highlights from the math and science policy survey responses
DESCRIPTION
Highlights from the Math and Science Policy Survey Responses. Williamson Evers, Assistant Secretary, U.S Department of Education. Methodology. Topic Co-leaders, Japan and the United States, design and circulate survey to APEC representatives. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Highlights from the Math and Science
Policy Survey Responses
Williamson Evers,
Assistant Secretary,
U.S Department of Education
2
MethodologyTopic Co-leaders, Japan and the United States,
design and circulate survey to APEC representatives
APEC representatives coordinate responses with economy experts
Topic co-leaders receive responses from Canada, China, Chile, Japan, Indonesia, Chinese Taipei, NZ,
US*
Topic co-leaders prepare highlights
*Korea and Thailand also submitted responses that will be incorporated into future analysis
3
Math & Science Survey Organization
Standards and Coursetaking21st Century Competencies in StandardsObstacles to Improving Upper Secondary Level EducationAssessment
4
Parallel Sequenced
China
J apan
Canada
Chile
New Zealand
Chinese Taipei
U.S.
Q2.1: Math and Science Topics Taught as Parallel Or Sequenced Programs
5
A Single National Set
of Required Math &
Science Courses
Multiple Sets of
Nationally Required
Courses for Different
Diplomas
Multiple Sets of
Provincially
Required
Courses
Indonesia (Comp=12)
Chinese Taipei
(Comp=12)
Chile (Comp=12)
China (Comp=9)
J apan (Comp=LS)
New Zealand (Comp=11)
Canada (Variable)
U.S. (Comp=11)*
Q2.2, Q2.11: Central Government and Provincial Governments' Roles in Setting Math
& Science Course Requirements
Note: Comp = Compulsory, LS = Lower Secondary*At U.S. grade 11, a majority of states with course
requirements require at least 3 years of mathematics for graduation.
6Note: No answer from Canada and ChileNote: GR = Graduation Rate
L in E qQuad
E qL og E q T rig E q
Geo P ln
Geo. Analy
S tat C alc
China 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Chinese Taipei (GR=100%)
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0
Indonesia (GR=90%)
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
J apan (GR=100%)
100 100 87 87 79 87 87
N.Z. (GR=75%)
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
U.S. (GR=75%)
95 68 68 10 75 8 13
Q2.8: Percent of Upper Secondary Graduates Who Take the Following Mathematics Courses
7
Co
mp
Sci
ence
Bas
ic B
iolo
gy
Ad
v. B
iol
Ph
ysic
s
Ino
rg.
Ch
em
Org
. C
hem
Ear
th S
cien
ce
En
vir.
Sci
U.S. (GR=75%)
Japan (GR=100%)
China
0
25
50
75
100
U.S. (GR=75%)
Japan (GR=100%)
China
Q2.16b: Percent of Upper Secondary Students Taking the Following Science
Courses
Note: No answer from Canada, Chile, Indonesia, New Zealand, Chinese TaipeiNote: GR = Graduation RateNote: Blank represents no answer
8
Indicates competency already integrated into standards, O Indicates competency in consideration for integration
Note: No answer from Chile
Canada China Indonesia J apanNew
ZealandChineseTaipei
United States
Conceptual Understanding
Content Rigor
O OProcedural Skills(Computation/Lab)
Real WorldProblem Solving
New Math(Discrete, Fractals) O O O OAttitudes/Responsibilities O
Fewer Topics withGreater Depth
O O
Statistics and DataAnalyses
ExplainingSolutions
Discussion AmongStudents
Student-TeacherDiscussion O
Amount of Science inMath O O O OAmount ofGroup Work O O O
Ability to ThinkLogically
OAbility to DiscoverRules and Patterns
OUse of InformationTechnology
O
Q3.2: Competencies Identified for Integration into Math Standards
9
Canada China Indonesia J apanNew
ZealandChineseTaipei
United States
Conceptual Understanding
Content Rigor
Procedural Skills(Computation/Lab)
Real WorldProblem Solving
Attitudes/Responsibilities
Fewer Topics withGreater Depth
O O OStatistics and DataAnalyses
O OLaboratoryExperiments
ExplainingSolutions
Discussion AmongStudents
Student-TeacherDiscussion
OAmount of Mathin Science O O O O OAmount ofGroup Work
O
Ability to ThinkLogically
OAbility to DiscoverRules and Patterns
OUse of InformationTechnology
O O
Q3.2: Competencies Identified for Integration in Science Standards
Indicates competency already integrated into standards, O Indicates competency in consideration for integration
