hesc 400 ch2

Upload: teenietinyyvonne4943

Post on 03-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    1/13

    1/25/

    11

    Models for Program Planningin Health Promotion

    PRECEDE-PROCEEDOther Models

    Models provide structure &organization for the planning process

    Many different models

    3

    Common elements, but differentlabels

    Must understand the Generalized

    Model for Program Planning

    4

    AssessingNeeds

    e ngGoalsandObjectives

    Deve op ngan

    Intervention

    Implementingthe

    Intervention

    the

    Results

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    2/13

    1/25/

    No perfect model

    Can be used in entirety, parts,

    combinations

    5

    Three Fs of program planning help usselect an appropriate model:

    Fluidity - steps are sequential

    Flexibility - adapt to needs of stakeholders

    Functionality - useful in improving healthconditions

    6

    PRECEDE predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling

    The PRECEDE-PROCEED Planning Model is the mostwidely used planning model, and has been used for

    MANY problems, populations, locations.

    8

    constructs in educational/ecological diagnosis &evaluation(Green & Kreuter, 2005, p. 9)

    Developed in the early 1970s

    PROCEED policy, regulatory, and organizationalconstructs in educational & environmentaldevelopment(Green & Kreuter, 2005, p. 9)

    Developed in the 1980s

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    3/13

    1/25/

    Created by:Lawrence W. Green &Marshall W. Kreuter

    Best known, most oftenused model

    10

    Theoretically grounded

    Comprehensive

    Found in manygovernment programs,eg, PATCH

    PRECEDE

    First 4 phases: Assessment

    1) social assessment2) epidemiological, behavioral, environmental assessment3) educational & ecological assessment

    11

    PROCEED

    Last 4 phases: Implementation and Evaluation

    5) implementation

    6) process evaluation

    7) impact evaluation

    8) outcome evaluation

    Underlying approach:

    Begin by identifying the desired outcome

    THEN determine what causes it

    THEN design an intervention to reach the desired

    12

    DO NOT START WITH:

    Health problem

    Desired program

    DO START WITH:

    Desired quality of life outcome

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    4/13

    1/25/

    1313

    Phase 1: Subjectively define QOL of thepriority population

    -

    15

    assessment of needs & aspirations

    Assessment:Identify (list)Describe (explain)

    Prioritize (rank)

    ProblemsProblems

    andand

    PrioritiesPriorities

    What are some examples of socialindicators of QOL?

    Achievement

    16

    Alienation

    Comfort

    Crime

    Happiness

    Self-esteem

    Unemployment

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    5/13

    1/25/

    Phase 2: Use data to identify & rank health issuesthat contribute to problems identified in Phase 1

    Data include:Vital Indicators

    E morbidit mortalit & disabilit data

    17

    . ., , ,

    GeneticRelationship between genes and health and behavior

    BehavioralRisky behaviors

    Environmental

    Things outside person that can be changed to impact health

    Rank:

    2 X 2 matrix

    MoreImportant

    LessImportant

    18

    oreChangeable

    LessChangeable

    Phase 3: Identifies factors that have potential toinfluence behavior or change the environment

    1. Predisposing factors

    Antecedent; impact motivation

    Eg: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, values

    21

    2. Enabling factors

    Antecedent; barriers & facilitators

    Eg: skills, access, availability, rules, laws

    3. Reinforcing factors

    Subsequent; +/- feedback

    Eg: social benefits like recognition, appreciation;incentives; disincentives

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    6/13

    1/25/

    Phase 4: Intervention Alignment

    Matches appropriate strategies & interventions

    with projected changes and outcomes

    22

    Phase 4: Administration & Policy Assessment

    Determine if capabilities & resources areavailable

    Transition to PROCEED

    Moving toward PROCEED, but not distinct break

    Phase 5: Have resources, selectintervention

    Strategies:

    24

    Communication

    Environmental change

    Beginning of PROCEED

    Program begins

    Phase 6: Process EvaluationMeasurements of implementation to control,assure, or improve the quality of the program

    Phase 7: Impact evaluationImmediate observable effects of ro ram

    25

    Phase 8: Outcome evaluationLong-term effects of the program

    Line up with PRECEDE

    Depends on evaluation requirements ofprogram

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    7/13

    1/25/

    26

    There are many other models besidesPRECEDE-PROCEED

    MATCH (Multilevel Approach to CommunityHealth)

    Developed in late 1980s

    27

    . .

