“from computer power and human reason” from “judgment to calculation” by joseph weizenbaum
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“From Computer Power and Human Reason”from “Judgment to Calculation”
by Joseph Weizenbaum
![Page 2: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Part One:
Introducing ELIZA
![Page 3: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
A program that would take in natural language and produce “natural”
language responses in the vein of a Rogerian psychotherapist.
![Page 4: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
Rogerian psychotherapy, also called Person-Centered Therapy (PCT),
involves:
1. genuineness2. empathy
3. unconditional positive regard
![Page 5: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
are limited. are formulaic.
result more from the willingness of the users than from the ability of the
computer. (non-directive method)
The interactions
![Page 6: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
are a parody.
Weizenbaum chose to represent ELIZA as DOCTOR since it avoided the
problem of having a library of real-world knowledge.
The interactions
![Page 7: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
1. “Nearly completely automatic form of psychotherapy”
![Page 8: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
2. People became “quickly and ... very deeply...emotionally involved with the computer and anthropomorphized it.”
![Page 9: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
3. ELIZA “demonstrated a general solution to the problem of computer understanding of natural language.”
![Page 10: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ELIZA/DOCTOR
Weizenbaum was appalled by the rise of responses 1-3.
They missed the point as well as extrapolated the intent of his
experiment to an ill-conceived end.
![Page 11: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Part Two:
Science as creative and subjective
![Page 12: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
“[S]ciene is creative”
“[T]he creative act in science is equivalent to the creative act in art”
“[C]reation springs only from autonomous individuals”
![Page 13: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
“[S]ciene is creative”
“[T]he creative act in science is equivalent to the creative act in art”
“[C]reation springs only from autonomous individuals”
Is this claim worth investing in?
![Page 14: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
“[S]ciene is creative”
“[T]he creative act in science is equivalent to the creative act in art”
“[C]reation springs only from autonomous individuals”
Is this claim worth investing in?
What are the equivalences between
scientific creation and
artistic creation?
![Page 15: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
“Scientific statements can never be certain; they can be only more or less credible”
A scientist “must believe [a] hypothesis together with [the supporting] theories and assumptions”
What forms credibility?
How does ELIZA/DOCTOR counter or play into our ideas of credibility and
objectivity?
![Page 16: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
“Scientific statements can never be certain; they can be only more or less credible”
A scientist “must believe [a] hypothesis together with [the supporting] theories and assumptions”
Weizenbaum goes on to say“the attribution of certainty to
scientific knowledge...has virtually delegitimized all other ways of
understanding.”
![Page 17: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Why are art and science seemingly mutually exclusive?
Weizenbaum goes on to say“the attribution of certainty to
scientific knowledge...has virtually delegitimized all other ways of
understanding.”
![Page 18: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Part Three:
Weizenbaum's monster
![Page 19: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1. “What is it about the computer that has brought the view of man as a machine to a new level of plausibility?”
“Ultimately a line dividing human and machine intelligence must be drawn.”
What is separating these poles?
![Page 20: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2. How has “man...come to yield his own autonomy to a world viewed as machine”?
“The instruments man uses become, after all, extensions of his
body...internaliz[ing] aspects of them in the form of kinesthetic and perceptual
habits”[Recall Haraway and Turing]
![Page 21: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
3. In what sense have people “ceased to believe in—let alone trust—[their] own autonomy, [and have] begun to rely on autonomous machines”?
Recall Latour's argument from “Iconoclash”, Daston & Galison's on
objectivity, the Oulipo's view of literature, etc.
![Page 22: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Part Four:
The core question
![Page 23: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
“The question is whether or not every aspect of human thought is reducible to a logical formalism, or, to put it into the modern idiom, whether or not human thought is entirely computable”
![Page 24: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
“What aspects of life are formalizable?”
Weizenbaum claims“For the only certain knowledge
science can give us is knowledge of the behavior of formal systems, that is,
systems that are games invented by man himself”
“When science purports to make statements about man's experiences, it bases them on identifications between
the primitive objects of one of its formalisms”
![Page 25: “From Computer Power and Human Reason” from “Judgment to Calculation” by Joseph Weizenbaum](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c50aef/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
“What aspects of life are formalizable?”
Are people completely comprehensible?
What about “fallible human judgment, conjecture, and intuition”?
“Of what technological genus is man species?”