fort lauderdale-hollywood international airport ... · as background information, airfi eld...
TRANSCRIPT
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FAA RECORD OF DECISION
December 2008 Appendix B – Agency Letters: Concurrence, Certifications, Correspondence Page B-1
Appendix B AGENCY LETTERS: CONCURRENCE,
CERTIFICATIONS, CORRESPONDENCE This appendix contains copies of the pertinent correspondence regarding the EIS process, analysis, findings, and the FAA's determinations. The letters are provided in sequential order by date from 2004 when the EIS data collection was initiated through 2008 and the FAA's selection of a preferred alternative.
2003
December 12 Letter from Tom Jargiello, Director of Aviation, Broward County Aviation Department, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, to Dean Stringer, Manager, FAA Orlando Airports District Office. This letter pertains to the approved motions of the Broward County Board of County Commissioners. Dated: December 12, 2003.
2004
November 1 Letter from Tom Jargiello, Director of Aviation, Broward County Aviation Department, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, to Dean Stringer, Manager, FAA Orlando Airports District Office. This letter pertains to the Broward County Board of County Commissioners Goals and Objectives. Dated: November 1, 2004.
2005
December 28 Letter from Frederick P. Gaske, Director, and State Historic Preservation Officer, to John Whitaker, Janus Research, RE: DHR Project File No. 2005-12090. Dated: December 28, 2005.
2006
August 24 Memorandum from Max Wolfe/Eric Bernhardt, Leigh Fisher Associates (now Jacobs Consultancy), to Virginia Lane, AICP, Environmental Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration. Subject: Sponsor’s Proposed Project Operational Assumptions. Dated: August 22, 2006/Revised: August 24, 2006.
December 12 Letter from Gil MacAdam, Broward County Parks and Recreation Division, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: Proposed Temporary Installation of Pipe/West Lake Park. Dated: December 12, 2006.
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FAA RECORD OF DECISION
December 2008 Appendix B – Agency Letters: Concurrence, Certifications, Correspondence Page B-2
2007 (continued)
May 17 Letter from Paul Weller for Miles M. Croom, Assistant Regional Administrator, Habitat Conservation Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: F/SER4:JK/pw. Dated: May 17, 2007.
July 17 Letter from Frederick P. Gaske, Director, and State Historic Preservation Officer, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: DHR Project File No. 2007-2396-B & 2007-2527-B. Dated: July 17, 2007.
August 10 Letter from Josephus Eggelletion, Mayor Broward County Florida, to Bart Vernace, Assistant Manager, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: Broward County (Sponsor) Preferred Runway Alternative. Dated: August 10, 2007.
November 9 Letter from Kent G. George, A.A.E., Director of Aviation, Broward County Aviation Department, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, Subject: Broward County Proposed Noise Mitigation Principles. Dated: November 9, 2007.
December 4 Letter from Marc Gambrill, Acting Director, Planning and Development Aviation, Broward County Aviation Department, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: Use of Wetland Mitigation Credits at West Lake Park for Airport Sponsors Proposed Project at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Broward County, Florida. Dated: December 4, 2007.
December 7 Letter from Kent G. George, A.A.E., Director of Aviation, Broward County Aviation Department, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, to Dean Stringer, Manager, FAA Orlando Airports District Office. RE: This letter pertains to Alternative D2 and Broward County’s comments on the tenant relocation, future tenant expansion capabilities, and future aviation development growth. Dated: December 7, 2007.
2008
January 31 Letter from Paul Souza, Field Supervisor, South Florida Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, South Florida Ecological Services Office, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: Service Federal Activity Code: 41420-2007-FA-0701. Dated: January 31, 2008.
February 5 Letter from Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, to Jocelyn Karazsia, National Marine Fisheries Service, with enclosure Direct, Secondary, and Cumulative Effects on Essential Fish Habitat. Dated: February 5, 2008.
March 6 Letter from Tori K. White, Chief, Palm Beach Gardens Permits Section, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: SAJ-1995-4561. Dated: March 6, 2008.
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FAA RECORD OF DECISION
December 2008 Appendix B – Agency Letters: Concurrence, Certifications, Correspondence Page B-3
2008 (continued)
March 24 Letter from Roy E. Crabtree, Ph.D., Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: File: 1514-22.f.1.FL, Ref: I/SER/2008/00504. Dated: March 24, 2008.
July 25 Letter from Heinz J. Mueller, Chief, NEPA Program Office, Office of Policy and Management, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: EPA NEPA Comments on FAA's FEIS, CEQ #20080244; ERP #FAA-E51052-FL. Dated: July 25, 2008.
July 25 Letter from Paul Weller for Miles M. Croom, Assistant Regional Administrator, Habitat Conservation Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: F/SER4:JK/pw. Dated: July 25, 2008.
July 28 Letter from Sally B. Mann, Director, Office of Intergovernmental Programs, Florida Department of Environmental Projection, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: SAI# FL200806204295C Reference SAI# FL200703223172C. Dated: July 28, 2008.
September 29 Letter from Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, to Jocelyn Karazsia, National Marine Fisheries Service, with enclosure Direct, Secondary, and Cumulative Effects on Essential Fish Habitat. Dated: September 29, 2008.
September 31 Letter from Kent G. George, A.A.E., Director of Aviation, Broward County Aviation Department, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, to Dean Stringer, Manager, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: Sponsor’s Certification in Accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47106(c)(1)(a)(i), (ii), (iii); and Certification in Accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47107(a)(10). Dated: September 31, 2008.
November 25 Email from Pace Wilbur, Atlantic Branch Chief, Charleston (F/SER47) Southeast Regional Office, NOAA Fisheries, to Virginia Lane, FAA Orlando Airports District Office. Dated: November 25, 2008.
December 12 Letter from Kent G. George, A.A.E., Director of Aviation, Broward County Aviation Department, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, to Bart Vernace, Assistant Manager, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, RE: Broward County’s Mitigation of the Environmental Impacts Resulting from Runway Expansion in Accordance with the Conditions of the Record of Decision. Dated December 12, 2008
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FAA RECORD OF DECISION
December 2008 Appendix B – Agency Letters: Concurrence, Certifications, Correspondence Page B-4
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Aug
ust 2
2, 2
006
[Rev
ised
Au
gust
24,
200
6]
ME
MO
RA
ND
UM
To:
Vir
gini
a L
ane,
AIC
P, E
nvir
onm
enta
l Spe
cial
ist
Fed
eral
Avi
atio
n A
dm
inis
trat
ion
From
:M
ax W
olfe
/ E
ric
Ber
nhar
dt
Subj
ect:
Spon
sor’
s Pr
opos
ed P
roje
ct O
pera
tion
al A
ssum
ptio
ns
Per
Tom
Jarg
iello
’s le
tter
of A
ugus
t 22,
200
6 w
hich
res
pond
s to
you
lett
er o
f Aug
ust 7
, 20
06 L
eigh
Fis
her
Ass
ocia
tes
has
prep
ared
the
oper
atio
nal a
ssum
ptio
ns fo
r th
e Sp
onso
r’s
prop
osed
air
fiel
d c
onfi
gura
tion
in 2
012.
Det
aile
d o
pera
tion
al a
ssum
ptio
ns a
re
sum
mar
ized
in th
e fo
llow
ing
sect
ions
.A
cor
resp
ond
ing
runw
ay u
se ta
ble
is a
ttac
hed
to
this
mem
oran
dum
.
Prop
osed
Pro
ject
Phy
sica
l Cha
ract
eris
tics
The
phy
sica
l cha
ract
eris
tics
of t
he S
pons
or’s
Pro
pose
d P
roje
ct a
re d
ocum
ente
d in
an
Aug
ust 7
, 200
6, le
tter
from
FA
A to
BC
AD
. T
he S
pons
or’s
Pro
pos
ed P
roje
ct in
clu
des
le
ngth
enin
gan
d w
iden
ing
Run
way
9R
-27L
to a
leng
th o
f 8,0
00 fe
et o
f usa
ble
pave
men
t by
150
feet
wid
e w
ith
aC
ateg
ory
I Ins
trum
ent L
and
ing
Syst
em o
n bo
th r
unw
ay e
nds.
As
part
of t
he p
roje
ct, R
unw
ay 1
3-31
wou
ld b
e d
ecom
mis
sion
ed.
2012
Ope
ratio
nal A
ssum
ptio
nsT
he o
pera
tion
al a
ssum
ptio
ns p
rese
nted
her
ein
wer
e th
ose
used
by
LFA
to p
repa
re th
e no
ise
cont
ours
for
the
SR-2
cas
e in
the
Nov
embe
r 20
03 L
FA r
epor
t, A
sses
smen
t of A
irfie
ld
Dev
elop
men
t Alt
erna
tive
s.T
he a
ssu
mp
tion
s w
ere
der
ived
from
the
follo
win
g d
ocum
ents
:(1
)the
Nov
embe
r 20
02 F
AA
rep
ort,
Seco
nd S
uppl
emen
t to
the
Dra
ft E
IS (
SSD
EIS
); (2
) In
terl
ocal
Agr
eem
ent b
etw
een
the
Cit
y of
Dan
ia B
each
and
Bro
war
d C
ount
y); a
nd (3
)ai
rfie
ld a
naly
sis
cond
uct
ed b
y as
par
t of t
he N
ovem
ber
2003
.
Ru
nw
ay U
se
The
ass
ignm
ent o
f spe
cifi
c ai
rcra
ft u
ser
grou
ps (h
eavy
jet,
com
mut
er p
rop,
etc
.) to
ru
nway
end
s of
the
prop
osed
air
fiel
d in
201
2 w
as b
ased
on
the
follo
win
g as
sum
ptio
ns:
2
Vir
gini
a L
ane,
AIC
P, F
AA
Aug
ust 2
2, 2
006
�N
o us
e re
stri
ctio
ns o
n th
e N
orth
Run
way
�D
ayti
me
use
of th
e So
uth
Run
way
wou
ld b
e re
stri
cted
to S
tage
3 a
ircr
aft o
nly
�T
he S
outh
Run
way
wou
ld b
e th
e pr
imar
y ta
ke-o
ff r
unw
ay in
eas
t flo
w a
nd th
e pr
imar
y la
ndin
g ru
nway
in w
est f
low
.�
Air
craf
texc
eed
ing
58,0
00 p
ound
s w
ould
onl
y la
nd to
the
wes
t and
dep
art t
o th
e ea
st o
n th
e So
uth
Ru
nway
. H
owev
er, a
s no
ted
bel
ow, o
n a
limit
ed b
asis
, air
craf
t ex
ceed
ing
58,0
00 p
ound
s w
ould
land
on
the
Sout
h R
unw
ay d
urin
g ea
st fl
ow IF
R
orta
ke-o
ffon
the
Sout
h R
unw
ay d
urin
g w
est f
low
IFR
cond
itio
ns to
avo
id
unn
eces
sary
del
ays
or d
ue
to a
n op
erat
iona
l nec
essi
ty s
uch
as
a ru
nway
clo
sure
or
equi
pmen
t fai
lure
�N
ight
tim
e op
erat
ions
(bet
wee
n 10
:00
pm a
nd 7
:00
am) w
ould
be
proh
ibit
ed o
n th
e So
uth
Run
way
, exc
ept f
or r
unw
ay c
losu
re, e
quip
men
t fai
lure
, or
othe
r op
erat
iona
l ne
cess
ity.
As
back
grou
nd in
form
atio
n, a
irfi
eld
sim
ula
tion
ana
lyse
s co
ndu
cted
for t
he N
ovem
ber
2003
LFA
rep
orti
ndic
ate
that
, by
the
2012
to 2
015
tim
efra
me,
som
e lim
ited
use
of t
he
exte
nded
Sou
thR
unw
ay b
y ai
rcra
ft o
ver
58,0
00 p
ound
sla
ndin
gfr
om th
e w
est a
nd
taki
ng-o
ffto
the
wes
t wou
ld b
e ne
cess
ary,
par
ticu
larl
y d
urin
g IF
R c
ond
itio
ns, t
o m
aint
ain
reas
onab
le le
vels
of d
elay
as
prov
ided
in “
Pha
se 2
” of
the
Inte
rloc
al A
gree
men
t(s
ee p
age
52 o
f tha
t rep
ort)
.
Flig
ht T
rack
s
Flig
ht tr
ack
assu
mpt
ions
are
as
follo
ws:
�D
epar
ture
s m
akin
g d
iver
gent
turn
s of
15°
or
30°
shou
ld m
aint
ain
the
div
erge
nt
head
ing
unti
l 3.0
nau
tica
l mile
s or
3,0
00 fe
et A
GL
bef
ore
turn
ing
on c
ours
e (A
pplie
s to
Nor
th R
unw
ay h
ead
ings
of 0
90°,
075
°, a
nd 0
60°;
and
Sou
th R
unw
ay
head
ings
of 0
90°
and
105
°)�
Off
set a
ppro
ache
s w
ould
be
prov
ided
on
the
Nor
th R
unw
ay o
nly
Oth
er A
ssu
mp
tion
s
All
othe
r op
erat
iona
l ass
umpt
ions
for
2012
are
unc
hang
ed fr
om th
ose
doc
umen
ted
in th
e FA
A’s
pre
viou
s d
efin
itio
n of
the
Spon
sor’
s P
ropo
sed
Pro
ject
(Jun
e 14
, 200
6,M
emor
and
um,F
AA
EIS
Noi
se M
odel
ing
Ass
umpt
ions
for
the
2012
Spo
nsor
’s P
ropo
sed
Pro
ject
Upd
ate,
For
t Lau
derd
ale-
Hol
lyw
ood
Inte
rnat
iona
l Air
port
, Lan
dru
m &
Bro
wn,
Inc.
), in
clu
din
g ru
nway
def
init
ion,
num
ber
of a
nnua
l ave
rage
day
ope
rati
ons,
flee
t mix
, day
-nig
htd
istr
ibu
tion
, and
gro
und
ru
n-u
p n
oise
.
**
**
*
3
Vir
gini
a L
ane,
AIC
P, F
AA
Aug
ust 2
2, 2
006
Ple
ase
call
if y
ou h
ave
any
ques
tion
s or
req
uire
d a
dd
itio
nal i
nfor
mat
ion.
We
are
also
prep
ared
to tr
ansf
er th
e op
erat
iona
l ass
umpt
ions
pro
vid
ed h
erei
n to
your
EIS
con
trac
tor,
L
and
rum
& B
row
n, In
c.
cc:
Tom
Jarg
iello
, BC
AD
Bob
Bie
lek,
BC
AD
B
olfi
Pos
adas
, BC
AD
Nic
k D
avid
son,
LFA
Kim
Day
, LFA
Bill
Du
nlay
, LFA
Lar
ry C
olem
an, L
FASu
zie
Kle
ymey
er, L
&B
Sara
Pot
ter,
L&
BSt
eve
Mar
tin
4
Vir
gini
a L
ane,
AIC
P, F
AA
Aug
ust 2
2, 2
006
ATT
AC
HM
ENT
1A
NN
UA
LIZ
ED
RU
NW
AY
USE
AS
SU
MP
TIO
NS
SP
ON
SO
R’S
PR
OP
OS
ED
PR
OJE
CT
--20
12
Ru
nw
ay
Use
r G
rou
p09
L09
R13
27R
27L
31T
otal
Air
Car
rier
/C
argo
Tak
eoff
Day
tim
e17
%63
%--
17%
3%--
100%
Hea
vy J
et
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
20%
----
100%
Land
ing
Day
tim
e69
%11
%--
3%17
%--
100%
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
18%
2%--
100%
Tak
eoff
Day
tim
e18
%62
%--
17%
3%--
100%
Larg
e Je
t
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
20%
----
100%
Land
ing
Day
tim
e69
%11
%--
3%17
%--
100%
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
18%
2%--
100%
Com
mu
ter/
Air
Tax
iT
akeo
ffD
ayti
me
26%
54%
--17
%3%
--10
0%C
omm
ute
r Je
t
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
20%
----
100%
Land
ing
Day
tim
e69
%11
%--
3%17
%--
100%
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
18%
2%--
100%
Tak
eoff
Day
tim
e14
%66
%--
17%
3%--
100%
Com
mu
ter
Pro
p
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
20%
----
100%
Land
ing
Day
tim
e66
%14
%--
3%17
%--
100%
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
18%
2%--
100%
Gen
eral
Avi
atio
n/M
ilit
ary
Tak
eoff
Day
tim
e11
%69
%--
17%
3%--
100%
Gen
eral
Avi
atio
n Je
tN
ight
tim
e77
%3%
--20
%--
--10
0%La
ndin
gD
ayti
me
69%
11%
--3%
17%
--10
0%N
ight
tim
e77
%3%
--18
%2%
--10
0%T
akeo
ffD
ayti
me
19%
61%
--15
%5%
--10
0%G
ener
alA
viat
ion
Pro
p
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
20%
----
100%
Land
ing
Day
tim
e61
%19
%--
5%15
%--
100%
Nig
htti
me
77%
3%--
18%
2%--
100%
5
Vir
gini
a L
ane,
AIC
P, F
AA
Aug
ust 2
2, 2
006
----
-Origin
al M
essa
ge-
----
Fr
om
: Robin
Wie
ble
r [m
ailto:R
obin
.Wie
ble
r@noaa
.gov]
Post
ed A
t: T
hurs
day
, M
ay 1
7,
2007 9
:45 A
M
Post
ed T
o:
Conve
rsat
ion:
DEIS
for
Dev
elopm
ent
and E
xten
sion o
f Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L
Subje
ct:
DEIS
for
Dev
elopm
ent
and E
xten
sion o
f Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L
Virg
inia
Lan
e En
viro
nmen
tal S
peci
alis
t U
.S. D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
tratio
n 59
50 H
azel
tine
Nat
iona
l Driv
e O
rland
o, F
lorid
a 32
822-
5024
Dea
r Ms.
Lane
:
NO
AA
’s N
atio
nal M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies S
ervi
ce (N
MFS
) rev
iew
ed th
e dr
aft E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct
Stat
emen
t (EI
S), d
ated
Mar
ch 2
1, 2
007,
for t
he d
evel
opm
ent a
nd e
xten
sion
of r
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L
and
othe
r ass
ocia
ted
airp
ort p
roje
cts a
t the
For
t Lau
derd
ale-
Hol
lyw
ood
Inte
rnat
iona
l Airp
ort
(FLL
). T
he d
raft
EIS,
pre
pare
d by
the
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
tratio
n (F
AA
), de
scrib
es th
e en
viro
nmen
tal i
mpa
cts a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e ai
rpor
t pro
ject
s pro
pose
d by
the
Bro
war
d C
ount
y B
oard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
oner
s (B
row
ard
Cou
nty)
, whi
ch is
the
owne
r and
ope
rato
r of F
LL.
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
draf
t EIS
, the
exi
stin
g ai
rfie
ld la
cks s
uffic
ient
cap
acity
to a
ccom
mod
ate
the
fore
cast
ed d
eman
d fo
r its
use
und
er a
ccep
tabl
e op
erat
ing
cond
ition
s. In
ord
er to
add
ress
this
ne
ed, B
row
ard
Cou
nty
has p
ropo
sed:
exp
ansi
on a
nd e
leva
tion
of R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L; c
onst
ruct
ion
of a
n ou
ter d
ual p
aral
lel t
axiw
ay th
at w
ould
be
sepa
rate
d fr
om th
e pr
opos
ed n
orth
side
par
alle
l ta
xiw
ay b
y 27
6 fe
et; c
onst
ruct
ion
of c
onne
ctin
g ta
xiw
ays f
rom
the
prop
osed
full-
leng
th p
aral
lel
taxi
way
to e
xist
ing
taxi
way
s; a
nd c
onst
ruct
ion
of a
n In
stru
men
t Lan
ding
Sys
tem
(ILS
) for
la
ndin
gs o
n R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L.
Run
way
9R
/27L
wou
ld h
ave
a C
ateg
ory
I ILS
, whi
ch in
clud
es a
M
ediu
m In
tens
ity A
ppro
ach
Ligh
t Sys
tem
(MA
LSR
) with
runw
ay a
lignm
ent i
ndic
ator
ligh
ts, a
lo
caliz
er, a
nd a
glid
eslo
pe.
The
prop
osed
wor
k w
ill a
lso
incl
ude
deco
mm
issi
onin
g of
Run
way
13
/31
and
rede
velo
pmen
t of a
term
inal
gat
e.
The
draf
t EIS
pre
sent
s an
anal
ysis
of s
ever
al o
n-si
te a
nd o
ffsi
te si
te a
ltern
ativ
es, i
n ad
ditio
n to
th
e no
-act
ion
alte
rnat
ive.
The
FA
A d
oes n
ot p
rese
nt a
pre
ferr
ed a
ltern
ativ
e in
the
draf
t EIS
, he
nce
the
draf
t EIS
doe
s not
incl
ude
a st
atem
ent o
f the
ove
rall
impa
ct o
f the
pro
pose
d ac
tions
on
esse
ntia
l fis
h ha
bita
t (EF
H),
as re
quire
d by
50
CFR
Sec
tion
600.
920(
e).
How
ever
as a
n in
dica
tion
of w
hat t
he F
AA
’s p
refe
rred
alte
rnat
ive
mig
ht b
e, B
row
ard
Cou
nty’
s pre
ferr
ed
alte
rnat
ive
is p
rese
nted
. B
row
ard
Cou
nty’
s pre
ferr
ed a
ltern
ativ
e (A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c) w
ould
impa
ct
appr
oxim
atel
y 15
.41
acre
s of w
etla
nds i
nclu
ding
3.0
5 ac
res o
f est
uarin
e em
erge
nt v
eget
atio
n (m
angr
oves
), w
hich
are
des
igna
ted
as E
FH.
Oth
er a
ltern
ativ
es p
rese
nted
(suc
h as
Alte
rnat
ive
D1)
cou
ld a
dver
sely
aff
ect a
s muc
h as
21.
87 a
cres
of w
etla
nds.
The
airp
ort e
xpan
sion
act
iviti
es
are
loca
ted
in w
ater
s of t
he U
nite
s Sta
tes a
djac
ent t
o th
e D
ania
cut
-off
can
al a
nd A
tlant
ic
UN
ITED
STA
TES
DEP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
OM
MER
CE
Nati
on
al O
cean
ic a
nd
Atm
osp
heri
c A
dm
inis
trati
on
NA
TIO
NA
L M
AR
INE
FIS
HE
RIE
S S
ER
VIC
E
Sout
heas
t Reg
iona
l Off
ice
263
13th
Ave
nue
Sout
h St
. Pet
ersb
urg,
Flo
rida
337
01-5
511
(727
) 824
-531
7; F
AX
(727
) 824
-530
0 ht
tp://
sero
.nm
fs.n
oaa.
gov/
May
17,
200
7 F/
SER
4:JK
/pw
- 2
-
Intra
coas
tal W
ater
way
(AIW
W) i
n B
row
ard
Cou
nty,
Flo
rida.
As t
he n
atio
n’s f
eder
al tr
uste
e fo
r th
e co
nser
vatio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of m
arin
e, e
stua
rine,
and
ana
drom
ous f
ishe
ry re
sour
ces,
the
follo
win
g co
mm
ents
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
are
pro
vide
d pu
rsua
nt to
aut
horit
ies o
f the
Fis
h an
d W
ildlif
e C
oord
inat
ion
Act
and
the
Mag
nuso
n-St
even
s Fis
hery
Con
serv
atio
n an
d M
anag
emen
t A
ct (M
agnu
son-
Stev
ens A
ct).
Con
sulta
tion
His
tory
B
y le
tter d
ated
Apr
il 6,
200
1, N
MFS
resp
onde
d to
the
draf
t EIS
, dat
ed F
ebru
ary
5, 2
001,
for t
he
expa
nsio
n of
runw
ay 9
R/2
7L.
In th
is le
tter,
NM
FS re
ques
ted
that
the
FAA
con
sult
with
our
of
fice
purs
uant
to 5
0 C
FR S
ectio
n 60
0.92
0 fo
r adv
erse
aff
ects
to E
FH.
By
lette
r dat
ed Ja
nuar
y 23
, 200
2, N
MFS
pro
vide
com
men
ts o
n th
e D
ecem
ber 2
6, 2
001,
EFH
ass
essm
ent p
repa
red
for t
he
expa
nsio
n of
runw
ay 9
R/2
7L.
This
ass
essm
ent d
escr
ibed
impa
cts t
o 17
.8 a
cres
of m
angr
oves
. In
th
is le
tter,
we
prov
ided
thre
e EF
H c
onse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
enda
tions
: (1)
A p
lan
shal
l be
deve
lope
d an
d im
plem
ente
d to
avo
id a
nd/o
r min
imiz
e di
rect
, sec
onda
ry, a
nd c
umul
ativ
e ad
vers
e ef
fect
s to
wet
land
s; (2
) A p
lan
shal
l be
deve
lope
d fo
r pro
vidi
ng fu
ll, in
-kin
d co
mpe
nsat
ion
for u
navo
idab
le
adve
rse
impa
cts t
o w
etla
nds;
and
(3) A
mon
itorin
g pl
an sh
all b
e de
velo
ped
to a
sses
s the
ec
olog
ical
succ
ess o
f the
off
site
, com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion.
A su
pple
men
t to
the
draf
t EIS
was
pub
lishe
d du
ring
Febr
uary
200
2 to
upd
ate
avia
tion
fore
cast
s.
NM
FS d
id n
ot fi
nd th
at th
e su
pple
men
tal i
nfor
mat
ion
affe
cted
the
prev
ious
ly d
escr
ibed
impa
cts
to E
FH a
nd, t
here
fore
, NM
FS d
id n
ot p
rovi
de c
omm
ents
. B
y le
tter d
ated
Janu
ary
13, 2
003,
N
MFS
pro
vide
d co
mm
ents
on
the
Nov
embe
r 200
2 se
cond
supp
lem
ent t
o th
e dr
aft E
IS.
This
se
cond
supp
lem
ent d
iscu
ssed
cha
nges
rega
rdin
g no
ise
impa
cts a
nd th
e m
itiga
tion
of su
ch
impa
cts.
Aga
in, N
MFS
det
erm
ined
that
the
prop
osed
adv
erse
aff
ects
to E
FH d
id n
ot c
hang
e as
a
resu
lt of
the
supp
lem
enta
l inf
orm
atio
n an
d, th
eref
ore,
we
did
not p
rovi
de a
dditi
onal
com
men
ts.
How
ever
, in
this
lette
r we
rest
ated
the
thre
e EF
H c
onse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
enda
tions
pro
vide
d ea
rlier
.
In 2
005,
the
FAA
cho
se to
rest
art t
he e
nviro
nmen
tal a
naly
sis g
iven
Bro
war
d C
ount
y’s d
ecis
ion
to p
ursu
e ad
ditio
nal a
irsid
e an
d la
ndsi
de p
lann
ing
stud
ies i
n 20
03 a
nd 2
004.
As a
resu
lt of
thes
e st
udie
s, a
revi
sed
proj
ect w
as d
evel
oped
. In
pre
para
tion
of th
e pr
esen
t (fo
urth
) dra
ft EI
S, th
e FA
A h
as re
lied
on th
e re
cent
pla
nnin
g an
d te
chni
cal s
tudi
es c
ompl
eted
by
Bro
war
d C
ount
y.
Proj
ect A
rea
NM
FS st
aff i
s fam
iliar
with
the
area
and
has
con
duct
ed si
te v
isits
at F
LL, m
ost r
ecen
tly o
n A
ugus
t 10,
200
6. T
he w
etla
nd sy
stem
at F
LL c
onsi
sts o
f man
grov
es (r
ed m
angr
oves
, whi
te
man
grov
es, b
lack
man
grov
es, a
nd b
utto
nwoo
ds) w
ith v
ario
us d
egre
es o
f inf
esta
tion
by
Aus
tralia
n pi
ne a
nd B
razi
lian
pepp
er.
Alte
rnat
ives
Th
e dr
aft E
IS d
escr
ibes
11
offs
ite a
ltern
ativ
es, 1
8 on
-site
alte
rnat
ives
, and
the
no a
ctio
n al
tern
ativ
e. T
he F
AA
det
erm
ined
that
the
11 o
ffsi
te a
ltern
ativ
es w
ere
not r
easo
nabl
e an
d th
eref
ore
elim
inat
ed th
ese
alte
rnat
ives
from
furth
er e
valu
atio
n. T
he F
AA
det
erm
ined
that
six
of
the
on-s
ite a
ltern
ativ
es c
ould
mee
t the
pur
pose
est
ablis
hed
for t
he p
roje
ct.
- 3
-
Impa
cts t
o Es
sent
ial F
ish
Hab
itat
Of t
he si
x al
tern
ativ
es th
at th
e ap
plic
ant d
eter
min
ed w
ould
mee
t the
pro
ject
pur
pose
and
nee
d,
the
impa
cts t
o EF
H v
ary
from
0.1
3 to
3.0
5 ac
res.
An
EFH
ass
essm
ent i
s pro
vide
d in
Sec
tion
6.F.
1.4
of th
e dr
aft E
IS.
Bro
war
d C
ount
y’s p
refe
rred
alte
rnat
ive
wou
ld d
irect
ly im
pact
3.0
5 ac
res o
f man
grov
es.
We
ackn
owle
dge
and
appr
ecia
te th
e su
bsta
ntia
l im
pact
min
imiz
atio
n th
at
has o
ccur
red
sinc
e th
e in
itial
dra
ft EI
S re
view
dur
ing
2001
, whi
ch id
entif
ied
over
17
acre
s of
EFH
that
wou
ld b
e im
pact
ed b
y th
e pr
ojec
t.
The
Bro
war
d C
ount
y’s p
refe
rred
alte
rnat
ive
(Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
) inc
lude
s the
follo
win
g co
mpo
nent
s tha
t wou
ld a
dver
sely
aff
ect E
FH:
�Ex
pans
ion
and
elev
atio
n of
Run
way
9R
/27L
to a
n ov
eral
l len
gth
of 8
,000
feet
and
wid
th
of 1
50 fe
et a
nd c
onst
ruct
ion
of a
new
full-
leng
th p
aral
lel t
axiw
ay 7
5 fe
et w
ide
on th
e no
rth si
de o
f Run
way
9R
/27L
with
sepa
ratio
n of
400
feet
from
9R
/27L
. Th
is a
ctio
n w
ould
adv
erse
ly a
ffec
t 2.8
7 ac
res o
f man
grov
es.
�In
stal
latio
n of
runw
ay a
ppro
ach
light
s and
ass
ocia
ted
acce
ss ro
ads.
Thi
s act
ion
wou
ld
adve
rsel
y af
fect
0.3
8 ac
res o
f man
grov
es.
Aut
horiz
atio
n of
the
prop
osed
pro
ject
will
resu
lt in
the
loss
of 3
.05
acre
s of h
abita
ts d
esig
nate
d as
EFH
by
the
Sout
h A
tlant
ic F
ishe
ry M
anag
emen
t Cou
ncil
(SA
FMC
). F
eder
ally
man
aged
fis
hery
spec
ies a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith e
stua
rine
emer
gent
veg
etat
ion,
incl
udin
g m
angr
ove
habi
tat,
incl
udes
pos
tlarv
al, j
uven
ile, a
nd a
dult
gray
, lan
e an
d sc
hool
mas
ter s
napp
ers;
juve
nile
Gol
iath
gr
oupe
r and
mut
ton
snap
per;
and
adul
t whi
te g
runt
. Th
ese
area
s pla
y an
impo
rtant
role
in th
e ec
olog
ical
func
tion
of S
outh
Atla
ntic
est
uarin
e ec
osys
tem
s, pa
rticu
larly
in re
gard
to p
rimar
y pr
oduc
tion
and
wat
er q
ualit
y. D
etai
led
info
rmat
ion
on th
e sn
appe
r/gro
uper
com
plex
(con
tain
ing
ten
fam
ilies
and
73
spec
ies)
and
oth
er fe
dera
lly m
anag
ed fi
sher
y sp
ecie
s and
thei
r EFH
is
prov
ided
in th
e 19
98 c
ompr
ehen
sive
am
endm
ent t
o th
e fis
hery
man
agem
ent p
lans
for t
he S
outh
A
tlant
ic re
gion
; the
am
endm
ent w
as p
repa
red
by th
e SA
FMC
as r
equi
red
by th
e M
agnu
son-
Stev
ens A
ct.
Man
grov
e w
etla
nds a
re a
lso
desi
gnat
ed b
y th
e SA
FMC
as a
Hab
itat A
rea
of
Parti
cula
r Con
cern
(HA
PC),
whi
ch a
re su
bset
s of E
FH th
at a
re ra
re, p
artic
ular
ly su
scep
tible
to
hum
an-in
duce
d de
grad
atio
n, e
spec
ially
impo
rtant
eco
logi
cally
, or l
ocat
ed in
an
envi
ronm
enta
lly
stre
ssed
are
a.
In a
dditi
on to
thes
e de
sign
atio
ns b
y th
e SA
FMC
, man
grov
es in
this
are
a pr
ovid
e nu
rser
y,
fora
ging
, and
refu
ge h
abita
t for
oth
er c
omm
erci
ally
and
recr
eatio
nally
impo
rtant
fish
and
sh
ellfi
sh, s
uch
as sn
ook,
strip
ed m
ulle
t, ta
rpon
, and
blu
e cr
ab, a
nd th
at th
e cu
mul
ativ
e lo
ss o
f m
angr
oves
has
redu
ced
over
all f
ishe
ries p
rodu
ctio
n w
ithin
the
sout
heas
t Flo
rida
ecos
yste
m.
Furth
er, m
angr
oves
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a in
dire
ctly
supp
ort f
ishe
ry h
abita
t by
cont
rolli
ng ru
noff
and
tu
rbid
ity a
nd b
y st
abili
zing
sedi
men
t, ec
olog
ical
func
tions
ess
entia
l to
supp
ortin
g ad
jace
nt w
ater
s of
the
Dan
ia c
ut-o
ff c
anal
and
AIW
W.
Man
grov
e w
etla
nds d
irect
ly b
enef
it th
e fis
hery
reso
urce
s of t
he so
uthe
ast F
lorid
a by
pro
vidi
ng
nurs
ery
habi
tat.
Fur
ther
, man
grov
es a
re p
art o
f a h
abita
t com
plex
that
incl
udes
seag
rass
and
har
d bo
ttom
hab
itats
, and
this
com
plex
supp
orts
a d
iver
se c
omm
unity
of f
ish
and
inve
rtebr
ates
. M
angr
ove
wet
land
s als
o pr
ovid
e im
porta
nt w
ater
qua
lity
mai
nten
ance
func
tions
, suc
h as
po
llutio
n up
take
(bio
-ass
imila
tion)
. M
angr
oves
als
o st
abili
ze sh
orel
ines
, atte
nuat
e w
ave
actio
n,
and
prod
uce
and
expo
rt de
tritu
s (de
cayi
ng o
rgan
ic m
ater
ial),
whi
ch is
an
impo
rtant
com
pone
nt o
f
- 4
-
mar
ine
and
estu
arin
e fo
od c
hain
s. T
he c
umul
ativ
e lo
ss o
f the
se h
abita
ts h
as a
nd c
ontin
ues t
o re
duce
ove
rall
fishe
ries p
rodu
ctio
n w
ithin
Flo
rida
wat
ers.
In fa
ct, m
angr
ove
fore
sts a
re o
ne o
f th
e w
orld
’s m
ost t
hrea
tene
d tro
pica
l eco
syst
ems w
ith g
loba
l los
s exc
eedi
ng 3
5 pe
rcen
t, an
d th
e cu
rren
t rat
es o
f man
grov
e de
fore
stat
ion
are
likel
y to
impa
ct se
vere
ly th
e fu
nctio
n, fi
sher
ies
prod
uctiv
ity, a
nd re
silie
nce
of re
efs (
Mum
by e
t. al
200
4)1 .
EFH
Ass
essm
ent I
nfor
mat
ion
Nee
ds
The
draf
t EIS
pro
vide
s sev
eral
item
s req
uire
d by
50
CFR
Sec
tion
600.
920(
e) fo
r an
EFH
as
sess
men
t, in
clud
ing
a de
scrip
tion
of th
e pr
opos
ed a
ctio
n, a
n an
alys
is o
f dire
ct im
pact
s to
fishe
ry re
sour
ces b
y lif
e hi
stor
y st
age,
avo
idan
ce a
nd m
inim
izat
ion
to E
FH, a
nd a
ltern
ativ
es to
th
e pr
opos
ed a
ctio
n. H
owev
er a
dditi
onal
info
rmat
ion
is n
eede
d in
ord
er fo
r NM
FS to
fully
ev
alua
te th
e pr
opos
ed w
ork:
�A
full
asse
ssm
ent o
f cum
ulat
ive
effe
cts.
In th
is re
gard
, we
note
that
ther
e ar
e a
few
pas
t, pr
esen
t, an
d re
ason
ably
fore
seea
ble
futu
re a
ctiv
ities
that
hav
e be
en o
mitt
ed in
the
cum
ulat
ive
effe
cts d
iscu
ssio
n (d
raft
EIS,
cha
pter
7),
incl
udin
g th
e pr
opos
ed U
.S. B
orde
r Pa
trol f
acili
ty (a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith U
.S. A
rmy
Cor
ps o
f Eng
inee
rs p
erm
it ap
plic
atio
n nu
mbe
r SA
J-20
06-3
233)
that
pro
pose
s to
adve
rsel
y af
fect
ove
r 4 a
cres
of m
angr
oves
. N
MFS
is
conc
erne
d th
at, a
s a re
sult
of c
umul
ativ
e im
pact
s to
EFH
in B
row
ard
Cou
nty,
littl
e to
no
com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion
optio
ns a
re a
vaila
ble
with
in th
e af
fect
ed w
ater
shed
. Th
eref
ore,
w
e re
com
men
d th
at th
e cu
mul
ativ
e ef
fect
s ass
essm
ent p
rovi
de a
tabl
e of
pas
t, pr
esen
t, an
d re
ason
ably
fore
seea
ble
EFH
impa
cts t
hat i
nclu
des a
des
crip
tion
of h
ow su
ch im
pact
s ha
ve b
een/
will
be
miti
gate
d.
�Th
e FA
A’s
, or l
ead
fede
ral a
genc
y’s,
view
s reg
ardi
ng th
e ef
fect
s of t
he a
ctio
n on
EFH
.A
lthou
gh th
e FA
A st
ates
that
eac
h al
tern
ativ
e w
ould
not
resu
lt in
a si
gnifi
cant
impa
ct to
EF
H, t
his d
eter
min
atio
n is
bas
ed o
n th
e as
sum
ptio
n th
at th
e im
pact
s can
be
miti
gate
d (s
ee
next
item
). �
Com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion
plan
. Th
e dr
aft E
IS st
ates
that
ther
e m
ay b
e co
mpe
nsat
ory
miti
gatio
n op
tions
ava
ilabl
e at
Wes
t Lak
e Pa
rk a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e ha
bita
t res
tora
tion
auth
oriz
ed b
y th
e D
epar
tmen
t of t
he A
rmy
via
perm
it nu
mbe
r 200
2-00
72 (I
P-LA
O),
how
ever
we
are
also
aw
are
of o
ther
pro
ject
s by
the
Bro
war
d C
ount
y B
oard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
oner
s (su
ch a
s the
Por
t Eve
rgla
des E
xpan
sion
) tha
t pro
pose
to u
se th
is
miti
gatio
n as
wel
l. T
he E
FH a
sses
smen
t sho
uld
fully
des
crib
e ho
w m
angr
ove
impa
cts
wou
ld b
e m
itiga
ted.
(Se
e EF
H c
onse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
enda
tions
for a
dditi
onal
in
form
atio
n.)
�U
nifie
d M
itiga
tion
Ass
essm
ent M
etho
d (U
MA
M) s
core
s. T
he d
raft
EIS
prov
ides
U
MA
M sc
ores
for t
he w
etla
nd a
reas
pro
pose
d fo
r im
pact
und
er B
row
ard
Cou
nty’
s pr
efer
red
alte
rnat
ive.
How
ever
, the
onl
y w
ay to
det
erm
ine
the
amou
nt o
f miti
gatio
n ne
cess
ary
to o
ffse
t 3.0
5 ac
res o
f man
grov
e w
etla
nds w
ould
be
to h
ave
UM
AM
scor
es fo
r th
e m
itiga
tion
site
, whi
ch a
re n
ot in
clud
ed in
the
draf
t EIS
. Th
e co
mpe
nsat
ory
miti
gatio
n pl
an sh
ould
incl
ude
all n
eces
sary
UM
AM
scor
es to
det
erm
ine
that
all
func
tiona
l los
ses
can
be m
itiga
ted.
1 Mum
by P
.J., J
. E. A
lasd
air,
E. A
rias-
Gon
zale
z, K
.C. L
inde
man
, P.G
. Bla
ckw
ell,
A. G
all,
M.I.
Gor
czyn
ska,
A.R
. H
arbo
rne,
C.L
. Pes
cod,
H. R
enke
n, C
.C. W
abni
tz, a
nd G
. Lle
wel
lyn.
200
4. M
angr
oves
enh
ance
the
biom
ass o
f co
ral r
eef f
ish
com
mun
ities
in th
e C
arib
bean
. N
atur
e 27
: 533
-536
.
- 5
-
Bas
ed o
n th
e ab
ove
disc
ussi
on o
f dire
ct a
nd in
dire
ct im
pact
s lik
ely
to re
sult
from
the
prop
osed
pr
ojec
t, N
MFS
con
clud
es th
at th
e po
tent
ial a
dver
se im
pact
s to
EFH
and
oth
er li
ving
mar
ine
reso
urce
s cou
ld o
ccur
as a
resu
lt of
the
prop
osed
wor
k. S
ectio
n 30
5(b)
(4)(
A) o
f the
Mag
nuso
n-St
even
s Act
requ
ires N
MFS
to p
rovi
de E
FH c
onse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
enda
tions
whe
n an
act
ivity
is
expe
cted
to a
dver
sely
impa
ct E
FH.
Bas
ed o
n th
is re
quire
men
t, N
MFS
pro
vide
s the
follo
win
g:
EFH
Con
serv
atio
n R
ecom
men
datio
ns
1. A
pla
n sh
all b
e de
velo
ped
for p
rovi
ding
full,
in-k
ind
com
pens
atio
n fo
r una
void
able
adv
erse
im
pact
s to
wet
land
s. T
he p
lan
shal
l add
ress
com
pens
atio
n fo
r los
s of p
rodu
ctiv
ity a
nd h
abita
t fu
nctio
ns th
at o
ccur
dur
ing
the
perio
d be
twee
n el
imin
atio
n/de
grad
atio
n of
exi
stin
g w
etla
nds a
nd
esta
blis
hmen
t of f
unct
iona
lly c
ompa
tible
man
grov
e ha
bita
t tha
t wou
ld b
e pr
otec
ted
in p
erpe
tuity
.Ex
ecut
ion
of th
e ap
prov
ed m
itiga
tion
plan
shal
l be
a re
quire
d co
mpo
nent
of t
he p
roje
ct.
