how criminal john e. steele retaliates

8/9/2019 How Criminal John E. Steele Retaliates

1/48

NOTICE OF APPEAL, RACKETEERING, JUDICIAL CRIMES, AND LAW SUIT

FRAUDULENT PRETENSES AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE & FILINGS

1. Defendant Corrupt U.S. Judge John Edwin Steele fraudulently pretended, Doc. # 434:This matter comes before the Court on review of defendants Motion for Entry ofOrder Directing Public Sale of Real Property (Doc. # 432) filed on May 21, 2010.No

response has been filedand the time to respond has expired. Upon review, the Courtdesires a response from plaintiff.Here over and over again, Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott hadfiled, e.g., multiple responses, court actions, appeals to directly attack, defendagainst, and expose Defendant Crooked U.S. Judge John E. Steeles publicly recorded:a. Racketeering;b. Extortion;c. Obstruction of justice;d. Deliberate deprivations;e. Acceptance ofbribes;f. Fraud upon the State and Federal Courts;

g. Destruction and alteration ofCourt records;h. Corruption.See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ex Rel. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.

DEF. STEELES RECKLESS DECEPTION AND FRAUD ON THE COURT

2. Def. Steele recklessly deceived the Court, because he disallowed the Plaintiffs to respondand then fraudulently pretended that the Plaintiffs had purportedly notresponded. Howeveras a matter of record, the Plaintiffs had published conclusive evidence of theirfiledresponses worldwide. Here, more than one Million readers had read the responses,which Def. Crook Steele had destroyed, altered, and rejected, and caused others todestroy, alter, and reject. See, e.g., Google and YouTube.

DEF. STEELE OBSTRUCTED PLAINTIFFS COURT ACCESS FRAUD ON COURT

3. As part of a criminal organization, Def. Steele fabricated and conspired to fabricate apublicly recorded card house of judicial shit:In this regard, some of the allegations in the Third Amended Complaint arecontradicted by the resolution which is attached to it. The copy of the Resolutionattached to the Third Amended Complaint establishes that it was signed, executed,and duly recorded in the public records, and plaintiff will not be allowed to assertotherwise. See Doc. # 338, p. 12.

Here, no authenticgenuine resolution was attached to the Third Amended Complaint,Doc. ## 288, 282. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 44, there was a lack of any publicly recordedresolution. No genuine resolution had ever legally existed; none had ever been legallyrecorded.Here by not allowing the Plaintiffs to assert otherwise, Def. Steele recklessly deprived thePlaintiffs of any opportunity of justice. Here, Def. Criminal Steele perpetrated fraud on theCourt, covered up, and concealedGovernment crimes.Just like other crime organizations, Steele relied on silencing his opponents, retaliation,intimidation, and injury.

4. In the Third Amended Complaint, the Plaintiff(s) had asserted and conclusively proven,e.g., the:a. Prima facieillegality of the fictitious resolution, O.R. 569/875;b. Prima facie nullity of the fake resolution;


2/48

2

c. Prima facie criminality of the falsified resolution.5. Only a court judgment could have possibly transferred title to Government and/orLee

County. Here on its face, the facially forged resolution wasa. Not any court judgment; b. Not anymuniment of title;c. Not anygenuine instrument:

d. Not any conveyance;e. Not authentic.RACKETEERING, EXTORTION, DECEPTION, AND FRAUD ON THE COURT

6. Therefore, any resolution forged orgenuine would have been, and could have onlybeen, entirely irrelevant, immaterial to any involuntary title transfer, because only a courtjudgmentcould have possibly divestedthe Plaintiffs of their private riparian street easementand street land on the Gulf, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), against their will.DEF. CROOK STEELE HAD NOAUTHORITYTO SILENCE THE PLAINTIFFS

7. Here in exchange forbribes, Def. Criminal Steele perverted supreme law and disallowedthe Plaintiffs to assert the truth and public record evidence without which any justice wasabsolutely impossible.

