getting data creators on board with the digital curation agenda
DESCRIPTION
Lessons Learned in Developing Training for Researchers Presentation by Merel Patrick, DaMaRO Project at the DigCurV International Conference; Framing the digital curation curriculum 6-7 May, 2013 Florence, RomeTRANSCRIPT
Research Services
Getting Data Creators On Board with the Digital Curation Agenda
Dr Meriel PatrickDaMaRO Project, University of Oxford
Lessons Learned in Developing Training for Researchers
Research Services
Introduction
University research projects are a key source of digital information with potential long-term value
Researchers can generate or collect vast quantities of data
Rare for any single project to fully exploit the potential of a dataset
Researchers generally recognize the value of their data But don’t always know how best to go about preserving it
Practical barriers may prevent data being made available for re-use
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Research data management work at the University of Oxford
A series of JISC-funded cross-departmental projects over the last four years
Projects have developed: Training resources – electronic and print guidance, plus
face-to-face courses and events
Software tools – an online database service, an institutional data archive, and a metadata catalogue
An institutional policy on research data management All projects informed by requirements gathering, via
interviews and surveys
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
KEY CHALLENGES
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Attitudes to data preservation and sharing
For many researchers, preservation = sharing In a 2011 survey, 85% of researchers said they thought
their data would be of interest to others But less than half this number (41%) said they would
be happy to make their data available Only a third had previously published data 2012 Oxford RDM survey gave slightly more optimistic
results – 30% said they would share all or most of their data, and another 40% would share at least some
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Awareness of where and how to deposit data
Oxford RDM survey asked researchers if they had deposited data in a repository or data store
61% hadn’t
Half of these said they didn’t know of an appropriate place to put it
Almost half (48%) had never heard of ORA, Oxford’s repository for textual research outputs
Researchers also expressed uncertainty about how to prepare their data for long-term preservation/sharing
Concerns include selection, documentation, and licensing
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Concerns about the risks of sharing data
Researchers are worried about the risks of being ‘scooped’
Even post-publication, researchers may want to do further work on the data themselves
Data publication not viewed as on a par with journal papers or monographs
Academic reputation depends heavily on publication record
Pressure from institutions for outputs that count for the REF
Pressure from funding bodies to show good use has been made of grants
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Concerns about the risks of sharing data
Getting Data Creators On Board
In principle, you want material to be available, and I believe in sharing. On the other hand, if you’ve just spent five or ten years collecting a dataset and you haven’t yet milked it for what it’s worth, and you’ve had funding to do the project, then you’re very nervous about handing over that dataset.
– Comment from senior Oxford history researcher
Research Services
Lack of time to prepare or deposit data
Data collected for personal use are often untidy and incomplete, or employ idiosyncratic standards
Preparing data for sharing can be an arduous task This inevitably takes time away from other academic
endeavours – such as traditional publications
Getting Data Creators On Board
Part of my reluctance to share data is that my data is fairly roughly organised, and in various stages of polishedness... so it would be quite a big project to get it all presentable, and I'm not sure in what format I would do it.
– Oxford RDM survey respondent
Research Services
Other barriers to sharing
Ethical issues Consent was not requested from research subjects
Legal issues Data supplied by third parties comes with restrictions
Financial issues Costs of long-term preservation were not built into
project budget
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
TRAINING AS PART OF THE SOLUTION
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Removing barriers to preservation
Digital curation can be promoted by providing researchers with guidance on:
Collecting and organizing data with a view to future sharing
Data documentation
Selection of data for preservation
Data licensing and other IP issues
Where and how to deposit data
Budgeting for data preservation
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Timing of training
Curation cannot be viewed simply as something to be bolted on to the end of the research process
Many barriers can be removed or reduced by planning
So training and guidance need to start early In the planning stages of projects
Near the beginning of researchers’ careers – e.g. second term of graduate studies
Advice also needs to be available on an ongoing basis
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Form and content of training – what researchers want
Researchers are busy people – they want training that’s flexible, concise, and to the point
Ideally multiple formats (e.g. face-to-face and online)
Informal training (e.g. via supervisors) may have benefits
Language needs to be familiar to researchers Even terms like ‘repository’ or ‘data’ may be problematic
Concrete examples help researchers relate abstruse concepts to their own work
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Form and content of training – what researchers want
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Tone of training
Essential that training covers not just the how of curation, but also the why
What makes it worth spending time on this? Funders’ and institutional requirements can be effective
as a means of compelling compliance But they can also lead to weary resentfulness
Training needs to stress the benefits of data preservation, not just the penalties for failing to do it
A major cultural shift is needed – to precipitate a virtuous circle of sharing
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Summary and conclusions
To ensure effective curation of research data, data creators need:
To be engaged from the earliest stages of a project – and on an ongoing basis
Guidance on the practicalities of curation
Encouragement to regard data curation as a worthwhile activity
Training and guidance need to be concise, flexible, practically focused, and in familiar language
Aim of training should be not to threaten, but to inspire
Getting Data Creators On Board
Research Services
Any questions?
Ask now, or email [email protected]
Rights and Re-use
This slideshow was produced by the DaMaRO Project at the University of Oxford. It is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License.
Getting Data Creators On Board