hospital separations identification of records for use in tabulating of national injury data susan...
TRANSCRIPT
Hospital Hospital SeparationsSeparationsIdentification of Identification of
records for use in records for use in tabulating of tabulating of
national injury national injury datadata
Susan G. Mackenzie
Presented at the ICE meeting in Washington, September 2006
QuestionsQuestions
What approaches to identifying injury hospital separation records for national tabulation are used in different countries?
What are the results of the different approaches?
Should ICE recommend an approach?
Methods – Survey of Methods – Survey of approaches to record approaches to record
selectionselection Survey of ICE membersSurvey of ICE members
Which version of ICD is used for hospital Which version of ICD is used for hospital
separation data?separation data? Record identificationRecord identification
By Diagnosis or External cause code? or By Diagnosis or External cause code? or both?both?
All or selected?All or selected?
Tabulation by External cause?Tabulation by External cause? If yes, all or selected?If yes, all or selected?
15 responses received15 responses received
Methods – Analysis Methods – Analysis overviewoverview
Identify the different approaches Identify the different approaches used to select hospital separation used to select hospital separation records for tabulationrecords for tabulation
Apply each of the approaches to the Apply each of the approaches to the same set of hospital separation datasame set of hospital separation data
Compare the groups of records Compare the groups of records retrieved using the different retrieved using the different approachesapproaches Total numbers of recordsTotal numbers of records Numbers of particular types of injuries, Numbers of particular types of injuries,
classified by external causeclassified by external cause
Thanks for the Thanks for the informationinformation
AustraliaAustralia James Harrison James Harrison CanadaCanada Susan Mackenzie Susan Mackenzie ColombiaColombia Andrés Fandiño-Losado Andrés Fandiño-Losado Victor Hugo Victor Hugo Álvarez CastañoÁlvarez Castaño DenmarkDenmark Birthe Frimodt-Moller, Birthe Frimodt-Moller,
Jens LauritsenJens Lauritsen El Salvador El Salvador Oscar Salinas, Gerardo De Cosio Oscar Salinas, Gerardo De Cosio IsraelIsrael Limor Aharonson-Daniel Limor Aharonson-Daniel JamaicaJamaica Yvette Holder Yvette Holder The NetherlandsThe Netherlands Saakje Mulder Saakje Mulder New ZealandNew Zealand Colin Cryer, John Langley Colin Cryer, John Langley Trinidad and Tobago Roanna Morton-Williams Trinidad and Tobago Roanna Morton-Williams
BynoeBynoe United StatesUnited States Lois Fingerhut Lois Fingerhut
More thanksMore thanks
AfricaAfrica Olive KobusingyeOlive Kobusingye South AfricaSouth Africa Richard Matzopoulos Richard Matzopoulos JapanJapan Tatsuhiro YamanakaTatsuhiro Yamanaka European Union European Union Maria Segui-GomezMaria Segui-Gomez
Information from 11 countries and the EU study available for analysis
ICD version used to classify ICD version used to classify hospital separationshospital separations
ICD-10 ICD-9 ICD-9-CM ICD-10 modificationNetherlands Israel Colombia Australia
1 other EU United States Denmark Canada
5 EU El Salvador New Zealand
Jamaica
Trinidad and Tobago
16 other EU
Approaches used to identify Approaches used to identify
injury records – Diagnosisinjury records – Diagnosis Based on the principal, primary, Based on the principal, primary,
or first-listed, diagnosis code on or first-listed, diagnosis code on the recordthe record Use Use All records with any diagnosis in records with any diagnosis in
the Injury and Poisoning chapterthe Injury and Poisoning chapter Use selected records with a diagnosis Use selected records with a diagnosis
in the Injury and Poisoning chapterin the Injury and Poisoning chapter Community injuriesinjuries Trauma
Approaches used to identify Approaches used to identify injury records –External injury records –External
causecause Based on the first-listed Based on the first-listed
External cause on the recordExternal cause on the record Use Use All records with an External cause records with an External cause Use selected records with an External Use selected records with an External
causecause Exclude adverse effects (AE) Trauma
ICD codes used to identify ICD codes used to identify records for injury records for injury
hospitalization tabulationhospitalization tabulation Diagnosis codes External cause codes
All Selected All Selected
DNK AUS – community NLD CAN – trauma
COL ISR – trauma NZL CAN – Exclude AE
SLV USA – community
JAM
EU study
Methods – DatasetMethods – Dataset
Used Hospital Morbidity Database Used Hospital Morbidity Database from the Canadian Institute for from the Canadian Institute for Health InformationHealth Information
Initial selection:Initial selection: All acute care separations from one All acute care separations from one
Canadian province for fiscal year Canadian province for fiscal year 2000-01.2000-01.
N=126,217.N=126,217.
