group decision making chapter 9 vohra

Upload: mkkaran90

Post on 02-Jun-2018

231 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    1/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-1

    Essentials of

    Organizational Behavior, 10/e

    Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A. Judge

    Chapter 8

    Foundations of GroupBehavior

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    2/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-2

    After studying this chapter, youshould be able to:

    1. Define groupand differentiate between types ofgroups.

    2. Identify the five stages of group development.

    3. List and define the five properties of groups.4. Demonstrate how norms and status exert influence

    on an individuals behavior.

    5. Contrast the strengths and weaknesses of group

    decision making.6. Evaluate evidence for cultural differences in group

    status and social loafing as well as the effects ofdiversity in groups.

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    3/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-3

    Groups

    Two or more individuals, interactingand interdependent, who cometogether to achieve particular

    objectives

    Formal Defined by the organizations structure

    Informal Neither formally structured nor organizationally

    determined

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    4/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-4

    Four Types of Groups

    Formal Groups

    Commanddeterminedby the organization chart

    Taskworking togetherto complete a job task

    Informal Groups

    Interestaffiliate toattain a specific objective

    of shared interest

    Friendshipmembershave one or morecommon characteristics

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    5/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-5

    Why Do People Join Groups?

    Security

    Status

    Self-esteemAffiliation

    Power

    Goal achievement

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    6/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-6

    The Five-Stage Modelof Group Development

    1

    Forming:

    Uncertainty about purpose, structure, and leadership

    2

    Storming:

    Intragroup conflict as members resist constraints

    3

    Norming:

    Group is cohesive with strong group identity

    4

    Performing:

    Group fully functional and working toward goals

    5

    Adjourning:

    For temporary groups: breaking up

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    7/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-7

    Key Points & Critiqueof Five-Stage Model

    Group Effectiveness: Generally groups are more effective as they progress

    Reasons for this are complex

    Group Conflict: Some groups need conflict, most productive in Stage II

    Blurred Stages: Stages not always sequential Multiple stages may be taken simultaneously

    May regress a stage

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    8/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-8

    Group Properties

    Roles

    Norms Status

    Size

    Cohesiveness

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    9/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-9

    Group Property 1: Roles

    The set of expected behavior patterns thatare attributed to occupying a given position

    in a social unit

    Role Identityroles associated attitudes and behaviors

    Role Perceptionour view of how were supposed toact in a given situation

    Role Expectationshow others believe you should actin a given situation

    Role Conflictconflict experienced when multiple rolesare incompatible

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    10/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-10

    Group Property 2: Norms

    Acceptable standards of behavior within agroup that are shared by the groups

    members

    Powerful means of

    influencing behavior Performance,

    appearance, socialengagement and

    resource allocation

    Norms

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    11/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-11

    Lessons fromthe Hawthorne Studies

    Productivity increased because groupswere paid attention to by the observers

    not because of changes in environment

    Workers in groups do not maximizeindividual economic rewards

    Group standards are set and enforced bythe group itself

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    12/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-12

    Conformity

    Reference Groups: Groups in which a person is aware of other members,

    defines self as a member, believes group members tobe significant

    Individuals try to conform to norms of these groups asthey desire acceptance of the group

    Asch Studies

    Members desire to avoid being visibly different Members with differing opinions feel extensive

    pressure to align with others

    Level of conformity has declined since 1950s

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    13/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-13

    Deviant Workplace Behavior

    Voluntary behavior that violates significantorganizational norms and, in doing so,

    threatens the well-being of the organization

    or its members

    Is likely to flourish when:

    Supported by group norms People are in groups

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    14/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-14

    Group Property 3: Status

    A socially defined position or rank given togroups or group members by others

    Determined by: The powera person wields over others

    A persons abilityto contribute to a groups goals

    An individuals personal characteristics

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    15/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-15

    Impact of Status

    High-status members: Often have more freedom to deviate from norms

    Are better able to resist conformity pressures

    Interaction among members of groupsis influenced by status High status people are more assertive

    Low status members may not participate

    Group creativity may suffer

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    16/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-16

