gamma ray log.pptx

40
7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 1/40 THE GAMMA RAY LOG 

Upload: catarac19

Post on 03-Apr-2018

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 1/40

THE GAMMA RAY LOG 

Page 2: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 2/40

Introduction • The gamma ray log measures the total natural gamma

radiation emanating from a formation.

• This gamma radiation originates from potassium-40and the isotopes of the Uranium-Radium and Thoriumseries.

• The gamma ray log is commonly given the symbol GR.

• Once the gamma rays are emitted from an isotope inthe formation, they progressively reduce in energy asthe result of collisions with other atoms in the rock

(compton scattering).

• Compton scattering occurs until the gamma ray is of such a low energy that it is completely absorbed by theformation.

Page 3: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 3/40

• Hence, the gamma ray intensity that the logmeasures is a function of:

 – The initial intensity of gamma ray emission, which is aproperty of the elemental composition of the rock.

 – The amount of compton scattering that the gammarays encounter, which is related to the distancebetween the gamma emission and the detector and

the density of the intervening material.

• The tool therefore has a limited depth of investigation.

• The gamma ray log is combinable with all tools,and is almost always used as part of every loggingcombination run because of its ability to matchthe depths of data from each run.

Page 4: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 4/40

Principles 

• Gamma rays are bursts of high-energyelectromagnetic waves that are emittedspontaneously by some radioactive elements.

• Nearly all the gamma radiation encountered inthe earth is emitted by the radioactive potassiumisotope of atomic weight 40 (K40)and by theradioactive elements of the uranium and thoriumseries.

• Each of these elements emits gamma rays; thenumber and energies of which are distinctive of each element.

Page 5: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 5/40

• In passing through matter, gamma rays experiencesuccessive Compton-scattering collisions with atoms of the formation material, losing energy with each

collision.• After the gamma ray has lost enough energy, it is

absorbed, by means of the photoelectric effect, by anatom of the formation.

• Thus, natural gamma rays are gradually absorbed andtheir energies degraded (reduced) as they pass throughthe formation.

• The rate of absorption varies with formation density.Two formations having the same amount of radioactive

material per unit volume, but having differentdensities, will show different radioactivity levels.

• The less dense formations will appear to be slightlymore radioactive.

Page 6: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 6/40

Equipment

• The GR sonde contains a detector to measure the gammaradiation originating in the volume of formation near thesonde.

• Scintillation counters are now generally used for this

measurement.• The tool consists simply of a highly sensitive gamma ray

detector in the form of a scintillation counter.

• The scintillation counter is composed of a single sodiumiodide crystal backed by a photomultiplier.

• When a gamma ray strikes the crystal a small flash of light isproduced.

• This flash is too small to be measured using conventionalelectronics.

Page 7: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 7/40

• Instead, it is amplified by a photomultiplier, whichconsists of a photocathode and a series of anodes heldat progressively higher electrical potentials, all of whichare arranged serially in a high vacuum.

• The flash of light hits the photocathode and causes anumber of  primary electrons to be produced.

These few electrons still represent too small a signal tobe measured

• The primary electrons are accelerated towards the firstanode.

For every electron that hits the anode, a number of secondary electrons are emitted (between 4 and 8usually).

Page 8: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 8/40

• These electrons are accelerated towards the nextanode, where each of the secondary electrons produceeven more secondary electrons.

• This process is repeated for each of say 10 anodes.

• If 6 electrons are emitted at each anode for eachincident electron, we can see that a single incidentgamma ray ultimately produces 610 = 60,466,176

electrons, which represents a current that can beamplified further by conventional amplifiers.

• Since the flash of light and the number of primaryelectrons is proportional to the energy of the gamma

ray, the final current from the scintillation counter isalso proportional to the energy of the incident gammaray.

Page 9: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 9/40

Calibration 

• We might expect the units for gamma ray logging to be ingamma counts per second.

• But the gamma ray log is reported in pseudo-units calledAPI units.

The API unit is defined empirically by calibration to areference well at the University of Houston.

• This reference well is an artificial one that is composed of large blocks of rock of accurately known radioactivityranging from very low radioactivity to very large

radioactivity.• The radioactivities in sedimentary formations generally

range from a few API units in anhydrite or salt to 200 ormore in shales.

Page 10: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 10/40

• Tools are run in the Houston well (test pit),

and are used as standards to calibrate further tools at local test pits.

• A further calibration check is also carried out

at the well-site before and after the log is run,by using a radioactive source of accurately

known radioactivity a fixed distance from the

tool.

Page 11: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 11/40

Log Presentation 

• The total gamma ray log is usually recorded in track 1with the caliper log, bit size and SP log.

• In this case, the other tracks most often includeresistivity, density, neutron or sonic logs.

