for inspection purposes only. consent of copyright owner ... · the site is situated approximately...
TRANSCRIPT
Innovation Centre, Green Road, Carlow, 059-9130314, ernail [email protected] I P
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
lE654 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
1. INTRODUCTION
Geotechnical and Environmental Services Limited [GES] were requested by Staunton Foods Limited
to prepare a baseline report in respect of potential risk to groundwater and surface water on site
from activities on the Staunton Foods site.
The report has been prepared on the basis of the following activities.
o Desk study of information in the public domain or provided by the client. o Site visit on 01 June 2011. o Interpretation of findings.
2. TOPOGRAPHY, SURFACE WATER, CLIMATE
The site is situated approximately 1.5km south of Timoleague at the tip of one of the inlets of
Courtmacsherry Bay [Drawing lE654-001] and comprises an area of approximately 2.2 Ha.
The ground elevation is approximately 10m O.D, but the original topography has been modified by cut and fill to create the existing factory topography. The ground slopes from west to east towards
the Spittal River which enters Courtmacsherry Bay at Spittal Bridge, which is adjacent to the site, and
is recorded on topography maps as the highest point to which ordinary tides flow.
The 30 year annual rainfall for the area is 1154mm [Timoleague GS], and the mean annual evaporation is 571mm [Roches Point] and 513mm [Cork Airport] giving effective rainfall of 583mm
to 641mm per year. Because of the extent of impermeable surface [roof and yard] and the natural
slope, the actual component of groundwater recharge is expected to be low, possibly < 100mm per
year. This means that direct surface run-off , presents a higher risk factor than groundwater in terms
of water from the site acting as a vector and causing an impact on a receiving water
3.GEOLOGlCAL SETTING
3.1 Bedrock
Reference to the available GSI information indicates that the site is underlain by the Toe Head
Formation, which is generically a formation of the Old Red Sandstone, and comprises cross bedded
sandstone and minor mudstone.
There is a major fault shown on the geology map, running North-northeast to South southwest along the western boundary of the site, which juxtaposes the Castlehaven Formation [purple mudstones]
against the Toe Head Formation Figure 3.
Bedrock is indicated to be shallow, generally less than 3m but rock may be just below the surface in
some areas of the site Figure 5
Page I 1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
lE654 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
3.2 Subsoils
The GSI information indicates sandstone and shale TILL is the predominant subsoil type Figure 2 and
this was confirmed on site. This is expected to be of low permeability. The expected shallow
thickness of subsoils renders the site Extreme groundwater vulnerability. Figure 5
3.3 Aquifer Classification.
The GSI have classified the rock type beneath this site as a Locallv Important Auuifer LI. Figure 4
3.4 Water Framework Directive status.
The aquifer is considered to be part of the Bandon Groundwater Body which has a good status overall. The Spittal River has good status. Argideen Estuary has status as it is deemed to be
eutrophic.
4. SITEVISIT
Jerome Keohane of GES visited the site on 01 June 2011. The purpose of the visit was to
Confirm the findings of the desk study.
Undertake a walk-over of the factory site, to enable an assessment of the risks to
groundwater and surface water to be assessed.
The key items having a potential for impact on groundwater or surfacewater are described below
4.1 WASTEWATERTREATMENT
The wastewater treatment plant is at the lowest topographical part of the site, and the treated
effluent is discharged at to the. Spittal River at the Spittal Bridge as shown below and as shown on
the site drawing lE654-002.
The plant processes approximately 120m3/day of effluent derived from the factory processes, and
ancillary services including the lorry wash, weighbridge and staff washrooms and canteens. The
treatment plant comprises the following key components.
Page 12
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
Collection network of drains
Abattoir screen
Primary settlement tank
DAF unit
Two aeration tanks operating in series
An anoxic zone tank
A clarifier
Sludge processing
Final chamber
UV unit
Discharge to river
The plant was noted to be well operated, within capacity, with adequate safeguards in the event of
plant failure or accidental events. The tanks are generally constructed in concrete and their integrity
has been certified by a competent structural engineer. The plant is constructed on a lower level and is surrounded by a soil bund, which would provide some containment in the event of a catastrophic
failure of any of the tanks or connecting pipes in the effluent treatment plant. The integrity of the
feed drains and sumps has also been certified by a competent engineer as has a septic tank, in the
north yard which outfalls to the treatment plant.
