how common manufacturing methods compare

30
Presented by Monarch Metal An overview of Additive, Subtractive, and Formative Manufacturing How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Upload: monarch-metal

Post on 15-Apr-2017

787 views

Category:

Engineering


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Presented by Monarch Metal

An overview of Additive, Subtractive, and Formative Manufacturing

How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Page 2: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

As more and more innovative technologies make their way to the general public, manufacturers are seeing the face of their industry change by the day.

Page 3: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Things like affordable 3D printing, job automation, and predictive maintenance technology are striking up a New Industrial Revolution that has industry veterans and novices alike taking notice.

Page 4: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

But despite all these recent advances, traditional manufacturing processes are still very effective. And choosing between the old and the new is merely a matter of considering the pros, cons, and purposes of each process.

Page 5: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Let’s take a look at how some of the most commonly used manufacturing processes compare:

Page 6: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Additive Manufacturing

Page 7: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Additive manufacturing is a process that involves assembling a product layer by layer.

Page 8: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare
Page 9: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Though many think of additive manufacturing as merely 3D printing, there are actually seven different processes that can be used to bring a complex design to life.

Page 10: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

These processes are: Vat Polymerisation, material jetting, binder jetting, material extrusion, powder bed fusion, sheet lamination, direct energy disposition.

Page 11: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

With the help of these processes, manufacturers are able to design and produce highly detailed and cost-effective products in a short amount of time.

Page 12: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

The reason for this is that additive manufacturing allows for the pre-fabrication of complex objects which helps reduce labor time and costs.

Page 13: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

However, because the additive process is so detailed, it can only produce single prototypes or small batches at a time.

Page 14: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Subtractive Manufacturing

Page 15: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

As you may have gathered from its name, Subtractive Manufacturing is the opposite from Additive Manufacturing. In this process, prototypes are created by removing material from larger pieces of material.

Page 16: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare
Page 17: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Subtractive is a more traditional manufacturing method that often involves milling, turning, lathing, drilling, and CNC.

Page 18: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

While most products can be made this way, subtractive processes are considered wasteful in comparison to other methods.

Page 19: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Subtractive processes are also limited to the amount of detail they can produce in a cost-effective way.

Page 20: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Oftentimes, detailed products require the use of a CNC router or skilled machinist, which can drive up costs significantly.

Page 21: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

On the plus side, subtractive manufacturing makes the most sense when producing large volume products that have simple part designs.

Page 22: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Formative Manufacturing

Page 23: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Formative manufacturing uses processes like injection molding, die casting, pressing, and stamping to form materials into the desired shape.

Page 24: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

This process can be completed using a variety of materials including metal and plastic. It also enables manufacturers to make a single product out of different materials at the same time.

Page 25: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Formative manufacturing, especially injection molding, also lends itself to creative and financial flexibility. In fact, many manufacturers can produce high quality parts of any color at very low per-part costs.

Page 26: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

But tooling can come at a hefty price, both in cost and in functionality. Tooling is not only expensive but also requires longer lead times, which is not ideal.

Page 27: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

There are also some constraints that need to be taken into consideration. For instance:

Page 28: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

And for die casting, the casting weight must be between 30 grams and 10kg, AND the final casting must have some porosity.

For injection molding, uneven wall thicknesses and sharp edges should be avoided in the design stage.

Page 29: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Each one of these manufacturing methods offers manufacturers something different, whether it’s quick turnaround time or the ability to mass produce.

All in all, it’s safe to say that all three of these methods still have a solid place in the manufacturing world.

Page 30: How Common Manufacturing Methods Compare

Pinterest Facebook Twitter

Want to learn more? Check us out on:

monarch.metal.com

Brought to you by Monarch Metal Fabrication