further dissemination unlimited approved for public release; library/… · foundation for...

Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited

By Janis D. Aardal at 5:27 pm, Sep 21, 2012

Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited

h3310581

Typewritten Text

h3310581

Typewritten Text

h3310581

Typewritten Text

Volume 2

h3310581

Typewritten Text

h3310581

Typewritten Text

h3310581

Typewritten Text

h3310581

Typewritten Text

h3310581

Typewritten Text

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

h3310581

Typewritten Text

HNF-53496 Revision 0 Volume 2

h3310581

Typewritten Text

2012 Facilities Master Plan Volume 2 – Appendices

h3310581

Typewritten Text

HNF-53496 Revision 0 Volume 2

h3310581

Typewritten Text

HNF-53496, VOL 2, REV 0

ii


HNF-53496, VOL2, REV 0

A-i

APPENDIX A

SECTION 1.0 SUPPORT - INTRODUCTION


A-ii



A-1

APPENDIX A

SECTION 1.0 SUPPORT - INTRODUCTION

Table A-1. Contractor Facility Management by Area. (Section 1.2)

Managing Contractor by Area

# of Facilities

Gross ft2

100 Area 37 118,670

CHPRC 26 76,646

WCH 11 42,024

200E 138 922,566

CHPRC 54 233,950

MSA 25 291,229

WRPS 60 397,387

200W 112 337,712

CHPRC 86 218,517

MSA 4 9,286

Other 1 9,240

WRPS 21 100,669

300 Area 14 66,985

MSA 2 24,520

Other 3 5,544

WCH 9 36,921

400 Area 10 95,377

CHPRC 3 29,294

MSA 7 66,083

600 Area 29 241,620

CHPRC 2 3,232

MSA 8 35,522

WCH 16 195,914

WRPS 3 6,952

Richland 23 556,152

CHPRC 1 94,127

MSA 14 278,302

Other 2 31,955

WCH 3 62,118

WRPS 3 89,650

Total 364 2,339,082


A-2

Influencing Referenced Documents (see Section 1.7 of FMP)

The following briefly highlights key documents that influence the FMP.

2015 Vision Hanford Site Cleanup:

Hanford Site cleanup is performed in accordance with the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement

and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement or “TPA”), an agreement between DOE, the

Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA). It provides an agreed plan and schedule to clean up the Site in accordance with

the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and

Liability Act of 1980 and the Resource Conservation and

Recovery Act of 19764. The 2015 Vision Hanford Site Cleanup

(“2015 Vision) provides a roadmap for finishing cleanup

activities within the River Corridor by 2015. The work includes

cleanup of the 300 Area and the 100 Area. Accomplishing this

vision:

Reduces the active site footprint through cleanup from 586 to 75 mi2;

At completion, shifts emphasis and resources to full-scale cleanup of the Central Plateau

(75 mi2);

Significantly reduces long-term mortgage costs;

Reduces costs by “right sizing” Hanford’s infrastructure through a Mission Support

contract; and

Minimizes potential injury to natural resources.

Infrastructure and Services Alignment Plan:

The Infrastructure and Services Alignment Plan (ISAP) is MSA’s

strategic, high-level plan for providing infrastructure systems and

services for the Hanford lifecycle (HFN-44238 Revision 2,

Infrastructure and Services Alignment Plan [ISAP]) . It is not

intended to address daily operations or provide detailed

implementation plans but to establish the strategic foundation for

providing the infrastructure systems and services needed to support

Hanford missions in the near and long-term. The elements,

requirements, and current condition assessments, provide the

foundation for determining “right-sized” solutions to maintain the

required capacity of the infrastructure systems throughout the Hanford lifecycle.

The ISAP addresses near- and long-term requirements to support DOE’s 2015 and 2020 Visions,

and the Hanford lifecycle. The ISAP focuses on involving OHC and its DOE counterparts in

defining its infrastructure and service requirements, and documenting the current condition of the

infrastructure systems and the equipment and facilities associated with our major services.


A-3

The Forecast of Services and System Master Plans provide additional strategic and tactical

detail. These documents combined with their associated Project plans are the implementing

documents for the ISAP.

Central Plateau Area Management Plan:

HNF-49709, Central Plateau Area Management Plan (MSA

2011)(CPAMP) is an implementing document for DOE/EIS 0222 F,

1999, Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental

Impact Statement (HCLUP EIS) and is also considered a Master Plan

subordinate to the ISAP. This first phase of the CPAMP is focused on

assembling all the disparate sub-area master plans, then looking for

gaps and overlaps. Future revisions of the CPAMP will fill the gaps

and fix the overlaps, and help environmental organizations identify

where further National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

documentation is necessary.

Strategic Direction (see Section 1.7 of FMP)

The prime contracts, environmental decision documents, and resources listed in Section Error!

Reference source not found. provide valuable direction for out-year GPF planning. The

following listing contains a high level outline of strategy sources and assumptions affecting the

GPF planning in each of the geographical areas of the Hanford Site.

Ongoing Site funding reductions have resulted in personnel reductions, which in turn have

reduced facility occupancy rates in both government-owned and -leased space. Funding

reductions have also prompted contractors to carefully consider the merits of relocating staff

from the City of Richland locations, to underutilized facilities on the Central Plateau and then

terminating lease contracts for space in Richland.

WTP will start bringing operators on board for training by 2015. Many of the WTP operations

and support staff will require office accommodations. Between 2015 and 2019 (could slide up to

three years), up to 1,400 additional personnel will need office space, preferably in the southeast

corner of the 200 East Area.


A-4

Emerging Studies and Planning Informatino (see Section 1.8 of FMP)

Business Case Analysis for Warehouse Consolidation Pilot Project:

The Business Case Analysis for Warehouse Consolidation Pilot Project summarizes the results

of a collaborative process, with support from CHPRC, MSA, and WRPS, that recommends

changes to the current methods of storing Site materials and equipment. If implemented, an

estimated $521K annually could be saved by CHPRC and WRPS operations, and an estimated

$1M could be saved from WCH operations. The gross square footage (GSF) consumed

associated with these facilities is also displayed in Figure A-1, Appendix A.

The projected savings will be achieved through excessing or relocating unneeded material and

equipment to sufficiently eliminate leased spaced, such as 45,000 ft2 of Energy Northwest-leased

space currently used by CHPRC and WRPS.

Figure A-1. Resulting Change of Warehouse Consolidation Recommendation (Section 1.8.1).


A-5

Building 3790 Alternative Analysis:

DOE recently approved the Building 3790 Alternative Analysis (Letter CHPRC-1202718) to

vacate and transition the facility to WCH for decommissioning, thus avoiding major repair and

upgrade costs of up to $2.3 million. MSA is proceeding with actions to relocate the current

occupants to several locations in North Richland, and the Central Plateau (see Section Error!

Reference source not found.).

Hanford Fire Department Fire Station Realignment and Consolidation Plan:

The Hanford Fire Department Fire Station Realignment and Consolidation Plan (HNF-52686)

presents the general required activities, estimated costs, and a high-level schedule for the fire

station realignment and consolidation recommendations. As cleanup operations are completed,

active operations will shrink from the Site’s initial footprint down to ~75 mi2 centered on the

Central Plateau. This concentrated focus will require the Hanford Fire Department (HFD)

emergency response to hazardous materials events, technical rescue incidents, emergency

medical situations, and fire alarms to adapt to the changing work locations, conditions, and

worker population.

Timely emergency responses rely on fire station infrastructure and location. The realignment

and consolidation plan provides an approach to implement the study’s recommendations. The

plan activities follow baseline assumptions and recommendations included in HNF-51581

(Hanford Fire Department − Fire Station Infrastructure and Deployment Evaluation), plus an

alternative option and baseline schedule for an “Accelerated Closure Schedule”, which includes:

Design and Construct a Central Plateau East Fire Station and build a new 5-bay

equipment storage building at the current 200 Area Fire Station.

Renovate and upgrade the 200 Area Fire Station.

Closure of the 100, 300, and 400 Area Fire Stations.

2012 Hanford Site Sustainability Plan:

The purpose of the Hanford Site Sustainability Plan (MSA 2012, HSSP) is to promote economic,

environmental, and social sustainability for the Hanford Site, and support the long-term success

of its missions. The HSSP includes findings of the 2007 FMP. The seven overall goals are to:

1. Achieve measurable and verifiable energy, water, petroleum

fuel, and GHG emissions reductions.

2. Achieve responsible use and disposal of materials and

resources.

3. Achieve high-performance building design and operations.

4. Support cost-effective facilities, utilities, services, and

program management.


A-6

5. Explore potential use of onsite renewable energy.

6. Engage our employees so that they take personal responsibility for creating and using

sustainable practices and principles.

7. Support future sustainability projects such as energy initiative proposals that would

locate associated projects on the Hanford Site.

Water Systems Strategic Vision:

MSA is charged with supporting Site-wide footprint reduction, while

continuing to provide clean, reliable, and cost-effective water supplies

to the Site. To facilitate this responsibility, the Water System Strategic

Vision 2015 and Beyond (MSA 2012) was developed to offer

engineering solutions for the Site-wide water utility system throughout

the end of the cleanup mission. As cleanup progresses, water services

continually will be refocused to support needs in areas of new

construction, while other water service areas are closed because of

worker relocation, facility demolition, and responses to footprint

reduction.

Draft 300/400 Area Long-Term Electrical Service Study:

Another emerging study is the 300/400 Area Long-Term Electrical Service Study, currently

underway. This study evaluates and identifies the 300 Area and 400 Area current and long-term

electrical needs, keeping pace with the Hanford mission power requirements. While this study

does not identify utilization of specific GPFs, it assesses the condition of various substations and

their ability to meet long-term electrical need. The final report will discuss proposed upgrades

and replacements for each recommended option, define screening criteria, and explain

advantages and disadvantages, risks, lifecycle costs, and other information. The anticipated

publication date is early FY2013.

MSA Fleet Services Facility Out-Year Plan:

The Fleet Services Facility Out-Year Plan is a proposed engineering study that would evaluate

Fleet Services current and future customer base consistent with the Site Mission and out year

planning and determine when consolidation to the central plateau should be completed. This

engineering study is on hold, and the publication date is not known. When published, the plan

would include:

400 area demolition schedule which could affect fleet facilities in the 400 area.

Additional facilities required.

Provide potential facility options.

Provide ROM cost estimates for facility options.


A-7

Identify cost and service impacts to south area customers if all services move to the

central plateau

Define contractual conditions for make/buy alternatives

Hanford Telecommunications and Information Technology Facility Consolidation Study:

The Hanford Telecommunications and Information Technology Facility Consolidation Study,

will determine the feasibility of reducing the number of buildings owned and utilized by MSA,

and managed by (LMSI) to support the telecommunication and information technology

infrastructure across the Site. Twenty-three buildings across the site house Hanford’s

telecommunications and information technology core infrastructure. Consolidation plans include

relocating equipment to optimal facilities, demolishing facilities as vacated, and reducing the

number of buildings to 12 by FY2015. The draft study is anticipated to be published in

fall 2012.


A-8



B-i

APPENDIX B

SECTION 3.0 SUPPORT – LONG-TERM VISION


B-ii



B-1

APPENDIX B

SECTION 3.0 SUPPORT – LONG-TERM VISION

Installation costs for each new building category (office, warehouse, and shop) were estimated

from typical construction costs, within that specific category, as stated in R.S. Means Square

Foot Cost Database (2012).

Site work and utilities costs were based on 30% (as an allowance) of the building construction

costs. Adders were applied to the building, site work and utilities to reflect an average cost for an

MSA Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) subcontractor to perform the work. Adders include:

General Requirements (20%), OH&P (26.5%), Bond & Insurance (3%) and B&O tax (0.48%).

Additional MSA support cost where applied, based on the average BOAs estimated cost, to cover

Engineering/Design (10%), PM/CM/Contract Management (9%), Project Closeout (1%), Other

Project Costs (5%).