4.2 STORMWATER
Stormwater discharges into the river at 3 locations further upstream from the effluent outfall. The
stormwater is mainly derived from yard and roof run-off, which comprises approximately 70% of the
site area.
Stormwater discharge 1 (SW1) collects stormwater from the yard at the western side of the plant,
roofwater from the newer building and the concrete yard at the southern end of the site. The
stormwater is conveyed through an oil water separator, that is regularily inspected and maintained
Stormwater discharge 2 (SW2) collects stormwater from the older factory roofs and the 2011 slaughterhall extension and the remainder of the service yard and front concrete yard to the west,
north and east of the site, except for areas that are drained directly to the effluent plant [including
the weighbridge and the truckwash].
Stormwater discharge 3 (SW3) collects roof run-off from the control room at the Wastewater
Treatment Plant [See Drawing No. 210138-07, Rev.A].
In general, the integrity of the yards and roofs is high, and any incidental spillages, could be
contained by the on-site spill management procedures. Storm discharge 1 (SW1) contains the added
protection of the oil water separator.
4.3 WATER USAGE
Groundwater plays an important role in the water requirements of the site. Currently 2 No. Boreholes exist on the site. One borehole (GW2) supplies all process water used on the site. The
Page 13
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
lE654 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACTASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
other borehole (GW1) supplies the truckwash and lairage spray (See Drawing No. No. 210138-07,
Rev.A). Mains water from Cork County Council supplies approximately 6m3/week, which is used in
the staff canteen and washrooms.
The boreholes are labelled Well 1 and Well 2 in this Report.
Well 1 is the newer of the two wells and was drilled in September 2010, by Southern Pumps Limited,
the well is approximately 35m deep, and has a reported available yield of 10m3/hour, although the
current usage does not require this pumping rate. The well is located on a sloped grassed
embankment to the south of the site and the well head protection comprises a countersunk
concrete sump, with a cast iron cover, flush with the ground, as shown in the photograph below. It is
expected that the catchment for this well extends into agricultural land to the south, and agreement has been reached between Stauntons and the landowner on set back distances in respect of
landspreading and source protection. A sample of groundwater from this well was analysed for a
broad range of potential contaminants, and the results of analysis confirm a good quality water, with a slightly elevated Nitrate concentration, consistent with the general landuse in the area. Results are
presented in Table 1 in appendices.
/WELL 1
Well 2 is 70m deep, was drilled by Harte's well drillers and has a reported available yield of 20m3/day. The well is located adjacent to the utilities building, as shown on the site drawing. The
well head protection comprises a raised plinth with a cast iron cover.
Both wells have been sampled and analysed, and the results of analysis meet the standards for
potable water for the parameters tested.
Well head protection on both is deemed satisfactory in the context of the perceived risk.
A sample of water from the well, confirms the upgradient good quality demonstrated by the sample
from Well 1.
Page I 4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
-- * _ * I
E654 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
Because these wells are pumped they will have established a significant zone of contribution within
the site, and as a result the water quality from the well, will reflect the general water quality in that catchment
4.4 FUELS
A 3000 litre bunded oil tank (T23), formerly in the North Yard, has been relocated near to the main Dispatch, above the oil water separator (See Drawings No. 210138-05, Rev.A and No. 210138-07,
Rev.A). Exposed ground in the vicinity of the former location of the tank (between the septic tank and the truckwash) was examined and showed slight oil staining, but no evidence of significant contamination.
Waste oils generated on the plant are stored in a bund (WS-8) to the rear of the lairage (See Drawing
No. 210138-05, Rev.A).
4.5 CHEMICALS
These are stored in a buncdd area, mainly inside buildings.
