder – 1 field needed for every 6 teams
If we had switched to small-sided for U12 for the Fall 2014-Spring 2015 seasonal year: 9 Clubs may have needed an additional field (Cape
Express, Haddon Hts, Hammonton, Marlton, Monroe, Pal-Riv, RV, West Deptford, Westmont)
If we switch to small-sided for U12 for the Fall 2015-Spring 2015 seasonal year: Same list (RV would not need one but Barrington
might)
U11 Survey CommentsComments, comments, and more comments
U11 Survey Results
Some common “negative” comments on switching to small-sided for U12:
“Not enough space on the field” “Not enough talented coaches to take
advantage of small-sided training” “Small-sided games are controlled by
one dominant player” “It would hurt middle school teams that
are playing 11v11”
U11 Survey Results
Comments cont’d: “We need to have larger rosters to keep
players” “8v8 favors larger slower players” “At U12, players are physically, technically
and tactically ready for a full sided field” “Small-sided at U12 will have negative impact
on high school teams” “The game in real life is played 11v11” “Long term this will make the transition to
college play more difficult”
U11 Survey Results
Comments cont’d: “You will lose teams to MAPS and EDP” “As a coach for over 25 years, 8v8 is not
how soccer is played” “We need to be teaching tactics at U12
and you can’t do that in small-sided” “Only the bottom tier of teams would
benefit from this”
U11 Survey Results
Some common “positive” comments on switching to small-sided for U12:
“We need our young soccer players to touch the soccer ball more often and become more skillful with it!”
“We want our players to make more, less - complicated decisions during the game for better tactical development”
U11 Survey Results
Comments cont’d: “Our players need to learn to be more physically
efficient in the field space they are playing in” “We really need more individual teaching time
with the coach! Fewer players on the field and fewer players on the team will guarantee this! (Need to feel worthy and need to feel important)”
“Small-sided helps provide them with more playing time to learn how to solve problems during the game”
U11 Survey Results
Comments cont’d: “Small-sided allows you to give them more
opportunity to play on both sides of the ball” “Our players need more goal scoring
opportunities – without small-sided play we take away creativity”
“Small-sided provides more socialization and more importantly more FUN”
“A larger field translates to more ‘kicking’ and less passing”
Small-Sided SoccerPros and Cons
U.S. Against the World
All top international academies and teams favor small-sided (some up to U14)
European Club Association Report 214 clubs from 53 associations
including: Real Madrid, Barcelona, Arsenal, Bayern Munich, Inter Milan, Sporting Club, Standard Liege, FC Basel, Panathinaikos FC, Shakhtar Donetsk
European Club AssociationU5 to U9 U10 to U11 U12 to U13 U14 and up
4v4 - 45% 5v5 - 4% 6v6 - 1% 9v9 - 2%
5v5 - 40% 6v6 - 5% 7v7 - 14% 11v11 - 98%
6v6 - 5% 7v7 - 55% 8v8 - 7%
7v7 - 10% 8v8 - 23% 9v9 - 25%
9v9 - 12% 10v10 - 1%
11v11 - 1% 11v11 - 52%(primarily U13)
US Soccer
Annual General Membership Meeting: National Mandate of Small-sided Games
for Players U12 and Younger (tabled) Recommendation:▪ U8 – 5v5▪ U10 – 7v7▪ U12 – 9v9
Nationwide
US Soccer Current Recommendations
U6 - 3 against 3 no goal keepers U8 - 4 against 4 no goal keepers U10 - 6 against 6 with goal keepers U12 - 8 against 8 with goal keepers U13+ - 11 against 11 with goal
keepers
Final Thought
“It all starts with the proper numbers of players at training and games for the specific age group at practice.
For example, 7-9 year olds should play in a 3v3 environment, 10-11 year olds in a 5v5 environment and U12 players should play in a 7v7 environment.
The youth academies in Spain such as Barcelona, Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid play games with player numbers no larger than 7v7 up to12 years old.
The size of the field is smaller and the ball is smaller so that the players can function according to their physical abilities.
They have understood that the players are not yet adults.”
Stan Baker, author and coach
Questions?