Table B-1. Contractor-Planned D&D Activities. (Section 3.1.4)

Year Planned D&D Offices Shop Warehouse

# of Fac. Gross ft2 # of Fac. Gross ft2 # of Fac. Gross ft2

CHPRC 18 44,484

2012 1 2,772

2014 3 6,696

2015 1 9,240

2016 5 7,560

2017 2 5,280

2018 6 12,936

MSA 2 20,648 1 20,866

2012 1 18,800

2013 1 1,848 1 20,866

WCH 12 53,393 1 12,000

2012 3 17,292 1 12,000

2013 8 13,452

2014 1 22,649

WRPS 1 1,344

2013 1 1,344

Total 33 119,869 1 20,866 1 12,000



B-2

Table B-2. Facilities at End-of-Life. (Section 3.2).

Projects Managed by Contractor

Project Mission End Dates

2015 2017 2020 2022 2040 2047 2048 2049 2050 N/A Total

CHPRC 9 0 6 1 7 36 6 10 9 9 11

CHPRC Landlord 8 4 1 5 36 6 9 4 3 8

Engineering, Projects & Construction

General Office Space

PFP Project 2

Sludge Treatment Project 1

Soil & Groundwater Remediation 1

Surveillance and Maintenance 1 1 2

Waste & Fuels 1 3 6 2

MSA 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0

General Office Space 1 7 1

General Shop Space 1 3

General Warehouse 1 3

Other 7 10 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


General Warehouse 7

VIT Plant 3 2 1

WCH 18 20 7 9 7 36 6 17 9 9 11

D&D End of Contract 1 1

ERDF End of Contract 17 19 7 9 7 36 6 17 9 9 11

WRPS 8 0 6 1 5 36 6 9 4 3 8

200E Tank Farms 8 4 1 5 36 6 9 4 3 8

200W Tank Farms

WTP Operations

Total 43 39 20 19 19 108 18 43 22 21 30


C-i

APPENDIX C

SECTION 4.0 SUPPORT – DATA ACQUISITION


C-ii

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


C-1

APPENDIX C

SECTION 4.0 SUPPORT – DATA ACQUISITION

Consolidating Existing Facility Databases (see Section 4.1)_

FIMS: The Facilities Information Management System (FIMS) is the "corporate" real property

database for the Department of Energy (fimsinfo.doe.gov). The DOE Headquarters (HQ)

utilizes FIMS as a tool that assist in managing corporate physical assets. FIMS is the DOE's

corporate real property database for real property as required by DOE O 430.1B, Real Property

Asset Management.

DOE CAS: Based on the Condition Assessment Survey (CAS) Program, Deficiency Standards

& Inspections Methods Manual, or “CAS Manual” (DOE 2011), CAS inspections provide DOE

with overall assessments of its facilities, and the surveys provide data used by Facility

Information FIMS to identify deferred maintenance costs. At the Hanford Site, a modified

Hanford-specific CAS is used to assess the current material condition of its facilities, structures,

systems and equipment by reporting maintenance deficiencies. Table C-1 in this Appendix

summarizes condition items of most concern to the Hanford Site.

Care-Taker: Care-Taker maintains the official site list for facilities and manages the office

space for MSA’s Occupancy Pool (www3.rl.gov/care/OUO.asp). CareTaker is used for

billing organizations for the space they occupy. Caretaker identifies specific facility information

such as Building Identification, Assigned Project, Location Address, Building Manager, and

Building Administrator, and several other information fields to adequately describe building

characteristics.

Site Structure List: Land and Facilities Management supports site cleanup for DOE by

maintaining a set of cleanup objects that should be scheduled and budgeted through their life-

cycle to final disposition. Monitoring the disposition of cleanup objects is one of the metrics for

determining cleanup progress.

The FMP data set was developed by integrating information four the key sources noted above

and serves as the baseline data for the Facility Master Plan.

HNF-53496 Revision 0

C-2

Table C-1. DOE Standard System Design Life Table. (Section 4.1)

System/ Component

Item Description

Hanfo

rd A

dju

ste

d L

ife

*

CA

S L

ifecycle

Woo

d-f

ram

e H

ouse

Dura

bili

ty &

Dis

aste

r Is

sues

Confe

rence,

266

4

US

DA

Fore

st

Serv

ice

Sta

te o

f W

isconsin

Cost m

ode

ling L

imite

d *

AT

D Insp

ectio

n

Chart

ere

d Institu

tion

of

Build

ing S

erv

ices

US

De

part

ment

of H

ousin

g

and U

rban D

evelo

pm

ent

Nationa

l A

ssocia

tion o

f

Hom

e B

uild

ers

Expected Life in Years

HVAC Central air 20 15 15 15 16 11.5 15 15 15

Window-mounted units 15 10 10 15 12.5 10

Forced air, heat pump (permanent facilities)

20 15 15 16 16

Forced air, heat pump (trailers) 15 12

Unit Heater, Electric 20 20 13 25 12 10

Roofing Asphalt shingle 20 20 15 20 30 22.5

Metal 50 50 20 40

Built-up roof (BUR)

(membrane)

20 20 12 15 30

Building Structure

Wood framed 65 50 51.6 69

Concrete (pre-cast) 90 75 87.2 81

Steel 90 75 77.3 83

CMU/masonry 90 75 77.5

Mobile trailer 30 30

Footnote:

* Adjusted for Hanford Conditions.


C-3

Data Calls & Workshops (see Section 4.2)

On May 8, 2012, MSA L&FM forwarded an introductory correspondence to facility

management representatives of each prime contractor to announce the 2012 Facility Master Plan

(FMP) project. The introduction was forwarded by email and included the following text:

Email Date: May 8, 2012 Subject: 2012 Facility Master Plan Introduction

Greetings Managers,

Mission Support Alliance - Land and Facilities Management (L&FM), working on behalf of

DOE-RL, is kicking off efforts to develop a site-wide facility master plan. The 2012 Facility

Master Plan (FMP) is intended to be a comprehensive facility planning tool which compares

site-wide general purpose facility assets with long term programmatic cleanup and operating

requirements. The FMP is a key element of the Mission Support Alliance’s Infrastructure

Services and Alignment Plan (ISAP). MSA will be interfacing with DOE contractors over the

next 5 months exchanging information and formulating recommendations.

Shortly, Facility Managers will receive correspondence requesting review of your organization’s

general purpose facilities. Accordingly, an EXCEL data set will be attached which contains

information for facilities assigned to each Facility Manager. In addition to the data set, a web-

link will be provided which links to a short facility questionnaire. The questionnaire was

designed to assess your program’s current and future general purpose facility needs. Facility

Managers will be asked to review the data set and complete the questionnaire. MSA L&FM will

compile the responses and review the information with the Facility Managers to ensure general

purpose facility current and future requirements will be fulfilled. If you have any questions,

please contact David Havens (FMP Project Lead) of my staff.

We appreciate you taking time out of your busy day.

Thank you in advance,

Clark Stolle,

Manager, MSA Land and Facility Management


C-4

On May 8, 2012, the FMP Team requested participation from the WRPS Facility Managers to

collaborate on building an accurate utilization database facilities. This request was forwarded as

an email, shown below.

Email Date: May 8, 2012 Subject: 2012 Facility Master Plan Data Call Announcement - WRPS Facilities

WRPS Facility Managers,

As announced earlier, Mission Support Alliance-Land and Facilities Management

(L&FM) is developing the 2012 Facility Master Plan (FMP). The FMP is intended to

be a comprehensive facility planning tool which compares site-wide general purpose

facility assets with long-term programmatic and operational cleanup requirements. As

part of the FMP data acquisition phase, MSA-L&FM needs your input to maintain

accurate facility information and to identify additional facility requirements.

You are receiving this email because you are one of the assigned Facility Managers

for DOE owned or leased facilities at the Hanford Site. MSA received feedback from

CHPRC, MSA, WCH and WRPS indicating that one Facility Manager will respond to

facility inquiries on behalf of their respective company. The Facility Manager

respondents are as follows:

• CHPRC: Rick Dahlin

• MSA: Clark Stolle – MSA General Occupancy Facilities

• LMSI: Roy Nearing – MSA IT Facilities

• MSA: Steve Shupe – MSA Shops

• MSA: John Horton/Jim Chandler-MSA Warehouses

• WCH: Connie Krull

• WRPS: Monte Farner/James Devere

Over the next couple weeks, Dave Havens, of my staff, will schedule one-on-one

workshops to assist with reviewing the attached data set and responding to the below

questionnaire as outlined in the following steps:

Step 1: Attached to this correspondence is a data set (Microsoft Excel format)

which includes general purpose facility information assigned to your company.

Please review the attached facility dataset, correct as appropriate, and bring any

noted changes to the upcoming scheduled workshop.

Step 2: A web-link is provided to access a facility questionnaire. Your answers to

the questionnaire are critical to assess existing facility’s effectiveness compared to

programmatic current and future clean-up requirements. Please click on the web-

link (http://msasp.rl.gov/sil/flm/SitePages/Facility%20Master%20Plan.aspx ) to

access and review the on-line facility questionnaire. L&FM will assist you with

the questionnaire responses during the upcoming scheduled workshop.


C-5

When complete, L&FM will compile the information. We will work with the

designated company representatives to address fulfilling your organization’s current

and future requirements. If you have any questions, please contact Dave Havens

(FMP Project Lead) of my staff. We appreciate you taking the time to support this

effort. Your input is vital for Hanford facility planning purposes.

Thank you again for your participation,

Clark Stolle,

Manager, MSA Land and Facility Management

Following these communications, workshops were held with facility managers and subject

matter experts (SMEs). The survey questions discussed and summarized in Section 4.2 were

reviewed during the workshops, although follow-up communications were requested to fill any

gaps in information. The complete set of questions asked during the workshops are included in

Table C-2 in this Appendix. Responses are summarizes in Table C-3.

After the workshops, MSA L&FM returned revised spreadsheets to the facility managers for

their review and editing. These review request emails were forwarded on June 11, 2012, MSA

L&FM. An example of that review request is presented below.

Email Date: June 11, 2012

Subject: Facility Master Plan - WRPS-Rev1 (6-5-2012) .xlsx

Monte and James,

Attached is the updated general purpose facility data set revised from our last workshop. There

are a few fields still to be completed as we discussed in the workshop. Specifically, we need

“Forecasted Vacate Date” [column O], “Current Utilization” [column S], plus the

contamination fields (Y/N response) of Asbestos [column V], Beryllium [column W] and Other

Contamination [column X] fields filled out. If you don’t have any contaminated facilities, just

state so on your reply and we will fill in those fields accordingly. We also don’t have any data

for MO-158. So if you can provide some “intel” on this trailer, that would be great. We are

planning to have the data back from all contractors by the end of the week where we will start

compiling the data. If you are interested, we’ll send you a copy of the compiled data set for your

use.

Thanks again for your participation, you’ve been great!

David Havens PMP, RCDD

Facility Master Plan Lead

MSA Land and Facility Management

509.376.9770 office

509.438.6055 cell


C-6

Table C-2. Online Automated Survey Questions. (Section 4.2)

Subject Matter Expert Survey Questions

1 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, is there an existing facility that does not meet your group’s current cleanup mission requirements?

1.1a. What is the Facility ID/Number that presently does not meet your group’s current clean-up requirement?

1.1b. Why doesn’t the identified facility meet your current clean-up requirement?

1.1b2. Please Explain

1.1c. What facility type would better meet your group’s current cleanup requirements, please select the new facility type.

1.1d. What area would this facility need to be located?

1.1e. What would be the size of the facility (square footage)?

1.1f. Briefly explain the facility configuration or condition changes that would better meet your group's clean-up requirements

1.2. Is there another existing facility that does not meet your group’s current cleanup requirements? Note: a. If the response entered is “yes”, the survey loops back around to the same questions as asked in 1.1a through 1.2, until the

response entered is “no”. b. If the response entered is “no”, then the user is transitioned to Question 2 of 10. c. If a “yes” response is entered more than four times, then the survey redirects the user to continue additional entries for Question 1

by clicking on the “Question 1” button on the survey home page.

2 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, are there additional facility requirements that are not being met by the assigned existing facilities?

2.1a. What type of facility would be required to meet your group’s additional facility requirements (current period of time)?

2.1b. How much additional space (square footage) is needed to meet the additional facility space noted above?

2.1c. What area would the additional space required to be located?

