ge vs dss (update 2016)

42
Fluid Therapy in GE Shock Vs. DSS (update 2016) Dr. Aung Kyi Wynn Senior consultant

Upload: aung-wynn

Post on 13-Apr-2017

148 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

Fluid Therapy in

GE Shock Vs. DSS(update 2016)

Dr. Aung Kyi WynnSenior consultant Pediatrician

Page 2: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 2

IntroductionHypovolemic shocksDifferent pathophysiologyDifferent management

Page 3: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 3

Scenario4 years old childBody weight 15 kg

Page 4: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 4

GE SHOCK OR CHOLERA SHOCK

Page 5: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 5

PathophysiologySecretory diarrheaExternal fluid loss

(water+electrolytes)-RapidFrom extravascular space ---

dehydration10% of body weight loss S/S

of shock

Page 6: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 6

Principle for GE shock treatment

Fluid out volume = Fluid in volume Rapid Refill

Page 7: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 7

Pre-illness BW estimation

Pre-illness BW = measured BW + 10% of BW 15kg = 13.5kg + 1.5kg

Page 8: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 8

Resuscitation Fluid loading doseR/L or N/S or 5% D/S25% glucose or 10% dextrose

(for hypoglycemia)

Page 9: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 9

Loading dose20 ml/kg within 15 min(300 ml)Second Loading dose if not

improved

Page 10: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 10

T0TAL FLUID PER DAYRMO/ 24 hour

Rehydration, Maintenance, Ongoing loss

Page 11: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 11

Rehydration-Plan C10% loss – 100 ml/kg100 ml * 15 kg = 1500 ml30 ml/kg in first ½ hr (450 ml)70 ml/kg in 2 ½ hr (1050 ml)Without loading dose in 30

ml/kg

Page 12: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 12

MaintenanceHolliday-Segar Method (15kg = 10 +

5 )

1st 10 kg 100ml/kg 1000ml2nd 10 - 20 kg 50ml/kg

250mlOver 20 kg 20ml/kg _ 1250 ml

Page 13: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 13

RateResuscitation loading 80ml/kg/hr

for15 minInitial 60ml/kg/hr for

30 min Later 30ml/kg/hr for

2 1/2hrs Maintenance 3ml/kg/hr for

24hrs

Page 14: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 14

Total RMORehydration 1500 mlMaintenance 1250 ml

2750 mlOngoing loss ?

Page 15: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 15

Ongoing lossFrom intake-output chart10ml/kg (150 ml) for one time of

loose motionORS(old formula) or IV line

Page 16: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 16

At least total 6 bottles of drip for 24 hr

Wide therapeutic indexLow risk for overloading

Page 17: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 17

DSS

Page 18: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 18

Pathophysiology

Immune reaction Increase vascular permeabilityPlasma leakage (directly from vascular

space)-moderate to slowThird space loss (serous cavity-internal

loss)-water+electrolytes+proteinNo dehydrationWill reenter into IVS and excreted by

kidneys in recovery phase (risk of overload)

Page 19: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 19

Loss in 4-6% of body weight (no actual weight loss) – S/S of shock

If coagulation defect +

GI bleeding

External loss

Page 20: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 20

Cause of death overload or bleeding

Death

Page 21: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 21

Principle of fluid therapy in DSS“ Just adequate “ the least fluid

volume to correct shock“ Fresh whole blood “ transfusion

is mandatory if indicated

Page 22: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 22

Loading dose (20ml/kg)-300ml within 15 minutes if BP zero (or)

20 ml/kg/hr if hypotension onlyR/L or N/S for loading , initial

replacement and maintenance Colloid - dextran 40, gelofusine

or ?Plasma 10ml/kg/hr for ongoing loss

Page 23: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 23

Type of fluidInitial stage

Isotonic fluid – R/L , N/S

Page 24: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 24

Later stageTo remain in IVS longer in later period

Osmolality and

Oncotic pressure must be above that of plasma

Page 25: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 25

OsmolalityR/L 273mosm/lNS 308mosm/l5%D/S 560mosm/l1/2strength D/S 406mosm/lDextran 40,70 310mosm/l