2. A
mon
itorin
g pl
an sh
all b
e de
velo
ped
to a
sses
s the
eco
logi
cal s
ucce
ss o
f the
off
site
, co
mpe
nsat
ory
miti
gatio
n. A
nnua
l mon
itorin
g of
the
miti
gatio
n si
te sh
all t
ake
plac
e fo
r fiv
e ye
ars
follo
win
g co
mpl
etio
n of
the
miti
gatio
n pr
ojec
t. In
the
even
t it i
s det
erm
ined
that
the
impl
emen
ted
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res d
o no
t com
plet
ely
offs
et th
e de
stru
ctio
n of
man
grov
e w
etla
nds,
the
plan
shal
l inc
lude
con
tinge
ncy
mea
sure
s, su
ch a
s add
ition
al p
lant
ing
or e
xotic
ve
geta
tion
rem
oval
, in
orde
r to
prov
ide
func
tiona
lly su
itabl
e re
plac
emen
t hab
itat.
The
m
itiga
tion/
mon
itorin
g pl
an sh
all b
e fo
rwar
ded
to th
e N
MFS
for r
evie
w a
nd a
ppro
val p
rior t
o in
itiat
ion
of c
onst
ruct
ion.
Than
k yo
u fo
r the
opp
ortu
nity
to p
rovi
de c
omm
ents
. R
elat
ed c
orre
spon
denc
e sh
ould
be
dire
cted
to
the
atte
ntio
n of
Ms.
Joce
lyn
Kar
azsi
a at
our
Wes
t Pal
m B
each
off
ice,
whi
ch is
co-
loca
ted
with
th
e U
S En
viro
nmen
tal P
rote
ctio
n A
genc
y at
USE
PA, 4
00 N
orth
Con
gres
s Ave
nue,
Sui
te 1
20,
Wes
t Pal
m B
each
, Flo
rida,
334
01.
She
may
be
reac
hed
by te
leph
one
at (5
61) 6
16-8
880,
ex
tens
ion
207,
or b
y e-
mai
l at J
ocel
yn.K
araz
sia@
noaa
.gov
.
Sinc
erel
y,
/ fo
r Mile
s M. C
room
A
ssis
tant
Reg
iona
l Adm
inis
trato
r
H
abita
t Con
serv
atio
n D
ivis
ion
cc: (
via
elec
troni
c m
ail)
EPA
, WPB
FW
S, V
ero
Bea
ch
Bro
war
d C
ount
y FW
C, T
alla
hass
ee
FDEP
, WPB
SA
FMC
F/SE
R K
eys
F/SE
R3
F/SE
R47
, Kar
azsi
a
TH
IS P
AG
E I
NTEN
TIO
NA
LLY
LEFT B
LA
NK
U.S
. Dep
artm
ent
of T
rans
porta
tion
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
trat
ion
OR
LA
ND
O A
IRPO
RT
S D
IST
RIC
T O
FFIC
E59
50 H
azel
tine
Nat
iona
l Dr.,
Sui
te 4
00
Orla
ndo,
Flo
rida
3282
2-50
24
Phon
e: (4
07) 8
12-6
331
Febr
uary
5, 2
008
Ms.
Joc
elyn
Kar
azsi
a
Nat
iona
l Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s S
ervi
ce
400
Nor
th C
ongr
ess
Ave
nue,
Sui
te 1
20
Wes
t Pal
m B
each
, Flo
rida
3340
1
Re:
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct S
tate
men
t (D
raft
EIS)
Es
sent
ial F
ish
Hab
itat (
EFH
) Ass
essm
ent A
dditi
onal
Info
rmat
ion
Dea
r Ms.
Kar
azsi
a:
Ple
ase
find
encl
osed
the
addi
tiona
l inf
orm
atio
n yo
u re
ques
ted
in y
our
lette
r da
ted
May
17
, 200
7 an
d FA
A’s
resp
onse
to N
atio
nal M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
s’ E
FH C
onse
rvat
ion
Rec
omm
enda
tion.
Th
e FA
A h
as d
eter
min
ed t
he P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
wou
ld n
ot r
esul
t in
si
gnifi
cant
adv
erse
impa
cts
to E
FH o
r si
gnifi
cant
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts
to w
etla
nds
and
EFH
bas
ed o
n th
e pr
opos
ed m
itiga
tion
for
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n an
d m
itiga
tion
that
w
ould
be
requ
ired
for o
ther
pro
ject
s in
the
area
aro
und
FLL.
We
appr
ecia
te y
our
eval
uatio
n of
thi
s in
form
atio
n an
d re
ques
t yo
ur d
eter
min
atio
n th
at
the
cons
ulta
tion
proc
ess
satis
fies
the
Fede
ral
agen
cy c
onsu
ltatio
n re
quire
men
ts o
f S
ectio
n 30
5.
If yo
u ha
ve a
ny q
uest
ions
reg
ardi
ng t
he a
ttach
ed d
ocum
ent
or r
equi
re
addi
tiona
l inf
orm
atio
n, p
leas
e ca
ll m
e at
(407
) 812
-633
1 ex
tens
ion
#129
.
Sin
cere
ly,
Virg
inia
Lan
e, A
.I.C
.P.
Env
ironm
enta
l Spe
cial
ist
Enc
losu
re
Cc:
M
iles
M. C
room
, NM
FS
Virg
inia
Lan
e En
viro
nmen
tal S
peci
alis
t U
.S. D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
tratio
n 59
50 H
azel
tine
Nat
iona
l Driv
e O
rland
o, F
lorid
a 32
822-
5024
Dea
r Ms.
Lane
:
NO
AA
’s N
atio
nal M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies S
ervi
ce (N
MFS
) rev
iew
ed th
e fin
al E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct
Stat
emen
t (EI
S), d
ated
June
17,
200
8, fo
r the
dev
elop
men
t and
ext
ensi
on o
f run
way
9R
/27L
and
ot
her a
ssoc
iate
d pr
ojec
ts a
t For
t Lau
derd
ale-
Hol
lyw
ood
Inte
rnat
iona
l Airp
ort (
FLL)
. Th
e fin
al
EIS
prep
ared
by
the
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
tratio
n (F
AA
) des
crib
es th
e en
viro
nmen
tal
impa
cts a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith a
irpor
t pro
ject
s pro
pose
d by
the
Bro
war
d C
ount
y B
oard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
oner
s (B
row
ard
Cou
nty)
, ow
ner a
nd o
pera
tor o
f FLL
. A
ccor
ding
to th
e fin
al E
IS, t
he
exis
ting
airf
ield
at F
LL la
cks s
uffic
ient
cap
acity
to a
ccom
mod
ate
exis
ting
and
fore
cast
ed
dem
and.
In
orde
r to
addr
ess t
his n
eed,
Bro
war
d C
ount
y pr
opos
es to
: R
edev
elop
Run
way
9R
/27L
to a
leng
th o
f 8,0
00 fe
et a
nd a
wid
th o
f 150
feet
. A
n En
gine
ered
Mat
eria
ls A
rres
ting
Syst
em (E
MA
S) w
ould
be
used
at e
ach
runw
ay e
nd in
pla
ce o
f a st
anda
rd ru
nway
safe
ty a
rea.
The
use
of E
MA
S al
low
s the
ove
rall
leng
th o
f the
runw
ay to
be
redu
ced
to 8
,000
feet
and
wou
ld
elim
inat
e th
e ne
ed fo
r dec
lare
d di
stan
ce w
hile
impr
ovin
g th
e ru
nway
ope
ratio
nal c
apab
ility
. Th
e ea
ster
n en
d of
Run
way
9R
/27L
wou
ld b
e el
evat
ed o
ver t
he F
lorid
a Ea
st C
oast
Rai
lway
and
U.S
. H
ighw
ay 1
. Th
e w
este
rn e
xten
t of t
he ru
nway
wou
ld b
e th
e D
ania
Cut
-Off
Can
al.
Run
way
13
/31
wou
ld b
e pe
rman
ently
clo
sed
to a
ccom
mod
ate
elev
atio
n of
Run
way
9R
/27L
. In
add
ition
th
is a
ltern
ativ
e in
clud
es im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e op
erat
iona
l noi
se a
bate
men
t act
ions
des
crib
ed in
th
e C
ount
y’s A
irfie
ld D
evel
opm
ent P
rogr
am O
bjec
tive
Stat
emen
t(O
ctob
er 2
6, 2
004)
. Th
is se
t of
cha
nges
is re
ferr
ed to
as “
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
” in
the
final
EIS
.
The
final
EIS
pre
sent
s an
anal
ysis
of s
ever
al o
n-si
te a
nd o
ff-s
ite si
te a
ltern
ativ
es, i
n ad
ditio
n to
th
e no
-act
ion
alte
rnat
ive.
The
FA
A d
oes n
ot p
rese
nt a
pre
ferr
ed a
ltern
ativ
e in
the
final
EIS
, ho
wev
er B
row
ard
Cou
nty’
s pre
ferr
ed a
ltern
ativ
e is
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
. Th
is a
ltern
ativ
e w
ould
im
pact
app
roxi
mat
ely
15.4
1 ac
res o
f wet
land
s inc
ludi
ng 3
.05
acre
s of e
stua
rine
emer
gent
ve
geta
tion
(man
grov
es),
whi
ch a
re e
ssen
tial f
ish
habi
tat (
EFH
). O
ther
alte
rnat
ives
(i.e
., A
ltern
ativ
e D
1) c
ould
adv
erse
ly a
ffec
t as m
uch
as 2
1.87
acr
es o
f wet
land
s. T
he a
irpor
t
UN
ITED
STA
TES
DEP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
OM
MER
CE
Nati
on
al O
cean
ic a
nd
Atm
osp
heri
c A
dm
inis
trati
on
NA
TIO
NA
L M
AR
INE
FIS
HE
RIE
S S
ER
VIC
E
Sout
heas
t Reg
iona
l Off
ice
263
13th
Ave
nue
Sout
h St
. Pet
ersb
urg,
Flo
rida
337
01-5
511
(727
) 824
-531
7; F
AX
(727
) 824
-530
0 ht
tp://
sero
.nm
fs.n
oaa.
gov/
July
25,
200
8 F/
SER
4:JK
/pw
- 2
-
expa
nsio
n ac
tiviti
es a
re lo
cate
d in
wat
ers o
f the
Uni
tes S
tate
s adj
acen
t to
the
Dan
ia c
ut-o
ff c
anal
an
d A
tlant
ic In
traco
asta
l Wat
erw
ay (A
IWW
) in
Bro
war
d C
ount
y, F
lorid
a. A
s the
nat
ion’
s fe
dera
l tru
stee
for t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
and
man
agem
ent o
f mar
ine,
est
uarin
e, a
nd a
nadr
omou
s fis
hery
reso
urce
s, th
e fo
llow
ing
com
men
ts a
nd re
com
men
datio
ns a
re p
rovi
ded
purs
uant
to
auth
oriti
es o
f the
Fis
h an
d W
ildlif
e C
oord
inat
ion
Act
and
the
Mag
nuso
n-St
even
s Fis
hery
C
onse
rvat
ion
and
Man
agem
ent A
ct (M
agnu
son-
Stev
ens A
ct).
Con
sulta
tion
His
tory
B
y le
tter d
ated
May
17,
200
7, N
MFS
pro
vide
d th
e FA
A w
ith c
omm
ents
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
in
resp
onse
to th
e dr
aft E
IS.
Plea
se se
e th
is le
tter f
or a
com
plet
e co
nsul
tatio
n hi
stor
y an
d a
desc
riptio
n of
the
habi
tats
des
igna
ted
as E
FH.
In o
ur c
omm
ents
on
the
draf
t EIS
, NM
FS
spec
ifica
lly re
ques
ted
that
the
final
EIS
incl
ude
a fu
ll as
sess
men
t of c
umul
ativ
e ef
fect
s; th
e FA
A
or le
ad fe
dera
l age
ncy’
s vie
ws r
egar
ding
the
effe
cts o
f the
act
ion
on E
FH; a
com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion
plan
; and
Uni
fied
Miti
gatio
n A
sses
smen
t Met
hod
(UM
AM
) sco
res o
f the
miti
gatio
n si
te.
In a
dditi
on, w
e pr
ovid
ed tw
o EF
H c
onse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
enda
tions
: (1
) A p
lan
shal
l be
deve
lope
d fo
r pro
vidi
ng fu
ll, in
-kin
d co
mpe
nsat
ion
for u
navo
idab
le
adve
rse
impa
cts t
o w
etla
nds.
The
pla
n sh
all a
ddre
ss c
ompe
nsat
ion
for l
oss o
f pr
oduc
tivity
and
hab
itat f
unct
ions
that
occ
ur d
urin
g th
e pe
riod
betw
een
elim
inat
ion/
degr
adat
ion
of e
xist
ing
wet
land
s and
est
ablis
hmen
t of f
unct
iona
lly
com
patib
le m
angr
ove
habi
tat t
hat w
ould
be
prot
ecte
d in
per
petu
ity; a
nd
(2) A
mon
itorin
g pl
an sh
all b
e de
velo
ped
to a
sses
s the
eco
logi
cal s
ucce
ss o
f the
off
site
, co
mpe
nsat
ory
miti
gatio
n. A
nnua
l mon
itorin
g of
the
miti
gatio
n si
te sh
all t
ake
plac
e fo
r fiv
e ye
ars f
ollo
win
g co
mpl
etio
n of
the
miti
gatio
n pr
ojec
t. In
the
even
t it i
s det
erm
ined
th
at th
e im
plem
ente
d m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s do
not c
ompl
etel
y of
fset
the
dest
ruct
ion
of
man
grov
e w
etla
nds,
the
plan
shal
l inc
lude
con
tinge
ncy
mea
sure
s, su
ch a
s add
ition
al
plan
ting
or e
xotic
veg
etat
ion
rem
oval
, in
orde
r to
prov
ide
func
tiona
lly su
itabl
e re
plac
emen
t hab
itat.
The
miti
gatio
n/m
onito
ring
plan
shal
l be
forw
arde
d to
the
NM
FS fo
r re
view
and
app
rova
l prio
r to
initi
atio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n.
Res
pons
es to
Info
rmat
ion
Req
uest
s and
EFH
Con
serv
atio
n R
ecom
men
datio
ns
A fu
ll as
sess
men
t of c
umul
ativ
e ef
fect
s. In
our
com
men
ts o
n th
e dr
aft E
IS, w
e no
ted
that
seve
ral
past
, pre
sent
, and
reas
onab
ly fo
rese
eabl
e fu
ture
act
iviti
es w
ere
not i
nclu
ded
in th
e di
scus
sion
of
cum
ulat
ive
effe
cts.
The
fina
l EIS
(cha
pter
7) p
rovi
des a
mor
e th
orou
gh e
valu
atio
n of
cum
ulat
ive
effe
cts.
NM
FS c
oncl
udes
that
this
info
rmat
ion
need
has
bee
n su
ffic
ient
ly a
ddre
ssed
.
The
FAA’
s, or
lead
fede
ral a
genc
y’s,
view
s reg
ardi
ng th
e ef
fect
s of t
he a
ctio
n on
EFH
. Th
e fin
al
EIS
(sec
tion
6.F.
1.7)
stat
es th
at th
e FA
A h
as d
eter
min
ed th
ere
will
be
no si
gnifi
cant
impa
cts t
o EF
H re
sulti
ng fr
om th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of a
ny o
f the
runw
ay d
evel
opm
ent a
ltern
ativ
es.
This
de
term
inat
ion
cons
ider
ed th
e pr
ojec
t des
ign;
the
min
imal
shor
t-ter
m a
nd p
erm
anen
t im
pact
s as
soci
ated
with
the
inst
alla
tion
of li
ght t
ower
foun
datio
ns, u
tility
cab
les,
and
acce
ss ro
ads
requ
ired
for t
he p
ropo
sed
runw
ay a
ppro
ach
light
con
figur
atio
ns; a
nd th
e m
itiga
tion
prop
osed
for
unav
oida
ble
wet
land
impa
cts.
Whi
le w
e be
lieve
that
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n ab
out t
he m
itiga
tion
prop
osal
is n
eede
d (s
ee se
ctio
n be
low
) bef
ore
NM
FS c
ould
agr
ee w
ith th
e FA
A’s
det
erm
inat
ion,
N
MFS
find
s tha
t the
FA
A h
as m
et th
e re
quire
men
t for
mak
ing
a de
term
inat
ion.
- 3
-
A co
mpe
nsat
ory
miti
gatio
n pl
an.
The
final
EIS
incl
udes
con
cept
ual m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s tha
t the
FA
A w
ould
con
side
r as p
art o
f the
pro
pose
d pr
ojec
t or a
ltern
ativ
es (S
ectio
n 6J
).Sp
ecifi
cally
,th
e fin
al E
IS st
ates
that
the
FAA
has
dev
elop
ed c
once
ptua
l wet
land
miti
gatio
n du
ring
this
EIS
pr
oces
s bas
ed o
n in
put f
rom
and
in c
oord
inat
ion
with
the
U.S
. Arm
y C
orps
of E
ngin
eers
, the
So
uth
Flor
ida
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t Dis
trict
, and
the
U.S
. Env
ironm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
Age
ncy.
The
fin
al E
IS a
lso
stat
es th
at it
will
be
Bro
war
d C
ount
y’s r
espo
nsib
ility
to a
pply
for p
erm
its re
quire
d by
thes
e re
gula
tory
age
ncie
s for
the
pref
erre
d al
tern
ativ
e.
Whi
le N
MFS
is fa
mili
ar w
ith th
e re
stor
atio
n pr
opos
ed a
t Wes
t Lak
e Pa
rk a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
Dep
artm
ent o
f the
Arm
y pe
rmit
num
ber 2
002-
0072
(IP-
LAO
), w
e ar
e al
so a
war
e of
oth
er
proj
ects
by
the
Bro
war
d C
ount
y B
oard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
oner
s (su
ch a
s the
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
Expa
nsio
n) th
at p
ropo
se to
use
this
miti
gatio
n as
wel
l. T
he E
FH a
sses
smen
t sho
uld
fully
de
scrib
e ho
w m
angr
ove
impa
cts w
ould
be
miti
gate
d. W
hile
we
agre
e w
ith th
e ge
nera
l app
roac
h of
the
conc
eptu
al p
lan,
mor
e de
tail
is n
eede
d, in
clud
ing
Uni
fied
Miti
gatio
n A
sses
smen
t Met
hod
(UM
AM
) sco
res a
t the
miti
gatio
n si
tes,
to d
eter
min
e th
at a
ll fu
nctio
nal l
osse
s wou
ld b
e m
itiga
ted.
NM
FS c
oncl
udes
that
this
info
rmat
ion
need
has
not
bee
n su
ffic
ient
ly a
ddre
ssed
.
Uni
fied
Miti
gatio
n As
sess
men
t Met
hod
(UM
AM) s
core
s. In
resp
onse
to o
ur re
view
of t
he d
raft
EIS,
NM
FS n
oted
that
the
UM
AM
scor
es fo
r the
wet
land
are
as p
ropo
sed
for i
mpa
ct u
nder
B
row
ard
Cou
nty’
s pre
ferr
ed a
ltern
ativ
e w
ere
prov
ided
. H
owev
er, t
he o
nly
way
to d
eter
min
e th
e am
ount
of m
itiga
tion
nece
ssar
y to
off
set 3
.05
acre
s of m
angr
ove
wet
land
s wou
ld b
e to
hav
e U
MA
M sc
ores
for t
he m
itiga
tion
site
, whi
ch w
ere
not i
nclu
ded
in th
e dr
aft E
IS n
or a
re th
ey
prov
ided
in th
e fin
al E
IS.
The
com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion
plan
shou
ld in
clud
e al
l nec
essa
ry
UM
AM
scor
es to
det
erm
ine
that
all
func
tiona
l los
ses c
an b
e m
itiga
ted.
We
conc
lude
that
this
in
form
atio
n ne
ed h
as n
ot b
een
suff
icie
ntly
add
ress
ed.
EFH
Con
serv
atio
n Re
com
men
datio
ns p
rovi
ded
in re
spon
se to
revi
ew o
f the
dra
ft EI
S. T
he E
FH
asse
ssm
ent s
ectio
n in
the
final
EIS
doe
s not
mak
e an
y re
fere
nce
to th
e EF
H c
onse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
enda
tions
pro
vide
d in
resp
onse
to o
ur re
view
of t
he d
raft
EIS.
As m
entio
ned
abov
e, th
e FA
A m
aint
ains
that
it is
Bro
war
d C
ount
y’s r
espo
nsib
ility
to d
evel
op th
e pe
rmits
for t
he
miti
gatio
n. H
owev
er, t
he E
FH se
ctio
n di
d no
t sum
mar
ize
the
anal
ysis
that
led
the
FAA
to th
is
conc
lusi
on.
Sect
ion
305(
b)(4
)(B
) of t
he M
agnu
son-
Stev
ens A
ct a
nd it
s im
plem
entin
g re
gula
tion
at 5
0 C
FR S
ectio
n 60
0.92
0(k)
requ
ire th
at, i
n th
e ca
se o
f a re
spon
se th
at is
inco
nsis
tent
with
N
MFS
con
serv
atio
n re
com
men
datio
ns, t
he a
genc
y m
ust e
xpla
in it
s rea
sons
for n
ot fo
llow
ing
the
reco
mm
enda
tions
, inc
ludi
ng th
e sc
ient
ific
ratio
nale
for a
ny d
isag
reem
ents
with
NM
FS o
ver t
he
antic
ipat
ed e
ffec
ts o
f the
pro
pose
d ac
tion
and
the
mea
sure
s nee
ded
to o
ffse
t suc
h ef
fect
s. N
MFS
be
lieve
s the
FA
A, a
s the
fede
ral a
ctio
n ag
ency
, is r
espo
nsib
le fo
r doc
umen
ting
that
the
miti
gatio
n w
ould
fully
off
set t
he lo
st w
etla
nd fu
nctio
ns th
roug
h th
e N
atio
nal E
nviro
nmen
tal
Polic
y A
ct p
roce
ss.
In c
losi
ng, N
MFS
can
not
con
clud
e th
at th
e ha
bita
t con
serv
atio
n go
als o
f the
Mag
nuso
n-St
even
s A
ct h
ave
been
met
for t
his p
roje
ct n
or c
an w
e co
nclu
de th
at th
e FA
A h
as m
et th
e pr
oced
ural
re
quire
men
ts o
f the
Mag
nuso
n-St
even
s Act
. W
e m
aint
ain
our r
ecom
men
datio
ns to
dev
elop
a
com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion
plan
and
the
asso
ciat
ed m
onito
ring.
We
wou
ld b
e w
illin
g to
wor
k w
ith
the
FAA
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
hese
pla
ns.
We
also
can
adv
ise
on th
e m
ost e
ffec
tive
path
to
com
plet
ing
the
EFH
con
sulta
tion.
- 4
-
Than
k yo
u fo
r the
opp
ortu
nity
to p
rovi
de c
omm
ents
. R
elat
ed c
orre
spon
denc
e sh
ould
be
dire
cted
to
the
atte
ntio
n of
Ms.
Joce
lyn
Kar
azsi
a at
our
Wes
t Pal
m B
each
off
ice,
whi
ch is
co-
loca
ted
with
th
e U
S En
viro
nmen
tal P
rote
ctio
n A
genc
y at
USE
PA, 4
00 N
orth
Con
gres
s Ave
nue,
Sui
te 1
20,
Wes
t Pal
m B
each
, Flo
rida,
334
01.
She
may
be
reac
hed
by te
leph
one
at (5
61) 6
16-8
880,
ex
tens
ion
207,
or b
y e-
mai
l at J
ocel
yn.K
araz
sia@
noaa
.gov
.
Sinc
erel
y,
/ f
or
Mile
s M. C
room
A
ssis
tant
Reg
iona
l Adm
inis
trato
r
H
abita
t Con
serv
atio
n D
ivis
ion
cc: (
via
elec
troni
c m
ail)
EPA
, Mie
dem
a.R
on@
epa.
gov
FWS,
Pau
l_So
uza@
fws.g
ov
FWC
C, L
isa.
Gre
gg@
MyF
WC
.com
B
row
ard
Cou
nty,
JKR
AW
CZY
K@
brow
ard.
org
SAFM
C, R
oger
.Pug
liese
@sa
fmc.
net
NO
AA
PPI
, ppi
.nep
a@no
aa.g
ov
F/SE
R, D
avid
.Key
s@no
aa.g
ov
F/SE
R3,
Eric
.Haw
k@no
aa.g
ov
F/SE
R4,
Dav
id.D
ale@
noaa
.gov
F/
SER
47, J
ocel
yn.K
araz
sia@
noaa
.gov
O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Off
ice
5950 H
azel
tine
Nat
ional
Dr.
, Suite
400
Orlan
do,
FL 3
2822-5
024
Phone:
407-8
12-6
331
Sep
tem
ber
29,
2008
Joce
lyn K
ara
zsia
, M
.S.
Fish
erie
s Bio
logis
t N
OAA N
atio
nal
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s W
est
Palm
Bea
ch O
ffic
e 400 N
ort
h C
ongre
ss A
venue,
Suite
120
Wes
t Pa
lm B
each
, Fl
orida,
33401
Dea
r M
s. K
araz
sia:
The
FAA pro
vided
an a
sses
smen
t of
Ess
ential
Fis
h H
abitat
(EFH
) in
the
Dra
ft E
IS.
The
NM
FS p
rovi
ded
com
men
ts o
n t
he
Dra
ft E
IS a
nd C
onse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith S
ection 3
05(b
) (4
)(A)
of
the
Mag
nuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
in a
let
ter
to t
he
FAA d
ated
May
17,
2007.1
In
this
May
2007 let
ter,
the
NM
FS a
lso r
eques
ted a
dditio
nal
in
form
atio
n i
n o
rder
to f
ully
eva
luat
e th
e pro
pose
d p
roje
ct.
The
FAA p
rovi
ded
the
additio
nal
info
rmat
ion r
eques
ted b
y N
MFS
and r
esponded
to N
MFS
EFH
Conse
rvat
ion
Rec
om
men
dat
ions
in a
let
ter
dat
ed F
ebru
ary
5,
2008.2
The
FAA d
id n
ot
rece
ive
an
ackn
ow
ledgem
ent
of
the
info
rmat
ion p
rovi
ded
to N
MFS
in F
ebru
ary
2008.
The
FAA r
ecei
ved t
he
NM
SS let
ter
dat
ed J
uly
25,
2008
3,
whic
h c
onta
ined
com
men
ts o
n
the
Final EIS
. I
n t
his
let
ter
NM
FS p
rovi
ded
the
follo
win
g c
om
men
ts.
FAA’s
res
ponse
s to
those
com
men
ts a
re p
rovi
ded
bel
ow
.
NM
FS
Co
mm
en
t 1
: The
FAA d
oes
not
pre
sent
a pre
ferr
ed a
lter
nat
ive
in t
he
final EIS
.
FA
A R
esp
on
se:
The
FAA’s
Pre
ferr
ed A
lter
nat
ive
(Alter
nat
ive
B1b)
is i
den
tified
in t
he
Final
EIS
in C
hap
ter
Eig
ht,
Sec
tion 8
.4,
Iden
tifica
tion o
f FA
A’s
Pre
ferr
ed A
lter
nat
ive.
NM
FS
Co
mm
en
t 2
: Consu
ltation H
isto
ry -
In o
ur
com
men
ts o
n t
he
dra
ft E
IS,
NM
FS
spec
ific
ally
req
ues
ted t
hat
the
final
EIS
incl
ude
a fu
ll as
sess
men
t of
cum
ula
tive
eff
ects
; th
e FA
A o
r le
ad f
eder
al a
gen
cy's
vie
ws
regar
din
g t
he
effe
cts
of
the
action o
n E
FH;
a
com
pen
sato
ry m
itig
ation pla
n;
and U
nifie
d M
itig
atio
n Ass
essm
ent
Met
hod (U
MAM
) sc
ore
s of
the
mitig
atio
n
site
.
In
additio
n,
we
pro
vided
tw
o
EFH
co
nse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
endations.
FA
A R
esp
on
se:
An E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
(EFH
) Ass
essm
ent
was
incl
uded
in t
he
Dra
ft
and F
inal
EIS
in C
hapte
r Six
, Sec
tion F
.1.4
, Ess
ential
Fis
h H
abitat
(EFH
) Ass
essm
ent.
As
reques
ted by
the
Nat
ional
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s Ser
vice
(N
MFS
), th
e FA
A pre
pare
d
1 L
ette
r fr
om
Pa
ul
Wel
ler
for
Mile
s M
. Cro
om
, Ass
ista
nt
Reg
ional
Adm
inis
trat
or,
H
abitat
Conse
rvat
ion
Div
isio
n,
Nat
ional
M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
, to
Virgin
ia L
ane,
FAA O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e, R
E:
F/
SER4:J
K/p
w,
Dat
ed:
May
17 ,
2007.
2 L
ette
r to
Joce
lyn K
araz
sia,
Nat
ional
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s Ser
vice
fro
m V
irgin
ia L
ane,
FAA O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e, D
ated
: F
ebru
ary
5,
2008.
Encl
osu
re D
irec
t, S
econdar
y, a
nd C
um
ula
tive
Effec
ts o
n
Ess
ential
Fis
h H
abitat
, Fe
bru
ary
5,
2008.
3 L
ette
r fr
om
Pa
ul
Wel
ler
for
Mile
s M
. Cro
om
, Ass
ista
nt
Reg
ional
Adm
inis
trat
or,
H
abitat
Conse
rvat
ion
Div
isio
n,
Nat
ional
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s Ser
vice
, to
Vir
gin
ia L
ane,
FAA O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e, R
E:
F/
SER4:J
K/p
w,
Dat
ed:
July
25,
2008.
additio
nal
in
form
atio
n
in
a re
port
D
irec
t,
Sec
ondar
y,
and
Cum
ula
tive
Eff
ects
on
Ess
ential
Fi
sh
Hab
itat
.
This
re
port
in
cluded
as
atta
chm
ent
2.1
-1,
a Conce
ptu
al
Wet
land M
itig
atio
n P
lan.
FAA's
res
ponse
to N
MFS
Conse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions
is
pro
vided
in
Sec
tion
4.0
Sum
mar
y an
d
Res
ponse
s to
N
MFS
Com
men
ts
and
Conse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions
of
this
rep
ort
. T
his
info
rmat
ion w
as p
rovi
ded
to N
MFS
in
Feb
ruar
y 2008.
NM
FS h
as n
ot
ackn
ow
ledged
rec
eipt
of
this
info
rmat
ion.
Thes
e re
port
s an
d a
gen
cy c
oord
inat
ion l
ette
rs a
re p
rovi
ded
in t
he
Final
EIS
in A
ppen
dix
M,
Bio
logic
al R
esourc
es.
FAA’s
res
ponse
s to
NM
FS/E
FH c
om
men
ts o
n t
he
Dra
ft E
IS w
ere
pro
vided
in t
he
Final
EIS
, Appen
dix
P,
Sec
tion 11 Bio
logic
al
Res
ourc
es as
Com
men
t 11.2
, how
ever
th
e re
sponse
was
inco
rrec
t.
The
corr
ecte
d r
esponse
to C
om
men
t 11.2
is
pro
vided
bel
ow
:
The
additio
nal
info
rmat
ion r
eques
ted w
as
pro
vided
to t
he
National
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s Ser
vice
(N
MFS
) vi
a
a le
tter
an
d
atta
chm
ent
from
th
e FA
A
in
Febru
ary
2008.
This
info
rmat
ion i
ncl
uded
a r
eport
title
d D
irec
t, S
econdar
y, a
nd C
um
ula
tive
Eff
ects
on E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
. S
ection 4
.0 o
f th
at r
eport
sum
mar
ized
the
com
men
ts
pro
vided
by
NM
FS a
nd F
AA’s
res
ponse
s in
cludin
g:
— FA
A’s
vie
ws
regar
din
g t
he
effe
cts
of
the
act
ion o
n E
ssen
tial Fi
sh H
abitat
(EFH
) —
FA
A’s
res
ponse
s to
the
EFH
Conse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions
The
Conce
ptu
al
Wet
land
Mitig
atio
n
Plan
incl
uded
th
e es
tim
ated
U
MAM
cr
edits
required
for
the
pro
pose
d p
roje
ct a
nd t
he
estim
ated
man
gro
ve m
itig
ation c
redits
avai
lable
at
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
Thes
e re
port
s ar
e pro
vided
in t
he
Final EIS
, Appen
dix
M,
Bio
logic
al R
esourc
es.
NM
FS
Co
mm
en
t 3
: A
full
ass
essm
ent
of
cum
ula
tive
eff
ects
. T
he
Final
EIS
Chap
ter
7
pro
vides
a m
ore
thoro
ugh e
valu
atio
n o
f cu
mula
tive
effec
ts.
NFM
S c
oncl
udes
that
this
in
form
atio
n n
eed h
as b
een s
uff
icie
ntly
addre
ssed
.
FA
A R
esp
on
se:
Com
men
t note
d.
NM
FS
C
om
men
t 4
:
The
final
EIS
(S
ection
6.F
.1.7
) st
ate
s th
at
the
FAA
has
det
erm
ined
th
ere
will
be
no
signific
ant
impact
s to
EFH
re
sultin
g
from
th
e im
ple
men
tation o
f an
y of
the
runw
ay d
evel
opm
ent
alte
rnat
ives
. W
hile
we
bel
ieve
that
additio
nal
in
form
atio
n ab
out
the
mitig
ation pro
posa
l is
nee
ded
bef
ore
N
MFS
co
uld
ag
ree
with t
he
FAA's
det
erm
inat
ion,
NM
FS f
inds
than
the
FAA h
as
met
the
requirem
ent
for
mak
ing a
det
erm
inat
ion.
FA
A R
esp
on
se:
Com
men
t note
d.
NM
FS
C
om
men
t 5
:
A
com
pen
sato
ry
mitig
ation
pla
n.
The
final
EIS
in
cludes
co
nce
ptu
al m
itig
ation m
easu
res
that
the
FAA w
ould
consi
der
as
par
t of
the
pro
pose
d
pro
ject
or
alte
rnat
ives
(Sec
tion 6
J).
The
EFH
ass
essm
ent
should
fully
des
crib
e how
m
angro
ve i
mpac
ts w
ould
be
mitig
ated
. W
hile
we
agre
e w
ith t
he
gen
eral
appro
ach o
f th
e co
nce
ptu
al p
lan,
more
det
ail
is n
eeded
, in
cludin
g U
nifie
d M
itig
atio
n A
sses
smen
t M
ethod (
UM
AM
) sc
ore
s at
the
mitig
ation s
ites
, to
det
erm
ine
what
all
funct
ional
loss
es
would
be
mitig
ated
.
NM
FS
concl
udes
th
at
this
in
form
ation
nee
d
has
not
bee
n
suff
icie
ntly
addre
ssed
.
FA
A R
esp
on
se:
A co
mpen
sato
ry w
etla
nd m
itig
atio
n pla
n fo
r th
e FA
A’s
Pr
efer
red
Alter
native
is
pro
vided
in t
he
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan p
rovi
ded
in t
he
Final
EIS
, Appen
dix
M B
iolo
gic
al
Res
ourc
es.
The
wet
land m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
dis
cuss
ed i
n
Sec
tion 6
J of
the
Dra
ft E
IS a
nd F
inal
EIS
docu
men
ts p
rovi
ded
a g
ener
al m
itig
atio
n
stra
tegy
for
wet
land i
mpac
ts.
More
det
aile
d c
once
ptu
al w
etla
nd m
itig
atio
n f
or
the
FAA’s
Pr
efer
red Alter
nat
ive
was
dis
cuss
ed in
th
e Fi
nal
EIS
in
Chap
ter
Eig
ht,
FA
A's
Pr
efer
red
Alter
native
, Sec
tion
8.6
.3
and
in
the
Final
EIS
, Appen
dix
M
Bio
logic
al
Res
ourc
es,
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan.
The
UM
AM
Funct
ional
Gai
n c
redit s
core
s fo
r th
e W
est
Lake
Park
mitig
ation p
roje
ct a
re
refe
rence
d in t
he
United
Sta
tes
Arm
y C
orp
s of
Engin
eers
(U
SACE)
Perm
it N
um
ber
SAJ-
2002-0
0072 a
nd S
outh
Flo
rida
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t D
istr
ict
(SFW
MD
) Pe
rmit N
um
ber
06 0
4016 P
. T
he
estim
ated
UM
AM
cre
dits
required
for
the
pro
pose
d p
roje
ct a
nd t
he
estim
ated
man
gro
ve m
itig
ation c
redits
availa
ble
at
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
are
pro
vided
in t
he
Final
EIS
in
Appen
dix
M
.3,
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
ation Pl
an.
See
Tab
le 3.3
-1
Pote
ntial
Wet
land I
mpac
ts f
or
the
Propose
d A
ctio
n (
Alter
native
B1c)
and T
able
4-1
Est
imate
d m
angro
ve M
itig
ation C
redits
Ava
ilable
at
Wes
t La
ke P
ark.
NM
FS
Co
mm
en
t 6
: U
nifie
d M
itig
atio
n A
sses
smen
t M
ethod (
UM
AM
) sc
ore
s.
The
only
w
ay t
o d
eter
min
e th
e am
ount
of
mitig
ation n
eces
sary
to o
ffse
t 3.0
5 a
cres
of
man
gro
ve
wet
lands
would
be
to hav
e U
MAM
sc
ore
s fo
r th
e m
itig
atio
n si
te,
whic
h w
ere
not
incl
uded
in t
he
dra
ft E
IS n
or
are
they
pro
vided
in t
he
final
EIS
. T
he
com
pen
sato
ry
mitig
ation
pla
n
should
in
clude
all
nec
essa
ry
UM
AM
sc
ore
s to
det
erm
ine
that
al
l fu
nct
ional
loss
es c
an b
e m
itig
ate
d.
We
concl
ude
that
this
info
rmation n
eed h
as
not
bee
n s
uff
icie
ntly
addre
ssed
.
FA
A R
esp
on
se:
See
the
FAA R
esponse
to C
om
men
t 5 a
bove
.
NM
FS
Co
mm
en
t 7
: E
FH C
onse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions
pro
vided
in r
esponse
to
revi
ew o
f th
e dra
ft E
IS.
The
EFH
ass
essm
ent
sect
ion i
n t
he
final
EIS
does
not
mak
e an
y re
fere
nce
to t
he
EFH
conse
rvat
ion r
ecom
men
dat
ions
pro
vided
in t
he
resp
onse
to
our
revi
ew
of
the
dra
ft
EIS
.
The
FAA
mai
nta
ins
that
it
is
Bro
war
d
County
's
resp
onsi
bili
ty t
o d
evel
op t
he
per
mits
for
the
mitig
atio
n,
but
the
EFH
sec
tion d
id n
ot
sum
mar
ize
the
anal
ysis
that
led
the
FAA t
o t
his
concl
usi
on.
FA
A
Resp
on
se:
As
note
d
in
FAA
Res
ponse
2
above
, FA
A's
re
sponse
to
N
MFS
Conse
rvat
ion
Rec
om
men
dat
ions
is
pro
vided
in
th
e re
port
D
irec
t,
Sec
ondar
y,
and
Cum
ula
tive
Eff
ects
on E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
, Sec
tion 4
.0 S
um
mar
y an
d R
esponse
s to
N
MFS
Com
men
ts a
nd E
FH C
onse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions.
This
rep
ort
was
pro
vided
to
NM
FS in F
ebru
ary
2008.
The
FAA
has
fu
lly
consi
der
ed
the
NM
FS
EFH
Conse
rvat
ion
Rec
om
men
dat
ions
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith t
he
requirem
ents
of
Sec
tion 3
05(b
)(4)(
B)
of
the
Mag
nuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
. C
onsi
sten
t w
ith t
he
NM
FS E
FH C
onse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions,
a C
once
ptu
al
Wet
land M
itig
atio
n P
lan t
o c
om
pen
sate
for
unav
oid
able
im
pact
s to
wet
lands
and E
FH is
pro
vided
in t
he
Final
EIS
, Appen
dix
M B
iolo
gic
al
Res
ourc
es.
The
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd
Mitig
ation P
lan r
efer
ence
s a
monitoring p
lan f
or
the
ecolo
gic
al s
ucc
ess
of
the
off
-site
com
pen
sato
ry
mitig
ation
as
des
crib
ed
in
Sec
tion
Five
of
the
Conce
ptu
al
Wet
land
Mitig
ation
Plan
.
Furt
her
re
finem
ent
of
the
Conce
ptu
al
Mitig
atio
n
Plan
an
d
the
monitoring p
lan a
re t
o b
e ad
dre
ssed
by
Bro
ward
County
and t
he
USAC
E d
uring t
he
Sec
tion 4
04 p
erm
itting p
roce
ss.
The
FAA ca
nnot
subm
it or
obta
in per
mits
bec
ause
th
e FA
A is
not
the
applic
ant.
The
applic
ant
for
per
mits
in
this
ca
se
is
Bro
war
d
County
, th
e Air
port
Sponso
r.
Ther
efore
, Bro
ward
County
w
ill
apply
fo
r an
y re
quired
per
mits.
The
Conce
ptu
al
Wet
land
Mitig
ation
Plan
co
nta
ins
a dis
cuss
ion
of
the
wet
land
per
mitting
pro
cess
.
Bro
ward
County
as
a c
onditio
n o
f th
e FA
A’s
Rec
ord
of
Dec
isio
n (
RO
D)
will
be
required
to
obta
in a
ny
nec
essa
ry p
erm
its.
Bro
war
d C
ounty
has
pro
vided
a let
ter
indic
atin
g t
hei
r co
mm
itm
ent
to i
mple
men
t th
e w
etla
nd m
itig
ation t
hat
would
be
required
for
pro
ject
im
pac
ts.4
NM
FS
Co
mm
en
t 8
: T
he
NM
FS c
an n
ot
concl
ude
that
the
hab
itat
conse
rvat
ion g
oal
s of
the
Mag
nuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
hav
e bee
n m
et f
or
this
pro
ject
nor
can w
e co
ncl
ude
that
the
FAA h
as m
et t
he
pro
cedura
l re
quirem
ents
of th
e M
agnuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
.
FA
A R
esp
on
se:
Coord
inat
ion w
ith N
MFS
was
conduct
ed t
hro
ughout
the
EIS
pro
cess
to
id
entify
an
d docu
men
t pote
ntial
im
pact
s an
d m
itig
atio
n opport
unitie
s. The
FAA
resp
onded
to
an
d addre
ssed
N
MFS
/EFH
co
mm
ents
on th
e D
raft
EIS
an
d pro
vided
re
sponse
s to
the
NM
FS C
onse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions,
in F
ebru
ary
2008.
We
are
agai
n pro
vidin
g co
pie
s of
the
refe
rence
d re
port
s: D
irec
t, Sec
ondar
y, an
d
Cum
ula
tive
Eff
ects
on E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
; Fe
bru
ary
5,
2008;
atta
ched
to t
his
rep
ort
as
att
achm
ent
2.1
-1,
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan,
Januar
y 24,
2008.
The
FAA w
ould
appre
ciat
e a
resp
onse
to t
his
let
ter
as
soon a
s poss
ible
bec
ause
we
are
close
to c
om
ple
ting t
he
EIS
pro
cess
. T
han
k yo
u.
Sin
cere
ly,
Virgin
ia L
ane,
AIC
P Envi
ronm
enta
l Spec
ialis
t O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e
cc:
(via
ele
ctro
nic
mai
l)
NM
FS,
Mile
s.Cro
om
@noaa
.gov
EPA
, M
iedem
a.Ron@
epa.
gov
FWS,
Paul_
Souza
@fw
s.gov
FWCC,
Lisa
.Gre
gg@
MyF
WC.c
om
Bro
ward
County
, JK
RAW
CZYK@
bro
war
d.o
rg
SAFM
C,
Roger
.Puglie
se@
safm
c.net
N
OAA P
PI,
ppi.nep
a@
noaa
.gov
F/SER,
Davi
d.K
eys@
noaa
.gov
F/SER3,
Eric.
