ghorbel i., abid a., moalla s., karra a., ennouri k. · ghorbel i., abid a., moalla s., karra a.,...
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction
Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K.
Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib Bourguiba, Sfax, Tunisie
RÉSUMÉ.
Mots-clés
SUMMARY. Electrical burns are a major cause of bodily harm due to the mechanism and effect of the lesions. This prompts us to studythese lesions and their management in order to reduce the morbidity caused by this type of accident. We conducted a retrospective descriptiveobservational study of patients hospitalized for electrical burns. This study includes 23 patients. The average age was 25.74 years. Themost common occurrence was a domestic accident in 13 cases (56.5%), a work accident in 8 cases (34.8%), and a road traffic accident in2 cases (8.7%). Fasciotomy was performed on six patients: five had high voltage injuries. Necrosis excision was performed at 8.26 days ±5.55 days. Seven amputations were performed including 6 at the upper limb. Twenty flaps were used on 12 patients. Locoregional flapswere performed for 15 zones, and distant flaps as a solution in the event of locoregional flap failure. Five cases had immediate reconstructionbecause of exposure of noble elements, 3 showing necrosis of the flap. The average healing time was 45 days. Seven patients who underwenta reconstruction by flap healed after this period. The main results of the study show that conventional emergency decompression does notappear to reduce the amputation rate, the use of local and locoregional flaps in the initial phase (<21 days) carries a significant risk ofsuffering and necrosis, and that antithrombotic prevention or the use of flaps does not seem to have an impact on healing delays.
Keywords: burns, electrical, fasciotomy, antithrombotic treatment, flap, healing time
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018
Fig.1
Tableau II
Tableau III
Circonstance Voltage Total
Accident domestiqueAccident de travail Accident de la routeTotal
Patient et méthodes
Résultats
Ta-bleau I
Tableau I
Fig. 1
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018
Discussion
.
.
Date de l’excision (jours) Type de Lambeau Date (jour) Évolution Lambeaux/patient5
301056
277
85
69
Tableau II
Voltage Le Traitement A-T* Délai de cicatrisation (jour) Test exact de Fisher(p<0.05)
BasHautTotal
Tableau III
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018
Conclusion
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
Conflit d’intérêt.
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018