handbook - wordpress.com · 14/07/2017 · 1 1. introduction final year project (fyp) is a...
TRANSCRIPT
FINAL YEAR PROJECTHANDBOOK
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii
LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... iv
LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................. v
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Objectives of FYP ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 FYP Management ................................................................................................................................ 2
2. PROJECT CATEGORIES ....................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Project Domains .................................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Searching For Project Titles ................................................................................................................. 7
3. FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1) ........................................................................................................... 8
3.1 FYP1 Execution Procedure ................................................................................................................... 8
3.1.1 Registration ............................................................................................................................. 8
3.1.2 FYP1 Briefing ........................................................................................................................... 8
3.1.3 Appointment of Supervisor ..................................................................................................... 9
3.1.4 Initial Project Proposal Submission ....................................................................................... 12
3.1.5 Project Proposal Approval ..................................................................................................... 12
3.1.6 Supervision Meeting and Log Book ....................................................................................... 13
3.1.7 FYP Class and Presentation Week Briefing ............................................................................ 14
3.1.8 FYP1 Report Submission ........................................................................................................ 14
3.1.9 FYP1 Presentation Week ....................................................................................................... 15
3.1.10 FYP1 Report Correction ......................................................................................................... 15
3.1.11 FYP1 Evaluation ..................................................................................................................... 15
3.1.12 FYP1 Presentation ................................................................................................................. 16
3.2 FYP1 Project Report ........................................................................................................................... 17
3.2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 17
3.2.2 FYP1 Report Structure ........................................................................................................... 17
3.2.3 FYP1 Report General Guideline ............................................................................................. 19
ii
3.2.4 Plagiarism and Cheating ........................................................................................................ 20
3.2.5 FYP1 Report Binding .............................................................................................................. 21
3.3 FYP1 Project Evaluation ..................................................................................................................... 22
3.3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 22
3.3.2 FYP1 Evaluation Components ............................................................................................... 22
4. FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) ......................................................................................................... 24
4.1 FYP2 Execution Procedure ................................................................................................................. 24
4.1.1 Registration ........................................................................................................................... 24
4.1.2 FYP2 Briefing ......................................................................................................................... 24
4.1.3 FYP2 Project Progress Evaluation .......................................................................................... 24
4.1.4 Supervision Meeting and Log Book ....................................................................................... 26
4.1.5 FYP2 Report Submission ........................................................................................................ 26
4.1.6 FYP2 Presentation Week ....................................................................................................... 27
4.1.7 FYP2 Report Correction ......................................................................................................... 27
4.1.8 FYP2 Evaluation ..................................................................................................................... 27
4.1.9 FYP2 Presentation ................................................................................................................. 27
4.2 FYP2 Project Report ........................................................................................................................... 28
4.3 FYP2 Project Evaluation ..................................................................................................................... 29
4.3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 29
4.3.2 FYP2 Evaluation Components ............................................................................................... 29
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1 : Procedure for FYP1 ......................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 4.1 : Procedure for FYP2 ......................................................................................................................... 25
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Topics under Different Areas of Computing ....................................................................................... 5
Table 2.2: Topics – Research-based or Project-based ......................................................................................... 6
Table 3.1 : FYP 1 Classes .................................................................................................................................... 14
Table 3.2: FYP1 Assessment Component .......................................................................................................... 22
Table 4.1: FYP2 Assessment Component .......................................................................................................... 29
v
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A : PROJECT PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORM ................................................................................... 30
APPENDIX B : PROJECT REPORT SUBMISSION FORM ........................................................................................ 34
APPENDIX C : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1) EVALUATION FORM - SUPERVISOR ............................................ 36
APPENDIX D : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1) EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 1 ........................................... 44
APPENDIX E : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1) EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 2 ............................................ 50
APPENDIX F : FYP LOG BOOK ............................................................................................................................. 54
APPENDIX G : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) PROJECT PROGRESS EVALUATION FORM - SUPERVISOR ........... 58
APPENDIX H : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) EVALUATION FORM – SUPERVISOR ........................................... 62
APPENDIX I : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 1 ............................................. 74
APPENDIX J : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 2 ............................................ 84
1
1. INTRODUCTION
Final Year Project (FYP) is a compulsory course to be taken by all registered final year
undergraduate students of UniMy and it is one of the conditions which need to be fulfilled for the
purpose of graduation. In FYP, students will have the opportunity to further explore the knowledge
and theories gained in classes and to apply them in the form of applied or research-based project.
FYP is a two semester long course which is divided into two phase – Final Year Project 1 (FYP1)
and Final Year Project 2 (FYP2) – respectively.
1.1 Objectives of FYP
a. The objectives for FYP1 :
i. Identifying suitable and relevant topic which can be developed either through
development or research activities and match the level expected of an
undergraduate student.
ii. Identifying relevant information pertaining to project’s requirements from a
variety of resources.
iii. Explaining and applying project development or research methodologies
appropriate to the project.
iv. Plan, design and propose a feasible project based on the given timeline.
v. Communicating project ideas and final product through technical
report and presentation.
b. The objectives of FYP2 :
i. Develop the project in FYP1 according to the proposed plan and design.
ii. Verify and validate the developed projects against the proposed objectives goals
iii. Proposing future improvement based on project outcomes.
iv. Communicating project ideas and final product through technical
report and presentation.
2
1.2 FYP Management
Faculty of Computing, UniMy has setup a committee to monitor, supervise and manage the
implementation of FYP. The committee will assist the students by providing all the required
information and materials required throughout the duration of FYP.
The faculty has created a dedicated FYP website (https://fypunimy.wordpress.com) where
students can access :
a. Latest news and announcement
b. FYP calendars
c. FYP presentation schedules
d. Suggested topics for FYP
e. FYP forms – supervisor selection, evaluation, etc.
f. The list of lecturers and their area of expertise
Printed information and memos will also be posted on the announcement boards. Students
ARE STRONGLY ADVISED to regularly check for updates and news from the website and the
announcement board. Students can also meet any of the FYP committee members for any questions
or problems relating to FYP.
3
2. PROJECT CATEGORIES
2.1 Introduction
There are two types of projects allowed in FYP: System Development and Research-based.
i. System Development
This type of project is based on developing an application, software or
embedded systems. The undertaken project must include programming elements
with appropriate users’ complexity and meets the scope of FYP. This type of project
gives the students an opportunity to conduct exercise as a project developer in the
area of computing.
Examples of applications that can been developed in this area are web based
application, RFID-based project, sensor, PDA-based application, mobile phone
application including SMS, .NET application, TINI based systems, robotics, etc.
ii. Research-based
This type of project is based on a research application that includes data
analysis, comparative studies or application of techniques or algorithms. Similar
to project based, programming elements must be included in the research project via
the development of a prototype. The prototype shall serve as testing module or
proving mechanism for the research idea explored in the project. It also emphasizes
on analysis as well as technical writing of the report.
Students are expected to read few technical papers and able to digest with the
help from the appointed supervisors. This type of project aims at grooming the
students with research skills in the area of computer networking, computer security
4
and embedded system. It is suitable for students who are interested in Research and
Development (R&D) careers such as academic professionals and researchers.
Examples of research-based projects that can developed in this area are
application of statistical technique in analyzing network data, new technique in
parallel cryptography, comparative study of IDS performance, implementation of
soft computing technique in solving security and network problems.
2.2 Project Domains
There are different fields of study under each area in Faculty of
Computing as shown in Table 2.1. The list is not definite, thus students are allowed to propose any
topic or idea from other domain or field of study related to computing.
In the same time, students are also encouraged to explore interdisciplinary topic.
Interdisciplinary means, the project is a mixture between two different fields example Malware
Detection using Artificial Neural Networks. It is a security field but using the tools from Software
Engineering domain. No matter which field the project belongs to, students can do it either in
system development or research-based projects. Each project types will differ in
terms of problem, goal, methodology and design
Table 2.2 shows examples of topics which can be explored in either project-based or research-
based FYP.
