7/30/2019 Fram Work

1/2

FRAMWORKThe AFF should def, T plan v. sq or a CDOWhat args are relevWhat question judge askiningIs the plan better sqIt comes down to ADV v. DAs

FW Ethical/deontologicalPlan better than counter planProcedural like T(not really a framework but can be still)

VotersFairness

ResolutionView the judge as a rational policy maker if you can do it cheaper with less risk.

Should we treat nature like an object?What does this question have to do with the plan or the resolution?Why should it have to be addressed first?Why does this and important question to look at first?

The question the judge is asking themselves at the end of the round can swing the vote

Ground- they take away things I want and I give them more stuff. It will force a morecomparative of the argument.Predictability- expectation, in the lit baseLimits-how big is your circle.Policy(wins on fairness/education)

Limit-small v. no intep inf regretPrev-inf lit for ks dont stick to the resolutionGrd- you lose the impxs(moost predictable impacts)(they aks a new question)

they force us to start the debate over in the 2ac (best too go for)K(wins on theory)

Limit-1 interp(in practice will chane all the time the K question will change goesback to predict)

Prev- inf more inf lit, rez, K noot topical, K predict they are commonGrd- K grd lost, the way we walk into the round it is already rigged for us to lose

as it is froma political look but not our philosophical meaning that there arguments arelooked at first. MPX, N/U. we can not debate another plan for they all continueDoes the K have to defend a policy altDoes the 1ac just plan.Middle ground (run in 1ar weigh the adv against nw)

K gets alt and links to 1 ac1 ac gets mpx

When policy wins it is because the case outweighsK(craft these into there arguments and win on education)

Pol-mak restrictivePol treats people as game pieces

Philosophy K to policy (good politics)\Phil is real world (more relavent most people do not go and go get real jobs ofAgent conflation(we are not the federal government policy makes

TotalitarianFascismDestroies your sense of poltical agency you lose your self there is no place

for us to practice policyPolicy(dont drop the education by being fair you can change education)

Role playing-makes us informed citizens it teaches us how to debate it teaches ushow to function in our democratic system.

7/30/2019 Fram Work

2/2

Cede the political-the kritikal moinded people have fled so now they have controlof the government. The K increase the negative power of the government

Policy pros-we need to learn the details of the policy we need to learn theins and outs in order to help

Pragmatism- what is true works- what determines your policy is how youpractice. Changes dont happen cause of philosophical they happen by entering the would

policy and making policys to change it. Dont sit on your ass and eat some Doritos andget highEducation V. fairness

Fairness(two ships passing at night)(threashold)Clash is a prereq too education the education the K makes is not real it is

just a illusion because there is no classSwitch side debate os good(nothing is real till it is debated)Unfair X debateThere is some fairness and it is practical. Better too have some standerds

than no standereds in our court system though some people go to jail it is betterthat happen then have no system

EducationEducation is all that matters what we are learning is fist

If debate is not educated than it will cease to exist cause it isfunded because it is(same as education)

There is always education fairness is always there they have nobrink no one walks into a tournament going 3-3 2-2

K of neutrality-we are K the sq we are challenging the assumption(mpx turn) we are accepting the status quo but also rejecting it. Policy makingstatus quo they have no fairness it is about mantaing things as they are because itis to keep everything in the policy. Debate is education us too treat people aspieces and to look at the world as dollars

K affThere is some deep underloinigh

Doesnt fit withing the fiat frameworkTT pol action by the usfgResolvedColonUSFGShould defend normative action the aff has to take a policy stanceVioStanderds(see above)Only diff not neg

PolicyTplan + Kadvs(might be extra T) see that you stike to the plan but we also defend theother stuffTplan as political goal(macro politics not immediate action)(lionks to ground)

Tplan relate kinda like a plan but just explores itAdvocacy text nonTNo Text

Policy making was a answer to stocks