guiding a ppt to writing iep goals & objectives aligned to the general education curriculum...
TRANSCRIPT
Guiding a PPT to Writing IEP Goals & Objectives Aligned to the
General Education Curriculum
Enfield Public SchoolsJanuary 12, 2006
25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT 06457-1520 · (860) 632-1485
Connecticut State Department of Education · Division of Teaching & Learning
1/12/06 SERC 2
A Warm-up
What is an IEP?
1/12/06 SERC 3
Individualized Education Program (IEP)
Present levels of academic & functional performance
Measurable annual goals
How & when progress will be measured & reported
Special education & related services/supplementary aids & services/program modifications or supports for school personnel
Explanation of extent, if any, the child will NOT participate with non-disabled children in regular class
Any accommodations necessary on state & district wide assessments
Beginning date & frequency, location, & duration of services & modifications
Post secondary goals & transition services (following 15th birthday)
“A written statement for each child with a disability that is developed, reviewed, & revised in accordance with this section & that includes -”
§614 (d) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 4
What is the Purpose of IDEA?
“ To ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living”
§601 (d) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 5
Based on That Purpose…
An IEP should focus on: Increasing time with non-disabled peers
(TWNDP)
Increasing participation and progress in general education curriculum
1/12/06 SERC 6
Let’s Talk Goals & Objectives
“When you ask for ‘good IEP goals and objectives’ you are putting the cart before the horse!”
Wrightslaw
1/12/06 SERC 7
What Practices Lead to Effective IEPs?
Knowing the rationale behind IEPs Decision-making Documenting the decisions Implementing the IEP Measuring student progress
The Rationale
Legal BackgroundTerminologyPhilosophy
Decision-Making Values
1/12/06 SERC 9
FAPE
Free Appropriate Public Education means special education and related services that…
have been provided at public expense; meet the standards of the State; include an appropriate school education; and conform with the IEP procedures
§602 (9) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 10
It is About Access
1/12/06 SERC 11
What Does Access Mean?
Access means a barrier-free opportunity to learn and use materials, resources, and events in natural settings.
“Barrier-free” means without any unnatural or arbitrary obstacles
Moll (2003)
1/12/06 SERC 12
1/12/06 SERC 13
What Is Essential to Know?
Special Education
Related Services
Supplementary Aids & Services
Least Restrictive Environment
Mainstreaming
Inclusion
1/12/06 SERC 14
Special Education
“Specially designed instruction, at no cost to parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability…”
§602 (29) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 15
Related Services “Transportation, and such developmental, corrective, and
other supportive services… as may be required to assist a child with a disability to benefit from special education...” speech-language pathology and audiology services interpreting services psychological services physical and occupational therapy recreation, including therapeutic recreation social work services school nurse services (to receive FAPE) counseling services, including rehabilitation counseling orientation and mobility services medical services (except medical services for diagnostic and
evaluation purposes only)
§602 (26) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 16
Supplementary Aids and Services
“Aids, services, and other supports that are provided in regular education classes or other education-related settings to enable children with disabilities to be educated with nondisabled children to the maximum extent appropriate in accordance with [LRE].”
§602 (33) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 17
LRE Provision
“ To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities… are educated with children who are not disabled, and special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only when the nature or severity of the disability of a child is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.”
§612 (a)(5)(A) of IDEA ‘04§612 (a)(5)(A) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 18
Mainstreaming
Selective placement of students in special education in one or more general education classes
Assumes a student must “earn” the opportunity by “keeping up” The student needed to adapt The general education classroom did not
change
1/12/06 SERC 19
Inclusion
Expresses a belief system (philosophy) of educating each child, to the maximum extent appropriate, in the school and classroom(s) where he or she would otherwise attend
Involves bringing support services to the child rather than moving the child to the services
1/12/06 SERC 20
A Necessary Paradigm Shift
MainstreamingMainstreaming
LRELREVisitor
MemberStetson and Associates, Inc.
ALL kids are general education students
Some just need supports and services
Stetson
1/12/06 SERC 22
Essential Questions About LRE
Do assessment procedures and IEP goals directly link to the general education curriculum?
Does the discussion about placement/location occur only after goals & objectives are set?
Is the first option considered general education classroom in every case every time?
Is removal considered only after supplementary aids and services were tried in the general education classroom?
1/12/06 SERC 23
What Are Your Decision-Making Values? More-is-Better
Assumes that quantity equals quality Tends to decrease LRE
Return-on-Investment Selects service most likely to “fix” Has an underlying notion of “you’re not ok”
Only-as-Special-as-Necessary Uses natural supports that exist in general education Determining the appropriate type & amount of service
Giangreco (2001)
Decision-Making
Meeting Norms
Sequence of Conversation
1/12/06 SERC 25
Planning & Placement Team (PPT)
“A group of certified or licensed professionals, who represent each of the teaching, administrative and pupil personnel staffs and who participate equally in the decision making process to determine the specific educational needs of the child and develop an IEP for the child.”
