Handholding support to Smart Cities

Experiences & Learning

Session: Parking Infrastructure & Management for Smart Cities Smart City Expo 12th May 2017 Pragati Maidan, New Delhi

Presented by : Ruchita Bansal Manager (Urban) ICLEI- South Asia

SMART CITY MISSION: RECAP

People at Center

Local Innovation

Use of Technology

ICT / Automation

Self Financing

Result Oriented

Integrated Thinking

Smart City Concept

Gradual Up-scaling

Phase Wise Development

Public Participation

Financially Sustainable

Sustainability indicators for Smart City Projects

Public Consultation

Vision & Plan

State of Rajasthan

State of Andhra Pradesh

Kakinada Vishakhapatnam

Sustainable Built

Environment

Urban Mobility

Parking Management Plan

Junction Improvement

E-Rickshaw Action Plan

Deployment of City Bus service

Multi-modal integration

Integrated Implementation action plan

Building energy efficiency

City Roof-top solar plan

Heritage Conservation

Compact development: Densification

Udaipur Jaipur

HANDHOLDING SUPPORT : COVERAGE

Parking Management Plan

Junction Improvement

E-Rickshaw Action Plan

Deployment of City Bus service

Multi-modal integration

Urban Mobility

Sustainable Built Environment

Building energy efficiency

City Roof-top solar plan

Urban Renewal: Densification /

Heritage Conservation

Udaipur Jaipur Kakinada Vizag

Intro discussions Initial presentations Proposal stage DPR/Tender Implementation

HANDHOLDING SUPPORT : Level of engagement

Learning

Integrated development

Smart Interventions

Gradual up-scaling

Standalone Projects

Focus on large projects and greater visibility

Isolated pilot level planning

- A sequential layering of various projects is much needed for resource efficient implementation

- Cities must have a pan city vision while implementing pilot or ABD projects such that small projects compliments each other at city wide scale

- Urban interventions must be supported by laws and policies facilitating implementation and sustainability in long term

SMART CITY MISSION

Vis

ion

Imp

lem

en

tation

HANDHOLDING SUPPORT : Overall Experience

Parking Management strategies: Udaipur

6

MOBILITY PROFILE: Udaipur

Source: LCMP Udaipur

• Two-wheelers constitute a majority at 78

per cent of total registered vehicles in

Udaipur

• 50% of the total trips are using 2 wheelers

• But the share of public transport is also

declining, leading to more usage of private

vehicles and increased demand for parking

of private vehicles

vehicles in

wheelers

is also

private

parking

Walk 48%

Cycle 2%

2 Wheelers 35%

Car 4%

IPT 10%

Buses/ Others 2%

Trips by Mode

8

On-street parking is a crucial issue in Udaipur

Currently On- Street parking is crucial issue in Udaipur

Under the SCP proposal

• MLCPs are proposed in Area Based Proposal and as Smart Parking

• ITS enabled Parking Management System as a part of Pan City Proposal

9

PRESENT SITUATION

But presently the basic parking infrastructure (parking markings, bays, sign boards, etc.)

& strategies (parking pricing, maximum parking duration etc.) are missing,

Dense commercial Areas like Bapu Bazaar, Ashwini Bazaar etc. requires

immediate attention and more importantly immediate ACTION!!

Project stretch: 2 Kms (from Surajpole to Hatipole)

450 2300

100 150

120 authorized car parks Cars

Cycles Auto

Bikes

15200 sq. m . land

under encroachment

Vs.

