functional materials from cellulose: tissue scaffolds ... · transparent, fire retardant,...
TRANSCRIPT
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Functional materials from cellulose: tissue scaffolds, formulation ingredients and printed materialsJanet L. ScottChemSpec June 2016, Basel
… or how to turn
into
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
1. delicate cellulose hydrogel based scaffolds for tissue engineering;
2. particulate rheology modifiers and emulsion stabilisers that are effective at low weight percent inclusion in aqueous (and other) formulations; and
3. robust, flame retardant composites in a range of formats from beads to sheets.
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Cellulose based scaffolds for tissue engineering
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Cellulose as a tissue scaffold material?
• Biocompatible• Foreign body reaction is relatively mild1
• Oxidised cellulose is bioresorbable2
• Not animal derived • No opportunity for contamination, e.g. with prions• Doesn’t offend religious or personal sensibilities
• Can be formed into scaffolds• Films (2D) / Hydrogels and sculpted shapes (3D)
1. T. Miyamoto, et al., J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 1989, 23, 125-1332. US 6500777, Bioresorbable oxidized cellulose composite …, Ethicon, 2002
Challenge: cellulose is a hydrophilic material with low non-specific protein adsorption; mammalian cells do not
readily attach to cellulose surfaces
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Cellulose is readily functionalised
Oxidation – negatively charged surface
Substitution – positively charged surface
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Characterisation: conductometric titration and ss NMR
[ppm]
1H – 13C CP MAS @ 10 kHz with a contact time of 2000 µs (300 MHz solid –state NMR)
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Cell attachment
400 µm
Cells attached to cationic cellulose
Cell attachment (%) =No. of cells on scaffold
Seeding density× 100
Solution: surface modification (cationic) promotes cell attachment without mediation by added proteins
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Unmodified Cationic Anionic
Cel
l atta
chm
ent
/ %
Cellulose filmsCellulose films + FBSCellulose films + RGD
UK Patent Application No. 1607802.4; J.C. Courtenay, M.A. Johns, F. Galembeck, C. Deneke, E.M. Lanzoni, C.A. Costa, J.L. Scott, R.I. Sharma, Biomaterials, 2016, submitted
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Cell spreading on scaffolds
Cationic cellulose = 24h
Blue = cell nucleusGreen = cell membrane
Cationic cellulose = 1h
Circularity = 4π (Area)/ (Perimeter)2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Control Unmodified 0.6 DS 4.7 DS 9.2 DS
MG
63 c
ell c
ircul
arity
Scaffold
1h - Circularity 24 h - Circularity
Cell circularity factor = measure of spreading 1 = cell is circular, 0 = cell is spreading
Blue = cell nucleusGreen = cell membrane
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Cells attach and spread on cationisedcellulose without intervention of proteins or ligands
Cellulose scaffold bearing positive surface charge
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Bacterial cellulose films with modified surfaces
Surface topography inferred from tip amplitude measurements in electrostatic force microscopy (1 µm2 sample)
400 nm 400 nm 400 nm
UK Patent Application No. 1607802.4; J.C. Courtenay, M.A. Johns, F. Galembeck, C. Deneke, E.M. Lanzoni, C.A. Costa, J.L. Scott, R.I. Sharma, Biomaterials, 2016, submitted
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Capacitive coupling (dC/dz)
Unmodified Anionic Cationic
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Dis
tribu
tion
of d
C/d
z/
AU
Capacitive coupling, dC/dz / AU
UnmodifiedAnionicCationic
UK Patent Application No. 1607802.4; J.C. Courtenay, M.A. Johns, F. Galembeck, C. Deneke, E.M. Lanzoni, C.A. Costa, J.L. Scott, R.I. Sharma, Biomaterials, 2016, submitted
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Influence of degree of modification on dC/dz
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0Cap
aciti
ve c
oupl
ing,
dC
/dz
/ AU
Degree of Substitution / %
Low degrees of modification promote cell attachment; scaffolds have the materials properties associated with
cellulose, yet allow attachment without mediating proteins
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
More sophisticated scaffolds
Not yet cleared for publication to be covered in lecture
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Cellulose based Formulation Ingredients: rheology modifiers
and Pickering emulsions
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Nanofibrillar oxidized cellulose as a key formulation ingredient in greener personal care products
ca 20 % of 1°alcohol oxidised
R. J. Crawford, K. J. Edler, S. Lindhoud, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 300-303R. J. Crawford, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, PCT patent WO2010076292, 2010
oxidize &disperse
formulate
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Partially C(6) oxidised cellulose
---
-- --
-- -
-- -
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
++
+
+
++
++
+
+
+++
+
++
++
++++
++
+++
++
Not dissolved! Well-dispersed fibrils with surface charge; bacterial cellulose X sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC) hybrid
Surfactantinteractions?
thixotropicgels
ca 20 % of 1°alcohol oxidised
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Application in personal care products
Sprayable gels, including alcohol containing gels
Creams / lotions
oil in water emulsions
R. J. Crawford, K. J. Edler, S. Lindhoud, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 300-303R. J. Crawford, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, PCT patent WO2010076292, 2010
J. L. Scott, C. Smith, G. Unali, PCT patent application WO2012171725, 2012
Rheology modifier in reduced surfactant
formulations
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Sprayable gels - effect of alcohols on structure
Gravimetric “gel content”
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Sprayable gels – effect of ethanol on structure
Best fit models to Ethanol SAXS data
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Elliptical cylinder P P P P X X X X X
Minor radius / Å 18(1) 17(1) 18(1) 19(1)
major/minor ratio 3(1) 3(1) 3(1) 2(1)
Lamellar structure X X X X P P P P P
bilayer thickness / Å 33(1) 35(1) 35(1)
Formation of sheet-like structures as alcohol content increases
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Change in gel structure - methanol
Dispersed OC (0.8 g L-1), 40 mM SDS
Dispersed OC (0.8 g L-1)
Supercritical drying after solvent exchange to methanol
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Rheology modifier for API formulations
• Stable and tolerant of alcohols• Shear thinning (easy to apply or spray)• Non-allergenic, non-irritant• Non sticky with a pleasant “soft” skin feel• Any advantages in API delivery through the skin?