Conn. Agencies Regs. § 10-76a-1(15)
1/12/06 SERC 26
IEP Team A group of individuals composed of—
The parents; At least 1 regular education teacher; At least 1 special education teacher, A representative who is
Qualified to provide or supervise specially designed instruction;
Is knowledgeable about general education curriculum; & Is knowledgeable about availability of resources;
An individual who can interpret the instructional implications of evaluation results (may be a member of the team);
Other individuals who have special expertise; & Whenever appropriate, the child.
§614 (d) of IDEA ‘04
1/12/06 SERC 27
Why an Administrator?
Someone to ensure… Supervision of the special education Expertise in general education curriculum Appropriate services and resources are
provided without delay Coordination of staffing, scheduling, and
resources
1/12/06 SERC 28
Essential Questions for Membership
Do parents and students have an active roll in the PPT decisions, including a place for input?
Who has the expertise in the general education curriculum, including specific subject areas?
Who has specific knowledge about the student’s performance level?
Who has the ability to coordinate resources and supervise the implementation of special education services?
1/12/06 SERC 29
Meeting Norms
Membership Group dynamics
Conflict-resolution/Conflict management Consensus building
Shared framework (clear process) Purpose of meeting Flow of conversation & decisions Summarizing the recommendations
1/12/06 SERC 30
Reflection on Current Practice
How do I … ensure that all the necessary people attend the
FULL meeting and have equal participation in making decisions?
seek consensus and use skills in conflict-resolution/conflict management?
articulate the framework & flow of the meeting clearly so all members have shared meaning?
1/12/06 SERC 31
What Comes First?
Create a list that represents the typical order of decisions in a PPT.
1/12/06 SERC 32
Compare & Contrast
Compare this order to the IEP documentation.
12
3
1/12/06 SERC 33
Sequence of Conversation
Sequence of Conversation
Documenting the Decisions
PPT Meeting Notes
IEP Documentation
1/12/06 SERC 35
Reflective Question
What is the difference between these two terms? Paperwork
Documentation
1/12/06 SERC 36
Reflective Question
What is the difference between these two terms? Paperwork
work such as writing letters or reports, which must be done but is not very interesting
Documentation official documents, reports etc., that are used to
prove that something is true or correct
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English http://www.ldoceonline.com/
1/12/06 SERC 37
Reflective Question
Does the “paperwork” drive the process or does the process get documented?
1/12/06 SERC 38
Documentation of the Process
PPT Meeting Cover Page
Demographic information Record of Attendance
PPT Recommendations (Summary optional)
Prior Written Notice
**Required Data Collection
1/12/06 SERC 39
Documentation of the Process
IEP Present levels of Performance Transition Planning Goals & Objectives Program Accommodations & Modifications State & District Testing Accommodations Special Factors, Progress Reporting, Exit Criteria Summary of Special Education, Related Services, and
Regular Education
1/12/06 SERC 40
Essential Questions for Present Level of Performance How does the student’s present level of
performance compare to general education content & performance standards?
What general education standards does the student know and can do?
4 & 5
1/12/06 SERC 41
Demands/
Skills
Years in School
The Achievement Gaps
KU-CRL
Gap
Present Level
Expected Performance
1/12/06 SERC 42
Essential Questions for Specialized Instruction How does the student’s disability
specifically affect involvement and progress in to the general curriculum?
If {concern}, then {impact} occurs in the area of…
4 & 5
1/12/06 SERC 43
Essential Questions for Transition Planning How are the student’s preferences and
interests determined? How does the student’s transition planning
link to goals and objectives?
6
1/12/06 SERC 44
Essential Questions for Measurable Goals & Objectives Of the areas requiring specialized
instruction, what specific strategies, skills, and concepts does the student need to learn?
Under which general education conditions is the student expected to demonstrate the knowledge and skills?
7
1/12/06 SERC 45
Planning vs. Telling
The purpose of the PPT is to MAKE DECISIONS and create a PLAN
So when we come into the meeting with goals already written… Who really made the decisions? When were they made? What were they based on?
Does this comply with the intent of the law?
1/12/06 SERC 46
The Anatomy of Goal Setting
The Present Level of PerformanceWhat does the student know and can do in general education curriculum?
General Education Conditions What general education content standards are
expected to be learned?
During which activities, and/or tasks does the student need to demonstrate new learning?
1/12/06 SERC 47
The Anatomy of Goal Setting
Define the PerformanceWhat are the observable ways that the student will demonstrate his/her knowledge or skills?
Performance CriteriaTo what performance level will the student demonstrate knowledge and skills?
How many times or how often will the student demonstrate that performance?
1/12/06 SERC 48
What Needs to Be Learned?
Strategies Problem-solving and
decision-making Study skills Coping Compensation Self-awareness Self-management
Skills Able to do Specific applications
Concepts Need to know Abstract ideas
1/12/06 SERC 49
Benchmarks vs. Objectives
Benchmarks Break down the
performance levels to meet a given goal
Build on the previous benchmark
Articulate the rate of progress
Objectives Break out the goal into
discrete skills Interrelate to each
other Articulate the various
strategies or skills of an overarching goal
1/12/06 SERC 50
Writing a Desired Goal
Clearly define the outcome Observable (can be seen) Measurable (can be counted) Specific (clear terms, no room for a judgment call)
When {condition} occurs, {the student} will {demonstrate} from {baseline/present level of performance} to {target} {number of times}.
