gordan zakon za policija
DESCRIPTION
Gordan Zakon Za PolicijaTRANSCRIPT
-
. - ,
, /
-
1. - ?
.
( ),
-
( -).1 ()
,
,
, ,
( )
. ,
( , ),
, , ,
,
.2
1 : , ,, .114/06 6/09.
: . /. ,
, : ,
. 1, , , 2006, . 13-27. 2 (www.cpt.coe.int),
(http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/186589.pdf),
(www.mhc.mk),
(http://www.pravicnosudenje.org.mk),
(http://www.ombudsman.mk/ombudsman/upload/NPM-dokumenti/2012/Godisen%20izvestaj-NPM.pdf),
(www.transparentnost-mk.org.mk),
( : www.justice.gov.mk)
-
,
,
. ()
.
( !),3
, ,
.
,
.4
,5
.
,6 , ,
3 ,
.
, , .
, , (. 26),
,
(. 12) . ,
.
4
, . : V. Evan / K. Lidstone,
The Investigation on Crime: A Guide to Police Powers, Butterworths, 1996; R. Crawshaw / B. Devlin /
Williamson, Human Rights and Policing, Kluwer Law, The Hague, 1998; A. Ashworth, The Criminal
Process, Second Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998. P. Ozin/ H. Norton /P. Spivey, PACE: A
Practical Guide to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Blackstone's Practical Policing), Second
Ed. Oxford, 2010.
5 ,
, , , .
,
, ! 6 2000 . (
'' .129/2000) 2009 . (
'' .76/09), ,
.
.
-
.7 ,
.
, -
, ,
.
,
, , ,
.
!
,
(. 34 )!!,
(. 19 23 ).8
, ,
, ,
, !
2. 9
2010 .10
,
. ,
,
7 2 , ,
, ...
,
!!. 8
.
,
( , .).
, ,
. ,
.
, ,
(
, , .).
9 : , 150/10. 10
: G. Buarovska/ G. Kalajdiev, Reform of the
Criminal Procedure in the Republic of Macedonia, Iustinianus Primus Law Review, No.1, Spring 2010
(www.law-review.mk); . / . , ,
,
/, 2009, 13.
-
,
,11
-
(
, ),12
, .
,
, ,
,
. , ,
,
,
.13
,
.
,
!14
,
.
, . ,
11
: . /. /. , , ,
(), . 1, 2008; . ,
,
, 2010; . /. , ,
, , .2, 2009, . 121-154; A. Perrodet, The public prosecutor, o: M. Dlmas-Marty /J. Spencer (Eds.), European Criminal Procedures,
. 415; E. Mathias, The balance of powers between the police and the public prosecutor, o: European
Criminal Procedures, . 459, 461; J.-M. Jehle /M. Wade (Eds.), Coping with Overloaded Criminal
Justice Systems-The Rise of Prosecutorial Power across Europe, Gttingen, 2005. 12
, ,
,
, . . ,
,
.
()
. 4
. 14
,
(. 196 ). 13
.
,
. 14
.
-
,
,
.
. , 14
( 36 )
,15
,
(. 8
/ . 18 ).16
, ,
;
, ,
,
,
,
. ,
(
).17
.
,
, ,
, . ,
.
,
.
(. 49 ).
( 47
15
,
, . 16
/
(. 41, 46, 51, 283 ). : .
/. , ,
, , .2, 2009, . 121. 17
,
( )
.
-
).
. , , ,
, .18
3.
,
.
,
.
,
!19
, 2009 .
.20
;
;
, .
2010
(Directive 2010/64/EU of 20 October 2010 on the
right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings) 2012
(Directive
2012/13/EU of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings).
2011
(Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right
18
, , -
, -
.
. . 19
:
( www.ener.gov.mk).
. . ,
, ,
, , ,
,
. 20
: Council of the European Union, Resolution of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening
procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings, OJ C 295/1, :
http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:6:2009:295:0001:0003:EN:pdf.
-
ofaccess to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and on the right to communicate upon
arrest, Brussels, 8.6.2011, COM(2011).21
4.
,
, .
.
( )
(
) ,
( )
.
, .
4.1. . ( )
,
. ( !)
!
,
(
, ). . 12
-
( ),
, ,
.
, .. .
