functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in alligator mississippiensis

6
Corrigendum Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis Vivian Allen, Ruth M. Elsey, Nicola Jones, Jordon Wright and John R. Hutchinson Journal of Anatomy (2010) 216, pp. 423–445 doi: 10.1111 j.1469-7580.2009.01202.x The normalisation of average muscle architecture data for adult American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis of +10 Kg body mass) was performed using an incorrect divisor. Rather than normalisation of muscle architecture data using division by derivations of body mass (body mass 0.67 for area measures such as muscle physiological cross-sectional area [PCSA], and body mass 0.33 for linear measurements such as muscle fascicle lengths), data from an older dataset normalised using division by derivations of body volume were mistakenly included in the final manuscript. In Table 2 (pp. 427–428) and Table 3 (pp. 429–450), the values quoted for the following data are one factor of ten too large: average normalised fascicle length (column 6, L fasc M body 0.33 and column seven, its standard deviation), average normalised tendon length (column 12, L tend M body 0.33 and column 13, its standard deviation). The values quoted for average normalised muscle PCSA (column 14, PCSA M body 0.67 and column 15, its standard deviation) are two factors of ten too large. Correspond- ingly, the values on the scale bar on the X-axis for Figures 1 and 2 (pp431) are two factors of ten too large, and the values on the scale bar on the Y-axis for Figures 1 and 2 are one factor of ten too large. Values quoted for average normalised fascicle length and PCSA in the following sections of text are also incorrect by one and two factors of ten, respectively. Results: Mean distribution of fascicle length, pennation angle and PCSA (pp. 432, column 1) and; Results: Mean distribution of external tendons, lengths and masses (pp. 432, columns 1–2). Corrected Figure 1 and Tables 2 and 3 is now provided below. The results of the scaling analysis (which used un-normalised, raw data), and all qualitative conclusions on the functional spe- cialisation of limb musculature in A. mississippiensis are unaffected by this error. The authors would like to apologise for this oversight. ª 2011 The Authors Journal of Anatomy ª 2011 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland J. Anat. (2011) 219, pp542–547 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01422.x Journal of Anatomy

Upload: vivian-allen

Post on 15-Jul-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis

Corrigendum

Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis

Vivian Allen, Ruth M. Elsey, Nicola Jones, Jordon Wright and John R. Hutchinson

Journal of Anatomy (2010) 216, pp. 423–445

doi: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1469-7580.2009.01202.x

The normalisation of average muscle architecture data for adult American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis of +10 Kg

body mass) was performed using an incorrect divisor. Rather than normalisation of muscle architecture data using division by

derivations of body mass (body mass0.67 for area measures such as muscle physiological cross-sectional area [PCSA], and body

mass0.33 for linear measurements such as muscle fascicle lengths), data from an older dataset normalised using division by

derivations of body volume were mistakenly included in the final manuscript.

In Table 2 (pp. 427–428) and Table 3 (pp. 429–450), the values quoted for the following data are one factor of ten too large:

average normalised fascicle length (column 6, Lfasc ⁄ Mbody0.33 and column seven, its standard deviation), average normalised

tendon length (column 12, Ltend ⁄ Mbody0.33 and column 13, its standard deviation). The values quoted for average normalised

muscle PCSA (column 14, PCSA ⁄ Mbody0.67 and column 15, its standard deviation) are two factors of ten too large. Correspond-

ingly, the values on the scale bar on the X-axis for Figures 1 and 2 (pp431) are two factors of ten too large, and the values on

the scale bar on the Y-axis for Figures 1 and 2 are one factor of ten too large. Values quoted for average normalised fascicle

length and PCSA in the following sections of text are also incorrect by one and two factors of ten, respectively.

Results: Mean distribution of fascicle length, pennation angle and PCSA (pp. 432, column 1) and;

Results: Mean distribution of external tendons, lengths and masses (pp. 432, columns 1–2).

Corrected Figure 1 and Tables 2 and 3 is now provided below.