2.1d. What is the reason for the additional space? Note: Entering a response of “yes” cycles the user through Questions 2.1a through 2.1d for a total of 10 facility entries. The user is

then transitioned to Question 2.2.

2.2. Are there additional facility requirements beyond the above noted requirements that are not being met by your existing facilities?

3 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, are there forecasted facility requirements that are not currently being met by the existing assigned facilities?

3.1a. What year would the additional facility assets by required?

3.1b. What is the facility type that would be required?

3.1c. What is the size of the forecasted facility (in terms of square feet)?

3.1d. What area would the forecasted facility need to be located?

3.1e. What is the reason for the required space? Note: Entering a response of “yes” cycles the user through Questions 3.1a through 3.1e for a total of 10 facility entries. The user is

then transitioned to Question 3.10f.

3.10f. If there are additional forecasted facility requirements that are not currently being met by the existing assigned facilities, Please fill out the additional entries using the Question #1 Button on the introduction page.

4 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, are there facilities that are not currently being fully utilized?

4.1a. What is the Facility ID?

4.1b. What is the estimated percentage of the facility being underutilized (%)?

4.1c. Can the underutilized space be made available for other DOE contractors?

4.1d. What is the reason for the space availability?

4.1d. Are there other facilities that are not currently being fully utilized? Note: Entering a response of “yes” cycles the user through Questions 4.1a through 4.1d for a total of five facility entries. The user is

then transitioned to Question 4.5e.

4.5e. Are there other facilities that are not currently being fully utilized? If so please add them by clicking on the Additional Question 4 on the introduction page. Please complete this questionnaire first.

5 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, is there any facility that is forecasted not to be fully utilized in the future?

5.1a. What is the Facility ID?

5.1b. What is the estimated percentage of the forecasted underutilized (%)?

5.1c. How much space (in terms of square footage) will be available due to the forecasted changes?

5.1d. What year is the forecasted underutilized space expected to occur?

5.1e. What is the reason for the forecasted underutilization? Note: Entering a response of “yes” cycles the user through Questions 5.1a through 5.1e for a total of five facility entries. The user is

then transitioned to Question 5.5f.

5.5f. Is there another facility in addition to the facility noted above? If so please add them by clicking on the Additional Question 5 on the introduction page. Please complete this questionnaire first.


C-7

6 of 10. Do you have any existing facilities that have major deficiencies? A deficiency is defined as a single or combined set of elements that will cost at least $50K (total cost) to resolve, replace or initiate new action.

6.1a. Facility ID:

6.1b. Deficiency Description:

6.1c. Select the category that best applies to

6.1d. Graded Priority:

7 of 10. Do you have any facilities containing asbestos?

7.1a. Please enter the Facility ID:

7.5b. Do you have any facilities containing asbestos? Please fill out the additional entries using the Question #7 Button

8 of 10. Do you have any facilities containing Beryllium?

8.1a. Please enter the Facility ID containing Beryllium:

9 of 10. Do you have any facilities containing other contamination?

9.1a. Please enter the Facility ID containing other contamination:

9.1b. What other type of contamination (chemical, radiation, mold, etc.)?

9.5c. Do you have another facility containing other contamination? Please fill out the additional entries using the Question #9 Button

Table C-3. Responses to Online Automated Questionnaire. (Section 4.2)

Questions Facility Managers Ostrander

MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

1 of 10 When reviewing your assigned facilities, is there an existing facility that does not meet your group’s current cleanup mission requirements?

No No Yes Yes No

1.1a. What is the Facility ID/Number that presently does not meet your group’s current cleanup requirement?

- - MO315 639 CULLOM -

1.1b. Why doesn’t the identified facility meet your current clean-up requirement?

- - Facility too small

Consolidate One System engineers in one location

-

1.1b2. Please Explain - - - Relocate ~100 people to support One System WRPS engineering.

-

1.1c. What facility type would better meet your group’s current cleanup requirements, please select the new facility type.

- - - Office -

1.1d. What area would this facility need to be located?

- - - - -

1.1e. What would be the size of the facility (square footage)?

- - Unspecified. 22886 -

1.1f Briefly explain the facility configuration or condition changes that would better meet your group's clean-up requirements.

- - - - -

1.2 Is there another existing facility that does not meet your group’s current cleanup requirements?

No No No No No

2 of 10 When reviewing your assigned facilities, are there additional facility requirements that are not being met by the assigned existing facilities?

Yes No No Yes No

2.1a. What type of facility would be required to meet your group’s additional facility requirements

Warehouse - - Office -


C-8



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

(current period of time)?

2.1b. How much additional space (square footage) is needed to meet the additional facility space noted above?

5000 - - 37000 -

2.1c. What area would the additional space required to be located?

200E - - 200E -

2.1d. What is the reason for the additional space?

Need larger, permanent storage structure to protect materials and equipment (replace CONEX Boxes).

- - WTP-WRPS Trailer Village is needed for 2018 WTP commissioning for ~200 people. Trailer number/sizes is TBD (see Larry Walker).

-

2.2: Are there additional facility requirements beyond the above noted requirements that are not being met by your existing facilities?

Yes - - Yes -

2.2a What type of facility is required to meet additional group’s requirements?

Fenced Shop Complex Area

- - Office -

2.2b How much additional space (square footage) is needed to meet the additional facility space noted above?

0 - - 11088 -

2.2c What area would the additional space required to be located?

200E - - 200E -

2.2d What is the reason for the additional space?

Security fencing needed from 4th/Baltimore to 3rd/Atlanta.

- - One System needs mobile office complex on Buffalo Ave. to support AX/AY tank farms. Need six 2x trailers at Buffalo to move workers closer to field work: two 2x trailers in 2013; four 2x trailers in 2015. Relocate 2750E workers to these trailers (~1,848 sq ft total).

-

2.3 Are there additional facility requirements beyond the above noted requirements that are not being met by your existing facilities??

Yes - - Yes -


Garage - - Warehouse -


600 - - 10000 -


200E - - 200E -


Additional space is needed to store the Paint Stripe Machine.

- - 272AW needs a new facility with a concrete flooring system to support the storage of

-


C-9



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

80 to 100 file cabinets.

2.4 Are there additional facility requirements beyond the above noted requirements that are not being met by your existing facilities?

Yes - - No -


Gas Recovery Shelter

- - - -


800 - - - -


200E - - - -


More space needed for refrigerant gas recovery from excess equipment.

- - - -

2.5 Are there additional facility requirements beyond the above noted requirements that are not being met by your existing facilities?

No No No No No

3 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, are there forecasted facility requirements that are not currently being met by the existing assigned facilities?

No No No No No

4 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, are there facilities that are not currently being fully utilized?

No No No No Yes

4.1 Are there any facilities that are not currently being fully utilized?

- - - - Yes

4.1a What is the Facility ID? - - - - 1713H

4.1b What is the estimated percentage of the facility being under utilization (%)?

- - - - 40

4.1c Can the underutilized space be made available for other DOE contractors?

- - - - Yes

4.1d What is the reason for the space availability?

- - - - S&GW is using for storage, needs <100% of facility.

4.2 Are there other facilities that are not currently being fully utilized?

- - - - Yes

4.2a What is the Facility ID? - - - - 440

4.2b What is the estimated percentage of the facility being under utilization(%)?

- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - Temporary waste storage use only. To be made available at end of contract in 2018.

4.3 Are there other facilities that are - - - - Yes


C-10



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

not currently being fully utilized?

4.3a What is the Facility ID? - - - - 4732B


- - - - 30


- - - - Yes


- - - - Building has electrical deficiencies. Site rock samples are stored here. Contamination has been confirmed.


- - - - Yes

4.4a What is the Facility ID? - - - - MO029


- - - - 100


- - - - No


- - - - End of Life FY2012. Can be made ready for D4.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - End of life 2016.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Available through end of contract.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes

4.7d What is the reason for the - - - - End of life 2017. Has


C-11



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

space availability? leaking and mold issues.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - Candidate for consolidation and re-use at end of PFP Mission, 2017.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



C-12



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC


- - - - 40


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - At WRAP. Startup processing TBD. End of contract.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


C-13



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC


- - - - End of contract 2018, will transfer to Waste & Fuels.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - End of contract, will go back to Waste and Fuels.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - End of contract 2018.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Available to end of contract. CHPRC consolidation candidate, X-ARRA facilities may be available in FY2013.


- - - - Yes


4.21b What is the estimated percentage of the facility being

- - - - 50


C-14



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

under utilization (%)?


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes


C-15



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Available to end of contract. CHPRC consolidation candidate, X-ARRA facilities may be


C-16



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

available in FY2013.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - End of Life. Don't know when facility will be used again, when Burial Ground retrieval starts. Rick to validate.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Candidate for consolidation and re-use at end of PFP Mission.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 30


- - - - Yes


- - - - Will be used beyond end of contract.


- - - - Yes



C-17



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC


- - - - 30


- - - - Yes


- - - - Candidate for consolidation and re-use at end of PFP Mission.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 70


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - Available through end of contract. MSA.


- - - - Yes



C-18



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC


- - - - 90


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 80


- - - - Yes


- - - - Short-term availability. Scheduled for D4 in FY2014.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 90


- - - - Yes


- - - - Occupancy/use will follow B-Plant schedule. Unoccupied currently. Used for some storage.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - Available for transfer now for re-use.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - TBD.

4.43 Are there any facilities that are - - - - Yes


C-19



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC




- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - D4 at end of project in 2014.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 30


- - - - Yes


- - - - Use past end of contract. 100-K Area D4.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 60


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 10


- - - - Yes


- - - - Used for storing cannisters.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Use through end of contract.


- - - - Yes


C-20



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC



- - - - 90


- - - - Yes


- - - - Use through end of contract.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - Will follow T-Plan schedule.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Available through end of FY2013.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes


4.53b What is the estimated - - - - 50


C-21



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

percentage of the facility being under utilization (%)?


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - WRPS transfer.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Potentially available for use beyond end of contract.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


C-22



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC



- - - - Yes


- - - - Potentially available for use beyond end of contract.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - End of life 2016.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 90


- - - - Yes


- - - - D4 at end of project, 2017.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - Facility will be used beyond end of contract. Connected to sewer.

4.81 Are there any facilities that are - - - - Yes


C-23



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC




- - - - 50


- - - - Yes


- - - - Facility is available through end of contract. CHPRC consolidation candidate. X-ARRA facilities may be available by FY2012.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 80


- - - - No


- - - - At end of life.


- - - - Yes

4.83a What is the Facility ID? - - - - 2713W


- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - Being transferred to S&M


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


C-24



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC



- - - - Yes


- - - - Facility is available through end of contract. CHPRC consolidation candidate. X-ARRA facilities may be available by FY2012.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 80


- - - - Yes


- - - - Occupancy/use will follow T-Plant schedule, >2018.


- - - - Yes

4.87a What is the Facility ID? - - - - 2420STVCN


- - - - 40


- - - - Yes


- - - - First floor available for reutilization through end of contract.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 100

4.89c Can the underutilized space - - - - Yes


C-25



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

be made available for other DOE contractors?


- - - - Candidate for re-use.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - Will transfer to WRPS in 2012/


- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 50


- - - - Yes




- - - - Yes



- - - - 100


- - - - Yes


- - - - Candidate for re-use.


- - - - Yes



- - - - 90


C-26



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC



- - - - Yes


- - - - Occupancy/use will follow B-Plant schedule. Unoccupied currently. Used for some storage.


No No No No No

5 of 10. When reviewing your assigned facilities, is there any facility that is forecasted not to be fully utilized in the future?

No Yes No Yes No

5.1a. What is the Facility ID? - Most WCH Facilities - MO636 -

5.1b. What is the estimated percentage of the forecasted under utilization (%)?

- 100 - 100 -

5.1c. How much space (in terms of square footage) will be available due to the forecasted changes?

- N/A - 672 -

5.1d. What year is the forecasted underutilized space expected to occur?

- 2013 - 2012 -

5.1e. What is the reason for the forecasted under utilization?

- Most WCH facilities are anticipated to be demolished and removed in FY2012 or FY2013. These facilities have no future value.

- The building is vacant. MO636 will be relocated to 200E or 200W, near 732/733. Funding is needed.