    Group Property 4: Size

    Smaller groups are faster at completingtasksmembers perform better

    Large groups are consistently better atproblem solving

    Social Loafing - tendency to expend less

    effort working in a group than as anindividual

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    17/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-17

    Social Loafing

    Causes:

    Equity theoryunequaldistribution of work

    Dispersion ofresponsibilityclouds therelationship betweenindividual inputs and

    group output

    Prevention:

    Set group goals

    Increase inter-group

    competition Engage in peer evaluation

    Distribute group rewardsbased on members

    individual contributions

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    18/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-18

    Group Property 5:Cohesiveness

    The degree to whichmembers of the group areattracted to each other and

    motivated to stay in thegroup

    Performance-related norms are the

    moderating variable forproductivity and cohesiveness

    High cohesiveness with high normsgives higher productivity

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    19/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-19

    Encouraging Cohesiveness

    1. Make the group smaller

    2. Encourage agreement with group goals

    3. Increase the time spent together

    4. Increase the status and perceived difficultyof group membership

    5. Stimulate competition with other groups

    6. Give rewards to the group rather than toindividual members

    7. Physically isolate the group

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    20/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-20

    Group Decision Making

    Strengths

    Generate more completeinformation andknowledge

    Increased diversity ofviews(heterogenity)

    Increased acceptance ofa solution

    Weaknesses

    Takes longer

    Conformity pressures

    Discussions can bedominated by one or afew members

    Ambiguous responsibilityfor the final outcome

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    21/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-21

    Effectiveness & Efficiency

    Effectiveness: Accuracygroup is better than average individual but

    worse than most accurate group member

    Speedindividuals are faster

    Creativitygroups are better

    Degree of Acceptancegroups are better

    Efficiency: Groups are generally less efficient

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    22/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-22

    Groupthink Symptoms

    A deterioration of individuals mentalefficiency, reality testing, and moral

    judgments as a result of group pressures

    Occurs when members:

    Rationalize away resistance to assumptions

    Pressure doubters to support the majority

    Doubters keep silent/minimize their misgivings Illusion of unanimity -Interprets silence as ayes

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    23/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-23

    MinimizingGroupthink

    Limit group size (10)

    Encourage group leaders

    to actively seek inputfrom all members andavoid expressing their

    own opinions Appoint a devils

    advocate

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    24/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-24

    Groupshift

    Difference bw group and indvidual decisions

    Group discussions lead members to assume new,more extreme, positions

    Groups often take positions of greater risk

    May be due to diffused responsibility

    Occurs also when people want to demonstrate

    how different they are from the group(politicians)

    From this understand that the group decisionsexaggerate the initial position of individuals

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    25/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-25

    Group Decision-MakingTechniques

    Interacting groups meet face-to-face andrely on verbal and non-verbal interactions to

    communicate

    Brainstorming Generates a list of creative alternatives

    Problem: production blocking

    Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Restricts discussion during the decision-making

    process to encourage independent thinking

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    26/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-26

    Global Implications

    Cultural differences affect the importance,display, and derivation of status.

    Social loafing occurs mostly in individualisticcultures motivated by self-interest.

    Diversity leads to greater conflict but thesurface-level recognition may makemembers more open-minded andacceptingleading to better decisions.

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    27/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-27

    Implications for Managers

    Positive relationship between roleperception and performance evaluation

    Group norms can affect individualperformance either positively or negatively

    Status inequities adversely impactproductivity and performance

    Group size impacts effectiveness

    Cohesiveness can influence productivity

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    28/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-28

    Keep in Mind

    Group norms, roles, and identities havepowerful affects on individual behavior

    Conformity can be a problem: have leadersminimize initial inputs

    Group decision making is not always betterthan individual decision making

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    29/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-29

    Summary

    1. Defined groupand differentiated between types ofgroups.

    2. Identified the five stages of group development.

    3. Listed and defined the five properties of groups.

    4. Demonstrated how norms and status exert influence onan individuals behavior.

    5. Contrasted the strengths and weaknesses of groupdecision making.

    6. Evaluated evidence for cultural differences in groupstatus and social loafing as well as the effects ofdiversity in groups.

  • 8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra

    30/30

    Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-30

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may bereproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,

    in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior

    written permission of the publisher. Printed in theUnited States of America.