green it - topic thinking 0922

Upload: achi-chen

Post on 10-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    1/15

    Green signal and Its Impact on Price Premium and Product Evaluation

    - Signaling Theory

    1. Background

    (1)Study purpose

    This study evaluates the extent to which the value of IT product can be enhanced by

    Green image and, more specifically, how environmental message appeals and source

    credibility play a role in value formation. Drawing theories from Information systems,

    marketing and psychology, this study expect to demonstrate that Green signal can add the

    value to the quality of products, and show how this benefit accrues to customers from the

    adoption of Green IT. The value of the Green Signal is exhibited in premium prices

    customers are willing to pay for the Green IT.

    (2)Study background

    Recent years have seen increased attention being given to the issue of adopting Green IT

    in the organizations because of legislation, customer pressure and social responsibility.

    Many studies have found that Green IT has gathered great importance as a competitiveforce and a tool for competitive advantage and sustainable development. Therefore, what

    the role of Green IT plays in organizations and how to use Green IT to improve

    competition become a central place in the fields of management and Information Systems

    nowadays. Despite the importance of the Green IT in the organizations, most of studies

    focus only on organizational aspect. Little is known, however, about customers aspect

    and how organizations can provide benefits by adopting Green IT to customers.

    Customers are vital part of organization. Without considering customers perspective may

    result in lacking of compressive view of the impact of Green IT on organizations.

    Therefore, this study emphasizes on customers perspective about how they receive

    Green IT signals and how they evaluate product quality of Green IT.

    (3) Research Questions:

    1. What kind of signals that consumers appreciate and look for when going through the

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    2/15

    purchasing process?

    So this could perhaps be a two-phased study

    a qualitative one perhaps a protocol analysis

    a quantitative experiment).

    2. Does producing signal compromise your ability to deliver the product/service that is

    consistent with signal?

    3. It might be interesting to compare the impact of eco-branding of products/services

    and eco-compliance of organizational processes. Which is a better signal? Does one

    override the effects of the other?

    4. What impact does cost of the signal have on the consumer?

    2. Theoretical Background

    Prior studies have found that Green IT can bring several benefits for companies,

    including generating cost saving, promoting innovation, premium pricing, enhancing the

    brand image and differentiating from competitors(Orsato 2006). If companies have

    adopted suitable strategies, these benefits may create competitive advantage. For better

    understand these strategies, this study based on Orsatos Generic Competitive

    Environmental Strategies focuses on two strategies to develop our research model.(1)Generic competitive environmental strategies

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    3/15

    Strategy 2: Beyond Compliance Leadership

    Two key points of beyond compliance leadership are listed bellow:

    1. Acknowledgement from public and customer for their efforts

    2. Indirect influence on the image of a firm and eventually affect the shopping behaviorof consumers

    3. improved the image consumers and shareholders have about their operations.

    Strategy 3: Eco-Branding

    Firms that intend to generate competitive advantage from strategies based on eco-

    branding need to observe three basic pre-requisites:

    1. consumers must be willing to pay for the costs of ecological differentiation;

    Consumers need to perceive a clear benefit for their purchase

    2. reliable information about product's environmental performance must be available to

    the consumer;

    Eco-Lable, such as Energy Star, ISO 14000 and KRAV

    3. the differentiation should be difficult to be imitated by competitors.

    Strategy 2 tells us the importance of acknowledgement of Green image from customers.

    This implies that whether the Green image signals can correctly and clearly disseminate

    to customers and, in turn, let customers recognize the companies effort on Green IT.Therefore, the first variable this study will explore is Environmental Signals (Message

    appeals). The second variable is Perceived Quality, which represents the reorganization

    of companies effort on Green IT from customers.

    Strategy 3 provides the insights of how customers will react - willing to pay more and

    product evaluation. Thus, this study will adopt these two variables as well. Furthermore,

    the reliable information is another key to create strategy 3. Eco-Lable may be a good

    indicator of credible source. Hence, Source Credibility will be another variable in our

    model.

    In sum, five variables are included in our research model : Environmental Signals

    (Message appeals), Perceived Quality, willing to pay more, product evaluation and

    Source Credibility.

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    4/15

    (2) Signaling theory

    Signaling theory is the fundamental concept behind our research model. Signaling is theidea that one party (termed the agent) conveys some meaningful information about itself

    to another party (the principal). For example, in Michael Spence's job-market signaling

    model, (potential) employees send a signal about their ability level to the employer by

    acquiring certain education credentials. The informational value of the credential comes

    from the fact that the employer assumes it is positively correlated with having greater

    ability. Based on Signaling theory, this study tries to answer few questions below:

    How much time, energy, or money should the sender (agent) spend on sending the

    signal?

    How can the receiver (the principal, who is usually the buyer in the transaction)

    trust the signal to be an honest declaration of information?

    Assuming there is a signaling equilibrium under which the sender signals honestly

    and the receiver trusts that information, under what circumstances will that

    equilibrium break down?