5
Table 2.1: Topics under Different Areas of Computing
COMPUTER SCIENCE INFORMATION SYSTEM SOFTWARE ENGINEERING BIO-COMPUTING
Computer Security
(Cryptography,
Steganography, Access
Control, Security
Technology)
Grid/Parallel/Distributed
Mobile Computing
Computer Networking
Collaborative virtual
environment
Embedded Systems
Artificial Intelligent
Optimization
Data analysis
System Development
Information Systems
Information Systems
Development
Decision Support Systems
Project management
Database
Information Retrieval
Decision Support System (DSS)
Customer Relationship
Management (CRM)
Knowledge management
System Development
Soft computing
Software System Development Evolution
Software Design/ Architecture
Software Quality
Software Modelling and Process
Software Testing
Software Requirement
Software Reusability
Embedded Real-time Software,
Requirement Traceability
Artificial Intelligence (Neural network,
Genetic Algorithm, Support Vector Machine,
Fuzzy Logic, Speech Processing)
Planning and Scheduling
Automata and Formal Language
Business Rules and Design Pattern
Web-based Application
Human Computer Interaction (HCI)
Expert System
Image Processing and Pattern Recognition
Human Computer Interaction
Computer Games
Visualization\Object Modeling
Virtual Environment- Artificial Intelligence
Web Technology
Computational Systems
Biology
High Performance Computing,
Cancer classification
Remote Homology,
Gene Ontology
Remote Homology,
Protein Structure Prediction
Protein Structure
Biological Modeling,
Synthetic Biology
Protein Docking
Biodiversity,
Biological Science
6
Table 2.2: Topics – Research-based or Project-based
AREA PROJECT-BASED RESEARCH-BASED
Computer Networking
Wi-Fi Network Manager Characteristic of User Network Traffic
Network Monitoring System Based on OpenNMS Study on GPRS Multiclass Traffic Using Partial Buffer Sharing
Group Discussion using VOIP Technology
Study on GPRS Multiclass Traffic Using Random Early Detection
Bluetooth Software Controller
Bus Speed Monitoring System Using GPS
Network Simulation Using OPNET
Embedded System
Home storage inventory system (HSIS) using PDA, Embedded Server and RFID
Comparison of RFID Standards
Smart Student Room Allocation System A study on room allocation algorithm
Student Loan & Scholarship System
Smart Gate System
7
2.3 Searching For Project Titles
Students are encouraged to find ideas based on :
i. previous topics developed by students of other universities
ii. technical papers (white papers, journal, conference)
iii. relevant real-life problem
iv. current trend in mobile app repository website such as Google Rank or Apple list
v. most googled keywords
vi. discussion with supervisor
However, students are advised to discuss with the supervisor on the feasibility of the topics.
Students are also encouraged to find a topic that is related to his/her field of study. Even though
information system based topic which focus on the normal create, read, update, delete (CRUD)
functionalities is famous among students, students are advise to add extra functionalities such as
data analytics, data visualization or specific searching algorithm which will make the project becomes
more suitable with the expectation of a final year project.
In the same time, students must avoid topics which are too ambitious and have a high degree
of complexity which will lead to project incompletion or other risks which may jeopardize the project
and the student’s timeframe. Discuss all possible topics with the supervisor before choosing the most
suitable topic for the project.
8
3. FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1)
This section outline the major procedures which need to be followed by the students,
supervisors and evaluators. These procedures must be followed in ensuring the success of FYP1.
3.1 FYP1 Execution Procedure
In general, FYP1 starts when the students register for the course at the beginning of the
semester. This is then followed by supervisor selection process where students will discuss with
his/her potential supervisor(s) on topic(s) that match the interest of both parties. After gaining the
supervisor’s consent, the students will start develop the initial proposal which then need to be
submitted and approved the FYP committee. Once the proposed topic is approved, students need
to regularly meet and discuss with the supervisor(s) on matters related to the execution of the
project and get themselves ready for project presentation and evaluation at the end of
the semester. Figure 3.1 illustrates the overall procedures of FYP1.
3.1.1 Registration
FYP1 can only be registered by final year students which have fulfil the minimum
requirements and pre-requisite of FYP1 as stated in the course plan. Registration period is 2 weeks,
starting from 1 week before the semester’s registration day until the end of Week 1. Students must
register the correct course code in order to proceed.
3.1.2 FYP1 Briefing
In Week 1, a briefing session chaired by the FYP Coordinator will be held as introductory class
for all registered students. The briefing session will explain the flow of process and procedures of
FYP1, supervisor and topic selection, rules and regulations and other important matters related to
FYP. Students’ attendance are compulsory.
9
3.1.3 Appointment of Supervisor
Students are responsible to approach and find a potential supervisor who will assist and guide
them in the implementation of the project. The appointed supervisor will supervise the students for
both FYP1 and FYP2. Two approaches can be used in selecting the potential supervisor :
i. Lecturers who have potential topics for FYP are required to publish those topics.
Students may approach their potential supervisor based on the topics.
ii. Students may approach any lecturers with their own topics/ideas
Each lecturers can only supervise a limited number of FYP students, therefore, students are
encouraged to meet up with their potential supervisor as early as possible. The following tips could
be used as guides in approaching the supervisor :
i. Have a discussion with a few lecturers before making the final selection. Factors to
consider:
A supervisor who has sufficient knowledge on the intended project.
A supervisor who has the same interest on the intended project.
Co-supervisor, if the intended project is a cross discipline area.
ii. DO NOT appoint a supervisor at the last minute. If possible, appoint one
before the semester opens.
iii. Each student must get the supervisor’s agreement/consent to supervise them.
iv. Check the list of lecturers and their areas of interests at the FYP website
10
3.1.3.1 The Responsibilities of Supervisor
Supervisor plays important role in Final Year Project. In general, a supervisor is responsible to
advice, guide and monitor a student’s progress in FYP. Besides that, in a good supervisor-student
relationship, a supervisor also plays the role of a counselor and motivator. However, it is not advisable
for the students to be too independent on his/her supervisor especially in developing the content for
FYP.
The following is a guideline on the responsibilities of the supervisor :
i. To give guidance about the nature of the project and the standard expected, about
the development of the Proposal, literature research, techniques and methods
selection, and about any problems of plagiarism (please refer to Section 4.4).
ii. To ensure that the proposed project exhibits the appropriate attributes expected of a
final year project on a computing degree.
iii. To hold regular weekly meeting or discussion session with the student.
iv. To ensure that the Log Book is kept up to date.
v. To be accessible, within reason, at other times for giving advice to the student.
vi. To request evidence of progress and to ensure that the student is aware of any
inadequacy of progress or of standards of work below those expected.
vii. To provide constructive criticism on any work presented.
viii. To encourage the student to produce early draft chapters of the project report, to
comment on them critically and return them promptly. (However it is the student’s
responsibility to write draft material, and if they do not do so the student loses an
opportunity for formative feedback).
Students are required to meet the supervisor on regular basis with minimum requirement of 6
meeting throughout the FYP1 timeframe. Supervisor shall regularly check and verify the student’s
FYP Log Book. The log book is one of the evaluation criteria at the end of the FYP.
11
Figure 3.1 : Procedure for FYP1
Note :
minimum 6
formal
12
3.1.3.2 Co-Supervisor
Student with the permission of his/her supervisor is allowed to appoint a co-supervisor.
Student MUST INFORM the FYP Committee of the appointment by stating the co-supervisor’s name
on the Project Proposal Submission Form (Appendix A).
Important notes on co-supervisor :
i. Co-supervisor’s responsibilities are but not limited to :
Guide the students during the idea development
Become the subject matter expert if the project’s domain is not within the
expertise of the main supervisor.
Introduce students to any other external organization which may assist the
student in completing the project
ii. Co-supervisor can be appointed among UniMy academic staff, industry players or
other external organizations related to the project.
iii. Co-supervisor will not involve in the assessment of the student’s FYP components.
3.1.4 Initial Project Proposal Submission
Once the student and the supervisor agreed on the topic, students must then starts
developing initial proposal for the project. Initial proposal would require the students to do
information search, identify the objectives, goals and scope of the projects. Initial proposal will give
a general idea to the reader about the projects and the expected final product.
Students are required to submit an initial proposal to the FYP committee by using the
Project Proposal Submission Form (please refer to Appendix A).
3.1.5 Project Proposal Approval
The FYP Committee will organize an evaluation session to discuss and approve all the
proposed topics for FYP1. In general, all topics will be evaluated based on :
13
i. No duplication with previous projects in terms of objectives and scopes for a particular
problem domain
ii. Students are clear on the objectives and scopes of the projects
iii. Students meet the minimum requirements in terms of technologies to be applied in
the project
iv. The topics is relevant, feasible and suitable with the student’s field of study.
In case where further clarification is required, the panel may held special interview session
with the students in order to identify the above mentioned criteria.
Note to all students :
For rejected topics, student are required to propose a new topic within 1 week after
the panel’s decision announced.
Students are not allowed to change his/her FYP topic once the topic is approved by
the FYP Committee. In situation where there is a need for such action, student must
discuss the matter with the FYP Coordinator.
3.1.6 Supervision Meeting and Log Book
It is the responsibilities of the students to meet and discuss the progress of the project with
his/her supervisor regularly. This will help the students to execute their project according to the
faculty’s procedure and standards. Most important is the supervisor will be able to guide the students
in achieving the objectives and goals of the projects.
Students are required to arrange for a minimum of 6 formal meetings with their supervisor
before they are allowed to submit the final report and present the FYP1. All meetings must be
recorded in a logbook (refer to Appendix F) and supervisor’s signature of approval for each meeting
is required.
14
3.1.7 FYP Class and Presentation Week Briefing
A series of lectures will be conducted over a period of 5 weeks. These lectures will assist the
students in the execution of the project especially in developing the content for the FYP1 report.
Table 3.1 shows the proposed topics to be covered in the FYP classes.