Haw
k@noaa
.gov
F/SER4,
Dav
id.D
ale@
noaa
.gov
USACE,
Leah
.A.O
ber
lin@
usa
ce.a
rmy.
mil
4 L
ette
r fr
om
Mar
c G
ambrill,
Bro
war
d C
ounty
Avi
atio
n D
epar
tmen
t, t
o V
irgin
ia L
ane,
FAA O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e, D
ated
D
ecem
ber
4,
2007.
U.S
. Dep
artm
ent
of T
rans
porta
tion
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
trat
ion
OR
LA
ND
O A
IRPO
RT
S D
IST
RIC
T O
FFIC
E59
50 H
azel
tine
Nat
iona
l Dr.,
Sui
te 4
00
Orla
ndo,
Flo
rida
3282
2-50
24
Phon
e: (4
07) 8
12-6
331
Febr
uary
5, 2
008
Ms.
Joc
elyn
Kar
azsi
a N
atio
nal M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
40
0 N
orth
Con
gres
s A
venu
e, S
uite
120
W
est P
alm
Bea
ch, F
lorid
a 33
401
Re:
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct S
tate
men
t (D
raft
EIS)
Es
sent
ial F
ish
Hab
itat (
EFH
) Ass
essm
ent A
dditi
onal
Info
rmat
ion
Dea
r Ms.
Kar
azsi
a:
Ple
ase
find
encl
osed
the
addi
tiona
l inf
orm
atio
n yo
u re
ques
ted
in y
our
lette
r da
ted
May
17
, 200
7 an
d FA
A’s
resp
onse
to N
atio
nal M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
s’ E
FH C
onse
rvat
ion
Rec
omm
enda
tion.
Th
e FA
A h
as d
eter
min
ed t
he P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
wou
ld n
ot r
esul
t in
si
gnifi
cant
adv
erse
impa
cts
to E
FH o
r si
gnifi
cant
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts
to w
etla
nds
and
EFH
bas
ed o
n th
e pr
opos
ed m
itiga
tion
for
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n an
d m
itiga
tion
that
w
ould
be
requ
ired
for o
ther
pro
ject
s in
the
area
aro
und
FLL.
We
appr
ecia
te y
our
eval
uatio
n of
thi
s in
form
atio
n an
d re
ques
t yo
ur d
eter
min
atio
n th
at
the
cons
ulta
tion
proc
ess
satis
fies
the
Fede
ral
agen
cy c
onsu
ltatio
n re
quire
men
ts o
f S
ectio
n 30
5.
If yo
u ha
ve a
ny q
uest
ions
reg
ardi
ng t
he a
ttach
ed d
ocum
ent
or r
equi
re
addi
tiona
l inf
orm
atio
n, p
leas
e ca
ll m
e at
(407
) 812
-633
1 ex
tens
ion
#129
.
Sin
cere
ly,
Virg
inia
Lan
e, A
.I.C
.P.
Env
ironm
enta
l Spe
cial
ist
Enc
losu
re
Cc:
M
iles
M. C
room
, NM
FS
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive
Eff
ect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
U.S
. D
ep
art
men
t o
f Tra
nsp
ort
ati
on
Fed
era
l A
via
tio
n A
dm
inis
trati
on
Pro
po
sed
Exp
an
sio
n o
f R
un
way 9
R-2
7L
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rtEn
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
Sta
tem
en
t
Pre
pare
d f
or:
N
ati
on
al M
ari
ne F
ish
eri
es
Serv
ice
Prep
are
d f
or
the
FAA b
y:
SW
C (
San
dra
Walter
s Consu
ltants
, In
c.)
6410 F
ifth
Str
eet,
Suite
3
Key
Wes
t, F
L 33040
Febru
ary
5,
2008
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
TA
BLE O
F C
ON
TEN
TS
Sect
ion
D
esc
rip
tio
n
Pag
e
1.0
In
troduct
ion
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
.
1
1.1
G
ener
al P
roje
ct D
escr
iption f
or
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n..
.
1
2.0
Ass
essm
ent
of Im
pac
ts t
o E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
....
....
....
....
2
2.1
D
irec
t Eff
ects
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
...
2
2.2
Sec
ondar
y Eff
ects
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
.
3
2.3
Tota
l D
irec
t an
d S
econdar
y Eff
ects
....
....
....
....
....
....
..
4
2.4
Conce
ptu
al M
itig
atio
n for
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n I
mpac
ts
to E
FH..
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
..
5
2.5
Cum
ula
tive
Eff
ects
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
5
3.0
Concl
usi
on
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
...
8
4.0
Sum
mar
y an
d R
esponse
s to
NM
FS C
om
men
ts
an
d C
onse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions..
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
..
9
LIS
T O
F T
AB
LES
N
o.
Desc
rip
tio
n
Pag
e
2.1
.1-1
Alter
nat
ive
B1c
Impac
ts t
o W
etla
nd H
abitat
Des
ignat
ed a
s EFH
5
2.4
-1
Sum
mar
y Anal
ysis
of
Cum
ula
tive
Im
pact
s to
Wet
lands
and E
FH
6
LIS
T O
F A
TTA
CH
ME
NTS
N
o*
. D
esc
rip
tio
n
# o
f P
ag
es
2.1
-1
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan..
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
56
2.1
.1-1
Im
pac
ts t
o W
etla
nds
from
the
B1b/c
Alter
nat
ive
....
....
....
....
1
*
Note
: T
able
s an
d a
ttac
hm
ents
are
num
ber
ed c
orr
espondin
g w
ith t
he
EFH
Ass
essm
ent
sect
ion in w
hic
h t
hey
are
loca
ted.
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
1.0
INTR
OD
UC
TIO
N
This
re
port
an
alyz
es pote
ntial
ef
fect
s—in
cludin
g pote
ntial
direc
t, se
condar
y, an
d
cum
ula
tive
ef
fect
s—of
the
Propose
d
Act
ion,
expansi
on
of
Runw
ay
9R-2
7L
and
asso
ciate
d a
ctio
ns
at t
he
Fort
Lau
der
dal
e-H
olly
wood I
nte
rnat
ional
Airport
(FL
L) o
n
Ess
ential
Fi
sh H
abitat
(E
FH)
regula
ted by
the
National
M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
(N
MFS
).
This
re
port
al
so
incl
udes
th
e co
nce
ptu
al
mitig
atio
n
pla
n
for
any
unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts t
o w
etla
nds
des
ignat
ed a
s EFH
that
could
pote
ntial
ly r
esult
from
the
Propose
d A
ctio
n.
The
Feder
al A
viat
ion A
dm
inis
trat
ion (
FAA)
publis
hed
a D
raft
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pac
t Sta
tem
ent
(Dra
ft E
IS)
for
the
dev
elopm
ent
and e
xpansi
on o
f Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L
at F
LL
in M
arch
2007.
The
Dra
ft E
IS c
onta
ined
an E
FH a
sses
smen
t in
acc
ord
ance
with
50 C
FR S
ection 6
00.9
20(e
) fo
r th
e Air
port
Sponso
r’s
Propose
d P
roje
ct a
nd o
ther
al
tern
ativ
es.
Of
the
alte
rnat
ives
consi
der
ed,
Alter
nat
ive
B1c1
is
the
focu
s of
this
re
port
bec
ause
it is
th
e Airport
Sponso
r’s
Propose
d Pr
oje
ct an
d,
ther
efore
, th
e Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n.
The
NM
FS has
co
mm
ente
d on th
e in
form
atio
n co
nta
ined
in
th
e D
raft
EIS
an
d
pro
vided
EFH
conse
rvat
ion r
ecom
men
dations
for
consi
der
atio
n b
y th
e FA
A.
The
NM
FS has
al
so re
ques
ted ad
ditio
nal
in
form
atio
n fr
om
th
e FA
A in
ord
er to
fu
lly
eval
uat
e th
e Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n.2
The
additio
nal
info
rmat
ion r
eques
ted b
y N
MFS
is
incl
uded
in t
his
rep
ort
.
1.1
G
EN
ER
AL P
RO
JEC
T D
ES
CR
IPTIO
N F
OR
TH
E P
RO
PO
SED
A
CTIO
N
The
Propose
d A
ctio
n w
ould
red
evel
op R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L
to a
len
gth
of
8,0
00 f
eet
and
a w
idth
of
150 f
eet.
An E
ngin
eere
d M
ate
rial
Arr
esting S
yste
m (
EM
AS)
would
be
use
d a
t ea
ch r
unw
ay e
nd i
n p
lace
of
a st
andar
d R
unw
ay S
afet
y Are
a (R
SA).
The
east
end o
f Runw
ay
9R/2
7L
would
be
elev
ated
ove
r th
e Fl
orida
Eas
t C
oas
t (F
EC)
Rai
lway
and U
S H
ighw
ay 1
. The
wes
tern
ext
ent
of
the
runw
ay w
ould
be
the
Dan
ia
Cut-
Off
Can
al.
Runw
ay
13/3
1
would
be
per
man
ently
close
d
to
acc
om
modate
el
evation o
f Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L.
As
dis
cuss
ed in t
he
Dra
ft E
IS,
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n a
nd a
lter
nat
ives
wer
e dev
eloped
to
avo
id a
nd m
inim
ize
direc
t im
pac
ts t
o w
etla
nds
to t
he
exte
nt
pra
ctic
able
. I
n
Dec
ember
2003,
the
Bro
war
d
County
Com
mis
sion
appro
ved
a m
odifie
d
south
ru
nw
ay e
xpan
sion w
hic
h w
as t
o s
tay
within
the
confines
of
7th A
venue
on t
he
east
si
de
of
the
Airport
. T
he
inte
nt
of
this
Com
mis
sion a
ctio
n w
as
to l
imit i
mpac
ts t
o
wet
lands
loca
ted t
o t
he
east
of
7th A
venue
on t
he
east
sid
e of
the
Airport
.3
In
1
The
airf
ield
geo
met
ry,
NAVAID
s, a
nd p
ote
ntial
fac
ility
im
pac
ts f
or
Alter
nat
ive
B1b a
nd B
1c
are
iden
tica
l.
Alter
nat
ive
B1c
incl
udes
oper
atio
nal
res
tric
tions
spec
ifie
d i
n t
he
Inte
rloca
l ag
reem
ents
.
Bro
war
d C
ounty
’s P
refe
rred
Alter
nat
ive
is A
lter
nat
ive
B1c
and t
he
Propose
d A
ctio
n.
2
Lett
er f
rom
Mile
s M
. Cro
om
, Ass
ista
nt
Reg
ional
Adm
inis
trat
or,
Hab
itat
Conse
rvat
ion D
ivis
ion,
U.S
. D
epar
tmen
t of
Com
mer
ce,
Nat
ional
O
cean
ic an
d Atm
osp
her
ic Adm
inis
trat
ion,
Nat
ional
M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
, to
Virgin
ia L
ane,
Envi
ronm
enta
l Spec
ialis
t, F
AA O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e,
dat
ed M
ay 1
7,
2007.
3
Bro
war
d
County
Avi
atio
n
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
ember
12,
2003
Lett
er
from
Tom
Ja
rgie
llo,
Act
ing
Dir
ecto
r of Avi
atio
n,
to D
ean S
trin
ger
, M
anag
er F
AA O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e.
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
additio
n,
Bro
war
d C
ounty
has
com
mitte
d t
o t
he
use
of
a m
odifie
d r
unw
ay a
ppro
ach
lig
ht
syst
em f
or
the
Propose
d A
ctio
n.
This
modifie
d r
unw
ay a
ppro
ach
lig
ht
syst
em
avoid
s en
croac
hm
ent
of
the
Dania
Cut-
Off
Can
al a
nd t
he
adja
cent
tria
ngula
r m
arin
e w
ater
body
on t
he
wes
t en
d o
f th
e ru
nw
ay.
The
modifie
d r
unw
ay a
ppro
ach l
ight
syst
em w
ould
als
o pre
vent
the
encr
oac
hm
ent
of
Wes
t La
ke Pa
rk an
d re
duce
s im
pac
ts t
o w
etla
nds
on t
he
east
end o
f th
e ru
nw
ay.
Alter
native
B1c
incl
udes
the
follo
win
g e
lem
ents
:
�Exp
and a
nd e
leva
te R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L
to a
n o
vera
ll le
ngth
of
8,0
00 f
eet
and w
idth
of
150 f
eet
�Const
ruct
a n
ew f
ull-
length
para
llel
taxi
way
75 f
eet
wid
e on t
he
nort
h s
ide
of
Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L
with s
epar
atio
n o
f 400 fee
t fr
om
9R/2
7L
�Const
ruct
an
oute
r dual
par
alle
l ta
xiw
ay
that
w
ould
be
separ
ated
fr
om
th
e pro
pose
d n
ort
h s
ide
par
alle
l ta
xiw
ay b
y 276 f
eet
�Const
ruct
connec
ting t
axiw
ays
fro
m t
he
pro
pose
d f
ull-
length
par
alle
l ta
xiw
ay t
o
exis
ting t
axi
way
s
�Const
ruct
an I
nst
rum
ent
Landin
g S
yste
m (
ILS)
for
landin
gs
on r
unw
ays
9R a
nd
27L.
Runw
ay e
nds
9R a
nd 2
7L
would
hav
e a
Cat
egory
I I
LS,
whic
h i
ncl
udes
a
Med
ium
Inte
nsi
ty A
ppro
ach L
ight
Sys
tem
with r
unw
ay a
lignm
ent
indic
ator
lights
(M
ALS
R),
loca
lizer
, an
d g
lides
lope
ante
nnae
.
�D
ecom
mis
sion R
unw
ay 1
3/3
1
�Red
evel
op t
erm
inal gat
es
The
follo
win
g c
onnec
ted a
ctio
ns
would
be
nec
essa
ry:
�Clo
se A
irport
Per
imet
er R
oad
loca
ted w
ithin
the
appro
ach t
o R
unw
ay 9
R
�Rel
oca
te A
irport
Surv
eilla
nce
Radar
9 (
ASR-9
)
�Acq
uire
all
or
a port
ion o
f th
e H
ilton F
ort
Lau
der
dal
e-H
olly
wood A
irport
Hote
l (f
orm
erly
the
Wyn
dham
) lo
cate
d a
t 1870 G
riff
in R
oad F
ort
Lau
der
dal
e, F
lorida t
o
acco
mm
odat
e a
port
ion o
f th
e ex
isting s
truct
ure
that
would
be
loca
ted w
ithin
the
Pro
pose
d R
unw
ay P
rote
ctio
n Z
one
(RPZ
) fo
r ex
tended
Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L
�Pa
rtia
l dis
pla
cem
ent
of
the
Jet
Cen
ter
faci
litie
s due
to p
ote
ntial
use
of
a t
axiw
ay
as a
tem
pora
ry r
unw
ay d
uring c
onst
ruct
ion o
f th
e Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n
�Fu
ll dis
pla
cem
ent
of
the
Gulfst
ream
Airw
ays
airc
raft
mai
nte
nan
ce f
aci
litie
s due
to p
ote
ntial
use
of
a ta
xiw
ay
as a
tem
pora
ry r
unw
ay
during c
onst
ruct
ion o
f th
e Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
2.0
AS
SES
SM
EN
T O
F I
MP
AC
TS
TO
ES
SEN
TIA
L F
ISH
H
AB
ITA
T
2.1
DIR
EC
T E
FFEC
TS
The
EFH
within
the
Det
aile
d S
tudy
Are
a4 p
ote
ntial
ly a
ffec
ted b
y th
e Pr
opose
d A
ctio
n
incl
udes
est
uar
ine
scru
b/s
hru
b (
man
gro
ve a
nd m
angro
ve f
ringe)
wet
lands
that
are
hyd
rolo
gic
ally
-connec
ted t
o t
he
Dan
ia C
ut-
Off
Can
al a
nd a
re l
oca
ted t
o t
he
east
of
Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L.
Spec
ies
manag
ed b
y th
e South
Atlan
tic
Fish
erie
s M
anag
emen
t Counci
l (S
AFM
C)
that
could
poss
ibly
utiliz
e th
is h
abitat
as
part
of
thei
r lif
e his
tories
in
clude
pen
aeid
sh
rim
p,
red dru
m,
snap
per
-gro
uper
co
mple
x, an
d oth
er aq
uat
ic
spec
ies.
The
follo
win
g s
ection d
iscu
sses
im
pact
s to
thes
e w
etla
nds
des
ignat
ed a
s EFH
(W
-17c,
W
-25a,
and W
-25b)
that
co
uld
occ
ur
with im
ple
men
tation of
the
Propose
d A
ctio
n.
For
a fu
ll ass
essm
ent
of
all
wet
lands
pote
ntial
ly a
ffec
ted b
y th
e Pr
opose
d A
ctio
n,
in a
dditio
n t
o w
etla
nds
des
ignat
ed a
s EFH
, re
fer
to A
ttach
men
t 2
.1-1
,C
once
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan.
2.1
.1
Dir
ect
Im
pact
s to
Wetl
an
ds
Desi
gn
ate
d a
s EFH
An A
rcVie
w G
eogra
phic
Info
rmat
ion s
yste
ms
(GIS
) pro
gra
m w
as u
sed t
o c
alcu
late
to
tal
wet
land im
pact
ac
res
bas
ed on th
e lim
its
of
dis
turb
ance
. The
limits
of
dis
turb
ance
id
entify
th
e fo
otp
rint
of
the
area
th
at
would
be
dis
turb
ed
during
const
ruct
ion a
ctiv
itie
s.
See
Att
ach
men
t 2
.1.1
-1,
Impac
ts t
o W
etla
nds
from
the
B1b/c
Alter
nat
ive,
for
a gra
phic
dep
iction o
f th
e pro
pose
d lim
its
of
dis
turb
ance
and
the
tota
l direc
t im
pact
s to
wet
lands
that
would
res
ult f
rom
the
const
ruct
ion o
f th
e Pr
opose
d A
ctio
n.
Uniform
Mitig
atio
n A
sses
smen
t M
ethod (
UM
AM
) fu
nct
ional
loss
(F
L)
score
s w
ere
calc
ula
ted
for
each
w
etla
nd
impac
t.
Thes
e FL
sc
ore
s are
eq
uiv
alen
t to
the
UM
AM
funct
ional
gai
n (
FG)
cred
its
nee
ded
for
mitig
atio
n.
The
UM
AM
sco
re s
hee
ts f
or
impac
ts t
o w
etla
nds
from
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n a
re i
ncl
uded
in
Att
ach
men
t 2
.1-1
,Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan.
Direc
t im
pac
ts o
f 2.6
7 a
cres
to W
-17c,
0.2
0 a
cres
to W
-25a,
and 0
.18 a
cres
to W
-25b w
ould
res
ult f
rom
fill
, er
osi
on,
sedim
enta
tion,
and t
he
clea
ring o
f ve
get
ation
asso
ciate
d w
ith t
he
inst
alla
tion o
f th
e ru
nw
ay a
ppro
ach l
ights
and t
he
asso
ciate
d
acce
ss r
oad t
o t
he
east
of
Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L.
Thes
e direc
t w
etla
nd i
mpact
s w
ould
re
sult i
n a
com
bin
ed t
ota
l of
5.6
3 U
MAM
FG
cre
dits
nee
ded
for
mitig
atio
n (
see
Tab
le 2
.3-1
, bel
ow
).
The
runw
ay a
ppro
ach lig
ht
syst
em a
t th
e w
este
rn e
nd o
f Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L
would
be
const
ruct
ed b
y in
stal
ling c
able
s under
the
Dan
ia C
ut-
Off
Can
al t
o a
void
im
pac
ts t
o
the
canal
and a
dja
cent
tria
ngula
r w
ater
body.
Thes
e ca
ble
s w
ould
be
inst
alle
d u
sing
direc
tional
drilli
ng or
a co
mpar
able
m
ethod w
hic
h av
oid
s im
pac
ts to
th
e ca
nal
bott
om
as
wel
l as
the
asso
ciate
d a
quat
ic h
abitat
adja
cent
to a
nd w
ithin
the
canal.
A d
etai
led d
escr
iption o
f th
e in
stal
lation o
f th
e ap
pro
ach l
ight
syst
em t
o s
upport
Runw
ay 9
R/2
7L
is i
ncl
uded
in A
ttach
men
t 2
.1-1
,Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n
Plan
.
4
Det
aile
d S
tudy
Are
a is
def
ined
for
the
purp
ose
s of
the
FLL
EIS
as
the
area
within
whic
h p
hys
ical
im
pac
ts c
ould
occ
ur
from
any
eval
uat
ed p
roje
ct a
lter
nat
ive.
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
2.2
SEC
ON
DA
RY
EFFEC
TS
2.2
.1
Seco
nd
ary
Im
pact
s to
Wetl
an
ds
Desi
gn
ate
d a
s EFH
In ad
ditio
n to
direc
t im
pac
ts,
the
FAA as
sess
ed pote
ntial
se
condary
im
pac
ts to
w
etla
nds
des
ignat
ed
as
EFH
th
at
could
occ
ur
with
the
imple
men
tation
of
the
Propose
d Act
ion.
A se
condary
w
etla
nd im
pact
w
as gen
eral
ly ass
um
ed to
be
a dec
rease
in v
alue
to w
etla
nds
occ
urr
ing w
ithin
25 f
eet
due
to c
lose
pro
xim
ity
to
dis
turb
ed a
reas
5.
The
Propose
d A
ctio
n c
ould
res
ult i
n p
oss
ible
sec
ondary
im
pact
s to
0.3
9 a
cres
of
W-2
5a
and 0
.41 a
cres
of
W-2
5b d
ue
to t
hei
r cl
ose
pro
xim
ity
to t
he
appro
ach
lig
ht
syst
em co
rrid
or
limits
of
dis
turb
ance
(s
ee T
ab
le 2
.3-1
, bel
ow
).
Thes
e im
pac
ts w
ould
res
ult in 0
.77 c
om
bin
ed F
G c
redits
nee
ded
for
mitig
atio
n.
For
det
ails
on t
he
met
hodolo
gy
use
d t
o a
sses
s se
condar
y im
pac
ts t
o w
etla
nds
for
the
Propose
d Act
ion as
w
ell
as figure
s sh
ow
ing th
e lim
its
of
seco
ndary
im
pac
ts to
w
etla
nds,
ple
ase
refe
r to
Att
ach
men
t 2
.1-1
,C
once
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
ation P
lan.
2.2
.2O
ther
Seco
nd
ary
Eff
ect
s
Oth
er
seco
ndar
y ef
fect
s to
EFH
re
sultin
g
from
co
nst
ruct
ion
activi
ties
co
uld
pote
ntial
ly o
ccur
from
the follo
win
g:
�Tem
pora
ry d
istu
rban
ce a
nd d
ispla
cem
ent
of
fish
spec
ies,
�In
crea
sed s
edim
ent
load
s an
d t
urb
idity
in t
he
wat
er c
olu
mn,
�Tem
pora
ry loss
of fo
od ite
ms
to fis
her
ies,
and
�Li
mited
dis
ruption o
r des
truct
ion o
f liv
e bott
om
hab
itat
s.
Eff
ects
would
be
tem
pora
ry a
nd w
ould
be
off
set
by
spec
ial co
nst
ruct
ion t
echniq
ues
and/o
r en
viro
nm
enta
l pro
tect
ion g
uid
elin
es,
incl
udin
g t
he
use
of
Bes
t M
anag
emen
t Pr
actice
s (B
MPs
) as
reco
mm
ended
by
the
U.S
. Envi
ronm
enta
l Pr
ote
ctio
n A
gen
cy’s
(U
SEPA
’s)
Nat
ional
Po
llution D
isch
arge
Elim
inat
ion Sys
tem
(N
PD
ES)
storm
wate
r per
mit f
or
const
ruct
ion a
ctiv
itie
s, F
AA A
dvi
sory
Circu
lar
150/5
370-1
0B,
Sta
ndar
ds
for
Spec
ifyi
ng Const
ruct
ion of
Airport
s, an
d Sea
Turt
le an
d Sm
allt
ooth
Saw
fish
Const
ruct
ion Conditio
ns
as pro
vided
by
NM
FS,
as w
ell
as an
y Sta
te an
d lo
cal
requirem
ents
. The
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
thes
e BM
Ps in
pro
tect
ing bio
tic
and hum
an
hea
lth
from
su
rface
w
ater
deg
radat
ion
would
be
asse
ssed
th
rough
monitoring
pro
gra
ms
asso
ciate
d w
ith r
equired
per
mits.
2.3
TO
TA
L D
IREC
T A
ND
SEC
ON
DA
RY
EFFEC
TS
Tab
le 2
.3-1
bel
ow
pro
vides
a s
um
mar
y an
alys
is o
f direc
t an
d s
econdar
y im
pac
ts t
o
hyd
rolo
gic
ally
-connec
ted w
etla
nds,
als
o d
esig
nat
ed a
s EFH
that
could
occ
ur
as a
re
sult o
f th
e Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n,
incl
udin
g t
he
UM
AM
FG
cre
dits
that
would
be
nee
ded
fo
r m
itig
atio
n.
5
This
met
hodolo
gy
is d
eriv
ed f
rom
sec
ondar
y im
pac
ts S
ection 4
-2-7
of
2007 B
asis
of
Rev
iew
for
Envi
ronm
ent
Res
ourc
e Pe
rmit A
pplic
ations
within
the
South
Flo
rida
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t D
istr
ict,
see
Dra
ft C
once
ptu
al M
itig
atio
n P
lan,
Att
achm
ent
2.1
-1.
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
Tab
le 2
.3-1
A
ltern
ati
ve B
1c
Imp
act
s to
Wetl
an
d H
ab
itat
Desi
gn
ate
d a
s EFH
Imp
act
Acr
es
UM
AM
Fu
nct
ion
al
Gain
(FG
) C
red
its
Need
ed
Wetl
an
d
IDW
etl
an
d T
yp
e
To
tal
Acr
es
Dir
ect
Imp
act
Seco
nd
ary
Im
pact
Dir
ect
Imp
act
Seco
nd
ary
Im
pact
W-1
7c
Man
gro
ve/E
xotic
2.6
7
2.6
70.0
0
1.2
50.0
0
W-2
5a
Man
gro
ve8.9
2
0.2
00
.39
0.1
20
.23
W-2
5b
Man
gro
ve22.8
0
0.1
80
.41
0.1
30
.30
Acr
es
To
tal =
3
4.3
9
Imp
act
Acr
es
To
tal =
3
.85
UM
AM
FG
Cre
dit
s N
eed
ed
To
tal =
2.0
3
Sourc
e:
San
dra
Wal
ters
Consu
ltan
ts,
Inc.
(SW
C),
2008
2.4
CO
NC
EP
TU
AL M
ITIG
ATIO
N F
OR
PR
OP
OS
ED
AC
TIO
N I
MP
AC
TS
TO
EFH
Bro
ward
County
has
indic
ate
d t
o t
he
FAA t
hat
the
County
inte
nds
to u
se m
itig
atio
n
cred
its
esta
blis
hed
in W
est
Lake
Par
k by
USACE p
erm
it n
o.
SAJ-
2002-0
0072 a
nd
SFW
MD
per
mit n
o.
06-0
4016-P
, to
com
pen
sate
for
direc
t an
d s
econdary
wet
land
impac
ts r
esultin
g f
rom
the
Propose
d A
ctio
n.6
The
per
mits
incl
ude
a pro
ject
pla
n
and t
he
UM
AM
FG
sco
res
gen
erat
ed b
y th
e en
han
cem
ent,
cre
atio
n,
and r
esto
ration
pro
ject
s occ
urr
ing a
t th
e par
k.7
Acc
ord
ing
to
the
USACE
asse
ssm
ents
, th
ere
is
an
estim
ated
to
tal
of
20.5
7 m
angro
ve
mitig
atio
n
cred
its
availa
ble
fo
r Bro
war
d
County
base
d
on
the
crea
tion,
enhan
cem
ent,
an
d pre
serv
atio
n pro
ject
s per
mitte
d at
W
est
Lake
Par
k.
Bro
ward
County
pro
pose
s to
use
a p
ort
ion o
f th
ese
cred
its
to c
om
pen
sate
for
direc
t an
d se
condar
y w
etla
nd im
pact
s th
at w
ould
occ
ur
with th
e co
nst
ruct
ion of
the
Propose
d A
ctio
n.
No F
G c
redits
hav
e ye
t bee
n a
pplie
d t
o a
ny
Bro
ward
County
pro
ject
s; t
her
efore
, all
funct
ional gai
n c
redits
rem
ain a
vaila
ble
for
allo
cation
8.
The
conce
ptu
al m
itig
atio
n p
lan f
or
all
wet
land i
mpac
ts r
esultin
g f
rom
the
Propose
d
Act
ion is
pro
vided
as
Att
ach
men
t 2
.1-1
,Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan.
This
co
nce
ptu
al m
itig
atio
n pla
n w
as
pro
vided
to
U
SAC
E an
d SFW
MD
fo
r re
view
an
d
com
men
t an
d d
iscu
ssed
in a
tel
econfe
rence
conduct
ed o
n J
anuary
31,
2008.
6
Sourc
e: B
row
ard C
ounty
Avi
atio
n D
epar
tmen
t (B
CAD
) le
tter
to t
he
FAA d
ated
Dec
ember
4,
2007
regar
din
g t
he
use
of
wet
land m
itig
atio
n c
redits
at W
est
Lake
Par
k fo
r Air
por
t Sponso
r’s
Propose
d
Proje
ct,
2007.
7
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
Mitig
atio
n P
lan a
nd U
MAM
sco
res
wer
e pro
duce
d b
y M
iller
Leg
g a
nd A
ssoci
ates
and
incl
uded
in U
SACE a
nd S
FWM
D p
erm
its
SAJ-
2002-0
0072 a
nd 0
6-0
4016-P
, 2006
8
Sourc
e:
Januar
y 22,
2008
tele
phone
confe
rence
w
ith
Wes
t La
ke
Park
M
anag
er
Pat
Young.
In
form
atio
n p
rovi
ded
by
San
dra
Wal
ters
Consu
ltan
ts,
Inc.
2008.
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
2.5
CU
MU
LA
TIV
E E
FFEC
TS
The
Counci
l on E
nvi
ronm
enta
l Q
ual
ity’
s (C
EQ
) re
gula
tions
(40 C
FR §
1500 t
hro
ugh
1508)
imple
men
ting t
he
pro
cedura
l pro
visi
on o
f th
e N
atio
nal
Envi
ronm
enta
l Po
licy
Act
(N
EPA
), a
s am
ended
(42 U
.S.C
. § 4
321 e
t. s
eq.)
def
ine
cum
ula
tive
eff
ects
as
“the
impact
on t
he
envi
ronm
ent
whic
h r
esults
from
the
incr
emen
tal
impac
t of
the
action
when
ad
ded
to
oth
er
pas
t,
pre
sent,
an
d
reas
onably
fo
rese
eable
fu
ture
ac
tions
regar
dle
ss o
f w
hat
agen
cy (
Feder
al o
r non-F
eder
al)
or
per
son u
nder
take
s su
ch oth
er ac
tions”
(s
ee 40 C
FR 1508.7
). Cum
ula
tive
im
pact
s ca
n re
sult fr
om
in
div
idual
ly m
inor
but
colle
ctiv
ely
signific
ant
actions
taki
ng p
lace
ove
r a p
erio
d o
f tim
e.9
CEQ
guid
ance
in c
onsi
der
ing c
um
ula
tive
eff
ects
invo
lves
def
inin
g t
he
scope
of
the
oth
er a
ctio
ns
and t
hei
r in
terr
elat
ionsh
ips
with t
he
pro
pose
d p
roje
ct.
The
scope
must
consi
der
geo
gra
phic
al a
nd t
empora
l ove
rlap
am
ong t
he
pro
pose
d p
roje
ct a
nd
oth
er a
ctio
ns.
It
must
als
o e
valu
ate
the
oth
er a
ctio
ns
at t
he
tim
e of th
e ove
rlap
.
Dev
elopm
ent
pro
ject
s in
the
area
surr
oundin
g F
LL h
ave
resu
lted
in a
subst
antial
m
odific
ation t
o t
he
exis
ting l
andsc
ape.
Fo
r th
e purp
ose
s of
this
ass
essm
ent,
the
pas
t ac
tions
are
def
ined
as
those
that
wer
e co
mple
ted b
etw
een 1
999 a
nd 2
004.
Pr
esen
t ac
tions
are
def
ined
as
those
com
ple
ted f
rom
2005 t
o 2
008.
Fore
seea
ble
fu
ture
act
ions
are
def
ined
as
those
pla
nned
to o
ccur
bet
wee
n 2
009 a
nd 2
020,
whic
h
is w
ithin
the
pla
nnin
g h
orizo
n o
f th
e EIS
. T
ab
le 2
.4-1
sum
mar
izes
the
impact
an
alys
es t
o w
etla
nds
and E
FH f
rom
pro
ject
s in
the
area
aro
und F
LL.
9
CFR
Title
40:
Prote
ctio
n o
f Envi
ronm
ent.
§ 1
508.7
Cum
ula
tive
Im
pac
t.
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
Tab
le 2
.4-1
S
um
mary
An
aly
sis
of
Cu
mu
lati
ve I
mp
act
s to
Wetl
an
ds
an
d E
FH
Nam
e o
f P
roje
ct
Wetl
an
d
Imp
act
sEFH
Im
pact
s C
om
men
ts o
n
Mit
igati
on
P
ast
Pro
ject
s Fl
ori
da
Air
spac
e O
ptim
izat
ion
Proje
ct
No im
pac
ts
No im
pac
ts
N/A
Port
Eve
rgla
des
Pro
ject
s
Ter
min
al 2
5 E
xpan
sion
No im
pac
ts
No im
pac
ts
N/A
Ter
min
al 2
1 E
xpan
sion &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
No im
pac
ts
No im
pac
ts
N/A
Const
ruct
ion o
f O
per
atio
ns
Cen
ter
& H
arborm
aste
r
Tow
er
No im
pac
ts
No im
pac
ts
N/A
Ter
min
al 2
Exp
ansi
on
No im
pac
ts
No im
pac
ts
N/A
Port
Sec
urity
Enhan
cem
ents
No im
pac
ts
No im
pac
ts
N/A
Oce
an-D
redged
Mat
eria
l D
isposa
l Site
No I
mpac
ts
Som
e m
inor
dir
ect/
indir
ect
impac
ts o
n w
ater
co
lum
n a
nd b
enth
ic
envi
ronm
ent
at
off
shore
dis
posa
l si
te
Mitig
ated
thro
ugh
appro
pri
ate
test
ing o
f th
e dre
dged
mat
eria
l pri
or
to d
isposa
l as
wel
l as
ongoin
g E
PA
monitoring o
f th
e ar
eal
exte
nt
of
impac
t an
d
rate
of
reco
very
Cu
rren
t P
roje
cts
FLL
Air
port
Curr
ent
Proje
cts
No c
urr
ent
impac
ts
No c
urr
ent
impac
tsN
/A
Port
Eve
rgla
des
Har
bor
Curr
ent
Proje
cts
Pote
ntial
im
pac
ts
to juri
sdic
tion
al
wet
lands
incl
udin
g
man
gro
ves
for
the
pla
nned
dre
dgin
g
pro
ject
s ar
e bei
ng a
sses
sed
Impac
ts t
o E
FH
could
occ
ur
with t
he
pla
nned
dre
dgin
g
activi
ties
incl
udin
g
tem
pora
ry t
urb
idity
of
the
wat
er c
olu
mn
and r
emova
l of
ben
thic
spec
ies.
Ass
essm
ent
of
impac
ts a
re o
ngoin
g
Plan
ned
mitig
atio
n
opport
unitie
s at
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
are
bei
ng
consi
der
ed f
or
any
unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts
Bro
war
d I
nte
rmodal
Cen
ter
and A
uto
mat
ed P
eople
Move
r
Impac
ts t
o
juri
sdic
tional
w
etla
nds
occ
urr
ing w
ithin
th
e st
udy
area
ar
e cu
rren
tly
bei
ng a
sses
sed
Impac
ts t
o c
erta
in
estu
arin
e an
d
mar
ine
wet
lands
des
ignat
ed a
s EFH
w
ithin
the
study
area
are
curr
ently
bei
ng a
sses
sed
FDO
T w
etla
nd
mitig
atio
n s
ite
at I
-595
and U
S-1
inte
rchan
ge
is
curr
ently
bei
ng
consi
der
ed f
or
any
pote
ntial
unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts
Oce
an E
xpre
ss N
atura
l G
as
Pipel
ine
No im
pac
ts
bec
ause
usi
ng
dir
ectional
dri
lling
Impac
ts t
o 0
.44
acre
s of
atta
ched
ep
iben
thic
bio
ta w
ith
5-2
0%
cove
rage
and
0.3
8 a
cres
of
sandy
bott
om
Rem
ova
l of
37,6
42 t
ires
in
tir
e re
ef o
ff o
f Bro
war
d C
ounty
(D
EP
per
mit n
o.
06-0
193181-
006)
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
Tab
le 2
.4-1
, C
on
tin
ued
Su
mm
ary
An
aly
sis
of
Cu
mu
lati
ve I
mp
act
s to
Wetl
an
ds
an
d E
FH
Nam
e o
f P
roje
ct
Wetl
an
d
Imp
act
sEFH
Im
pact
s C
om
men
ts o
n
Mit
igati
on
Tra
cteb
el C
alyp
so N
atura
l G
as
Pipel
ine
Tota
l ex
pec
ted
wet
land im
pac
ts
incl
udes
les
s th
an 0
.1 a
cres
of
dir
ect
impac
ts
Impac
ts t
o E
FH f
or
vari
ous
nea
rshore
an
d o
ffsh
ore
spec
ies
and c
olo
niz
ed
har
dbott
om
are
ex
pec
ted w
ith
const
ruct
ion o
f pip
elin
e
Plan
ned
pat
h w
ould
m
inim
ize
impac
ts t
o
pro
tect
ed s
pec
ies
and
hab
itat
s nea
rshore
and
off
shore
. R
esto
ration o
f a
wet
land a
rea
ove
run
by
exotics
onsi
te is
curr
ently
pla
nned
to
mitig
ate
for
unav
oid
able
w
etla
nd im
pac
ts
South
Flo
rida
Eas
t Coas
t Corr
idor
Tra
nsi
t Anal
ysis
Stu
dy
No im
pac
ts y
et
iden
tified
(st
udy
is in p
lannin
g
phas
e)
No im
pac
ts y
et
iden
tified
(st
udy
is
in p
lannin
g p
has
e)
N/A
Nort
h P
erry
Air
port
Mas
ter
Pl
an U
pdat
e
No im
pac
ts y
et
iden
tified
(st
udy
is in p
lannin
g
phas
e)
No im
pac
ts y
et
iden
tified
(st
udy
is
in p
lannin
g p
has
e)
N/A
Propose
d D
ania
Bea
ch
U.S
. Bord
er P
atro
l Fa
cilit
y
Impac
ts t
o 4
.16
acre
s of
juri
sdic
tional
m
angro
vew
etla
nds
is
expec
ted
Impac
ts t
o 4
.16
acre
s of
man
gro
ve
hab
itat
des
ignat
ed
as E
FH is
expec
ted
Propose
to p
urc
has
e 2.7
1
saltw
ater
wet
land c
redits
at F
PL E
verg
lades
M
itig
atio
n B
anka
Reaso
nab
ly F
ore
seeab
le F
utu
re A
ctio
ns
Tax
iway
C E
xten
sion a
nd
Rel
oca
tion/D
ecom
mis
sionin
g
of
VO
R B
eaco
n a
t FL
L
Not
yet
det
erm
ined
Not
yet
det
erm
ined
. N
o a
dve
rse
impac
ts
to w
etla
nds
or
EFH
ar
e ex
pec
ted.
N/A
New
Bro
war
d C
ounty
AD
A
Faci
lity
Not
yet
det
erm
ined
N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
. N
/A
Reh
abili
tation
of
Runw
ays
9R/2
7L
and 1
3/3
1 a
t FL
L N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
Not
yet
det
erm
ined
.
No a
dve
rse
impac
ts
to w
etla
nds
or
EFH
ar
e ex
pec
ted.
N/A
Atlan
tic
Vill
age
Hote
l an
d
Mar
ina
Not
yet
det
erm
ined
N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
. N
/A
Port
Eve
rgla
des
Pla
nned
Ter
min
al P
roje
cts
Not
yet
det
erm
ined
N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
. N
/A
Plan
ned
Dre
dgin
g a
t Po
rt
Eve
rgla
des
N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
. N
/A
FPL
Port
Eve
rgla
des
Pow
er
Plan
t N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
N
ot
yet
det
erm
ined
. N
/A
a Sourc
e:
Bar
bar
a Chow
, Bro
war
d C
ounty
Envi
ronm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion D
epar
tmen
t, A
ugust
2007
Sourc
e of
table
: S
andra
Wal
ters
Consu
ltan
ts,
Inc.
(SW
C),
2007
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
A d
escr
iption o
f al
l of
the
above
pro
ject
s, e
xcep
t fo
r th
e D
an
ia B
each
U.S
. B
ord
er
Patr
ol
Faci
lity
, w
as p
rovi
ded
in t
he
Dra
ft E
IS i
n C
hap
ter
7 C
um
ula
tive
Im
pac
ts,
Sec
tion 7
.1.1
, Id
entifica
tion o
f Pe
rtin
ent
Past
, Pr
esen
t, a
nd R
easo
nab
ly F
ore
seea
ble
Fu
ture
Act
ions.
A des
crip
tion of
the
Dan
ia Bea
ch U
.S.
Bord
er Pat
rol
Faci
lity
is
pro
vided
bel
ow
.
Dan
ia B
each
U.S
. B
ord
er
Patr
ol
Faci
lity
: T
he
Dep
artm
ent
of
Def
ense
(D
OD
) is
pro
posi
ng t
o c
onst
ruct
a b
ord
er p
atro
l fa
cilit
y on a
n u
ndev
eloped
4.3
46-a
cre
par
cel
loca
ted in t
he
City
of
Dan
ia B
each
. T
he
DO
D s
eeks
to p
rote
ct t
he
nat
ion’s
bord
ers
by
contr
olli
ng a
cces
s an
d p
reve
nting i
llegal
and h
arm
ful
indiv
idual
s fr
om
ente
ring
the
United
Sta
tes,
incl
udin
g ille
gal
im
mig
rants
, dru
g t
raff
icke
rs,
and t
erro
rist
s.
The
pro
pose
d
faci
lity
will
hel
p
enhan
ce
bord
er
pro
tect
ion
along
the
South
Fl
orida
coas
tlin
e an
d w
ill b
e st
rate
gic
ally
pla
ced c
lose
to b
oth
FLL
and P
ort
Eve
rgla
des
.
The
pro
ject
w
ould
in
volv
e filli
ng
appro
xim
atel
y 4.1
6
acr
es
of
jurisd
ictional
m
angro
ve w
etla
nds
des
ignate
d a
s EFH
for
const
ruct
ion o
f th
e fa
cilit
y as
wel
l as
oth
er s
upport
ing s
truct
ure
s.