8. The Plaintiff(s) do not submit to said Criminal on the bench just like they would not submitto a Roman Catholic priest demanding to fuck the Plaintiff(s) in the ass. Here, the Plaintiffsdefended against organized Government crimes & sodomy and sued Defendant Racketeer J.E. Steele in Federal Court.

9. Here on the record, Def. Crook Steele adopted the policies and custom of crimeorganizations such as, e.g., silencing opponents, retaliation, intimidation, racketeering,extortion, and injury.

DEF. RACKETEER STEELES FACIALLY IDIOTIC & ILLEGAL order, DOC. # 434

10. No intelligent, rational, fit, and reasonable judge and/or person in Def. Crooked JudgeSteeles shoes could havepossiblyallowedthe fake writ of execution, Doc. # 425, and thefaciallyfraudulent public sale motion, Doc. # 432.

11. Any enforcement of a non-existent judgment against Dr. Busse by public sale of saidadjoining riparianstreet land and private implied street easement on the Gulf of Mexicowould have been absolutely impossible, if the record title had been in the name ofGovernment and/orLee County.

12. Publicly selling the very riparian street land and private Gulf-front street easement, PB3 PG 25 (1912), which Lee County had fraudulently claimed to own [but never did andcould notpossibly have ownedas a matter of law] further exposed and conclusively provedthe prima facie idiotic and criminal mind of Def. Racketeer John Edwin Steele.Emboldened by absolute power and public corruption, Def. Steele continued his recordGovernment shit flies-policy, Doc. # 434.

IDIDOCY & IMPOSSIBILITY OF public sale of real property13. One of the legal issues had been Plaintiff(s) unimpeachable record ownership of the

platted riparian street land and implied private street easement adjoining Plaintiffs upland onthe Gulf of Mexico, S-T-R-A-P 12-44-20-01-00015.015A (Lot 15A, Cayo Costa) as legallydescribed and perfectly conveyed to Plaintiff Dr. Busse and J. Franklin Prescott in referenceto the 1912 Plat of Survey of the private undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision in LeeCounty Plat Book 3, Page 25. See Plaintiffs WARRANTY DEED, Lee CountyINSTRUMENT # 2010000171344, which expressly stated the extent of Plaintiff(s)conveyance; see PRESCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11

th

Circuit Apr. 21, 2009).FOR BRIBES, DEF. STEELE MADE A MOCKERY OF THE PROCEEDINGS


3/48

3

14. Here as a matter of law, Public Sale of Real Property, which Def. Steele hadfraudulentlypretended to have been claimed by Lee County was absolutely impossible.Here, Def. Steele made a fool of himself, because that which had been claimed byGovernment could not be simultaneously publicly sold.

BRAZEN FABRICATIONS AND FALSIFICATION OF PUBLIC RECORD

15. Here in his fraudulent opinion and order, Doc. # 338, Steele brazenly fabricated and

falsified Government ownership without any evidentiary supportwhatsoever. Def. Steeleknew that those [fake] lots had never been owned by government, which had been thevery issue for the Courts review. Here, 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-20-01-00001.0000 were prima facie fake land parcels, which Defendants Steele and SheriPolster Chappell could notfindon the 1912 Cayo Costa Plat, PB 3 PG 25, because they hadbeen forged by Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson. See Transcript of November 2007Hearing before Def. Crooked Judge Polster Chappell.

DEF. CRIMINAL STEELE IN CRIMINAL JUDICIAL ORGANIZATION

16. As a Criminal in this Crime Organization of record, Def. Steele extended theracketeering and retaliationscheme.

Third Amended Complaint states that defendants have taken over 200 acres

pursuant to the Resolution, far in excess of his 2.5 acres. The only assertion ofdisparate treatment is forthose lots owned by government, which plaintiff allegesdid not have their rights taken. However, a private owner such as plaintiff can not becompared to a public owner such as a government unit. Therefore, no equalprotection claim is stated, and such claims will be dismissed without prejudice. SeeDoc. # 338, p. 13.

17. Here in essence, the scheme was:Plaintiffs will not be allowed to assert those [fake] lots owned by Government,which nobody can find on the Cayo Costa Plat. Plaintiffs will not be allowed to assertthe public record evidence of the non-existence and forgery of said fake lots.Therefore, the case is dismissed and fixed in exchange forbribes.