Methods – Record Methods – Record selectionselection
From the 126,217 acute care records From the 126,217 acute care records
Considered the primary diagnosis and the Considered the primary diagnosis and the first listed external cause and selected first listed external cause and selected records where:records where:
The The primary diagnosis was an injury or poisoning or poisoning (in chapter XVII of ICD-9) (in chapter XVII of ICD-9)
oror
There was an There was an external cause on the record..
14,77214,772 possible injury records were retrievedpossible injury records were retrieved
External cause on record
Present Not present
ICD
-9
ICD
-9 D
iag
no
sis
Dia
gn
os
is c
hap
ter
ch
apte
r
XV
II -
In
jury
& p
ois
on
ing
XV
II -
In
jury
& p
ois
on
ing
Oth
erO
ther
14,77214,772
04,499
(30%)
8,254
(56%)
2,019
(14%)
12,753 2,019
10,2
734,
499
14,77214,772
A B
C DC
Total records retained, by Total records retained, by approachapproach
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
Percentage of records Percentage of records retained where diagnosis is retained where diagnosis is not from the injury chapternot from the injury chapter
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
0 0 0
Distribution of non-injury Distribution of non-injury diagnoses when identification diagnoses when identification is based on external cause, by is based on external cause, by
approachapproach
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
V-cod
e
Circula
tory
Men
tal
GI
Mus
cske
l
Sympt
om
Neopl
asm
EC AllEC No AEEC Trauma
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of n
on
-inju
ry d
iagn
ose
s
ICD- 9 chapter
Numbers of all records and all Numbers of all records and all records with external causes, records with external causes,
by approachby approach
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
All records All records with externalcauses
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
Selected unintentional Selected unintentional external causes:external causes:Adverse effectsAdverse effects
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Adverse effects
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
0 0
Selected external causes:Selected external causes:All records, Unintentional All records, Unintentional
injuries, fallsinjuries, falls
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
All externalcauses
All unintentional
Falls
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
Selected unintentional Selected unintentional external causes:external causes:
Motor vehicle traffic crashes, Motor vehicle traffic crashes, Other transport, Fire/flamesOther transport, Fire/flames
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
MVTC Other transport Fire/ flames
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
Selected unintentional Selected unintentional external causes: external causes:
Poisoning, Natural & Poisoning, Natural & environmental, (near) environmental, (near)
DrowningDrowning
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Poisoning Natural &environmental
(near) Drowning
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
0
Selected unintentional Selected unintentional external causes:external causes:
Suffocation, Other foreign Suffocation, Other foreign bodiesbodies
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Suffocation Other Foreign bodies
DX AllDX CommunDX TraumaEC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
0 0
Selected external causes:Selected external causes:Other intentsOther intents
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Self-inflicted Assault Undetermined
DX AllDX CommunDX Trauma EC AllEC No adv effEC Trauma
ConclusionsConclusions
There is variation between and within There is variation between and within countries in capacity to classify injury countries in capacity to classify injury diagnoses and external causes for hospital diagnoses and external causes for hospital separation recordsseparation records
Where the information is available, the Where the information is available, the selection approach used can make an selection approach used can make an important difference in the number and important difference in the number and nature of injury records retrievednature of injury records retrieved
External cause approaches generally yield External cause approaches generally yield more records than the injury diagnosis more records than the injury diagnosis approachesapproaches
QuestionsQuestions Is there a preferred selection approach?Is there a preferred selection approach? Is there value in using different selection Is there value in using different selection
approaches for different purposes approaches for different purposes Acute injury occurrenceAcute injury occurrence Total burden of injuryTotal burden of injury
IssuesIssues Diagnosis vs. external cause as primary selection?Diagnosis vs. external cause as primary selection?
or possibly a combination of diagnosis and external or possibly a combination of diagnosis and external cause?cause?
If diagnosis: All, Community, Trauma, (Other)?If diagnosis: All, Community, Trauma, (Other)? If external cause: All, All but adverse effects, Trauma, If external cause: All, All but adverse effects, Trauma,
(Other)?(Other)? If other: what?If other: what?
References References Injury Surveillance Workgroup. Consensus Injury Surveillance Workgroup. Consensus
recommendations for using hospital discharge recommendations for using hospital discharge data for injury surveillance. Marietta (GA): data for injury surveillance. Marietta (GA): State and Territorial Injury Prevention State and Territorial Injury Prevention Directors Association; 2003.Directors Association; 2003.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended framework for presenting Recommended framework for presenting injury mortality data . MMWR 1997;46 (No. injury mortality data . MMWR 1997;46 (No. RR-14)RR-14)
Hospital separations due to injury and Hospital separations due to injury and poisoning, Australia 2001-02. Jesia Berry, poisoning, Australia 2001-02. Jesia Berry, James E. Harrison, March 2006, Australian James E. Harrison, March 2006, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.