freedom of connection – freedom of expression: the future internet in the larger legal-regulatory...
Post on 19-Oct-2014
954 views
DESCRIPTION
Freedom of Connection – Freedom of Expression: The Future Internet in the Larger Legal-Regulatory Ecology. SESERV [Dutton]TRANSCRIPT
Freedom of Connection – Freedom of Expression: The Future Internet in the Larger Legal-Regulatory Ecology
Presentation for the SESERV and Knetworks Seminar and Workshop, St Anne’s College, University of Oxford, 28 June 2011.
William H. Dutton
Oxford Internet Institute (OII)
University of Oxford
UNESCO Request to Critically Review Status of Research on Freedom of Expression:
• Some Pioneering Studies• More Advocacy v Research• Politically Sensitive (e.g., the McBride Commission established in 1977)
• Too Narrowly Focused, e.g., Internet Content Filtering
The Internet Reconfigures Access in Ways that Can Empower Networked Individualsand Frighten Governments
Ecology of Choices Shaping Free Expression
Technical Innovations: Technologies of Disconnection
Meta-analysis of Internet filtering surveys:
• Global growth of filtering
• No single country
• Variety of Objectives:
• Political • Moral• Commercial
BUT: Potential to Decentralize, e.g., Home Hubs
Percentage of Internet Users Across Regions of the World
Regions as Percentage of the Worldwide Population of Users
Digital Rights
• Access – Freedom of Connection
• Freedom of Expression• Censorship• Equality (media literacy)• Freedom of Information• Privacy & Data Protection
• Collaboration of OII, INSEAD, and comScore for the World Economic Forum (WEF)
• Online Global Survey • Completed by 5,400 Adult Internet Users • Conducted from Oct-Nov 2010• 13 countries: Australia/New Zealand, Brazil,
Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, India, Mexico, South Africa, Spain, the United States, and the United Kingdom
The Global Internet Values Project*
*Dutta, S., Dutton, W. H. and Law, G. (2011), The New Internet World: A Global Perspective on Freedom of Expression, Privacy, Trust and Security Online. New York: The World Economic Forum, April. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1810005
_x0007_ Mexico
_x0007_ Brazil
_x000d_ South Africa
_x0006_ Italy
_x0003_ UK
_x0008_ Germany
_x0016_ Australia/New Zealand
_x0002_US
_x0006_ India
_x0006_ Spain
_x0007_ Canada
_x0007_ France
_x0005_China
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
4%
4%
3%
4%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
4%
6%
3%
8%
12%
14%
15%
19%
20%
27%
22%
23%
17%
26%
22%
23%
20%
37%
31%
41%
36%
37%
26%
41%
38%
46%
32%
40%
37%
43%
45%
44%
40%
38%
37%
36%
33%
32%
31%
31%
30%
30%
21%
Figure 1. "Access to the Internet should be a fundamental right for all people."
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
IND MEX ZAF UK USA AUS/NZ
USA BRA CHN ITA CAN ESP FRA GER0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
67% 67%
63%
58%56% 56% 56% 55% 55% 54%
52%
47% 46%44%
Figure 6. Percentage of Respondents who Support Freedom of Expression Online
Percentage of respondents who agree or strongly agree with the following questions related to freedom of ex -pression:
-"It is ok for people to express their ideas on the Inter-net, even if they are extreme."- "People should be able to express their opinion an-onymously on the Internet."- "I feel that I can express myself freely online.-"People should be free to criticize their government on the Internet."
IND ZAF MEX CHN BRA ITA ESP FRA US CAN GER UK AUS/NZ
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
7%11%
27%
32%
38%
52%
63%
69%
77% 78% 79%83% 83%
67%63%
67%
55% 55% 54%
47% 46%
56%52%
44%
58%56%
Figure 7. Support for Freedom of Expression According to In-ternet Diffusion
% of population online (2010)
Percentage of respondents who agree or strongly agree with the following questions re-lated to online freedom of expression:
Countries in order of Internet Diffusion
-"It is ok for people to express their ideas on the Internet, even if they are extreme."- "People should be able to express their opinion an-onymously on the Internet."- "I feel that I can express myself freely online.-"People should be free to criticize their government on the Internet."
Emerging Pattern of Findings Supporting Conception of a ‘New Internet World’
User-Centric Policy
• Child Protection Policy• Decency: Pornography• Libel: Defamation • Prevention of Hate Speech• Consumer Protection: Fraud• …
Copyright Mugley
Industrial Policy and Regulation
• Technology-led Industrial Strategies, support economic growth• ICT for Development (ICT4D)• Competition Policy
• IPR: Copyright • IPR: Patents
Internet Policy• Internet Governance and Regulation• Domain Names and Numbers• Net Neutrality• Licensing, Regulation of Service Providers: Intermediaries• Internationalised Top-level Domain Names
Internet Policy:Standard-setting: Identity
Security
• Secrecy, Confidentiality• Security against Malware• Counter-Radicalisation• National Security
– Blackberry Use– WikiLeaks: Confidentiality-Security
Ecology of Choices Shaping Free Expression
Encouraging Themes for Freedom of Expression
• Internet Empowering Networked Individuals – Enhancing Freedom of Connection and Expression
• Worldwide Diffusion and Support for Expression in a New Internet World
• Major Issues of Human Rights are Increasingly Being Centered on the Internet and Web
• The Internet Space is not the ‘Wild West’ – much regulation exists
Countervailing Themes
• Freedom of Expression is not an Inevitable Outcome of Technological Innovation
• Continuing Global and Local Digital Divides in Access and the Production of Content
• Global Increase in Content Filtering and Censorship
• Freedom Shaped by Choices in the Wider Ecology of Actors, Objectives and Policies
• Use of Inappropriate Models for Internet Governance and Regulation threatens to Foster ‘Over-Regulation’, e.g., fear or complacency of the ‘Old Internet World’
The Social Nature of Technical Choices?
• Technologies of Connection• Technologies of Disconnection • Will Freedom of Expression – Connection
Prevail?• What Social Concerns Will Shape the
Future Internet?