    (3)Literature

    Environmental Signals (Message appeals): (Chang 2004; Goodwin and Etgar

    1980)

    Perceived Quality:(Dodds, Monroe, and Grewal 1991; Dsouza, Taghian, and

    Khosla 2007; Grewal et al. 1998)

    Willing to pay more:(Chan 2001; Dsouza et al. 2007; Homburg, Koschate, and

    Hoyer 2005; Laroche, Bergeron, and Barbaro-Forleo 2001; Walter, Gupta, and

    Su 2006)

    Product evaluation:(Dsouza et al. 2007; Monroe and Chapman 1987) Source Credibility: (D'Souza et al. 2007)

    Environmental Consciousness: (Junaedi 2007) (Chan 2001)

    Signaling Theory: (Boulding and Kirmani 1993; Hoxmeier 2000; Levy and

    Lazarovich-Porat 1995)

    Competitive environmental strategies: (Orsato 2006)

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    5/15

    3. Structure and Experimental Design

    (1) Research Structure

    Independent variables: Message signals and Source Credibility

    Moderator: Environmental Consciousness

    Dependent Variables: Product Evaluation, Perceive Quality and Willingness to

    pay more

    (2)Experimental Design

    2 X 3

    Environmental Signals (Message Appeals)

    Environmental Appeal( External Environment)

    Benefits/Cost Appeal(User-Side)

    Environmental Appeal +Benefits/Cost Appeal

    SourceCredibility

    Certification:Yes

    Certification:No

    Message Signals

    Source Credibility

    Product Evaluation

    Perceived Quality

    Willingness to pay more

    Environmental Consciousness

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    6/15

    (3) Measurement

    Willing to pay more

    1. (Homburg et al. 2005)

    We measured WTP with an open-ended question. Participants were asked the price that

    they would be willing to pay for the restaurant visit. This type of measure has been

    widely used in other studies in this area (e.g., Cameron and James 1987; Krishna 1991).

    Table 2 provides the means of the WTP measures for the eight scenarios.(Homburg et al.

    2005)

    2. (Dsouza et al. 2007)

    I prefer to purchase an environmentally safe product even if it is somewhat more

    expensive.

    I prefer to purchase an environmentally safe product even if it is somewhat lower in

    quality.

    3.(Laroche et al. 2001)

    Environment Consciousness

    1. (Chan 2001)

    It frightens me to think that much of the food I eat is contaminated with

    pesticides.

    It genuinely infuriates me to think that the government doesn't do more to help

    control pollution of the environment.

    I become incensed when I think about the harm being done to plant and animal life

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    7/15

    by pollution.

    When I think of the ways industries are causing pollution, I get frustrated and angry.

    The whole pollution issue has never upset me too much since I feel it's some what

    overrated.

    2. (Mostafa 2006)

    I know that I buy products and packages that are environmentally safe.

    I know more about recycling than the average person.

    I know how to select products and packages that reduce the amount of waste

    ending up in landfills.

    I understand the environmental phrases and symbols on product package.

    I am very knowledgeable about environmental issues

    Perceived Quality

    (Dodds et al. 1991)

    1. The likelihood that the product would be reliable is: (very high to very low)

    2. The workmanship of product would be: (very high lo very low).

    3.. This product should be of: (very good quality to very low quality)

    4. The likelihood that this product is dependable is: (very high to very low)

    5. This product would seem to be durable (strongly agree to strongly disagree)

    Perceived Value(Dodds et al. 1991)

    1. This product is a: (very good value for the money to very poor value for the

    money)

    2. At the price shown the product is: (very economical lo very un-economical)

    3. The product is considered to be a good buy {strongly agree to strongly disagree)

    4. The price shown for the product is: (very acceptable to very unacceptable)

    5. This product appears to be a bargain (strongly agree to strongly disagree)

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    8/15

    4. Research Scenario

    Apple iMac as an example ( I will think about a fiction product in our research but now,

    in order to image the whole scenario easier, I use iMac as an example)

    Please image that you are going to buy a new desktop. There are three desktops that you

    like very much. So, you have to compare these three desktops now and make sure which

    one is what you need. Assume that these three desktops all have similar features and

    functions, please how much do you think for these three desktop may have?

    Price:

    Now, one of them has following appeal(s) in its official website:

    Scenario 1: Environmental appeal and no Certification

    Eliminating Toxic Substances

    Its what iMac doesnt have that makes it more environmentally friendly. Its free

    of many harmful toxins, including mercury, arsenic, BFRs, and PVC.

    Scenarios 2: Environmental appeal and Certification

    Eliminating Toxic Substances

    Its what iMac doesnt have that makes it

    more environmentally friendly. Its free of

    many harmful toxins, including mercury,

    arsenic, BFRs, and PVC.

    iMac is designed to be energy

    efficient right out of the box. It has

    even earned the EPAs ENERGY STAR

    qualification for its low power

    consumption.