18. By criminal means offake land parcels, and a fake resolution, Defendant Governmentsand Officials extorted, defrauded, deprived, and treated the Plaintiffs disparately, whilethe Plaintiffs were never even allowed to assert the conclusive record evidence and truth.Here, there was fraud on the Court, and any and all of Def. Steeles orders were null andvoid ab initio.

19. Pleading, e.g., fraud, conspiracy to defraud, deprivations, conspiracy to deprive, forgeryof land parcels, and extortion were remediesavailable in Florida and Federal Courts. SeeDoc. ## 288, 282, Third Amended Complaint.

20. Just like a bungling Government idiot, Defendant Steele concealed and conspired withother Officials to conceal that, e.g.:a. Plaintiff(s) perfect record title to their adjoining street land never transferredto Lee

County, FL; b. Plaintiff(s)unimpeachable record title could not have possibly transferredunder any

existing law or modification thereof, Fed.R.Civ.P. 11;c. Lee Countys sham claims were facially fraudulent and frivolous claims for

criminal and illegal purposes of racketeering, retaliation, extortion of money($5,048.60) and land, and illegal sale of real property, Doc. # 434;

d. Lee County never claimed and could not havepossiblyclaimedPlaintiff(s) street landunder any law;

e. The law did not recognize Lee Countys racketeering & extortion scheme O.R.569/875.


4/48

4

See Chapters 73, 74 ( Eminent Domain); 95 ( Adverse Possession); 712 ( Floridas self-enforcing Marketable Record Title Act), Fla. Stat.; Floridas express Const. Guarantees offundamental rights to own real property and exclude Government without, e.g.,retaliation, extortion, racketeering, oppression, bribery, and public corruption.

21. Because Def. Steele is part of a criminal organization, Def. Steele retaliated and silencedthe Plaintiff(s) in said idiotic, arbitrary, capricious, and malicious manner of public record. In

particular, Steele shut up the Plaintiffs by calling them names such as, e.g., vexatious.22. Only ifPlaintiffs unimpeachable record title to said riparian street land and private riparianstreet easement had nevertransferred from the Plaintiffs toLee County and/orGovernment,could therepossibly be any public sale of said private riparian street easement and landon the Gulf of Mexico. See PRESCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 343 Fed. Appx. 395,396-97 (11

thCircuit Apr. 21, 2009). Here forbribes, and under color ofauthority,sanctions

and punishment, Def. Steele retaliated and called the Plaintiffs names such as, e.g.,vexatious.

23. Because pursuant to their publicly recorded Warranty Deed, the Plaintiff(s) were theexclusive record owners and title holders of said street land and private street easement onthe Gulf of Mexico, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), Lee Countys faciallycriminal and illegal claims

of a regulation, resolution, O.R. 569/875, fake land parcels, et al. had been a primafacie extortion and racketeering scheme. See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ex Rel. etal. v. UNITED STATES et al.

DEF. JOHN E. STEELES FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT AND COVER-UP

24. Under publicly recorded fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., frivolity, vexatiousness,sanctionability, lack of jurisdiction, ripeness requirements, et al., Def. Steele coveredup and fraudulently concealed the recorded Government pattern and policy of, e.g.:a. Racketeering;b. Extorting under color of a fake July 29, 2009 judgment;c. Extorting under color of a non-existent $5,048.60 judgment;d. Extorting & defrauding under color of fake land parcels which could not befound;e. Extorting & defrauding under color of prima facie scam O.R. 569/875;f. Perverting a final $24.30 money judgment & mandate into a fake writ of

execution, Doc. # 425.DEF. STEELE CONCEALED DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL AND ILLEGAL MOTION,

DOC. # 432

25. Def. Steele fraudulently concealed the prima facie criminality and illegality of Doc. #432: Here, no genuine $5,048.60 and/or $5,000.00 money mandate had ever existed,because, e.g.:a. The 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction on 06/11/2009; b. Theonly and finalmandate was in the amount of $24.30, Doc. # 365;c. Def. Appellee Wilkinson had neverfiledanyRule 38 motion;d. The $24.30 money judgment pursuant to Rule 39, Fed.R.App.P., had become final on

