group decision making chapter 9 vohra
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
1/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-1
Essentials of
Organizational Behavior, 10/e
Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A. Judge
Chapter 8
Foundations of GroupBehavior
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
2/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-2
After studying this chapter, youshould be able to:
1. Define groupand differentiate between types ofgroups.
2. Identify the five stages of group development.
3. List and define the five properties of groups.4. Demonstrate how norms and status exert influence
on an individuals behavior.
5. Contrast the strengths and weaknesses of group
decision making.6. Evaluate evidence for cultural differences in group
status and social loafing as well as the effects ofdiversity in groups.
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
3/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-3
Groups
Two or more individuals, interactingand interdependent, who cometogether to achieve particular
objectives
Formal Defined by the organizations structure
Informal Neither formally structured nor organizationally
determined
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
4/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-4
Four Types of Groups
Formal Groups
Commanddeterminedby the organization chart
Taskworking togetherto complete a job task
Informal Groups
Interestaffiliate toattain a specific objective
of shared interest
Friendshipmembershave one or morecommon characteristics
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
5/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-5
Why Do People Join Groups?
Security
Status
Self-esteemAffiliation
Power
Goal achievement
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
6/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-6
The Five-Stage Modelof Group Development
1
Forming:
Uncertainty about purpose, structure, and leadership
2
Storming:
Intragroup conflict as members resist constraints
3
Norming:
Group is cohesive with strong group identity
4
Performing:
Group fully functional and working toward goals
5
Adjourning:
For temporary groups: breaking up
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
7/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-7
Key Points & Critiqueof Five-Stage Model
Group Effectiveness: Generally groups are more effective as they progress
Reasons for this are complex
Group Conflict: Some groups need conflict, most productive in Stage II
Blurred Stages: Stages not always sequential Multiple stages may be taken simultaneously
May regress a stage
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
8/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-8
Group Properties
Roles
Norms Status
Size
Cohesiveness
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
9/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-9
Group Property 1: Roles
The set of expected behavior patterns thatare attributed to occupying a given position
in a social unit
Role Identityroles associated attitudes and behaviors
Role Perceptionour view of how were supposed toact in a given situation
Role Expectationshow others believe you should actin a given situation
Role Conflictconflict experienced when multiple rolesare incompatible
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
10/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-10
Group Property 2: Norms
Acceptable standards of behavior within agroup that are shared by the groups
members
Powerful means of
influencing behavior Performance,
appearance, socialengagement and
resource allocation
Norms
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
11/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-11
Lessons fromthe Hawthorne Studies
Productivity increased because groupswere paid attention to by the observers
not because of changes in environment
Workers in groups do not maximizeindividual economic rewards
Group standards are set and enforced bythe group itself
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
12/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-12
Conformity
Reference Groups: Groups in which a person is aware of other members,
defines self as a member, believes group members tobe significant
Individuals try to conform to norms of these groups asthey desire acceptance of the group
Asch Studies
Members desire to avoid being visibly different Members with differing opinions feel extensive
pressure to align with others
Level of conformity has declined since 1950s
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
13/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-13
Deviant Workplace Behavior
Voluntary behavior that violates significantorganizational norms and, in doing so,
threatens the well-being of the organization
or its members
Is likely to flourish when:
Supported by group norms People are in groups
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
14/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-14
Group Property 3: Status
A socially defined position or rank given togroups or group members by others
Determined by: The powera person wields over others
A persons abilityto contribute to a groups goals
An individuals personal characteristics
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
15/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-15
Impact of Status
High-status members: Often have more freedom to deviate from norms
Are better able to resist conformity pressures
Interaction among members of groupsis influenced by status High status people are more assertive
Low status members may not participate
Group creativity may suffer
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
16/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-16
Group Property 4: Size
Smaller groups are faster at completingtasksmembers perform better