Table 3.1 : FYP 1 Classes
WEEK TOPICS
1
Faculty level briefing
Departmental project/research areas briefing
Identifying problem statements, objectives, and scopes of the project.
Project planning via logbook and Gantt chart
2 Literature review skills
Referencing techniques
3 Project methodology
Data collection
User/system requirements analysis
4 Project design
Project implementation, coding, testing
5 Project discussion and conclusions (last chapter)
Project presentation (tips, do’s and don’ts)
3.1.8 FYP1 Report Submission
In Week 7, each student is required to submit their project report for evaluation. Supervisor’s
approval is required before submitting the report to the committee. The submission must also
includes :
i. FYP1 report - 3 copies
ii. FYP Submission Form - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix B)
15
iii. FYP1 Evaluation Form – Supervisor - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix C)
iv. FYP1 Evaluation Form – Examiner 1 - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix D)
v. FYP1 Evaluation Form – Examiner 2 - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix E)
vi. FYP1 Log Book - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix F)
Late submission is totally prohibited. The committee has the authority to reject any late submission
and the student will not be allowed to present his FYP1.
3.1.9 FYP1 Presentation Week
FYP presentation week is one the most important milestone in FYP1. In this week (Week 8),
students will present their FYP1 outcome and will be evaluated by a panel of two (2) evaluators /
examiners appointed by the FYP Committee. The FYP committee will release the presentation
schedule in Week 7 and all sessions are open for everyone to attend. Guidelines and procedures to
FYP presentation are described in section 3.1.12.
3.1.10 FYP1 Report Correction
At the end of the FYP presentation, students will receive a comment form from the examiners.
Students are then required to do correction based on the comments. Students are urged to discuss
all comments with their supervisor and take appropriate actions. If required, corrections made to the
report must be endorsed by both supervisor and evaluators.
3.1.11 FYP1 Evaluation
At the end of the semester, each student’s project will be evaluated in determining
that the objectives and scope are adequate and are aligned with project aim. A
16
passing grade in FYP1 is a requirement for FYP2. Details on the evaluation criteria are explained in
section 3.3.
3.1.12 FYP1 Presentation
Thirty (30) minutes is allocated to each student for presentation, with 20
minutes for slides presentation and 10 minutes for the question and answer (Q&A) session.
It is advisable for the students to include only important points in the slide to ensure
that the presentation time is not exceeded. As a rule of thumb, one slide is equivalent
to one minute of presentation time.
However, the whole presentation should contain the following items:
i. An introduction to introduce presenter, the project title, as well as the
supervisor.
ii. An overview of the overall presentation (i.e. structure of the presentation,
outline).
iii. Project background, aim, objectives, and scopes of the project (this should be
enough to cover what has been written in Chapter 1 of the project’s report).
iv. Summary of literature review (as explained in Chapter 2 of the project’s
report).
v. Summary of research/system development methodology. This may include
the data collection techniques such as survey, organization visits, etc. (Chapter 3 and
Chapter 4).
vi. List of software and hardware that are required to develop the project.
vii. Summary of initial findings during FYP1. For instance, analysis of data
collected from survey, or perhaps initial interface design of the proposed
system (Chapter 5).
viii. Discussion on FYP2 execution plan.
ix. Conclusion of the presentation.
17
Students are advised to follow the subsequent good practices for their projects’ presentations:
i. Arrive early for the presentation.
ii. Limit the use of text in slides and make sure there is no spelling error.
iii. Include more figures, pictures, charts, etc.
iv. Have eye contact with the audiences.
v. Dress according to the UniMy’s student dress code.
vi. Speak clearly. Do not mumble.
vii. Manage the presentation time so that there is ample time for Q&A session.
viii. Practice beforehand.
ix. Do not forget to thank the audience for listening.
3.2 FYP1 Project Report
3.2.1 Introduction
Students undertaking FYP1 course must submit a written report at the end of the semester,
according to the schedule prepared by the FYP Committee. The report is the result of the project
work that has been conducted and will be assessed by panel of evaluators. Evaluators will only award
credit for good quality writing. Therefore students should produce clear and concise reports.
Relevant notations, terminology and computer science knowledge should be used throughout the
report. This chapter only provide general guidelines for writing the report. For a more details
description and guideline, please refer to the Final Year Project Report Guideline document.
3.2.2 FYP1 Report Structure
The basic FYP report structure is as follows :
a. Preliminary pages
b. List of contents titles, sub-titles, figures, tables, abbreviation and appendices
c. Report content (Chapter 1 – Chapter 5)
d. Appendices
18
3.2.2.1 Preliminary Pages
Preliminary pages are the early part of the report. These pages include :
i. Front page
ii. Acknowledgement page (optional)
- Written in one page to acknowledge gratitude to contributing
persons/parties.
iii. Abstract
- In English only.
iv. Content page
v. List of table page
vi. List of figure page
- Figures include diagrams, photographs, screen shots, graphs, charts, code
snippets, etc.
vii. List of abbreviation page
viii. List of terms page
ix. List of appendices
- Each appendix must be name, e.g. Appendix A, Appendix B followed with
specific titles.
- Listed in alphabetical order.
3.2.2.2 Report Content / Body / Chapter
FYP1 report MUST CONSISTS all of the following chapters :
i. Chapter 1 : Introduction
ii. Chapter 2 : Literature Review
iii. Chapter 3 : Methodology
iv. Chapter 4 :
- Project-based : Proposed System Design
19
- Research-based : Experimental Setup/Research Design / Research
Procedure
v. Chapter 5 : Initial Result and Conclusion
vi. Reference
vii. Appendices
- FYP1 plan – use Gantt chart (compulsory)
- Initial plan for FYP2 – use Gantt chart (compulsory)
- Relevant appendices, example :
o Organizational chart, sample of interview, sample of questionnaire,
use case diagram, sequence diagram, class diagram, database
design diagram, test cases
3.2.3 FYP1 Report General Guideline
The general guideline for thesis writing is as follows:
i. Do not cut and paste information from original sources. Instead students must use
their own words in restating statements from books or general/public information.
ii. Write in a concise and clear manner that is easily understood. Refrain from
long running sentences.
iii. Use words and sentences that convey exact meanings; and refrain from
ambiguous statements.
iv. Every abbreviation must be written in its complete form in the abbreviation
list. In the text, the first usage of the group of words to be abbreviated must
be written clearly and in full, followed by the abbreviation in brackets as
shown in example below.
The Unified Modeling Method (UML) is used…
On subsequent usage, the abbreviation may be used on its own.
v. Sections and sub-sections should be written in a logical sequence.
20
vi. Ensure continuity of sentences, paragraphs, sections and the overall report.
a. Figures and tables are numbered in sequence following the chapters, not
sections. Example, for Chapter 3 :
o Figures should be numbered starting with Figure 3.1, followed by Figure
3.2, Figure 3.3 and so on.
o Tables for Chapter 3 will follow the same sequence, Table 3.1, Table 3.2,
Table 3.3 and so on.
vii. Main information and analysis are put in the body of the report, while
supportive information and analysis are added as appendix.
viii. The maximum number of pages for the report, excluding appendix and initial pages :
- FYP1 : maximum 50 pages
- FYP2 : maximum 100 pages
- Permission must be granted by the FYP Committee if this maximum is
exceeded.
To construct the title of a project:
i. Must mirror the content
ii. Must reflect problem solution
iii. Usage of technology name in title only needed if technology is novel
3.2.4 Plagiarism and Cheating
Plagiarism and cheating are regarded as very serious offences. In cases where cheating is
confirmed, students shall be severely penalized, from losing all marks for an assignment, to facing
disciplinary action at the university level.
In UniMy, cheating means seeking to obtain an unfair advantage in any examination or any
other written or practical work to be submitted or completed by a student for assessment. It includes
the use of any means to gain an unfair advantage for any assessable work in the unit, where the
means is contrary to the instructions for such work.
21
When you submit a dissertation, which consist of a program, a report, an essay, or other piece
of work, under your name you are understood to be stating that this is your own work. If a submission
is identical with, or similar to, someone else's work, an assumption of cheating may arise. If you are
planning on working with another student, it is acceptable to undertake research together, and
discuss problems, but it is not acceptable to jointly develop or share solutions unless this is specified
by your lecturer.
Intentionally providing students with your solutions to assignments is classified as "assisting
to cheat" and students who do this may be subject to disciplinary action. You should take reasonable
care that your solution is not accidentally or deliberately obtained by other students. For example,
do not leave copies of your work in progress on the hard drives of shared computers, and do not
show your work to other students. If you believe this may have happened, please be sure to contact
your lecturer as soon as possible.
Plagiarism is a form of dishonesty. Plagiarism involves the false representation of another
person's ideas, or findings, as your own by either copying material or paraphrasing without citing the
sources. All sources should be cited and all quotations from the works of other authors clearly
identified as such. It is both professional and ethical to reference clearly the ideas and information
that you have used from another writer. If the source is not identified, then you have plagiarized
work of the other author.