Introduction- Stretch under Pilot Intervention

• Delhi Gate to Hathipole via Ashwini

Bazaar street (approx. 900 M)

• most significant of the peripheral corridor

containing old city;

• On- street parking throughout road length and

discontinuous pedestrian movement;

• Severe impact on RoW for smooth mobility of

pedestrian and vehicles;

• Constitute major economic centers

(Vegetable/ Fruit Market near Taiyabah

School, Textile and Auto parts Establishments,

Educational Institutes like Taiyabah School)

• High parking Demand due to-

Vegetable/ Fruit Market near Taiyabah School

Textile and Auto parts Establishments

MB Hospital

Educational Institutes like Taiyabah School

11

Approach- Pilot Intervention from Delhi Gate to Hathi Pole

Delhi Gate

Hathi Pole

Delhi Gate: one of the important junction of the city, the transition

zone between the Walled city and the new city, has designated space

for 4 Wheelers in and around the junction but very haphazard Two

Wheelers and Auto Rickshaws parking near to junction leading to

severe congestion around the junction

Hathi Pole

Junction

Delhi Gate

Junction

Hathi Pole: one of the junction leading to Walled City, has designated space for 4 Wheelers, but haphazard Two Wheelers and Auto Rickshaws parking

The corridor is approximately 900 M in length and has highest demand for 4 Wheelers parking which constitutes

around 30% of road space

The corridor is also notorious for haphazard two wheelers and auto rickshaws parking near to both the

junctions

It has around 230 cars, 900 two wheelers and 50 Autos parked on regular

weekdays in working hours

The corridor has designated car spaces only for 70- 80 cars

Exclusive stretch for initial demonstration of

the first ever on- street parking

management system in Udaipur

Introduction- Stretch under Pilot Intervention

13

Existing Parking Situation at Pilot Corridor

Parking in Early Morning vs Parking in Peak Hours

Morning Parking

Morning Parking

Peak Hour Parking

Peak Hour Parking

50 Cars

160

Two

Wheelers

During

Morning

hours

230 Cars

900

Two

Wheelers

During

Peak

Hours

High number of vehicles creates widely recognised problems, such as:

serious deficit in the number of available parking places

Traffic congestion, particularly in peak hours due to on street parking

Peak hour parking demand of approx. 600 ECS

Reduced Right of way as well as vehicular lane due to inappropriate and haphazard parking on road.

Conflict between Pedestrian and vehicles

Air pollution, noise and disturbance to locals

Impact on the safety of all road

parking within crossroads causing traffic risks

commercial vehicles parked in the residential area

insufficient space disables transit of larger vehicles, such as fire vehicles and ambulance

15

Major Issues in the Pilot Corridor

Stakeholder Involvement

Collect and Analyze Parking Data

Develop a Parking Profile

Develop a parking Management Plan

Implementation and monitoring Plan

Street Design for improved traffic flow and make on street

parking more efficient

NEX

T ST

EPS

STRATEGY FOR PARKING MANAGEMENT & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

USERS ORIGIN and FREQUENCY of VISIT

17

• The user perception survey included 700 respondents who visit the pilot stretch

• More than 60% of trips are within 5 kms and

• 80% of the trips are by personalized vehicles and rest

by auto.

• The main access to the market is majorly through private vehicles

Source :Based on Primary Survey conducted by ICLEI

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0-5 kms 5-10 kms 10-20 kms 20-40 kms More than 40 kms

Trip Distance in Kms

• More than 70 % of users are occasional visitor with single visit in a month

• Only 22 % of user visit daily of which (Mostly

employees)

22%

8%

30%

40%

Daily Weekly Monthly Ocassionaly

Frequency of visit

ON STREET PARKING and WILLINGNESS TO WALK

18 Source :Based on Primary Survey conducted by ICLEI

• Almost 50 % of the Parking duration is more than 60 mins i.e. long term parking

• Only 22 % vehicle are parked for short duration

22%

33%

27%

18%

0-30 mins 30-60 mins 60-120 mins >120

Parking Time

• Almost 60 % are willing to walk 500 meters for assured off street parking

• Only 10 % willing to use off street parking more than 1000 m away

62%

28%

10%

500 m 500-1 kms >1.5 kms

Willingness to walk from off street parking location

WILLINGNESS TO PAY

19

69

26

4 1 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Rs. 5 Rs. 5-10 Rs. 10-30 >30

Willingness to pay per hour (4 wheeler)

85

9 5

1 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Rs. 5 Rs. 5-10 Rs. 10-30 >30

Willingness to pay per hour (2 wheeler)

• Pricing Strategy can be uses to divert on street parking towards off street .