June 15, 2009, Doc. # 365;e. No Bill of Costs for $5,000.00 and/or $5,048.60 had ever existed or could have

possibly existed. See FED.R.CIV.P. 54; 28 U.S.C. 1921-1928; FRAP 39: LOCAL RULE4.18:LOCAL RULE 4.18 APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS OR ATTORNEY'S FEES

(a) In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, all claims for costs or attorney's feespreserved by appropriate pleading or pretrial stipulation shall be asserted by separatemotion or petition filed not later than fourteen (14) days following the entry of


5/48

5

judgment. The pendency of an appeal from the judgment shall not postpone the filingof a timely application pursuant to this rule.

STEELE FABRICATED A writ of execution, DOC. # 42526. In the recorded presence of a final $24.30 money judgment issued as mandate on

06/11/2009 for costs of Appellees copies, Doc. # 365, and in the record absence of any

$5,048.60 judgment, Def. Steele knew and fraudulently concealed that the fake writ ofexecution, Doc. # 425, had been falsified and was null and void. On its very face, no U.S.judge and no witness had appeared on the falsified writ, Doc. # 425.

CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP AND CONCEAL GOVERNMENT CRIMES

27. Def. Steele conspired with other Government Officials and Defendants to cover up andfraudulently conceal the prima facie criminality, illegality, and nullity of, e.g.:a. Fake$5,048.60 judgment;b. Fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;c. Fake land claim O.R. 569/875;d. Fake resolution, fake resolution 569/875;e. Fake regulation, fake land use regulation;

f. Fake regulatory taking in the recorded absence of any regulation;g. Fake inverse condemnation while Plaintiffs objected to and defended against anyinvoluntarytitle transferto Lee County;

h. Fake eminent domain claims in the record absence of any condemnation proceedings.28. Here, Government and judicial racketeering, extortion, obstruction of justice & court

access, bribery, public corruption, fraud, and deliberate deprivations did not, and couldnotpossibly, involuntarily divestthe Plaintiff(s) of their record title to riparian Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A on the Gulf of Mexico.

55.10 REQUIRED AJUDGMENT- NOLIEN ON PROPERTY29. Under Florida law, a non-existentjudgment did not become, and could not have possibly

become a lien on real property. Here, section 55.10 could not have possibly applied to anon-existent mandate. Here, the finalmandate of$24.30 for copies, Doc. # 365, hadbeen paid. See Affidavits on file. Furthermore here, Defendant Steele fraudulentlyconcealed that

A judgment, order, or decree does not become a lien on real property unless theaddress of the person who has a lien as a result of such judgment, order, or decree iscontained in the judgment, order, or decree See Ch. 55, Florida Statutes.

Here, judicial Defendants knew and fraudulently concealed that there could not havepossibly been any lienon real property and/or on Plaintiffs property.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, BRIBERY, AND RACKETEERING

30. In exchange forbribes, Defendant Racketeer John E. Steele silencedthe Plaintiffs and keptthem away from the Court:a. Disallowed the Plaintiffs to assert the truth and conclusive public record evidence;b. Removed Plaintiffs State action to Federal Court;c. Removed and destroyed Plaintiffs State Court records;d. Unlawfully sanctioned and punished the Plaintiffs;e. Arbitrarily & capriciouslydenied the Plaintiffs equal electronic court access;f. Illegally enjoined the Plaintiffs from filing their pleadings;g. Rejected Plaintiffs pleadings;h. Caused the Def. Clerk to alter and destroy Court records and crime evidence;i. Retaliated against the Plaintiffs;j. Caused the Def. U.S. Marshal to threaten, intimidate, and harass the Plaintiffs.