Propose
d m
itig
atio
n f
or
thes
e unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts t
o
man
gro
ves
and E
FH c
onsi
sts
of
the
purc
has
e of
2.7
1 s
altw
ater
wet
land c
redits
at
Florida
Pow
er &
Lig
ht
(FPL
) Eve
rgla
des
Mitig
atio
n B
ank.
3.0
CO
NC
LU
SIO
N
The
Propose
d Act
ion co
uld
pote
ntial
ly im
pac
t 3.8
5 ac
res
of
man
gro
ve w
etla
nds
des
ignat
ed a
s EFH
due
to d
irec
t an
d p
oss
ible
sec
ondar
y im
pact
s fr
om
const
ruct
ion
of
the
appro
ach l
ight
syst
em a
nd a
ssoci
ate
d a
cces
s ro
ads
to t
he
east
of
Runw
ay
9R/2
7L.
Im
pac
ts t
o t
hes
e m
angro
ve a
reas
would
res
ult i
n 2
.03 U
MAM
FG
cre
dits
nee
ded
for
mitig
atio
n.
A t
ota
l of
at
leas
t 20.5
7 m
angro
ve F
G c
redits
are
ava
ilable
fr
om
Bro
war
d C
ounty
’s a
lrea
dy-
per
mitte
d W
est
Lake
Par
k m
itig
atio
n p
roje
ct.
No
cred
it h
as b
een a
lloca
ted s
o f
ar
to a
ny
oth
er p
roje
ct;
ther
efore
, al
l cr
edits
rem
ain
avai
lable
fo
r al
loca
tion.
The
County
pla
ns
to use
a
port
ion of
thes
e cr
edits
to
mitig
ate
for
unav
oid
able
im
pact
s fr
om
the
pro
pose
d r
unw
ay e
xten
sion p
roje
ct a
t FL
L.
Oth
er p
roje
cts
in t
he
area
have
had
or
are
antici
pat
ed t
o h
ave
wet
land a
nd E
FH
impac
ts.
How
ever
, th
ese
impac
ts h
ave
either
alrea
dy
bee
n m
itig
ate
d,
or,
thro
ugh
the
envi
ronm
enta
l re
sourc
e per
mitting p
roce
ss a
re s
till
bei
ng a
sses
sed a
nd w
ill b
e re
quired
to b
e m
itig
ated
.
With t
he
mitig
ation p
ropose
d f
or
the
Propose
d A
ctio
n a
nd t
he
required
mitig
ation
for
oth
er pro
ject
s in
th
e su
rroundin
g ar
ea,
no si
gnific
ant
direc
t, se
condary
, or
cum
ula
tive
ef
fect
s to
EFH
, w
ildlif
e,
or
pro
tect
ed
spec
ies—
when
co
nsi
der
ed
in
additio
n t
o o
ther
are
a dev
elopm
ents
—ar
e an
tici
pat
ed w
ith i
mple
men
tation o
f th
e Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n.
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
4.0
SU
MM
AR
Y
AN
D
RE
SP
ON
SE
S
TO
N
MFS
C
OM
ME
NTS
A
ND
EFH
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
N R
EC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
NS
NM
FS r
evie
wed
the
Dra
ft E
IS a
nd p
rovi
ded
com
men
ts a
nd/o
r re
ques
ts f
or
additio
nal
in
form
atio
n r
egar
din
g p
ote
ntial
eff
ects
to E
FH b
y th
e Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n in a
let
ter
to
the
FAA dat
ed M
ay 17,
2007.
The
follo
win
g is
a
sum
mar
y of
the
com
men
ts
pro
vided
by
NM
FS a
s w
ell
as t
he
asso
ciat
ed r
esponse
s base
d o
n t
he
info
rmation
pre
sente
d in t
his
rep
ort
:
�P
rovid
e a
fu
ll a
ssess
men
t o
f cu
mu
lati
ve e
ffect
s: T
he
full
asse
ssm
ent
of
cum
ula
tive
eff
ects
on w
etla
nds
and E
FH i
n t
he
surr
oundin
g a
rea
is p
rovi
ded
in
Tab
le 2
.4-1
Sum
mar
y Analy
sis
of
Cum
ula
tive
Im
pac
ts t
o W
etla
nds
and E
FH,
and i
ncl
udes
pote
ntial
im
pac
ts a
s w
ell
as
pro
pose
d m
itig
ation.
Des
crip
tion a
nd
anal
ysis
of
the
pro
pose
d U
S B
ord
er P
atro
l Fa
cilit
y in
Dan
ia B
each
, w
hic
h h
ad n
ot
bee
n d
iscu
ssed
in t
he
Dra
ft E
IS,
is a
lso p
rovi
ded
in S
ection 2
.4 o
f th
is r
eport
.
Exi
stin
g
dev
elopm
ent
in
south
east
Bro
war
d
County
has
al
read
y ca
use
d
subst
antial
modific
atio
n
to
the
surr
oundin
g
nat
ura
l en
viro
nm
ent.
With
the
pro
pose
d m
itig
ation,
the
limited
im
pac
ts t
o E
FH r
esultin
g f
rom
the
Pro
pose
d
Act
ion,
when
co
nsi
der
ed
in
additio
n
to
oth
er
area
dev
elopm
ents
, ar
e not
expec
ted t
o lea
d t
o s
ubst
antial
cum
ula
tive
im
pac
ts t
o E
FH,
wild
life,
or
pro
tect
ed
spec
ies.
�P
rovid
e a
co
mp
en
sato
ry m
itig
ati
on
pla
n:
The
conce
ptu
al
wet
land
mitig
ation p
lan t
o c
om
pen
sate
for
unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts t
o w
etla
nds,
incl
udin
g
wet
lands
des
ignat
ed as
EFH
, fr
om
th
e Pr
opose
d Act
ion is
en
close
d w
ith th
is
report
as
Att
ach
men
t 2
.1-1
,Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
ation P
lan.
�P
rovid
e U
nif
orm
Mit
igati
on
Ass
ess
men
t M
eth
od
(U
MA
M)
sco
res
for
the
mit
igati
on
sit
e:
The
UM
AM
fu
nct
ional
gai
n
score
s fo
r en
han
cem
ent,
cr
eation,
and p
rese
rvat
ion p
roje
cts
occ
urr
ing a
t W
est
Lake
Par
k ar
e pro
vided
in
the
USAC
E p
erm
it n
o.
SAJ-
2002-0
0072 a
nd S
FWM
D p
erm
it n
o.
06-0
4016-P
.
Thes
e sc
ore
s re
pre
sent
the
FG m
itig
ation c
redit a
vaila
ble
to t
he
County
to o
ffse
t im
pac
ts r
esultin
g f
rom
County
pro
ject
s.
�P
rovid
e t
he F
AA
’s v
iew
s re
gard
ing
th
e e
ffect
s o
f th
e P
rop
ose
d A
ctio
n o
n
EFH
:The
Propose
d Act
ion w
ould
re
sult in
a
tota
l im
pac
t of
3.8
3 ac
res
to
man
gro
ve w
etla
nds
des
ignat
ed a
s EFH
, in
cludin
g 3
.05 a
cres
of
direc
t im
pac
ts
and
0.8
0
acre
s of
poss
ible
se
condary
im
pact
s due
to
const
ruct
ion
of
the
appro
ach
lig
ht
syst
em an
d ass
oci
ated
acc
ess
roads
to th
e ea
st of
Runw
ay
9R/2
7L.
It
is
an
tici
pat
ed th
at
2.0
3 U
MAM
FG
cr
edits
would
be
nee
ded
to
co
mpen
sate
for
thes
e unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts.
Acc
ord
ing t
o t
he
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd
Mitig
ation P
lan p
rovi
ded
as
Att
ach
men
t 2
.1-1
to t
his
rep
ort
, ad
equat
e cr
edit is
avai
lable
at
W
est
Lake
Pa
rk
(at
leas
t 20.5
7
man
gro
ve
mitig
ation
cred
its
avai
lable
fro
m p
erm
itte
d p
roje
cts)
to c
om
pen
sate
for
unavo
idab
le i
mpac
ts t
o
wet
land
impac
ts
resu
ltin
g
from
th
e Pr
opose
d
Act
ion,
incl
udin
g
impac
ts
to
wet
lands
des
ignate
d a
s EFH
. A
n a
nal
ysis
of
cum
ula
tive
eff
ects
on w
etla
nds
and
EFH
is
pro
vided
in S
ection 2
.4 o
f th
is r
eport
. T
he
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n w
ould
not
resu
lt in
si
gnific
ant
cum
ula
tive
im
pact
s to
w
etla
nds
and EFH
bas
ed on th
e pro
pose
d m
itig
ation a
s w
ell as
the
mitig
atio
n t
hat
is
alre
ady
pro
pose
d o
r w
ill b
e
Dir
ect
, S
eco
nd
ary
, an
d C
um
ula
tive E
ffect
s o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
ab
itat
Fo
rt L
au
derd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
required
by
pro
ject
s in
th
e ar
ea su
rroundin
g FL
L. Ther
efore
, th
e FA
A has
det
erm
ined
that
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n w
ill n
ot
hav
e si
gnific
ant
adve
rse
impac
ts t
o
EFH
.
In a
dditio
n t
o t
he
afo
rem
entioned
com
men
ts,
NM
FS a
lso p
rovi
ded
EFH
conse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
endat
ions
bas
ed
on
the
requirem
ents
of
Sec
tion
305(b
)(4)(
A)
of
the
Mag
nuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
.
Bel
ow
ar
e th
e EFH
co
nse
rvat
ion
reco
mm
endat
ions
pro
vided
by
NM
FS a
nd F
AA’s
res
ponse
s.
�A
pla
n s
hall
be d
evelo
ped
fo
r p
rovid
ing
fu
ll,
in-k
ind
co
mp
en
sati
on
fo
r u
navo
idab
le
ad
vers
e
imp
act
s to
w
etl
an
ds.
Th
e
pla
n
shall
ad
dre
ss
com
pen
sati
on
fo
r lo
ss o
f p
rod
uct
ivit
y a
nd
hab
itat
fun
ctio
ns
that
occ
ur
du
rin
g t
he p
eri
od
betw
een
eli
min
ati
on
/d
eg
rad
ati
on
of
exis
tin
g w
etl
an
ds
an
d
est
ab
lish
men
t o
f fu
nct
ion
all
y
com
pati
ble
m
an
gro
ve
hab
itat
that
wo
uld
be p
rote
cted
in
perp
etu
ity.
Execu
tio
n o
f th
e a
pp
roved
mit
igati
on
p
lan
sh
all
be a
req
uir
ed
co
mp
on
en
t o
f th
e p
roje
ct:
A c
once
ptu
al m
itig
ation
pla
n t
o c
om
pen
sate
for
unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts t
o w
etla
nds
and E
FH is
pro
vided
in
this
rep
ort
as
Att
ach
men
t 2
.1-1
,Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan.
�A
mo
nit
ori
ng
pla
n s
hall
be d
evelo
ped
to
ass
ess
th
e e
colo
gic
al
succ
ess
of
the
off
site
, co
mp
en
sato
ry
mit
igati
on
.
An
nu
al
mo
nit
ori
ng
o
f th
e
mit
igati
on
sit
e s
hall
take p
lace
fo
r fi
ve y
ears
fo
llo
win
g c
om
ple
tio
n o
f th
e
mit
igati
on
pro
ject
. I
n t
he e
ven
t it
is
dete
rmin
ed
th
at
the i
mp
lem
en
ted
m
itig
ati
on
m
easu
res
do
n
ot
com
ple
tely
o
ffse
t th
e
dest
ruct
ion
o
f m
an
gro
ve w
etl
an
ds,
th
e p
lan
sh
all
in
clu
de c
on
tin
gen
cy m
easu
res,
su
ch
as
ad
dit
ion
al
pla
nti
ng
or
exo
tic
veg
eta
tio
n r
em
oval,
in
ord
er
to p
rovid
e
fun
ctio
nall
y su
itab
le re
pla
cem
en
t h
ab
itat.
Th
e m
itig
ati
on
/m
on
ito
rin
gp
lan
sh
all
be f
orw
ard
ed
to
th
e N
MFS
fo
r re
vie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
pri
or
to
init
iati
on
of
con
stru
ctio
n:
The
monitoring p
lan f
or
ecolo
gic
al s
ucc
ess
of
the
offsi
te,
com
pen
sato
ry m
itig
ation is
des
crib
ed in
se
ctio
n 5.0
of
the
atta
ched
co
nce
ptu
al
wet
land
mitig
atio
n
pla
n
(see
A
ttach
men
t 2
.1-1
,C
once
ptu
al
Wet
land M
itig
atio
n P
lan).
U.S
. Dep
artm
ent
of T
rans
porta
tion
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
trat
ion
OR
LA
ND
O A
IRPO
RT
S D
IST
RIC
T O
FFIC
E59
50 H
azel
tine
Nat
iona
l Dr.,
Sui
te 4
00
Orla
ndo,
Flo
rida
3282
2-50
24
Phon
e: (4
07) 8
12-6
331
Fax
: (40
7) 8
12-6
978
Janu
ary
24, 2
008
Ms.
Lea
h O
berli
n U
.S. A
rmy
Cor
ps o
f Eng
inee
rs
Pal
m B
each
Gar
dens
Reg
ulat
ory
Offi
ce
4400
PG
A B
lvd.
– S
uite
500
P
alm
Bea
ch G
arde
ns, F
lorid
a 33
410
Re:
D
raft
Con
cept
ual
Wet
land
Miti
gatio
n Pl
an f
or t
he A
irpor
t Sp
onso
r’s P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
(Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
) fo
r th
e Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal
Airp
ort
(FLL
) Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Sta
tem
ent (
EIS)
Dea
r Ms.
Obe
rlin:
The
Fede
ral A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
tratio
n (F
AA
) has
pre
pare
d a
‘Dra
ft’ C
once
ptua
l Wet
land
Miti
gatio
n P
lan
(enc
lose
d, ‘D
raft’
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Pla
n) fo
r una
void
able
impa
cts
to w
etla
nds
that
cou
ld r
esul
t fro
m i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n (A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c,
the
Airp
ort
Spo
nsor
’s P
ropo
sed
Pro
ject
) fo
r th
e FL
L R
unw
ay E
xpan
sion
EIS
. Th
e FA
A r
eque
sts
that
the
U.S
. A
rmy
Cor
ps o
f E
ngin
eers
(U
SA
CE
) re
view
thi
s ‘D
raft’
Con
cept
ual
Pla
n an
d pr
ovid
e co
mm
ents
on
the
anal
ysis
and
app
roac
h.
Wet
land
Impa
cts
and
Con
cept
ual M
itiga
tion
Bel
ow is
Tab
le 3
.3-1
from
Sec
tion
3.3
of th
e C
once
ptua
l Pla
n de
pict
ing
the
pote
ntia
l dire
ct a
nd
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s to
wet
land
s fo
r A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c,
and
the
Uni
form
Miti
gatio
n A
sses
smen
t M
etho
d (U
MA
M) f
unct
iona
l gai
n (F
G) c
redi
ts th
at a
re n
eede
d fo
r miti
gatio
n.
Tabl
e 3.
3-1
Pot
entia
l Wet
land
Impa
cts
for t
he P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
(Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
)
Impa
ct A
cres
U
MA
M F
unct
iona
l Gai
n (F
G) C
redi
ts N
eede
d W
etla
nd
IDW
etla
nd T
ype
Tota
lA
cres
D
irect
Im
pact
Seco
ndar
y Im
pact
Dire
ct
Impa
ctSe
cond
ary
Impa
ctW
-8
Man
grov
e 2.
670.
000.
070.
000.
04W
-17a
Exo
tic0.
610.
610.
000.
160.
00W
-17b
Exo
tic2.
812.
810.
001.
030.
00W
-17c
Man
grov
e/E
xotic
2.
672.
670.
001.
250.
00W
-25a
Man
grov
e 8.
920.
200.
390.
120.
23W
-25b
Man
grov
e 22
.80
0.18
0.41
0.13
0.30
W-3
3E
xotic
8.59
5.37
0.22
1.79
0.07
W-N
3aE
xotic
2.95
2.83
0.09
0.85
0.03
W-N
3b
Tree
Far
m/P
rairi
e 5.
650.
740.
240.
300.
10A
cres
To
tal =
57
.67
Impa
ct A
cres
To
tal =
16.
83
UM
AM
FG
Cre
dits
Nee
ded
Tota
l = 6
.40
Sou
rce:
San
dra
Wal
ters
Con
sulta
nts,
Inc.
, 200
8.
As
stat
ed in
the
Con
cept
ual P
lan,
Bro
war
d C
ount
y ha
s in
dica
ted
to t
he F
AA
tha
t th
e C
ount
y in
tend
s to
use
miti
gatio
n cr
edits
est
ablis
hed
at W
est
Lake
Par
k, i
n U
.S.
Arm
y C
orps
of
Eng
inee
rs (
US
AC
E)
perm
it no
. SA
J-20
02-0
0072
and
Sou
th F
lorid
a W
ater
Man
agem
ent D
istri
ct
(SFW
MD
) pe
rmit
no.
06-0
4016
-P,
to c
ompe
nsat
e fo
r po
tent
ial
dire
ct a
nd s
econ
dary
wet
land
im
pact
s re
sulti
ng f
rom
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n.
Bel
ow i
s Ta
ble
4-1
from
Sec
tion
4.0
of t
he
Con
cept
ual
Pla
n sh
owin
g th
e am
ount
of
avai
labl
e m
angr
ove
miti
gatio
n cr
edits
fro
m p
roje
cts
perm
itted
at W
est L
ake
Par
k. T
he F
G c
redi
t sco
res
wer
e ta
ken
from
the
US
AC
E p
erm
it.
Tabl
e 4-
1 Es
timat
ed M
angr
ove
Miti
gatio
n C
redi
ts A
vaila
ble
at W
est L
ake
Park
Act
ivity
Pr
ojec
t Typ
e Si
ze (a
cres
)M
itiga
tion
Cre
dit
(Fun
ctio
nal G
ain
(FG
) C
redi
t)
Man
grov
e pr
otec
tion
and
enha
ncem
ent
by ri
prap
pla
cem
ent
Enh
ance
men
t 24
.06.
24
Man
grov
e pr
otec
tion
by ri
prap
su
pple
men
t E
nhan
cem
ent
8.0
2.08
Con
vers
ion
of s
poil
isla
nd/e
xotic
do
min
ated
upl
and
area
C
reat
ion
22.2
10.4
3
Man
grov
e cr
eatio
n fro
m D
ania
Cut
off
Can
al (o
pen
wat
er)
Cre
atio
n 2.
00.
42
Man
grov
e ou
tpar
cel a
cqui
sitio
n (o
utsi
de
of im
prov
emen
t are
as)
Pre
serv
atio
n 23
.31.
4
Acr
es T
otal
=
79.5
M
angr
ove
FG C
redi
t To
tal =
20.
57
Sou
rce:
U.S
. Arm
y C
orps
of E
ngin
eers
, Per
mit
SA
J-20
02-0
0072
, 200
6
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
US
AC
E p
erm
it, a
n es
timat
ed 2
0.57
man
grov
e m
itiga
tion
cred
its a
re a
vaila
ble
to B
row
ard
Cou
nty
base
d on
the
crea
tion,
enh
ance
men
t, an
d pr
eser
vatio
n pr
ojec
ts p
erm
itted
at
Wes
t Lak
e P
ark.
Wes
t Lak
e P
ark
Man
ager
Ms.
Pat
ricia
You
ng in
form
ed th
e E
IS P
roje
ct T
eam
th
at n
o FG
cre
dits
hav
e ye
t be
en a
pplie
d to
any
Bro
war
d C
ount
y pr
ojec
ts;
ther
efor
e, a
ll fu
nctio
nal
gain
cre
dits
inc
lude
d in
thi
s ta
ble
rem
ain
avai
labl
e fo
r al
loca
tion
for
this
pro
pose
d B
row
ard
Cou
nty
airp
ort p
roje
ct.
The
perm
its fo
r the
Wes
t Lak
e P
ark
miti
gatio
n pr
ojec
t req
uire
an
indi
vidu
al a
sses
smen
t of e
ach
Cou
nty
proj
ect
invo
lvin
g im
pact
s an
d a
perm
it m
odifi
catio
n to
the
Wes
t La
ke p
erm
its b
e ac
quire
d to
app
ly F
G c
redi
ts t
o th
e sp
ecifi
c U
MA
M f
unct
iona
l los
s sc
ores
. T
here
fore
, in
the
ca
se o
f w
etla
nd i
mpa
cts
resu
lting
fro
m t
his
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n, e
nviro
nmen
tal
reso
urce
per
mit
(ER
P) a
pplic
atio
ns w
ould
be
subm
itted
to th
e S
FWM
D a
nd U
SA
CE
alo
ng w
ith a
n ap
plic
atio
n fo
r a
Wes
t Lak
e P
ark
perm
it m
odifi
catio
n to
allo
cate
6.4
0 FG
cre
dits
to c
ompe
nsat
e fo
r th
e 16
.83
acre
s of
una
void
able
dire
ct a
nd s
econ
dary
impa
cts
to w
etla
nds
from
con
stru
ctio
n of
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
. M
itiga
tion
cred
its w
ould
be
assi
gned
to th
e pr
ojec
t upo
n ap
prov
al o
f the
se a
pplic
atio
ns b
y th
e re
gula
tory
age
ncie
s.
Miti
gatio
n fo
r Im
pact
s to
Wet
land
33
(W-3
3)
As
disc
lose
d in
the
FAA
Dra
ft E
IS,1 W
etla
nd 3
3 (W
-33)
is a
fres
hwat
er w
etla
nd d
omin
ated
by
Bra
zilia
n P
eppe
r.
W-3
3 is
th
e on
ly
wet
land
af
fect
ed
by
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
th
at
exhi
bits
ch
arac
teris
tics
of a
fres
hwat
er w
etla
nd.
US
AC
E a
nd S
FWM
D s
taff
agre
ed c
once
ptua
lly to
the
1Fo
rt La
uder
dale
Hol
lyw
ood
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
irpor
t D
raft
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Sta
tem
ent.
U.S
. D
epar
tmen
t of
Tr
ansp
orta
tion,
Fed
eral
Avi
atio
n A
dmin
istra
tion,
Mar
ch 2
007.
use
of o
ut-o
f-kin
d m
itiga
tion
cred
it at
Wes
t Lak
e P
ark
to c
ompe
nsat
e fo
r im
pact
s to
W-3
3 du
ring
a S
epte
mbe
r 13,
200
6 te
leph
one
conf
eren
ce w
ith re
gula
tory
age
ncy
repr
esen
tativ
es.
Con
clus
ion
The
FAA
is
requ
estin
g th
at t
he U
SA
CE
rev
iew
the
enc
lose
d ‘D
raft’
Con
cept
ual
Wet
land
M
itiga
tion
Pla
n an
d pr
ovid
e co
mm
ents
reg
ardi
ng t
he a
naly
sis
and
appr
oach
. I
f yo
u ha
ve a
ny
ques
tions
reg
ardi
ng t
his
info
rmat
ion
or r
equi
re a
dditi
onal
info
rmat
ion,
ple
ase
call
me
at (
407)
81
2-63
31 e
xten
sion
#12
9.
We
will
als
o di
scus
s th
is i
nfor
mat
ion
with
you
at
our
sche
dule
d te
leco
nfer
ence
on
Janu
ary
31th a
t 1:0
0 p.
m.
(The
tele
conf
eren
ce n
umbe
r and
acc
ess
code
will
be
sen
t to
you
via
emai
l.)
* *
* *
*
Visi
on 1
00 A
ct:
Inte
rage
ncy
Stre
amlin
ing
In a
ccor
danc
e w
ith t
he M
emor
andu
m o
f U
nder
stan
ding
for
Inte
rage
ncy
Ste
war
dshi
p an
d S
tream
linin
g Fo
rt La
uder
dale
-Hol
lyw
ood
Inte
rnat
iona
l Airp
ort
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Sta
tem
ent
and
Per
mitt
ing
betw
een
the
FAA
and
the
US
AC
E,
plea
se
sign
an
d re
turn
th
e A
genc
y C
onse
nsus
For
m e
nclo
sed
as A
ttach
men
t A.
Sin
cere
ly,
Virg
inia
Lan
e, A
.I.C
.P.
Env
ironm
enta
l Spe
cial
ist
Atta
chm
ent A
A
genc
y C
onse
nsus
For
m
cc: A
nita
Bai
n, S
outh
Flo
rida
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t Dis
trict
Mar
c G
ambr
ill, B
row
ard
Cou
nty
Avi
atio
n D
epar
tmen
t
S
uzie
Kle
ymey
er, A
.I.C
.P.,
Land
rum
& B
row
n
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
Co
nc
ep
tua
l We
tla
nd
Mit
iga
tio
n P
lan
U.S
. De
pa
rtm
en
t o
f T
ran
spo
rta
tio
n
Fe
de
ral A
via
tio
n A
dm
inis
tra
tio
n
F
ort
La
ud
erd
ale
-Ho
llyw
oo
d In
tern
ati
on
al A
irp
ort
P
rop
ose
d D
eve
lop
me
nt
an
d E
xpa
nsi
on
of
Ru
nw
ay
9R
/27
L a
nd
Oth
er
Ass
oc
iate
d A
irp
ort
Pro
jec
ts
Pre
pa
red
fo
r th
e F
AA
by:
S
WC
(S
an
dra
Wa
lte
rs C
on
sult
an
ts, I
nc
.)
64
10
Fif
th S
tre
et,
Su
ite
3
Ke
y W
est
, FL
33
04
0
Jan
ua
ry 2
4, 2
00
8
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
TAB
LE O
F C
ON
TEN
TS
Sect
ion
Des
crip
tion
Page
1.0
Intro
duct
ion.
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
1
2.0
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..
1 3.
0 P
oten
tial W
etla
nd Im
pact
s fro
m th
e P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
......
......
..
3
3.1
Dire
ct Im
pact
s....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
3
3.
2 S
econ
dary
Impa
cts
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..
4
3.3
Tota
l Wet
land
Impa
cts
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...
5 4.
0 C
once
ptua
l Miti
gatio
n...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
6
5.0
Miti
gatio
n M
onito
ring
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
7 6.
0 M
itiga
tion
Com
plia
nce
Sch
edul
e...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
. 7
7.0
Com
plet
ion
of th
e FA
A E
IS P
roce
ss
and
Pro
pose
d C
onst
ruct
ion
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....
8
App
endi
x A
D
escr
iptio
n of
the
Inst
alla
tion
of th
e A
ppro
ach
Ligh
t S
yste
m fo
r the
B1c
Alte
rnat
ive
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.1 p
age
App
endi
x B
D
escr
iptio
ns o
f Affe
cted
Wet
land
s in
the
Det
aile
dS
tudy
Are
a fo
r the
B1c
Alte
rnat
ive
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.2 p
ages
LIST
OF
TAB
LES
No.
* D
escr
iptio
n Pa
ge
3.3-
1 P
oten
tial W
etla
nd Im
pact
s fo
r the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n
(Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
)....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
. 5
4-
1 E
stim
ated
Man
grov
e M
itiga
tion
Cre
dits
Ava
ilabl
e at
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...
6
6-1
Pro
pose
d P
erm
it C
ompl
ianc
e S
ched
ule
......
......
......
......
......
.....
8
LIST
OF
ATT
AC
HM
ENTS
N
o.*
Des
crip
tion
# of
Pag
es
3-1
Sum
mar
y of
Sep
tem
ber 1
3, 2
006
Tele
conf
eren
ce w
ith
Reg
ulat
ory
Age
ncie
s to
Dev
elop
Con
curr
ence
on
UM
AM
Sco
res
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
. 2
3.
1-1
Impa
cts
to W
etla
nds
from
B1b
/c A
ltern
ativ
e ...
......
......
......
......
.
1 3.
2-1
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
s S
ectio
n 4-
2-7
from
200
7 S
FWM
D B
asis
of R
evie
w fo
r Env
ironm
ent R
esou
rce
Per
mit
App
licat
ions
With
in th
e S
outh
Flo
rida
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t Dis
trict
......
......
...
4 3.
2-2
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
s to
Wet
land
s S
outh
of
the
Airf
ield
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..
1
i
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
LIST
OF
ATT
AC
HM
ENTS
, Con
tinue
d N
o.*
Des
crip
tion
# of
Pag
es
3.2-
3 A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c S
econ
dary
Impa
cts
to W
etla
nds
Eas
t of
the
Airf
ield
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
1 3.
2-4
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
s to
Wet
land
s W
est
of th
e A
irfie
ld...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
. 1
3.3-
1 D
irect
Impa
ct U
MA
M W
etla
nd S
core
She
ets
for A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....
16
3.
3-2
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
UM
AM
Wet
land
Sco
re S
heet
s fo
r Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..
12
* N
ote:
Ta
bles
and
atta
chm
ents
are
num
bere
d co
rresp
ondi
ng w
ith t
he C
once
ptua
l M
itiga
tion
Pla
n se
ctio
n in
whi
ch th
ey a
re lo
cate
d.
ii
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
1
1.0
INTR
OD
UC
TIO
N
The
purp
ose
of t
his
repo
rt is
to
prov
ide
a co
ncep
tual
miti
gatio
n pl
an f
or p
oten
tially
un
avoi
dabl
e im
pact
s to
juris
dict
iona
l wet
land
s du
e to
the
cons
truct
ion
of th
e P
ropo
sed
Act
ion,
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
.1 The
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n w
as d
escr
ibed
in t
he F
ort
Laud
erda
le-
Hol
lyw
ood
Inte
rnat
iona
l Airp
ort (
FLL)
Dra
ft E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct S
tate
men
t (E
IS)
and
incl
udes
the
dev
elop
men
t an
d ex
pans
ion
of R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L a
nd o
ther
ass
ocia
ted
airp
ort p
roje
cts.
The
Nat
iona
l Env
ironm
enta
l Pol
icy
Act
(NE
PA
) of 1
969
requ
ires
that
an
EIS
dis
cuss
the
“mea
ns
to
miti
gate
ad
vers
e en
viro
nmen
tal
impa
cts.
”2 Th
e Fe
dera
l A
viat
ion
Adm
inis
tratio
n (F
AA
)ha
s in
corp
orat
ed
the
requ
irem
ent
to
incl
ude
disc
ussi
on
of
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
as a
par
t of t
he E
IS p
roce
ss in
FA
A O
rder
105
0.1E
, Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
s: P
olic
ies
and
Pro
cedu
res,
Cha
pter
Fiv
e, P
arag
raph
506
h, M
itiga
tion,
whi
ch
stat
es t
hat
the
EIS
des
crib
e m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s co
nsid
ered
or
plan
ned
to m
inim
ize
harm
fro
m t
he p
ropo
sed
actio
n.
Furth
er,
FAA
Ord
er 1
050.
1E,
App
endi
x A
, S
ectio
n 18
.2e,
req
uire
s th
at i
f th
e ac
tion
wou
ld a
ffect
wet
land
s an
d th
ere
is n
o pr
actic
able
al
tern
ativ
e, a
ll pr
actic
al m
eans
sho
uld
be e
mpl
oyed
to
min
imiz
e th
e w
etla
nd i
mpa
cts
due
to r
unof
f, co
nstru
ctio
n, s
edim
enta
tion,
land
use
, or
oth
er r
easo
n.
The
EIS
mus
t co
ntai
n a
desc
riptio
n of
pro
pose
d m
itiga
tions
, w
ith t
he u
nder
stan
ding
tha
t a
deta
iled
miti
gatio
n pl
an m
ust
be d
evel
oped
to
the
satis
fact
ion
of t
he 4
04 p
erm
ittin
g ag
ency
in
cons
ulta
tion
with
thos
e ag
enci
es h
avin
g an
inte
rest
in th
e af
fect
ed w
etla
nd.
2.0
PRO
POSE
D A
CTI
ON
Th
e P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
wou
ld r
edev
elop
Run
way
9R
/27L
to a
leng
th o
f 8,0
00 fe
et a
nd a
w
idth
of 1
50 fe
et.
An
Eng
inee
red
Mat
eria
l Arr
estin
g S
yste
m (
EM
AS)
wou
ld b
e us
ed a
t ea
ch r
unw
ay e
nd in
pla
ce o
f a s
tand
ard
Run
way
Saf
ety
Are
a (R
SA
). T
he e
ast e
nd o
f R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L w
ould
be
elev
ated
ove
r th
e Fl
orid
a E
ast C
oast
(FE
C)
Rai
lway
and
US
H
ighw
ay 1
. Th
e w
este
rn e
xten
t of
the
run
way
wou
ld b
e th
e D
ania
Cut
-Off
Can
al.
Run
way
13/
31 w
ould
be
perm
anen
tly c
lose
d to
acc
omm
odat
e el
evat
ion
of R
unw
ay
9R/2
7L.
As
disc
usse
d in
the
Dra
ft E
IS, t
he P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
and
alte
rnat
ives
wer
e de
velo
ped
to
avoi
d an
d m
inim
ize
dire
ct im
pact
s to
wet
land
s to
the
exte
nt p
ract
icab
le.
In D
ecem
ber
2003
, th
e B
row
ard
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
app
rove
d a
mod
ified
sou
th r
unw
ay e
xpan
sion
w
hich
was
to s
tay
with
in th
e co
nfin
es o
f 7th A
venu
e on
the
east
sid
e of
the
Airp
ort.
The
in
tent
of t
his
Com
mis
sion
act
ion
was
to li
mit
impa
cts
to w
etla
nds
loca
ted
to th
e ea
st o
f 7th
Ave
nue
on th
e ea
st s
ide
of th
e A
irpor
t.3 In
addi
tion,
Bro
war
d C
ount
y ha
s co
mm
itted
to
the
use
of
a m
odifi
ed r
unw
ay a
ppro
ach
light
sys
tem
for
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n.
This
m
odifi
ed r
unw
ay a
ppro
ach
light
sys
tem
avo
ids
encr
oach
men
t of
the
Dan
ia C
ut-O
ff
1Th
e ai
rfiel
d ge
omet
ry, N
AV
AID
s, a
nd p
oten
tial f
acilit
y im
pact
s fo
r Alte
rnat
ive
B1b
and
B1c
are
iden
tical
. A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c in
clud
es o
pera
tiona
l res
trict
ions
spe
cifie
d in
the
Inte
rloca
l agr
eem
ents
. B
row
ard
Cou
nty’
s P
refe
rred
Alte
rnat
ive
is A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c a
nd th
e P
ropo
sed
Act
ion.
2N
atio
nal E
nviro
nmen
tal P
olic
y A
ct (N
EP
A) o
f 196
9 (P
.L. 9
1-19
0) §
1502
.16(
h).
3 B
row
ard
Cou
nty
Avi
atio
n D
epar
tmen
t Dec
embe
r 12,
200
3 Le
tter f
rom
Tom
Jar
giel
lo, A
ctin
g D
irect
or o
f Avi
atio
n,
to D
ean
Stri
nger
, Man
ager
FA
A O
rland
o A
irpor
ts D
istri
ct O
ffice
.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
2
Can
al a
nd th
e ad
jace
nt tr
iang
ular
mar
ine
wat
erbo
dy o
n th
e w
est e
nd o
f the
runw
ay. T
he
mod
ified
run
way
app
roac
h lig
ht s
yste
m w
ould
als
o pr
even
t the
enc
roac
hmen
t of W
est
Lake
Par
k an
d re
duce
s im
pact
s to
wet
land
s on
the
eas
t en
d of
the
run
way
(se
e A
ppen
dix
A o
f thi
s re
port,
Des
crip
tion
of th
e In
stal
latio
n of
the
Run
way
App
roac
h Li
ght
Sys
tem
for A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c).
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
incl
udes
the
follo
win
g el
emen
ts:
� E
xpan
d an
d el
evat
e R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L to
an
over
all l
engt
h of
8,0
00 fe
et a
nd w
idth
of
150
feet
� C
onst
ruct
a n
ew fu
ll-le
ngth
par
alle
l tax
iway
75
feet
wid
e on
the
north
sid
e of
Run
way
9R
/27L
with
sep
arat
ion
of 4
00 fe
et fr
om 9
R/2
7L
� C
onst
ruct
an
oute
r dua
l par
alle
l tax
iway
that
wou
ld b
e se
para
ted
from
the
prop
osed
no
rth s
ide
para
llel t
axiw
ay b
y 27
6 fe
et
� C
onst
ruct
con
nect
ing
taxi
way
s fro
m t
he p
ropo
sed
full-
leng
th p
aral
lel
taxi
way
to
exis
ting
taxi
way
s
� C
onst
ruct
an
Inst
rum
ent L
andi
ng S
yste
m (I
LS) f
or la
ndin
gs o
n ru
nway
s 9R
and
27L
. R
unw
ay e
nds
9R a
nd 2
7L w
ould
hav
e a
Cat
egor
y I I
LS, w
hich
incl
udes
a M
ediu
m
Inte
nsity
App
roac
h Li
ght
Sys
tem
with
run
way
alig
nmen
t in
dica
tor
light
s (M
ALS
R),
loca
lizer
, and
glid
eslo
pe a
nten
nae
(see
App
endi
x A
of t
his
repo
rt, D
escr
iptio
n of
the
Inst
alla
tion
of th
e R
unw
ay A
ppro
ach
Ligh
t Sys
tem
for A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c).
� D
ecom
mis
sion
Run
way
13/
31
� R
edev
elop
term
inal
gat
es
The
follo
win
g co
nnec
ted
actio
ns w
ould
be
nece
ssar
y:
� C
lose
Airp
ort P
erim
eter
Roa
d lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
appr
oach
to R
unw
ay 9
R
� R
eloc
ate
Airp
ort S
urve
illan
ce R
adar
9 (A
SR
-9)
� A
cqui
re a
ll or
a p
ortio
n of
the
Wyn
dham
For
t La
uder
dale
-Hol
lyw
ood
Airp
ort
Hot
el
loca
ted
at 1
870
Grif
fin R
oad
Fort
Laud
erda
le, F
lorid
a to
acc
omm
odat
e a
porti
on o
f th
e ex
istin
g st
ruct
ure
that
wou
ld b
e lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
Pro
pose
d R
unw
ay P
rote
ctio
n Zo
ne (R
PZ)
for e
xten
ded
Run
way
9R
/27L
� P
artia
l dis
plac
emen
t of t
he J
et C
ente
r fac
ilitie
s du
e to
pot
entia
l use
of a
taxi
way
as
a te
mpo
rary
runw
ay d
urin
g co
nstru
ctio
n of
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n
� Fu
ll di
spla
cem
ent
of t
he G
ulfs
tream
Airw
ays
airc
raft
mai
nten
ance
fac
ilitie
s du
e to
po
tent
ial
use
of a
tax
iway
as
a te
mpo
rary
run
way
dur
ing
cons
truct
ion
of t
he
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
3
3.0
POTE
NTI
AL
WET
LAN
D IM
PAC
TS F
RO
M T
HE
PRO
POSE
D
AC
TIO
N
Det
aile
d de
scrip
tions
of a
ll w
etla
nds
loca
ted
in th
e D
etai
led
Stu
dy A
rea
that
are
affe
cted
by
the
B1c
Alte
rnat
ive
are
prov
ided
as
App
endi
x B
,Des
crip
tions
of A
ffect
ed W
etla
nds
in th
e D
etai
led
Stu
dy A
rea
for t
he B
1c A
ltern
ativ
e. T
he d
escr
iptio
ns w
ere
deve
lope
d as
a
resu
lt of
fiel
d w
ork
cond
ucte
d by
the
EIS
team
to d
ocum
ent c
ondi
tions
and
to c
olle
ct
requ
ired
data
to
deve
lop
Uni
form
Miti
gatio
n A
sses
smen
t M
etho
d (U
MA
M)
scor
es.
UM
AM
spr
eads
heet
s w
ere
prov
ided
to th
e re
gula
tory
age
ncie
s at
an
Aug
ust 1
0, 2
006
field
vis
it to
all
of th
e w
etla
nd s
ites.
UM
AM
sco
res
wer
e su
bseq
uent
ly m
odifi
ed d
urin
g a
Sep
tem
ber
13,
2006
tel
econ
fere
nce
held
with
rep
rese
ntat
ives
of
the
Bro
war
d C
ount
y E
nviro
nmen
tal P
rote
ctio
n D
epar
tmen
t (B
CE
PD
), th
e S
outh
Flo
rida
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t D
istri
ct (
SFW
MD
), th
e U
.S.
Env
ironm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
Age
ncy
(US
EP
A),
and
the
U.S
. A
rmy
Cor
ps o
f Eng
inee
rs (U
SA
CE
). T
he m
odifi
ed U
MA
M s
core
s w
ere
gene
rally
agr
eed
to b
y al
l age
ncie
s pa
rtici
patin
g in
the
tel
econ
fere
nce,
and
a m
eetin
g su
mm
ary
of t
hat
tele
conf
eren
ce is
pro
vide
d as
Atta
chm
ent 3
-1.
3.1
Dire
ct Im
pact
sD
irect
im
pact
s of
15.
41 a
cres
wou
ld r
esul
t fro
m f
ill, e
rosi
on,
sedi
men
tatio
n, a
nd t
he
clea
ring
of v
eget
atio
n as
soci
ated
with
the
expa
nsio
n of
Run
way
9R
/27L
, the
inst
alla
tion
of
the
runw
ay
appr
oach
lig
hts,
an
d th
e as
soci
ated
ac
cess
ro
ads
to
the
east
. R
edev
elop
men
t of R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L w
ould
impa
ct 0
.61
acre
s of
W-1
7a, 2
.81
acre
s of
W-
17b,
2.6
7 ac
res
of W
-17c
, 5.3
7 ac
res
of W
-33,
2.8
3 ac
res
of W
-N3a
, and
0.7
4 ac
res
of
W-N
3b.
The
se i
mpa
cts
wou
ld r
esul
t in
the
fol
low
ing
UM
AM
Fun
ctio
nal
Gai
n (F
G)
cred
its n
eede
d fo
r m
itiga
tion:
0.1
6 cr
edits
for
W-1
7a,
1.03
cre
dits
for
W-1
7b,
1.25
cr
edits
for W
-17c
, 1.7
9 cr
edits
for W
-33,
0.8
5 cr
edits
for W
-N3a
, and
0.3
0 cr
edits
for W
-N
3b.
Furth
er e
ast,
the
inst
alla
tion
of th
e ru
nway
app
roac
h lig
hts
and
asso
ciat
ed a
cces
s ro
ads
wou
ld im
pact
0.2
0 ac
res
of W
-25a
and
0.1
8 ac
res
to W
-25b
, res
ultin
g in
0.1
2 an
d 0.
13
FG c
redi
ts n
eede
d fo
r m
itiga
tion,
res
pect
ivel
y.
Dire
ct w
etla
nd im
pact
s fro
m A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c w
ould
resu
lt in
a to
tal o
f 5.6
3 U
MA
M F
G c
redi
ts n
eede
d fo
r miti
gatio
n.Ta
ble
3.3-
1pr
ovid
es a
sum
mar
y of
thi
s da
ta.
Atta
chm
ent
3.1-
1 gr
aphi
cally
dep
icts
the
lim
its o
f di
stur
banc
e an
d im
pact
s to
wet
land
s ex
pect
ed fr
om th
e co
nstru
ctio
n of
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
.