• Almost more 70 % people may shift to off-street parking , if pricing is more than Rs10 per hour .

PROPOSED DESIGN INTERVENTION

Existing Situation

Proposed Design Intervention- Schematic

• Proposed parking for 50 cars and 300 two wheelers

• Carriageway line on both sides leaving clear 7.8 m space for two way movement of traffic.

• Footpaths space as per design, either marked or place temporary plastic cone bollards

• Zebra crossing marks on mid-sections and intersection points as per the design.

PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN

Mode Parking Pricing Hours

Two wheeler

Rs. 5 0-2 hours Rs. 10 2-3 hours Rs. 15 3-4 hours Rs. 25 4-6 hours Rs. 35 6-8 hours

Four wheeler Rs. 10 0-2 hours Rs. 15 2-3 hours Rs. 25 3-4 hours Rs. 35 4-6 hours Rs. 45 6-8 hours

21

Parking sites for both two wheelers and cars should be earmarked as “on-street—short-term” parking and managed by one agency deputed by the municipal corporation. The parking pricing is based on user willingness to pay and to control demand- supply cap. Parking pricing is proposed as: •Rs. 5 for initial two hours for two wheelers •Rs. 10 for initial two hours for four wheelers •Increment of Rs. 5 every hour after initial two hours for both the modes.

BEFORE

22

AFTER

Images of temporary constructions at Suraj pole

Existing situation Proposal

Regulation of existing legal parking spaces • Marking of parking lanes • Marking of areas with forbidden parking by both

road marking and signing, especially near crossroads

Implementation of Pricing Strategy

Developing new parking area (MLCP)

Enforcement of Parking interventions and monitoring

25

PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN: Long term strategy

Handheld Ticketing Units Parking Occupancy Sensors License Plate Recognition

PARKING ENFORCEMENT- SMART TECHNOLOGIES

Junction Improvement Planning Attributes.

Pedestrian Friendliness. Disabled Friendliness. Proper organised Traffic circulation. Signal Free Junction. Equity Of space For each And Every Road User. Provisions of Designated spaces for hawkers,

Non motorised traffic, Parking and Three wheeler auto- rickshaw Stands ( TSR bays).

Multilevel Car Parking with Ramp : OPTION-1

Total Capacity – 102 cars. Number of floors – 5 floors + 2 basements. Ground floor Capacity – 12 cars

Key Plan 28.80

29.49

Costing and Comparison (Multilevel Car Parking)

Ramp Parking Mechanised Parking - Puzzled Mechanised Parking – Robotic

Area/Floor in SQM

3004.85 Area/Floor in SQM

3601.8 Area/Floor in SQM

4438.3

Number of Floors

7 ( Above ground 5 + 2 Basement)

Number of Floors

5 Number of Floors

9

Cost Per Car (Basement) in Rs

18000 Cost Per Car (Basement) in Rs

0 Cost Per Car (Basement) in Rs

0

Cost Per car Per Floor in Rs

12000 Cost Per car Per Floor in Rs

40000 Cost Per car Per Floor in Rs

40000

Total Estimated Cost in Rs

5,62,73,429 5 crores Approx.

Total Estimated Cost

14,40,75,456 14 Crores Approx.

Total Estimated Cost

17,75,32,196 17crores Approx.

Exis

tin

g s

ce

na

rio

Pro

po

sed

co

nc

ep

tua

l

de

sig

n

• Continuous Footpath

• Segregated space for all road users

• Reorganised street activities

• Safe crossing facilities at grade

• Removed encroachments,

• Vending Zones

New and Improved Street Design

• Generating understanding towards smart urban interventions

• Expanding vision for ABD projects to a pan city level and pre-plan scale-up

• Finding inter-linkages and dependencies of various projects under SCM

• Sequencing and layering of projects to bring resource efficiency

• Developing Implementation strategy for smart city projects

Preparation of Smart city Action Plan

Thank you!