4.6 OTHER MATERIALS USED O N SITE
A separate operating company called Irish Casings Limited, operates a recovery process, whereby by- products are selected and processed into a food ingredient. The main chemical used comprises sodium bisulphate, which is corrosive, but non toxic. The tanks is bunded. The processed material is known as mucosa, and it is held in bunded containers, and is taken off-site at regular intervals
4.7 DELIVERIES AND TRUCK WASHING
Live animals are brought onto the site, and a facility for washing the trucks they arrived in is provided, The washwater is conveyed directly to the Effluent Plant. There are in addition truck movements on and off the site of generally short duration. A staff car park is provided at the upper
[Northern] end of the site.
RISK ASSESSMENT
The potential risks are considered in the context of a simple risk model comprising:
Source I> Pathway I> Receptor
Whereby potential source of contamination will only have an impact on a receptor if a pathway
exists, and there is a significant linkage between the two components.
The following table outlines the assessment of the components for this facility
Page 15
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
lE654 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
RECEPTORS Groundwater Surface Water
CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
SOURCES I Potential Pathways Layerage Waste Process Waste Process Effluent Truck washwater Fuels in storage or fuels associated with vehicles Sodium Bisulphate Mucosa tank
Leakage from storage tanks into ground and into groundwater Leakage from transfer pipelines into ground and into groundwater Accidental spillage onto unprotected ground and into groundwater Overland flow direct to River Via stormwater system to River Contamination of River via contamination of
I groundwater on site
CONCRETE YARD
Perimeter clay bund
SPITAL RIVER
Groundwater flow direction
Water table WELL 1
BEDROCK SURFACE
WELL 2
Page 16
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
lE654 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
ASSESSMENT OF POLLUTANT LINKAGES
natural permeability Integrity has been confirmed by competent engineer. Subsoils, although thin appear to be of low natural permeability The majority of unprotected ground is around the perimeter and is at a higher elevation than the work area Subsoils, although thin appear to be of low natural permeability The downgradient side of the site is protected
Direct leakage from vessels into ground
Leakage from transfer pipelines into ground
Accidental spillage onto unprotected ground
Overland flow to River
Potential but considered low risk
LOW risk
Low-moderate risk, but mitigated
Contamination of river via stormwater system
Contamination of River groundwater
contamination
Would require unnoticed spillage to coincide with rainfall event. Mitigation through high dilution potential, interception by by-pass separator in one area
Low risk contamination Would first require groundwater contamination Probably at discharge zone of groundwater body,so will be discharging to estuary. No downgradient beneficial users of groundwater
Page 17
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
/E654 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT-STAUNTON FOODS
APPENDICES
1. Site Location plan lE654-001
2 Geological Maps
Figure 1 Soils Map
Figure 2 Subsoils Map
Figure 3 Bedrock and Structural Geology Map
Figure 4 Aquifer Classification Map
Figure 5 Groundwater Vulnerability Map
3. Site Layout PlanlE654-002
4. Results of groundwater analysis
Page 18
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
A4 Portrait http:/lmaps.epa.ie/internetmapviewer/mapviewer.aspx
EPA Maps Online @Pa The Legend must be printed separately.
I i l l . < ' a - f r , l ,
Sources: EPA, OSi, Teagasc, GSI, NPWS. Pnntina authonsed for Dersonal investiaation of environmental issues. Warning: The EPA does not guarantee the accuracy of data presented on this viewer and is not responsible for incorrect interpretation. I f accuracy is important, it is recommended that you obtain a copy of the original maps on which the information is based and verify its accuracy. If you are printing from Firefox, please stop the download by clicking the X button before printing.
Figure No. 1 Soils Map
1 of2 251os12011 1O:Sl
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
Legend (A4 portrait) http: //maps.epa.i e/i nternetmapvi ewedmapvi ew er.aspx
Full legend This legend may include items that are not in the map window but switched on in the Layers list. If you are printing from Firefox, please stop the download by clicking the X button before printing.
1 o f 2 04/07/2011 08:57
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
I ' I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
1
>s 0) 0 0 -
8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
I 1 I
Q) Q) 0 s
f k
4 CO CO (0
.. 4.0
c Q) 0 Q
E
U m - a, - - 0
c - E 9 s E
o m
0 N IC d 0 0
2 W 0 z m a, B
m
o - - 2.
5
E
v)
d m
U m
N I z
3 E
5 F
3 2. a
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
I I
Q) Q)
R r
Q m cn -
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 22-07-2011:03:43:02