The
runw
ay a
ppro
ach
light
sys
tem
at
the
wes
tern
end
of
Run
way
9R
/27L
wou
ld b
e co
nstru
cted
by
inst
allin
g ca
bles
und
er th
e D
ania
Cut
-Off
Can
al to
avo
id im
pact
s to
the
cana
l and
adj
acen
t tria
ngul
ar m
arin
e w
ater
body
. Th
ese
cabl
es w
ould
be
inst
alle
d us
ing
dire
ctio
nal d
rillin
g or
a c
ompa
rabl
e m
etho
d w
hich
avo
ids
impa
cts
to th
e ca
nal b
otto
m a
s w
ell
as t
he a
ssoc
iate
d aq
uatic
hab
itat
adja
cent
to
and
with
in t
he c
anal
. A
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
of th
e in
stal
latio
n of
the
appr
oach
ligh
t sys
tem
to s
uppo
rt R
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L is
ap
pend
ed
to
this
co
ncep
tual
m
itiga
tion
plan
as
A
ppen
dix
A,
Des
crip
tion
of
the
Inst
alla
tion
of th
e R
unw
ay A
ppro
ach
Ligh
t Sys
tem
for A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
4
3.2
Seco
ndar
y Im
pact
s In
add
ition
to d
irect
impa
cts,
the
FAA
ass
esse
d po
tent
ial s
econ
dary
impa
cts
to w
etla
nds
that
cou
ld o
ccur
with
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
. A
buf
fer z
one
exte
ndin
g 25
fe
et o
ut f
rom
the
lim
its o
f di
stur
banc
e w
as u
sed
to a
sses
s fo
r po
ssib
le s
econ
dary
im
pact
s to
wet
land
s in
acc
orda
nce
with
met
hodo
logi
es d
escr
ibed
in th
e S
FWM
D’s
Bas
is
of R
evie
w f
or E
nviro
nmen
tal
Res
ourc
e P
erm
it A
pplic
atio
ns W
ithin
the
Sou
th F
lorid
a W
ater
M
anag
emen
t D
istri
ct,
July
20
07;
the
exce
rpte
d se
ctio
n is
pr
ovid
ed
as
Atta
chm
ent 3
.2-1
to th
is c
once
ptua
l miti
gatio
n pl
an.
A s
econ
dary
impa
ct w
as g
ener
ally
as
sum
ed t
o be
a d
ecre
ase
in v
alue
to
wet
land
s oc
curr
ing
with
in 2
5 fe
et d
ue t
o cl
ose
prox
imity
to d
istu
rbed
are
as.
UM
AM
FG
cre
dits
req
uire
d to
com
pens
ate
for
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s w
ere
calc
ulat
ed u
sing
the
sam
e sc
ores
as
wer
e us
ed to
ass
ess
dire
ct im
pact
s,
deriv
ing
a co
nser
vativ
e es
timat
e of
tota
l miti
gatio
n re
quire
d fo
r the
pro
ject
.
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
wou
ld in
clud
e th
e co
nstru
ctio
n of
a r
etai
ning
wal
l app
roxi
mat
ely
45 fe
et
abov
e m
ean
sea
leve
l run
ning
adj
acen
t to
the
affe
cted
wet
land
s to
the
sout
h of
Run
way
9R
/27L
(W
-N3a
, W
-N3b
, an
d W
-33)
. T
he p
ropo
sed
limits
of
dist
urba
nce
incl
ude
a te
mpo
rary
con
stru
ctio
n zo
ne e
xten
ding
at
leas
t 25
fee
t fro
m t
he e
dge
of t
he r
etai
ning
w
all.
The
con
stru
ctio
n zo
ne w
ill be
lan
dsca
ped
and
mai
ntai
ned
as o
pen
spac
e at
co
mpl
etio
n of
the
proj
ect,
prov
idin
g a
buffe
r of a
t lea
st 2
5 fe
et fr
om th
e re
mai
ning
are
as
of W
-N3a
, W-N
3b, a
nd W
-33.
O
utsi
de o
f thi
s bu
ffer,
a 25
-foot
sec
onda
ry im
pact
are
a w
as d
efin
ed a
nd a
sses
sed.
As
a re
sult,
0.2
2 ac
res
of W
-33,
0.0
9 ac
res
of W
-N3a
, and
0.
24 a
cres
of
W-N
3b c
ould
rec
eive
pos
sibl
e se
cond
ary
impa
cts
due
to t
heir
clos
e pr
oxim
ity to
the
corr
idor
. Th
ese
impa
cts
wou
ld re
sult
in 0
.07,
0.0
3, a
nd 0
.10
FG c
redi
ts
need
ed
for
miti
gatio
n,
resp
ectiv
ely.
Atta
chm
ent
3.2-
2 gr
aphi
cally
di
spla
ys
the
seco
ndar
y im
pact
lim
its f
or W
-N3a
, W
-N3b
, an
d W
-33.
Th
e sh
ort-t
erm
tem
pora
ry
real
ignm
ent
of U
S-1
dur
ing
cons
truct
ion
of A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c (
also
sho
wn
grap
hica
lly in
A
ttach
men
t 3.2
-2) w
ould
not
resu
lt in
sec
onda
ry im
pact
s to
W-N
2a o
r W-N
2b, a
s th
ese
area
s w
ould
be
retu
rned
to p
re-c
onst
ruct
ion
cond
ition
s.
The
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n co
uld
also
res
ult
in p
ossi
ble
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s to
wet
land
s W
-25
a, W
-25b
, and
W-8
due
to th
eir p
roxi
mity
to th
e ap
proa
ch li
ght s
yste
m a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ac
cess
road
s to
the
east
and
wes
t of r
unw
ay 9
R/2
7L. T
he a
cces
s ro
ads
are
need
ed fo
r m
aint
enan
ce o
f th
e ap
proa
ch l
ight
stru
ctur
es,
incl
udin
g m
onth
ly v
isua
l op
erat
iona
l in
spec
tions
of a
ll lig
hts,
as
wel
l as
annu
al s
afet
y, te
chni
cal,
and
alig
nmen
t ins
pect
ions
. O
ther
spe
cial
act
iviti
es t
hat
wou
ld o
ccur
les
s fre
quen
tly i
nclu
de e
mer
genc
y la
mp
repl
acem
ent a
nd v
eget
atio
n co
ntro
l.
To t
he e
ast,
the
appr
oach
ligh
t st
ruct
ures
wou
ld b
e ac
cess
ed v
ia a
12-
foot
-wid
e ro
ad
cons
truct
ed
of
crus
hed
shel
l or
gr
avel
w
ith
an
addi
tiona
l 9
feet
on
ea
ch
side
ac
com
mod
atin
g st
orm
wat
er t
reat
men
t. T
his
30-fo
ot-w
ide
corri
dor
wou
ld e
xten
d in
to
porti
ons
of W
-25a
and
W-2
5b,
resu
lting
in
the
dire
ct i
mpa
cts
addr
esse
d ab
ove.
S
econ
dary
impa
cts
to 0
.39
acre
s of
W-2
5a a
nd 0
.41
acre
s of
W-2
5b c
ould
occ
ur d
ue to
th
eir
prox
imity
to
the
prop
osed
lig
htin
g ac
cess
cor
ridor
.Ta
ble
3.3-
1 pr
ovid
es a
su
mm
ary
of t
his
data
.A
ttach
men
t 3.
2-3
grap
hica
lly d
ispl
ays
the
limits
of
the
acce
ss
corri
dor a
nd s
econ
dary
impa
cts
to W
-25a
and
W-2
5b.
Thes
e se
cond
ary
impa
cts
wou
ld
resu
lt in
0.2
3 an
d 0.
30 F
G c
redi
ts n
eede
d fo
r miti
gatio
n, re
spec
tivel
y.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
5
To th
e w
est,
a si
mila
r roa
d w
ould
be
need
ed to
acc
ess
two
light
stru
ctur
es s
outh
of W
-8.
Whi
le t
his
corri
dor
wou
ld b
e co
nstru
cted
com
plet
ely
in u
plan
ds,
it w
ould
be
loca
ted
with
in 2
5 fe
et o
f W
-8,
resu
lting
in
0.07
acr
es o
f po
tent
ial
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s to
thi
s w
etla
nd a
nd 0
.04
FG c
redi
ts n
eede
d fo
r m
itiga
tion.
Atta
chm
ent
3.2-
4 gr
aphi
cally
di
spla
ys th
e lim
its o
f the
acc
ess
corr
idor
and
sec
onda
ry im
pact
s to
W-8
. C
able
s fo
r the
ap
proa
ch li
ghts
wou
ld b
e in
stal
led
unde
rgro
und
in P
VC
pip
es.
Cro
ssin
g th
e D
ania
Cut
-of
f Can
al w
ould
be
acco
mpl
ishe
d by
dire
ctio
nal d
rillin
g un
der
the
cana
l, ad
jace
nt w
ater
bo
dy,
and
shor
elin
e w
etla
nds,
em
ergi
ng a
t th
e su
rface
at
leas
t 25
fee
t fro
m t
he
shor
elin
e w
etla
nds
on e
ither
sid
e, a
void
ing
any
impa
cts
to th
ese
area
s.
3.3
Tota
l Wet
land
Impa
cts
Tabl
e 3.
3-1
sum
mar
izes
the
wet
land
s th
at c
ould
rec
eive
dire
ct a
nd/o
r se
cond
ary
impa
cts
from
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
. Th
is ta
ble
incl
udes
the
wet
land
type
, th
e to
tal a
cres
of d
irect
and
sec
onda
ry im
pact
s, a
nd th
e U
MA
M F
G c
redi
ts r
equi
red
to
prov
ide
com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion
for
impa
cts
to e
ach
of th
e af
fect
ed w
etla
nds.
U
MA
M
scor
e sh
eets
for
dire
ct a
nd s
econ
dary
im
pact
s to
wet
land
s ex
pect
ed f
or t
he B
1c
Alte
rnat
ive
are
prov
ided
as
Atta
chm
ents
3.3
-1 a
nd3.
3-2,
resp
ectiv
ely.
The
UM
AM
FG
cr
edits
nee
ded
show
n in
Tab
le 3
.3-1
are
equ
ival
ent t
o th
e Fu
nctio
nal L
oss
(FL)
sco
res
calc
ulat
ed in
the
UM
AM
sco
re s
heet
s.4
Tabl
e 3.
3-1
Pot
entia
l Wet
land
Impa
cts
for t
he P
ropo
sed
Act
ion
(Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
)
Impa
ct A
cres
U
MA
M F
unct
iona
l Gai
n (F
G) C
redi
ts N
eede
d W
etla
nd
IDW
etla
nd T
ype
Tota
lA
cres
D
irect
Im
pact
Seco
ndar
y Im
pact
Dire
ct
Impa
ctSe
cond
ary
Impa
ctW
-8
Man
grov
e 2.
670.
000.
070.
000.
04W
-17a
Exo
tic0.
610.
610.
000.
160.
00W
-17b
Exo
tic2.
812.
810.
001.
030.
00W
-17c
Man
grov
e/E
xotic
2.
672.
670.
001.
250.
00W
-25a
Man
grov
e 8.
920.
200.
390.
120.
23W
-25b
Man
grov
e 22
.80
0.18
0.41
0.13
0.30
W-3
3E
xotic
8.59
5.37
0.22
1.79
0.07
W-N
3aE
xotic
2.95
2.83
0.09
0.85
0.03
W-N
3b
Tree
Far
m/P
rairi
e 5.
650.
740.
240.
300.
10A
cres
To
tal =
57
.67
Impa
ct A
cres
To
tal =
16.
83
UM
AM
FG
Cre
dits
Nee
ded
Tota
l = 6
.40
Sou
rce:
San
dra
Wal
ters
Con
sulta
nts,
Inc.
, 200
8.
4 O
ther
wet
land
s id
entif
ied
in th
e D
etai
led
Stu
dy A
rea
(i.e.
W-N
4, W
-N5,
W-N
2a, a
nd W
-N2b
) ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
th
is a
naly
sis
beca
use
no d
irect
or s
econ
dary
impa
cts
are
expe
cted
to o
ccur
to th
ese
wet
land
s as
a re
sult
of th
e B
1c A
ltern
ativ
e.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
6
4.0
CO
NC
EPTU
AL
MIT
IGA
TIO
N
Bro
war
d C
ount
y ha
s in
dica
ted
to t
he F
AA
tha
t th
e C
ount
y in
tend
s to
use
miti
gatio
n cr
edits
est
ablis
hed
at W
est
Lake
Par
k, i
n U
SA
CE
per
mit
no.
SA
J-20
02-0
0072
and
S
FWM
D p
erm
it no
. 06
-040
16-P
, to
com
pens
ate
for
dire
ct a
nd s
econ
dary
wet
land
im
pact
s re
sulti
ng fr
om th
e P
ropo
sed
Act
ion.
56
The
perm
its in
clud
e a
proj
ect p
lan
and
the
UM
AM
FG
sco
res
gene
rate
d by
the
enha
ncem
ent,
crea
tion,
and
rest
orat
ion
proj
ects
oc
curri
ng a
t the
par
k.7
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
is a
1,5
22-a
cre
park
loc
ated
to
the
east
and
sou
th o
f FL
L an
d is
cu
rren
tly m
anag
ed b
y th
e B
row
ard
Cou
nty
Par
ks a
nd R
ecre
atio
n D
ivis
ion
(BC
PR
D).
Th
e pa
rk in
clud
es m
angr
ove,
sea
gras
s, m
ud fl
at, u
plan
d, a
nd o
pen
wat
er c
omm
uniti
es
as w
ell
as o
ver
65 a
cres
of
exot
ic p
lant
-dom
inat
ed a
reas
in
addi
tion
to v
ario
us
recr
eatio
nal
faci
litie
s.
Tabl
e 4-
1 pr
ovid
es a
sum
mar
y of
the
est
imat
ed m
angr
ove
miti
gatio
n cr
edits
ava
ilabl
e ac
cord
ing
to th
e U
SA
CE
per
mit.
Tabl
e 4-
1 Es
timat
ed M
angr
ove
Miti
gatio
n C
redi
ts A
vaila
ble
at W
est L
ake
Park
Act
ivity
Pr
ojec
t Typ
e Si
ze (a
cres
)M
itiga
tion
Cre
dit
(Fun
ctio
nal G
ain
(FG
) C
redi
t)
Man
grov
e pr
otec
tion
and
enha
ncem
ent
by ri
prap
pla
cem
ent
Enh
ance
men
t 24
.06.
24
Man
grov
e pr
otec
tion
by ri
prap
su
pple
men
t E
nhan
cem
ent
8.0
2.08
Con
vers
ion
of s
poil
isla
nd/e
xotic
do
min
ated
upl
and
area
C
reat
ion
22.2
10.4
3
Man
grov
e cr
eatio
n fro
m D
ania
Cut
off
Can
al (o
pen
wat
er)
Cre
atio
n 2.
00.
42
Man
grov
e ou
tpar
cel a
cqui
sitio
n (o
utsi
de
of im
prov
emen
t are
as)
Pre
serv
atio
n 23
.31.
40
Acr
es T
otal
=
79.5
M
angr
ove
FG C
redi
t To
tal =
20.
57
Sou
rce:
U.S
. Arm
y C
orps
of E
ngin
eers
, Per
mit
SA
J-20
02-0
0072
, 200
6
Acc
ordi
ng t
o th
e U
SA
CE
per
mit,
the
re a
re a
n es
timat
ed 2
0.57
man
grov
e m
itiga
tion
cred
its
avai
labl
e fo
r B
row
ard
Cou
nty
base
d on
th
e cr
eatio
n,
enha
ncem
ent,
and
pres
erva
tion
proj
ects
per
mitt
ed a
t Wes
t Lak
e P
ark.
Th
e as
sess
men
t per
form
ed b
y th
e S
FWM
D r
esul
ted
in a
hig
her
man
grov
e cr
edit
tota
l (3
8.79
man
grov
e FG
cre
dits
av
aila
ble)
; ho
wev
er,
the
US
AC
E n
umbe
rs a
re s
how
n he
re a
s th
e m
inim
um e
stim
ated
cr
edits
ava
ilabl
e fo
r the
pur
pose
s of
this
con
cept
ual p
lan.
5 S
ourc
e: B
row
ard
Cou
nty
Avi
atio
n D
epar
tmen
t (B
CA
D)
lette
r to
the
FAA
dat
ed D
ecem
ber
4, 2
007
rega
rdin
g th
e us
e of
wet
land
miti
gatio
n cr
edits
at W
est L
ake
Par
k fo
r Airp
ort S
pons
or’s
Pro
pose
d P
roje
ct, 2
007.
6
U
SA
CE
SA
J-20
02-0
0072
issu
ed M
arch
2, 2
006
and
SFW
MD
06-
0401
6-P
issu
ed A
pril
22, 2
004.
7
Wes
t Lak
e Pa
rk M
itiga
tion
Plan
and
UM
AM s
core
s w
ere
prod
uced
by
Mill
er L
egg
and
Ass
ocia
tes
and
incl
uded
in
the
US
AC
E a
nd S
FWM
D p
erm
its S
AJ-
2002
-000
72 a
nd 0
6-04
016-
P, 2
006.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
7
Bro
war
d C
ount
y pr
opos
es to
use
a p
ortio
n of
thes
e cr
edits
to c
ompe
nsat
e fo
r dire
ct a
nd
seco
ndar
y w
etla
nd im
pact
s th
at w
ould
occ
ur w
ith t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
of A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c.
No
FG c
redi
ts h
ave
yet
been
app
lied;
the
refo
re,
all f
unct
iona
l gai
n cr
edits
incl
uded
in
Tabl
e 4-
1 re
mai
n av
aila
ble.
8
As
stat
ed in
the
Dra
ft E
IS,
Wet
land
33
(W-3
3) is
a f
resh
wat
er w
etla
nd d
omin
ated
by
Bra
zilia
n P
eppe
r. U
SA
CE
and
SFW
MD
sta
ff ag
reed
con
cept
ually
to th
e us
e of
out
-of-
kind
miti
gatio
n cr
edit
at W
est L
ake
Par
k to
com
pens
ate
for i
mpa
cts
to W
-33.
9
The
perm
its fo
r the
Wes
t Lak
e P
ark
miti
gatio
n pr
ojec
t req
uire
an
indi
vidu
al a
sses
smen
t of
eac
h C
ount
y pr
ojec
t in
volv
ing
impa
cts
and
a pe
rmit
mod
ifica
tion
to t
he W
est
Lake
pe
rmits
be
acqu
ired
to a
pply
FG
cre
dits
to
the
spec
ific
UM
AM
fun
ctio
nal l
oss
scor
es.
Ther
efor
e,
in
the
case
of
w
etla
nd
impa
cts
resu
lting
fro
m
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l res
ourc
e pe
rmit
(ER
P)
appl
icat
ions
wou
ld b
e su
bmitt
ed t
o th
e S
FWM
D
and
US
AC
E a
long
with
an
appl
icat
ion
for
a W
est
Lake
Par
k pe
rmit
mod
ifica
tion
to
allo
cate
6.4
0 FG
cre
dits
to
com
pens
ate
for
the
16.8
3 ac
res
of u
navo
idab
le d
irect
and
se
cond
ary
impa
cts
to w
etla
nds
from
con
stru
ctio
n of
Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
. M
itiga
tion
cred
its
wou
ld t
hen
be a
ssig
ned
to t
his
proj
ect
upon
app
rova
l of
the
se a
pplic
atio
ns b
y th
e re
gula
tory
age
ncie
s.
5.0
MIT
IGA
TIO
N M
ON
ITO
RIN
G
Mon
itorin
g pl
ans
for
the
ecol
ogic
al s
ucce
ss o
f miti
gatio
n pr
ojec
ts a
t Wes
t Lak
e P
ark
is
prov
ided
for
in W
est
Lake
Par
k U
SA
CE
Per
mit
Spe
cial
Con
ditio
n 14
and
in S
FWM
D
Per
mit
Spe
cial
Con
ditio
n 27
. A
ccor
ding
to
the
perm
its,
miti
gatio
n m
onito
ring
will
tak
e pl
ace
for
five
year
s, w
ith a
nnua
l rep
orts
sub
mitt
ed to
the
US
AC
E a
nd S
FWM
D.
At t
he
end
of th
e fiv
e-ye
ar m
onito
ring
perio
d th
ere
mus
t be
80 p
erce
nt s
urvi
val a
nd 8
0 pe
rcen
t co
vera
ge o
f des
irabl
e pl
ant s
peci
es s
uita
ble
to th
e m
itiga
tion
area
, and
if th
is s
tand
ard
is n
ot m
et, f
urth
er re
stor
atio
n w
ork
will
be re
quire
d. T
here
fore
, the
mon
itorin
g pl
an th
at
wou
ld b
e re
quire
d fo
r of
fsite
com
pens
ator
y m
itiga
tion
for
the
Pro
pose
d A
ctio
n is
ad
dres
sed
by t
he e
xist
ing
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
spec
ial c
ondi
tions
spe
cifie
d in
the
US
AC
E
and
SFW
MD
per
mits
.
6.0
MIT
IGA
TIO
N C
OM
PLIA
NC
E SC
HED
ULE
Tabl
e 6-
1 pr
ovid
es a
pro
pose
d co
mpl
ianc
e sc
hedu
le fo
r the
mon
itorin
g pl
ans
incl
uded
in
the
afor
emen
tione
d U
SA
CE
and
SFW
MD
per
mits
for
Wes
t La
ke P
ark.
Th
e or
igin
al
com
plia
nce
sche
dule
as
desc
ribed
in t
he p
erm
its w
as a
djus
ted
base
d on
dis
cuss
ions
8 S
ourc
e: J
anua
ry 2
2, 2
008
tele
phon
e co
nfer
ence
with
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
Man
ager
Pat
You
ng.
Inf
orm
atio
n pr
ovid
ed b
y S
andr
a W
alte
rs C
onsu
ltant
s, In
c. 2
008.
9
Sum
mar
y of
a S
epte
mbe
r 13
, 20
06 t
elep
hone
con
fere
nce
with
reg
ulat
ory
agen
cy r
epre
sent
ativ
es t
o de
velo
p co
ncur
renc
e on
UM
AM
sco
res
for
FLL
runw
ay e
xten
sion
EIS
pro
vide
d by
San
dra
Wal
ters
Con
sulta
nts,
Inc
. 20
06.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
8
with
Ms.
Pat
ricia
You
ng,
man
ager
of
Wes
t La
ke P
ark.
M
s. Y
oung
info
rmed
the
FA
A
that
miti
gatio
n pr
ojec
ts a
t Wes
t Lak
e P
ark,
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e U
SA
CE
and
SFW
MD
pe
rmits
, are
pro
ject
ed to
beg
in in
Jan
uary
200
9. 10
Tabl
e 6-
1 Pr
opos
ed P
erm
it C
ompl
ianc
e Sc
hedu
le
Perm
it A
ctiv
ities
D
ates
in P
erm
it A
djus
ted
Dat
es
Beg
in E
arth
wor
k 6/
2005
1/20
09C
ompl
ete
Ear
thw
ork
6/20
081/
2012
Beg
in P
lant
ing
7/20
082/
2012
Com
plet
e P
lant
ing
7/20
092/
2013
Sub
mit
Tim
e-Ze
ro M
onito
ring
Rep
ort
8/20
093/
2013
Sub
mit
Firs
t Ann
ual M
onito
ring
Rep
ort
9/20
104/
2014
Sub
mit
Sec
ond
Ann
ual M
onito
ring
Rep
ort
9/20
114/
2015
Sub
mit
Third
Ann
ual M
onito
ring
Rep
ort
9/20
124/
2016
Sub
mit
Four
th A
nnua
l Mon
itorin
g R
epor
t 9/
2013
4/20
17S
ubm
it Fi
fth A
nnua
l Mon
itorin
g R
epor
t 9/
2014
4/20
18S
ourc
e: S
andr
a W
alte
rs C
onsu
ltant
s, In
c., 2
008.
7.0
CO
MPL
ETIO
N O
F TH
E FA
A E
IS P
RO
CES
S A
ND
PR
OPO
SED
C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N
The
FAA
ant
icip
ates
iss
uing
a F
inal
EIS
in
the
sum
mer
of
2008
with
a R
ecor
d of
D
ecis
ion
late
r in
the
fall.
The
FA
A w
ill id
entif
y th
e P
refe
rred
Alte
rnat
ive
in th
e Fi
nal E
IS.
Con
stru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es c
ould
beg
in u
pon
com
plet
ion
of d
esig
n w
ork
with
con
stru
ctio
n oc
curr
ing
thro
ugh
2012
.
The
proj
ecte
d pr
ojec
t op
enin
g da
te
is
the
2012
-201
3 tim
efra
me.
10
Sou
rce:
Jan
uary
22,
200
8 te
leph
one
conf
eren
ce w
ith W
est
Lake
Par
k M
anag
er P
at Y
oung
. I
nfor
mat
ion
prov
ided
by
San
dra
Wal
ters
Con
sulta
nts,
Inc.
200
8.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
1
APP
END
IX A
D
escr
iptio
n of
the
Inst
alla
tion
of th
eR
unw
ay A
ppro
ach
Ligh
t Sys
tem
for A
ltern
ativ
e B
1c
Inst
alla
tion
of R
unw
ay A
ppro
ach
Ligh
ts fo
r Exp
ande
d R
unw
ay 9
R
The
prop
osed
ins
talla
tion
of c
able
s be
neat
h th
e D
ania
Cut
-Off
Can
al t
o su
ppor
t th
e pr
opos
ed a
ppro
ach
runw
ay li
ghtin
g sy
stem
to
the
wes
t of
Run
way
9R
wou
ld b
e do
ne
via
horiz
onta
l dril
ling
(or
othe
r co
mpa
rabl
e m
etho
d) a
nd w
ould
not
pen
etra
te th
e D
ania
C
ut-O
ff C
anal
bot
tom
. E
ach
appr
oach
ligh
t tow
er w
ould
be
conn
ecte
d w
ith a
ser
ies
of
elec
trica
l ca
bles
. T
he c
ablin
g w
ould
be
enca
sed
in c
ondu
it an
d bu
ried
seve
ral
feet
be
neat
h th
e gr
ound
sur
face
. T
he c
ablin
g be
twee
n lig
ht t
ower
s w
ould
be
inst
alle
d th
roug
h op
en tr
ench
ing
in u
plan
ds.
Hor
izon
tal o
r di
rect
iona
l dril
ling,
or
sim
ilar
met
hod,
w
ould
be
used
to
inst
all t
he c
able
s un
der
the
Dan
ia C
ut-O
ff C
anal
. T
his
inst
alla
tion
met
hod
wou
ld a
void
pen
etra
ting
the
botto
m o
f the
can
al.
Loca
tion
of th
e ca
bles
in th
e vi
cini
ty o
f th
e D
ania
Cut
-Off
Can
al w
ould
be
coor
dina
ted
with
the
US
AC
E a
nd t
he
SFW
MD
due
to th
eir p
lann
ed w
iden
ing
and
deep
enin
g of
the
Dan
ia C
ut-O
ff C
anal
not
ed
in t
he U
SA
CE
EIS
for
the
Fea
sibi
lity
Stu
dy o
f N
avig
atio
nal
Impr
ovem
ents
at
Por
t E
verg
lade
s, B
row
ard
Cou
nty,
Flo
rida.
The
sepa
ratio
n be
twee
n ap
proa
ch li
ght t
ower
s w
ould
be
adju
sted
to a
void
pla
cing
the
tow
ers
with
in th
e D
ania
Cut
-Off
Can
al.
In a
dditi
on, t
he a
ppro
ach
light
tow
ers,
wes
t of
Run
way
9R
, w
ould
be
loca
ted
in u
plan
ds a
nd/o
r at
tach
ed t
o th
e H
ilton
(fo
rmer
ly
Wyn
dham
) H
otel
par
king
gar
age.
Th
eref
ore,
exp
ansi
on o
f R
unw
ay 9
R w
ould
not
im
pact
the
Dan
ia C
ut-O
ff C
anal
or W
-8 fo
r Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
.
The
appr
oach
ligh
t sys
tem
that
sup
ports
Run
way
9R
wou
ld b
e ac
cess
ed v
ia a
n ex
istin
g se
rvic
e ro
ad a
long
the
wes
t ban
k of
the
Dan
ia C
ut-O
ff C
anal
and
a n
ewly
con
stru
cted
se
rvic
e ro
ad fr
om th
e sh
ould
er o
f I-9
5.
Inst
alla
tion
of R
unw
ay A
ppro
ach
Ligh
ts fo
r Exp
ande
d R
unw
ay 2
7L
The
top
of th
e ap
proa
ch li
ght t
ower
s of
f the
eas
t end
of R
unw
ay 2
7L a
nd e
ast o
f NE
7th
Ave
nue,
wou
ld b
e 35
to
40 f
eet
abov
e gr
ound
lev
el.
Due
to
thei
r he
ight
, ea
ch l
ight
to
wer
wou
ld n
eed
to b
e su
ppor
ted
by th
ree
conc
rete
foun
datio
ns, e
ach
with
a ra
dius
of
thre
e fe
et.
The
se f
ound
atio
ns w
ould
be
cons
truct
ed in
a t
riang
ular
con
figur
atio
n w
ith
appr
oxim
atel
y fiv
e fe
et o
f sep
arat
ion
betw
een
the
foun
datio
n ce
nter
s. T
he p
lace
men
t of
thes
e lig
ht t
ower
s w
ould
im
pact
W-2
5a.
The
ins
talla
tion
of t
hese
app
roac
h lig
ht
foun
datio
ns w
ould
cau
se a
tem
pora
ry d
istu
rban
ce to
W-2
5a.
The
dist
urba
nce
resu
lting
fro
m c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e fo
unda
tions
cou
ld e
xten
d ap
prox
imat
ely
15 to
30
feet
bey
ond
the
foun
datio
ns,
due
to
exca
vatio
n ac
tiviti
es
and
the
oper
atio
n of
co
nstru
ctio
n eq
uipm
ent.
The
serv
ice
road
for t
he a
ppro
ach
light
tow
ers
that
sup
port
Run
way
27L
and
loca
ted
to
the
east
of
NE
7th A
venu
e w
ould
ext
end
into
W-2
5a.
Thi
s se
rvic
e ro
ad w
ould
be
equi
pped
with
dra
inag
e st
ruct
ures
to
allo
w t
idal
flo
ws.
Th
e se
rvic
e ro
ad i
s ty
pica
lly
cons
truct
ed o
f gra
vel o
r asp
halt
and
has
a w
idth
of 1
2 to
15
feet
, with
an
addi
tiona
l 25-
foot
dia
met
er tu
rnar
ound
at t
he e
nd.
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
1
APP
END
IX B
D
escr
iptio
ns o
f Affe
cted
Wet
land
sin
the
Det
aile
d St
udy
Are
a fo
r the
B1c
Alte
rnat
ive11
Wet
land
8:
Wet
land
8 (
W-8
) is
loca
ted
sout
h of
the
Dan
ia C
ut-O
ff C
anal
. W
-8 w
as
iden
tifie
d in
pre
viou
s do
cum
ents
as
0.24
acr
es.
W-8
is n
ow id
entif
ied
as b
eing
2.6
7 ac
res,
bas
ed o
n an
alys
is a
nd fi
eld
inve
stig
atio
ns c
ondu
cted
for t
he D
raft
EIS
. W
-8 is
a
man
grov
e w
etla
nd (
FLU
CC
S C
ode
#612
) do
min
ated
by
whi
te m
angr
ove
(Lag
uncu
laria
race
mos
a) w
ith s
ome
blac
k m
angr
oves
(A
vice
nnia
ger
min
ans)
pre
sent
. T
he a
rea
imm
edia
tely
frin
ging
the
Dan
ia C
ut-O
ff C
anal
con
tain
s re
d m
angr
oves
(R
hizo
phor
a m
angl
e).
Bec
ause
of s
hadi
ng fr
om th
e ov
erst
ory
cano
py, t
here
is li
ttle
or n
o un
ders
tory
gr
owth
typi
cal o
f man
grov
e fo
rest
s.
Sin
ce t
he N
ovem
ber
2004
fie
ld in
vest
igat
ion
and
calc
ulat
ion
of t
he U
MA
M s
core
, th
e m
angr
oves
hav
e be
en t
rimm
ed d
own
to r
educ
e th
e ca
nopy
hei
ght
with
in t
he e
xist
ing
appr
oach
to
Run
way
9R
/27L
. A
lar
ge s
torm
wat
er o
utfa
ll pr
esum
ably
fro
m t
he H
ilton
(fo
rmer
ly W
yndh
am)
Hot
el a
nd p
arki
ng g
arag
e di
scha
rges
into
the
sout
heas
t cor
ner
of
W-8
. T
idal
inun
datio
n of
W-8
app
ears
to
be n
eith
er r
egul
ar n
or c
ompl
ete
due
to t
he
pres
ence
of a
par
tial b
erm
bet
wee
n th
e w
etla
nd a
nd th
e op
en w
ater
s of
the
Dan
ia C
ut-
Off
Can
al.
A U
MA
M fu
nctio
nal a
sses
smen
t sco
re o
f 0.5
67 w
as c
alcu
late
d fo
r W-8
.
Wet
land
17:
Wet
land
17
(W-1
7) is
loca
ted
to th
e ea
st o
f U.S
. Hig
hway
1 o
n-ai
rpor
t and
is
bou
nded
by
Tayl
or R
oad
to th
e so
uth
and
the
airp
ort e
ntra
nce
road
way
ram
p to
the
north
. W
-17
was
iden
tifie
d in
pre
viou
s do
cum
ents
as
22.1
7 ac
res,
but
is id
entif
ied
in th
e D
raft
EIS
as
6.09
acr
es.
This
red
uctio
n in
siz
e is
ass
umed
to b
e th
e re
sult
of im
pact
s fro
m p
revi
ousl
y pe
rmitt
ed p
roje
cts.
W
-17
still
cont
ains
som
e m
angr
oves
with
in i
ts
east
ern
area
s, b
ut is
prim
arily
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er, a
nd is
cur
rent
ly s
ever
ed
from
any
tida
l con
nect
ion.
W-1
7 ha
s be
en d
ivid
ed i
nto
sub-
area
s W
-17a
, W
-17b
, an
d W
-17c
to
acco
unt
for
diffe
renc
es in
wet
land
qua
lity.
The
siz
es o
f the
se th
ree
sub-
area
s w
ere
estim
ated
to b
e:
W-1
7a =
0.1
6 ac
res,
W-1
7b =
2.8
1 ac
res
and
W-1
7c =
2.6
7 ac
res.
Cur
rent
con
ditio
ns w
ithin
the
sub
-are
as r
efle
ct a
mix
of
vege
tatio
n in
dica
tive
of a
di
stur
bed
and
hydr
olog
ical
ly-p
oor
wet
land
sys
tem
.U
MA
M f
unct
iona
l as
sess
men
t sc
ores
of
0.26
7, 0
.367
, an
d 0.
467
wer
e ca
lcul
ated
for
W-1
7a,
W-1
7b,
and
W-1
7c,
resp
ectiv
ely.
Wet
land
25:
W
etla
nd 2
5 (W
-25)
, th
e la
rges
t co
ntig
uous
wet
land
with
in t
he D
etai
led
Stu
dy A
rea,
is a
man
grov
e w
etla
nd (
FLU
CC
S C
ode
#612
) lo
cate
d im
med
iate
ly e
ast o
f N
W 7
th A
venu
e.
W-2
5 is
com
pose
d m
ainl
y of
red
man
grov
e, b
lack
man
grov
e, w
hite
m
angr
ove,
and
to a
less
er d
egre
e, b
utto
nwoo
d (C
onoc
arpu
s er
ectu
s).
This
wet
land
is in
ters
pers
ed w
ith a
reas
of B
razi
lian
pepp
er, A
ustra
lian
pine
(C
asua
rina
equi
setif
olia
), an
d ot
her
non-
nativ
e in
vasi
ve
plan
t sp
ecie
s,
parti
cula
rly
with
in
its
11 N
ote:
Des
crip
tions
and
UM
AM
sco
res
for a
ffect
ed w
etla
nds
are
docu
men
ted
in th
e Fi
nal E
IS
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
Fo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
north
wes
tern
reac
hes
and
alon
g its
per
iphe
ry.
The
pres
ence
of i
nvas
ive
spec
ies
is th
e re
sult
of t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
of d
rain
age
ditc
hes,
soi
l di
srup
tion
due
to f
arm
ing,
and
the
di
min
ishe
d re
ach
of ti
dal f
lush
ing
tow
ard
the
north
wes
t cor
ner o
f W-2
5. W
-25
has
been
di
vide
d in
to tw
o su
b-ar
eas,
W-2
5a a
nd W
-25b
, to
acco
unt f
or th
e di
ffere
nces
in w
etla
nd
qual
ity th
at w
ere
obse
rved
. Th
e ac
reag
es fo
r eac
h su
b-ar
ea w
ere
calc
ulat
ed a
s fo
llow
s:
W-2
5a =
8.9
2 ac
res,
W-2
5b =
22.
80 a
cres
.U
MA
M f
unct
iona
l ass
essm
ent
scor
es o
f 0.
600
and
0.73
3 w
ere
calc
ulat
ed fo
r W-2
5a a
nd W
-25b
, res
pect
ivel
y.
Wet
land
33:
Wet
land
33
(W-3
3) is
loca
ted
to th
e ea
st o
f FLL
and
sou
th o
f Tay
lor R
oad.
W-3
3 w
as id
entif
ied
in p
revi
ous
docu
men
ts a
s 0.
82 a
cres
. B
ased
on
field
inve
stig
atio
ns
cond
ucte
d fo
r th
is D
raft
EIS
, W-3
3 w
as e
xpen
ded
to 8
.59
acre
s.
W-3
3 is
a fr
eshw
ater
w
etla
nd, d
omin
ated
by
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
. D
ue to
its
low
ele
vatio
n, it
rece
ives
and
reta
ins
stor
mw
ater
run
off f
rom
the
surr
ound
ing
area
s an
d no
w m
aint
ains
the
requ
isite
wet
land
ch
arac
teris
tics
of h
ydro
logy
, soi
ls, a
nd p
lant
s. A
UM
AM
func
tiona
l ass
essm
ent s
core
of
0.33
3 w
as c
alcu
late
d fo
r W-3
3.
Wet
land
N3:
Wet
land
N3
(W-N
3) is
loca
ted
imm
edia
tely
eas
t of W
-N2,
and
is b
orde
red
by N
E 1
0th
Stre
et o
n th
e so
uth,
Tay
lor R
oad
on th
e no
rthw
est,
and
the
taxi
par
king
are
a on
the
east
. W
-N3
is a
ppro
xim
atel
y 8.
60 a
cres
in s
ize
(FLU
CC
S C
ode
#241
and
#42
2).
The
maj
ority
of
W-N
3 is
use
d as
a t
ree
nurs
ery,
but
con
tinue
s to
exh
ibit
wet
land
ch
arac
teris
tics
and
harb
or n
ativ
e w
etla
nd g
roun
dcov
er.
Bec
ause
of
the
diffe
renc
es in
ha
bita
t typ
es p
rese
nt w
ithin
W-N
3, it
has
bee
n di
vide
d in
to tw
o su
b-ar
eas:
W-N
3a (2
.95
acre
s) a
nd W
-N3b
(5.
65 a
cres
).U
MA
M f
unct
iona
l as
sess
men
t sc
ores
of
0.30
0 an
d 0.
400
wer
e ca
lcul
ated
for W
-N3a
and
W-N
3b, r
espe
ctiv
ely
2
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
D
RA
FTFo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
ATT
AC
HM
ENT
3.1
Sum
mar
y of
Sep
tem
ber 1
3, 2
006
Tele
conf
eren
cew
ith R
egul
ator
y A
genc
ies
to D
evel
opC
oncu
rren
ce o
n U
MA
M S
core
s
Nov
embe
r 15,
200
6
EMA
IL S
WC
INC
@BE
LLSO
UTH
.NET
•W
EBSI
TE W
WW
.SW
CIN
C.N
ET64
10FIF
TH S
TREE
T,SU
ITE 3
,KEY
WES
T,FL
3304
0•
PH30
5-29
4-12
38•
FAX
305-
294-
2164
1031
IVES
DA
IRY
ROA
D,S
UITE
228
,MIA
MI,
FL33
179
•PH
305-
651-
7061
X36
8•
FAX
305-
651-
5732
M E
M O
R A
N D
U M
TO
: FL
L EI
S fil
e
FRO
M:
Stev
e C
arne
y
TH
RO
UG
H:
Sand
ra W
alte
rs
SUB
JEC
T:
Sum
mar
y of
Sep
tem
ber
13, 2
006
tele
phon
e co
nfer
ence
with
reg
ulat
ory
agen
cy
repr
esen
tativ
es t
o de
velo
p co
ncur
renc
e on
Uni
form
Miti
gatio
n A
sses
smen
t M
etho
d (U
MA
M) s
core
s fo
r Ft.
Laud
erda
le In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L) ru
nway
ex
tens
ion
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
Sta
tem
ent (
EIS)
Cal
l Par
ticip
ants
: Le
ah O
berli
n, U
.S. A
rmy
Cor
ps o
f Eng
inee
rs (U
SAC
E)
Rob
Hop
per,
Sout
h Fl
orid
a W
ater
Man
agem
ent D
istri
ct (S
FWM
D)
Lesl
ie
Ber
tolo
tti,
Bro
war
d C
ount
y En
viro
nmen
tal
Prot
ectio
n D
ivis
ion
(BC
EPD
)R
on M
iede
ma,
Env
ironm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
Age
ncy
(EPA
) Sa
ndra
Wal
ters
and
Ste
ve C
arne
y, S
WC
The
follo
win
g ch
ange
s w
ere
mad
e in
the
fun
ctio
nal
loss
UM
AM
sco
res
for
the
wet
land
s th
at
coul
d be
af
fect
ed
by
one
or
mor
e pr
ojec
t al
tern
ativ
es
as
a re
sult
of
the
inte
rage
ncy
tele
conf
eren
ce: C
urre
nt U
MA
M
Cha
nged
UM
AM
W
etla
nd
Scor
e Sc
ore
W-8
0.
567
No
chan
geW
-17a
0.
250
0.26
7 W
-17b
0.
300
0.36
7 W
-17c
0.
433
0.46
7 W
-25a
0.
500
0.60
0 W
-25b
0.
583
0.73
3 W
-33
0.28
3 0.
333
W-N
1 0.
450
0.26
7 (N
ote
Wet
land
W-N
1 w
ill N
OT
be i
mpa
cted
by
any
alte
rnat
ive
and
rese
arch
on
stor
mw
ater
pe
rmitt
ing
foun
d th
at it
is p
art o
f a st
orm
wat
er sy
stem
so is
not
juris
dict
iona
l) W
-N2a
0.
333
0.36
7 W
-N2b
0.
267
0.30
0 W
-N3a
0.
283
0.30
0 W
-N3b
0.
417
0.40
0 W
-N5
0.38
3 0.
400
FLL
EIS
FILE
,NO
VEM
BER
15,
2006
,PA
GE
2
With
few
exc
eptio
ns,
all
wer
e in
crea
sed
mai
nly
in t
he c
ateg
ory
of L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e Su
ppor
t. W
-25
a/b
wen
t up
in
all
thre
e ca
tego
ries
(Wat
er E
nviro
nmen
t an
d C
omm
unity
St
ruct
ure,
as w
ell).
W-8
rem
aine
d un
chan
ged.