Although the API scale goes from 0 to 200 API, it ismore common to see 0 to 100 API and 0 to 150.

• API used in log presentations, as data greater than 150API is not common.

When gamma ray logging is carried out through thecement casing, a scale of 0 to 50 API is most oftenused, as a result of the lower values measured due tothe attenuation of the gamma count rate by the casing.

Page 12: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 12/40

Gamma log presentation

Page 13: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 13/40

Depth of Investigation 

• The gamma rays are attenuated by compton scattering

by all materials between the atom that emitted thegamma ray and the detector, which includes the rockitself and the drilling mud.

• The degree of attenuation depends upon the numberdensity of atoms in the material, and this is related tothe density of the material.

• There is a distribution of gamma ray energies, but asdistance from the emitting atom increases, the energyof the gamma rays decreases due to compton

scattering until they are too low to be measured by thescintillation counter.

• Clearly, therefore, there is a maximum depth of investigation for the tool that depends upon formationand mud density.

Page 14: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 14/40

• For average values of drilling mud and formationdensity, we can say that approximately 50% of thegamma ray signal comes from within 18 cm (7 inches)

of the borehole wall, increasing to 75% from within 30cm (1 foot).

• Hence, the depth of investigation, if defined at 75% of the signal, is 30 cm.

• However, this will decrease for denser formations of the same radioactivity, and increase for less denseformations of the same radioactivity.

• The zone of sensitivity is almost hemispherical, so the

30 cm depth of investigation applies both horizontally(perpendicular to the borehole wall) and sub-vertically(sub-parallel with the borehole wall).

Page 15: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 15/40

Logging Speed 

• Radioactive emissions are random, and hence fluctuate

in an unpredictable way with time.

• If the count rates are high, this causes no real problemsas there are sufficiently many counts in a reasonabletime interval for the fluctuations to average out.

• In gamma ray logging, the count rate is low so thefluctuations have to be taken into account.

• For each measurement depth, the tool must linger longenough to measure enough count in order to obtain

good quality data.

• The output from the detector is measured as a gammaray count rate, which is averaged over a time definedby a time constant Tc. 

Page 16: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 16/40

Vertical Resolution 

• There are three factors governing the vertical

resolution: – The size of the detector, which is quite small (about 5-

10 cm diameter).

 – The effect of the time constant. For conventional

logging, with the product of logging speed and timeconstant set to 1 foot, the contribution to degradationin the vertical resolution from his cause is 1 foot.

 – The hemispherical zone of sensitivity of the sensor. Asthe sensor is sensitive to gamma rays from a

hemispherical zone, and its approximate depth of investigation of about 30 cm (1 foot) for formations of average density, we can see that the degradation invertical resolution from this source will be about 2foot.

Page 17: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 17/40

• Hence, the vertical resolution of the tool is

 just over 3 foot (90 cm).

• This is quite a high vertical resolution for an

open-hole tool, and so the gamma ray tool is

good at defining thin beds, for fine

correlation, and for depth matching between

logging runs.

Page 18: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 18/40

Borehole Quality 

• The gamma ray log usually runs centered inthe borehole. If the borehole suffers fromcaving, the gamma ray log can be badly

affected.• In intervals that suffer from caving, there is

more drilling mud between the formation andthe gamma ray detector to attenuate thegamma rays produced by the formation.

• Hence, the log is underestimated

Page 19: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 19/40

Page 20: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 20/40

• The denser the mud used, the greater the

underestimation will be, because of increasedcompton scattering in the drilling mud.

• Barite muds are a particular problem as barite

is very efficient at absorbing gamma rays.• The measured overestimation may usually be

corrected if the caliper log for the well is

known.

Page 21: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 21/40

• Comparison of the two log patterns show the

degree to which the caving has affected thegamma ray reading.

• Corrections are carried out using correction

charts supplied by the logging tool company.• Each tool design has its own set of charts,

which are drawn up for a range of drilling

fluids and tool geometries.

Page 22: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 22/40

Mud Type 

• The density of the drilling mud (mud weight)effects the signal because higher density mudsattenuate gamma rays more.

• This effect is taken account of by the boreholecorrection.

• However, extra care should be taken with

barite drilling muds, as barite is very efficientat attenuating gamma rays and will give ananomalously low gamma ray reading.

Page 23: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 23/40

• It is assumed that the drilling mud attenuates the

gamma ray signal, but does not contribute to it.

• While this is true of many drilling muds, it is notgenerally true.

• Potassium chloride-based drilling muds are not

uncommon.• These muds have a natural gamma radioactivity

associated with potassium-40.

•The radiation from KCl drilling muds contributesto the total gamma ray count rate measured,

increasing it considerably.

Page 24: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 24/40

Page 25: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 25/40

• Problems may arise if the borehole diametervaries, leading to varying amounts of drilling-fluid

between the formation and the sensor withdepth.