3.2.5 FYP1 Report Binding
In Week 7, all students are required to submit three (3) copies of their FYP1 report to the
committee for evaluation. The binding format for the report is as follows :
i. The report cover page :
a. Paper color : blue (advisable : the same blue as in UniMy logo)
b. Format : as shown in the in Final Year Project Report Guideline.
ii. Binding : comb-bind
22
The report must be printed on A4-sized paper preferably using laser-jet printer. The two (2)
copies report will not be returned, so it is advisable for the student to print an extra copy for self-
reference.
3.3 FYP1 Project Evaluation
3.3.1 Introduction
This chapter outlines evaluation criteria for FYP1. Students must read the following evaluation
criteria so that they are aware about the marking schemes and able to fulfill all the required
assessment criteria. The evaluation criteria listed in this section is applicable to both type of FYP –
development and research track.
3.3.2 FYP1 Evaluation Components
Evaluation of FYP1 is divided into 2 components – the supervisor and the evaluators with each
component carries 60% and 40% weightage respectively. In general, Table 3.2 shows the evaluation
criteria for FYP1.
Table 3.2: FYP1 Assessment Component
COMPONENT CRITERIA MARK TOTAL MARK WEIGHTAGE
Supervisor
Student Progress & Individual Attribute
20 100 S =
𝑥
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘 ∗ 60
FYP1 Report 80
Examiner 1 FYP1 Report 80 100 E =
𝑥
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘 ∗ 40
Examiner 2 Presentation 20
Grand Total S + E
23
Each criteria as mentioned in Table 3.2 will be assessed based on the identified sub-
criteria. Each sub-criteria will be given point based on non-uniform mark range assessment. Each
point will then be normalized according to the mark stated in Table 3.2.
Appendix C, Appendix D and Appendix E show the respective evaluation form for each sub-
criteria. Students are encouraged to refer these evaluation forms as guideline throughout the
implementation of FYP1.
24
4. FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2)
This section outline the major procedures which need to be followed by the students,
supervisors and evaluators. These procedures must be followed in ensuring the success of FYP2.
4.1 FYP2 Execution Procedure
In general, FYP2 starts when the students register for the course at the beginning of the
semester if they have successfully passed the FYP1 in the previous semester. Figure 4.1 illustrates the
overall procedures of FYP2.
4.1.1 Registration
It is important to mention here that students are not automatically registered to undertake
FYP2 even though they have completed and passed FYP1. Normal registration procedure still needs
to be done and the failure to register will result in disqualification to undertake FYP2.
4.1.2 FYP2 Briefing
In Week 1, a briefing session chaired by the FYP Coordinator will be held as introductory class
for all registered students. The briefing session will explain the FYP2 calendar, flow of process and
procedures of FYP2, and other important matters related to FYP2. Students’ attendance are
compulsory.
4.1.3 FYP2 Project Progress Evaluation
Students are required to regularly demonstrate their project development updates to their
supervisors. Project progress is compulsory and is evaluated as part of FYP2 grade. This demo also
25
acts as a benchmark for the supervisor to decide whether the students will proceed with the final
presentation.
Figure 4.1 : Procedure for FYP2
Start FYP2
End of FYP2
Passed FYP1 AND Registered for FYP2
FYP2 Briefing (W1)
Continuous Report Writing AND Discussion with Supervisor (W1 – W14)
Project Progress Evaluation (W12)
Submission of Draft Report to Supervisor (W13)
Draft Report Correction (W13)
Submission of Report, Log Book and All Required Evaluation Forms (W14)
FYP2 Presentation (W15)
Report Correction (W16)
Submission of Hard Bound Thesis & CD (W17)
26
4.1.4 Supervision Meeting and Log Book
It is the responsibilities of the students to meet and discuss the progress of the project with
his/her supervisor regularly. This will help the students to execute their project according to the
faculty’s procedure and standards. Most important is the supervisor will be able to guide the students
in achieving the objectives and goals of the projects.
Students are required to arrange for a minimum of 6 formal meetings with their supervisor
before they are allowed to submit the final report and present the FYP2. All meetings must be
recorded in a log book (refer to Appendix F) and supervisor’s signature of approval for each meeting
is required.
4.1.5 FYP2 Report Submission
Each student is required to submit their project report for evaluation. Supervisor’s approval
is required before submitting the report to the committee. The submission must also includes :
i. FYP2 report - 3 copies
ii. FYP Submission Form - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix B)
iii. FYP Log Book - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix F)
iv. FYP2 Evaluation Form – Supervisor - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix H)
v. FYP2 Evaluation Form – Examiner 1 - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix I)
vi. FYP2 Evaluation Form – Examiner 2 - 1 copy (please refer to Appendix J)
Late submission is totally prohibited. The committee has the authority to reject any late
submission and the student will not be allowed to present his/her FYP2.
27
4.1.6 FYP2 Presentation Week
FYP2 presentation week is one the most important milestone in FYP2. Students will present
their FYP2 outcome and will be evaluated by a panel of two (2) evaluators / examiners appointed by
the FYP Committee. The FYP committee will release the presentation schedule a week earlier and all
sessions are open for everyone to attend. The guidelines and procedures for FYP2 presentation are
detailed out in section 4.1.9.
4.1.7 FYP2 Report Correction
At the end of the FYP2 presentation, students will receive a comment or suggestion form from
the examiners. Students are then required to do correction based on the comments. Students are
urged to discuss all comments with their supervisor and take appropriate actions. If required,
corrections made to the report must be endorsed by both supervisor and evaluators.
4.1.8 FYP2 Evaluation
At the end of the semester, each student’s project will be evaluated in determining
that the objectives and scope are adequate and are aligned. Details on the evaluation criteria are
explained in section 4.3.
4.1.9 FYP2 Presentation
Once the final report has been submitted, students need to prepare themselves for the
presentation and demo day. Unlike FYP1, the presentation for FYP2 is only 40 minutes (20 minutes
for slides presentation, 10 minutes for project demo and 10 minutes for the question and answer
session). Only include important points in the slide to make better use of the allocated time. The
presentation should contain the following items:
i. An introduction to introduce presenter, the project title, as well as the supervisor.
28
ii. An overview of the overall presentation (i.e. structure of the presentation, outline).
iii. Project background, aim, objectives, and scopes of the project (Chapter 1).
iv. Summary of literature review and methodology (Chapter 2 and Chapter 3).
v. An overview of design and implementation (Chapter 4).
vi. Summary of results and discussions (Chapter 5).
vii. Conclusion of the project (Chapter 6).
After the presentation, the students are required to demonstrate (demo) their projects. The
aim of the demo is to evaluate the functionalities of the prototype for system based project or to
verify the findings of a research based project. Related questions will be asked by the evaluators
during the demo session.
4.2 FYP2 Project Report
The final report is essential to FYP2. The early chapters, Chapters 1, 2 and 3, are similar to
FYP1. As part of their progress, students are required to submit drafts of Chapter 4 (Design and
Implementation), Chapter 5 (Results and Discussion) and Chapter 6 (Conclusion) to their supervisors
for evaluation. Corrections must be done as required. It is hoped that the quality of the student’s
project report is improved by having the ongoing report assessments. Regarding the draft of FYP2
report, the same report binding is applied as stated in section 3.2.5.
The final hard-bound thesis should be prepared after all the corrections based on comments
by evaluators and the supervisors are done. The color of thesis cover page is black and the font color
is gold. Please ensure that the endorsement forms are completed and submitted. Students must
prepare at least three (3) copies of hard-bound thesis (1 each for student, supervisor and UNIMY
library) and three (3) sets of DVD/CDs. The DVD/CDs must contain the following items:
i. Thesis document (format: doc/docx and pdf)
ii. Abstract (format: pdf)
iii. Prototype
iv. Source code
v. Poster
29
The failure to submit the thesis along with the DVD/CDs will result in the suspension of the
students’ results.
4.3 FYP2 Project Evaluation
4.3.1 Introduction
This section outlines evaluation criteria for FYP2. Students must read the following evaluation
criteria so that they are aware about the marking schemes and able to fulfill all the required
assessment criteria. The evaluation criteria listed in this section is applicable to both type of FYP –
development and research track.
4.3.2 FYP2 Evaluation Components
Evaluation of FYP2 is divided into 2 components – the supervisor and the evaluators with each
component carries 50% and 50% weightage respectively. In general, Table 4.1 shows the evaluation
criteria for FYP2.
Table 4.1: FYP2 Assessment Component
COMPONENT CRITERIA MARK TOTAL MARK WEIGHTAGE
Supervisor
Project Progress 10
100 S = 𝑥
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘 ∗ 50
Project Report 40
Project Product 40
Student Progress & Individual Attribute
10
Examiner 1 Project Report 40
100 E = 𝑥
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘 ∗ 50 Project Product 40
Examiner 2 Project Presentation 20
Grand Total S + E
30
APPENDIX A : PROJECT PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORM
FYP-F1-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A, D and F Supervisor : Please complete section B
Co-Supervisor : Please complete section C Evaluator : Please complete section E
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : …………………………………………...
