7/29/2019 General Assessment Criteria

1/1

vi

PROGRAM IJAZAH SARJANA MUDA PERGURUAN DENGAN KEPUJIAN(PISMP TESL)

GENERAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

MarkRange

LetterGrade

CGPA Grade Descriptors

90 - 100 A+ 4.00 DistinctionWork of outstanding meritThe work meets all the criteria for distinction noted below in such anexceptional way and with such marked excellence that it deserves thehighest level of recognition.

80 89 A- 3.67

75 79 B+ 3.33High Credit

Work of considerable meritThe work shows all the positive qualities of the levels below, along withoriginality, intellectual inventiveness, and deep interpretativeunderstanding. A comprehensive range of relevant literature is chosenand used appropriately. The work demonstrates critical and independentthinking, incisive argument and an appropriate conclusion based on a fullanalysis. Presentation is excellent in all respects with excellentreferencing and bibliographical skills. Language is accurate and clearand contains very few errors.

70 -74 B 3.00 CreditWork which demonstrates sound relevant knowledgeThe work displays convincing evidence of extensive understanding,thorough study and practice and the capacity to interpret and usematerials flexibly. All major aspects of the question are taken intoaccount with no notable omissions. There is clear evidence of ability tosynthesize ideas, professionally and personally, and to produce criticallyaware material. A good standard of presentation is maintained, witheffective use of headings, quotations, references and bibliographicalskills. Language is intelligible at all times and contains no significanterrors.

65 69 B- 2.67

60-64 C+ 2.33Pass

Adequate/satisfactory workThe work covers the main issues and demonstrates a reasonably soundgrasp of the core/essential knowledge and practice involved and thecapacity to manipulate it competently to meet the main requirements ofthe assignment. The work is conventional, straightforward, and, onbalance presents a generally acceptable argument and conclusion.There is evidence that a core range of relevant literature has beenconsulted. Presentation is generally clear and appropriate with anacceptable range of quotations, references and bibliographical items.Language is generally clear and substantially correct with no serious orsustained miscommunication.

55 59 C 2.00

50-54 C- 1.67

40-49 D+ 1.33 MarginalPass

Overall unacceptable level of workThe work may contain varying levels of basic knowledge, understandingand relationships between points in the topic. However, it also containssome obvious and significant inadequacies in terms of content,relevance, logic and critical judgement/argument. These weaknessesreflect insufficient coverage of and familiarity with a range of relevant

literature. Limited quotations and references are included in the text.Presentation and language are generally faulty with numerous errorswhich impede communication.

30-39 DFail

29 andbelow

E 0.00Low Fail