6/48

6

CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE & PERPETRATE FRAUD ON THE COURTS

31. Defendant John Edwin Steele conspired with, e.g., Defendant Crooked U.S. Judge CharleneE. Honeywell and other Officials to shut up the Plaintiffs by criminal and illegal means of,e.g.:a. Enjoining Plaintiffs from filing their pleadings [Pre-filing injunction];b. Destroying Plaintiffs pleadings

c. Rejecting Plaintiffs pleadings;d. Falsifying a regulation;e. Fabricating law;f. Concocting a fictitious involuntary title transfer to Lee County absent any court

judgment.FINAL 06/11/2009 MANDATE

32. The 11th Circuit decided Case 2008-13170-BB by opinion entered on 03/05/2009. On06/11/2009, the Defendant Clerk of said Appellate Court filed the mandate, which consistedof a copy of the opinion and ajudgment that had been drafted and signed by a Clerk of saidCourt, and directions as to costs in the amount of$24.30. See Fed.R.App.P. 41.

33. The Clerk of the Court signed her name on a copy of the judgment, which was stamped

"ISSUED AS MANDATE 06/11/2009" and CLOSED SAID CASEon 06/11/2009.


7/48

Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 288 Filed 01/11/08 Page 1 of 11


8/48



9/48



10/48



11/48



12/48



13/48



14/48



15/48



16/48



17/48



18/48

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUEADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEAL & JUDICIAL CRIMES

____________________________________________________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM order, DOC. # 48, 7/14/10

NOTICE OF RECORD THREATS, EXTORTION, AND CRIMES

BY DEFENDANT JUDICIAL WHORE CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL

NOTICE OF FAKE lien, FAKE 07/29/2009 judgment, CH. 55, FLA. STAT.,

FACIALLY FORGED judgment, AND FAKE writ of execution, DOC. ## 386-5, 425

PUBLISHED RECORD CONCLUSIVE PUBLIC CORRUPTION & PERJURY PROOF

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM FRAUDULENT ORDER, DOC. # 48 FILED 07/14/10

1. Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed record absence of writ

of execution, record fake land parcels such as, e.g., 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0, and

facially forged resolution 569/875 [see Doc. ## 288, 282; Case No. 2:07-cv-00228, Lee

County PB 3 PG 25 (1912)]:


19/48

2

In the motion, Plaintiffs appear to seek a release of the writ of execution andattachment of a lien to property issued in Busse v. Lee County, Florida, et al., CaseNo. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-29SPC. That case was before [Defendant] Judge John Steeleand [Defendant] Magistrate Judge Sheri Chappell. See Doc. # 48.

2. Here in exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Honeywell concealed and agreed to

conceal the stringent requirements of 55.10, Florida Statutes, and non-existence of any

lien. Here in particular, Def. Honeywell knew that admittedly Defendant K. M. Wilkinson

had never even fileda Rule 38 motion, Fed.R.App.P. 38, and that Appellate Case No.08-

13170-BB had been CLOSED on 06/11/2009. Here, Honeywells facially fraudulent

order, Doc. # 48, further proved Defendant Honeywells prima facie pattern and policy of

corruption, extortion, bribery, and case fixing outside any officialcapacity.

DEF. HONEYWELLS FALSE PRETENSES AND FABRICATION OF LIEN

3. Here in particular, Honeywell knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal with other Judges

and Defendants that a facially non-existent judgment could NOT havepossibly become a

lien on real property. See 55.10, Fla. Stat.

4. Here Def. Honeywell knew that fake resolution 569/875 and Def. Wilkinsons forged

land parcels had never existed, and that no valid writ of execution was ever executed

and/or witnessed by any identifiable judge. Here, no judgment existed on the Docket,

Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. See Document 425 Filed 02/02/10; see Doc. ## 288, 282.

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO EXTORT

5. Here, Defendant extortionist Honeywell conspired with other Judges, Officials, and

Defendants to extort Plaintiff corruption victims and whistleblowers property and fees

under color of, e.g., a facially forged resolution 569/875, fake land parcels, a non-

existent 07/29/09 judgment and a fake writ of execution. See Doc. ## 425, 288, 282, 386,

365, 432; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.