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
SECTION B : SUPERVISOR CONSENT
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… agree/disagree* to be the supervisor of the above mentioned name student in his/her Final Year Project course.
DATE : ………………
SIGNATURE : ……………………………………………………………………
OFFICIAL STAMP :
SECTION C : CO-SUPERVISOR CONSENT (if applicable)
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… agree/disagree* to be the co-supervisor of the above mentioned name student in his/her Final Year Project course.
DATE : ………………
SIGNATURE : ……………………………………………………………………
OFFICIAL STAMP :
SECTION D : STUDENT DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this project is :
[ ] My own idea [ ] My supervisor’s idea / topic
DATE : ……………..
SIGNATURE : ……………………………………………………………………
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORM
FYP-F1-2017
SECTION E : EVALUATION PANEL
OUTCOME
[ ] Full Approval [ ] Conditional Approval (Minor) [ ] Conditional Approval (Major) [ ] Fail / Rejected
NOTE (Please state reasons for conditional / fail approval)
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... DATE : ……………..
PANEL SIGNATURE : ……………………………………………………………………
SECTION F : PROJECT DETAILS
Project Type
[ ] Development Track [ ] Research Track
Area : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Problem Background and Proposed Solution :
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
FYP-F1-2017
Objectives :
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Scopes :
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Project Methodology / Approach / Technique :
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Project Requirements :
Software : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Hardware : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
APPENDIX B : PROJECT REPORT SUBMISSION FORM
FYP-F2-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A Supervisor : Please complete section B
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : …………………………………………...
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
SECTION B : SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… declared that the student as mentioned in Section A is allowed to submit the Final Year Project 1 / 2 * report and to present his/her project to the evaluation panel.
DATE : ………………….. SIGNATURE : ……………………………………………………………………
OFFICIAL STAMP :
SECTION C : FINAL YEAR PROJECT COMMITTEE DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… declared to have accepted the following from the student as mentioned in Section A :
THREE (3) copies of Final Year Project 1 / 2* Report ONE (1) copy of Project Report Submission Form - (FYP-F2-2016) ONE (1) copy of Final Year Project 1 / 2* Supervisor Evaluation Form – (FYP-F3-2016) ONE (1) copy of Final Year Project 1 / 2* Examiner 1 Evaluation Form – (FYP-F4-2016) ONE (1) copy of Final Year Project 1 / 2* Examiner 2 Evaluation Form – (FYP-F5-2016)
DATE : …………………..
SIGNATURE : ……………………………………………………………………
FINAL YEAR PROJECT PROJECT REPORT SUBMISION FORM
APPENDIX C : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1) EVALUATION FORM -
SUPERVISOR
FYP-F3-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A. Please attach this form (blank except for Section A) together with the final report during submission to the Final Year Project Committee Supervisor : Please complete section B1-B8, C1-C5, D and E and return the completed form to the FYP Coordinator.
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : ………………………………………………....................
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
PROJECT REPORT (B1 - B8) SECTION B1 : CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Contents are wholly inadequate • Mismatched understanding of project
0 – 4
• Contents are adequate in some aspects but with major insufficiencies • Contents slightly reflect student’s understanding of the project
5 – 8
• Contents are clear and accurate • Contents fairly reflect student’s understanding of the project
9 – 12
• Contents are outstanding, well-written and exhibit no technical errors • Contents reflect student’s understanding of the project
13 – 15
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 EVALUATION FORM – SUPERVISOR
FYP-F3-2017
SECTION B2 : CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Limited or no investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Limited or no supporting literature
0 – 8
• Inadequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Insufficient number of supporting literature
9 – 16
• Adequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Satisfactory number of supporting literature but can be improved
17 – 24
• Outstanding investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Literature is adequate, relevant & clearly support the project
25 – 30
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B3 : CHAPTER 3 - METHODOLOGY
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Incorrect selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated and do not reflect project progression
0 – 7
• Inappropriate selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated & lacking or incomplete
8 – 14
• Appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are vaguely stated and insufficient to support the overall objectives of project
15 – 20
• Absolutely appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are clearly stated & well-defined • Adequately support the overall objectives of project
21 – 25
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F3-2017
SECTION B4 : CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no discussion of approaches to the problem, techniques, tools or principles relating to the problem area
0 – 2
• Inadequate discussion in many aspects but at least identifies more than one method of solving the problem
3 – 4
• Adequate discussion of the problem area, requirements, techniques, tools of solution but in no respect outstanding
5 – 7
• Outstanding analysis and discussion which identify the underlying principles behind the problem and give a fully justified statement of requirements as well as a full treatment of possible approaches to its solution & available tool or techniques
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B5 : CHAPTER 5 - CONCLUSION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• No comparison between the aims or purpose of the project 0 – 2
• Inadequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 3
• Adequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 4
• Outstanding comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F3-2017
SECTION B6 : WRITING STYLE AND FORMATTING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Does not follow thesis format • Figures and tables are not captioned and referred
0 – 2
• Slightly follow thesis format • Inappropriate use of figures and tables • Figures and tables are captioned but not referred
3 – 4
• Moderately follow thesis format • Appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are captioned and referred but with minor errors
5 – 7
• Completely follow thesis format • Absolutely appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are well-captioned and well-referred
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B7 : CITATION AND REFERENCING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no citation at all • Direct translation
0 – 2
• Minimal facts and information are cited • Slightly direct translation
3
• Adequate facts & information are cited but slightly irrelevant to the project • No direct translation
4
• Outstanding facts & information are cited and clearly declared or showed and relevant to the project • Strongly no direct translation
5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F3-2017
SECTION B8 : SUMMARY OF PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
B1 - Introduction / 15 12% / 12
B2 - Literature Review / 30 24% / 24
B3 - Methodology / 25 20% / 20
B4 - Analysis and Design / 10 8% / 8
B5 - Conclusion / 5 4% / 4
B6 - Writing Style and Formatting / 10 8% / 8
B7 - Citation and Referencing / 5 4% / 4
TOTAL MARKS / 100 80% / 80
STUDENT PROGRESS AND INDIVIDUAL ATTRIBUTE (C1 - C5) SECTION C1 : LOG BOOK
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Inadequate entry • Does not reflect project progress
0 – 5
• Entry every week • Fairly reflect project progress
6 – 10
• Meaningful entry every week • Reflects project progress
11 – 15
• Meaningful entry every week • Reflects project progress • Includes project plan
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F3-2017
SECTION C2 : MEETING FREQUENCY
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Hardly meet • Less than 2 times
0 – 8
• Meet less than 5 times 9 – 16
• Meet 5 times 17 – 24
• Meet more than 6 times 25 – 30
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C3 : WORK ETHIC
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Poor attitude • Poor communication with supervisor
0 – 8
• Fair attitude • Fair communication with supervisor
9 – 16
• Good attitude • Good communication with supervisor • Good relation with supervisor
17 – 24
• Very good attitude • Very good communication with supervisor • Very good relation with supervisor
25 – 30
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F3-2017
SECTION C4 : SELF-RELIANCE / INDEPENDENCE
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Highly dependent on supervisor 0 – 5
• Fairly dependent on supervisor 6 – 10
• Slightly dependent on supervisor • Able to solve problems with support
11 – 15
• Able to work independently • Able to plan and solve problems independently
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C5 : SUMMARY OF STUDENT PROGRESS AND INDIVIDUAL ATTRIBUTE EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
C1 - Log Book / 20 4% / 4
C2 - Meeting Frequency / 30 6% / 6
C3 - Work Ethic / 30 6% / 6
C4 - Self-Reliance / Independence / 20 4% / 4
TOTAL MARKS / 100 20% / 20
SECTION D : SUMMARY OF SUPERVISOR EVALUATION
EVALUATION MARK
B8 - Project Report / 80
C5 - Student Progress and Individual Attribute / 20
TOTAL MARKS / 100
SECTION E : SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… hereby declare to have evaluate the student as mentioned in Section A with utmost discretion and professionalism without any external interference nor personal preference. DATE : …………………………
SIGNATURE : …………………………………………………………………… OFFICIAL STAMP :
APPENDIX D : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1) EVALUATION FORM
– EXAMINER 1
FYP-F4-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A. Please attach this form (blank except for Section A) together with the final report during submission to the Final Year Project Committee Examiner 1 : Please complete section B1-B8 and C and return the completed form to the FYP Coordinator.
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : ………………………………………………....................