    Scenarios 3: User appeal and no Certification

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    9/15

    Using our new iMac, you can save 15% of payment of electric bill by reducing the

    amount of power wasted.

    Scenarios 4: User appeal and Certification

    Using our new iMac, you can save 15% of

    payment of electric bill by reducing the

    amount of power wasted.

    iMac isdesigned to be energy efficient rightout of the box. It has even earnedthe EPAs ENERGY STAR qualificationfor its low power consumption.

    Scenarios 5: Environmental and User appeal, but no Certification

    Using our new iMac, you can save 15% of

    payment of electric bill by reducing the

    amount of power wasted.

    Eliminating ToxicSubstances

    Its what iMac doesnt have that

    makes it more environmentally

    friendly. Its free of many harmful

    toxins, including mercury, arsenic,

    BFRs, and PVC.

    15%

    Energy Save

    15%Energy Save

    15%Energy Save

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    10/15

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    11/15

    Appendix

    (Laroche et al. 2001)

    Appendix 2

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    12/15

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    13/15

    Ecolabes

    The Mobius Loop indicates that a product can be recycled. Each arrow

    represents an aspect of a successful recycling programme: collection, remanufacturing

    into a new product, and finally purchase by the consumer. Please note that it does not

    necessarily mean that the object has been recycled.

    Common labels include yellow EnergyGuide tags found in North America as part of

    theEnergy Starprogram, European Union energy labels, and theEnergy Saving

    Recommended logo[8]administrated by the Energy Saving Trust in the United Kingdom.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_energy_labelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Saving_Recommendedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Saving_Recommendedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Saving_Recommendedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecolabel#cite_note-7http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecolabel#cite_note-7http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Saving_Trusthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_energy_labelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Saving_Recommendedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Saving_Recommendedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecolabel#cite_note-7http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Saving_Trust
  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    14/15

    Reference

    Boulding, W. and A. Kirmani (1993), "A consumer-side experimental examination of

    signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality?,"Journal of

    Consumer Research, 20 (1), 111-23.

    Chan, R. Y. K. (2001), "Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior,"

    Psychology and Marketing, 18 (4), 389-413.

    Chang, C. (2004), "How Mood and Ad-self-congruency Affect the Relative Influence of

    Hedonic Ad Appeals and Utilitarian Ad Appeals on Product Evaluations,"Advances in

    Consumer Research, 31.

    D'Souza, C., M. Taghian, P. Lamb, and R. Peretiatko (2007), "Green decisions:

    demographics and consumer understanding of environmental labels,"InternationalJournal of Consumer Studies, 31 (4), 371-76.

    Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal (1991), "Effects of price, brand, and store

    information on buyers' product evaluations,"Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (3), 307-

    19.

    Dsouza, C., M. Taghian, and R. Khosla (2007), "Examination of environmental beliefs

    and its impact on the influence of price, quality and demographic characteristics with

    respect to green purchase intention,"Journal of Targeting, 15 (2), 69-78.

    Goodwin, S. and M. Etgar (1980), "An experimental investigation of comparative

    advertising: Impact of message appeal, information load, and utility of product class,"

    Journal of Marketing Research, 187-202.

    Grewal, D., R. Krishnan, J. Baker, and N. Borin (1998), "The effect of store name, brand

    name and price discounts on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions,"Journal of

    Retailing, 74 (3), 331-52.

    Homburg, C., N. Koschate, and W. D. Hoyer (2005), "Do satisfied customers really pay

    more? A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay,"

    Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 84-96.

    Hoxmeier, J. A. (2000), "Software preannouncements and their impact on customersperceptions and vendor reputation,"Journal of Management Information Systems, 17 (1),

    115-39.

    Junaedi, M. F. Shellyana (2007), "The roles of consumer's knowledge and emotions in

    ecological issues," Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 9 (1), 81-99.

    Laroche, M., J. Bergeron, and G. Barbaro-Forleo (2001), "Targeting consumers who are

  • 8/8/2019 Green IT - Topic Thinking 0922

    15/15

    willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products,"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER

    MARKETING, 18 (6), 503-20.

    Levy, H. and E. Lazarovich-Porat (1995), "Signaling theory and risk perception: An

    experimental study,"Journal of Economics and Business, 47 (1), 39-56.Monroe, K. B. and J. D. Chapman (1987), "Framing effects on buyers subjective product

    evaluations,"Advances in Consumer Research, 14 (1), 193-97.

    Mostafa, Mohamed M. (2006), "Antecedents of Egyptian Consumers' Green Purchase

    Intentions: A Hierarchical Multivariate Regression Model,"Journal of International

    Consumer Marketing, 19 (2), 97-126.

    Orsato, R. J. (2006), "Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be

    green?," California Management Review, 48 (2), 127.

    Walter, Z., A. Gupta, and B. C. Su (2006), "The sources of on-line price dispersion across

    product types: An integrative view of on-line search costs and price premiums,"

    International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11 (1), 37-62.