The government should stop funding the IITs and the IIMs and, instead, divert the funds to primary education.Favour

India is not a devloped country here litracy ratio is very less so governement should concentrate on make more people litrate rahter then concentrating on small group of population

Students from IIT IIM are moving out of india serving other nation's organiation that is really awfull

India is damocratic country.Damcracy can only be successfull in only one situation that every one should litrate that could be achieved by concentrating on primary education

Spending huge amount of money on IIT & IIM is dividing the nation in 2 diffrent communities one community is not even having primary education where other community is having higher education

The most of the people going for the IIT IIM are self capable so govenment should make all this nstitutes self fiananced and stop funding.

Against

Still india in devlopement mode so need of these institutes to prmote our young talent to international platform.

its true student from IIT IIM are moving out but they are sending back money to the country eventually that money is getting utilised in india itself.

The phase of devlopement through which india is passing by needs more recognization of indian talent pool, which surely needs the more better higher education for young indians.

For democracy we need policy makers so we needs few people who are indians who can create better systems for us IIT's IIM's producing such kinds of brains.

Students from other countries are coming to india so eventually revenue coming back to government pocket.

Conclusion

We cant compare the primary education, which is vary vaste area with IIT IIM which is concentrated to small area.

Funding to IIT IIM can be self financed but there should be proper mechnism and student should get scholarships in case of fees hike

Profit is the only business of business.

Favour

Definitely i feel Businessman getting richer now a days and they are not putting affort for the social causes.

The industries only propogating the all kinds of polloutions in society. The Social work done by the businessmen is minute as compared to the investment it is taking

from the society. The fundamental behind running business is Capitalization .Capitlaization is based on only

profit. Homan life is improving day by day due to business because the kind of innovations

happening due to business is not possible without buiness.The kind of R&D facilities business putting for new innovations is making life better and safer.

Definition of business:Businesses are predominant in capitalist economies, most being privately owned and formed to earn profit to increase the wealth of owners.

Against

Running a buiness a no more only profit because no organizational structure now a days allow buniess money flow to a perticular person the profit go to each and every person in organization as per there role.

Each and every well build organization is giving there profits to charity. The Core capatalization is now no more there because organizations now managed by more

then one person. Business providing the jobs and revenues to society for what ever cost society give to

business. In economics, a business (also called firm or enterprise) is a legally recognized organizational

entity designed to provide goods and/or services to consumers or corporate entities such as governments, charities or other businesses.

Conclusion

Buiness is definitely a profit making enterprise but the benifits society getting out of it is also considerable.

Due to buiseness only the human life is getting better and safer.

Democracy has hampered India’s progress.

Favour

Democracy definitely hampred the progress because the people who have chosen by the indian people are not educated enough and capable enough to run the government properly.

Democracy putting forward lot of restrictions on business to run it as profitable enterpise rther then it is becoming more like running for social causes.

In some sense yes. You know, becaus of the way the system is built, lot of regulations and formalities come into picture. The bureaucracy leads to delays.

Yes,as all can see from the TV news and read the papers,everything is being moulded according to the wishes of the so called protectors of the democracy.

Why separate scales are being used for same kind of work/service.

Against

Democracy is the only reason of India's progress. there is no greater system for a country than a vibrant democracy . there may be problem, but then what system does not have the problem. there will always be problem in any system, but we have to overcome that and keep trying to do so. no system can ever be foolproof because no two men always can think alike.

just look to Pakistan for a reference. or if you have China in mind, there bubble will burst one day like USSR did.

At the time of Independence, the average income of Pakistanis was higher than that of Indians. Today after almost 60 years of democracy in India (bloody and violent democracy at time I will admit) and 60 years of dictatorships, military rule and religious control in Pakistan, the average income of Indians is about 300% higher than Pakistan and India is now in the process of becoming a genuine world "superpower."

Conclusion

There might be some problem with the democracy but no system is fullproof we can ectify them.

Are we raising a generation of burnt out children?

Favour

The reason for pushing the children hard today is to nurture them to face the competitive world tomorrow.

Developing talent is not a sin, it will help the child in his future. It is a trickle down effect from the kind of competition experienced for entry into engineering

colleges, graduation and others. as darwin said that most eligible can survive it is only the way to make the children able so

that they can survive in the sea of humans.

Against

The basic needs of childhood are, time to play, place to play and explore the world through his eyes.