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
PROJECT REPORT (B1 - B8) SECTION B1 : ABSTRACT AND INTRODUCTION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• The abstract and introduction are wholly inadequate • Mismatched understanding of project
0 – 4
• The abstract and/or introduction are adequate in some aspects but with major insufficiencies • Contents slightly reflect student’s understanding of the project
5 – 8
• The abstract is clear and accurate • The introduction fairly reflects student’s understanding of the project
9 – 12
• The abstract and introduction are outstanding, well-written and exhibit no technical errors • Contents reflect student’s understanding of the project
13 – 15
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 1
FYP-F4-2017
SECTION B2 : LITERATURE REVIEW
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Limited or no investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Limited or no supporting literature
0 – 8
• Inadequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Insufficient number of supporting literature
9 – 16
• Adequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Satisfactory number of supporting literature but can be improved
17 – 24
• Outstanding investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Literature is adequate, relevant & clearly support the project
25 – 30
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B3 : METHODOLOGY
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Incorrect selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated and do not reflect project progression
0 – 7
• Inappropriate selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated & lacking or incomplete
8 – 14
• Appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are vaguely stated and insufficient to support the overall objectives of project
15 – 20
• Absolutely appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are clearly stated & well-defined • Adequately support the overall objectives of project
21 – 25
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F4-2017
SECTION B4 : ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no discussion of approaches to the problem, techniques, tools or principles relating to the problem area
0 – 2
• Inadequate discussion in many aspects but at least identifies more than one method of solving the problem
3 – 4
• Adequate discussion of the problem area, requirements, techniques, tools of solution but in no respect outstanding
5 – 7
• Outstanding analysis and discussion which identify the underlying principles behind the problem and give a fully justified statement of requirements as well as a full treatment of possible approaches to its solution & available tool or techniques
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B5 : CONCLUSION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• No comparison between the aims or purpose of the project 0 – 2
• Inadequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 3
• Adequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 4
• Outstanding comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F4-2017
SECTION B6 : WRITING STYLE AND FORMATTING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Does not follow thesis format • Figures and tables are not captioned and referred
0 – 2
• Slightly follow thesis format • Inappropriate use of figures and tables • Figures and tables are captioned but not referred
3 – 4
• Moderately follow thesis format • Appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are captioned and referred but with minor errors
5 – 7
• Completely follow thesis format • Absolutely appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are well-captioned and well-referred
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B7 : CITATION AND REFERENCING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no citation at all • Direct translation
0 – 2
• Minimal facts and information are cited • Slightly direct translation
3
• Adequate facts & information are cited but slightly irrelevant to the project • No direct translation
4
• Outstanding facts & information are cited and clearly declared or showed and relevant to the project • Strongly no direct translation
5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F4-2017
SECTION B8 : SUMMARY OF PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
B1 - Abstract and Introduction / 15 12% / 12
B2 - Literature Review / 30 24% / 24
B3 - Methodology / 25 20% / 20
B4 - Analysis and Design / 10 8% / 8
B5 - Conclusion / 5 4% / 4
B6 - Writing Style and Formatting / 10 8% / 8
B7 - Citation and Referencing / 5 4% / 4
TOTAL MARKS / 100 80% / 80
SECTION C : EXAMINER DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… hereby declare to have evaluate the student as mentioned in Section A with utmost discretion and professionalism without any external interference nor personal preference. DATE : …………………………
SIGNATURE : …………………………………………………………………… OFFICIAL STAMP :
APPENDIX E : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 (FYP1) EVALUATION FORM
– EXAMINER 2
FYP-F5-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A. Examiner 2 : Please complete section B1-B5 and C and return the completed form to the FYP Coordinator.
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : ………………………………………………....................
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
PROJECT PRESENTATION (B1 - B5) SECTION B1 : CLARITY OF PRESENTATION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Communication is unclear
Presentation is not organized 0 – 10
• Simple and fairly clear communication • Presentation is not well-organized
11 – 20
• Adequately clear communication • Presentation is well-organized but is not outstanding
21 – 30
• Strongly clear communication • Presentation is well-organized
31 – 40
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 2
FYP-F5-2017
SECTION B2 : QUESTION AND ANSWER HANDLING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Unable to answer questions • Does not event attempt to answer • Answers reflect lack of understanding of project
0 – 10
• Able to answer a few questions • Answers are sometimes incorrect or irrelevant to project objectives
11 – 20
• Able to answer most questions confidently and correctly • Think before answering • Answers reflect understanding of project
21 – 30
• Highly able to answer all questions confidently and correctly • Smartly think before answering • Answers reflects full understanding of project
31 – 40
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B3 : APPEARANCE
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Informally dressed which does not follow UniMy dress code 0 – 2
• Casually dressed 3 – 4
• Smartly dressed but attire partly follows UniMy dress code 5 – 7
• Smartly dressed which follows UniMy dress code 8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F5-2017
SECTION B4 : MANNERISM
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Impolite attitude and behavior 0 – 2
• Polite attitude and behavior 3 – 4
• Polite and well-mannered attitude and behavior 5 – 7
• Very polite and well-mannered attitude and behavior • Greets examiners
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B5 : SUMMARY OF COMPLETE PROJECT PRESENTATION EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
B1 - Clarity of Presentation / 40 8% / 8
B2 - Question and Answer Handling / 40 8% / 8
B3 - Appearance / 10 2% / 2
B4 - Mannerism / 10 2% / 2
TOTAL MARKS / 100 20% / 20
SECTION C : EXAMINER DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… hereby declare to have evaluate the student as mentioned in Section A with utmost discretion and professionalism without any external interference nor personal preference. DATE : …………………………
SIGNATURE : …………………………………………………………………… OFFICIAL STAMP :
APPENDIX F : FYP LOG BOOK
FYP-F6-2017
PROJECT TITLE
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
SECTION A : LOG BOOK TYPE
LOG BOOK : FYP 1 FYP 2
SECTION B : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………… STUDENT ID : …………………………………..
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…………………………..
SECTION C : SUPERVISOR INFORMATION
SUPERVISOR #1 : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
SUPERVISOR #2 : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
FINAL YEAR PROJECT STUDENT LOG BOOK
FYP-F6-2017
LOG BOOK NOTES
1. This log book need to be used by FYP1 and FYP2 students for the purpose of
reporting all progress made in the project.
2. It is the responsibility of the student to keep the log book updated. All suggestions, ideas,
comments and instructions given by the supervisor need to be recorded in the log book and
to be complied in the project.
3. It is compulsory for the student to have a regular meeting with his/her supervisor. A minimum
of 6 meeting is required for each FYP.
4. The FYP Committee and / or the supervisor have the right not to allow or not to recommend
the student to present his work in FYP Presentation Week if the progress if student’s progress
does not achieve the minimum requirement set for FYP.
5. This log book has to be submitted together with the FYP report as stated in the Final Year
Project Handbook.
6. The Faculty of Computing reserves right not to accept thesis/report for examination
if this log book is not properly documented.
FINAL YEAR PROJECT STUDENT LOG BOOK
FYP-F6-2017
LOG BOOK
FYP Type [ ] FYP 1 [ ] FYP 2
Date : …….. / ……… / ………. MEETING : 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / …………………….
Student (Meeting Minute/ Achievements/ Activities)
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Supervisor (Suggestion& Comments)
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Next Meeting Plan
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Supervisor Signature : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
FINAL YEAR PROJECT STUDENT LOG BOOK
APPENDIX G : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) PROJECT PROGRESS
EVALUATION FORM - SUPERVISOR
FYP-F7-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A. Supervisor : Please complete section B1-B4 and C and return the completed form to the FYP Coordinator.
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : ………………………………………………....................
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
PROJECT PROGRESS (B1 - B4) SECTION B1 : MILESTONE ACHIEVED
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Very Poor 0 – 8
Poor 9 – 16
Satisfactory 17 – 24
Good 25 – 32
Very Good 33 - 40
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 PROJECT PROGRESS EVALUATION FORM – SUPERVISOR
FYP-F7-2017
SECTION B2 : PROJECT EXECUTION FOLLOWS PLANNING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Very Poor 0 – 8
Poor 9 – 16
Satisfactory 17 – 24
Good 25 – 32
Very Good 33 - 40
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B3 : KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL IMPROVEMENT
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Very Poor 0 – 4
Poor 5 – 8
Satisfactory 9 – 12
Good 13 – 16
Very Good 17 - 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F7-2017
SECTION B4 : SUMMARY OF COMPLETE PROJECT PROGRESS EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
B1 - Milestone Achieved / 40 4% / 4
B2 - Project Execution Follows Planning / 40 4% / 4
B3 - Knowledge and Skill Improvement / 20 2% / 2
TOTAL MARKS / 100 10% / 10
SECTION C : SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… hereby declare to have evaluate the student as mentioned in Section A with utmost discretion and professionalism without any external interference nor personal preference. DATE : …………………………
SIGNATURE : …………………………………………………………………… OFFICIAL STAMP :
APPENDIX H : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) EVALUATION FORM –
SUPERVISOR
FYP-F8-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A. Please attach this form (blank except for Section A) together with the final report during submission to the Final Year Project Committee Supervisor : Please complete section B1-B8, C1-C7, D1-D5, E and F and return the completed form to the FYP Coordinator.
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : ………………………………………………....................