The results of the scaling analysis (which used un-normalised, raw data), and all qualitative conclusions on the functional spe-

cialisation of limb musculature in A. mississippiensis are unaffected by this error.

The authors would like to apologise for this oversight.

ªª 2011 The AuthorsJournal of Anatomy ªª 2011 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

J. Anat. (2011) 219, pp542–547 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01422.x

Journal of Anatomy

Page 2: Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis

A

B

ªª 2011 The AuthorsJournal of Anatomy ªª 2011 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Corrigendum 543

Page 3: Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis

Tab

le2

Ave

rage

musc

lepro

per

ties

inth

epec

tora

llim

bof

adult

(10

±K

g)

A.

mis

siss

ippie

nsi

s.

Mu

scle

Ab

v.

Fun

ctio

nal

Gro

up

Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3

SD L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3h

(�)

SDh

(�)

Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

SD L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

SD PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

Rh

om

bo

deu

sR

HO

Scap

ula

r

Ad

du

cto

rs

0.0

2027%

0.0

0742%

0.5

48%

0.1

14%

37

––

––

0.0

0363%

0.0

0158%

Serr

atu

sve

ntr

ali

s

cerv

icu

s

SVC

Scap

ula

r

Ad

du

cto

rs

0.0

4954%

0.0

0701%

1.2

26%

0.1

27%

––

––

––

0.0

0384%

0.0

0062%

Serr

atu

sve

ntr

ali

s

tho

raci

s

SVT

Scap

ula

Flexo

rs

0.1

3247%

0.0

0811%

1.6

73%

0.3

51%

49

––

––

0.0

0762%

0.0

0142%

Lati

ssim

usd

ors

iLD

Scap

ula

r

Ext

en

sors

0.0

8161%

0.0

0407%

2.1

04%

0.2

05%

––

––

––

0.0

0369%

0.0

0038%

Leva

tor

scap

ula

eLS

Scap

ula

r

Ext

en

sors

0.1

7753%

0.0

2144%

2.5

60%

0.3

12%

––

––

––

0.0

0661%

0.0

0109%

Tra

pezi

us

TR

ASc

ap

ula

r

Ext

en

sors

0.0

5444%

0.0

1585%

1.7

66%

0.1

74%

––

––

––

0.0

0293%

0.0

0088%

Co

sto

cora

coid

eu

s

pro

fun

du

s

CO

CP

Co

raco

idal

Retr

act

ors

0.0

1384%

0.0

0468%

0.8

39%

0.2

31%

26

––

––

0.0

0162%

0.0

0073%

Co

sto

cora

coid

eu

s

sup

erfi

ciali

s

CO

CS

Co

raco

idal

Retr

act

ors

0.0

7405%

0.0

0973%

1.8

88%

0.2

53%

13

––

––

0.0

0378%

0.0

0088%

Delt

oid

eu

s

scap

ula

ris

DS

Sho

uld

er

Ab

du

cto

rs

0.0

3163%

0.0

0248%

0.6

53%

0.1

78%

26

40.0

0058%

0.0

0016%

0.6

20%

0.1

48%

0.0

0426%

0.0

0079%

Scap

ulo

hu

mera

lis

cau

dali

s

SHC

Sho

uld

er

Ab

du

cto

rs

0.0

2722%

0.0

0541%

1.1

02%

0.2

23%

––

––

––

0.0

0236%

0.0

0046%

Tere

sm

ajo

rTM

Sho

uld

er

Ab

du

cto

rs

0.0

2958%

0.0

0168%

1.4

52%

0.2

91%

14

21

0.0

0057%

0.0

0012%

0.5

08%

0.1

64%

0.0

0183%

0.0

0048%

Pect

ora

lis

PEC

Sho

uld

er

Flexo

rs⁄

Ad

du

cto

rs

0.6

9038%

0.0

3229%

4.2

88%

0.5

28%

––

––

––

0.0

1538%

0.0

0199%

Co

rach

ob

rach

iali

s

bre

vis

ven

trali

s

CB

VSh

ou

lder

Flexo

rs⁄

Ad

du

cto

rs

0.0

5209%

0.0

0734%

1.5

32%

0.2

45%

––

––

––

0.0

0328%

0.0

0079%

Sub

scap

ula

ris

SSSh

ou

lder

Flexo

rs⁄

Ad

du

cto

rs

0.0

8206%

0.0

4538%

1.2

14%

0.3

15%

12

18

––

––

0.0

0616%

0.0

0350%

Co

rach

ob

rach

iali

s

bre

vis

do

rsali

s

CB

DSh

ou

lder

Ext

en

sors

0.0

1187%

0.0

0942%

0.8

88%

0.2

09%

––

––

––

0.0

0119%

0.0

0067%

Delt

oid

eu

s

clavi

cula

ris

DC

Sho

uld

er

Ext

en

sors

0.0

8466%

0.0

1145%

1.9

81%

0.3

26%

––

––

––

0.0

0414%

0.0

0091%

Sup

raco

raco

ideu

sSC

Sho

uld

er

Ext

en

sors

0.0

9382%

0.0

1445%

1.7

06%

0.1

40%

––

––

––

0.0

0520%

0.0

0072%

Ab

du

cto

rra

dia

lis

AB

-RElb

ow

Flexo

rs

0.0

0952%

0.0

0076%

0.4

02%

0.0

60%

26

20.0

00029%

0.0

00000%

0.3

11%

0.0

00%

0.0

0204%

0.0

0031%

ªª 2011 The AuthorsJournal of Anatomy ªª 2011 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Corrigendum544

Page 4: Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis

Tab

le2

(Continued

)

Mu

scle

Ab

v.

Fun

ctio

nal

Gro

up

Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3

SD L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3h

(�)

SDh

(�)

Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

SD L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

SD PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

Bic

ep

sb

rach

iiB

BElb

ow

Flexo

rs0.0

4945%

0.0

0377%

1.8

31%

0.3

89%

911

0.0

0109%

0.0

0018%

1.1

76%

0.1

12%

0.0

0253%

0.0

0033%

Bra

chia

lis

BR

Elb

ow

Flexo

rs0.0

2071%

0.0

0226%

1.7

15%

0.2

87%

––

––

––

0.0

0117%

0.0

0024%

Flexo

ru

lnari

sFU

LElb

ow

Flexo

rs0.0

1511%

0.0

0359%

0.4

30%

0.1

49%

23

30.0

0032%

0.0

0020%

0.3

98%

0.2

23%

0.0

0328%

0.0

0102%

Hu

mero

rad

iali

sH

RElb

ow

Flexo

rs0.0

3251%

0.0

0859%

1.8

57%

0.1

46%

––

0.0

0068%

0.0

0054%

0.5

89%

0.2

24%

0.0

0166%

0.0

0046%

Tri

cep

slo

ng

us

late

ralu

s

TLL

Sho

uld

er

Flexo

rs⁄E

lbo

w

Ext

en

sors

0.0

9019%

0.0

1047%

1.1

76%

0.1

24%

24

50.0

0120%

0.0

0060%

0.8

08%

0.4

12%

0.0

0669%

0.0

0124%

Tri

cep

slo

ng

us

med

iali

s

TLM

Sho

uld

er

Flexo

rs⁄E

lbo

w

Ext

en

sors

0.0

8103%

0.0

1296%

1.0

48%

0.1

79%

24

40.0

0289%

0.0

0180%

2.0

73%

1.1

24%

0.0

0680%

0.0

0139%

Tri

cep

sb

revi

s

cau

dali

s

TB

CD

Elb

ow

Ext

en

sors

0.0

5299%

0.0

0936%

0.9

47%

0.1

49%

25

20.0

0103%

0.0

0055%

0.7

38%

0.3

57%

0.0

0486%

0.0

0098%

Tri

cep

sb

revi

s

cran

iali

s

TB

CR

Elb

ow

Ext

en

sors

0.0

7647%

0.0

1448%

0.9

10%

0.2

60%

30

50.0

0623%

0.0

0666%

0.9

40%

0.2

70%

0.0

0707%

0.0

0153%

Tri

cep

sb

revi

s

inte

rmed

ius

TB

IElb

ow

Ext

en

sors

0.0

8004%

0.0

1810%

0.9

08%

0.0

91%

26

60.0

0624%

0.0

0357%

0.6

60%

0.2

51%

0.0

0740%

0.0

0126%

Pro

nato

r

qu

ad

ratu

s

PQ

Elb

ow

Pro

nato

rs0.0

3271%

0.0

0395%

0.4

54%

0.0

90%

30

3–

––

–0.0

0600%

0.0

0098%

Pro

nato

rte

res

PT

Elb

ow

Pro

nato

rs0.0

4340%

0.0

0365%

0.6

00%

0.0

57%

27

50.0

0025%

0.0

0000%

0.1

81%

0.0

00%

0.0

0608%

0.0

0074%

Sup

inato

rSU

PElb

ow

Sup

inato

rs

0.0

2392%

0.0

0256%

1.0