20/48

3

EMERGENCY OF CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL RECORD PERJURY

6. Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and agreed to

conceal that Defendant JACK N. PETERSON had perjured himself, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228:

KENNETH M. WILKINSON, as Property Appraiser of Lee County, Florida, is theholder of a judgment issued by the United States of Appeals in and for the EleventhCircuit on July 29, 2009 in Docket 08-13170-BB against Appellant JORG BUSSE inthe amount of $5,048.60.

Here, said Defendant Crooked Government Officials Honeywell, Wilkinson, and

Peterson conspired with other Defendants, Judges, and Officials to fraudulently conceal

the non-existent July 29, 2009 judgment and the non-existent lien. See Ch. 55,

Florida Statutes.

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CLOSURE OF CASE # 08-13170-BB ON 06/11/2009

7. Here, said Defendants conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently conceal that CASE

NO. 2008-13170-BB had been CLOSED on June 11, 2009. See Appellate Docket on file.

11th Circuit Record and Exhibits had been RETURNED to this Court on 06/11/2009.

RECORD JUN 11 2009 BILL OF COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $24.30

8. The facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009 and received by the U.S.

District Court 2009 JUN 15 AM 11:20, Doc. # 365, was in the amount of$24.30, Doc. #

386, 386-3, 365; BILL OF COSTS issued on JUN 11 2009; 11th

CIRCUIT FORM MISC-

12 (12/07).

9. Here, Defendant Wilkinson had neverclaimedmore than $24.30, and therefore under the

Rules, was never entitled to more than $24.30. See attached Fed. R. App. P. Here as a

matter of record, Defendant Wilkinson and/or his Attorney had sworn and/or affirmed

that the costs claimed were $24.30. See Doc. # 386-3; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.


21/48

4

$24.30 WAS FINAL AMOUNT [FRAUDULENTLY ALLOWED]

10. The Eleventh Circuit has held that the action becomes final on the date the district court

receives the appellate court's mandate. See U.S. v. Lasteed, 832 F.2d 1240-43 (11th

Cir.

1987).

HONEYWELL CONCEALED DEFENDANTS CONCOCTION OF FAKE $5,048.60

11. Here, Defendant Crooked Honeywell concealed and agreed to conceal that Defendants

Peterson and Wilkinson had concocted an amount of $5,048.60. Plaintiff Government

corruption and crime victims sued Defendants KENNETH M. WILKINSON, JACK N.

PETERSON, and CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL in theirprivate individual capacities.

RECORD EXTORTION, PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD

12. Under color of non-existent authority, Lee County, Florida, Defendants and Officials

fabricated and conspired to fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and

07-44-21-01-00001.0000. See Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912).

CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP & CONCEAL RECORD GOVERNMENT CRIMES

13. In these State and Federal Cases since 2006, Defendant U.S. Judges idiotically conspired

with other Officials to conceal the prima facie record forgeries of said non-existent land

parcels. See, e.g., record Transcript of corrupted proceedings before Defendant judicial

whore Sheri Polster Chappell in November 2007 on file; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

DEF. CROOK HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL 2006 STATE ACTION

14. Even though the State Court Judge himself was a Co-Defendant in this U.S. Court,

Defendant Corrupt Judges John E. Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell fraudulently concealed

Plaintiffs State Court action after said judicial Defendants themselves had removed


22/48

5

Plaintiffs legal action from State to Federal Court. See Case No. 2:2008-cv-00899 (BUSSE

v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Lee County Circuit Court; Def. Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.).

FACIALLY FRAUDULENT 03/05/09 judgment and 06/11/09 mandate

15. In its facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009, said 11th Circuit

fraudulently pretended and fabricated on the record, Doc. ## 365; 386:

III. Since Busses takings claim was not ripe because he had notpursued available stateremedies and he failed to adequately plead his other federal claims Id.

Here as a matter of fact and record, Busse and Prescott had pursued available state

remedies in Lee County Circuit Court [removed to this Court: 2:2008-cv-00899],

adequately pleadedall their prima facie ripe federal claims, and demanded relief from said

facially fraudulent and corrupt Government determinations.