In the name of competition we are raising fatigues children. The stress is resulting into children engaging in all kinds of derogative acts.

Conclusion

It is true that compitition is growing day by day but child hood is age for playing making friends so parents should let there kids to do the same.

Advertising is all glitter and little truth.

Favour

The stars prmoting the product most of the time dont take its responsibility moreover they not even use the product.

Advertisers have to depict what the customers like, enjoy keeping in mind the clients requirements.

As the products increase and so the ads, glitter is a way to ensure brand recall, a very important factor for the advertising firms.

Most of the time compnies over showcase there product qualities which is not fair. There are lot of examples like a person eat a chewgum and become so cool that girls start

following him or take example of a famous perfume where if guys use that perfume girls start running behind them all these are totally fake.

Advertising is a business and not charity. Companies hire advertisers for their promoting their products and it is not vice versa.

Against

Advertising firms carry responsibility of providing customers with unbiased information about products.

In order to have a healthy bottom line the ad firms cannot shun their responsibility towards the society.

Ad firms have to develop the ethical content into their processes to ensure fair deals. There are advertisement available which show the notice that it is medically proven or they

are having proof.

Conclusion

Advertiements are somewhat made to attract the costomers and some time they might only glitter but some times they are also true

Is bureaucracy a hindrance to economic reforms in India?

Favour

The system in which these bureocrats works includes the politicians and other factors which is affecting the decisons made by the bureocrats in a huge way . So basically as human being every body is thinking about himself.They are taking decisons of there own benefits.

As the laws have not changed significantly, bureaucrats still play a major role in the process of a business.

The way to successfully implement the reforms is to reduce the amount of paperwork and red tape involved.

Against

Bureocracy is not at all hindrance because someone has to play this role.it is necessity. Bureaucracy is a necessity no doubt, to have control over the activities of the private sector. Rules and regulations that are laid down have to be implemented and the masses have to be

looked after which is not possible without the help of bureaucrats. As a company requires people to run the business, government also requires bureaucrats to

run its affairs.

Conclusion

Burreaucracy is not a problem but the problem is the system in which these bureaocrats work makes the and corrupt and problematic for the business.Need is to make process more transprent and decision making should be lottery based or based on a group of people rather depending on single person.

Film-makers are indulging in cinematic Fortitution in the name of folk culture.

Favour

Movie released in theaters is a result of what the producer and director along with his crew put together. The producer being the investor and the director the creator it is left to them to decide what they want to create and produce.

The producer and the director take a gamble trying to woo the crowd by showing what they want.

Current trend in movies is towards folk culture, which may fade away soon. The producers are distorting the history and represnet in wrongly in front of viwers for sake of

money.

Against

Film makers are prmoting our values and traditions by these movies. If the movie is on folk culture then it should elucidate the beauty of the culture and there

should not be any masala added to lure the audience. Folk culture is to be preserved in its natural and an inheritance should not be used to make

money out of it by depicting the same in movies.

Conclusion

It should ok if filmamakers are making folk movies but one thing they should kept in mind they must not present wrong facts in front of viwers.

Under Indian parliamentary democracy it is impossible to ensure balanced regional development. (IIMC)

Favour

The fundamental principles of democracy preach to ensure balanced regional development. Uniform representation in the Lower House by MPs from all over the country is to bring out

regional problems and demands of people from across the country. Constitution is completely unbiased for any kind of regional growth

Against

The government tends to be biased towards vote banks while making and implementing policies.

The minorities are usually left out in the power game and all the agitation by various minorities is an example of the lopsided development.

Most of the important people of our country stays in metros or frequently visits metros so the expect the better facilties there so they them selves take such decisons which prmote the growth of only metros whereas rest of india being untouched with growth.

Conclusion

The Democracy and constitution dont support any kind of regional bias but politician them selves only biased.

Corruption is the main outcome of democracy in India.(IIML)

Favour

The fact that the system provides equality to everyone ,from whatsoever background and competency makes it easier to play around loopholes in the Indian Statute

Democracy not play a direct role to prmote the corruption but it give power to the people who could be non capable and have there own aims and shelfishness.

Democracy not play a direct role to prmote the corruption but it give power to the people who could be non capable and have there own aims and shelfishness.

In damocratic system a person is chosen by other people.This procedure could be faulty because human being can be motivated trough the means of greed,or fear.