-

5.2 Is there another facility in addition to the facility noted above?

- Yes - Yes -

5.2a What is the Facility ID? - 6251 - 639 Cullum -

5.2b What is the estimated percentage of the forecasted under utilization (%)?

- 100 - 100 -

5.2c How much space (in terms of square footage) will be available due to the forecasted changes?

- N/A - 18097 -

5.2d What year is the forecasted underutilized space expected to occur?

- 2015 - 2012 -

5.2e What is the reason for the forecasted under utilization?

- Near-term demolition is not scheduled. In 2015, all ERDF facilities will be transferred with scope of work to CHPRC.

- To be vacated at the end of FY2012. Personnel will be moved to PONA, 2425 Stevens.

-


- Yes - Yes -

5.3a What is the Facility ID? - 6260 - MO407


- 100 - 100

5.3c How much space (in terms of - N/A - 4620


C-27



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

square footage) will be available due to the forecasted changes?


- 2015 - 2013



- Being transferred from CHPRC to WRPS.


- Yes - Yes

5.4a What is the Facility ID? - 6618D - MO037 -


- 100 - 100 -


- N/A - 5544 -


- 2015 - 2013 -



- Will be vacated by FY2013.

-


- Yes - Yes -

5.5a What is the Facility ID? - MO607 - MO409 -


- 100 - 100 -


- N/A - 3696 -


- 2015 - 2012 -


- Near-term demolition is not scheduled. Facility will transfer to PRC in 2015.

- Already vacated. -


- Yes - Yes -



- 100 - 100 -


- N/A - 1,344 -


- 2015 - 2013 -


C-28



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC



- To be vacated in FY2013.

-


- Yes - Yes -



- 100 - 100 -


- N/A - 1,344 -


- 2015 - 2012 -



- Being swapped for a trailer from PRC's Trailer Fleet.

-


- Yes - Yes -

5.8a What is the Facility ID? - MO096 - Many WRPS Facilities -


- 100 - 100 -


- N/A - N/A -


- 2015 - 2013 -


- Near-term demolition is not scheduled. Leased month-to-month.

- Many WRPS facilities are anticipated to be demolished and removed in FY2012 or FY2013. These facilities have no future value.

-


- Yes - No -

5.9a What is the Facility ID? - MO6114 - - -


- 100 - - -


- N/A - - -


- 2014 - - -


- Utilized at 618-10 Burial Ground. Scheduled for demolition/removal in FY2014.

- - -

5.10 Is there another facility in - Yes - - -


C-29



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

addition to the facility noted above?

5.10a What is the Facility ID? - 2620FERMI - - -


- 100 - - -


- N/A - - -


- 2014 - - -


- In first of three, 1-year lease options.

- - -


- Yes - - -

5.11a What is the Facility ID? - 1812TD - - -


- 100 - - -


- N/A - - -


- 2014 - - -


- In first of three, 1-year lease options.

- - -


- Yes - - -

5.12a What is the Facility ID? - 1060 - - -


- 100 - - -


- N/A - - -


- 2015 - - -


- Actual disposition date is TBD. First of three, 1-yr lease options. PNNL leases 2/3 of the facility.

- - -


- Yes - - -

5.13a What is the Facility ID? - 6250 - - -


- 100 - - -


- 13718 - - -


- 2015 - - -

5.13e What is the reason for the - All ERDF facilities will - - -


C-30



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

forecasted under utilization? transfer with work scope to DOE in 2015.


No No No No No

6 of 10. Do you have any existing facilities that have major deficiencies? A deficiency is defined as a single or combined set of elements that will cost at least $50K (total cost) to resolve, replace or initiate new action.

Yes No No Yes No

6.1a. Facility ID: 274E - - 2750E -

6.1b. Deficiency Description: ACM siding requires periodic maintenance. Needs appropriate future D&D management.

- - Needs new plumbing (reliability project).

-

6.1c. Select the category that best applies to

Industrial Safety - - Infrastructure -

6.1d. Graded Priority: Medium - Problem is serious but can be managed with administrative controls

- - Medium - Problem is serious but can be managed with administrative controls.

-

6.2 Is there another facility with major deficiencies in addition to the one noted above?

Yes - - Yes -

6.2a Facility ID: 2719EA - - MO-493 -

6.2b Deficiency Description: Needs new roof, AC system, and siding.

- - Remodel & replace current 4-x trailer (2,880 ft2).

-

6.2c Select the category that best applies to

Infrastructure - - Infrastructure -

6.2d Graded Priority Medium - Problem is serious but can be managed with administrative controls

- - Medium-Problem is serious but can be managed with administrative controls.

-

6.3 Is there another facility with major deficiencies in addition to the one noted above?

Yes - - Yes -

6.3a Facility ID: 2715EF - - 9 unidentified 2x trailer. -

6.3b Deficiency Description: Shop space is not insulated. Portable heaters are required in winter. No cooling system is installed for summer facility use.

- - Nine 2-wide trailers will be completely renovated and reset their current construction date and lifecycle upon completion. The nine trailers are unidentified.

-

6.3c Select the category that best applies to

Infrastructure - - Infrastructure -

6.3d Graded Priority: Low - Problem is a concern but is not serious

- - Medium - Problem is serious but can be managed with administrative controls

-

6.4 Is there another facility with No - - Yes -


C-31



MSA Krull WCH

Horton MSA

Farner WRPS

Dahlin CHPRC

major deficiencies in addition to the one noted above?

6.4a Facility ID: - - - MO493 -

6.4b Deficiency Description: - - - Will be remodeled for $1.2M.

-

6.4c Does the deficiency create a Safety or Operational Productivity Impact?

- - - Infrastructure -

6.4d Graded Priority: - - - Medium - Problem is serious but can be managed with administrative controls.

-

7 of 10. Do you have any facilities containing asbestos?

Yes No No Yes No

7.1a. Please enter the Facility ID: 274E 2750E

7.2 Do you have any facilities containing asbestos?

No No No No No

8 of 10. Do you have any facilities containing Beryllium?

No No No No No

9 of 10. Do you have any facilities containing other contamination?

No No No No No


C-32

Section 4.3 – Field Tours - Condition Assessment Surveys

Field Tour 1: WRPS General Purpose Facilities

Date: August 10, 2012

Host: James Devere

FMP Team Attendees: Cal Rinne and Dave Havens

Cal Rinne and Dave Havens met with James Devere to perform a walk-down a sampling of

WRPS general purpose facilities. These facilities represented a mixture of general purpose

facilities which are of interest to the FMP Project Team and subject to facility analysis in the

Facility Master Plan. The FMP Team requested WRPS facilitate a field tour in order to gain an

overall perspective of WRPS facilities. It was requested that the tour include the following

facilities:

Facilities Visited:

The FMP Team reviewed facilities noting condition and utilization. Below are notes taken from

the facility tour:

2750E: WRPS Office Building

• Constructed: 1980.

• Size: 100,333 ft2.

• Facility Type: Office

• General Description:

2-Story Building.

Concrete structure with metal

support framing.

4 Large Wings containing cubicles and permanent office space.

• Long-term plans: Long-term office space used for duration of Tank Operations Contract.

• August 10, 2012 Utilization:

A-Wing 100%

B-Wing 100%

C-Wing 100%

D-Wing 60% (under renovation)

Utilization Notes: Three quarters of 2750E have been renovated. WRPS currently is

completing renovations to the D-Wing 2nd floor- South. When complete, WRPS will

consolidate ~ 25 engineering staff from 274AW and several older trailers, for better

use and more efficient centralized operations.


C-33

Recently Renovated Trailers: Two in FY11; seven trailers renovated in FY12; and one

planned in FY13)

• Constructed: ~1990.

• Size: Between 1,848 and 2,880 ft2.

• Facility Type: Offices.

• AW-Farms (MO282, MO283,MO 284, and MO511) plus C-Farms trailers (MO525 and

MO531 in FY11) are complete.

• MO266, MO267, and MO493 are being renovated.

• Long-term Plans: Plans to utilize for 200E SST and DST Retrieval programs through

2047.

• August 10th Utilization: 100% where renovations are complete. WRPS is shuffling

workers to accommodate renovation activities. Trailers MO-266, 267 and 493 will return

to 100% utilization following renovations.

Forecasted FY13 Planned Renovations:

• 274AW FY13:

Construction Date: 1990s

Size: Between 1,848– 9,240 ft2

Facility Type: Offices

Long-term Plans: Long-term plans to utilize trailers for 200E SST and DST Retrieval

projects through 2047

August 10th Utilization: 100 %


C-34

• C-Farm Facilities: C-Farm Facilities previously were used by construction staff. These

include MO377 (D&D begun in 2009, but not completed), MO919, MO272, and MO421

(D&D to ERDF).

Constructed: ~1974.

Size: Between 924 and 1344 ft2.

Facility Type: Office.

Long-term Plans: These facilities are past end-of-life and are no longer economical

to repair. WRPS plans to offer these trailers to MSA but MSA isn’t expected to

accept them. Instead, WRPS anticipates gaining authorization transfer these trailers

to ERDF for disposal.

August 10, 2012, Utilization: 100%, occupants will be relocated in October 2012.

• New Trailers: One new triple-wide and one new double-wide trailer (200 East Tank

Farms) are being set up for use by American Electric Incorporated, which will provide

electrical support for 200 East Tank Farms upcoming projects.


C-35

• 2704HV: This facility was not visited but

was reported. Renovated by replacing

carpet and ceiling (tile and lighting)

Constructed: 1994.

Size: 126,679 ft2.

Facility Type: Office/Shop.

Long-term Plans: Long-term plans are

to support Tank Farms Operations through the cleanup mission end date.

August 10, 2012, Utilization (reported): 100 %.

200 West Tank Farms: These were not visited but reported. Facilities in the 200 West

Area, reported to be long-term facilities, were constructed or renovated with ARRA funds

last year. The facilities are:

222S – renovated with ARRA funds.

2713S – constructed with ARRA funds.

2705S – constructed with ARRA funds.

277S – storage facility constructed with ARRA funds.


C-36

Field Tour 2: CHPRC Unsecured Core Area

Date: June 12, 2012

Host: Rick Dahlin

FMP Team Attendees: Cal Rinne and Dave Havens

Cal Rinne and Dave Havens visited the 200E Unsecured Core Area where Rick Dahlin hosted a

walk-through of CHPRC facilities. These facilities were constructed during 2010-2011 with

American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) funding. The buildings serve CHPRC as the

centralized location for Soil and Groundwater Remediation Project and Engineering, Projects

and Construction operations supporting the Central Plateau. 35 structures were added during

ARRA in the Unsecured Core Area and directly west of MO285 below the core area. The four

shop/storage buildings were selected for review due to the permanent nature of the facilities and

their potential for beneficial reuse. Other facilities were randomly selected for the field visit to

show examples of the range of structures throughout the core area. Rick noted that the CHPRC is

in the middle of major consolidation efforts and planning for the compression of occupancy

following the most current round of Workforce Restructuring scheduled for September 2012.

Therefore, this report reflects utilization status both at the time of the June 12, 2012 field visit

and a follow update based upon field reports dated August 6, 2012 as well as CHPRC’s

projections for continued utilization. All current plans for utilization of these facilities hinge on

an overall company occupancy master plan that will not be completed until mid October 2012.

Since the initial walkthrough, several facilities in the Unsecured Core have been transferred to

the Sludge Treatment Project at 100K and redeployed to other Hanford Contractors.

Facilities Visited:

The FMP Team reviewed facilities noting condition and utilization. Below are notes taken from

the facility tour:

2269E: EPC Shop for Building Trades workers

Constructed in 2011

15,450 ft2

Warehouse Shop

Large Storage Rooms

Large Craft Shops

Long-term Warehouse Storage

June 6, 2012, Utilization: ~66%

August 6, 2012, Utilization: 66%

Utilization Notes - 1/3 of 2269E is a dedicated lunch room/all employees meeting

area that has served up to 250 Building Trades craft and EPC employees depending

on fluctuations in Construction activities.


C-37

Utilization Projection – CHPRC is in process of converting the lunch room/all

employees meeting area into dedicated warehousing space to support vacating leased

space at Energy Northwest.