66%

0.1

75%

25

20.0

0137%

0.0

0000%

0.9

58%

0.0

00%

0.0

0199%

0.0

0055%

Ext

en

sor

carp

i

rad

iali

sb

revi

s

EC

R-B

Wri

st

Do

rsifl

exo

rs

0.0

1227%

0.0

0191%

0.6

04%

0.0

88%

20

11

0.0

0038%

0.0

0012%

0.5

74%

0.4

70%

0.0

0178%

0.0

0030%

Ext

en

sor

carp

i

rad

iali

slo

ng

us

EC

R-L

Wri

st

Do

rsifl

exo

rs

0.0

1205%

0.0

0240%

0.5

80%

0.0

67%

20

20.0

0063%

0.0

0032%

0.8

49%

0.3

44%

0.0

0187%

0.0

0046%

Ext

en

sor

carp

i

uln

ari

slo

ng

us

EC

U-L

Wri

st

Do

rsifl

exo

rs

0.0

1082%

0.0

0145%

0.8

34%

0.1

39%

15

80.0

0067%

0.0

0018%

1.5

51%

0.1

17%

0.0

0120%

0.0

0026%

Flexo

rca

rpi

uln

ari

s

FCU

Wri

st

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs

0.0

3537%

0.0

0432%

0.3

79%

0.0

81%

29

40.0

0083%

0.0

0054%

0.6

07%

0.4

50%

0.0

0799%

0.0

0176%

Flexo

rd

igit

oru

m

lon

gu

s1

(fo

re)

FDL1

Wri

st

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs

0.0

0876%

0.0

0131%

0.7

94%

0.2

10%

22

30.0

0139%

0.0

0185%

––

0.0

0102%

0.0

0028%

Flexo

rd

igit

oru

m

lon

gu

s2

(fo

re)

FDL2

Wri

st

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs

0.0

2517%

0.0

0520%

0.4

26%

0.0

75%

25

30.0

0407%

0.0

0183%

1.5

59%

0.3

80%

0.0

0505%

0.0

0050%

Ext

en

sor

dig

ito

rum

sup

erfi

ciali

s

ED

SD

igit

al

Do

rsifl

exo

rs

0.0

1561%

0.0

0257%

0.4

28%

0.1

29%

22

12

0.0

0007%

0.0

0000%

––

0.0

0328%

0.0

0087%

Flexo

rd

igit

oru

m

bre

vis

(fo

re)

FDB

FD

igit

al

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs

0.0

4061%

0.0

3293%

0.3

45%

0.0

64%

29

15

1.5

0E-0

56.8

1E-0

60.7

45%

0.4

51%

0.0

0890%

0.0

0761%

ªª 2011 The AuthorsJournal of Anatomy ªª 2011 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Corrigendum 545

Page 5: Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis

Tab

le3

Ave

rage

musc

lepro

per

ties

inth

epel

vic

limb

of

adult

(10

±K

g)

A.

mis

siss

ippie

nsi

s.

Mu

scle

Ab

v.