Against

The risk of Democracy is a systemic risk ; corruption is a personal equation and holds good or bad depending on an individual's and organization's personal value systems. The two should therefore not be construed/ read as a cause- effect relationship.

Democracy give choice to people to select the leaders on the basis of there capabilty and goodness.If people choose the wrong leaders then that is not the problem with democracy that is the problem with people.

Conclusion

The democracy dont support the curruption at

all.But the people them selves are greedy and selfish who are motivatd for corruption.

In an over-regulated society corruption is inevitable.(MICA) Favour

Forcing human mind to follow the rules which are unnecessary and biased make them revolutionary and they move towards revange and corruption is one of the way to take that revange form governement.

Few people believe laws are made to be broken so this is case of the economic phenomenon of regulatory arbitrage

Against

corruption is a personal equation and holds good or bad depending on an individual's and organization's personal value systems.Regulations , like democracy is a systemic phenomenon ;Both have nothing to do with each other.

Conclusion

Over regulating simple things of daily life can create problem in daily life but regulations are must to run the complex morden life .

The money being put into cricket is harming the development of other sports. (SCMHRD)

Favour

Every sponser is running behind cricket Getting sponsored to other sports is difficult, and the players could not have the latest equipment (sport gears).

Cannot not compete with other countries the money flowing in to cricket attracting all the young population less people intrested in

making career in other sports.

Against

Department of sports or the Sports ministry has a fixed budget and has to allocate the same to productive use. If the demands from cricket are high the dept. has no other option but to fund them.

The number of aspiring cricketers speaks for itself how popular a game it is in the nation. A lot of funding also comes from sponsors who will fund the game that gives them maximum

publicity and in India cricket is no doubt the game.

Conclusion

It seems true that money in cricket is harming other games because the youths only want to play cricket due to this money.

Women's empowerment will lead to social development.

Favour

Woman is the base of a family.When you empower a women, you empower a family. Major influence on the children and thus the society. Empowerment of woman will give new workforce for society.

Against

No direct connection. Empowerment of woman Will lead to nuclear families and split homes.

Conclusion

Woman are most important part of society her empowerment is must of rdevlopement.

Men resent women power at work place

Favour

Males want to dominate women in every part of society and work because of there traditional male ego.

Its common doubt in society wether woman can become good mangers.

Against

Its women who avoid power and responsibility in the work area. Its woman mentallty who feels that.

Conclusion

In past surely man are not giving the same place to woman in diffrent areas of life but now situation is changing very fast

Youth in India are becoming greedy by the day

Favour

Surely the young genration is becoming greedy every one running behind easy money and dont want to put the efforts to earn it by hard work.

The youth is getting so much opportunities ,still they want to go to ONsite and earn money from there they dont want to contribute in nations growth but want more benfits from government.

Youth dont want to stay in india they want to sattle abroad.

Against

Ambition is being misunderstood for greediness. The way youth behaved in last decade in india the way they have worked and shown there

qualities made the india one of the biggest contender for next super power.

Conclusion

The youth some how running behind money but there ambitions and dreams are acelrated by there own hard work so they derve it.

India should be reorganized into smaller states.

Favour

By dividing the problem in small parts and cooncentrating on the problems regionvise there are more chances of better growth

We need governance at small level so that we can manage and regulate the life more appropriately

By recognizing the india into smaller states on the basis of problems(illittracy,poority)can give the chance to goverment to resolve those problems on those portions of india

Against

Dividing india into not the solution of the problem.Because it creates hatered and bifurcation between people of 2 states.

More over dividing on the basis of caste and religion is creating more issues like minor ,major population with in newly created state

Even if we divide on the basis of problem We can resolve that perticular problem but that state again left in total growth.

The resources of the india become property of that state so other states become insecure and only people of that perticular reason become more rich.

Conclusion

Recognizing the india into smaller states is not a good idea We can recognize few more states on the basis of problem in that area so that those problem

could be resolved but proper laws should be there Dividing the india into smaller states on the basis of caste and religion is not worthy.

eve TEASING: Boys or Girl

Favour of (Boys)

Girl motivate the boys with there body language and sometimes there colothes do play the role to motivate boys

Most of the times girl dont react on this kind of activities that might be due to there shy nature but boys got motivation due to this.

Girls should reply back or report back to police so if any one is doing this kind of activities should stop this.

Against of Boys

Boys are completly reponsible of uch kind of acts. But not all boys are the same.Few boys who are illitrate and low class are mostly doing this

kind of activities.