• In caved holes in radioactive formations there isusually no effect observed as the caving

effectively replaces a radioactive formation withradioactive drilling fluid.

• However, a significant local increase in thegamma ray log can be observed where very lowradioactivity formations, such as someevaporites, have been washed out.

Page 26: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 26/40

Uses of the Total Gamma Ray Log 

• Determination of Lithology

• Determination of Shale Content

• Depth Matching

• Cased Hole Correlations

• Recognition of Radioactive Mineral Deposits

• Recognition of Non-Radioactive Mineral

Deposits

• Facies and Depositional Environment Analysis

Page 27: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 27/40

Page 28: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 28/40

Page 29: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 29/40

Page 30: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 30/40

Determination of Shale Content  

• In most reservoirs the lithologies are quitesimple, being cycles of sandstones and shales orcarbonates and shales.

Once the main lithologies have been identified,the gamma ray log values can be used tocalculate the shaliness or shale volume (Vsh) of the rock.

• This is important as a threshold value of shalevolume is often used to help discriminatebetween reservoir and non-reservoir rock.

Page 31: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 31/40

• Shale volume is calculated in a way, where first thegamma ray index IGR is calculated from the gamma raylog data using the relationship

• where:

 – IGR = the gamma ray index 

 – GRlog = the gamma ray reading at the depth of interest 

 – GRmin = the minimum gamma ray reading. (Usually themean minimum through a clean sandstone or carbonateformation.)

 – GRmax = the maximum gamma ray reading. (Usually themean maximum through a shale or clay formation.)

Page 32: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 32/40

• Many petrophysicists then assume that Vsh = IGR.

• However, to be correct the value of IGR should be

entered into the chart, from which thecorresponding value of Vsh may be read.

• It should be noted that the calculation of shalevolume is a ‘black art’ as much depends upon the

experience of the petrophysicist in defining whatis the minimum (sand line) and the maximum(shale line) values.

• Noting that the sand line and/or shale line may

be at one gamma ray value in one part of the welland at another gamma ray value at deeper levels.

Page 33: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 33/40

Page 34: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 34/40

Depth Matching 

• The gamma ray tool is run as part of almost

every tool combination.

• It has a high reliability and a high vertical

resolution.

• The tool will also show a useful decrease

when opposite casing.

• For all these reasons, the tools is commonly

used to match the depths of data from a givendepth interval made at different times with

different tool combinations.

Page 35: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 35/40

Cased Hole Correlations 

A different type of depth matching relates open holemeasurements to cased hole and production loggingmeasurements.

• Clearly, we would want to match accurately the depthsat which open-hole data are taken and the depths atwhich cased-hole or production logging data are taken.

• The gamma ray log allow this matching to beperformed, ensuring that accurate depth control ismaintained during cased-hole logging, and while

perforating the correct depths.

• Note that the gamma ray readings will be less in thecased holes due to the attenuation of gamma rays bythe cement casing.

Page 36: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 36/40

Recognition of Radioactive Mineral 

Deposits • The gamma ray log can be used to recognize certain

radioactive deposits, the most common of which arepotash deposits and uranium ores.

• Potassium-40 emits gamma rays with the single energy of 1.46 MeV.

• This results in there being a linear relationship between thegamma ray count rate and the content of potassium in theformation.

• In potash deposits, the gamma ray reading after hole size

correction gives approximately 15 API units per 1%wt. K2O.• There is no simple relationship between the gamma ray

reading and the abundance of uranium in a formation,because the energy spectrum also includes radiation fromother elements in the uranium-radium series.

Page 37: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 37/40

Recognition of Non-Radioactive

Mineral Deposits 

• Particular deposits have a very low natural

radioactivity.

• The gamma ray log can also be used to

indicate these.

• Formations with extremely low natural

radioactivities are the non-radioactive

evaporites (salt, anhydrite and gypsum), and

coal beds.

Page 38: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 38/40

Radio-isotope Tracer Operations 

• Deliberate doping of fluids with radioactive

tracers is sometimes carried out to find the

location of pipe leaks and channeling behind

the casing.

• The gamma ray log is sometimes employed as

a detector in these cases.

Page 39: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 39/40

Facies and Depositional Environment 

 Analysis 

• We have seen that the gamma ray log is oftenused to measure the shaliness of a formation.

• In reality the shaliness often does not change

suddenly, but occurs gradually with depth.• Such gradual changes are indicative of the litho-

facies and the depositional environment of therock, and are associated with changes in grain

size and sorting that are controlled by facies anddepositional environment as well as beingassociated with the shaliness of the rock.

Page 40: Gamma Ray Log.pptx

7/29/2019 Gamma Ray Log.pptx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gamma-ray-logpptx 40/40