Lesl
ie B
erto
lotti
with
BC
EPD
ask
ed to
shift
the
east
ern
boun
dary
of W
-25a
slig
htly
to th
e w
est,
and
will
pro
vide
a sk
etch
show
ing
whe
re sh
e be
lieve
s it s
houl
d be
. Th
eref
ore,
this
shap
e fil
e an
d ca
lcul
atio
ns w
ill b
e re
wor
ked,
and
W-2
5b w
ill,
cons
eque
ntly
, be
inc
reas
ed b
y th
e eq
uiva
lent
am
ount
.
All
agen
cies
agr
eed
they
wan
t sec
onda
ry im
pact
s to
W-2
5 to
be
cons
ider
ed in
the
over
all i
mpa
ct
scor
ing,
as m
ost o
f the
sout
h ru
nway
alte
rnat
ives
will
be
clos
er to
/adj
acen
t to
the
wes
t sid
e of
W-
25, c
ausi
ng W
-25’
s cu
rren
t UM
AM
sco
re to
be
less
in th
e ca
tego
ry o
f Loc
atio
n an
d La
ndsc
ape
Supp
ort.
See
SW
C t
houg
hts
rega
rdin
g ap
proa
ch t
o ac
com
plis
hing
thi
s at
the
bot
tom
of
this
m
emo.
EPA
, and
then
the
othe
rs, r
eque
sted
that
W-N
4 be
rei
nclu
ded
with
its
UM
AM
sco
re b
ecau
se it
w
ill s
ee s
ome
of th
e sa
me
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s de
scrib
ed a
bove
. I s
ugge
sted
that
its
scor
e w
ould
lik
ely
be i
dent
ical
to
W-2
5b,
and
the
agen
cies
agr
eed—
ther
efor
e, w
e ca
n pr
esum
e W
-N4'
s U
MA
M sc
ore
to b
e 0.
733,
as w
ell.
All
agen
cies
wan
ted
to s
ee im
prov
emen
ts/e
nhan
cem
ents
to W
-25
incl
uded
in th
e pr
ojec
t, su
ch a
s im
prov
emen
ts t
o hy
drol
ogic
exc
hang
e, p
artic
ular
ly b
ecau
se o
f th
e po
tent
ial
for
its l
ower
ed
UM
AM
scor
e as
a re
sult
of th
e ru
nway
bei
ng m
uch
clos
er/a
djac
ent t
o it.
We
disc
usse
d th
e ne
ed
for
som
e ou
t-of-
kind
m
itiga
tion
for
fres
hwat
er
wet
land
s to
be
co
mpe
nsat
ed w
ith s
alt
wat
er h
abita
t re
stor
atio
n at
Wes
t La
ke P
ark
(i.e.
, W
-33,
whi
ch i
s fr
eshw
ater
, B p
eppe
r do
min
ated
), an
d a
prec
eden
t fo
r th
is k
ind
of o
ut-o
f-ki
nd m
itiga
tion
was
ap
prov
ed b
y an
othe
r FLL
per
mit.
Bot
h th
e U
SAC
E an
d th
e SF
WM
D s
tate
d th
at, i
n co
njun
ctio
n w
ith e
nhan
cem
ents
to W
-25,
this
did
not
seem
to b
e a
prob
lem
.
95
595Snyder Park
84
31
9R
13
9L
27R
27L
1
1
McIntosh R
d
Griffin Rd
Dania Cut Off Canal
NE
7th
Ave
Old Griffin Rd
Ang
lers
Ave
SW 9
th A
ve
Eller Drive
SW 53 Ct
SE 1
4th
Ave
SW 1
5th
Ave
SW 39th St
SW 4
th A
ve
SW 1
2th
Ave
S Andrew
s Ave
Bry
an R
d
Terminal Dr
NE
3rd
Ave
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood
InternationalAirport
Environmental Impact StatementFort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport
LegendDetailed Study Area
Existing Surface Waters
Existing Wetlands
Impacted AreasAccess Road Impacts
Permanent Airfield Impacts
Temporary Construction Impacts
Limits of DisturbanceRelocated Radar
Disturbed Area Access Road
Disturbed Area Airfield
Disturbed Area Facility Relocations
Disturbed Stormwater Collection System
Disturbed Area Temporary Construction
Disturbed Area Terminal
0 2,0001,000Feet
1/25/08Filename: ENV_FLL\GIS\GIS\SWC\TCG_Alternatives\B1 Revision1\B1bcWetlandsImpacts_Figures2-1-1&3-1-1.mxd
Attachment:
3.1-1Impacts to Wetlands from B1b/c Alternative
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
D
RA
FTFo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
ATT
AC
HM
ENT
3.2-
1
Seco
ndar
y Im
pact
s Se
ctio
n 4-
2-7
from
200
7 SF
WM
D
Bas
is o
f Rev
iew
for E
nviro
nmen
t Res
ourc
e Pe
rmit
App
licat
ions
With
in th
e So
uth
Flor
ida
Wat
er
Man
agem
ent D
istr
ict
W-33
W-N3b
W-N3a
W-N2a
W-N2b
1/15/08 Pr epared bySWCAlternative B1c Secondary Impacts to Wetlands South of the Airfield
DRAFTEnvi ronme ntal Impact Stateme nt
Fort La uderdale -HollywoodI nternat iona lAirportAttachmen t:
3.2-2
LegendExisting Wetlands in Detailed Study Area
Disturbed Area Airfield
Disturbed Area Temporary Construction
Disturbed Area Stormwater Collection System
25 Foot Secondary Impact Buffer
0 150 30075Feet
NE
7th
Ave
W-25b W-N4
W-25a
W-17c
1-11-08 Pr epared bySWCAlternative B1c Secondary Impacts to Wetlands East of the Airfield
DRAFTEnvi ronme ntal Impact Stateme ntFort La uderdale -HollywoodI nternat iona lAirport
Attachmen t:3.2-3
LegendExisting Wetlands in Detailed Study Area
Disturbed Area Airfield
Disturbed Area Access Road
25 Foot Secondary Impact Buffer
0 100 20050Feet
W-8
12/19/07Prepared by SWC Alternative B1c Secondary Impacts to Wetlands West of the AirfieldDRAFT
Envi ronme ntal Impact Stateme ntFort La uderdale -HollywoodI nternat iona lAirport
Attachmen t:3.2-4
LegendExisting Wetlands in Detailed Study Area
Disturbed Area Airfield
Disturbed Area Access Road
25 Foot Secondary Impact Buffer
0 60 12030Feet
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
D
RA
FTFo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
ATT
AC
HM
ENT
3.3-
1
Dire
ct Im
pact
UM
AM
Wet
land
Sco
re S
heet
s fo
r Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wild
life
use
min
imal
bec
ause
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t re
gion
al w
ildlif
e co
rrid
or. M
ovem
ent b
etw
een
surr
ound
ing
parc
els
poss
ible
bu
t spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
s pr
ovid
ed.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ng d
evel
oped
with
road
s, h
ighw
ays,
exi
stin
g ai
rpor
t, ex
istin
g se
apor
t, an
d ot
her n
ew d
evel
opm
ent.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Mos
t wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld
visi
t.N
ot A
pplic
able
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o di
rect
or i
ndire
ct e
vide
nce
of w
ildlif
e us
e w
as o
bser
ved.
Wad
ing
bird
s or
oth
er w
etla
nd w
ildife
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d; n
o pr
ey
base
or e
vide
nce
ther
eof w
as o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it; d
ense
can
opy
limits
wad
ing
bird
acc
ess.
Den
se c
anop
y di
min
ishe
s po
tent
ial A
A
use
for f
eedi
ng b
y w
adin
g bi
rds
and
rapt
ors.
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
This
wet
land
are
a ha
s be
com
e hy
drol
ogic
ally
isol
ated
; con
nect
ion
to W
-25
to th
e ea
st n
o lo
nger
exi
sts.
US
-1 a
nd F
LL fl
anks
the
entir
e su
bjec
t are
a to
the
wes
t. To
the
north
is a
hea
vily
impa
cted
are
a w
ith th
e re
lativ
ely
rece
nt c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e U
S-1
inte
rcha
nge
acce
ssin
g FL
L. T
o th
e ea
st li
e N
E 7
th A
venu
e an
d W
-25.
To
the
sout
h lie
s Ta
ylor
Roa
d. T
hese
land
use
s es
sent
ially
sev
ere
any
wild
life
corr
idor
s an
d re
duce
the
prob
abili
ty th
at
this
site
will
rece
ive
mea
ning
ful w
ildlif
e us
e; s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble.
W-1
7a is
a s
ub-
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
of fo
rmer
W-1
7. W
-17i
s po
or in
qua
lity,
bar
ely
juris
dict
iona
l.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-17a
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
619/
612
Exo
tic W
etla
nd H
ardw
ood/
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Dire
ct Im
pact
0.61
acr
es
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
tria
ngul
ar a
sses
smen
t are
a, a
ppro
xim
atel
y 0.
61 a
cres
in s
ize
reta
inin
g ve
ry fe
w w
etla
nd c
hara
cter
s. A
A w
ill b
e co
mpl
etel
y im
pact
ed b
y co
nstru
ctio
n of
the
sout
h ru
nway
. N
o si
gnifi
cant
wild
life
usag
e w
as n
oted
dur
ing
the
site
vis
it. P
ondi
ng o
r ope
n w
ater
are
as (f
resh
wat
er) l
imite
d to
di
tche
s an
d de
ep d
epre
ssio
ns.
Prio
r to
the
mid
-198
0s a
rea
was
in a
gric
ultu
re w
ith d
istu
rbed
soi
ls, f
urro
ws,
etc
. A
sses
smen
t are
a sp
ecifi
cs a
re
prov
ided
on
the
atta
ched
UM
AM
Par
t II.
Uni
quen
ess
(con
side
ring
the
rela
tive
rarit
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
gion
al
land
scap
e.)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
one
of m
any
fragm
ente
d fo
rmer
"man
grov
e" w
etla
nds
that
stil
l rem
ain
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a. I
t lie
s co
ntig
uous
to o
ther
sm
all,
fragm
ente
d m
angr
ove
wet
land
s. I
t app
ears
to b
e re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
sig
nific
ant w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
due
to F
LL a
nd U
S-1
to th
e w
est,
and
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
to th
e ea
st.
Roa
dway
s, a
nd la
ck o
f sur
face
wat
er c
onne
ctio
ns h
ave
mad
e th
is w
etla
nd h
ydro
logi
cally
isol
ated
.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty -
all c
urre
nt w
etla
nds
prev
ious
ly
dist
urbe
d by
agr
icul
ture
and
dra
inag
e di
tche
s. L
ies
in a
hea
vily
urb
aniz
ed
area
.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-1
7a
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
t y
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
3
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.26
7
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.26
7w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Ext
rem
ely
limite
d su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Ext
ensi
ve
inva
sive
pes
t pla
nt c
over
(B. p
eppe
r) to
the
east
. Im
med
iate
ly fl
anke
d by
US
-1 to
the
wes
t and
the
FLL
inte
rcha
nge
to th
e no
rth; f
ill p
ad a
nd s
truct
ure
to th
e ea
st fu
rther
isol
ates
this
AA
-- a
ll cr
eate
a s
igni
fican
t det
erre
nt fo
r the
m
ovem
ent o
f des
ireab
le w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e w
ith th
e ex
cept
ion
of a
vifa
una.
Bot
h up
stre
am a
nd d
owns
tream
hyd
rolo
gic
conn
ectiv
ity is
sub
stan
tially
lim
ited
- no
conn
ectio
n ex
ists
to ti
dally
influ
ence
d m
angr
oves
or o
ther
wet
land
s. I
ts
rela
tive
prox
imity
to W
-33
(sou
th o
f Tay
lor R
oad)
, als
o a
poor
qua
lity
wet
land
, doe
s no
t pro
vide
a fu
nctio
nal
land
scap
e su
ppor
t com
pone
nt.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
02
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
30
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
No
stan
ding
wat
er p
rese
nt a
t the
tim
e of
site
vis
it ot
her t
han
in th
e re
mna
nt d
itch
at th
e so
uth
and
with
in
depr
essi
ons
crea
ted
by d
owne
d tre
es.
No
surfa
ce w
ater
flow
s be
yond
the
limits
of A
A p
ossi
ble
-- d
rain
age
ditc
h cu
lver
ts c
olla
psed
, and
isol
ated
on
all s
ides
by
man
-mad
e up
land
s. N
o ra
fting
of d
ebris
to in
dica
te s
ome
epis
odic
flo
odin
g. N
o ev
iden
ce o
f ext
ende
d hy
drop
erio
d. P
rese
nce
of h
omel
ess
cam
p in
dica
tion
of d
rier c
ondi
tions
. Wat
er
qual
ity is
pre
sum
ed m
oder
ate
- goo
d, a
lthou
gh p
ossi
ble
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng ro
ads
may
deg
rade
wat
er in
AA
w
ith ti
me.
Fur
ther
redu
ctio
ns in
AA
hyd
rolo
gy a
ntic
ipat
ed d
ue to
sur
roun
ding
land
use
and
long
-term
hyd
rolo
gic
isol
atio
n.
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
occ
urre
d in
mod
erat
ion.
Nor
folk
pin
e an
d da
te p
alm
s pr
esen
t -- a
ssum
ed to
be
an a
rtifa
ct o
f pas
t si
lvic
ultu
re.
Und
erst
ory
fairl
y sp
arse
with
the
pres
ence
of l
eath
er fe
rn a
nd s
hiel
d fe
rn n
oted
-- b
oth
oblig
ate
wet
land
spec
ies.
Lon
g te
rm v
iabi
lity
of c
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e is
con
side
red
poor
due
to p
rese
nce
of e
xotic
pes
t pla
nts
and
disr
upte
d hy
drol
ogy.
Som
e ve
rtica
l stru
ctur
e of
fere
d fo
r roo
stin
g an
d ne
stin
g al
ong
the
edge
s of
the
AA
but
non
e ob
serv
ed.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.16
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wild
life
use
min
imal
bec
ause
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t re
gion
al w
ildlif
e co
rrid
or. M
ovem
ent b
etw
een
surr
ound
ing
parc
els
poss
ible
bu
t spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
s pr
ovid
ed.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ng d
evel
oped
with
road
s, h
ighw
ays,
exi
stin
g ai
rpor
t, ex
istin
g se
apor
t, an
d ot
her n
ew d
evel
opm
ent.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty -
all c
urre
nt w
etla
nds
prev
ious
ly
dist
urbe
d by
agr
icul
ture
and
dra
inag
e di
tche
s. L
ies
in a
hea
vily
urb
aniz
ed
area
.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Mos
t wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld
visi
t.N
ot A
pplic
able
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o di
rect
or i
ndire
ct e
vide
nce
of w
ildlif
e us
e w
as o
bser
ved.
Wad
ing
bird
s or
oth
er w
etla
nd w
ildife
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d; n
o pr
ey
base
or e
vide
nce
ther
eof w
as o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it; d
ense
can
opy
limits
wad
ing
bird
acc
ess.
Den
se c
anop
y di
min
ishe
s po
tent
ial A
A
use
for f
eedi
ng b
y w
adin
g bi
rds
and
rapt
ors;
spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
ava
ilabl
e --
racc
oons
, bla
ck ra
ts
likel
y in
habi
tant
s.
This
wet
land
are
a ha
s be
com
e hy
drol
ogic
ally
isol
ated
; con
nect
ion
to W
-25
to th
e ea
st n
o lo
nger
exi
sts.
US
-1 a
nd F
LL fl
anks
the
entir
e su
bjec
t are
a to
the
wes
t. To
the
north
is a
hea
vily
impa
cted
are
a w
ith th
e re
lativ
ely
rece
nt c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e U
S-1
inte
rcha
nge
acce
ssin
g FL
L. T
o th
e ea
st li
e N
E 7
th A
venu
e an
d W
-25.
To
the
sout
h lie
s Ta
ylor
Roa
d. T
hese
land
use
s es
sent
ially
sev
ere
any
wild
life
corr
idor
s an
d re
duce
the
prob
abili
ty th
at
this
site
will
rece
ive
mea
ning
ful w
ildlif
e us
e; s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble.
W-1
7b is
a s
ub-
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
of fo
rmer
W-1
7. I
t is
pred
omin
ated
by
dens
e B
razi
lian
pepp
er w
ith li
ttle
or n
o un
ders
tory
.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-17b
619/
612
Exo
tic W
etla
nd H
ardw
ood/
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Dire
ct Im
pact
2.81
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t rec
tang
ular
ass
essm
ent a
rea,
app
roxi
mat
ely
2.81
acr
es in
siz
e th
at is
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er, a
n ex
otic
pes
t pla
nt.
AA
will
be
com
plet
ely
impa
cted
from
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
sout
h ru
nway
. N
o si
gnifi
cant
wild
life
usag
e w
as n
oted
dur
ing
the
site
vis
it.P
ondi
ng o
r ope
n w
ater
ar
eas
(fres
h w
ater
) lim
ited
to d
itch
alon
g Ta
ylor
Roa
d. P
rior t
o th
e m
id-1
980s
are
a w
as u
sed
in a
gric
ultu
re w
ith d
istu
rbed
soi
ls, f
urro
ws,
etc
.A
sses
smen
t are
a sp
ecifi
cs a
re p
rovi
ded
on th
e at
tach
ed U
MA
M P
art I
I. U
niqu
enes
s (c
onsi
derin
g th
e re
lativ
e ra
rity
in re
latio
n to
the
regi
onal
la
ndsc
ape.
)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
one
of m
any
fragm
ente
d fo
rmer
"man
grov
e" w
etla
nds
that
stil
l rem
ain
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a. I
t lie
s co
ntig
uous
to o
ther
sm
all,
fragm
ente
d m
angr
ove/
exot
ic h
ardw
ood
wet
land
s. I
t app
ears
to b
e re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
sig
nific
ant w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
due
to F
LL a
nd U
S-1
to
the
wes
t, an
d P
ort E
verg
lade
s to
the
east
. R
oadw
ays,
and
lack
of s
urfa
ce w
ater
con
nect
ions
hav
e m
ade
this
wet
land
hyd
rolo
gica
lly is
olat
ed.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
No
stan
ding
wat
er p
rese
nt a
t the
tim
e of
site
vis
it. N
o su
rface
wat
er fl
ows
beyo
nd th
e lim
its o
f AA
pos
sibl
e --
dr
aina
ge d
itch
culv
erts
col
laps
ed, a
nd p
rese
nce
of b
erm
to th
e so
uth.
Muc
ky s
oils
are
pre
sent
-- s
ome
rafti
ng o
f de
bris
and
dam
ps s
oils
indi
cate
som
e ep
isod
ic fl
oodi
ng.
No
evid
ence
of e
xten
ded
hydr
oper
iod.
Wat
er q
ualit
y is
pr
esum
ed m
oder
ate
- goo
d, a
lthou
gh p
ossi
ble
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng ro
ads
may
deg
rade
wat
er in
AA
with
tim
e.Fu
rther
redu
ctio
ns in
AA
hyd
rolo
gy a
ntic
ipat
ed d
ue to
sur
roun
ding
land
use
and
long
-term
hyd
rolo
gic
isol
atio
n.D
itch
culv
erts
frin
ging
the
sout
h ed
ge o
f the
AA
blo
cked
or c
olla
psed
.
AA
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er w
ith li
ttle
or n
o un
ders
tory
. Lo
ng te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to h
eavy
ca
nop y
sha
ding
and
alle
lopa
thy.
Som
e ve
rtica
l stru
ctur
e of
fere
d fo
r roo
stin
g an
d ne
stin
g al
ong
the
edge
s of
the
AA
but n
one
obse
rved
.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 1
.03
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
30
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
04
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Lim
ited
supp
ort f
or m
any
wet
land
wild
life
spec
ies
prov
ided
in th
e im
med
iate
sur
roun
ding
s. E
xten
sive
inva
sive
pes
t pl
ant c
over
(B. p
eppe
r) o
ver t
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
). P
rese
nce
of m
ajor
road
sys
tem
s an
d ur
bani
zatio
n su
rrou
ndin
g th
e as
sess
men
t are
a ar
e de
terr
ents
and
gre
atly
lim
it th
e m
ovem
ent o
f des
ireab
le w
etla
nd
wild
life
with
the
exce
ptio
n of
avi
faun
a. B
oth
upst
ream
and
dow
nstre
am h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tivity
is s
ubst
antia
lly
limite
d - n
o co
nnec
tion
exis
ts to
tida
lly in
fluen
ced
man
grov
es.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.36
7
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.36
7w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-1
7b
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
4
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
area
.
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wild
life
use
min
imal
bec
ause
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t re
gion
al w
ildlif
e co
rrid
or. M
ovem
ent b
etw
een
surr
ound
ing
parc
els
poss
ible
bu
t spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
s su
rrou
ndin
g th
e ar
ea.
Ope
n w
ater
are
a pr
ovid
es p
ossi
ble
fora
ging
hab
itat
for w
adin
g bi
rds.
Lim
ited
utili
zatio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
offe
red
and
land
use
pra
ctic
es.
Reg
iona
lly, t
he s
urro
undi
ng a
reas
hav
e be
com
e in
crea
sing
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty.
Ope
n w
ater
feat
ure
of th
is A
A m
ost
sign
ifica
nt fo
r the
imm
edia
te a
rea
- all
curr
ent w
etla
nds
prev
ious
ly d
istu
rbed
by
agr
icul
ture
and
dra
inag
e di
tche
s. L
ies
in a
hea
vily
urb
aniz
ed a
rea.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Mos
t wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
(e.g
., w
adin
g bi
rds
fora
ging
) wer
e no
t ob
serv
ed a
t the
tim
e of
the
field
vis
it; b
ut p
rey
base
(for
age
fish)
obs
erve
d w
ithin
this
AA
.
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o di
rect
or i
ndire
ct e
vide
nce
of w
ildlif
e us
e w
as o
bser
ved.
Wad
ing
bird
s or
oth
er w
etla
nd w
ildife
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d; h
owev
er,
a po
tent
ial p
rey
base
(she
epsh
ead
min
now
) was
obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld v
isit;
den
se c
anop
y lim
its w
adin
g bi
rd a
cces
s at
the
perip
hery
, but
op
en w
ater
are
as m
ay o
ffer a
eria
l acc
ess
for w
etla
nd d
epen
dent
bird
s lo
okin
g fo
r for
age.
This
wet
land
are
a ha
s be
com
e hy
drol
ogic
ally
isol
ated
; con
nect
ion
to W
-25
to th
e ea
st n
o lo
nger
exi
sts.
US
-1 a
nd F
LL fl
anks
the
entir
e su
bjec
t are
a to
the
wes
t. To
the
north
is a
hea
vily
impa
cted
are
a w
ith th
e re
lativ
ely
rece
nt c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e U
S-1
inte
rcha
nge
acce
ssin
g FL
L. T
o th
e ea
st li
e N
E 7
th A
venu
e an
d W
-25.
To
the
sout
h lie
s Ta
ylor
Roa
d. T
hese
land
use
s es
sent
ially
sev
ere
any
wild
life
corr
idor
s an
d re
duce
the
prob
abili
ty th
at
this
site
will
rece
ive
mea
ning
ful w
ildlif
e us
e. W
-17c
is a
sub
-ass
essm
ent a
rea
of fo
rmer
W-1
7.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
CE
ME
X F
lorid
a C
ity Q
uarr
y A
cces
s R
oad
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-17c
619/
612
Exo
tic W
etla
nd H
ardw
ood/
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Dire
ct Im
pact
2.67
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t squ
are
asse
ssm
ent a
rea,
app
roxi
mat
ely
2.67
acr
es in
siz
e th
at is
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y an
arti
ficia
l ope
n w
ater
are
a fri
nged
by
man
grov
e.A
A w
ill b
e co
mpl
etel
y im
pact
ed fr
om c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e so
uth
runw
ay.
No
sign
ifica
nt w
ildlif
e us
age
was
not
ed d
urin
g th
e si
te v
isit.
Pon
d or
ope
n w
ater
are
as a
roun
d pr
op ro
ots
(fres
h w
ater
- duc
kwee
d) w
ith fo
rage
fish
not
ed .
Prio
r to
the
mid
-198
0s a
rea
was
use
d in
agr
icul
ture
with
dis
turb
ed
soils
, fur
row
s, e
tc.
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
spec
ifics
are
pro
vide
d on
the
atta
ched
UM
AM
Par
t II.
Uni
quen
ess
(con
side
ring
the
rela
tive
rarit
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
gion
al
land
scap
e.)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) lie
s co
ntig
uous
to o
ther
sm
all,
fragm
ente
d m
angr
ove
wet
land
s. I
t app
ears
to b
e re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
sig
nific
ant
wild
life
corr
idor
s du
e to
FLL
and
US
1 to
the
wes
t, an
d P
ort E
verg
lade
s to
the
east
. R
oadw
ays,
and
loss
of s
urfa
ce w
ater
con
nect
ions
hav
e m
ade
this
wet
land
hyd
rolo
gica
lly is
olat
ed.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Wat
er le
vels
app
ear a
rtific
ially
hig
h lik
ely
due
to p
ast l
and
use
prac
tices
- op
en p
onde
d ar
ea c
onta
inin
g fre
shw
ater
fri
nged
by
man
grov
es -
dist
urbe
d so
ils fr
inge
the
open
wat
er fe
atur
e. P
rese
nce
of d
uckw
eed
and
cat-t
ail i
ndic
ate
a fre
shw
ater
env
ironm
ent n
ot ty
pica
l of m
angr
ove
habi
tat.
No
surfa
ce w
ater
flow
s be
yond
the
limits
of A
A p
ossi
ble
--
drai
nage
ditc
h cu
lver
ts c
olla
psed
, and
pre
senc
e of
ber
m to
the
sout
h --
pre
clud
ing
the
activ
e pa
ssag
e of
fish
and
pa
ssiv
e pa
ssag
e of
pla
nkto
n. M
ucky
soi
ls a
re p
rese
nt.
Wat
er q
ualit
y is
pre
sum
ed m
oder
ate
- goo
d, a
lthou
gh
poss
ible
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng ro
ads
may
deg
rade
wat
er in
AA
with
tim
e. F
urth
er re
duct
ions
in A
A h
ydro
logy
an
ticip
ated
due
to s
urro
undi
ng la
nd u
se a
nd h
ydro
logi
c is
olat
ion.
Man
grov
e sp
ecie
s (r
ed, w
hite
, and
bla
ck) a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith o
pen
wat
er fe
atur
e. B
razi
lian
pepp
er in
trudi
ng fr
om th
e pe
riphe
ry, p
artic
ular
ly fr
om th
e w
est.
Cat
-tail
and
duck
wee
d ob
serv
ed w
ithin
the
open
wat
er a
rea
indi
cativ
e of
fre
shw
ater
eco
syst
em.
Littl
e un
ders
tory
ass
ocia
ted
with
man
grov
es.
Prim
rose
and
sal
t bus
h ob
serv
ed n
ear t
he
fring
es to
the
north
east
indi
cativ
e of
soi
l dis
turb
ance
. P
oor l
ong-
term
via
bilit
y, w
ith ti
me
the
AA
will
like
ly b
e ov
erta
ken
with
B. p
eppe
r as
it en
croa
ches
from
the
perip
hery
. W
ith ti
me
the
open
wat
er a
rea
may
be
furth
er
redu
ced
as it
is fu
rther
col
oniz
ed b
y ca
t-tai
l.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 1
.25
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
50
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
05
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Min
imal
sup
port
for m
any
wet
land
wild
life
spec
ies
prov
ided
in th
e im
med
iate
sur
roun
ding
s. E
xten
sive
inva
sive
pes
plan
t cov
er in
terg
radi
ng fr
om th
e W
est a
nd p
erip
hery
. P
rese
nce
of m
ajor
road
sys
tem
s an
d ur
bani
zatio
n su
rrou
ndin
g th
e as
sess
men
t are
a [A
A] a
re d
eter
rent
s an
d gr
eatly
lim
it th
e m
ovem
ent o
f des
ireab
le w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e w
ith th
e ex
cept
ion
of a
vifa
una.
Bot
h up
stre
am a
nd d
owns
tream
hyd
rolo
gic
conn
ectiv
ity is
sub
stan
tially
lim
ited
- no
conn
ectio
n ex
ists
to ti
dally
influ
ence
d m
angr
oves
. P
rese
nce
of m
inno
ws
with
in th
e A
A p
rovi
des
oppo
rtuni
ty fo
r fo
ragi
ng b
y bi
rds.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.46
7
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.46
7w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-1
7c
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
4
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
Fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t tria
ngul
ar a
sses
smen
t are
a, w
ith a
tota
l acr
eage
of
8.92
acr
es.
Of t
his,
0.2
0 ac
res
will
be
dire
ctly
impa
cted
by
the
cons
truct
ion
of
appr
oach
ligh
ts a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ac
cess
road
. Th
is A
A w
as s
epar
ated
from
W-2
5b to
the
sout
h du
e to
obs
erve
d di
ffere
nces
in v
eget
atio
n si
gnat
ure.
Littl
e w
ildlif
e us
age
was
not
ed w
ithin
this
AA
dur
ing
the
site
vis
it. P
rior t
o th
e m
id-1
980s
, are
a w
as u
sed
in a
gric
ultu
re w
ith d
istu
rbed
soi
ls, f
urro
ws,
dr
aina
ge d
itche
s, e
tc.
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
spec
ifics
are
pro
vide
d on
the
atta
ched
UM
AM
Par
t II.
Uni
quen
ess
(con
side
ring
the
rela
tive
rarit
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
gion
al
land
scap
e.)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) a la
rge
rela
tivel
y is
olat
ed m
angr
ove
wet
land
that
lies
con
tiguo
us to
oth
er s
imila
r man
grov
e w
etla
nds.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
regi
onal
ly is
olat
ed fr
om s
igni
fican
t wild
life
corr
idor
s du
e to
FLL
faci
litie
s an
d ro
ads
to th
e w
est,
and
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
to th
e ea
st.
It is
hyd
rolo
gica
lly
conn
ecte
d to
the
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
by
a se
ries
of c
anal
s, c
ulve
rts, a
nd d
itche
s.
W-2
5a
612
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Dire
ct Im
pact
0.20
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
le
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, u
se b
y sm
all f
orag
e fis
h w
as n
oted
. W
adin
g bi
rds
or o
ther
wet
land
wild
ife w
ere
not o
bser
ved
likel
y du
e to
den
se c
anop
y, b
ut
mig
ht u
se th
is A
A p
erio
dica
lly w
here
con
ditio
ns a
re fa
vora
ble.
Red
-win
ged
blac
k bi
rds
wer
e no
ted
sing
ing
with
in th
is A
A.
This
wet
land
are
a ha
s re
mai
ned
hydr
olog
ical
ly c
onne
cted
to d
iurn
al ti
des
due
to p
lace
men
t of a
ser
ies
of c
ulve
rts a
long
the
FPL
acce
ss ro
ad.
This
A
A is
con
side
red
slig
htly
less
func
tiona
l rel
ativ
e to
W-2
5b to
the
sout
h be
caus
e it
appe
ars
to li
e at
the
uppe
r lim
it of
tida
l exc
hang
e, a
ppea
rs to
be
mor
e di
stur
bed,
and
has
a g
reat
er p
ropo
rtion
of e
xotic
pes
t pla
nts
with
in is
inte
rior.
The
veg
etat
ive
sign
atur
e in
the
field
and
den
oted
on
the
aeria
l le
ad to
the
sepa
ratio
n of
this
AA
from
W-2
5b.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yN
ovem
ber 1
5/16
, 200
4 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wad
ing
bird
use
app
ears
mod
erat
e du
e to
den
se c
anop
y. W
hile
at u
pper
re
ache
s of
dai
ly ti
dal e
xten
t, A
A p
rovi
des
oppo
rtuni
ty fo
r mar
ine/
estu
arin
e fis
h, c
rust
acea
ns, a
nd p
lank
ton.
Lim
ited
utili
zatio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
offe
red
and
land
use
pra
ctic
es.
Reg
iona
lly, t
he s
urro
undi
ng a
reas
hav
e be
com
e in
crea
sing
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty. A
A in
terg
rade
s in
to W
-25b
to th
e so
uth
and
is c
onne
cted
to ti
dal f
low
s by
a s
erie
s of
cul
verts
runn
ing
from
a c
anal
to
the
east
- ar
ea p
revi
ousl
y di
stur
bed
by a
gric
ultu
re.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Som
e w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e fu
nctio
ns (e
.g.,
wad
ing
bird
s fo
ragi
ng) w
ere
not
obse
rved
at t
he ti
me
of th
e fie
ld v
isit;
but
pre
y ba
se (f
orag
e fis
h) o
bser
ved
with
in th
is A
A; l
ess
than
foun
d in
W-2
5b h
owev
er.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Wat
er le
vels
and
tida
l flu
shin
g de
pend
ent o
n cu
lver
ts (a
rtific
ial s
yste
m w
ith s
ome
redu
ced
flow
s, h
owev
er a
llow
s fo
the
activ
e pa
ssag
e of
fish
and
pas
sive
pas
sage
of p
lank
ton
amon
g ot
hers
). S
urfa
ce w
ater
flow
s ex
tend
bey
ond
the
limits
of A
A to
nor
th b
ut d
imin
ishe
s w
ith d
ista
nce.
Muc
ky s
oils
are
pre
sent
. R
emna
nt d
rain
age
ditc
hs a
ffect
sur
face
w
ater
she
et fl
ow.
Are
as o
f soi
l dis
turb
ance
/mou
nds
affe
ct s
urfa
ce w
ater
flow
. W
ater
qua
lity
is p
resu
med
mod
erat
e- g
ood,
alth
ough
pos
sibl
e ru
noff
from
sur
roun
ding
road
s m
ay d
egra
de w
ater
in A
A w
ith ti
me.
Man
grov
e sp
ecie
s (r
ed, w
hite
, and
bla
ck) a
nd b
utto
nwoo
d ch
arac
teriz
e A
A.
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
and
Aus
tralia
n pi
ne
intru
ding
from
the
perip
hery
, par
ticul
arly
from
the
wes
t and
pro
vide
for a
cha
nge
in th
e ve
geta
tion
sign
atur
e - m
ost
appe
ar a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith n
oted
soi
l dis
turb
ance
. Li
ttle
unde
rsto
ry a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith m
angr
oves
; are
as o
f B. p
eppe
r m
ore
brus
hy.
Oth
er n
on-n
ativ
e sp
ecie
s no
ted
at th
e w
este
rn e
xtre
me
of th
e A
A --
bow
strin
g he
mp,
dat
e pa
lms
etc.
th
at m
ay h
ave
been
the
resu
lt of
pas
t dis
posa
l. R
educ
ed lo
ng-te
rm v
iabi
lity
rela
tive
to W
-25b
, with
furth
er
colo
niza
tion
of B
. pep
per a
s th
e sa
linity
regi
me
allo
ws.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.12
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
60
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
06
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Mod
erat
e su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Reg
iona
lly,
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
isol
ated
and
hig
hly
com
partm
enta
lized
due
the
pres
ence
of F
LL, P
ort E
verg
lade
s, a
nd
sim
ilar u
rban
infra
stru
ctur
e. I
nvas
ive
pest
pla
nt c
over
inte
rgra
ding
from
the
wes
tern
per
iphe
ry a
nd w
ithin
this
AA
.Ti
dally
influ
ence
d (a
rtific
ial)
man
grov
e w
etla
nds
cont
iguo
us to
nor
th (W
-25b
) and
bey
ond
the
FPL
trans
mis
sion
co
rrid
or to
the
east
(W-N
4) a
llow
ing
for s
ome
mov
emen
t and
exc
hang
e of
aqu
atic
faun
a. B
oth
upst
ream
and
do
wns
tream
hyd
rolo
gic
conn
ectiv
ity is
pro
vide
d w
ith fl
ows/
flush
ing
less
pro
noun
ced
farth
er n
orth
in th
e A
A.
Its
loca
tion
from
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
redu
ces
the
land
scap
e su
ppor
t rel
ativ
e to
W-2
5b
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.60
0
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.60
0w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Nov
embe
r 15/
16, 2
004
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-2
5a
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
6
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t tria
ngul
ar a
sses
smen
t are
a, w
ith a
tota
l acr
eage
of
22.8
0 ac
res.
Of t
his
0.18
acr
es w
ill b
e di
rect
ly im
pact
ed b
y th
e co
nstru
ctio
n of
ap
proa
ch li
ghts
and
ass
ocia
ted
acce
ss ro
ad.
This
AA
was
sep
arat
ed fr
om W
-25a
to th
e no
rth d
ue to
obs
erve
d di
ffere
nces
in v
eget
atio
n si
gnat
ure.
Som
e w
ildlif
e us
age
(cra
bs, f
ish,
som
e bi
rds)
was
not
ed w
ithin
this
AA
dur
ing
the
site
vis
it. P
rior t
o th
e m
id-1
980s
are
a w
as u
sed
in a
gric
ultu
re w
ith
dist
urbe
d so
ils, f
urro
ws,
dra
inag
e di
tche
s, e
tc.
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
spec
ifics
are
pro
vide
d on
the
atta
ched
UM
AM
Par
t II.
Uni
quen
ess
(con
side
ring
the
rela
tive
rarit
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
gion
al
land
scap
e.)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
a la
rge
rela
tivel
y is
olat
ed m
angr
ove
wet
land
that
lies
con
tiguo
us to
oth
er s
imila
r man
grov
e w
etla
nds.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
regi
onal
ly is
olat
ed fr
om s
igni
fican
t wild
life
corr
idor
s du
e to
FLL
faci
litie
s an
d ro
ads
to th
e w
est,
and
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
to th
e ea
st.
It is
hyd
rolo
gica
lly
conn
ecte
d to
the
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
by
a se
ries
of c
anal
s, c
ulve
rts, a
nd d
itche
s.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty. A
A in
terg
rade
s in
to W
-25a
to th
e no
rth
and
is c
onne
cted
to ti
dal f
low
s by
a s
erie
s of
cul
verts
runn
ing
from
a c
anal
to
the
east
. A
rea
prev
ious
ly d
istu
rbed
by
agric
ultu
re.
612
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Dire
ct Im
pact
0.18
acr
es
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-25b
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, u
se b
y sm
all f
orag
e fis
h (e
.g.,
Fund
ulus
Cyp
rinod
on) w
ere
note
d. A
man
grov
e w
ater
sna
ke w
as o
bser
ved
with
in a
rem
nant
dr
aina
ge d
itch.
Wad
ing
bird
s or
oth
er w
etla
nd w
ildife
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d lik
ely
due
to d
ense
can
opy,
but
mig
ht u
se th
is A
A p
erio
dica
lly w
here
co
nditi
ons
are
favo
rabl
e. R
ed-w
inge
d bl
ack
bird
s w
ere
note
d si
ngin
g w
ithin
this
AA
.
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
This
wet
land
are
a ha
s re
mai
ned
hydr
olog
ical
ly c
onne
cted
to d
iurn
al ti
des
due
to p
lace
men
t of a
ser
ies
of c
ulve
rts a
long
the
FPL
acce
ss ro
ad.
This
A
A is
con
side
red
slig
htly
mor
e fu
nctio
nal r
elat
ive
to W
-25a
to th
e no
rth b
ecau
se it
app
ears
to s
ubje
ct to
a b
ette
r tid
al e
xcha
nge,
app
ears
to b
e m
ore
less
dis
turb
ed w
ithin
, and
has
a s
mal
ler
prop
ortio
n of
exo
tic p
est p
lant
s w
ithin
is in
terio
r. T
he v
eget
ativ
e si
gnat
ure
in th
e fie
ld a
nd d
enot
ed o
n th
e ae
rial l
ead
to th
e se
para
tion
of th
is A
A fr
om W
-25a
.
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yN
ovem
ber 1
5/16
, 200
4 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wad
ing
bird
use
app
ears
mod
erat
e du
e to
den
se c
anop
y. W
hile
at u
pper
re
ache
s of
dai
ly ti
dal e
xten
t, A
A p
rovi
des
oppo
rtuni
ty fo
r mar
ine/
estu
arin
e fis
h, c
rust
acea
ns, a
nd p
lank
ton
-- m
ulle
t, ki
llifis
h, fi
ddle
r cra
bs a
nd s
ome
wad
ing
bird
s ca
n be
exp
ecte
d, p
artic
ular
ly a
t its
edg
es.
Lim
ited
utili
zatio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
offe
red
and
land
use
pra
ctic
es.
Reg
iona
lly, t
he s
urro
undi
ng a
reas
hav
e be
com
e in
crea
sing
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
This
AA
exp
erie
nces
dai
ly ti
dal i
nund
atio
n an
d pr
ovid
es re
fugi
a fo
r aqu
atic
fa
una
trans
porte
d vi
a th
e cu
lver
t sys
tem
. S
ome
wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
(e
.g.,
wad
ing
bird
s fo
ragi
ng) w
ere
not o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it;
but p
rey
base
(for
age
fish,
mul
let,
crab
s) o
bser
ved
with
in th
is A
A.
Not
App
licab
le
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Wat
er le
vels
and
tida
l flu
shin
g de
pend
ent o
n cu
lver
ts (a
rtific
ial s
yste
m w
ith s
ome
redu
ced
flow
s), h
owev
er a
llow
s fo
r the
act
ive
pass
age
of fi
sh a
nd p
assi
ve p
assa
ge o
f pla
nkto
n am
ong
othe
rs. S
urfa
ce w
ater
flow
s ex
tend
s be
yond
th
e lim
its o
f AA
to n
orth
into
W-2
5b b
ut d
imin
ishe
s w
ith d
ista
nce.
Muc
ky s
oils
are
pre
sent
. R
emna
nt d
rain
age
ditc
hs a
ffect
sur
face
wat
er s
heet
flow
. Wat
er q
ualit
y is
pre
sum
ed m
oder
ate
- goo
d. W
ater
flow
s, fl
ushi
ng d
epen
den
upon
cul
vert
syst
em th
eref
ore
shee
tflow
not
uni
form
or n
atur
al, b
ut is
sco
red
slig
htly
hig
her t
han
W-2
5a d
ue to
be
tter/s
trong
er ti
dal f
lush
ing.
Man
grov
e sp
ecie
s (r
ed, w
hite
, and
bla
ck) a
nd b
utto
nwoo
d ch
arac
teriz
e A
A.
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
and
Aus
tralia
n pi
ne
intru
ding
from
the
wes
tern
per
iphe
ry, b
ut s
eem
to b
e lim
ited
by ti
dal f
lush
ing
and
salin
ity re
gim
e. L
ittle
und
erst
ory
typi
cal o
f man
grov
e co
mm
uniti
es.