2610E: Engineering Projects and Construction (EPC) Heavy Assembly Shop for

Construction

Constructed in 2011

15,450 ft2

Large High Bay Area

Large Shop Rooms

June 6, 2012, Utilization: 100%

August 6, 2012, Utilization:

100%

Utilization Notes – 2610E

provides shop space for general construction fabrication and shared space with other

CHPRC Projects requiring shop space.

Utilization Projections – CHPRC intends to retain 2610E throughout the duration of

the CHPRC contract.

2611E: Soil & Groundwater Warehouse

Constructed in 2011

15,450 ft2

Warehouse Shop

Large Storage Rooms

Long-term Warehouse Storage

Exempted from Warehouse

Study



Utilization Notes – Full utilization has been achieved following the consolidation and

relocation of outside storage into the 2611E lay down yard.

Utilization Projection – This facility will remain with the Soils and Groundwater

Remediation Project for the duration of its mission.

2268E: Soil and Groundwater Shop

Constructed in 2011

15,450 ft2

Large High Bay Area

Large Shop Rooms


C-38

June 6th Utilization: 100%

August 6th Utilization: 100%

Utilization Notes – 2268E

maintains a 300 person

capacity meeting area that is

used for all employee

meetings and the CHPRC

PZAC. CHPRC anticipates a

new occupant on the first floor of 2420 Stevens in RCHN in FY13 which would

eliminate the only other large conference space available and divert all large scale

meetings to 2268E.

Utilization Projection - This facility will remain with the Soils and Groundwater


MO2215: Office Trailer - W of MO285

Acquired in 2011

Office Space

5W Trailer

3,600 ft2



100%

Utilization Notes – MO2215,

2216 and the two adjoining

restrooms facilities were occupied by the Soil and Groundwater Remediation Project

in October of 2011, consolidating occupants from MO285 and MO277. This

consolidation resulted in vacating MO285 for transfer to the MSA.



MO2216: Office Trailer - W of MO285

Acquired in 2010

Office Space

5W Trailer

3,600 ft2



Utilization Notes – MO2215,

2216 and the two adjoining


C-39

restrooms facilities were occupied by the Soil and Groundwater Remediation Project

in October of 2011, consolidating occupants from MO285 and MO277. This

consolidation resulted in vacating MO285 for transfer to the MSA.



MO2332: Restroom Trailer - SW of MO285

Acquired in 2010

Restroom

360 ft2

June 6th Utilization: In

service/fully utilized

August 6th Utilization:

In-service/fully utilized

MO2232: Exempt Office Trailer - SW of MO285

Acquired in 2010

5W Trailer

Office Space

3,600 ft2

June 6th Utilization: 12%


Utilization Notes – Facility serves

as current HQ for EPC operations.

Utilization Projection - This

facility is a candidate for consolidation of other groups within the Unsecured Core or

for transfer to 300 Area in CY13 based on an inquiry from DOE-RL

MO2233: Exempt Office Trailer - SW of MO285

Acquired in 2010

5W Trailer

Office Space

3,600 ft2

Consolidation candidate

June 6t, 2012, Utilization: 21%


Utilization Notes – Facility

serves as current HQ for EPC

operations.


C-40

Utilization Projection - This facility is a candidate for consolidation of other groups

within the Unsecured Core or for transfer to 300 Area in CY13 based on an inquiry

from DOE-RL

MO2234: Engineering Projects and Construction Trailer - SW of MO285

Acquired in 2010

2W Trailer

Office Space

1,792 ft2

June 6, 2012, Utilization:

100%


100%

Utilization Notes – Facility

serves as a dedicated

conference/Meeting/POD for EPC operations.


or reutilization pending final configuration and utilization of MO2232/2233.

MO285: Mobile Office - W of

2753E

Acquired in 1993

12W Trailer

Office Space

11,088 ft2

Plans to vacate and

consolidate current occupants

into MO2215 and MO2216

Transfer candidate, plans to

transfer to MSA

June 6, 2012, Utilization: <50%

August 6th Utilization: Vacant, Pending transfer to MSA.


C-41

MO2220: Mobile Office – E of 2269E

Acquired in 2010

4W Trailer

2,880 ft2

Only office in UCA that contains

restrooms.

If available, would backfill with

Groundwater people

June 6, 2012, Utilization:

7 people; 33%

August 6, 2012, Utilization: 7 people; 33%

Utilization Notes – Currently occupied by FFS Construction Execution.


or reutilization pending changes in the structure and staffing of EPC.


C-i



D-i

APPENDIX D

SECTION 5.0 SUPPORT – FACILITY ANALYSIS CRITERIA


D-ii



D-1

APPENDIX D

SECTION 5.0 SUPPORT – FACILITY ANALYSIS CRITERIA

Table D-1. Facilities at End-of-Life. (Section 5.2.2)

Projects Managed by Contractor

Project Mission End Dates

2015 2017 2020 2022 2040 2047 2048 2049 2050 N/A Total

CHPRC 9 0 6 1 7 36 6 10 9 9 11

CHPRC Landlord 8 4 1 5 36 6 9 4 3 8

Engineering, Projects & Construction

General Office Space

PFP Project 2

Sludge Treatment Project 1

Soil & Groundwater Remediation 1

Surveillance and Maintenance 1 1 2

Waste & Fuels 1 3 6 2

MSA 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0


General Shop Space 1 3

General Warehouse 1 3

Other 7 10 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


General Warehouse 7

VIT Plant 3 2 1

WCH 18 20 7 9 7 36 6 17 9 9 11

D&D End of Contract 1 1

ERDF End of Contract 17 19 7 9 7 36 6 17 9 9 11

WRPS 8 0 6 1 5 36 6 9 4 3 8

200E Tank Farms 8 4 1 5 36 6 9 4 3 8

200W Tank Farms

WTP Operations

Total 43 39 20 19 19 108 18 43 22 21 30


D-2

Table D-2. Site-Wide Potential Facility Transfer Candidates. (Section 5.4)

Year Fac. Is Available

Offices Shop Storage/Warehouse

# of Fac. ft2 # of Fac. ft2 # of Fac. ft2

Early Release 43 96,832 5 23,833 5 48,364

2012 5 25,872

MO234 1 9,240

MO408 1 2,772

MO409 1 3,696

MO410 1 2,772

MO413 1 7,392

2013 6 10,488

MO1101 1 1,440

MO1103 1 1,440

MO1112 1 2,880

MO2218 1 1,440

MO2219 1 1,440

MO253 1 1,848

2014 3 4,320

MO2151 1 1,440

MO2221 1 1,440

MO2231 1 1,440

2016 2 5,294

440 1 1,254

4713C 1 4,040

2018 29 56,152 1 2,160

MO2101 1 1,792

MO2102 1 1,792

MO2103 1 1,440

MO2104 1 1,792

MO2105 1 1,792

MO2106 1 1,440

MO2107 1 1,440

MO2108 1 1,440

MO2109 1 1,440

MO2110 1 1,440

MO2111 1 1,440

MO2112 1 1,792

MO2113 1 1,440

MO2114 1 1,792

MO2115 1 1,792

MO2116 1 1,440

MO2117 1 1,792

MO2118 1 1,440

MO2119 1 1,440

MO2120 1 1,440

MO2121 1 1,440

MO2122 1 1,792


D-3

Table D-2. Site-Wide Potential Facility Transfer Candidates. (Section 5.4)

Year Fac. Is Available


# of Fac. ft2 # of Fac. ft2 # of Fac. ft2

MO2123 1 1,792

MO2124 1 2,160

MO2220 1 2,880

MO247 1 1,848

MO248 1 1,848

MO249 1 1,848

MO250 1 1,848

MO273 1 9,240

2020 4 21,673 3 43,070

272B 1 1,788

4704N 1 8,070

4722C 1 4,080

4732A 1 15,000

4732C 1 20,000

4734B 1 7,713

4734C 1 8,092

Consolidation 7 26,308

2012 1 4,620

MO407 1 4,620

2013 6 21,688

MO2232 1 3,600

MO235 1 1,848

MO252 1 1,848

MO285 1 11,088

MO290 1 1,848

MO388 1 1,456

Grand Total 50 123,140 5 23,833 5 48,364


D-4

This Page Left Intentionally Blank.


E-i

APPENDIX E

SECTION 6.1 SUPPORT - CHPRC PROFILE


E-ii

This Page Left Intentionally Blank.


E-1

APPENDIX E

SECTION 6.1 SUPPORT - CHPRC PROFILE

Table E-1. CHPRC Facility Supply/Demand Projection. (Section 6.1.2)

Office Shop Warehouse Office Shop Warehouse Office Shop Warehouse

Year # of Fac Gross ft2 # of Fac Gross ft2 # of Fac Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2 Gross ft2

2012 145 508,699 14 55,190 13 91,877 8,440 3,990 560 31,008 4,350 $1,383,517,620 0.000244 337,921 486,131 50,840 91,877

2013 0 48,892 1,296 $1,268,041,999 0.000244 309,716 437,239 49,544 91,877

2014 11,016 $1,085,129,128 0.000244 265,040 426,223 49,544 91,877

2015 25,146 35,748 9,240 $1,041,395,313 0.000244 254,358 442,129 49,544 91,877

2016 28,456 1,440 5,294 $997,661,498 0.000244 243,677 413,673 48,104 86,583

2017 5,280 $953,927,683 0.000244 232,995 408,393 48,104 86,583

2018 71,152 2,160 $910,193,868 0.000244 222,313 337,241 45,944 86,583

2019 $910,193,868 0.000244 222,313 337,241 45,944 86,583

2020 6,520 3,228 $895,525,630 0.000244 218,730 330,721 42,716 86,583

2025 10,164 861 2,037 $3,918,522,931 0.000244 191,418 320,557 41,855 84,546

2030 $2,393,156,308 0.000244 116,905 320,557 41,855 84,546

2035 24,000 $2,074,076,990 0.000244 101,318 320,557 41,855 60,546

2040 30,992 5,145 6,420 $2,200,638,619 0.000244 107,500 289,565 36,710 54,126

2045 $2,200,638,619 0.000244 107,500 289,565 36,710 54,126

2050 33,264 3,360 $1,401,874,640 0.000244 68,481 256,301 33,350 54,126

Budget Ratio Projected ft2

170,778

Office Shop Warehouse

Current Unutilized Office Space

Current Facilities Planned Future Facility Acquisition Forecasted Release of Facilities Forecasted Future SF Demand Available Facilities


E-2

Table E-2. CHPRC Current and Future End-of-Life Facilities. (Section 6.1.3)

End of Facility

Lifecycle


# of Fac.

Gross ft2

Forecasted Release Date

# of Fac.

Gross ft2


# of Fac.

Gross ft2

Forecasted Release

Date

2004 -- -- -- 1 1,296 -- -- -- --

MO354 -- -- -- -- 1,296 2013 -- -- --

2006 1 1,344 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO906 -- 1,344 2036 -- -- -- -- -- --

2007 1 624 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO223 -- 624 2018 -- -- -- -- -- --

2009 1 1,848 -- 1 4,350 -- -- -- --

2713W -- -- -- -- 4,350 2012 -- -- --

MO369 -- 1,848 2036 -- -- -- -- -- --

2010 1 1,344 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO892 -- 1,344 2036 -- -- -- -- -- --

2011 1 4,620 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO400 -- 4,620 2021 -- -- -- -- -- --

2015 1 1,848 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO232 -- 1,848 2021 -- -- -- -- -- --

2020 2 3,696 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO251 -- 1,848 2021 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO254 -- 1,848 2037 -- -- -- -- -- --

2022 4 46,200 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO277 -- 14,784 2050 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO281 -- 14,784 2047 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO720 -- 14,784 2047 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO723 -- 1,848 2051 -- -- -- -- -- --

2023 6 27,216 -- 1 3,360 -- -- -- --

MO285 -- 11,088 2050 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO287 -- 11,088 2036 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO433 -- 1,848 2036 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO434 -- 1,848 2037 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO444 -- 672 2035 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO446 -- 672 2035 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO743 -- -- -- -- 3,360 2047 -- -- --

2024 2 3,696 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO437 -- 1,848 2047 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO438 -- 1,848 2047 -- -- -- -- -- --

