gas recycling project

52
Gas Recycling in Gas Condensate Reservoirs What? Why? How? 11/25/2014 1

Upload: engye7ia

Post on 23-Dec-2015

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Gas process and recycling

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gas Recycling Project

Gas Recycling

in Gas

Condensate

Reservoirs What?

Why?

How?

11/25/2014

1

Page 2: Gas Recycling Project

Submitted by

Ahmed Farag Rizk.

Mohamed Ata Farahat.

Ali Yahya Gergis.

Semak Zaghlol.

Mokhtar Ahmed Husieen.

Mohamed Fathy Salem.

Tarek Ali.

11/25/2014 2

Page 3: Gas Recycling Project

Agenda Five Reservoir Fluids.

Retrograde Gas.

Reservoir Regions.

Condensate Problem.

Method of Implementation.

Process Efficiency.

Advantages and Disadvantages.

Economics.

Case Study.

11/25/2014 3

Page 4: Gas Recycling Project

Five Reservoir Fluids Reservoir

Fluids

black oil Volatile oil Gas

Condensate Wet Gas Dry Gas

Black Oil Volatile

Oil

Retrogra

de Gas

Wet Gas Dry Gas

Initial

Producin

g GLR

(scf/STB)

<1,750 1,750-

3,200

>3,200 >15,000 100,000

11/25/2014 4

Page 5: Gas Recycling Project

Five Reservoir Fluids

11/25/2014 5

Page 6: Gas Recycling Project

Retrograde Phenomena

The formation of liquid hydrocarbons in a gas

reservoir as the pressure in the reservoir

decreases below dewpoint pressure during

production.

It is called retrograde because some of the

gas condenses into a liquid under isothermal

conditions instead of expanding or vaporizing

when pressure is decreased

11/25/2014 6

Page 7: Gas Recycling Project

Retrograde gas‐condensate

11/25/2014 7

Page 8: Gas Recycling Project

Retrograde gas‐condensate

Gas Condensate reservoir

Near Critical Lean gas

condensate Rich gas

condensate

11/25/2014 8

Page 9: Gas Recycling Project

Near‐critical Gas‐condensate

Reservoir

11/25/2014 9

Page 10: Gas Recycling Project

Lean Gas Condensate & Rich

Gas Condensate

11/25/2014 10

Page 11: Gas Recycling Project

Liquid Dropout %

11/25/2014 11

Page 12: Gas Recycling Project

Reservoir Regions

11/25/2014 12

Page 13: Gas Recycling Project

Reservoir Regions

Region I - Near Wellbore

Close to the wellbore with high condensate saturation.

Both gas and condensate are flowing simultaneously.

Region I exists only when bottomhole flowing pressure is less than P*(pressure at which condensate saturation is equal to the critical saturation).

11/25/2014 13

Page 14: Gas Recycling Project

Reservoir Regions

Region 2‐condensate build up Where condensate is dropping out of the gas phase.

Exists when the reservoir pressure declines below the dew point pressure.

The liquid drop out begins as the dew point is

approached. However, it is not mobile since the condensate saturation is less than Sc.

Therefore, in this region only gas phase is mobile whereas condensate is immobile.

11/25/2014 14

Page 15: Gas Recycling Project

Reservoir Regions

Region III – Single Gas Phase

Region in the reservoir which contains only the

original reservoir gas.

This is the farthest region in the reservoir .

reservoir pressure is greater than dew point pressure.

11/25/2014 15

Page 16: Gas Recycling Project

Gas Condensate Reservoir

Problems

Condensate Blockage.

Gas permeability reduction.

Loss of Condensate.

Liquid loading problems

11/25/2014 16

Page 17: Gas Recycling Project

Possible Solutions

Reduce pressure drawdown.

Maintain pressure above dewpoint by gas cyclic or injection.

Hydraulic fracture.

Horizontal wells.

11/25/2014 17

Page 18: Gas Recycling Project

Why Gas Re-injection Solution Disadvantage

Reducing D.D. Deal with the well not the

reservoir.