Fun

ctio

nal

Gro

up

Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3

SD L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3h

(�)

SDh

(�)

Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

SD L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

SD PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

Cau

do

fem

ora

lis

bre

vis

CFB

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.1

3636%

0.0

1831%

2.6

18%

0.2

11%

46

––

0.8

66%

0.0

00%

0.0

0487%

0.0

0042%

Cau

do

fem

ora

lis

lon

gu

s

CFL

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

1.3

9420%

0.6

9839%

6.5

94%

0.7

00%

20

23

0.0

0743%

0.0

0126%

2.6

78%

0.7

97%

0.0

1735%

0.0

0955%

Flexo

rti

bia

lis

ext

ern

us

FTE

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.5

2868%

0.7

8821%

3.8

41%

0.2

66%

819

0.0

0563%

0.0

0268%

3.0

82%

1.3

22%

0.0

1272%

0.0

1953%

Flexo

rti

bia

lis

inte

rnu

s1

FTI1

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.0

2355%

0.0

0409%

3.5

61%

0.3

14%

––

0.0

0007%

0.0

0001%

0.2

62%

0.0

42%

0.0

0063%

0.0

0013%

Flext

or

tib

iali

s

inte

rnu

s2

FTI2

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.1

3574%

0.0

0447%

4.4

63%

1.1

82%

25

0.0

0090%

0.0

0029%

0.5

05%

0.2

18%

0.0

0311%

0.0

0119%

Flexo

rti

bia

lis

inte

rnu

s3

FTI3

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.0

6933%

0.0

0393%

1.9

93%

0.1

78%

13

11

0.0

0043%

0.0

0030%

0.5

26%

0.4

39%

0.0

0318%

0.0

0041%

Flexo

rti

bia

lis

inte

rnu

s4

FTI4

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.0

3439%

0.0

0358%

3.2

42%

0.4

56%

––

0.0

0084%

0.0

0031%

1.0

20%

0.4

59%

0.0

0102%

0.0

0019%

Ilio

fib

ula

ris

ILFB

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.0

5515%

0.0

0640%

3.5

52%

0.5

34%

––

0.0

0068%

0.0

0032%

1.0

44%

0.1

57%

0.0

0151%

0.0

0038%

Isch

iotr

och

an

teri

cus

ISTR

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.0

3338%

0.0

1589%

0.7

95%

0.0

95%

33

80.0

0201%

0.0

0148%

0.6

51%

0.3

13%

0.0

0329%

0.0

0153%

Pu

bo

-isc

hio

-tib

iali

sPIT

Hip

Ext

en

sors

⁄Kn

ee

Flexo

rs

0.0

5114%

0.0

2539%

3.6

94%

0.5

82%

57

0.0

0049%

0.0

0031%

0.3

57%

0.1

74%

0.0

0138%

0.0

0074%

Pu

bo

-isc

hio

-

fem

ora

lis

ext

ern

us

1

PIF

E1

Hip

Flexo

rs0.1

1409%

0.0

1461%

2.9

35%

0.7

94%

511

0.0

0084%

0.0

0039%

0.6

68%

0.3

03%

0.0

0383%

0.0

0116%

Pu

bo

-isc

hio

-

fem

ora

lis

inte

rnu

s1

PIF

I1H

ipFl

exo

rs0.1

1971%

0.0

0923%

2.5

19%

0.5

04%

––

––

––

0.0

0466%

0.0

0107%

Pu

bo

-isc

hio

-

fem

ora

lis

inte

rnu

s2

PIF

I2H

ipFl

exo

rs0.4

9982%

0.0

6341%

3.9

01%

0.3

43%

––

0.0

0308%

0.0

0091%

1.2

14%

0.5

14%

0.0

1218%

0.0

0201%

Ilio

fem

ora

lis

IFH

ipA

bd

uct

ors

0.0

9494%

0.0

0629%

1.6

34%

0.2

19%

15

15

-–

––

0.0

0518%

0.0

0059%

Ad

du

cto

r1

AD

D1

Hip

Ad

du

cto

rs0.0

9812%