2026 1 14,784 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO294 -- 14,784 2050 -- -- -- -- -- --

2037 1 1,792 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MO645 -- 1,792 2050 -- -- -- -- -- --

2038 2 3,584 -- -- -- -- -- -- --


E-3

Table E-2. CHPRC Current and Future End-of-Life Facilities. (Section 6.1.3)

End of Facility

Lifecycle


# of Fac.

Gross ft2


# of Fac.

Gross ft2


# of Fac.

Gross ft2

Forecasted Release

Date

MO2210 -- 1,792 2050 -- -- -- -- -- --

MO644 -- 1,792 2050 -- -- -- -- -- --

2039 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 13,674 --

1713H -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,674 2050

Total 24 112,596 -- 3 9,006 -- 1 13,674 --

Table E-3. CHPRC Roof Replacement List. (Section 6.1.4)

Facility ID Roof Type Roof SF Roof Replacement

Cost

Roof Installation

Date

Roof Replacement

Date

Building Roof Age

(years)

High Risk $988,837

1713H Membrane 13,674 $89,523 1949 1969 63

2704Z Membrane 3,924 $33,678 1949 1969 63

MO015 Composite Shingle 672 $18,662 1976 1996 36

MO016 Membrane 672 $18,662 1976 1996 36

MO017 Membrane 672 $18,662 1976 1996 36

MO906 Membrane 1,344 $22,325 1976 1996 36

MO014 Membrane 924 $20,036 1977 1997 35

MO031 Membrane 2,772 $30,107 1978 1998 34

MO032 Membrane 2,772 $30,107 1978 1998 34

MO223 Membrane 624 $18,401 1978 1998 34

MO939 Membrane 672 $18,662 1978 1998 34

MO369 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1979 1999 33

MO892 Membrane 1,344 $22,325 1980 2000 32

MO400 Membrane 4,620 $40,179 1981 2001 31

MO232 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1985 2005 27

MO247 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO248 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO249 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO250 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO251 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO254 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO264 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO273 Membrane 9,240 $65,358 1990 2010 22

MO269 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1991 2011 21

MO277 Membrane 14,784 $95,573 1992 2012 20


E-4



Cost

Roof Installation

Date

Roof Replacement

Date

Building Roof Age

(years)

MO428 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1992 2012 20

MO429 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1992 2012 20

MO433 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1992 2012 20

MO720 Membrane 14,784 $95,573 1992 2012 20

MO723 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1992 2012 20

At Risk $536,960

278WA Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1993 2013 19

MO287 Membrane 11,088 $75,430 1993 2013 19

MO432 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1993 2013 19

MO434 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1993 2013 19

MO444 Membrane 672 $18,662 1993 2013 19

MO446 Membrane 672 $18,662 1993 2013 19

MO743 Membrane 3,360 $33,312 1993 2013 19

MO970 Membrane 3,360 $33,312 1993 2013 19

MO971 Membrane 3,360 $33,312 1993 2013 19

MO285 Membrane 11,088 $75,430 1994 2014 18

MO437 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1994 2014 18

MO438 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1994 2014 18

272B Metal 1,788 $27,909 1965 2015 47

MO294 Membrane 14,784 $95,573 1995 2015 17

Low Risk $3,208,598

2120WB Membrane 2,700 $29,715 1996 2016 16

2727W Metal 2,352 $31,981 1968 2018 44

2740W Membrane 11,088 $75,430 1998 2018 14

MO2123 Composite Shingle 1,792 $23,530 1998 2018 14

272BB Metal 861 $21,216 1970 2020 42


272BA Metal 986 $22,119 1971 2021 41









2753E Membrane 14,982 $96,652 2003 2023 9




E-5



Cost

Roof Installation

Date

Roof Replacement

Date

Building Roof Age

(years)










































E-6



Cost

Roof Installation

Date

Roof Replacement

Date

Building Roof Age

(years)


MO2160 Membrane 1,440 $21,854 2010 2030 2







273W Metal 6,000 $58,320 1981 2031 31

MO148 Membrane 1,848 $23,796 2011 2031 1

2715T Metal 602 $19,346 1982 2032 30

MO054 Metal 3,696 $41,685 1982 2032 30


4732B Metal 24,000 $173,280 1983 2033 29

4713C Metal 4,040 $44,169 1984 2034 28

211BA Metal 1,008 $22,278 1991 2041 21

242AL11 Metal 1,200 $23,664 1991 2041 21

440 Metal 1,254 $24,054 1992 2042 20

MO281 Metal 14,784 $106,740 1992 2042 20

2701HV Metal 2,160 $30,595 1993 2043 19

MO442 Metal 1,848 $28,343 1994 2044 18

2025EA Metal 10,250 $89,005 1995 2045 17

MO293 Metal 9,240 $81,713 1995 2045 17

2620W Metal 4,065 $44,349 1996 2046 16

MO500 Metal 14,784 $106,740 1999 2049 13

272HV Metal 3,668 $41,483 2001 2051 11

2405W Metal 3,720 $41,858 2010 2060 2

2611E Metal 15,450 $111,549 2010 2060 2

2268E Metal 15,450 $111,549 2011 2061 1

2269E Metal 15,450 $111,549 2011 2061 1

2610E Metal 15,450 $111,549 2011 2061 1

293W Metal 1,080 $22,798 2011 2061 1

Total 474,610 $4,734,396

Footnote: List Excludes Facilities Identified With a Release Date of 2012 and 2013


E-7

Table E-4. CHPRC HVAC Replacement List. (Section 6.1.4)

Facility ID

HVAC Type Gross SF HVAC Size (BTU)

HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age

High Risk $3,750,468

1713H Unit Heaters, Electric 13,674 120 $43,707 1949 1969 63

2704Z Forced Air, Heat Pump 3,924 10 $77,359 1949 1969 63

272B Unit Heaters, Electric 1,788 16 $18,754 1960 1980 52

2715T Unit Heaters, Electric 602 5 $16,264 1965 1985 47

272BB Wall Mount HVAC 861 2 $20,635 1970 1985 42

2727W Unit Heaters, Electric 2,352 21 $19,938 1968 1988 44

MO015 Forced Air, Heat Pump 672 2 $25,679 1976 1991 36



MO906 Forced Air, Heat Pump 1,344 3 $36,358 1976 1991 36








272BA Wall Mount HVAC 986 2 $21,453 1982 1997 30



4732B Unit Heaters, Electric 24,000 211 $65,385 1983 2003 29

4713C Unit Heaters, Electric 4,040 36 $23,482 1984 2004 28





E-8


Facility ID


HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age






211BA Wall Mount HVAC 1,051 3 $21,878 1991 2006 21

2753E Forced Air, Heat Pump 14,982 37 $238,089 1986 2006 26





















E-9


Facility ID


HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age




242AL11 Unit Heaters, Electric 1,200 11 $17,519 1991 2011 21

At Risk $572,888

2701HV Forced Air, Heat Pump 2,160 5 $49,326 1993 2013 19

278WA Forced Air, Heat Pump 1,848 5 $44,368 1993 2013 19



2025EA Forced Air, Heat Pump 10,250 26 $162,890 1995 2015 17


Low Risk $4,063,562

2620W Forced Air, Heat Pump 4,065 10 $79,600 1996 2016 16















E-10


Facility ID


HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age







272HV Forced Air, Heat Pump 3,668 9 $73,291 2001 2021 11





















E-11


Facility ID


HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age












293W Wall Mount HVAC 1,080 3 $22,068 2010 2025 2
















E-12


Facility ID


HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age





Total 464,699 1,462 $8,386,918 Footnote: List Excludes Facilities Identified With a Release Date of 2012 and 2013


E-13

Table E-5. CHPRC Potential Facility Transfer Candidate. (Section 6.1.7)

Year Fac. Is Available Offices Shop Storage/Warehouse


Early Release

2012 4 22,176

MO234 1 9,240

MO408 1 2,772

MO410 1 2,772

MO413 1 7,392

2013 5 8,640

MO1101 1 1,440

MO1103 1 1,440

MO1112 1 2,880

MO2218 1 1,440

MO2219 1 1,440

2014 3 4,320

MO2151 1 1,440

MO2221 1 1,440

MO2231 1 1,440

2016 2 5,294

440 1 1,254

4713C 1 4,040

2018 29 56,152 1 2,160

MO2101 1 1,792

MO2102 1 1,792

MO2103 1 1,440

MO2104 1 1,792

MO2105 1 1,792

MO2106 1 1,440

MO2107 1 1,440

MO2108 1 1,440

MO2109 1 1,440

MO2110 1 1,440

MO2111 1 1,440

MO2112 1 1,792

MO2113 1 1,440

MO2114 1 1,792

MO2115 1 1,792

MO2116 1 1,440

MO2117 1 1,792

MO2118 1 1,440

MO2119 1 1,440

MO2120 1 1,440


E-14

Table E-5. CHPRC Potential Facility Transfer Candidate. (Section 6.1.7)

MO2121 1 1,440

MO2122 1 1,792

MO2123 1 1,792

MO2124 1 2,160

MO2220 1 2,880

MO247 1 1,848

MO248 1 1,848

MO249 1 1,848

MO250 1 1,848

MO273 1 9,240

2020 1 1,788

272B 1 1,788

Consolidation

2012 1 4,620

MO407 1 4,620

2013 2 14,688

MO2232 1 3,600

MO285 1 11,088

Total 44 110,596 2 3,948 2 5,294

Table E-6. CHPRC Current Facility Utilization. (Section 6.1.9)

Fac. ID by Utilization

Range


# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

50% or Less 24 80,554 1 1,680 2 12,193

440 1 1,254 0%

1713H 1 10,939 20%

MO2220 1 1,930 33%

MO2221 1 1,008 30%

MO2222 1 1,008 30%

MO2223 1 1,008 30%

MO2224 1 1,008 30%

MO2225 1 1,008 30%

MO2226 1 1,008 30%

MO2227 1 1,008 30%

MO2228 1 1,008 30%

MO2229 1 1,008 30%

MO223 1 312 50%

MO2233 1 2,844 21%

MO247 1 1,848 0%

MO248 1 1,848 0%


E-15



Range


# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

MO277 1 7,392 50%

MO278 1 6,468 30%

MO281 1 7,392 50%

MO285 1 11,088 0%

MO287 1 9,979 10%

MO294 1 7,392 50%

MO369 1 1,478 20%

MO720 1 8,870 40%

MO743 1 1,680 50%

MO760 1 1,296 10%

MO892 1 1,344 0%

50% - 90% 7 4,064 2 5,829 1 7,200

2269E 1 5,253 66%

4732B 1 7,200 70%

MO2159 1 717 60%

MO2160 1 576 60%

MO2161 1 576 60%

MO2162 1 576 60%

MO2210 1 717 60%

MO254 1 554 70%

MO438 1 739 60%

MO723 1 185 90%

90% - 100% 46 0 9 0 10 0

2025EA 1 0 100%

211BA 1 0 100%

2120WB 1 0 100%

2268E 1 0 100%

2405W 1 0 100%

242AL11 1 0 100%

2610E 1 0 100%

2611E 1 0 100%

2620W 1 0 100%

2701HV 1 0 100%

2704Z 1 0 100%

2715T 1 0 100%

2727W 1 0 100%

272B 1 0 100%

272BA 1 0 100%

272BB 1 0 100%

272HV 1 0 100%


E-16



Range


# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

273W 1 0 100%

2740W 1 0 100%

2753E 1 0 100%

278WA 1 0 100%

293W 1 0 100%

4713C 1 0 100%

MO014 1 0 100%

MO015 1 0 100%

MO016 1 0 100%

MO017 1 0 100%

MO1113 1 0 100%

MO1114 1 0 100%

MO1115 1 0 100%

MO1116 1 0 100%

MO1123 1 0 100%

MO148 1 0 100%

MO2100 1 0 100%

MO2124 1 0 100%

MO2151 1 0 100%

MO2211 1 0 100%

MO2212 1 0 100%

MO2213 1 0 100%

MO2214 1 0 100%

MO2215 1 0 100%

MO2216 1 0 100%

MO2231 1 0 100%

MO2234 1 0 100%

MO232 1 0 100%

MO250 1 0 100%

MO251 1 0 100%

MO264 1 0 100%

MO269 1 0 100%

MO400 1 0 100%

MO428 1 0 100%

MO429 1 0 100%

MO432 1 0 100%

MO433 1 0 100%

MO434 1 0 100%

MO437 1 0 100%

MO444 1 0 100%


E-17



Range


# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

MO446 1 0 100%

MO6110 1 0 100%

MO644 1 0 100%

MO645 1 0 100%

MO906 1 0 100%

MO939 1 0 100%

MO970 1 0 100%

MO971 1 0 100%

Grand Total 77 84,618 12 7,509 13 19,393


E-18



F-i

APPENDIX F

SECTION 6.2 SUPPORT - MSA PROFILE


F-ii



F-1

APPENDIX F

SECTION 6.2 SUPPORT - MSA PROFILE

Table F-1. MSA Supply/demand Projections. (Section 6.1.1)