1/12/06 SERC 51
Accommodations vs. Modifications
Accommodation A change made to the
teaching or testing procedures in order to provide a student with access to information and to create an EQUAL OPPORTUNITY to demonstrate knowledge and skills (HOW)
Modification A change in what the
student is expected to learn and/or demonstrate (WHAT)
While a student may be working on modified course content, the subject area/context remains the same as for the rest of the class.
Nolet, V. & McLaughlin, M. J. (2000)
1/12/06 SERC 52
Accommodations vs. Modifications
Accommodation Can be put into the
condition as part of the activity or task
Can become the strategy or skill that is learned
Modification Is set in the
performance criteria
and/or Qualifies the condition
and skill
1/12/06 SERC 53
Essential Questions for Reporting Progress What is the expected amount of growth? How will it be known that the student has made
progress? What is the monitoring process?
Type of assessment Frequency
How will progress be reported?
7
1/12/06 SERC 54
Essential Questions for Program Accommodations & Modifications What is the impact of this accommodation on:
learning; access to general education curriculum; independence?
How can this accommodation be more like peers and enrich the learning of others?
How is this accommodation able to be implemented with integrity?
What assistive technology was considered?
7 & 8
1/12/06 SERC 55
Essential Questions for State & District Testing Which accommodations increase the student’s
opportunity to successfully demonstrate learning?
How do these accommodations impact the student’s ability to take a test?
How do these accommodations align with the accommodations used in the student’s daily instruction?
9
1/12/06 SERC 56
Essential Questions for Special Factors and Exit Criteria What was considered for students with behavior
concerns, visual impairments, hearing impairments, or for students who do not have English as a primary language?
How often will the student’s progress be reported?
How and when will the student exit special education services?
10
1/12/06 SERC 57
Essential Questions for Services, & Regular Education What is it the student needs to learn? How frequently does the student need
direct instruction? Who will provide the instruction? Who will be responsible to oversee
implementation & monitor student progress?
Where will the instruction occur?11
1/12/06 SERC 58
Key Word: ALIGNMENT
Concern/needs
Goals & Objectives/ Accommodations & Modifications
Levels/Types of Support
Implementing the IEP
Build School & Classroom Capacity
Staffing & Scheduling
1/12/06 SERC 60
Integrity
Did we do what we said we would do? Reasons why we tend not to follow through:
IEP was not a “working document” for all implementers IEP was not clearly defined or comprehensive The skills of the implementers were not adequate The right resources (time, money, personnel) were not
supplied
1/12/06 SERC 61
Implementation Integrity
Did I… Assign reasonable case loads? Create schedules that allow for collaboration? Provide professional development & specific
training for the supports described in the IEP? Provide the appropriate resources? Supervise and evaluate the implementation?
Measuring Student Progress
Evaluating Impact
Reporting Progress
1/12/06 SERC 63
Measuring the Effectiveness of Implementation Did we achieve our goals for student
outcomes? How do we know this?
Did we set a predetermined goal line? Did we monitor student progress and make
appropriate adjustments? Did we examine why the goal was met or not
met?
1/12/06 SERC 64
Monitoring vs. Evaluating
Monitoring On-going and frequent Part of the
implementation process
Provide information for adjustments in plan
Evaluating A specific point in time A review of the
implementation process
Provide information for decisions on next steps
1/12/06 SERC 65
Monitor the Progress
Monitor the level and rate of progress of student learning Monitor on a frequent basis (daily or weekly)
Student progress Implementation Integrity
Check for rate of progress as it relates to the target goal line
1/12/06 SERC 66
Resources for IEP Development Bateman, B.D. & Herr, C. M. (2003). Writing Measurable
IEP Goals and Objectives. Wisconsin: IEP Resources.
Clark, S. G. (2000). The IEP process as a tool for collaboration. Teaching Exceptional Children 33(2): 56-66.
Giangreco, M. F. (2001). Guidelines for making decision about IEP services. http://www.uvm.edu/~mgiangre/
Massanari, C. B. (2002). Connecting the IEP to the general curriculum: A talking paper.
Nolet, V. & McLaughlin, M. J. (2000). Accessing the General Curriculum: Including Students with Disabilities in Standards-Based Reform. California: Corwin Press.
1/12/06 SERC 67
Resources for IEP Development Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Marchand-Martella, N. & Martella, R.
C. (2001). Writing better goals and short-term objectives or benchmarks. Teaching Exceptional Children 34(1): 52-58.
Moll, A. M. (2003). Differentiated Instruction Guide for Inclusive Teaching. New York: Dude Publishing.
Reed, P. Let’s put the planning back in Individual Educational Programs. http://www.wati.org/at_services/pdf/atintheeip.pdf
Whitworth, J. E. (1994). Training in developing effective IEP's: The Illinois experience.
1/12/06 SERC 68
An IEP should not be a New Year’s Resolution!
It is a Contract!!!