Leat
her f
ern,
sea
oxe
ye d
aisy
in o
peni
ngs
at e
dges
of A
A.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.13
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
80
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
07
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Mod
erat
e su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Reg
iona
lly,
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
isol
ated
and
hig
hly
com
partm
enta
lized
due
the
pres
ence
of F
LL, P
ort E
verg
lade
s, a
nd
sim
ilar u
rban
infra
stru
ctur
e. T
idal
ly in
fluen
ced
(arti
ficia
l) m
angr
ove
wet
land
s co
ntig
uous
to n
orth
(W-2
5a) a
nd
beyo
nd th
e FP
L tra
nsm
issi
on c
orrid
or to
the
east
(W-N
4) a
llow
ing
for s
ome
mov
emen
t and
exc
hang
e of
aqu
atic
fa
una
-- m
ulle
t, ki
llifis
h, m
angr
ove
crab
s, fi
ddle
r cra
bs n
oted
. B
oth
upst
ream
and
dow
nstre
am h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tivity
is p
rovi
ded
with
flow
s/flu
shin
g le
ss p
rono
unce
d fa
rther
nor
th in
the
AA
as
evid
ence
d by
the
chan
ge in
ve
geta
tion
in W
-25b
. Its
loca
tion
from
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
slig
htly
incr
eaes
the
land
scap
e su
ppor
t rel
ativ
e to
W-
25a.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.73
3
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.73
3w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Nov
embe
r 15/
16, 2
004
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-2
5b
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
7
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wild
life
use
min
imal
bec
ause
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t re
gion
al w
ildlif
e co
rrid
or. M
ovem
ent b
etw
een
surr
ound
ing
parc
els
poss
ible
bu
t spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
s pr
ovid
ed.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ngly
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
the
prop
erty
- al
l cur
rent
wet
land
s pr
evio
usly
dis
turb
ed
by a
gric
ultu
re a
nd d
rain
age
ditc
hes.
Lie
s in
a h
eavi
ly u
rban
ized
are
a.A
ppea
rs to
rece
ive
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng p
rope
rties
.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Mos
t wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld v
isit
alth
ough
por
tions
of t
he s
ite m
ay b
e us
ed e
piso
dica
lly.
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o di
rect
or i
ndire
ct e
vide
nce
of w
ildlif
e us
e w
as o
bser
ved
othe
r tha
n a
fera
l cat
. W
adin
g bi
rds
or o
ther
wet
land
wild
ife w
ere
not
obse
rved
; no
prey
bas
e or
evi
denc
e th
ereo
f was
obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld v
isit;
den
se c
anop
y lim
its w
adin
g bi
rd/ra
ptor
acc
ess
over
the
maj
ority
of t
he A
A;s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble
-- ra
ccoo
ns, b
lack
rats
, and
suc
h ar
e lik
ely
inha
bita
nts.
Bas
ed o
n hi
stor
ic a
eria
ls it
app
ears
that
this
are
a ha
d be
en p
revi
ousl
y di
stur
bed
and
reve
rted
to B
. pep
per w
etla
nd o
ver t
ime.
Tw
o pa
ved
faci
litie
s im
med
iate
ly fl
ank
the
AA
to th
e w
est;
to th
e no
rth li
es T
aylo
r Roa
d; to
the
east
a F
LL fa
cilit
y an
d fil
l/upl
and
area
; to
the
sout
h lie
s th
e FP
L co
rrid
or
and
silv
icul
ture
. Th
e A
A a
ppea
rs to
rece
ive
runo
ff fro
m th
ese
prop
ertie
s fu
rther
ing
its w
etla
nd c
hara
cter
. Th
ese
land
use
s an
d th
e he
avy
urba
niza
tion
regi
onal
ly, e
ssen
tially
sev
er a
ny w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
and
redu
ce th
e pr
obab
ility
that
this
site
will
rece
ive
mea
ning
ful w
ildlif
e us
e; s
peci
es
limite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-33
619
Exo
tic W
etla
nd H
ardw
ood
(Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
)D
irect
Impa
ct5.
37 a
cres
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t rec
tang
ular
ass
essm
ent a
rea,
app
roxi
mat
ely
8.92
acr
es in
siz
e th
at is
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er, a
n ex
otic
pes
t pla
nt.
Of t
his,
5.
37 a
cres
will
be
dire
ctly
impa
cted
from
the
cons
truct
ion
of th
e so
uth
runw
ay.
No
sign
ifica
nt w
ildlif
e us
age
was
not
ed d
urin
g th
e si
te v
isit.
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
occ
ured
nea
rly th
roug
hout
with
som
ewha
t ope
n w
ater
are
as a
long
the
east
ern
and
sout
hern
frin
ges.
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
spec
ifics
are
pr
ovid
ed o
n th
e at
tach
ed U
MA
M P
art I
I. U
niqu
enes
s (c
onsi
derin
g th
e re
lativ
e ra
rity
in re
latio
n to
the
regi
onal
la
ndsc
ape.
)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) lie
s in
low
lyin
g ar
ea th
at h
as re
verte
d to
wet
land
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er.
It lie
s be
twee
n a
larg
e fil
l are
a to
th
e ea
st, a
nd p
arki
ng lo
ts fo
r ren
tal c
ars/
taxi
cab
s. A
por
tion
of it
app
ears
to b
e pa
rt of
a s
torm
wat
er tr
eatm
ent f
acili
ty.
It is
regi
onal
ly is
olat
ed fr
om
sign
ifica
nt w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
due
to F
LL a
nd U
S-1
to th
e w
est,
and
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
to th
e ea
st.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-3
3
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
t y
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
3
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.33
3
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.33
3w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Ext
rem
ely
limite
d su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Ext
ensi
ve
inva
sive
pes
t pla
nt c
over
(B. p
eppe
r) o
ver t
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
). P
rese
nce
of m
ajor
road
sy
stem
s an
d ur
bani
zatio
n su
rrou
ndin
g th
e A
A a
re d
eter
rent
and
gre
atly
lim
it th
e m
ovem
ent o
f des
ireab
le w
etla
nd
wild
life
with
the
exce
ptio
n of
avi
faun
a. D
owns
tream
hyd
rolo
gic
conn
ectiv
ity is
sub
stan
tially
lim
ited
- no
dow
stre
am
hydr
olog
ic c
onne
ctio
n is
app
aren
t to
surr
ound
ing
habi
tats
. U
pstre
am h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tivity
app
ears
to b
e in
flow
of
sto
rmw
ater
runo
ff.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
04
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
30
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
pre
sent
at t
he ti
me
of s
ite v
isit.
No
surfa
ce w
ater
out
flow
s be
yond
the
limits
of A
A p
ossi
ble.
Muc
ky
soils
are
pre
sent
-- s
ome
rafti
ng o
f deb
ris.
Wat
er q
ualit
y is
pre
sum
ed m
oder
ate,
alth
ough
pos
sibl
e ru
noff
from
su
rrou
ndin
g pa
vem
ent a
nd u
plan
ds m
ay d
egra
de w
ater
in A
A w
ith ti
me.
AA
hyd
rolo
gy/h
ydro
perio
d ap
pear
s ar
tific
ially
enh
ance
d du
e to
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng la
nd.
AA
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er w
ith li
ttle
or n
o un
ders
tory
ben
eath
. Lo
ng te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to
heav
y ca
nopy
sha
ding
and
alle
lopa
thy.
Som
e ve
rtica
l stru
ctur
e of
fere
d fo
r roo
stin
g an
d ne
stin
g al
ong
the
edge
s of
th
e A
A b
ut n
one
obse
rved
. A
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e m
ore
open
are
as a
t the
per
iphe
ry w
ere
leat
her f
ern,
cat
-tail,
love
vi
ne, h
empv
ine,
sal
t bus
h, b
room
sed
ge, p
urpl
e se
dge,
wed
elia
. Lo
ng te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to h
eavy
ca
nopy
sha
ding
and
alle
lopa
thy
of B
pep
per.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 1
.79
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t tria
ngul
ar a
sses
smen
t are
a, a
ppro
xim
atel
y 2.
95 a
cres
in s
ize
that
is p
redo
min
ated
by
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
, an
exot
ic p
est p
lant
. O
f thi
s,
2.83
acr
es w
ill b
e di
rect
ly im
pact
ed fr
om c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e so
uth
runw
ay.
No
sign
ifica
nt w
ildlif
e us
age
was
not
ed d
urin
g th
e si
te v
isit.
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
occ
ured
with
in w
ide
linea
r dep
ress
ions
orie
nted
N-S
thro
ugh
the
AA
; min
or s
oil r
idge
s w
ere
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
ese
feat
ures
. A
sses
smen
t are
a sp
ecifi
cs a
re p
rovi
ded
on th
e at
tach
ed U
MA
M P
art I
I. U
niqu
enes
s (c
onsi
derin
g th
e re
lativ
e ra
rity
in re
latio
n to
the
regi
onal
la
ndsc
ape.
)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) lie
s in
an
area
of f
orm
er a
gric
ultu
re th
at h
as re
verte
d to
wet
land
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er.
It lie
s be
twee
n pa
rkin
g lo
ts fo
r ren
tal c
ars/
taxi
cab
s to
the
east
; Tay
lor R
oad
to th
e no
rth; a
nd a
tree
farm
(W-N
3b) t
o th
e so
uth.
It i
s re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
si
gnifi
cant
wild
life
corr
idor
s du
e to
FLL
and
US
-1 to
the
wes
t, an
d P
ort E
verg
lade
s to
the
east
.
W-N
3a
619
Exo
tic W
etla
nd H
ardw
ood
Dire
ct Im
pact
2.83
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
le
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o di
rect
or i
ndire
ct e
vide
nce
of w
ildlif
e us
e w
as o
bser
ved.
Wad
ing
bird
s or
oth
er w
etla
nd w
ildife
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d; n
o pr
ey
base
or e
vide
nce
ther
eof w
as o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it; d
ense
can
opy
limits
wad
ing
bird
/rapt
or a
cces
s ov
er th
e m
ajor
ity o
f the
A
A;s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble
-- ra
ccoo
ns, b
lack
rats
, and
suc
h ar
e lik
ely
inha
bita
nts.
Bas
ed o
n hi
stor
ic a
eria
ls it
app
ears
that
this
are
a ha
d be
en p
revi
ousl
y cl
eare
d an
d us
ed fo
r agr
icul
ture
/silv
icul
ture
. A
long
the
north
wes
t sid
e lie
s Ta
ylor
Roa
d; to
the
east
par
king
for c
ar re
ntal
; to
the
sout
h lie
s ac
tive
silv
icul
ture
. Th
ese
land
use
s an
d th
e he
avy
urba
niza
tion
regi
onal
ly,
esse
ntia
lly s
ever
e an
y w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
and
redu
ce th
e pr
obab
ility
that
this
site
will
rece
ive
mea
ning
ful w
ildlif
e us
e; s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us
dist
urbe
d or
exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
ava
ilabl
e.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wild
life
use
min
imal
bec
ause
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t re
gion
al w
ildlif
e co
rrid
or. M
ovem
ent b
etw
een
surr
ound
ing
parc
els
poss
ible
bu
t spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
s pr
ovid
ed.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ng d
evel
oped
with
road
s, h
ighw
ays,
exi
stin
g ai
rpor
t, ex
istin
g se
apor
t, an
d ot
her n
ew d
evel
opm
ent.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty -
all c
urre
nt w
etla
nds
prev
ious
ly
dist
urbe
d by
agr
icul
ture
and
dra
inag
e di
tche
s. L
ies
in a
hea
vily
urb
aniz
ed
area
.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Mos
t wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld
visi
t.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
pre
sent
at t
he ti
me
of s
ite v
isit.
Lim
ited
surfa
ce w
ater
out
flow
s be
yond
the
limits
of A
A p
ossi
ble
via
drai
nage
ditc
hes
lead
ing
sout
h in
to tr
ee fa
rm (W
-N3b
). M
ucky
soi
ls a
re p
rese
nt --
som
e ra
fting
of d
ebris
. W
ater
qu
ality
is p
resu
med
mod
erat
e, a
lthou
gh p
ossi
ble
runo
ff fro
m T
aylo
r Roa
d an
d pa
rkin
g lo
t. A
A
hydr
olog
y/hy
drop
erio
d lik
ely
affe
cted
by
ditc
hing
to s
outh
and
line
ar d
epre
ssio
nal a
reas
with
in.
AA
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er w
ith li
ttle
or n
o un
ders
tory
ben
eath
. Lo
ng te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to
heav
y ca
nopy
sha
ding
and
alle
lopa
thy.
Som
e ve
rtica
l stru
ctur
e of
fere
d fo
r roo
stin
g an
d ne
stin
g al
ong
the
edge
s of
th
e A
A b
ut n
one
obse
rved
. Lon
g te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to h
eavy
can
opy
shad
ing
and
alle
lopa
thy
of B
. pe
pper
. W
ithou
t mai
nten
ance
of t
he tr
ee fa
rm to
the
sout
h, B
. pep
per w
ill c
ontin
ue to
exp
and
sout
hwar
d in
to W
-N
3b.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.85
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
20
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
04
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Ext
rem
ely
limite
d su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Ext
ensi
ve
inva
sive
pes
t pla
nt c
over
(B. p
eppe
r) o
ver t
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
). P
rese
nce
of m
ajor
road
sy
stem
s an
d ur
bani
zatio
n su
rrou
ndin
g th
e as
sess
men
t are
a ar
e de
terr
ents
and
gre
atly
lim
it th
e m
ovem
ent o
f de
sire
able
wet
land
wild
life.
Dow
nstre
am h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tivity
is s
ubst
antia
lly li
mite
d - W
-N3b
(tre
e fa
rm) t
o th
e so
uth
is c
onne
cted
, but
pro
vide
s lit
tle la
ndsc
ape
supp
ort.
Ups
tream
hyd
rolo
gic
conn
ectiv
ity a
ppea
rs to
be
inflo
w o
f st
orm
wat
er ru
noff
but l
imite
d.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.30
0
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.30
0w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-N
3a
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
3
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Exc
ept f
or d
rain
age
ditc
hes
with
in th
e A
A, a
quat
ic w
ildlif
e us
e m
inim
al
beca
use
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t reg
iona
l wild
life
corr
idor
. Mov
emen
t bet
wee
n su
rrou
ndin
g ar
eas
limite
d du
e to
hea
vy
urba
niza
tion
and
heav
y tra
ffic.
Wad
ing
bird
s, ra
ccoo
ns, r
ats
poss
ible
.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ng d
evel
oped
with
road
s, h
ighw
ays,
exi
stin
g ai
rpor
t, ex
istin
g se
apor
t, an
d ot
her n
ew d
evel
opm
ent.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion
seas
onal
ly a
nd d
urin
g si
gnifi
cant
rain
fall
even
ts.
Lim
ited
wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e ob
serv
ed a
t the
tim
e of
the
field
vis
it, b
ut m
ay b
e av
aila
ble
durin
g pe
riods
of i
nund
atio
n.
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o ev
iden
ce o
f wild
life
use
was
obs
erve
d; n
o pr
ey b
ase
or e
vide
nce
ther
eof w
as o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it - b
ut m
ay
be a
vaila
ble
with
in th
e di
tche
s an
d as
the
site
floo
ds; s
peci
es li
mite
d by
isol
atio
n an
d in
tens
e la
nd u
se s
urro
undi
ng th
is A
A.
Wad
ing
bird
s an
d si
mila
r wet
land
dep
ende
nt s
peci
es m
ight
be
expe
cted
as
occa
sion
al v
isito
rs a
s co
nditi
ons
war
rant
.
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Bas
ed o
n hi
stor
ic a
eria
ls, i
t app
ears
that
this
are
a ha
d be
en p
revi
ousl
y cl
eare
d fo
r agr
icul
ture
and
late
r im
pact
ed w
ith th
e sh
iftin
g of
US
-1 to
the
east
. It
cont
inue
s to
be
used
as
a tre
e fa
rm.
Are
a ap
pear
s to
be
perio
dica
lly, b
ut m
inim
ally
, mai
ntai
ned/
mow
ed --
whe
n le
ft fa
llow
ope
n ar
eas
colo
nize
with
wet
land
veg
etat
ion
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-N3b
241
Tree
Nur
sery
Dire
ct Im
pact
0.74
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
roug
hly
squa
re a
sses
smen
t are
a, a
ppro
xim
atel
y 5.
65 a
cres
tota
l in
size
that
is a
n em
erge
nt/g
ram
inoi
d w
etla
nd g
row
ing
with
in a
tree
nur
sery
. O
f th
is, 0
.74
acre
s w
ill b
e di
rect
ly im
pact
ed fr
om c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e so
uth
runw
ay.
AA
may
pro
vide
tem
pora
ry h
abita
t to
aqua
tic s
peci
es o
r for
age
to
wet
land
dep
ende
nt s
peci
es d
urin
g pe
riods
of e
xtre
me
inun
datio
n. A
A a
ppea
rs to
be
mar
gina
lly m
aint
aine
d - w
ithou
t mor
e aq
uatic
pla
nt s
peci
es
colo
nize
. U
niqu
enes
s (c
onsi
derin
g th
e re
lativ
e ra
rity
in re
latio
n to
the
regi
onal
la
ndsc
ape.
)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) lie
s ea
st o
f US
-1 b
etw
een
NE
10
Stre
et a
nd T
aylo
r Roa
d. W
hile
man
aged
as
a tre
e fa
rm, t
his
AA
it h
arbo
rs e
mer
gent
he
rbac
eous
/gra
min
oid
wet
land
spe
cies
and
is a
t tim
es in
unda
ted.
It i
s re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
sig
nific
ant w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
due
to it
s po
sitio
n ne
xt to
U
S-1
and
with
in h
eavy
urb
aniz
atio
n.
A s
erie
s of
dra
inag
e di
tche
s w
ithin
the
AA
, a B
razi
lian
pepp
er th
icke
t (W
-N
3a) r
esid
es a
t the
nor
th e
nd.
Larg
e pa
rkin
g fa
cilit
y fo
r tax
is a
nd re
ntal
car
s to
the
east
. G
ener
ally
in a
n he
avily
urb
aniz
ed a
rea.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Pre
senc
e of
sta
ndin
g w
ater
, hig
hly
depe
nden
t on
time
of v
isit/
seas
on.
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
pre
sent
in d
itche
s, b
ut
varia
ble
in o
pen
area
s of
pla
ntin
g. L
imite
d su
rface
wat
er o
utflo
ws
beyo
nd th
e lim
its o
f AA
pos
sibl
e du
ring
extre
me
rain
/floo
d co
nditi
ons.
Muc
ky s
oils
are
pre
sent
-- s
oils
sog
gy a
t tim
e of
vis
it. W
ater
qua
lity
is p
resu
med
fair
- m
oder
ate
beca
use
sub j
ect t
o flo
odin
g fro
m s
torm
wat
er d
rain
age
ditc
h ad
jace
nt to
US
-1.
Als
o po
ssib
le im
pact
s du
eto
on-
site
use
of p
estic
ides
, her
bici
des,
ferti
lizer
s.
A v
arie
ty h
erba
ceou
s w
etla
nd p
lant
s w
ere
obse
rved
gro
win
g be
twee
n th
e ro
ws
of tr
ees/
palm
s an
d in
ass
ocat
ion
with
the
drai
nage
ditc
hes.
Som
e ob
serv
ed in
clud
ed:
barn
yard
gra
ss, p
urpl
e se
dge,
cam
phor
wee
d, h
urric
ane
gras
s, ta
ssel
flow
er, w
ater
hys
sop,
cat
-tail;
Asi
atic
coi
nwor
t; fro
g-fru
it; C
yper
us s
pp.
Are
a m
aint
aine
d/m
owed
- do
es n
ot a
ppea
r to
be d
one
on ir
regu
lar b
asis
. It
is n
ot k
now
n if
herb
icid
e/pe
stic
ide/
ferti
lizer
s ar
e ap
plie
d w
ithin
AA
.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t are
as
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.30
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
50
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
04
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Lim
ited
supp
ort f
or m
any
wet
land
wild
life
spec
ies
prov
ided
in th
e im
med
iate
sur
roun
ding
s du
e to
m
aint
enan
ce/m
owin
g of
the
area
, and
sur
roun
ding
land
usa
ge. U
pstre
am c
ompo
nent
link
ed to
the
over
topp
ing
of
ditc
h an
d st
orm
wat
er ru
noff.
No
appa
rent
dow
nstre
am c
onne
ctio
n - a
rea
low
er th
an s
urro
undi
ngs
to a
llow
wat
er
mov
emen
t off-
site
. P
rovi
des
som
e ha
bita
t for
refu
ge w
ith th
e di
tche
s, s
easo
nal f
orag
e et
c. w
ithin
ass
essm
ent (
AA
)H
eavi
ly tr
avel
led
road
way
s en
circ
le th
is s
mal
l AA
. E
xotic
veg
etat
ion
in a
n ad
jace
nt w
etla
nd (B
. pep
per)
and
som
e ca
t-tai
l affe
ct s
core
.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Dire
ct Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.40
0
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.40
0w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-N
3b
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
3
Con
cept
ual W
etla
nd M
itiga
tion
Plan
D
RA
FTFo
rt L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t
ATT
AC
HM
ENT
3.3-
2
Seco
ndar
y Im
pact
UM
AM
Wet
land
Sco
re S
heet
s fo
r Alte
rnat
ive
B1c
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
n
This
rect
angu
lar a
sses
smen
t are
a is
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y w
hite
man
grov
e an
d ha
s a
tota
l acr
eage
of
2.67
acr
es.
Of t
his,
0.0
7 ac
res
may
be
may
re
ceiv
e se
cond
ary
impa
cts
as a
resu
lt of
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
appr
oach
ligh
ts a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ac
cess
road
. S
ome
wild
life
usag
e (c
rabs
, fis
h, s
ome
bird
s) is
exp
ecte
d bu
t non
e w
as n
oted
with
in th
is A
A d
urin
g th
e si
te v
isit.
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
spec
ifics
are
pro
vide
d on
the
atta
ched
UM
AM
Par
t II.
Uni
quen
ess
(con
side
ring
the
rela
tive
rarit
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
gion
al
land
scap
e.)
This
Ass
essm
ent A
rea
(AA
) is
a re
lativ
ely
smal
l re
ctan
gula
r man
grov
e w
etla
nd th
at a
buts
the
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
alo
ng it
s no
rth s
ide.
It i
s re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
sig
nific
ant w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
due
to I-
95 a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d fil
l to
the
wes
t, FL
L to
the
east
and
nor
th, a
nd c
omm
erci
aliz
atio
n to
th
e so
uth.
W-8
612
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
0.07
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
le
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, o
nly
fiddl
er c
rabs
wer
e ob
serv
ed. W
adin
g bi
rds
or o
ther
wet
land
wild
ife w
ere
not o
bser
ved
likel
y du
e to
den
se c
anop
y an
d th
e lim
ited
dura
tion/
exte
nt o
f flo
odin
g, b
ut m
ight
use
this
AA
per
iodi
cally
whe
re c
ondi
tions
are
favo
rabl
e.
Bas
ed o
n fie
ld o
bser
vatio
ns o
f flo
tsam
, it a
ppea
red
that
tida
l inu
ndat
ion
of W
-8 is
nei
ther
regu
lar o
r com
plet
e; th
e ex
trem
e so
uthe
rn li
mits
like
ly a
re
inun
date
d du
ring
extre
me
stor
m c
ondi
tions
; als
o a
berm
nea
r the
nor
thea
st c
orne
r lik
ely
furth
er li
mits
the
exte
nt o
f inu
ndat
ion.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 21
, 200
5
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wad
ing
bird
use
app
ears
lim
ited
due
to d
ense
can
opy
and
the
limite
d du
ratio
n of
floo
ding
. W
hile
at u
pper
reac
hes
of d
aily
tida
l ext
ent,
AA
pr
ovid
es te
mpo
rary
opp
ortu
nity
for m
arin
e/es
tuar
ine
fish,
cru
stac
eans
, and
pl
ankt
on, b
ut th
e si
te a
ppea
rs to
dra
in c
ompl
etel
y at
low
tide
, exc
ept a
t the
sh
ore
of th
e C
anal
. Fi
ddle
r cra
bs w
ere
note
d at
low
tide
.
Lim
ited
utili
zatio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
offe
red
and
land
use
pra
ctic
es.
Reg
iona
lly, t
he s
urro
undi
ng a
reas
hav
e be
com
e in
crea
sing
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty.
W-8
lies
adj
acen
t to
the
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
and
exp
erie
nces
som
e tid
al fl
oodi
ng o
n a
diur
nal b
asis
.
This
AA
exp
erie
nces
dai
ly ti
dal i
nund
atio
n an
d m
ay p
rovi
de li
mite
d re
fugi
a fo
r aqu
atic
faun
a te
mpo
raril
y tra
nspo
rted
onto
the
site
. S
ome
wet
land
w
ildlif
e fu
nctio
ns (e
.g.,
wad
ing
bird
s fo
ragi
ng) w
ere
not o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Bas
ed o
n fie
ld o
bser
vatio
ns o
f flo
tsam
, it a
ppea
red
that
tida
l inu
ndat
ion
of W
-8 is
nei
ther
regu
lar o
r com
plet
e; th
e ex
trem
e so
uthe
rn li
mits
like
ly a
re in
unda
ted
durin
g ex
trem
e st
orm
con
ditio
ns; n
onet
hele
ss, s
uch
inun
datio
ns a
llow
fo
r the
tem
pora
ry p
assa
ge o
f fis
h an
d pl
ankt
on a
mon
g ot
hers
. M
ucky
soi
ls a
re p
rese
nt. W
ater
qua
lity
is p
resu
med
m
oder
ate
- goo
d, a
s di
ctat
ed b
y th
e C
anal
wat
er q
ualit
y. A
real
ext
ent o
f sur
face
wat
er fl
ows,
flus
hing
dep
ende
nt
upon
sea
sona
l/wea
ther
tide
s, a
nd g
ener
ally
floo
ds th
e ex
trem
e no
rther
n po
rtion
of t
his
AA
. U
ncer
tain
whe
ther
st
orm
wat
er re
ceiv
ed fr
om h
otel
and
gar
age
at s
outh
edg
e.
Man
grov
e sp
ecie
s (p
redo
min
antly
whi
te m
angr
ove
with
red
man
grov
e at
the
Can
al s
hore
) cha
ract
eriz
e th
e A
A.
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
and
Aus
tralia
n pi
ne a
nd o
ther
exo
tics
lie in
the
upla
nd a
t the
wes
t but
see
m to
be
limite
d w
ithin
the
AA
by
tidal
flus
hing
and
sal
inity
regi
me.
Litt
le u
nder
stor
y ty
pica
l of m
angr
ove
com
mun
ities
. Whi
te m
angr
oves
ap
pear
to b
e ve
ry ta
ll an
d th
in a
s th
ough
som
ewha
t stre
ssed
- sa
linity
may
not
be
optim
al fo
r spe
cies
.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For s
econ
dary
impa
ct a
sses
smen
t ar
eas
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.04
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
70
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
06
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Mod
erat
e su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs
that
may
ent
er fr
om
the
Can
al.
Reg
iona
lly, a
sses
smen
t are
a (A
A) i
s is
olat
ed, h
ighl
y co
mpa
rtmen
taliz
ed d
ue th
e pr
esen
ce o
f FLL
, I-9
5,
and
sim
ilar h
igh
dens
ity u
rban
izat
ion.
Tid
ally
influ
ence
d by
the
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
allo
win
g fo
r som
e m
ovem
ent
and
exch
ange
of a
quat
ic fa
una
-- fi
ddle
r cra
bs n
oted
. C
onne
ctiv
ity is
lim
ited
to th
e no
rther
n ed
ge a
t the
Cut
-off
Can
al; i
sola
ted
on th
e re
mai
ning
thre
e si
des.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.56
7
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.56
7w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
21, 2
005
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-8
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
4
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yN
ovem
ber 1
5/16
, 200
4 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wad
ing
bird
use
app
ears
mod
erat
e du
e to
den
se c
anop
y. W
hile
at u
pper
re
ache
s of
dai
ly ti
dal e
xten
t, A
A p
rovi
des
oppo
rtuni
ty fo
r mar
ine/
estu
arin
e fis
h, c
rust
acea
ns, a
nd p
lank
ton.
Lim
ited
utili
zatio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
offe
red
and
land
use
pra
ctic
es.
Reg
iona
lly, t
he s
urro
undi
ng a
reas
hav
e be
com
e in
crea
sing
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Som
e w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e fu
nctio
ns (e
.g.,
wad
ing
bird
s fo
ragi
ng) w
ere
not
obse
rved
at t
he ti
me
of th
e fie
ld v
isit;
but
pre
y ba
se (f
orag
e fis
h) o
bser
ved
with
in th
is A
A; l
ess
than
foun
d in
W-2
5b h
owev
er.
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, u
se b
y sm
all f
orag
e fis
h w
as n
oted
. W
adin
g bi
rds
or o
ther
wet
land
wild
ife w
ere
not o
bser
ved
likel
y du
e to
den
se c
anop
y, b
ut
mig
ht u
se th
is A
A p
erio
dica
lly w
here
con
ditio
ns a
re fa
vora
ble.
Red
-win
ged
blac
k bi
rds
wer
e no
ted
sing
ing
with
in th
is A
A.
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
This
wet
land
are
a ha
s re
mai
ned
hydr
olog
ical
ly c
onne
cted
to d
iurn
al ti
des
due
to p
lace
men
t of a
ser
ies
of c
ulve
rts a
long
the
FPL
acce
ss ro
ad.
This
A
A is
con
side
red
slig
htly
less
func
tiona
l rel
ativ
e to
W-2
5b to
the
sout
h be
caus
e it
appe
ars
to li
e at
the
uppe
r lim
it of
tida
l exc
hang
e, a
ppea
rs to
be
mor
e di
stur
bed,
and
has
a g
reat
er p
ropo
rtion
of e
xotic
pes
t pla
nts
with
in is
inte
rior.
The
veg
etat
ive
sign
atur
e in
the
field
and
den
oted
on
the
aeria
l le
ad to
the
sepe
ratio
n of
this
AA
from
W-2
5b.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-25a
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
612
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
0.39
acr
es
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t tria
ngul
ar a
sses
smen
t are
a, w
ith a
tota
l acr
eage
of
8.92
acr
es.
Of t
his,
0.3
9 ac
res
may
rece
ive
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s fro
m c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e ap
proa
ch li
ghts
and
ass
ocia
ted
acce
ss ro
ad.
This
AA
was
sep
arat
ed fr
om W
-25b
to th
e so
uth
due
to o
bser
ved
diffe
renc
es in
veg
etat
ion
sign
atur
e. L
ittle
wild
life
usag
e w
as n
oted
with
in th
is A
A d
urin
g th
e si
te v
isit.
Prio
r to
the
mid
-198
0s, a
rea
was
use
d in
agr
icul
ture
with
dis
turb
ed
soils
, fur
row
s, d
rain
age
ditc
hes,
etc
. A
sses
smen
t are
a sp
ecifi
cs a
re p
rovi
ded
on th
e at
tach
ed U
MA
M P
art I
I. U
niqu
enes
s (c
onsi
derin
g th
e re
lativ
e ra
rity
in re
latio
n to
the
regi
onal
la
ndsc
ape.
)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
a la
rge
rela
tivel
y is
olat
ed m
angr
ove
wet
land
that
lies
con
tiguo
us to
oth
er s
imila
r man
grov
e w
etla
nds.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
regi
onal
ly is
olat
ed fr
om s
igni
fican
t wild
life
corr
idor
s du
e to
FLL
faci
litie
s an
d ro
ads
to th
e w
est,
and
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
to th
e ea
st.
It is
hyd
rolo
gica
lly
conn
ecte
d to
the
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
by
a se
ries
of c
anal
s, c
ulve
rts, a
nd d
itche
s.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty. A
A in
terg
rade
s in
to W
-25b
to th
e so
uth
and
is c
onne
cted
to ti
dal f
low
s by
a s
erie
s of
cul
verts
runn
ing
from
a c
anal
to
the
east
- ar
ea p
revi
ousl
y di
stur
bed
by a
gric
ultu
re.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Wat
er le
vels
and
tida
l flu
shin
g de
pend
ent o
n cu
lver
ts (a
rtific
ial s
yste
m w
ith s
ome
redu
ced
flow
s, h
owev
er a
llow
s fo
the
activ
e pa
ssag
e of
fish
and
pas
sive
pas
sage
of p
lank
ton
amon
g ot
hers
. Sur
face
wat
er fl
ows
exte
nds
beyo
nd th
e lim
its o
f AA
to n
orth
but
dim
inis
hes
with
dis
tanc
e. M
ucky
soi
ls a
re p
rese
nt.
Rem
nant
dra
inag
e di
tchs
affe
ct s
urfa
ce
wat
er s
heet
flow
. A
reas
of s
oil d
istu
rban
ce/m
ound
s af
fect
sur
face
wat
er fl
ow.
Wat
er q
ualit
y is
pre
sum
ed m
oder
ate
- goo
d, a
lthou
gh p
ossi
ble
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng ro
ads
may
deg
rade
wat
er in
AA
with
tim
e.
Man
grov
e sp
ecie
s (r
ed, w
hite
, and
bla
ck) a
nd b
utto
nwoo
d ch
arac
teriz
e th
is A
A.
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
and
Aus
tralia
n pi
ne in
trude
from
the
perip
hery
, par
ticul
arly
from
the
wes
t and
pro
vide
for a
cha
nge
in th
e ve
geta
tion
sign
atur
e -
mos
t app
ear a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith n
oted
soi
l dis
turb
ance
. Li
ttle
unde
rsto
ry a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith m
angr
oves
; are
as o
f B.
pepp
er m
ore
brus
hy.
Oth
er n
on-n
ativ
e sp
ecie
s no
ted
at th
e w
este
rn e
xtre
me
of th
e A
A --
bow
strin
g he
mp,
dat
e pa
lms
etc.
that
may
hav
e be
en th
e re
sult
of p
ast d
ispo
sal.
Red
uced
long
-term
via
bilit
y re
lativ
e to
W-2
5b, w
ith th
e A
A b
eing
sub
ject
to fu
rther
col
oniz
atio
n by
B. p
eppe
r as
the
salin
ity re
gim
e al
low
s.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For s
econ
dary
impa
ct a
sses
smen
t ar
eas
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.23
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
60
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
06
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Mod
erat
e su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Reg
iona
lly,
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
isol
ated
, hig
hly
com
partm
enta
lized
due
the
pres
ence
of F
LL, P
ort E
verg
lade
s, a
nd s
imila
r ur
ban
infra
stru
ctur
e. I
nvas
ive
pest
pla
nt c
over
inte
rgra
ding
from
the
wes
tern
per
iphe
ry a
nd w
ithin
this
AA
. Ti
dally
in
fluen
ced
(arti
ficia
l) m
angr
ove
wet
land
s co
ntig
uous
to s
outh
(W-2
5b) a
nd b
eyon
d th
e FP
L tra
nsm
issi
on c
orrid
or to
th
e ea
st (W
-N4)
allo
win
g fo
r som
e m
ovem
ent a
nd e
xcha
nge
of a
quat
ic fa
una.
Bot
h up
stre
am a
nd d
owns
tream
hy
drol
ogic
con
nect
ivity
is p
rovi
ded
with
flow
s/flu
shin
g le
ss p
rono
unce
d fa
rther
nor
th in
the
AA
. Its
loca
tion
from
D
ania
Cut
-off
Can
al re
duce
s th
e la
ndsc
ape
supp
ort r
elat
ive
to W
-25b
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.60
0
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.60
0w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Nov
embe
r 15/
16, 2
004
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-2
5a
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
6
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yN
ovem
ber 1
5/16
, 200
4 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wad
ing
bird
use
app
ears
mod
erat
e du
e to
den
se c
anop
y. W
hile
at u
pper
re
ache
s of
dai
ly ti
dal e
xten
t, A
A p
rovi
des
oppo
rtuni
ty fo
r mar
ine/
estu
arin
e fis
h, c
rust
acea
ns, a
nd p
lank
ton
-- m
ulle
t, ki
llifis
h, fi
ddle
r cra
bs, a
nd s
ome
wad
ing
bird
s ca
n be
exp
ecte
d, p
artic
ular
ly a
t its
edg
es.
Lim
ited
utili
zatio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
offe
red
and
land
use
pra
ctic
es.
Reg
iona
lly, t
he s
urro
undi
ng a
reas
hav
e be
com
e in
crea
sing
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
This
AA
exp
erie
nces
dai
ly ti
dal i
nund
atio
n an
d pr
ovid
es re
fugi
a fo
r aqu
atic
fa
una
trans
porte
d vi
a th
e cu
lver
t sys
tem
. S
ome
wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
(e
.g.,
wad
ing
bird
s fo
ragi
ng) w
ere
not o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it;
but p
rey
base
(for
age
fish,
mul
let,
crab
s) o
bser
ved
with
in th
is A
A.
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, u
se b
y sm
all f
orag
e fis
h (e
.g.,
Fund
ulus
Cyp
rinod
on) w
ere
note
d. A
man
grov
e w
ater
sna
ke w
as o
bser
ved
with
in a
rem
nant
dr
aina
ge d
itch.
Wad
ing
bird
s or
oth
er w
etla
nd w
ildife
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d lik
ely
due
to d
ense
can
opy,
but
mig
ht u
se th
is A
A p
erio
dica
lly w
here
co
nditi
ons
are
favo
rabl
e. R
ed-w
inge
d bl
ack
bird
s w
ere
note
d si
ngin
g w
ithin
this
AA
.
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
This
wet
land
are
a ha
s re
mai
ned
hydr
olog
ical
ly c
onne
cted
to d
iurn
al ti
des
due
to p
lace
men
t of a
ser
ies
of c
ulve
rts a
long
the
FPL
acce
ss ro
ad.
This
A
A is
con
side
red
slig
htly
mor
e fu
nctio
nal r
elat
ive
to W
-25a
to th
e no
rth b
ecau
se it
app
ears
to s
ubje
ct to
a b
ette
r tid
al e
xcha
nge,
app
ears
to b
e m
ore
less
dis
turb
ed w
ithin
, and
has
a s
mal
ler
prop
ortio
n of
exo
tic p
est p
lant
s w
ithin
is in
terio
r. T
he v
eget
ativ
e si
gnat
ure
in th
e fie
ld a
nd d
enot
ed o
n th
e ae
rial l
ead
to th
e se
para
tion
of th
is A
A fr
om W
-25a
.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
leW
-25b
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
612
Man
grov
e Fo
rest
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
0.41
acr
es
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
n
A s
omew
hat t
riang
ular
ass
essm
ent a
rea,
with
a to
tal a
crea
ge o
f 22
.80
acre
s. O
f thi
s, 0
.41
acre
s m
ay re
ceiv
e se
cond
ary
impa
cts
from
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
appr
oach
ligh
ts a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ac
cess
road
. Th
is A
A w
as s
epar
ated
from
W-2
5a to
the
north
due
to o
bser
ved
diffe
renc
es in
veg
etat
ion
sign
atur
e. S
ome
wild
life
usag
e (c
rabs
, fis
h, s
ome
bird
s) w
as n
oted
with
in th
is A
A d
urin
g th
e si
te v
isit.
Prio
r to
the
mid
-198
0s a
rea
was
use
d in
ag
ricul
ture
with
dis
turb
ed s
oils
, fur
row
s, d
rain
age
ditc
hes,
etc
. A
sses
smen
t are
a sp
ecifi
cs a
re p
rovi
ded
on th
e at
tach
ed U
MA
M P
art I
I.
Uni
quen
ess
(con
side
ring
the
rela
tive
rarit
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
gion
al
land
scap
e.)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
a la
rge
rela
tivel
y is
olat
ed m
angr
ove
wet
land
that
lies
con
tiguo
us to
oth
er s
imila
r man
grov
e w
etla
nds.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
regi
onal
ly is
olat
ed fr
om s
igni
fican
t wild
life
corr
idor
s du
e to
FLL
faci
litie
s an
d ro
ads
to th
e w
est,
and
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
to th
e ea
st.
It is
hyd
rolo
gica
lly
conn
ecte
d to
the
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
by
a se
ries
of c
anal
s, c
ulve
rts, a
nd d
itche
s.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty. A
A in
terg
rade
s in
to W
-25a
to th
e no
rth
and
is c
onne
cted
to ti
dal f
low
s by
a s
erie
s of
cul
verts
runn
ing
from
a c
anal
to
the
east
. A
rea
prev
ious
ly d
istu
rbed
by
agric
ultu
re.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Nov
embe
r 15/
16, 2
004
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-2
5b
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
t y
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
7
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.73
3
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.73
3w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Mod
erat
e su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Reg
iona
lly,
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
(AA
) is
isol
ated
and
hig
hly
com
partm
enta
lized
due
the
pres
ence
of F
LL, P
ort E
verg
lade
s, a
nd
sim
ilar u
rban
infra
stru
ctur
e. T
idal
ly in
fluen
ced
(arti
ficia
l) m
angr
ove
wet
land
s co
ntig
uous
to n
orth
(W-2
5a) a
nd
beyo
nd th
e FP
L tra
nsm
issi
on c
orrid
or to
the
east
(W-N
4) a
llow
ing
for s
ome
mov
emen
t and
exc
hang
e of
aqu
atic
fa
una
-- m
ulle
t, ki
llifis
h, m
angr
ove
crab
s, fi
ddle
r cra
bs n
oted
. B
oth
upst
ream
and
dow
nstre
am h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tivity
is p
rovi
ded
with
flow
s/flu
shin
g le
ss p
rono
unce
d fa
rther
nor
th in
the
AA
as
evid
ence
d by
the
chan
ge in
ve
geta
tion
in W
-25a
. Its
loca
tion
from
Dan
ia C
ut-o
ff C
anal
slig
htly
incr
eaes
the
land
scap
e su
ppor
t rel
ativ
e to
W25
-a.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
07
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
80
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
Wat
er le
vels
and
tida
l flu
shin
g de
pend
ent o
n cu
lver
ts (a
rtific
ial s
yste
m w
ith s
ome
redu
ced
flow
s); h
owev
er, A
A
allo
ws
for t
he a
ctiv
e pa
ssag
e of
fish
and
pas
sive
pas
sage
of p
lank
ton
amon
g ot
hers
. Sur
face
wat
er fl
ows
exte
nds
beyo
nd th
e lim
its o
f AA
to n
orth
into
W-2
5b b
ut d
imin
ishe
s w
ith d
ista
nce.
Muc
ky s
oils
are
pre
sent
. R
emna
nt
drai
nage
ditc
hs a
ffect
sur
face
wat
er s
heet
flow
. Wat
er q
ualit
y is
pre
sum
ed m
oder
ate
- goo
d. W
ater
flow
s, fl
ushi
ng
depe
nden
t upo
n cu
lver
t sys
tem
; the
refo
re, s
heet
flow
is n
ot u
nifo
rm o
r nat
ural
, but
is s
core
d sl
ight
ly h
ighe
r tha
n W
-25
a du
e to
bet
ter/s
trong
er ti
dal f
lush
ing.
Man
grov
e sp
ecie
s (r
ed, w
hite
, and
bla
ck) a
nd b
utto
nwoo
d ch
arac
teriz
e A
A.
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
and
Aus
tralia
n pi
ne
intru
de fr
om th
e w
este
rn p
erip
hery
, but
see
m to
be
limite
d by
tida
l flu
shin
g an
d sa
linity
regi
me.
Litt
le u
nder
stor
y ty
pica
l of m
angr
ove
com
mun
ities
. Le
athe
r fer
n, s
ea o
xeye
dai
sy in
ope
ning
s at
edg
es o
f AA
.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For s
econ
dary
impa
ct a
sses
smen
t ar
eas
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.30
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t rec
tang
ular
ass
essm
ent a
rea,
app
roxi
mat
ely
8.92
acr
es in
siz
e th
at is
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er, a
n ex
otic
pes
t pla
nt.
Of t
his,
0.
22 a
cres
may
rece
ive
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s fro
m c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e so
uth
runw
ay.
No
sign
ifica
nt w
ildlif
e us
age
was
not
ed d
urin
g th
e si
te v
isit.