Office Shop Warehouse Office Shop Warehouse Office Shop Warehouse

Year # of Fac Gross ft2 # of Fac Gross ft

2 # of Fac Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

2012 31 369,009 18 128,186 10 207,747 16,900 5,000 18,800 $121,723,443 0.00271 330,168 350,209 128,186 207,747

2013 18,088 24,856 560 $124,523,393 0.00271 337,763 332,121 103,330 207,187

2014 $140,708,437 0.00271 381,664 332,121 103,330 207,187

2015 $128,691,930 0.00271 349,070 332,121 103,330 207,187

2016 17,600 4,080 $124,493,472 0.00271 337,682 332,121 99,250 207,187

2017 $120,295,014 0.00271 326,293 332,121 99,250 207,187

2018 $116,096,556 0.00271 314,905 332,121 99,250 207,187

2019 $111,898,098 0.00271 303,517 332,121 99,250 207,187

2020 6,000 500 6,000 3,128 19,885 43,070 $107,699,640 0.00271 292,129 334,993 79,365 164,117

2025 $538,498,201 0.00271 292,129 334,993 79,365 164,117

2030 $532,451,767 0.00271 288,849 334,993 79,365 164,117

2035 $380,631,608 0.00271 206,488 334,993 79,365 164,117

2040 $246,843,516 0.00271 133,910 334,993 79,365 164,117

2045 $246,843,516 0.00271 133,910 334,993 79,365 164,117

2050 $243,420,979 0.00271 132,053 334,993 79,365 164,117

Office Shop Warehouse Budget Ratio Projected ft2

Current Unutilized Office Space

38,841

Current Facilities Planned Future Facility Acquisition Forecasted Release of Facilities Forecasted Future SF Demand Available Facilities


F-2

Table F-2. MSA Current and Future End-of-Life Facilities. (Section 6.2.3)

End of Facility

Lifecycle Offices Shop Warehouse

# of Fac.

Gross ft

2

Forecasted Release

Date

# of Fac.

Gross ft

2

Forecasted Release

Date

# of Fac.

Gross ft

2

Forecasted Release

Date

2005 1 560 2013

MO315 1 560 2013

2009 2 7,802 4063

274E 1 3,812 2050

275W 1 3,990 2013

2011 1 3,128 2020

4707 1 3,128 2020

2013 1 11,088 2050

MO414 1 11,088 2050

2020 2 3,696 4100

MO256 1 1,848 2050

MO257 1 1,848 2050

2021 1 1,848 2050

MO722 1 1,848 2050

2022 1 14,784 2050

MO276 1 14,784 2050

2023 2 20,328 4100

MO280 1 9,240 2050

MO286 1 11,088 2050

2024 1 9,240 2050

MO292 1 9,240 2050

2026 1 1,742 2050

6293 1 1,742 2050

2043 1 33,128 2050 1 33,128 2050 1 96,000 2050

2101M Office 1 33,128 2050

2101M Warehouse

1 96,000 2050

2101M Shop 1 33,128 2050

Grand Total 10 97,134 20470 4 42,778 8163 2 96,560 4063


F-3

Table F-3. MSA Roof Replacement List. (Section 6.2.4)

Facility ID Roof Type

Roof SF Roof Replacement

Cost

Roof Installation

Date

Roof Replacement

Date

Building's Roof Age

High Risk $850,105

275W 3,990 $36,746 1936 1956 76

4707 3,128 $29,889 1946 1966 66

274E 3,812 $35,775 1946 1966 66

712 10,433 $71,860 1949 1969 63

MO315 560 $18,052 1975 1995 37

3790 18,000 $113,100 1981 2001 31

2719EA 1,885 $25,273 1981 2001 31

622F 3,200 $38,104 1951 2001 61

2751E 14,982 $96,652 1984 2004 28

MO414 11,088 $75,430 1984 2004 28

MO235 1,848 $25,072 1986 2006 26

MO388 1,456 $22,935 1986 2006 26

MO252 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO253 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO257 1,848 $25,072 1990 2010 22

MO276 14,784 $95,573 1992 2012 20

MO280 9,240 $65,358 1992 2012 20

MO722 1,848 $25,072 1992 2012 20

At Risk $1,094,848

712B 1,848 $25,072 1993 2013 19

MO256 1,848 $25,072 1993 2013 19

MO290 1,848 $25,072 1993 2013 19

2101M 161,256 $878,845 1994 2014 18

MO286 11,088 $75,430 1994 2014 18

MO292 9,240 $65,358 1994 2014 18

Low Risk $1,229,611

6293 1,742 $24,494 1996 2016 16

4732C 20,000 $144,400 1971 2021 41

4734B 7,713 $70,688 1971 2021 41

4734C 8,092 $73,424 1971 2021 41

4704N 8,070 $73,265 1973 2023 39

4722C 4,080 $44,458 1975 2025 37

4732A 15,000 $108,300 1975 2025 37

3220 5,720 $46,174 2009 2029 3

2724WB 1,600 $26,552 1979 2029 33

2230E 1,447 $25,447 1980 2030 32

2715ED 600 $19,332 1980 2030 32


F-4

Table F-3. MSA Roof Replacement List. (Section 6.2.4)

Facility ID Roof Type

Roof SF Roof Replacement

Cost

Roof Installation

Date

Roof Replacement

Date

Building's Roof Age

273E 6,000 $58,320 1981 2031 31

2715EC 1,021 $22,372 1982 2032 30

2721EA 3,767 $42,198 1984 2034 28

2711E 7,110 $66,334 1985 2035 27

6290 8,660 $77,525 1989 2039 23

2711EA 4,443 $47,078 1991 2041 21

2711EB 4,494 $47,447 1995 2045 17

275E-BA 458 $18,307 1997 2047 15

2266E 26,800 $193,496 2006 2056 6

Total $4,932,254 Footnote: List Excludes Facilities Identified With a Release Date of 2012 and 2013


F-5

Table F-4. MSA HVAC Replacement List. (Section 6.2.4)

Facility ID HVAC Type Gross SF HVAC Size

(BTU)

HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age

High Risk 232,677 924 $2,569,597

4707 Forced Air, Heat Pump 3,128 8 $64,709 1946 1966 66

4734B Forced Air, Heat Pump 7,713 19 $122,572 1971 1991 41


4704N Unit Heaters, Electric 8,070 71 $31,942 1973 1993 39

4722C Forced Air, Heat Pump 4,080 10 $79,838 1975 1995 37

4732A Unit Heaters, Electric 15,000 132 $46,491 1978 1998 34

2724WB Unit Heaters, Electric 1,600 14 $18,359 1979 1999 33


2715ED Unit Heaters, Electric 600 5 $16,260 1980 2000 32

2719EA Forced Air, Heat Pump 1,885 5 $44,956 1981 2001 31

2101M - Office Central HVAC 33,128 83 $232,477 1982 2002 30

2101M - Shop Central HVAC 33,128 83 $232,477 1982 2002 30


622F Forced Air, Heat Pump 3,200 8 $65,853 1982 2002 30

2715EC Unit Heaters, Electric 1,021 9 $17,143 1983 2003 29






MO722 Forced Air, Heat Pump 1,848 4.62 $44,368 1992 2007 20







F-6

Table F-4. MSA HVAC Replacement List. (Section 6.2.4)

Facility ID HVAC Type Gross SF HVAC Size

(BTU)

HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age

At Risk 106,214 294 $1,655,936


2711EB Unit Heaters, Electric 4,494 40 $24,435 1993 2013 19

2101M - Warehouse Forced Air, Heat Pump 96,000 240 $1,525,601 1994 2014 18

Low Risk 47,412 151 $684,902


2711EA Unit Heaters, Electric 4,582 40 $24,619 1996 2016 16

2721EA Wall Mount HVAC 7,638 19 $64,988 2002 2017 10

275E-BA Unit Heaters, Electric 650 6 $16,365 2010 2025 2



Grand Total 391,562 1,379 $4,986,014

Footnote: List Excludes Facilities Identified With a Release Date of 2012 and 2013


F-7

Table F-5. MSA Potential Facility Transfer Candidates. (Section 6.2.6)

Year Fac. Is Available Offices Shop Warehouse


Early Release 2 4,976 3 19,885 3 43,070

2013 1 1,848

MO253 1 1,848

2020 3 19,885 3 43,070

4704N 1 8,070

4722C 1 4,080

4732A 1 15,000

4732C 1 20,000

4734B 1 7,713

4734C 1 8,092

Consolidation 4 7,000

2013 4 7,000

MO235 1 1,848

MO252 1 1,848

MO290 1 1,848

MO388 1 1,456

Total 5 8,848 3 19,885 3 43,070

Table F-6. MSA Current Facility Utilization. (Section 6.2.8)


Range


# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized # of

Fac. ft

2 %

Utilized # of Fac.

ft2 %

Utilized

50% or Less 1 7,263

4704N 1 7,263 10%

50% - 90% 1 313

4707 1 313 90%

90% - 100% 11 0 9 0 7 0

3220 1 0 95%

6290 1 0 100%

6293 1 0 100%

2101M - Office 1 0 100%

2101M - Shop 1 0 100%

2101M - Warehouse 1 0 100%

2230E 1 0 100%

2266E 1 0 100% 0

2715EC 1 0 100%

2715ED 1 0 100%

2719EA 1 0 100%


F-8

Table F-6. MSA Current Facility Utilization. (Section 6.2.8)


Range


# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized # of

Fac. ft

2 %

Utilized # of Fac.

ft2 %

Utilized

2724WB 1 0 100%

274E 1 0 100%

2751E 1 0 96%

275E-BA 1 0 100%

4722C 1 0 100%

4732A 1 0 100%

4732C 1 0 100%

4734B 1 0 100%

4734C 1 0 100%

622F 1 0 100%

MO256 1 0 100%

MO257 1 0 100%

MO276 1 0 93%

MO292 1 0 100%

MO414 1 0 93%

MO722 1 0 100%

More Than 100% 5 7,552

2711E 1 1,481 120%

2711EA 1 916 120%

2711EB 1 899 120%

2721EA 1 3,055 140%

273E 1 1,200 120%

Total 12 3,009 14 7,552 8 7,263


G-i

APPENDIX G

SECTION 6.3 SUPPORT - WRPS PROFILE


G-ii



G-1

APPENDIX G

SECTION 6.3 SUPPORT - WRPS PROFILE

Table G-1. WRPS Supply/Demand Projections. (6.3.2)

Office Shop Storage/Warehouse Office Shop Storage/Warehouse Office Shop Storage/Warehouse

Year # of Fac Gross ft2 # of Fac Gross ft

2 # of Fac Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

Gross ft2

2012 72 527,616 8 25,522 7 41,520 10,000 5,760 $484,920,000 0.00109 527,616 521,856 25,522 41,520 508,676

2013 3,690 26,425 $516,390,000 0.00109 561,857 499,121 25,522 41,520 504,980

2014 $666,600,000 0.00109 725,292 499,121 25,522 41,520 504,980

2015 7,380 1,848 $841,030,000 0.00109 915,081 504,653 25,522 41,520 504,980

2016 $1,087,680,000 0.00109 1,183,448 504,653 25,522 41,520 504,980

2017 $1,316,060,000 0.00109 1,431,936 504,653 25,522 41,520 504,980

2018 140,000 $1,417,350,000 0.00109 1,542,144 644,653 25,522 41,520 504,980

2019 100,000 $1,693,070,000 0.00109 1,842,141 744,653 25,522 41,520 504,980

2020 $1,279,230,000 0.00109 1,391,863 744,653 25,522 41,520 504,980

2025 $6,812,540,000 0.00109 1,482,473 744,653 25,522 41,520 482,180

2030 $8,016,880,000 0.00109 1,744,549 744,653 25,522 41,520 480,116

2035 $9,417,880,000 0.00109 2,049,420 744,653 25,522 41,520 479,192

2040 $10,666,050,000 0.00109 2,321,034 744,653 25,522 41,520 432,872

2045 $8,780,350,000 0.00109 1,910,688 744,653 25,522 41,520 414,686

2050 $3,028,410,000 0.00109 659,011 744,653 25,522 41,520 414,686

Available Facilities

Office Shop Storage/Warehouse

Forecasted Future SF DemandCurrent Facilities Planned Future Facility Acquisition Forecasted Release of Facilities

Budget Ratio Projected ft2


G-2

Table G-2. WRPS Current and Future End of Life Facilities. (Section 6.3.3)

End of Facility Lifecycle

Offices Shop Warehouse

# of Fac.

Gross ft2 Forecasted

Release Date

# of Fac.

Gross ft2

Forecasted Release

Date

# of Fac

.