    Applied when behavioral & environmental risk& protective factors for disease / injury areknown & general priorities determined

    Includes ecological planning: levels ofinfluence

    29

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    8/13

    1/25/

    Phase 1 Health Goals Section

    Select goals - consider prevalence, importance,changeability

    Select target population

    Identify behaviors associated with health status

    30

    Identify environmental factors (barriers & facilitators)

    Phase 2 - Intervention Planning

    Select intervention objectives

    Identify targets of intervention (TIAs)

    Select intervention approaches (ecological levels):governments, organizations, communities, individuals

    Phase 3 DevelopmentCreate program units or componentsCreate plans

    Phase 4 ImplementationAdoption

    31

    ImplementationMaintenance

    Phase 5 EvaluationConduct process evaluationMeasure impact

    Monitor outcome

    Decisions based on consumer input andinterests

    Based on concepts from:Health Communication strategies to

    32

    decisions (NCI, 2002)

    Social Marketing application of commercialmarketing technologies to the analysis, planning,execution, and evaluation of programs designed toinfluence the voluntary behavior of target[priority] audiences in order to improve theirpersonal welfare and that of their society(Andreasen, 1995, p. 7)

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    9/13

    1/25/

    33

    Developed by the Office ofCommunication at CDC in 1997

    First issued in 1998

    Developed for CDC public health

    34

    health communication

    Now available to public

    Developed for healthcommunication, but can be used

    with all health promotion planningAvailable on CD-ROM

    P 2: Analyze

    Problem (causes,

    P 3: Plan Intervention(Is communicationdominant orsupportive?)

    P 4: Develop

    Intervention

    P 5: Plan

    Evaluation

    P 6:

    Implement

    Plan

    35

    P 1: Describe

    Problem

    (identify &

    define)

    ,

    strategies

    There is also a supplemental resources CD for CDCynergy 3.0

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    10/13

    1/25/

    Plans to make CDCynergy web-based

    Several versions & more to come

    http://www.cdc.gov/communication/cdcynergy.htm

    36

    SMART (Social Marketing Assessment &Response Tool)

    Social marketing planning framework created byNeiger & Thackeray (1998)

    37

    Provides an excellent overview of social marketing

    Seven phases

    Heart of the model is Phases 2, 3, & 4; usually

    performed simultaneously

    P 1: PreliminaryPlanning [problem, name in terms of

    behavior, develop goals, project costs]

    P 2:

    Consumer Analysis [segmentpriority population, determine

    P 3:

    Market Analysis

    P 4:Channel Analysis

    [interpersonal, small group,

    38

    needs, wants, & preferences]; alsosecondary & tertiary audiences

    [4Ps, competitors,& partners]

    organizational, community,mass media]

    P 5: Developing Interventions, Materials, & Pretesting

    P 6: Implementation

    P 7: Evaluation

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    11/13

    1/25/

    Healthy People 2010

    (A systematicA roach to Health

    39

    Promotion)

    Components:Goals

    Objectives

    Determinants of health

    Health status

    MAPP (Mobilizing for Action through Planning& Partnerships)

    Relatively new; created by NACCHO for use bylocal public health agencies

    40

    Phases:Organizing for Success & Partnership Development

    Visioning

    Four MAPP Assessments

    Identify Strategic Issues

    Formulate Goals & StrategiesThe Action Cycle (Implement & Evaluate)

    MAPP:

    41

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    12/13

    1/25/

    APEX-PH (Assessment Protocol for Excellencein Public Health)

    Components: Organizational capacity, CommunityProcess, Completing the Cycle

    Developed by NACCHO for local health depts.

    42

    PACE-EH (Protocol for Assessing CommunityExcellence in Environmental Health)

    SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses,Opportunities, Threats)

    Minimizes planning time

    S W

    O

    T

    The Communication Model

    NCI, 2002

    Healthy Communities

    43

    (Healthy Cities) (USDHHS)

    Components: MobilizeAssess Plan for Action Implement Track Progress & Outcomes

    Healthy Plan-IT (CDC)

    Components:

    Priority Setting

    Establishin Goals

    44

    Outcome Objectives

    Strategy

    Evaluation

    Budget

  • 7/29/2019 HESC 400 Ch2

    13/13

    1/25/

    Intervention Mapping

    Relatively new 1998

    Plans programs that are based on theory &evidence

    Draws on PRECEDEPROCEED and MATCH

    45

    models

    Steps:1) Needs assessment2) Matrices of Change Objectives

    3) Theory-based methods and practical strategies4) Program5) Adoption and Implementation6) Evaluation Planning

    Comprehensive Health Education Model (Sullivan, 1973)

    Model for Health Education Planning (Ross & Mico, 1980)

    Model for Health Education Planning & ResourceDevelopment (Bates & Winder, 1984)

    46

    Planned Approach to Community Health (CDC, nd)

    Generic Health/Fitness Delivery System (Patton et al.,1986)

    The Planning, Program Development, and Evaluation

    Model (Timmreck, 2003)

    LOTS of models!

    All based on same generalized model

    PRECEDE-PROCEDE most commonCan mix and match

    48

    Which models are especially good for:Communication?

    Social Marketing?

    Partnerships?

    Environment issues?

    Multiple levels?