0.0

1788%

3.6

57%

0.4

37%

––

-–

––

0.0

0261%

0.0

0077%

Ad

du

cto

r2

AD

D2

Hip

Ad

du

cto

rs0.0

4565%

0.0

0498%

4.0

34%

0.5

07%

––

0.0

0222%

0.0

0000%

0.1

94%

0.0

00%

0.0

0108%

0.0

0018%

Pu

bo

-isc

hio

-

fem

ora

lis

ext

ern

us

2

PIF

E2

Hip

Ad

du

cto

rs0.1

1381%

0.0

1523%

1.8

08%

0.3

15%

24

15

0.0

0048%

0.0

0018%

0.4

05%

0.2

07%

0.0

0537%

0.0

0107%

Pu

bo

-isc

hio

-

fem

ora

lis

ext

ern

us

3

PIF

E3

Hip

Ad

du

cto

rs0.0

8071%

0.0

1316%

1.3

46%

0.1

09%

21

12

0.0

0054%

0.0

0054%

0.3

63%

0.1

47%

0.0

0520%

0.0

0097%

Am

bie

ns

1A

MB

1K

nee

Ext

en

sors

0.0

9250%

0.0

0523%

1.9

15%

0.2

63%

811

0.0

0284%

0.0

0038%

2.5

54%

0.8

99%

0.0

0449%

0.0

0054%

Am

bie

ns

2A

MB

2K

nee

Ext

en

sors

0.0

1504%

0.0

0570%

1.4

46%

0.6

29%

911

0.0

0049%

0.0

0028%

0.5

91%

0.6

71%

0.0

0110%

0.0

0063%

Fem

oro

tib

iali

s

ext

ern

us

FMTE

Kn

ee

Ext

en

sors

0.0

5950%

0.0

0633%

0.8

74%

0.0

64%

30

20.0

0094%

0.0

0042%

0.5

64%

0.2

48%

0.0

0561%

0.0

0086%

ªª 2011 The AuthorsJournal of Anatomy ªª 2011 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Corrigendum546

Page 6: Functional specialization and ontogenetic scaling of limb anatomy in Alligator mississippiensis

Tab

le3

(Continued

)

Mu

scle

Ab

v.

Fun

ctio

nal

Gro

up

Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mm

usc

⁄M

bo

dy

L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3

SD L fasc

⁄M

bo

dy0.3

3h

(�)

SDh

(�)

Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

SD Mte

nd

⁄M

bo

dy

L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

SD L ten

d⁄

Mb

od

y0.3

3

PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

SD PC

SA⁄

Mb

od

y0.6

7

Fem

oro

tib

iali

s

inte

rnu

s

FMTI

Kn

ee

Ext

en

sors

0.1

9254%

0.0

1701%

1.0

92%

0.1

21%

33

50.0

1007%

0.0

0344%

0.7

58%

0.2

57%

0.0

1401%

0.0

0146%

Ilio

tib

iali

s1

IT1

Kn

ee

Ext

en

sors

0.0

2839%

0.0

0269%

2.2

93%

0.2

48%

––

––

––

0.0

0119%

0.0

0025%

Ilio

tib

iali

s2

IT2

Kn

ee

Ext

en

sors

0.1

8669%

0.0

0815%

1.5

36%

0.2

15%

30

40.0

0323%

0.0

0115%

1.7

96%

0.7

42%

0.0

1005%

0.0

0138%

Ilio

tib

iali

s3

IT3

Kn

ee

Ext

en

sors

0.0

5251%

0.0

0640%

1.6

00%

0.6

81%

22

20.0

0148%

0.0

0038%

1.8

21%

1.6

68%

0.0

0321%

0.0

0112%

Ext

en

sor

dig

ito

rum

lon

gu

s

ED

LA

nkle

Do

rsifl

exo

rs0.0

7436%

0.0

0801%

1.7

86%

0.4

64%

20

10

0.0

0095%

0.0

0026%

1.0

09%

0.1

25%

0.0

0385%

0.0

0100%

Tib

iali

san

teri

or

TA

An

kle

Do

rsifl

exo

rs0.0

4777%

0.0

0600%

2.8

09%

0.2

32%

--

0.0

0049%

0.0

0009%

0.4

74%

0.0

77%

0.0

0161%

0.0

0019%

Fib

ula

ris

bre

vis

FBA

nkle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.0

1385%

0.0

0132%

0.6

07%

0.1

15%

25

60.0

0037%

0.0

0022%

0.2

73%

0.1

05%

0.0

0200%

0.0

0040%

Flexo

rd

igit

oru

m

lon

gu

s(h

ind

)