Gross ft2

Forecasted Release

Date

2004 1 1,344

MO919 1 1,344 2012

2007 1 720

MO211 1 720 2012

2008 1 1,848

MO027 1 1,848 2047

2009 3 15,532

2704S 1 8,140 2047

MO037 1 5,544 2013

MO041 1 1,848 2015

2021 1 2,880

MO850 1 2,880 2049

2022 3 5,136

MO724 1 1,848 2049

MO725 1 1,848 2049

MO733 1 1,440 2049

2023 3 5,544

MO732 1 1,848 2049

MO734 1 1,848 2049

MO979 1 1,848 2049

2024 1 9,240

MO291 1 9,240 2047

2027 2 1,392

MO633 1 720 2049

MO636 1 672 2047

2030 1 672

MO637 1 672 2049

2034 1 6,384

2713WB 1 6,384 2047

2035 1 924

MO575 1 924 2049

2039 10 23,040

MO2241 1 1,440 2049

MO2242 1 1,440 2049

MO588 1 3,600 2049

MO589 1 3,600 2049

MO590 1 3,600 2049

MO591 1 3,600 2049


G-3

Table G-2. WRPS Current and Future End of Life Facilities. (Section 6.3.3)

End of Facility Lifecycle

Offices Shop Warehouse

# of Fac.

Gross ft2 Forecasted

Release Date

# of Fac.

Gross ft2

Forecasted Release

Date

# of Fac

.

Gross ft2

Forecasted Release

Date

MO592 1 1,440 2049

MO593 1 1,440 2049

MO594 1 1,440 2049

MO595 1 1,440 2049

2040 12 23,280

MO149 1 1,440 2049

MO150 1 1,440 2049

MO151 1 1,440 2049

MO2240 1 1,440 2049

MO2243 1 1,440 2049

MO533 1 960 2049

MO577 1 3,600 2049

MO578 1 1,440 2049

MO596 1 3,600 2049

MO597 1 3,600 2049

MO598 1 1,440 2049

MO599 1 1,440 2049

2042 10 16,320

MO266 1 1,848 2049

MO267 1 1,848 2049

MO282 1 1,848 2049

MO283 1 1,848 2049

MO284 1 1,848 2049

MO493 1 2,880 2049

MO511 1 1,680 2049

MO524 1 924 2049

MO525 1 924 2049

MO531 1 672 2049

2043 1 1,848

MO268 1 1,848 2049

Grand Total 50 107,872 2 8,232


G-4

Table G-3. WRPS Roof Replacement List. (Section 6.3.4)

Facility ID Roof Type Roof ft2 Roof Replacement Cost

Roof Installation Date

Roof Replacement Date

Building's Roof Age

High Risk 67,968 $468,445

2704S Composite Shingle 8,140 $53,746 1949 1969 63

2713WB Metal 6,384 $61,092 1944 1994 68

MO027 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1978 1998 34

MO041 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1979 1999 33

2750E Membrane 33,446 $182,281 1980 2000 32

2752E Membrane 14,982 $96,652 1985 2005 27

2707SX Metal 1,320 $24,530 1960 2010 52

At Risk 130,538 $741,432

MO979 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1993 2013 19

2704HV Membrane 126,842 $691,289 1994 2014 18

278AW Membrane 1,848 $25,072 1994 2014 18

Low Risk 219,353 $2,270,511

2727WA Metal 2,400 $32,328 1968 2018 44

672 Composite Shingle 2,005 $24,544 2002 2022 10

674 Composite Shingle 947 $19,508 2002 2022 10

2716S Metal 1,720 $27,418 1972 2022 40

272S Metal 8,600 $77,092 1975 2025 37

MO575 Membrane 924 $20,036 2005 2025 7

MO637 Membrane 672 $18,662 2005 2025 7



MO588 Membrane 3,600 $34,620 2009 2029 3

MO589 Membrane 3,600 $34,620 2009 2029 3

MO590 Membrane 3,600 $34,620 2009 2029 3

MO591 Membrane 3,600 $34,620 2009 2029 3


G-5





Building's Roof Age





242AC Metal 960 $21,931 1980 2030 32










MO597 Membrane 3,600 $34,620 2010 2030 2



274AW Membrane 9,240 $65,358 2011 2031 1


MO524 Membrane 924 $20,036 2011 2031 1


MO636 Membrane 672 $18,662 2011 2031 1

MO724 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2011 2031 1

MO725 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2011 2031 1

MO732 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2011 2031 1

MO733 Membrane 1,440 $22,848 2011 2031 1

MO734 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2011 2031 1


G-6





Building's Roof Age

MO850 Membrane 2,880 $30,696 2011 2031 1

MO266 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2012 2032 0

MO268 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2012 2032 0

MO282 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2012 2032 0

MO283 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2012 2032 0

MO284 Membrane 1,848 $25,072 2012 2032 0

MO291 Membrane 9,240 $65,358 2012 2032 0

MO511 Membrane 1,680 $24,156 2012 2032 0


272WA Metal 15,541 $112,206 1985 2035 27

277A Metal 3,200 $38,104 1994 2044 18

2101HV #N/A 15,000 $108,300 1996 2046 16

2715AW Metal 2,400 $32,328 1996 2046 16

2715WA Metal 2,400 $32,328 1996 2046 16

MO633 Metal 720 $20,198 1997 2047 15

TC272HV Metal 810 $20,848 1999 2049 13

611 Metal 4,000 $43,880 2003 2053 9

2705S Metal 2,880 $35,794 2009 2059 3

218A Metal 10,000 $87,200 2011 2061 1

227S Metal 6,000 $58,320 2011 2061 1

2713S Metal 17,600 $127,072 2011 2061 1

272AW Metal 25,222 $182,103 2011 2061 1

MO267 Metal 1,848 $28,343 2012 2062 0

Total 417,859 $3,480,388


G-7

Table G-4. WRPS HVAC Replacement List. (Section 6.3.4)

Facility ID HVAC Type Gross ft2 HVAC Size (BTU)

HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age

High Risk 105,035 318 $1,656,544

2713WB Unit Heaters, Electric 6,384 56 $28,402 1944 1964 68

2707SX Forced Air, Heat Pump 1,320 3 $35,977 1960 1980 52

2727WA Unit Heaters, Electric 2,400 21 $20,039 1968 1988 44

2716S Forced Air, Heat Pump 1,720 4 $42,334 1972 1992 40


MO041 Forced Air, Heat Pump 1,848 5 $44,368 1,979 1,994 33


242AC Forced Air, Heat Pump 960 2 $30,256 1980 2000 32

272AW Forced Air, Heat Pump 25,222 63 $400,820 1980 2000 32










2101HV Wall Mount HVAC 15,000 38 $113,170 1996 2011 16



At Risk 150,080 375 $2,422,451


2704HV Forced Air, Heat Pump 126,842 317 $2,015,732 1994 2014 18


277A Forced Air, Heat Pump 3,200 8 $65,853 1994 2014 18


G-8



HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age


TC272HV Wall Mount HVAC 810 2 $20,301 1999 2014 13

Low Risk 229,637 599 $4,196,555



672 Wall Mount HVAC 2,005 5 $28,122 2002 2017 10

674 Wall Mount HVAC 947 2 $21,198 2002 2017 10



611 Unit Heaters, Electric 4,000 35 $23,398 2003 2023 9



















G-9



HVAC Replacement

Cost

HVAC Installation

Date

HVAC Replacement

Date

HVAC Age


















218A Forced Air, Heat Pump 10,000 25 $158,917 2011 2031 1



2750E Forced Air, Heat Pump 100,339 251 $1,594,555 2011 2031 1


Total 484,752 1,292 $8,275,551


G-10

Table G-5. Potential Facility Transfer Candidate List. (Section 6.3.6)

Year Fac. Is Available Offices Shop Warehouse

# of Fac. Gross SF # of Fac. Gross SF # of Fac. Gross SF

Early Release 1 3,696

2012 1 3,696

MO409 1 3,696

Total 1 3,696

Table G-6. WRPS Current Utilization. (Section 6.3.8)

Fac. ID by Utilization Range


# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

50% or Less 1 672 1 3,192

2713WB 1 3,192 50%

MO636 1 672 0%

90% - 100% 57 24,933 7 0 7 0

611 1 0 100%

672 1 0 100%

674 1 0 100%

2101HV 1 0 100%

218A 1 0 100%

227S 1 0 100%

242AC 1 0 100%

2704HV 1 8,879 93%

2704S 1 0 100%

2705S 1 0 100%

2707SX 1 0 100%

2713S 1 0 100%

2715AW 1 0 100%

2715WA 1 0 100%

2716S 1 0 100%

2727WA 1 0 100%

272AW 1 0 100%

272S 1 0 100%

272WA 1 0 100%

274AW 1 0 100%

2750E 1 16,054 84%

2752E 1 0 100%

277A 1 0 100%

278AW 1 0 100%


G-11




# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

MO027 1 0 100%

MO041 1 0 100%

MO149 1 0 100%

MO150 1 0 100%

MO151 1 0 100%

MO2240 1 0 100%

MO2241 1 0 100%

MO2242 1 0 100%

MO2243 1 0 100%

MO266 1 0 100%

MO267 1 0 100%

MO268 1 0 100%

MO282 1 0 100%

MO283 1 0 100%

MO284 1 0 100%

MO291 1 0 100%

MO493 1 0 100%

MO511 1 0 100%

MO524 1 0 100%

MO525 1 0 100%

MO531 1 0 100%

MO533 1 0 100%

MO575 1 0 100%

MO577 1 0 100%

MO578 1 0 100%

MO588 1 0 100%

MO589 1 0 100%

MO590 1 0 100%

MO591 1 0 100%

MO592 1 0 100%

MO593 1 0 100%

MO594 1 0 100%

MO595 1 0 100%

MO596 1 0 100%

MO597 1 0 100%

MO598 1 0 100%

MO599 1 0 100%

MO633 1 0 100%

MO637 1 0 100%

MO724 1 0 100%


G-12




# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

# of Fac.

ft2 % Utilized

MO725 1 0 100%

MO732 1 0 100%

MO733 1 0 100%

MO734 1 0 100%

MO850 1 0 100%

MO979 1 0 100%

TC272HV 1 0 100%

Grand Total 58 25,605 8 3,192 7 0


H-i

APPENDIX H

SECTION 8.0 - ATLAS OF GENERAL-PURPOSE FACILITIES


H-ii



H-1

APPENDIX H

SECTION 8.0 SUPPORT - ATLAS OF GENERAL-PURPOSE FACILITIES


H-2


H-3


H-4


H-5


H-6


H-7


H-8


H-9


H-10


H-11


H-12


H-13


H-14


H-15


H-16


H-17


H-18


H-19


H-20


H-21


H-22


H-23


H-24


H-25


H-26


H-27


H-28


H-29