Conclusion

All the time not boys are reponible but few times girls are also responible. Goverment should take strict action against. this kind of people. Girls should alo raise therevoice if someone tease them.

Banning smoke in public place is a right decision

Favour of (Boys)

It is indeed a right decesion it has been trouble some for every one who is not smoking Due to passive Smoking cancer and asthama are part of indian society.Why should one pay for

other people bad habbit On the name of peronal freedom we cant allow people to smoke publically.Nikotine kills more

people then other drugs like marijuana or snort coke. This is extremly unfair for those people who are forced to be passive smokers.

Against of Boys

Banning smoke in public places is dminishing act for our personal freedom. Its choice of the people who are standing beside smokers that they want to stay there or go.

Conclusion

It should be banned completly because it is cause of dangerous dieaseases like heart problem and cancer.

Government should implement the rule strictly Governement should raise the price of TOBACO products.

Should INDIA Change Its National Game?

Favour

indian national game should be cricket because it has just become the craming line that our national game is hockey. no-one knows the name of their players and about their match schedules except few one. change is the requirement of today. if we do not change anything we can not progress.

The National game should be the choice of the nation which is cricket. if Hockey is not able to create any sensation among the youths then its not our fault. It's the

weakness of the game.

Against

lready cricket is religion in india and none of the sports is as famous as cricket in india.So,other sports like hockey should be encouraged not it should be pushed back.If national game is changed then it may affect the performance of hockey players........

no today we change national game,tomorrow national anthen,then pledge n it will go on this is not the point.

I don;t think we should change the national game just because we lost some matches or not many knows their players name...!!!! I don't know what is the criteria for selecting a national sport...

just because present hockey team is not performing like what it used to,we should not conclude that their days are gone , instead gov. should pay attention here and provide them proper facilities to regain their position

just because present hockey team is not performing like what it used to,we should not conclude that their days are gone , instead gov. should pay attention here and provide them proper facilities to regain their position

Games are seen for fun . n i think hockey is also a lot of fun, as is cricket... Game dosen't bring sensation.media and people makes the game popular.For a fact india is

having 1/6th of world's population and only one game is popular.Where as is in other countries like china,usa rusia all game have equal importance and popularity.

In biggest coutries like USA russia china cricket is not popular so if someday become unpopular in india u will again ask for some other game

Conclusion

National game is related with identity of nation it can't be change. If we are feeling patriotic on this issue we should morve forward and try make it

popular .Businessmen can sponser it.Common can watch it and motivate there kids to join thi game and government can facilitate the players.

India should perform best in its national game.

Social network Boon or Banor

Social networking privacy issuesFavor (Boon)

Social networks are new meaning of staying in touch with whole world. The internet a tool that an increasing number of people are choosing to use with great

frequency. Too many of these people forget that the internet is a unrestricted, unregulated, and uncontrollable grouping of millions of people, their data, their opinions, and there interests.

Public sharing of private lives has not led to a rethinking of anything. It's just reminded people to use extreme caution when publicly sharing their private lives. If you wouldn't do something in front of everyone you know, don't do it on the internet.

Laws should --never-- be extended to allow privacy protection for things that people say and do in the public domain. Perhaps the greatest part of the internet is the lack of control, the utter and complete freedom of speech. What is needed is a basic warning from parents or friends to those who are new to the internet, warning of the possible pitfalls that can come with such freedom.

Humans are social animals by our nature and social networks are just one other outlet for humans to interact. We should not look at social networks are threats but as opportunities for us to interact with people globally. I myself am an active user of social networks and have made many friends and business contacts online that I would otherwise not have had the same level of opportunity or interaction.

Against (Ban)

Social-networking sites allow seemingly trivial gossip to be distributed to a worldwide audience, sometimes making people the butt of rumors shared by millions of users across the Internet.

Public sharing of private lives has led to a rethinking of our current conceptions of privacy. Existing law should be extended to allow some privacy protection for things that people say

and do in what would have previously been considered the public domain. A guy who posted a video on Youtube weightlifting,skiing, and performing karate exhibitions.

He was fired from his job for showing to much Bravado. like other human social interactions which are transient, e.g. talking to friends over lunch, the

Internet keeps a permanent record of what we say to each other. If you are having an online conversation with your friend(s) then you should be aware that conversation can be seen by countless others and that a record of that conversation will be kept somewhere on the Internet. Indeed, now with some social networks introducing geolocation services a record of where we go and how long we spend there will also be maintained.