FDLH

An

kle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.0

3203%

0.0

2360%

0.6

61%

0.2

19%

26

40.0

0440%

0.0

0392%

2.1

77%

1.1

76%

0.0

0434%

0.0

0261%

Flexo

rh

all

ucu

s

lon

gu

s

FHL

An

kle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.0

1924%

0.0

0258%

0.7

29%

0.1

57%

23

10.0

0318%

0.0

0196%

1.8

41%

0.5

19%

0.0

0234%

0.0

0030%

Fib

ula

ris

lon

gu

sFL

An

kle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.0

3196%

0.0

0336%

0.6

76%

0.1

72%

28

20.0

0086%

0.0

0044%

0.4

24%

0.2

07%

0.0

0416%

0.0

0115%

Gast

rocn

em

ius

?tu

l=1>

ext

ern

us

GE

An

kle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.1

5581%

0.0

2036%

0.9

98%

0.1

69%

29

60.0

1249%

0.0

1600%

1.7

29%

1.4

81%

0.0

1301%

0.0

0184%

Gast

rocn

em

ius

inte

rnu

s

GI

An

kle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.0

6311%

0.0

0599%

2.6

73%

0.2

07%

910

0.0

0135%

0.0

0115%

0.6

59%

0.3

37%

0.0

0218%

0.0

0025%

Inte

ross

ess

us

cru

riIC

An

kle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.0

5599%

0.0

0395%

0.6

83%

0.2

24%

29

10

0.0

0254%

0.0

0067%

1.3

66%

0.3

43%

0.0

0709%

0.0

0166%

Pro

nato

rp

rofu

nd

us

PP

An

kle

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs0.0

1216%

0.0

0263%

0.5

52%

0.0

81%

23

14

––

––

0.0

0189%

0.0

0027%

Ext

en

sor

dig

ito

rum

bre

vis

ED

BD

igit

al

Do

rsifl

exo

rs0.0

3273%

0.0

1220%

0.6

35%

0.1

35%

29

11

0.0

0212%

0.0

0239%

0.7

22%

0.5

16%

0.0

0445%

0.0

0218%

Ext

en

sor

hall

uci

s

bre

vis

EH

BD

igit

al

Do

rsifl

exo

rs0.0

1326%

0.0

0163%

0.6

39%

0.1

21%

16

13

0.0

0048%

0.0

0023%

0.5

50%

0.2

92%

0.0

0177%

0.0

0029%

Ext

en

sor

hall

uci

s

lon

gu

s

EH

LD

igit

al

Do

rsifl

exo

rs0.0

0922%

0.0

0163%

0.8

42%

0.1

44%

36

11

0.0

0038%

0.0

0030%

0.3

21%

0.0

61%

0.0

0098%

0.0

0015%

Flexo

rd

igit

oru

m

bre

vis

(hin

d)

FDB

HD

igit

al

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs

0.0

1799%

0.0

0113%

0.3

47%

0.0

47%

27

60.0

0182%

0.0

0111%

0.5

03%

0.3

41%

0.0

0436%

0.0

0085%

Flexo

rh

all

ucu

s

bre

vis

FHB

Dig

ital

Pla

nta

rflexo

rs

0.0

4061%

0.0

3293%

0.3

45%

0.0

64%

24

13

0.0

0150%

0.0

0068%

0.7

45%

0.4

51%

0.0

0890%

0.0

0761%

ªª 2011 The AuthorsJournal of Anatomy ªª 2011 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Corrigendum 547