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
PROJECT REPORT (B1 – B8) SECTION B1 : ABSTRACT AND INTRODUCTION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• The abstract and introduction are wholly inadequate • Mismatched understanding of project
0 – 2
• The abstract and/or introduction are adequate in some aspects but with major insufficiencies • Contents slightly reflect student’s understanding of the project
3 – 4
• The abstract is clear and accurate • The introduction fairly reflects student’s understanding of the project
5 – 7
• The abstract and introduction are outstanding, well-written and exhibit no technical errors • Contents reflect student’s understanding of the project
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 EVALUATION FORM – SUPERVISOR
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION B2 : LITERATURE REVIEW
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Limited or no investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Limited or no supporting literature
0 – 5
• Inadequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Insufficient number of supporting literature
6 – 10
• Adequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Satisfactory number of supporting literature but can be improved
11 – 15
• Outstanding investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Literature is adequate, relevant & clearly support the project
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B3 : METHODOLOGY
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Incorrect selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated and do not reflect project progression
0 – 2
• Inappropriate selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated & lacking or incomplete
3 – 4
• Appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are vaguely stated and insufficient to support the overall objectives of project
5 – 7
• Absolutely appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are clearly stated & well-defined • Adequately support the overall objectives of project
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION B4 : DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no discussion of approaches to the problem, techniques, tools or principles relating to the problem area
0 – 5
• Inadequate discussion in many aspects but at least identifies more than one method of solving the problem
6 – 10
• Adequate discussion of the problem area, requirements, techniques, tools of solution but in no respect outstanding
11 – 15
• Outstanding analysis and discussion which identify the underlying principles behind the problem and give a fully justified statement of requirements as well as a full treatment of possible approaches to its solution & available tool or techniques
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B5 : RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Inadequate results and discussion of the problem solution 0 – 5
• Adequate results and discussion of the problem solution in some respects but fails to address important aspects of the process
6 – 10
• Adequate results and discussion of the problem solution in all respects and outstanding in some respect.
11 – 15
• Outstanding results and discussion of the problem solution which explores all aspects of the application of methods/tools used
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION B6 : CONCLUSION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• No comparison between the aims or purpose of the project 0 – 2
• Inadequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 3
• Adequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 4
• Outstanding comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B7 : WRITING STYLE AND FORMATTING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Does not follow thesis format • Figures and tables are not captioned and referred
0 – 2
• Slightly follow thesis format • Inappropriate use of figures and tables • Figures and tables are captioned but not referred
3 – 4
• Moderately follow thesis format • Appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are captioned and referred but with minor errors
5 – 7
• Completely follow thesis format • Absolutely appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are well-captioned and well-referred
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION B8 : CITATION AND REFERENCING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no citation at all • Direct translation
0 – 2
• Minimal facts and information are cited • Slightly direct translation
3
• Adequate facts & information are cited but slightly irrelevant to the project • No direct translation
4
• Outstanding facts & information are cited and clearly declared or showed and relevant to the project • Strongly no direct translation
5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B9 : SUMMARY OF PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
B1 - Abstract and Introduction / 10 4% / 4
B2 - Literature Review / 20 8% / 8
B3 - Methodology / 10 4% / 4
B4 - Design and Implementation / 20 8% / 8
B5 - Results and Discussion / 20 8% / 8
B6 - Conclusion and Recommendations / 5 2% / 2
B7 - Writing Style and Formatting / 10 4% / 4
B8 - Citation and Referencing / 5 2% / 2
TOTAL MARKS / 100 40% / 40
FYP-F8-2017
PROJECT PRODUCT (C1 – C7) SECTION C1 : FULFILL OBJECTIVES
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Does not fulfill objectives of the project 0 – 5
Slightly fulfill objectives of the project 6 – 10
Fairly fulfill objectives of the project 11 – 15
Fulfill all the objectives of the project 16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C2 : PROGRAMMING / EXPERIMENT
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Does not follow coding standards
Limited/no experiments
Limited/no understanding of coding/experiment
0 – 5
Slightly follow coding standards
Slightly amount of experiments
Slightly understand coding/experiment
6 – 10
Fairly follow coding standards
Fairly extensive experiments
Fairly understand coding/experiment
11 – 15
Follow coding standards
Extensive experiments
Clearly understand coding/experiment
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION C3 : COMPLETENESS
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Limited/no modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Limited/no modules integration 0 – 5
Slightly amount of modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Slightly modules integration 6 – 10
Fairly all modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Fairly modules integration 11 – 15
All modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Fully modules integration 16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C4 : CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Has no commercial value
Does not have any effect on quality of life / quality of service 0 – 4
Has commercial value
Can increase quality of life
Can better quality of service (Meet any 1 of 3)
5 – 8
Has commercial value
Can increase quality of life
Can better quality of service (Meet any 2 of 3)
9 – 12
Has commercial value
Can increase quality of life
Can better quality of service (Meet all requirements)
13 – 15
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION C5 : TESTING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Limited/no testing and validation 0 – 4
Slightly amount of testing and validation 5 – 8
Fairly complete testing and validation 9 – 12
Complete testing and validation 13 – 15
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C6 : CREATIVITY / INTERFACE DESIGN
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Limited/no interface design
Does not reflect project objectives and user requirement 0 – 2
Slightly has interface design
Slightly reflects project objectives and user requirement 3 – 4
Fairly has interface design
Fairly reflects project objectives and user requirement 5 – 7
Fully completed interface design
Fully reflects project objectives and user requirement 8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION C7 : SUMMARY OF PROJECT PRODUCT EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
C1 - Fulfill Objectives / 20 8% / 8
C2 - Programming / Experiment / 20 8% / 8
C3 - Completeness / 20 8% / 8
C4 - Contribution to Knowledge / 15 6% / 6
C5 - Testing / 15 6% / 6
C6 – Creativity / Interface Design / 10 4% / 4
TOTAL MARKS / 100 40% / 40
STUDENT PROGRESS AND INDIVIDUAL ATTRIBUTE (D1 - D5) SECTION D1 : LOG BOOK
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Inadequate entry • Does not reflect project progress
0 – 5
• Entry every week • Fairly reflect project progress
6 – 10
• Meaningful entry every week • Reflects project progress
11 – 15
• Meaningful entry every week • Reflects project progress • Includes project plan
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION D2 : MEETING FREQUENCY
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Hardly meet • Less than 2 times
0 – 8
• Meet less than 5 times 9 – 16
• Meet 5 times 17 – 24
• Meet more than 6 times 25 – 30
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION D3 : WORK ETHIC
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Poor attitude • Poor communication with supervisor
0 – 8
• Fair attitude • Fair communication with supervisor
9 – 16
• Good attitude • Good communication with supervisor • Good relation with supervisor
17 – 24
• Very good attitude • Very good communication with supervisor • Very good relation with supervisor
25 – 30
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F8-2017
SECTION D4 : SELF-RELIANCE / INDEPENDENCE
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Highly dependent on supervisor 0 – 5
• Fairly dependent on supervisor 6 – 10
• Slightly dependent on supervisor • Able to solve problems with support
11 – 15
• Able to work independently • Able to plan and solve problems independently
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION D5 : SUMMARY OF STUDENT PROGRESS AND INDIVIDUAL ATTRIBUTE EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
D1 - Log Book / 20 2% / 2
D2 - Meeting Frequency / 30 3% / 3
D3 - Work Ethic / 30 3% / 3
D4 - Self-Reliance / Independence / 20 2% / 2
TOTAL MARKS / 100 10% / 10
SECTION E : SUMMARY OF EXAMINER EVALUATION
EVALUATION MARK
B9 - Project Report / 40
C7 - Project Product / 40
D5 - Student Progress and Individual Attribute / 10
TOTAL MARKS / 90
SECTION F : EXAMINER DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… hereby declare to have evaluate the student as mentioned in Section A with utmost discretion and professionalism without any external interference nor personal preference. DATE : …………………………
SIGNATURE : …………………………………………………………………… OFFICIAL STAMP :
APPENDIX I : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) EVALUATION FORM –
EXAMINER 1
FYP-F9-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A. Please attach this form (blank except for Section A) together with the final report during submission to the Final Year Project Committee Examiner 1 : Please complete section B1-B8, C1-C7, D and E and return the completed form to the FYP Coordinator.
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : ………………………………………………....................