There was one incident where robbers using user's geolocation on facebook to find out when target is at home or not.

People need to be aware of the environment within which they are communicating to others. If you are discussing things in a public forum then all that information is available to everyone else in that forum. Therefore hey should take a common sense approach to what they should and should not discuss. In the real world we only talk about sensitive issues when we are in private and with people we trust. I think though that when people are online they can fall into a false sense of security because there are physically in a secure place using their computer either in their office or their home which results in them divulging information they should not.

Conclusion

Social network is indeed boon for human race as it is bringing people closer and letting them communicate with each other without any fear and barriar.But still one nee to cautious of what level of personal information they are revealing on the social networks.

Obama's visit to India-gain or loss.Gain

U.S. President Barack Obama endorsed India's long-held demand for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council, a reflection of the Asian country's growing global weight and its challenge to rival China.

"In the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed United Nations Security Council that includes India as a permanent member," Obama said in a speech to India's parliament on his first official visit to the world's largest democracy.

In his three-day trip -- the longest stay in any foreign country by Obama -- the U.S. leader announced $10 billion in business deals, aiming at reassuring voters at home that countries like India offer benefits for U.S. jobs rather than causing unemployment through outsourcing.

Obama has also announced the United States would relax export controls over sensitive technology, another demand of India's.

He criticised U.S. ally Pakistan over its failure to clamp down on militants. India has long expressed scepticism at U.S. support for Pakistan, saying Islamabad is hoodwinking Washington by taking aid while also backing militants in Afghanistan.

"We will continue to insist to Pakistan's leaders that terrorist safehavens within their borders are unacceptable and that the terrorists behind the Mumbai attacks be brought to justice," he said.

Loss

Obama not directly criticized pakistan for spreading terrorism in neighbouring countries, Which basically a loss for india.

There was no announcement of India's role in Afghanistan.

We can not consider the below facts as loss to india .Below facts are actual gain to USA from this visit.

In the agenda will be lucrative defence ties. The United States has held more military exercises with India in the past year than any other country, and U.S. firms Boeing and Lockheed Martin Corp are bidding for a $11 billion deal for 126 fighter jet.

Obama is walking a diplomatic tightrope in New Delhi, on the one hand trying to boost diplomatic and business ties with India while on the other ensuring relations with Pakistan and China, nations often at loggerheads with India, stay stable.

U.S. Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade Francisco Sanchez said the United States wanted greater market access to India's infrastructure and energy sectors.

The truth is that having suffered at the midterm polls, President Obama's India visit aimed at repairing the damage from the biggest election reverse for the Democrats in 72 years. The motive of the Obama administration is to befriend the 65 Indian billionaires and use Indian booming economy, to salvage the near sick American economy.

Indian Aeronautical Development Agency is ordering the purchase of 107 F-414 General Electric engines for the Teja fighters for the Indian Air Force at a cost of 850 million dollars. Secret negotiations for the purchase of 126 F-18 Hornet fighters with a price tag of 20 billion dollars was not disclosed. It will bring huge benefit to the US economy when signed.

Valentine day is harming our culture.Favour

Valentine day is western festival if our youth really want to celebrate we can choose any other Indian day for this.

On Valentine's Day People do a show off of their love in public? Which is not acceptable to our society and traditions?

Couples should celebrate it gracefully. Valentine day is propaganda of western capitalist society which want to celebrate all those

days where people can come out to the malls and spend their money.

Against

Valentine day is great day for lovers to celebrate their love. According to history it's a western festival but now it is celebrating in India also. It's a day when lovers express their feeling to each other.

It is a love day when lovers give gifts, red roses, flowers, red stuff toy, greeting cards to each other. But our great Indian police have developed some notoriety for suppressing in Valentine's Day. They inspect hotels, restaurants, coffeehouses, and gift shop on 14th Feb. to prevent couples from giving each other valentines or other present. The police ban the sale of red roses, red stuffed animals, red greeting cards and other red items, report store owner.