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
0 2 4 6 80
200
400
600
800
Time (hr)C
um
ula
tive
ib
up
rofe
n
perm
eate
d (
mg
/cm
2) Sainsbury's Gel
IbuleveFormulation BFormulation CFormulation DFormulation E
Market 1, HEC, 5% active
Market 2, carbomer, 5% active
A, oxcell, 1% active
B, oxcell, 1% active
C, oxcell, 1% active
D, oxcell, 1% active
data points slightly displaced on the time axis
2 4 6 80
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Time (hr)
Cu
mu
lati
ve ib
up
rofe
n
rele
as
ed
(m
g/c
m2)
B
A
Sainsbury's
Ibuleve
A, oxcell, 1% active
B, oxcell, 1% active
Market 1, HEC, 5% active
Market 2, carbomer, 5% active
Silicone membranein vitro
Porcine skinin vitro
D. Celebi, R.H. Guy, K.J. Edler, J.L. Scott, Int, J Pharmaceutics, 2016, submitted
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Creams – particle stabilised O/W emulsions
Emulsion stabiliser in creams and lotions
J. L. Scott, C. Smith, G. Unali, PCT patent application WO2012171725, 2012.
• Pickering emulsions • Consistent droplet size• Stable • Pleasant tactile properties
tetradecane / water plus dispersed oxidised cellulose
0 g/L oxidised cellulose 15 g/L
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Creams – particle stabilised O/W emulsions
freeze-dried hexane/water emulsion
Pickering emulsions
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Oxidised cellulose – a versatile ingredient
• Simplified formulation “chassis” and reduced number of ingredients• Good tactile properties – remarkable “skin feel” with no stickiness• Versatile ingredient - sprayable lotions to spreadable creams• Excellent emulsion stabilisation• Maintains suspensions - no particulate settling• Potential for use in mild skin treatment formulations
Limitations• Tolerant of lower alcohols, but not glycerol• Incompatible with cationic surfactants (cationic particles?)
… opportunity to use the same the principles to produce a cationic version
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
Materials to Enable Electronics Recovery and Recycling
Closed Loop Emotionally Valuable E-waste Recovery
If the consumer is attached to the device’ appearance or feel
They might be inclined to return it to the manufacturer for upgrade
Allowing rapid exchange of
superannuated hardware
Upgraded device is immediately returned
to the customer
To recycling or material recovery
Skeleton: the support components inside the device
Organs: the high-tech electronics that deliver the function
Skin: the outer casing, or the part that the user interacts with directlySkin
Complete disassembly required to allow recovery of components and/or metals
rejected components
decompose, skeleton
recover valuable
parts
recover valuable metals
valuable components & elements
???
Skeleton requirements• Robust• Rigid / flexible• Non-conductive• Non-flammable• Smooth • Printable• Processible• Degradable (triggered)
… CHEAP!
Cellulose processing
Dissolve in IL
Blend filler(s)
Cast / form
Set and leach
Surface treat
recover ionic liquid
Cellulose films – inorganic fillers
Cellulose film from 15 wt % solutionin ionic liquid (cross section)
Cellulose film with 15 % filler from 15 wt % solution in ionic
liquid (cross section)
Cellulose films - fire retardant fillersCellulose film 50 wt% fire retardant filler
Cellulose film with increasing quantities of nanoclay filler
5 wt % 10 wt % 20 wt %
Cellulose films – surface coated
Cellulose film
Cellulose film + 10 wt % nanoclay
Cellulose film coated with hydrophobising agent
Cellulose film + 10 wt % nanoclaycoated with hydrophobising agent
58 ° 97 °
117°48 °
ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate
Conductive ink printing
surface treateduntreated
cellulose filmsno filler
cellulose filmswith 20 % filler
Transparent, fire retardant, printable, biodegradable cellulose films
Details not yet cleared for publication to be covered in lecture
High filler content filmparticles too large – not transparent
surface suitable for conductive printingreasonable flame retardancy
degradation w cellulases
Low filler content filmtransparent
surface suitable for conductive printinggood flame retardancy
excellent degradation w cellulases
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies
AcknowledgementsUniversity of Bath:Professor Karen EdlerDr Saskia LindhoudDr Duygu Celebi, Yun JinProfessor Richard GuyDr Ram SharmaJamie Courtenay, Marcus JohnsReggie WirawanCLEVER:Dr Debra Lilley, Alan Manley and Dr Grace Smalley, Loughborough UniversityDr Ben Bridgens and Dr Keertika Balasundaram, Newcastle UniversityDr Kersty Hobson, Cardiff UniversityDr Nicholas Lynch, University of OxfordDr Janet L. Scott, Dr Saravanan Chandrasekaran, Dr Alvaro Cruz-Izquierdo, University of BathIndustrial: Unilever, Croda, Rockwood Additives (FR&SH, oxcell)
University of Campinas, Brazil:Professor Fernando GalembeckLNNano, Brazil:Dr Christoph DenekeDr Evandro M. Lanzoni and Dr Carlos A. CostaUniversity of East AngliaProfessor Yaroslav KimyakDr Susana Campos E Menezes Jorge Ramalhete