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
occ
ured
nea
rly th
roug
hout
with
som
ewha
t ope
n w
ater
are
as a
long
the
east
ern
and
sout
hern
frin
ges.
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
spec
ifics
are
pr
ovid
ed o
n th
e at
tach
ed U
MA
M P
art I
I. U
niqu
enes
s (c
onsi
derin
g th
e re
lativ
e ra
rity
in re
latio
n to
the
regi
onal
la
ndsc
ape.
)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) lie
s in
low
lyin
g ar
ea th
at h
as re
verte
d to
wet
land
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er.
It lie
s be
twee
n a
larg
e fil
l are
a to
th
e ea
st, a
nd p
arki
ng lo
ts fo
r ren
tal c
ars/
taxi
cab
s. A
por
tion
of it
app
ears
to b
e pa
rt of
a s
torm
wat
er tr
eatm
ent f
acili
ty.
It is
regi
onal
ly is
olat
ed fr
om
sign
ifica
nt w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
due
to F
LL a
nd U
S-1
to th
e w
est,
and
Por
t Eve
rgla
des
to th
e ea
st.
W-3
3
619
Exo
tic W
etla
nd H
ardw
ood
(Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
)S
econ
dary
Impa
ct0.
22 a
cres
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
le
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o di
rect
or i
ndire
ct e
vide
nce
of w
ildlif
e us
e w
as o
bser
ved
othe
r tha
n a
fera
l cat
. W
adin
g bi
rds
or o
ther
wet
land
wild
ife w
ere
not
obse
rved
; no
prey
bas
e or
evi
denc
e th
ereo
f was
obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld v
isit;
den
se c
anop
y lim
its w
adin
g bi
rd/ra
ptor
acc
ess
over
the
maj
ority
of t
he A
A;s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble
-- ra
ccoo
ns, b
lack
rats
, and
suc
h ar
e lik
ely
inha
bita
nts.
Bas
ed o
n hi
stor
ic a
eria
ls it
app
ears
that
this
are
a ha
d be
en p
revi
ousl
y di
stur
bed
and
reve
rted
to B
. pep
per w
etla
nd o
ver t
ime.
Tw
o pa
ved
faci
litie
s im
med
iate
ly fl
ank
the
AA
to th
e w
est;
to th
e no
rth li
es T
aylo
r Roa
d; to
the
east
a F
LL fa
cilit
y an
d fil
l/upl
and
area
; to
the
sout
h lie
s th
e FP
L co
rrid
or
and
silv
icul
ture
. Th
e A
A a
ppea
rs to
rece
ive
runo
ff fro
m th
ese
prop
ertie
s fu
rther
ing
its w
etla
nd c
hara
cter
. Th
ese
land
use
s an
d th
e he
avy
urba
niza
tion
regi
onal
ly, e
ssen
tially
sev
er a
ny w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
and
redu
ce th
e pr
obab
ility
that
this
site
will
rece
ive
mea
ning
ful w
ildlif
e us
e; s
peci
es
limite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wild
life
use
min
imal
bec
ause
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t re
gion
al w
ildlif
e co
rrid
or. M
ovem
ent b
etw
een
surr
ound
ing
parc
els
poss
ible
bu
t spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
s pr
ovid
ed.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ngly
dev
elop
ed w
ith ro
ads,
hig
hway
s, e
xist
ing
airp
ort,
exis
ting
seap
ort,
and
othe
r new
dev
elop
men
t.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
the
prop
erty
- al
l cur
rent
wet
land
s pr
evio
usly
dis
turb
ed
by a
gric
ultu
re a
nd d
rain
age
ditc
hes.
Lie
s in
a h
eavi
ly u
rban
ized
are
a.A
ppea
rs to
rece
ive
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng p
rope
rties
.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Mos
t wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld v
isit
alth
ough
por
tions
of t
he s
ite m
ay b
e us
ed e
piso
dica
lly.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-3
3
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
t y
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
3
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.33
3
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.33
3w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Ext
rem
ely
limite
d su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Ext
ensi
ve
inva
sive
pes
t pla
nt c
over
(B. p
eppe
r) o
ver t
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
). P
rese
nce
of m
ajor
road
sy
stem
s an
d ur
bani
zatio
n su
rrou
ndin
g th
e A
A a
re d
eter
rent
and
gre
atly
lim
it th
e m
ovem
ent o
f des
ireab
le w
etla
nd
wild
life
with
the
exce
ptio
n of
avi
faun
a. D
owns
tream
hyd
rolo
gic
conn
ectiv
ity is
sub
stan
tially
lim
ited
- no
dow
stre
am
hydr
olog
ic c
onne
ctio
n is
app
aren
t to
surr
ound
ing
habi
tats
. U
pstre
am h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tivity
app
ears
to b
e in
flow
of
sto
rmw
ater
runo
ff.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
04
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
30
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
pre
sent
at t
he ti
me
of s
ite v
isit.
No
surfa
ce w
ater
out
flow
s be
yond
the
limits
of A
A p
ossi
ble.
Muc
ky
soils
are
pre
sent
-- s
ome
rafti
ng o
f deb
ris.
Wat
er q
ualit
y is
pre
sum
ed m
oder
ate,
alth
ough
pos
sibl
e ru
noff
from
su
rrou
ndin
g pa
vem
ent a
nd u
plan
ds m
ay d
egra
de w
ater
in A
A w
ith ti
me.
AA
hyd
rolo
gy/h
ydro
perio
d ap
pear
s ar
tific
ially
enh
ance
d du
e to
runo
ff fro
m s
urro
undi
ng la
nd.
AA
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er w
ith li
ttle
or n
o un
ders
tory
ben
eath
. Lo
ng te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to
heav
y ca
nopy
sha
ding
and
alle
lopa
thy.
Som
e ve
rtica
l stru
ctur
e of
fere
d fo
r roo
stin
g an
d ne
stin
g al
ong
the
edge
s of
th
e A
A b
ut n
one
obse
rved
. A
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e m
ore
open
are
as a
t the
per
iphe
ry w
ere
leat
her f
ern,
cat
-tail,
love
vi
ne, h
empv
ine,
sal
t bus
h, b
room
sed
ge, p
urpl
e se
dge,
wed
elia
. Lo
ng te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to h
eavy
ca
nopy
sha
ding
and
alle
lopa
thy
of B
pep
per.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For s
econ
dary
impa
ct a
sses
smen
t ar
eas
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.07
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e(s)
fina
lized
:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
som
ewha
t tria
ngul
ar a
sses
smen
t are
a, a
ppro
xim
atel
y 2.
95 a
cres
in s
ize
that
is p
redo
min
ated
by
Bra
zilia
n pe
pper
, an
exot
ic p
est p
lant
. O
f thi
s,
0.09
acr
es m
ay re
ceiv
e se
cond
ary
impa
cts
from
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
sout
h ru
nway
. N
o si
gnifi
cant
wild
life
usag
e w
as n
oted
dur
ing
the
site
vis
it.S
tand
ing
wat
er o
ccur
ed w
ithin
wid
e lin
ear d
epre
ssio
ns o
rient
ed N
-S th
roug
h th
e A
A; m
inor
soi
l rid
ges
wer
e as
soci
ated
with
thes
e fe
atur
es.
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
spec
ifics
are
pro
vide
d on
the
atta
ched
UM
AM
Par
t II.
Uni
quen
ess
(con
side
ring
the
rela
tive
rarit
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
gion
al
land
scap
e.)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) lie
s in
an
area
of f
orm
er a
gric
ultu
re th
at h
as re
verte
d to
wet
land
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er.
It lie
s be
twee
n pa
rkin
g lo
ts fo
r ren
tal c
ars/
taxi
cab
s to
the
east
; Tay
lor R
oad
to th
e no
rth; a
nd a
tree
farm
(W-N
3b) t
o th
e so
uth.
It i
s re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
si
gnifi
cant
wild
life
corr
idor
s du
e to
FLL
and
US
-1 to
the
wes
t, an
d P
ort E
verg
lade
s to
the
east
.
W-N
3a
619
Exo
tic W
etla
nd H
ardw
ood
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
0.09
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
le
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o di
rect
or i
ndire
ct e
vide
nce
of w
ildlif
e us
e w
as o
bser
ved.
Wad
ing
bird
s or
oth
er w
etla
nd w
ildife
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d; n
o pr
ey
base
or e
vide
nce
ther
eof w
as o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it; d
ense
can
opy
limits
wad
ing
bird
/rapt
or a
cces
s ov
er th
e m
ajor
ity o
f the
A
A;s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us d
istu
rbed
or e
xotic
impa
cted
eco
syst
em a
vaila
ble
-- ra
ccoo
ns, b
lack
rats
, and
suc
h ar
e lik
ely
inha
bita
nts.
Bas
ed o
n hi
stor
ic a
eria
ls it
app
ears
that
this
are
a ha
d be
en p
revi
ousl
y cl
eare
d an
d us
ed fo
r agr
icul
ture
/silv
icul
ture
. A
long
the
north
wes
t sid
e lie
s Ta
ylor
Roa
d; to
the
east
par
king
for c
ar re
ntal
; to
the
sout
h lie
s ac
tive
silv
icul
ture
. Th
ese
land
use
s an
d th
e he
avy
urba
niza
tion
regi
onal
ly,
esse
ntia
lly s
ever
e an
y w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
and
redu
ce th
e pr
obab
ility
that
this
site
will
rece
ive
mea
ning
ful w
ildlif
e us
e; s
peci
es li
mite
d by
the
vario
us
dist
urbe
d or
exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
ava
ilabl
e.
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Wild
life
use
min
imal
bec
ause
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t re
gion
al w
ildlif
e co
rrid
or. M
ovem
ent b
etw
een
surr
ound
ing
parc
els
poss
ible
bu
t spe
cies
lim
ited
by th
e va
rious
dis
turb
ed o
r exo
tic im
pact
ed e
cosy
stem
s pr
ovid
ed.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ng d
evel
oped
with
road
s, h
ighw
ays,
exi
stin
g ai
rpor
t, ex
istin
g se
apor
t, an
d ot
her n
ew d
evel
opm
ent.
No
biol
ogic
ally
sig
nific
ant u
plan
d fe
atur
es o
r sig
nific
ant w
etla
nd a
reas
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
near
by th
e pr
oper
ty -
all c
urre
nt w
etla
nds
prev
ious
ly
dist
urbe
d by
agr
icul
ture
and
dra
inag
e di
tche
s. L
ies
in a
hea
vily
urb
aniz
ed
area
.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion.
Mos
t wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e no
t obs
erve
d at
the
time
of th
e fie
ld
visi
t.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
pre
sent
at t
he ti
me
of s
ite v
isit.
Lim
ited
surfa
ce w
ater
out
flow
s be
yond
the
limits
of A
A p
ossi
ble
via
drai
nage
ditc
hes
lead
ing
sout
h in
to tr
ee fa
rm (W
-N3b
). M
ucky
soi
ls a
re p
rese
nt --
som
e ra
fting
of d
ebris
. W
ater
qu
ality
is p
resu
med
mod
erat
e, a
lthou
gh p
ossi
ble
runo
ff fro
m T
aylo
r Roa
d an
d pa
rkin
g lo
t. A
A
hydr
olog
y/hy
drop
erio
d lik
ely
affe
cted
by
ditc
hing
to s
outh
and
line
ar d
epre
ssio
nal a
reas
with
in.
AA
pre
dom
inat
ed b
y B
razi
lian
pepp
er w
ith li
ttle
or n
o un
ders
tory
ben
eath
. Lo
ng te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to
heav
y ca
nopy
sha
ding
and
alle
lopa
thy.
Som
e ve
rtica
l stru
ctur
e of
fere
d fo
r roo
stin
g an
d ne
stin
g al
ong
the
edge
s of
th
e A
A b
ut n
one
obse
rved
. Lon
g te
rm v
iabi
lity
of s
ite is
poo
r due
to h
eavy
can
opy
shad
ing
and
alle
lopa
thy
of B
. pe
pper
. W
ithou
t mai
nten
ance
of t
he tr
ee fa
rm to
the
sout
h, B
. pep
per w
ill c
ontin
ue to
exp
and
sout
hwar
d in
to W
-N
3b.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For s
econ
dary
impa
ct a
sses
smen
t ar
eas
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.03
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
20
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
04
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Ext
rem
ely
limite
d su
ppor
t for
man
y w
etla
nd w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
imm
edia
te s
urro
undi
ngs.
Ext
ensi
ve
inva
sive
pes
t pla
nt c
over
(B. p
eppe
r) o
ver t
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
). P
rese
nce
of m
ajor
road
sy
stem
s an
d ur
bani
zatio
n su
rrou
ndin
g th
e as
sess
men
t are
a ar
e de
terr
ents
and
gre
atly
lim
it th
e m
ovem
ent o
f de
sire
able
wet
land
wild
life.
Dow
nstre
am h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tivity
is s
ubst
antia
lly li
mite
d - W
-N3b
(tre
e fa
rm) t
o th
e so
uth
is c
onne
cted
, but
pro
vide
s lit
tle la
ndsc
ape
supp
ort.
Ups
tream
hyd
rolo
gic
conn
ectiv
ity a
ppea
rs to
be
inflo
w o
f st
orm
wat
er ru
noff
but l
imite
d.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.30
0
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.30
0w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-N
3a
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
3
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
n S
ite?
Impa
ct A
rea
Siz
e
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Ass
essm
ent c
ondu
cted
by:
Ass
essm
ent d
ate(
s):
Geo
grap
hic
rela
tions
hip
to a
nd h
ydro
logi
c co
nnec
tion
with
wet
land
s, o
ther
sur
face
wat
er, u
plan
ds
Func
tions
Miti
gatio
n fo
r pre
viou
s pe
rmit/
othe
r his
toric
use
Sig
nific
ant n
earb
y fe
atur
es
Ass
essm
ent a
rea
desc
riptio
nA
roug
hly
squa
re a
sses
smen
t are
a, a
ppro
xim
atel
y 5.
65 a
cres
tota
l in
size
that
is a
n em
erge
nt/g
ram
inoi
d w
etla
nd g
row
ing
with
in a
tree
nur
sery
. O
f th
is, 0
.24
acre
s m
ay re
ceiv
e se
cond
ary
impa
cts
from
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
sout
h ru
nway
. A
A m
ay p
rovi
de te
mpo
rary
hab
itat t
o aq
uatic
spe
cies
or
fora
ge to
wet
land
dep
ende
nt s
peci
es d
urin
g pe
riods
of e
xtre
me
inun
datio
n. A
A a
ppea
rs to
be
mar
gina
lly m
aint
aine
d - w
ithou
t mor
e aq
uatic
pla
nt
spec
ies
colo
nize
. U
niqu
enes
s (c
onsi
derin
g th
e re
lativ
e ra
rity
in re
latio
n to
the
regi
onal
la
ndsc
ape.
)
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
(AA
) lie
s ea
st o
f US
-1 b
etw
een
NE
10
Stre
et a
nd T
aylo
r Roa
d. W
hile
man
aged
as
a tre
e fa
rm, t
his
AA
it h
arbo
rs e
mer
gent
he
rbac
eous
/gra
min
oid
wet
land
spe
cies
and
is a
t tim
es in
unda
ted.
It i
s re
gion
ally
isol
ated
from
sig
nific
ant w
ildlif
e co
rrid
ors
due
to it
s po
sitio
n ne
xt to
U
S-1
and
with
in h
eavy
urb
aniz
atio
n.
W-N
3b
241
Tree
Nur
sery
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
0.24
acr
es
Furth
er c
lass
ifica
tion
(opt
iona
l)
(See
Sec
tion
62-3
45.4
00, F
.A.C
.)
Not
App
licab
leC
lass
III
Non
e
Spe
cial
Cla
ssifi
catio
n (i.
e.O
FW, A
P, o
ther
loca
l/sta
te/fe
dera
l des
igna
tion
of im
porta
nce)
Affe
cted
Wat
erbo
dy (C
lass
)B
asin
/Wat
ersh
ed N
ame/
Num
ber
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
FLU
CC
s co
de
Not
App
licab
le
Bas
ed o
n hi
stor
ic a
eria
ls, i
t app
ears
that
this
are
a ha
d be
en p
revi
ousl
y cl
eare
d fo
r agr
icul
ture
and
late
r im
pact
ed w
ith th
e sh
iftin
g of
US
-1 to
the
east
. It
cont
inue
s to
be
used
as
a tre
e fa
rm.
Are
a ap
pear
s to
be
perio
dica
lly, b
ut m
inim
ally
, mai
ntai
ned/
mow
ed --
whe
n le
ft fa
llow
ope
n ar
eas
colo
nize
with
wet
land
veg
etat
ion
Obs
erve
d E
vide
nce
of W
ildlif
e U
tiliz
atio
n (L
ist s
peci
es d
irect
ly o
bser
ved,
or o
ther
sig
ns s
uch
as tr
acks
, dro
ppin
gs, c
asin
gs, n
ests
, etc
.):
Ant
icip
ated
Util
izat
ion
by L
iste
d S
peci
es (L
ist s
peci
es, t
heir
lega
l cl
assi
ficat
ion
(E, T
, SS
C),
type
of u
se, a
nd in
tens
ity o
f use
of t
he
asse
ssm
ent a
rea)
Ant
icip
ated
Wild
life
Util
izat
ion
Bas
ed o
n Li
tera
ture
Rev
iew
(Lis
t of s
peci
es
that
are
repr
esen
tativ
e of
the
asse
ssm
ent a
rea
and
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to
be fo
und
)
A s
erie
s of
dra
inag
e di
tche
s w
ithin
the
AA
, a B
razi
lian
pepp
er th
icke
t (W
-N
3a) r
esid
es a
t the
nor
th e
nd.
Larg
e pa
rkin
g fa
cilit
y fo
r tax
is a
nd re
ntal
car
s to
the
east
. G
ener
ally
in a
n he
avily
urb
aniz
ed a
rea.
This
ass
essm
ent a
rea
func
tions
prim
arily
for w
ater
sto
rage
/flow
atte
nuat
ion
seas
onal
ly a
nd d
urin
g si
gnifi
cant
rain
fall
even
ts.
Lim
ited
wet
land
wild
life
func
tions
wer
e ob
serv
ed a
t the
tim
e of
the
field
vis
it, b
ut m
ay b
e av
aila
ble
durin
g pe
riods
of i
nund
atio
n.
Not
App
licab
le
Dur
ing
the
site
vis
it, n
o ev
iden
ce o
f wild
life
use
was
obs
erve
d; n
o pr
ey b
ase
or e
vide
nce
ther
eof w
as o
bser
ved
at th
e tim
e of
the
field
vis
it - b
ut m
ay
be a
vaila
ble
with
in th
e di
tche
s an
d as
the
site
floo
ds; s
peci
es li
mite
d by
isol
atio
n an
d in
tens
e la
nd u
se s
urro
undi
ng th
is A
A.
Wad
ing
bird
s an
d si
mila
r wet
land
dep
ende
nt s
peci
es m
ight
be
expe
cted
as
occa
sion
al v
isito
rs a
s co
nditi
ons
war
rant
.
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
PA
RT
I – Q
ualit
ativ
e D
escr
iptio
n
Form
62-
345.
900(
1), F
.A.C
. [
effe
ctiv
e da
te ]
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
yJa
nuar
y 20
, 200
5 &
May
19,
200
6
Not
App
licab
le
Add
ition
al re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s:
Exc
ept f
or d
rain
age
ditc
hes
with
in th
e A
A, a
quat
ic w
ildlif
e us
e m
inim
al
beca
use
site
is is
olat
ed/s
ever
ed fr
om a
ny s
igni
fican
t reg
iona
l wild
life
corr
idor
. Mov
emen
t bet
wee
n su
rrou
ndin
g ar
eas
limite
d du
e to
hea
vy
urba
niza
tion
and
heav
y tra
ffic.
Wad
ing
bird
s, ra
ccoo
ns, r
ats
poss
ible
.
No
antic
ipat
ed u
tiliz
atio
n by
Lis
ted
Spe
cies
due
to th
e ty
pe o
f hab
itats
of
fere
d an
d la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
. R
egio
nally
, the
sur
roun
ding
are
as
have
bec
ome
incr
easi
ng d
evel
oped
with
road
s, h
ighw
ays,
exi
stin
g ai
rpor
t, ex
istin
g se
apor
t, an
d ot
her n
ew d
evel
opm
ent.
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
w/o
pre
s or
curr
ent
curr
ent
or w
/o p
res
Fina
lized
by:
Dat
e fin
aliz
ed:
Mic
hael
J. T
ust
Janu
ary
15, 2
008
Pre
senc
e of
sta
ndin
g w
ater
, hig
hly
depe
nden
t on
time
of v
isit/
seas
on.
Sta
ndin
g w
ater
pre
sent
in d
itche
s, b
ut
varia
ble
in o
pen
area
s of
pla
ntin
g. L
imite
d su
rface
wat
er o
utflo
ws
beyo
nd th
e lim
its o
f AA
pos
sibl
e du
ring
extre
me
rain
/floo
d co
nditi
ons.
Muc
ky s
oils
are
pre
sent
-- s
oils
sog
gy a
t tim
e of
vis
it. W
ater
qua
lity
is p
resu
med
fair
- m
oder
ate
beca
use
sub j
ect t
o flo
odin
g fro
m s
torm
wat
er d
rain
age
ditc
h ad
jace
nt to
US
-1.
Als
o po
ssib
le im
pact
s du
eto
on-
site
use
of p
estic
ides
, her
bici
des,
ferti
lizer
s.
A v
arie
ty h
erba
ceou
s w
etla
nd p
lant
s w
ere
obse
rved
gro
win
g be
twee
n th
e ro
ws
of tr
ees/
palm
s an
d in
ass
ocat
ion
with
the
drai
nage
ditc
hes.
Som
e ob
serv
ed in
clud
ed:
barn
yard
gra
ss, p
urpl
e se
dge,
cam
phor
wee
d, h
urric
ane
gras
s, ta
ssel
flow
er, w
ater
hys
sop,
cat
-tail;
Asi
atic
coi
nwor
t; fro
g-fru
it; C
yper
us s
pp.
Are
a m
aint
aine
d/m
owed
- do
es n
ot a
ppea
r to
be d
one
on ir
regu
lar b
asis
. It
is n
ot k
now
n if
herb
icid
e/pe
stic
ide/
ferti
lizer
s ar
e ap
plie
d w
ithin
AA
.
Tim
e la
g (t-
fact
or) =
NA
Ris
k fa
ctor
= N
A
If m
itiga
tion
For s
econ
dary
impa
ct a
sses
smen
t ar
eas
FL =
del
ta x
impa
ct a
cres
= 0
.10
For m
itiga
tion
asse
ssm
ent a
reas
RFG
= d
elta
/(t-fa
ctor
x ri
sk) =
NA
If pr
eser
vatio
n as
miti
gatio
n,
50
Sco
re =
sum
of a
bove
sco
res/
30
(if
upla
nds,
div
ide
by 2
0)
with0 with
.500
(6)(
c)C
omm
unity
stru
ctur
e
04
.500
(6)(
b)W
ater
Env
ironm
ent
(n/a
for u
plan
ds)
1. V
e get
atio
n an
d/or
2. B
enth
ic C
omm
unity
.500
(6)(
a) L
ocat
ion
and
Land
scap
e S
uppo
rt with
Lim
ited
supp
ort f
or m
any
wet
land
wild
life
spec
ies
prov
ided
in th
e im
med
iate
sur
roun
ding
s du
e to
m
aint
enan
ce/m
owin
g of
the
area
, and
sur
roun
ding
land
usa
ge. U
pstre
am c
ompo
nent
link
ed to
the
over
topp
ing
of
ditc
h an
d st
orm
wat
er ru
noff.
No
appa
rent
dow
nstre
am c
onne
ctio
n - a
rea
low
er th
an s
urro
undi
ngs
to a
llow
wat
er
mov
emen
t off-
site
. P
rovi
des
som
e ha
bita
t for
refu
ge w
ith th
e di
tche
s, s
easo
nal f
orag
e et
c. w
ithin
ass
essm
ent (
AA
)H
eavi
ly tr
avel
led
road
way
s en
circ
le th
is s
mal
l AA
. E
xotic
veg
etat
ion
in a
n ad
jace
nt w
etla
nd (B
. pep
per)
and
som
e ca
t-tai
l affe
ct s
core
.
Con
ditio
n is
insu
ffici
ent t
o pr
ovid
e w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce
wat
er fu
nctio
ns
Con
ditio
n is
opt
imal
and
fu
lly s
uppo
rts
wet
land
/sur
face
wat
er
func
tions
Con
ditio
n is
less
than
op
timal
, but
suf
ficie
nt to
m
aint
ain
mos
t w
etla
nd/s
urfa
cew
ater
func
tions
(See
Sec
tions
62-
345.
500
and
.600
, F.A
.C.)
Ft L
aude
rdal
e-H
olly
woo
d In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (FL
L)
Sec
onda
ry Im
pact
Ste
phen
W. C
arne
y
Site
/Pro
ject
Nam
eA
pplic
atio
n N
umbe
rA
sses
smen
t Are
a N
ame
or N
umbe
r
Impa
ct o
r Miti
gatio
nA
sses
smen
t dat
e:A
sses
smen
t con
duct
ed b
y:
PAR
T II
– Q
uant
ifica
tion
of A
sses
smen
t Are
a (im
pact
or m
itiga
tion)
Form
62-
345.
900(
2), F
.A.C
. [e
ffect
ive
date
]
0.40
0
Pre
serv
atio
n ad
just
men
t fac
tor =
NA
Adj
uste
d m
itiga
tion
delta
= N
A
Del
ta =
[with
-cur
rent
]
0.40
0w
ith
Min
imal
leve
l of s
uppo
rt of
w
etla
nd/s
urfa
ce w
ater
fu
nctio
ns
Opt
imal
(10)
0
Not
App
licab
le
Not
Pre
sent
(0)
Janu
ary
20, 2
005
& M
ay 1
9, 2
006
Mod
erat
e(7)
Min
imal
(4)
W-N
3b
Sco
ring
Gui
danc
eTh
e sc
orin
g of
eac
h in
dica
tor i
s ba
sed
on w
hat
wou
ld b
e su
itabl
e fo
r the
ty
pe o
f wet
land
or s
urfa
ce
wat
er a
sses
sed
3
95
595Snyder Park
84
31
9R
13
9L
27R
27L
1
1
McIntosh R
d
Griffin Rd
Dania Cut Off Canal
NE
7th
Ave
Old Griffin Rd
Ang
lers
Ave
SW 9
th A
ve
Eller Drive
SW 53 Ct
SE 1
4th
Ave
SW 1
5th
Ave
SW 39th St
SW 4
th A
ve
SW 1
2th
Ave
S Andrew
s Ave
Bry
an R
d
Terminal Dr
NE
3rd
Ave
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood
InternationalAirport
Environmental Impact StatementFort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport
LegendDetailed Study Area
Existing Surface Waters
Existing Wetlands
Impacted AreasAccess Road Impacts
Permanent Airfield Impacts
Temporary Construction Impacts
Limits of DisturbanceRelocated Radar
Disturbed Area Access Road
Disturbed Area Airfield
Disturbed Area Facility Relocations
Disturbed Stormwater Collection System
Disturbed Area Temporary Construction
Disturbed Area Terminal
0 2,0001,000Feet
1/25/08Filename: ENV_FLL\GIS\GIS\SWC\TCG_Alternatives\B1 Revision1\B1bcWetlandsImpacts_Figures2-1-1&3-1-1.mxd
Attachment:
2.1.1-1Impacts to Wetlands from B1b/c Alternative
"Pa
ce.W
ilber
"
<Pa
ce.W
ilber
@noaa
.gov>
To
Virgin
ia L
ane/
ASO
/FAA@
FAA
11/2
5/2
008 0
9:5
9
c
c
AM
Jo
cely
n.K
araz
sia@
noaa
.gov,
Robin
Wie
ble
r <
Robin
.Wie
ble
r@noaa
.gov>
S
ubje
ct
Re:
Fw
d:
Exc
erpt
from
FLL
Rec
ord
of
Dec
isio
n -
NM
FS t
ext
Hel
lo V
irgin
ia.
By
incl
udin
g t
he
hig
hlig
hte
d t
ext
in t
he
atta
ched
exc
erpt
from
the
Rec
ord
of D
ecis
ion (
e.g.,
"th
e FA
A w
ill e
nsu
re t
hat
the
Airport
Sponso
r, in
consu
ltat
ion w
ith N
MFS
Hab
itat
Conse
rvation D
ivis
ion [
HCD
], w
ill d
evel
op a
m
itig
ation a
nd m
onitoring p
lan a
s part
of
the
Sec
tion 4
04 p
erm
it p
roce
ss")
, w
e ca
n c
lose
the
EFH
consu
ltation for
the
purp
ose
of
the
pro
ject
's E
IS.
We
rem
ain p
repar
ed t
o w
ork
dili
gen
tly
with t
he
loca
l sp
onso
r an
d F
AA t
o
com
ple
te t
he
mitig
atio
n p
lan t
o a
void
del
ays
during t
he
404 p
erm
itting
pro
cess
and d
uring t
he
continuation o
f th
e EFH
consu
ltat
ion t
hat
the
404
per
mitting p
roce
ss w
ill t
rigger
.
Than
ks,
Pace
Wilb
er
S
ubje
ct:
Exc
erpt
from
FLL
Rec
ord
of
Dec
isio
n -
NM
FS t
ext
F
rom
: Vir
gin
ia.L
ane@
faa.
gov
D
ate:
Fri,
21 N
ov
2008 1
3:5
9:2
7 -
0500
T
o:
Joce
lyn.K
araz
sia@
noaa
.gov
T
o:
Joce
lyn.K
araz
sia@
noaa
.gov
C
C:
jack
ie.s
wea
tt-e
ssic
k@fa
a.gov
Jo
cely
n,
bas
ed o
n o
ur
tele
phone
dis
cuss
ion t
oday,
I h
ave
att
ached
a
w
ord
docu
men
t w
ith e
xcer
pts
fro
m t
he
FLL
RO
D w
ith t
he
refe
rence
d N
MFS
se
ctio
ns
per
your
email.
Pl
ease
hav
e yo
ur
super
viso
r,M
r. W
ilber
,
se
nd u
s an
em
ail co
nfirm
ing t
hat
FAA h
as c
om
ple
ted t
he
EFH
pro
cess
on
M
onday
Nove
mber
24.
Thanks
.
Virgin
ia L
ane,
A.I
.C.P
.
Fe
der
al Avi
atio
n A
dm
inis
trat
ion
O
rlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Off
ice
5950 H
azel
tine
Nat
ional
Drive
O
rlan
do,
FL
32822
Tel
: 407/8
12/6
331 E
xt.
129
Fa
x: 4
07/8
12/6
978
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
Pace
Wilb
er,
Ph.D
. Atlan
tic
Bra
nch
Chie
f, C
har
lest
on (
F/SER47)
South
east
Reg
ional
Off
ice,
NO
AA F
isher
ies
PO B
ox
12559
Char
lest
on,
SC 2
9422-2
559
843-9
53-7
200
FAX 8
43-9
53-7
205
pac
e.w
ilber
@noaa
.gov
htt
p:/
/ser
o.n
mfs
.noaa.
gov/
dhc/
hab
itat
.htm
(See
att
ach
ed file
: Exc
erpt
from
FLL
Rec
ord
of
Dec
isio
n -
NM
FS t
ext.
doc)
Exce
rpt
fro
m
FLL
Reco
rd
of
Deci
sio
n-
SE
CTIO
N
4
SU
MM
AR
Y
OF
MIT
IGA
TIO
N
MEA
SU
RE
S…
……
……
……
……
……
…..
NM
FS
re
com
men
ded
te
xt
in b
lue.
Bro
war
d
County
, as
th
e
applic
ant,
w
ill
apply
fo
r al
l re
quired
per
mits.
Bro
war
d C
ounty
has
obta
ined
per
mits
from
the
USACE a
nd t
he
SFW
MD
that
al
low
fo
r hab
itat
re
stora
tion
and
enhan
cem
ent
within
W
est
Lake
Par
k.1
Bro
war
d
County
has
pro
vided
a
lett
er
indic
atin
g
thei
r co
mm
itm
ent
to
imple
ment
the
wet
land
mitig
atio
n
that
w
ould
be
required
for
pro
ject
im
pac
ts.2
A D
epar
tmen
t of
the
Arm
y per
mit u
nder
Sec
tion 4
04 o
f th
e C
lean
W
ater
Act
will
be
required
for
this
pro
ject
and a
modific
atio
n t
o t
he
SFW
MD
Envi
ronm
enta
l Res
ourc
e Per
mit
(ERP)
No.
06-0
0339-S
fo
r im
pac
ts
to
juri
sdic
tional
w
etla
nds.
In
resp
onse
to
th
e N
MFS
Conse
rvat
ion
Rec
om
mendat
ions3
, th
e FA
A
will
ensu
re
that
th
e Airport
Sponso
r,
in
consu
ltat
ion w
ith N
MFS
Hab
itat
Conse
rvat
ion D
ivis
ion (
HCD
), w
ill d
evelo
p a
m
itig
ation a
nd m
onitori
ng p
lan a
s par
t of
the S
ect
ion 4
04 p
erm
it p
roce
ss.
Exce
rpt
fro
m
FLL
Reco
rd
of
Deci
sio
n-
SEC
TIO
N
6
FIN
DIN
GS
A
ND
D
ETER
MIN
ATIO
NS
……
……
……
……
……
……
..N
MFS
reco
mm
en
ded
text
in
blu
e.
The
FAA p
rovi
ded
an E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
(EFH
) as
sess
ment
in a
ccord
ance
w
ith 5
0 C
FR S
ect
ion 6
00.9
20(e
) fo
r an
EFH
ass
essm
ent
in t
he D
raft
EIS
. I
n
resp
onse
to
th
eir
com
men
ts
on
the
Dra
ft
EIS
, th
e N
MFS
pro
vided
Conse
rvat
ion R
eco
mm
endat
ions
in a
ccord
ance
with S
ection 3
05(b
)(4)(
A)
of
the
Mag
nuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
, and
als
o
reques
ted
additio
nal
info
rmat
ion
in
ord
er
to
fully
ev
aluat
e th
e pro
pose
d
pro
ject
.4
The
FAA
pro
vided
th
e
reques
ted a
dditio
nal
info
rmat
ion a
nd t
he
FAA's
res
ponse
to t
he
NM
FS E
FH
Conse
rvat
ion Rec
om
men
dat
ions.
5 The
FAA has
fully
co
nsi
der
ed th
e EFH
Conse
rvat
ion
Rec
om
men
dat
ions
in
acco
rdan
ce
with
the
requirem
ents
of
Sec
tion 305(b
)(4)(
B)
of
the
Mag
nuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
. Consi
stent
with th
e
NM
FS E
FH C
onse
rvat
ion R
ecom
men
dat
ions,
a C
once
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n
Pla
n t
o c
om
pen
sate
for
unav
oid
able
im
pac
ts t
o w
etla
nds
and E
FH is
pro
vided
in
the
Final
EIS
, Appen
dix
M,
Bio
logic
al R
esourc
es.
The
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd
Mitig
atio
n P
lan r
efe
rence
s a
monitori
ng p
lan f
or
the
ecolo
gic
al s
ucc
ess
of
the
off
-site
com
pen
sato
ry
mitig
atio
n
as
des
crib
ed
in
Sec
tion
Five
of
the
1
United
Sta
tes
Arm
y Corp
s of
Engin
eer
s (U
SAC
E)
Perm
it N
um
ber
SAJ-
2002-0
0072 an
d
South
Flo
rida
Wat
er M
anag
em
ent
Dis
tric
t (S
FWM
D)
Per
mit N
um
ber
06 0
4016 P
. 2
Lett
er f
rom
Mar
c G
am
brill,
Bro
war
d C
ounty
Avi
atio
n D
epar
tment,
to V
irgin
ia L
ane,
FAA
Orlan
do A
irport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e.
Dat
ed
Dece
mber
4,
2007
3
Lett
er fr
om
Pau
l W
elle
r fo
r M
iles
M.
Cro
om
, Ass
ista
nt
Regio
nal
Adm
inis
trato
r, H
abitat
Conse
rvat
ion D
ivis
ion,
Nat
ional
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s Ser
vice
, to
Vir
gin
ia L
ane,
FAA O
rlan
do
Air
port
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e.
Dat
ed:
May
17,
2007
4
Lett
er fr
om
Pau
l W
elle
r fo
r M
iles
M.
Cro
om
, Ass
ista
nt
Regio
nal
Adm
inis
trato
r, H
abitat
Conse
rvat
ion D
ivis
ion,
Nat
ional
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s Ser
vice
, to
Vir
gin
ia L
ane,
FAA O
rlan
do
Air
port
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e,
RE:
F/S
ER4:J
K/p
w.
Dat
ed:
May
17,
2007
5
Lett
er
from
Vir
gin
ia
Lane,
FA
A
Orlan
do
Airport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e,
to
Joce
lyn
Kar
azsi
a,
Nat
ional
M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
, w
ith
encl
osu
re
Dir
ect,
Seco
ndar
y,
and
Cum
ula
tive
Eff
ects
on E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
. D
ated
: S
epte
mber
29,
2008.
Form
atte
d: N
ot H
ighl
ight
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan.
Furt
her
refinem
ent
of
the C
once
ptu
al
Wet
land M
itig
atio
n Pla
n an
d th
e m
onitoring pla
n ar
e to
be
addre
ssed
by
Bro
war
d C
ounty
and t
he U
SAC
E d
uri
ng t
he
Sec
tion 4
04 p
erm
itting p
roce
ss.
NM
FS
pro
vided
co
mm
ents
on
the
Final
EIS
re
gar
din
g
the
additio
nal
info
rmat
ion
refe
rence
d
above
.6
The
FAA
resu
bm
itte
d
the
additio
nal
in
form
atio
n t
o N
MFS
for
their r
evie
w a
nd c
om
men
t an
d c
onduct
ed f
urt
her
co
ord
inat
ion w
ith N
MFS
reg
ardin
g t
hei
r Conse
rvat
ion R
eco
mm
endat
ions.
7
In
resp
onse
to
th
e N
MFS
C
onse
rvat
ion
Rec
om
mendat
ions,
th
e FA
A
will
en
sure
that
the
Airport
Sponso
r, in c
onsu
ltat
ion w
ith N
MFS
HC
D,
will
dev
elo
p
a m
itig
atio
n a
nd m
onitori
ng p
lan a
s par
t of
the
404 p
erm
it p
roce
ss.
Base
d
on
the
pre
cedin
g,
NM
FS
has
in
dic
ated
that
th
e
FAA
has
co
mple
ted
its
coord
inat
ion in
ac
cord
ance
w
ith th
e M
agnuso
n-S
teve
ns
Act
. [E
mai
l fr
om
N
MFS
will
confirm
this
per
Joce
lyn 1
1-2
1-2
008]
Exce
rpt
fro
m FLL R
eco
rd o
f D
eci
sio
n S
EC
TIO
N 8
C
ON
DIT
ION
S O
F
AP
PR
OV
AL,
Su
bse
ctio
n 8
.2
IMP
LE
MEN
TA
TIO
N O
F M
ITIG
AT
ION
…..
In a
ppro
ving th
is R
OD
, th
e FA
A is
id
entify
ing m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
that
it
dee
ms
nece
ssar
y to
av
oid
or
min
imiz
e si
gnific
ant
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pac
ts
asso
ciat
ed w
ith a
ppro
val of th
e se
lect
ed a
lter
nat
ive.
Sec
tion
4
(Sum
mar
y of
Mitig
atio
n
Meas
ure
s)
of
this
RO
D
dis
cuss
es
the
mitig
ation a
ctio
ns
that
are
made
conditio
ns
of
appro
val of
this
RO
D.
(These
m
itig
ation m
easu
res
are
dis
cuss
ed g
reat
er d
etai
l in
the
Final
EIS
, Chap
ter
Eig
ht,
FAA’s
Pre
ferr
ed A
lter
nat
ive
and f
or
wet
land m
itig
atio
n in A
ppen
dix
M.3
Conce
ptu
al W
etla
nd M
itig
atio
n P
lan).
The
appro
vals
conta
ined
in t
his
RO
D
are
spec
ific
ally
co
nditio
ned
upon
full
imple
men
tation
of
these
m
itig
atio
n
mea
sure
s.
In a
ccord
ance
with 4
0 C
FR §
1505.3
, th
e F
AA w
ill t
ake
appro
pri
ate
steps,
th
rough
feder
al
gra
nt
assu
rance
s an
d
conditio
ns,
ai
rport
la
yout
pla
n
appro
vals
, an
d
contr
act
pla
ns
and
spec
ific
atio
ns,
to
en
sure
th
at
the
mitig
ation
actions
outlin
ed
in
this
RO
D
are
imple
men
ted
during
pro
ject
dev
elo
pm
ent,
and w
ill m
onitor
the
imple
men
tation o
f th
ese
mitig
atio
n a
ctio
ns
as nec
essa
ry to
as
sure
th
at re
pre
senta
tions
mad
e in
th
e Fi
nal
EIS
w
ith
resp
ect
to m
itig
atio
n ar
e ca
rrie
d out.
Thes
e m
itig
ation m
easu
res
will
be
mad
e th
e su
bje
ct of
speci
al co
nditio
ns
incl
uded
in
an
y fu
ture
gra
nts
of
feder
al f
inan
cial
ass
ista
nce
to t
he
Airport
Sponso
r.
6
Lett
er fr
om
Pau
l W
elle
r fo
r M
iles
M.
Cro
om
, Ass
ista
nt
Regio
nal
Adm
inis
trato
r, H
abitat
Conse
rvat
ion D
ivis
ion,
Nat
ional
Mar
ine
Fish
erie
s Ser
vice
, to
Vir
gin
ia L
ane,
FAA O
rlan
do
Air
port
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e,
RE:
F/S
ER4:J
K/p
w.
Dat
ed:
July
25,
2008
7
Lett
er
from
Vir
gin
ia
Lane,
FA
A
Orlan
do
Airport
s D
istr
ict
Offic
e,
to
Joce
lyn
Kar
azsi
a,
Nat
ional
M
arin
e Fi
sher
ies
Ser
vice
, w
ith
encl
osu
re
Direc
t,
Seco
ndar
y,
and
Cum
ula
tive
Effec
ts o
n E
ssen
tial
Fis
h H
abitat
. D
ated
: S
epte
mber
29,
2008.
Form
atte
d: N
ot H
ighl
ight
The
prim
ary
resp
onsi
bili
ty fo
r im
ple
men
tation of
the
mitig
atio
n m
eas
ure
s th
at
are
conditio
ns
of
appro
val of
this
RO
D lie
s w
ith t
he
Airport
Sponso
r.
The
FAA w
ill h
ave
ove
rsig
ht
resp
onsi
bili
ty t
o en
sure
the m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
are
imple
mente
d.
The
FAA f
inds
that
these
mea
sure
s co
nst
itute
all
reas
onab
le
step
s to
m
inim
ize har
m and t
hat
they
rep
rese
nt
all
pra
ctic
able
mean
s to
av
oid
or
min
imiz
e har
m t
o w
etla
nds
and o
ther
envi
ronm
enta
l har
ms
from
the
sele
cted
alter
nat
ive
and p
ropose
d fed
eral
act
ions.