Note: No answer from Chile
10
Can
ada
Ch
ile
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Jap
an
New
Z
eala
nd
Ch
ines
eT
aip
ei
Un
ited
S
tate
s
Lack of
Interest
Lack of Qualified
Teachers
Inadequate
Foundation
Weak Conceptual
Understanding
Q4.1: Obstacles to Upper-SecondaryMathematics Improvement
11
Can
ada
Ch
ile
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Jap
an
New
Z
eala
nd
Ch
ines
eT
aip
ei
Un
ited
S
tate
s
Lack of
Interest
Lack of Qualified
Teachers
Inadequate
Foundation
Weak Conceptual
Understanding
Q4.2: Obstacles to Upper-SecondaryScience Improvement
12
Can
ada
Ch
ile
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Jap
an
New
Z
eala
nd
Ch
ines
eT
aip
ei
Un
ited
S
tate
s*
Summer
Training
Private Sector/
University Training
Online
Training
Sabbaticals
Q4.3: Mathematics Teacher Training Policies for Upper Secondary
*Varies by state
13
Can
ada
Ch
ile
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Jap
an
New
Z
eala
nd
Ch
ines
eT
aip
ei
Un
ited
S
tate
s*
Summer
Training
Private Sector/
University Training
Online
Training
Sabbaticals
Q4.4: Science Teacher Training Policies for Upper Secondary
*Varies by state
14
Can
ada
Ch
ile
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Jap
an
New
Z
eala
nd
Ch
ines
eT
aip
ei
Un
ited
S
tate
s
Assess for next
grade/academic level
Accountability for
teachers and schools
Assess of entrance
into upper-secondary
Assess for secondary
graduation
Assess for tertiary
education credit
Q5.2-6: Uses of Assessments at Primary and Secondary Levels
15
Report
ed
Pub. A
vail
Report
ed
Pub. A
vail
Report
ed
Pub. A
vail
Report
ed
Pub. A
vail
Report
ed
Pub. A
vail
Canada N N Y N Y N Y N
Chile
China Y N Y N Y N N Y N
Indonesia Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N
J apan N N N N N
New Zealand Y N Y N N N
Chinese Taipei Y N Y N Y N Y N
U.S. Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y
Q5.8: Reporting of Assessment Information
Students Teachers Schools Local Govt. Province
16
Can
ada
Ch
ile
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Jap
an
New
Z
eala
nd
Ch
ines
eT
aip
ei
Un
ited
S
tate
s
Rigor of Assessments O
Real-World Problems O
Students
Demonstrating/Explaining
Work
O
Disaggregated reporting by
student groups O
Benchmarking Diverse Local
Assessments
Provinces Publicly Report
Assessments by School O
School Accountability of
Student Performance
Increase Use of Online
Assessment O
Q5.10: Economy Priorities for Math Assessments
Indicates priority already integrated into assessments, O Indicates priority in consideration for integration, - Indicates no answer
17
Can
ada
Ch
ile
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Jap
an
New
Z
eala
nd
Ch
ines
eT
aip
ei
Un
ited
S
tate
s
Rigor of Assessments O
Real-World Problems O
Students
Demonstrating/Explaining
Work
O
Disaggregated reporting by
student groups O
Benchmarking Diverse Local
Assessments
Provinces Publicly Report
Assessments by School O
School Accountability of
Student Performance
Increase Use of Online
Assessment O O O
Q5.10: Economy Priorities for Science Assessments
Indicates priority already integrated into assessments, O Indicates priority in consideration for integration, - Indicates no answer
18
Q5.12: Economy Interest in Obtaining and Providing
Assessment Questions from Other Economies
• Respondents showed broad interest in an assessment bank and most have the capacity to provide assessment questions
19
Problem: Which park has the larger area (Difficult: 18% of Japanese students answered correctly).
Sample Assessment Item for Math: Japan Assessment, Grade 6
20
Problem. Angle of a circle (Easy: 86% of grade 9 students answered correctly).
Sample Assessment Item for Math: Japan Assessment, Grade 9
21
Sample Assessment Item for Math: Japan Assessment, Grade 6Problem Area of a rectangle. (Easy: 88% of Japanese grade 6 students answered correctly)
1. 5x3 + 3x9
2. 3x6 + 5x3
3. 6x9 - 3x5
4. 3x9 - 3x5
22
Problem: Reading a graph. (Easy 89% of grade 9 Japanese students answered correctly)
Problem: Reading a graph. (Easy 89% of grade 9 Japanese students answered correctly)
Sample Assessment Item for Math: Japan Assessment, Grade 9