Large groups are consistently better atproblem solving
Social Loafing - tendency to expend less
effort working in a group than as anindividual
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
17/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-17
Social Loafing
Causes:
Equity theoryunequaldistribution of work
Dispersion ofresponsibilityclouds therelationship betweenindividual inputs and
group output
Prevention:
Set group goals
Increase inter-group
competition Engage in peer evaluation
Distribute group rewardsbased on members
individual contributions
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
18/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-18
Group Property 5:Cohesiveness
The degree to whichmembers of the group areattracted to each other and
motivated to stay in thegroup
Performance-related norms are the
moderating variable forproductivity and cohesiveness
High cohesiveness with high normsgives higher productivity
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
19/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-19
Encouraging Cohesiveness
1. Make the group smaller
2. Encourage agreement with group goals
3. Increase the time spent together
4. Increase the status and perceived difficultyof group membership
5. Stimulate competition with other groups
6. Give rewards to the group rather than toindividual members
7. Physically isolate the group
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
20/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-20
Group Decision Making
Strengths
Generate more completeinformation andknowledge
Increased diversity ofviews(heterogenity)
Increased acceptance ofa solution
Weaknesses
Takes longer
Conformity pressures
Discussions can bedominated by one or afew members
Ambiguous responsibilityfor the final outcome
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
21/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-21
Effectiveness & Efficiency
Effectiveness: Accuracygroup is better than average individual but
worse than most accurate group member
Speedindividuals are faster
Creativitygroups are better
Degree of Acceptancegroups are better
Efficiency: Groups are generally less efficient
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
22/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-22
Groupthink Symptoms
A deterioration of individuals mentalefficiency, reality testing, and moral
judgments as a result of group pressures
Occurs when members:
Rationalize away resistance to assumptions
Pressure doubters to support the majority
Doubters keep silent/minimize their misgivings Illusion of unanimity -Interprets silence as ayes
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
23/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-23
MinimizingGroupthink
Limit group size (10)
Encourage group leaders
to actively seek inputfrom all members andavoid expressing their
own opinions Appoint a devils
advocate
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
24/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-24
Groupshift
Difference bw group and indvidual decisions
Group discussions lead members to assume new,more extreme, positions
Groups often take positions of greater risk
May be due to diffused responsibility
Occurs also when people want to demonstrate
how different they are from the group(politicians)
From this understand that the group decisionsexaggerate the initial position of individuals
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
25/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-25
Group Decision-MakingTechniques
Interacting groups meet face-to-face andrely on verbal and non-verbal interactions to
communicate
Brainstorming Generates a list of creative alternatives
Problem: production blocking
Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Restricts discussion during the decision-making
process to encourage independent thinking
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
26/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-26
Global Implications
Cultural differences affect the importance,display, and derivation of status.
Social loafing occurs mostly in individualisticcultures motivated by self-interest.
Diversity leads to greater conflict but thesurface-level recognition may makemembers more open-minded andacceptingleading to better decisions.
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
27/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-27
Implications for Managers
Positive relationship between roleperception and performance evaluation
Group norms can affect individualperformance either positively or negatively
Status inequities adversely impactproductivity and performance
Group size impacts effectiveness
Cohesiveness can influence productivity
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
28/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-28
Keep in Mind
Group norms, roles, and identities havepowerful affects on individual behavior
Conformity can be a problem: have leadersminimize initial inputs
Group decision making is not always betterthan individual decision making
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
29/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-29
Summary
1. Defined groupand differentiated between types ofgroups.
2. Identified the five stages of group development.
3. Listed and defined the five properties of groups.
4. Demonstrated how norms and status exert influence onan individuals behavior.
5. Contrasted the strengths and weaknesses of groupdecision making.
6. Evaluated evidence for cultural differences in groupstatus and social loafing as well as the effects ofdiversity in groups.
-
8/10/2019 Group Decision Making Chapter 9 vohra
30/30
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-30
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may bereproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the publisher. Printed in theUnited States of America.