Gelofusine 274mosm/l Plasma 285-295mosm/l

Page 26: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 26

Indian J Anaesth. 2009 Oct; 53(5)

Characteristics of some available colloids.Product (Brand name) Conc. (%) Oncotic pressure (mmHg) Initial volume expansion (%) Albumin 25 100–120 200–400Dextran 70 (Macrodex) 6 56–68 120 Dextran 40 (Rheomacrodex) 10 168–191 200 Fluid gelatin (Geloplasma) 3 26–29 70 Plasma 28

Page 27: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 27

RateResuscitation loading 80ml/kg/hr

for15 min (or) 20ml/kg/hr for 1 hour Initial(compensated shock) 10ml/kg/hr for 1 hourLater 6ml/kg/hr for

1hourMaintenance 3ml/kg/hrAdjustment 1-2ml/kg/hr

Page 28: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 28

Replacement4% loss 5% loss 6 % loss

40 ml/kg 50 ml/kg 60 ml/kg

600 ml 750 ml 900 ml

Rate ---20ml/kg+10ml/kg+ 6ml/kg + 3ml/kg= 39ml/kg

Page 29: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 29

MaintenanceSame 1250mlwith crystalloid (N/S , ½ S D/S)

Page 30: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 30

1. Replacement 4% loss 5% loss 6% loss Crystalloid+colloid 600 ml 750 ml 900 ml 2. Maintenance Crystalloid 1250 ml 1250 ml 1250 ml

3. Ongoing loss

Colloid(or) ? ? ? Fresh whole blood ? ? ?

1850 ml 2000 ml 2150 ml 10ml/kg 10ml/kg

Page 31: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 31

Ongoing loss Plasma leakage colloid

10ml/kg/hr Dextran 40

Bleeding fresh whole blood 10ml/kg

Page 32: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 32

OPTIMUM VOLUME1 ½ of maintenance1250 * 1 ½ = 1875 mlLess than 2 times of

maintenance (<2500ml)

Page 33: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 33

BleedingShock not revived when close to

24 hr and more than 1850ml infused (OR)

Condition not improved in spite of stable PCV (OR)

Decreased PCV 20% suddenly

Fresh whole blood

Page 34: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 34

Counter checkRaised Hb G% = FWB ml/kg /6 = 10/6

=1.6 G

If raised PCV >5% wrong decision-risk of overload

Page 35: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 35

If not give FWB timely for bleeding Shock – hypoxia-----------death(or)

Overload

Page 36: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 36

CRITICAL POINT DECISION

(OVERLOAD or BLEEDING)

CAN SAVE LIFE

Page 37: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 37

Complicated casesA-acidosisB-bleedingC-calcium(hypocalcemia)S-sugar(hypoglycemia or

hyperglycemia)

Page 38: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 38

Narrow therapeutic indexType of fluid, rate, duration,

appropriate volume, timely

Page 39: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 39

Fluid Therapy in Cholera shock Vs. DSS

Page 40: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 40

CLOSE MONITORING

Page 41: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 41

ReferencesHandbook for clinical management of dengue –

WHO 2012The Harriet Lane Handbook – the Johns Hopkins

Hospital, twentieth edition,2015 Kalayanarooj Siripen and et al, clinical practice

guidelines of dengue/dengue hemorrhage fever management for Asian Economic Community, 2014

Paediatric Management Guideline – Myanmar Paediatric Society – 2nd edition - 2011

Paediatric Protocols for Malaysian hospitals – Malaysian Paediatric Association – 2nd edition – 2010

Sukanya Matra and Purva Khandelwal, Are all colloids same? How to select the right colloid?, Indian journal of anesthesia 2009 Oct 53(5)

Page 42: GE vs DSS (update 2016)

05/02/2023 AKW 42

THANK YOU