Gas cyclic Short term benefit

Hyd. Frac. Increase permeability till

condensate accumulation

happen.

Horizontal wells High cost

11/25/2014 18

Page 19: Gas Recycling Project

Why Gas Re-injection?

Maintain reservoir pressure.

Long-term benefit.

The injected gas will be produced later.

Condensate will not be lost inside the reservoir.

11/25/2014 19

Page 20: Gas Recycling Project

Gas Recycling Target: Maximum recovery of the valuable condensate

Definition: The process of keeping the reservoir pressure above the

dew point pressure to minimize or eliminate the formation of condensate at the reservoir conditions .

Statistics: The condensate recovery factor by depletion ranges

between 20‐40%.

This recovery factor can be increased with cycling to between 60‐75%.

11/25/2014 20

Page 21: Gas Recycling Project

Gas Recycling Data required:

(1) Geologic data. (2) Rock and fluid properties. (3) Reservoir pressure history. (4) Condensate, gas, and water production

data, from the date of discovery. (5) Proposed future production rates. (6) Gas- and/or water-injection data, past and

future. (7) Productivity, injectivity & Backpressure test

data on wells.

11/25/2014 21

Page 22: Gas Recycling Project

Implementation Method

11/25/2014 22

Page 23: Gas Recycling Project

Injection Pattern Developed field: In which gas recycling starts after

long period of natural depletion

Undeveloped field: By model study well arrangements are then selected.

Injection fluid with the maximum possible contact with the crude oil system.

Well pattern selection depend mainly on the comparison of which is economically practical and which is theoretically efficient.

11/25/2014 23

Page 24: Gas Recycling Project

Injection Pattern

11/25/2014 24

Page 25: Gas Recycling Project

Injected Gas Type:

HC.

N2.

CO2.

Source:

Closed system.

Open system.

Semi-closed system.

11/25/2014 25

Page 26: Gas Recycling Project

Handling of Production

Main Equipment

Separator , Compressor & fractionation equipment.

Desulphurization:

Reagents used: Sodium carbonate solution (regeneration

by air current).Sodium phenolate (regeneration by heating),Amines (regeneration by heating).

11/25/2014 26

Page 27: Gas Recycling Project

Handling of Production Dehydration:

Various desiccants are used, both solids (silica gel, activated aluminum, calcium sulphate, anhydrite, fluorite, etc.) and liquids (glycols). There is practically no economic method for the removal of oxygen from gas.

Filtration:

Injection gas must be free from solid or liquid particles. Scrubbers and filters are thus installed in the system so as to remove all particles larger than a few microns.

11/25/2014 27

Page 28: Gas Recycling Project

Reservoir cycling efficiency

𝐸𝑅 = 𝐸𝐴𝐸𝑉𝐸𝐷

EA Area enclosed by injected gas divided

by total reservoir area.

EV Pore space invaded by injected gas

divided by total thickness.

ED Volume of wet HC swept out of

individual pores divided by same pores at

the beginning of cycling.

11/25/2014 28

Page 29: Gas Recycling Project

Factors Affecting Efficiency

Mobility ratio:

The viscosity of lighter dry gas is less than that

of wet gas.

𝑀 =𝑘𝑑𝑔 ∗ 𝜇𝑟𝑔

𝑘𝑟𝑔 ∗ 𝜇𝑑𝑔

M should be ≤ 1

Gravity difference:

Gravity difference may accelerate the early

breakthrough of dry gas

11/25/2014 29

Page 30: Gas Recycling Project

Factors Affecting Efficiency

Formation volume

factor:

The FVF of the dry gas

is greater than for the

wet.

There is a volume

difference.

11/25/2014 30

Page 31: Gas Recycling Project

Factors Affecting Efficiency

Vertical Permeability:

Case 1

11/25/2014 31

Page 32: Gas Recycling Project

Factors Affecting Efficiency

Vertical Permeability:

Case 2

11/25/2014 32

Page 33: Gas Recycling Project

Factors Affecting Efficiency

Type of injected gas: Effect of different injection gases on condensate saturation

reduction during the production period.