One more thing do you know guys Valentine's Day is also called by Saint. Valentine's Day. I feel V's day has nothing 2 do with d western influences on Indian culture. India has successfully survived cultural clashes via Hollywood or 4 that matter the various channels coming u like d M TV, V TV etc. We have been influenced by d west for sure, but at d same time we have retained our values. This itself testifies d fact that sumthin like celebration of V' day can cause least of harm to our enriched heritage. The political parties which issue a ban on d V'DAY every yr.,with due respect to them, should take this aspect into consideration. They should unnerstand tht a day which calls for celebration of a beautiful thing like love can cause no harm 2 d society. The concept of V'day shud not be restrained to sumthing celebrated by lovers. Its way beyond tht...its bout d celebration of d relationship we share with our family , frenz, or for tht matter with d society.I dun see ne reason tht such a thing shud be undesirable

Conclusion

Valentines day is a day like other festivals of year where one can show his/her love to dear ones.People should celebrate it gracefully.It is not affecting our traditions and culture.

Euthanasia: To Do Or Not To Do.Favour

Euthanasia refers to the practice of ending a life in a manner which relieves pain and suffering. According to the House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics, the precise definition of euthanasia is "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering. "In terminally ill patients and in cancer patients who r undergoing tremendous pain.it should be done, coz the pain is really unbearable. And also in people who are terminally ill and who can't afford to pay the high hospital charges, is it not better that euthanasia is done so as to save the misery of the relatives who can't pay high medical bills. And terminally ill cancer patients undergo very severe pain. And we all know how painful the death is .The pain which he undergoes worth living for a few more days, when he'll be dying on his/her bed every moment. Isn't it better to free him from that prison of pain and sufferings if I think about this I feel, it should be allowed.

Against

It can be misused.There must be strict laws pertaining on whom it can be done. And the decision should not be given to only one individual…he can misuse. There must be at least 2 other doctors who should also certify it, other than the treating doctor.

People in favor of Euthanasia argue about the vegetable state of a person who needs the liberation. But the fact is, if Euthanasia is legalized there would not be any check on the circumstances under which a patient was killed/relieved. As we all know too well, how easy it is to buy professionals and their opinion. The intentions of legalizing Euthanasia may be Good but legalizing it would be to legalize killings. History is witness that legalizing killing (remember the Soviet gulag, the Nazi concentration camps, the killing fields of Cambodia) has dreadful consequences. If euthanasia is legalized then suicide must also be. The only difference is the former is assisted and the later is self inflicted.

ON dec 21, 2006.Marico Ricco an Italian doctor disconnected a respirator that was keeping Piergiorgio Welby alive. After Ricco gave him the sedative and switched off the respirator, Webly smilingly said goodbye to his wife and kids and in 45 min he was dead. Webly's right to die was widely publicized in Italy. Here two questions arise: whether a person has the right to sustain life supporting medical treatment The other is whether voluntary euthanasia. is ethically defensible. But before such a law is implemented the must be strong legal framework on this; without any loopholes.

Science is progressing at a massive rate. At any point of time a drug could come into the market which could save a person from a “terminal†� illness. Every person desires to live, but in pain he loses the power to understand and decide about his life and nobody has the right to define someone else's destiny. So euthanasia should definitely find a way out of our dictionaries.

Conclusion

It could be disastrous law for human race so what is required here is to completely understand the process and only after that Euthanasia. Decision should be taken not by the

local doctors. Government should deploy a centralized committee consisting of doctors and law makers and committee should make decision based on circumstances.

Mobile phone a ban or a boon.Favor

Everyone is available to others for 24x7. People say mobiles made life miserable by providing unlimited connectivity but they don't

understand the fact it also provide limited connectivity options like you can switch of the mobiles.

Mobile proved life saver for human beings in many areas related with human health. Mobile proved boon for businesses as well where crucial information is at reach for corporate

decisions. Mobile phones made life easy for people who are going to distant areas for expeditions to be

in touch with rest of world.

Against

Mobile phone is hazard for human life as due to electromagnetic waves many people are suffering health problems of cancer etc.

Mobile phones give unlimited connectivity for human life which made the life miserable for people who have been over using the mobile phones.

Few people claim that user can control mobile usage but in many cases switching of mobile phones considered as unprofessional so people not able to cope up with this requirement and over utilizing the mobiles.

Over utilizing of mobile is ruining social life of people by communicating on phones rather be in touch personally with friends and relatives.

Mobile phones also deterring the traditions because people are more busy on talking on phones on various ceremonies and rituals.

Mobile phones also deterring the office atmosphere as many employees spending more time on mobiles rather on work.

Mobile phones causing accidents because people are using them while driving.

Conclusion

Mobile phone is a great invention but usage of it should be controlled.