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
PROJECT REPORT (B1 – B8) SECTION B1 : ABSTRACT AND INTRODUCTION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• The abstract and introduction are wholly inadequate • Mismatched understanding of project
0 – 2
• The abstract and/or introduction are adequate in some aspects but with major insufficiencies • Contents slightly reflect student’s understanding of the project
3 – 4
• The abstract is clear and accurate • The introduction fairly reflects student’s understanding of the project
5 – 7
• The abstract and introduction are outstanding, well-written and exhibit no technical errors • Contents reflect student’s understanding of the project
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 1
FYP-F9-2017
SECTION B2 : LITERATURE REVIEW
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Limited or no investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Limited or no supporting literature
0 – 5
• Inadequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Insufficient number of supporting literature
6 – 10
• Adequate investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Satisfactory number of supporting literature but can be improved
11 – 15
• Outstanding investigation of existing systems / techniques / hardware / software • Literature is adequate, relevant & clearly support the project
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B3 : METHODOLOGY
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Incorrect selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated and do not reflect project progression
0 – 2
• Inappropriate selection of methodology • Phases are not clearly stated & lacking or incomplete
3 – 4
• Appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are vaguely stated and insufficient to support the overall objectives of project
5 – 7
• Absolutely appropriate selection of methodology • Phases are clearly stated & well-defined • Adequately support the overall objectives of project
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F9-2017
SECTION B4 : DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no discussion of approaches to the problem, techniques, tools or principles relating to the problem area
0 – 5
• Inadequate discussion in many aspects but at least identifies more than one method of solving the problem
6 – 10
• Adequate discussion of the problem area, requirements, techniques, tools of solution but in no respect outstanding
11 – 15
• Outstanding analysis and discussion which identify the underlying principles behind the problem and give a fully justified statement of requirements as well as a full treatment of possible approaches to its solution & available tool or techniques
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B5 : RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Inadequate results and discussion of the problem solution 0 – 5
• Adequate results and discussion of the problem solution in some respects but fails to address important aspects of the process
6 – 10
• Adequate results and discussion of the problem solution in all respects and outstanding in some respect.
11 – 15
• Outstanding results and discussion of the problem solution which explores all aspects of the application of methods/tools used
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F9-2017
SECTION B6 : CONCLUSION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• No comparison between the aims or purpose of the project 0 – 2
• Inadequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 3
• Adequate comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 4
• Outstanding comparison between the main aims or purpose of the project 5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B7 : WRITING STYLE AND FORMATTING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Does not follow thesis format • Figures and tables are not captioned and referred
0 – 2
• Slightly follow thesis format • Inappropriate use of figures and tables • Figures and tables are captioned but not referred
3 – 4
• Moderately follow thesis format • Appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are captioned and referred but with minor errors
5 – 7
• Completely follow thesis format • Absolutely appropriate use of figures and tables • Figures & tables are well-captioned and well-referred
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F9-2017
SECTION B8 : CITATION AND REFERENCING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Lack or no citation at all • Direct translation
0 – 2
• Minimal facts and information are cited • Slightly direct translation
3
• Adequate facts & information are cited but slightly irrelevant to the project • No direct translation
4
• Outstanding facts & information are cited and clearly declared or showed and relevant to the project • Strongly no direct translation
5
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B9 : SUMMARY OF PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
B1 - Abstract and Introduction / 10 4% / 4
B2 - Literature Review / 20 8% / 8
B3 - Methodology / 10 4% / 4
B4 - Design and Implementation / 20 8% / 8
B5 - Results and Discussion / 20 8% / 8
B6 - Conclusion and Recommendations / 5 2% / 2
B7 - Writing Style and Formatting / 10 4% / 4
B8 - Citation and Referencing / 5 2% / 2
TOTAL MARKS / 100 40% / 40
FYP-F9-2017
PROJECT PRODUCT (C1 – C7) SECTION C1 : FULFILL OBJECTIVES
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Does not fulfill objectives of the project 0 – 5
Slightly fulfill objectives of the project 6 – 10
Fairly fulfill objectives of the project 11 – 15
Fulfill all the objectives of the project 16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C2 : PROGRAMMING / EXPERIMENT
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Does not follow coding standards
Limited/no experiments
Limited/no understanding of coding/experiment
0 – 5
Slightly follow coding standards
Slightly amount of experiments
Slightly understand coding/experiment
6 – 10
Fairly follow coding standards
Fairly extensive experiments
Fairly understand coding/experiment
11 – 15
Follow coding standards
Extensive experiments
Clearly understand coding/experiment
16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F9-2017
SECTION C3 : COMPLETENESS
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Limited/no modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Limited/no modules integration 0 – 5
Slightly amount of modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Slightly modules integration 6 – 10
Fairly all modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Fairly modules integration 11 – 15
All modules function correctly and meet project requirement
Fully modules integration 16 – 20
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C4 : CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Has no commercial value
Does not have any effect on quality of life / quality of service 0 – 4
Has commercial value
Can increase quality of life
Can better quality of service (Meet any 1 of 3)
5 – 8
Has commercial value
Can increase quality of life
Can better quality of service (Meet any 2 of 3)
9 – 12
Has commercial value
Can increase quality of life
Can better quality of service (Meet all requirements)
13 – 15
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F9-2017
SECTION C5 : TESTING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Limited/no testing and validation 0 – 4
Slightly amount of testing and validation 5 – 8
Fairly complete testing and validation 9 – 12
Complete testing and validation 13 – 15
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION C6 : CREATIVITY / INTERFACE DESIGN
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Limited/no interface design
Does not reflect project objectives and user requirement 0 – 2
Slightly has interface design
Slightly reflects project objectives and user requirement 3 – 4
Fairly has interface design
Fairly reflects project objectives and user requirement 5 – 7
Fully completed interface design
Fully reflects project objectives and user requirement 8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F9-2017
SECTION C7 : SUMMARY OF PROJECT PRODUCT EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
C1 - Fulfill Objectives / 20 8% / 8
C2 - Programming / Experiment / 20 8% / 8
C3 - Completeness / 20 8% / 8
C4 - Contribution to Knowledge / 15 6% / 6
C5 - Testing / 15 6% / 6
C6 – Creativity / Interface Design / 10 4% / 4
TOTAL MARKS / 100 40% / 40
SECTION D : SUMMARY OF EXAMINER EVALUATION
EVALUATION MARK
B9 - Project Report / 40
C7 - Project Product / 40
TOTAL MARKS / 40
SECTION E : EXAMINER DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… hereby declare to have evaluate the student as mentioned in Section A with utmost discretion and professionalism without any external interference nor personal preference. DATE : …………………………
SIGNATURE : …………………………………………………………………… OFFICIAL STAMP :
APPENDIX J : FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 (FYP2) EVALUATION FORM –
EXAMINER 2
FYP-F10-2017
Instructions Students : Please complete section A. Examiner 2 : Please complete section B1-B5 and C and return the completed form to the FYP Coordinator.
SECTION A : STUDENT INFORMATION
NAME : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PROGRAM : …………….………………………………….………….. STUDENT ID : ………………………………………………....................
SEMESTER : JANUARY / APRIL / AUGUST ………………………………………….…..
PROJECT TITLE : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
PROJECT PRESENTATION (B1 - B5) SECTION B1 : CLARITY OF PRESENTATION
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
Communication is unclear
Presentation is not organized 0 – 10
• Simple and fairly clear communication • Presentation is not well-organized
11 – 20
• Adequately clear communication • Presentation is well-organized but is not outstanding
21 – 30
• Strongly clear communication • Presentation is well-organized
31 – 40
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2 EVALUATION FORM – EXAMINER 2
FYP-F10-2017
SECTION B2 : QUESTION AND ANSWER HANDLING
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Unable to answer questions • Does not event attempt to answer • Answers reflect lack of understanding of project
0 – 10
• Able to answer a few questions • Answers are sometimes incorrect or irrelevant to project objectives
11 – 20
• Able to answer most questions confidently and correctly • Think before answering • Answers reflect understanding of project
21 – 30
• Highly able to answer all questions confidently and correctly • Smartly think before answering • Answers reflects full understanding of project
31 – 40
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B3 : APPEARANCE
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Informally dressed which does not follow UniMy dress code 0 – 2
• Casually dressed 3 – 4
• Smartly dressed but attire partly follows UniMy dress code 5 – 7
• Smartly dressed which follows UniMy dress code 8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FYP-F10-2017
SECTION B4 : MANNERISM
CATEGORY MARK RANGE MARK
• Impolite attitude and behavior 0 – 2
• Polite attitude and behavior 3 – 4
• Polite and well-mannered attitude and behavior 5 – 7
• Very polite and well-mannered attitude and behavior • Greets examiners
8 – 10
Please justify the marks awarded: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
SECTION B5 : SUMMARY OF COMPLETE PROJECT PRESENTATION EVALUATION
CRITERIA MARK WEIGHTING WEIGHTED MARK
B1 - Clarity of Presentation / 40 8% / 8
B2 - Question and Answer Handling / 40 8% / 8
B3 - Appearance / 10 2% / 2
B4 - Mannerism / 10 2% / 2
TOTAL MARKS / 100 20% / 20
SECTION C : EXAMINER DECLARATION
I ………………………..……………………………………………….………… hereby declare to have evaluate the student as mentioned in Section A with utmost discretion and professionalism without any external interference nor personal preference. DATE : …………………………
SIGNATURE : …………………………………………………………………… OFFICIAL STAMP : ……………………………………………………………………