11/25/2014 33

Page 34: Gas Recycling Project

Advantages Available techniques that used for that method.

Availability of different types of gases.

Maintain pressure of reservoir.

Increase amount of condensate recovery.

Increase gas permeability.

Deviated or crooked holes can be injected by gas.

Easy maintenance for surface equipment.

11/25/2014 34

Page 35: Gas Recycling Project

Disadvantages large amount of gas is required.

Huge compressor is required to inject gas.

Complex process to isolate gas and its impurities.

Condensate liquid builds up near wellbore causing a reduction in gas permeability and gas productivity.

Impurities with gas ( H2S & Co2 ) can cause corrosion.

11/25/2014 35

Page 36: Gas Recycling Project

Economics

Profit = revenue – cost

Present day value (PDV)

Expectations of condensate and gas

prices.

Condensate demand.

11/25/2014 36

Page 37: Gas Recycling Project

Economics

cost

capital

compressors

Additional pipelines

New wells

Additional separation units

operating

gas Power

consumption

11/25/2014 37

Page 38: Gas Recycling Project

Economics

Revenue

Normal recovery

Additional gas

Additional condensate

11/25/2014 38

Page 39: Gas Recycling Project

Economics

Additional recovery determination must

be so accurate.

Well pattern selection depend mainly on

the comparison of which is economically

practical and which is theoretically

efficient.

11/25/2014 39

Page 40: Gas Recycling Project

Economics Suggested procedure in developing a cycling

project:

1. Determine the reserve and the expected recovery.

2. Determine the expected additional recovery.

3. Draw up a development plan.

4. Determine the required surface facilities.

11/25/2014 40

Page 41: Gas Recycling Project

Economics 5. Economic analysis: a) Taxes.

b) Markets.

c) Economics of size and design of total physical plants:

i. Costs of total physical plants per unit of capacity.

ii. Costs of operations per unit of capacity.

iii. Costs of taxes.

iv. Revenue from markets. v. Estimates of intangible risk factors.

11/25/2014 41

Page 42: Gas Recycling Project

Case Study The North Sea Gas-Condensate System The gas has dew point pressure of 6,750 psi at 280 F

and contains 73.19 mol% methane and 8.21 mol% C7+.

The maximum liquid dropout of 21 .6% occurs at 3100 psi.

11/25/2014 42

Page 43: Gas Recycling Project

11/25/2014 43

Page 44: Gas Recycling Project

Case Study several injection gases including Methane, Nitrogen,

Carbon Dioxide, and various combinations of theses gases were injected at 3100 psi.

The liquid dropout at this pressure is 26%.

11/25/2014 44

Page 45: Gas Recycling Project

Case Study

11/25/2014 45

Page 46: Gas Recycling Project

Case Study

11/25/2014 46

Page 47: Gas Recycling Project

Case Study

11/25/2014 47

Page 48: Gas Recycling Project

Case Study

11/25/2014 48

Page 49: Gas Recycling Project

Case Study Conclusions The study shows that the gas injection process is a

viable option for reducing the liquid blockage in the near wellbore region.

Results of the study indicate that all the injection gases used in this investigation can actually increase the liquid blockage when they are injected with insufficient volume.

The gas injection process is particularly effective when initiated before the maximum liquid dropout is reached.

11/25/2014 49

Page 50: Gas Recycling Project

Reference Understanding gas condensate reservoirs.

Petsoc-77-01-06,recovery of retrograde condensed liquids by revaporization during dry gas injection.

Spe-1813-pa,equilibrium revaporization of retrograde gas condensate by dry gas injection.

Spe-68170-ms,investigation of revaporization of retrograde condensate.

Api-41-221,practical economics of cycling.

11/25/2014 50

Page 51: Gas Recycling Project

11/25/2014 51

Page 52: Gas Recycling Project

11/25/2014 52