, ,
21
: Cape, E., Hodgson, J., Prakken, T. and Spronken, T., Suspects
in Europe, Antwerp: Intersentia, 2007; Cape, E., Namoradze, Z., Smith, R. and Spronken, T., Effective
Criminal Defence in Europe, Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010 (
http://www.soros.org/sites/default/files/criminal-defence-europe-summary.pdf); Klip, A., European
Criminal Law, Antwerp: Intersentia, 2012; Cape, . / Namoradze, Z. (Eds.), Effective Criminal Defence in
Eastern Europe, 2012 ( http://www.soros.org/sites/default/files/criminal-defence-
20120604.pdf); Open Society Foundations, Improving Pretrial Justice: The Roles of Lawyers and
Paralegals, New York: Open Society Foundations, 2012; Hodgson, J., Safeguarding Suspects Rights in
Europe: A Comparative Perspective, New Criminal Law Review 14 (4), 2011, 611665; Jimeno-Bulnes,
M., Towards Common Standards on Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings in
the EU?, CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe Series, 2010, : www.ceps.eu; The Carloway
Review: Report and Recommendations, Edinburgh: Carloway Review, 2011, :
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/CarlowayReview
-
(. 279 ).22
,
( )23
-
.
( )
, ,
.24
,
, , .
de facto
,
( )
, . 12 . 158
.
24 ,
.25
,
.26
,
.
, ,
22
(. 285 ). 23
, -
. 2004 . 368
,
2 . : ,
., , , 2004, . 44. 24
, . 12
,
, . 25
. 12 . 159 . 26
, Application No:4922/04,
08-10-2009 (
http://www.pravda.gov.mk/txt/presudi/mak/Lazorovski_mak.pdf).
-
4 ,
,
.27
, . 279 . 4
,
!
.
, ,
/
.
4.2. .
, ,
, . . 34
: ,
( . 13 , ),
,
, ,
,
, ,
,
.28
,
()
.29
, !
,
(.. , letter of rights),
.30
. ,
(, , , . ),
(, ,
, .31
, ,
27
,
. 28
: . ,
, Balkan Yearbook of Human Rights 2002, . 433-455; . ,
,
, , 2007, . 22-39. 29
Directive 2012/13/EU. 30
: T. Spronken, EUWide Letter of Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Towards Best Practice, 2010,
http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?did=24161 31
,
, (,
, , , , ), .
, .
-
, ,
.32
,
.33
,
, , . ,
,
.34
. ,
,
, .
,
, . 12
, .35
4.3. . -
(
), , , ! ,
.36
, , (
69 2),37
,
,
,
. ,
,
, .
, ,
, ,
32
: S. Trechsel, Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005; P.
van Dijk/ G. J. H. Hoof, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Kluwer, 1998. 33
: Cape, . / Namoradze, Z. (Eds.), Effective Criminal Defence in Eastern Europe, 2012. 34
(: V. Bayer, Komentar Zakona o krivicnom postupku, Informator, Zagreb, _) 35
() ,
, ,
, . 36
K
, j
, .
: 49.
. 7 (supra). 37
. 18 : Report to the Government of the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the visit to "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" carried out
by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment (CPT) from 21 September to 1 October 2010, www.cpt.coe.int
-
. ,
5% ,
, ,
!38
,
50 % ,
.39
,
,
.40
,
,
24/7.41
,
( ).
/
, .
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
.42
38
,
(http://www.ombudsman.mk/ombudsman/upload/NPM-
dokumenti/2012/Godisen%20izvestaj-NPM.pdf 39
: Cape, E., Namoradze, Z., Smith, R. and Spronken, T., Effective Criminal Defence in Europe,
Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010. 40
() , ,
(
ex officio pro bono). 41
: Report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert group meeting on strengthening access to legal aid in criminal justice systems held in Vienna from 16 to 18 November 2011
http://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/DRAFT_report_IEGM_legal_aid.web.pdf 42
: Dayanan v. Tyrkey, Judgment of 13 October, 2009, No. 7377/03, para. 32.
-
!43
4.4. ,
, . 34
.
.44
, ,
, .,
/ .45
.
..
. ,
, /
, .
, . de facto
incommunicado
.
4.5.
, 69 . 3 :
-
.
. 160 . 6 :
.
, .
-
, .46
, , ,
,
43
Pavlenko v. Russia, Judgment of 1 April, 2010, No. 42371/02, para. 108-114,
,
, . 44
, . 69 . 3
,
- -
. . 161 . 5
, ,
, - ; 45
. /. 46
.
.
-
,
,
, 3
, .
,
j j
. ,
j
. , , ,
,
, , j
.47
,
.48
4.6. .
j
j j
j. :
( / j)
; ;
;
;
; j , .
j
,
, j .49
161 . 4
, ( )
6
. ( )
. K (/)
j , j.
50
, (. 207 . 1).
47
: , . 38. 48
. 49
, . 39. 50
j j
. j
. , . 36.
-
(. 160 . 3 . 279 . 8 ).
, - (. 160 . 2 ).
51 ,
- . , , -.
161 . 4
.
j , -
, j .52
,
(. 175-180 ).
4.7.
.
,
,
(. 34
. 69 ). .
! . 10 .
,
.
,
(Directive 2010/64/EU of 20 October 2010 on the right to
interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings).53
51
. 52
j .
, j .
. 37
( ,
).
, . K, ,
j . 53
: . Cape/ Z. Namoradze (supra).