EMERGENCY OF DEFENDANTS CONCEALMENT OF REMOVED STATE ACTION

16. Here, Judges concealed and conspired to conceal Busses pursuit in State Courtand

Defendant Crooked Judge Steeles and Chappells removal from State to Federal Court. See

2006-CA-003185; Def. Judge Gerald, Lynn, Jr.; 2:2008-cv-00899 [removed].

EMERGENCY OF RECORD BRIBERY AND CASE FIXING

17. Here insanely, and in exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Judicial Crooks Steele and

Chappell fraudulently and criminally pretended that Plaintiffs rights to own their real

property and exclude Government from their riparian Gulf-front street and up lands,

S.T.R.A.P # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), were purportedly not

fundamental rights. See brazen bribery and public corruption on the record!

DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO FABRICATE RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS

18. Furthermore here, Defendant judicial whore Honeywell knew and concealed that in

exchange for bribes, Defendants Steele and Chappell had conspired with other Defendants to


23/48

6

fabricate ripeness requirements under color of fake resolution 569/875. See Doc. # 338;

Fixed Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. See Doc. ## 213; 236; Fixed Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.

PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS SUED UNREPRESENTED DEF. HONEYWELL

19. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record landowners and public corruption victims sued

Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell in herprivate individual capacity, because her

purported orders were outside any immunity and scope ofofficialacts. See Docket 2:2010-

cv-00390.

20. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell had admitted to having been served and

disqualified herself. See Doc. # 3; 06/22/2010; Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390.

21. Idiotically, the Court then reassigned the Case to Co-Defendant Crooked Judge John Edwin

Steele. See Doc. # 4, 06/22/2010.

22. Here, no notice of appearance was filed on behalf of said Defendant Corrupt Judge

Honeywell. See Docket, Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390; 07/14/2009, 19:43:47.

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AGREED TO CONCEAL FORGED LAND PARCELS

23. Judges, Defendants, and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that said facially forged

parcels had neverexistednor been legally described, conveyed, andplatted. See 1912 Plat

of Survey of private undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County PB 3 PG 25.

FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF 07/292009 judgment

24. Defendant crooked Officials Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack N. Peterson fraudulently

pretended:

11. A certified copy of the [07/29/09] judgment has been recorded in the PublicRecords of Lee County, Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 and serves as alien against the property. See Doc. # 386, p. 3, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

Here, the non-existentjudgmentdid notserveasany lien. See Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.


24/48

7

25. Here, the Clerk of this U.S. District Court and custodian of said Courts records could not

authenticate the fraudulently pretended 07/29/2009 judgment, because said Clerk never

received any 07/29/2009 judgment. Here, the Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, was

devoid of any 07/29/09 judgment. See authenticated Docket on file.

26. Here, Def. U.S. Judges, Government Officials, and the other Defendants knew and agreed to

conceal that this Court had no power whatsoever to enforce a non-existentjudgment.

DEF. WILKINSON FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2

27. Defendant Crooked Official Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged, e.g., land parcels, and

maps. Here, Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court and facially forged a

judgment. See Doc. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2. The smaller font size of the page number 2 did

not match font size 14 of the text. The facially forged judgment was not, and could not

possibly have been, a true copy. See Exhibit below. The facially forged and pasted

judgment copy did not comply with 55.10, Fla. Stat. E.g., said fake did not contain any

address.

28. In Doc. # 432, p. 3 of 7, Defendant Wilkinson had asserted:

On February 2, 2010, the Clerk of this Court issued a Writ of Execution (D.E. 425).

29. Here, said Clerk knew that no such judgment had ever been receivedfrom the Circuit Clerk

and that no 07/29/2010 judgment appeared on the Docket, Case # 2:2007-cv-00228.

HONEYWELL CONCEALED THAT FAKE WRIT WAS VOID & NEVER WITNESSED

30. Here, Doc. # 425 Filed 02/02/10 materially misrepresented in the record absence of any

identifiable judge:

you cause to be made and levied as well a certain debt of:$Five thousand Forty-Eight AND Sixty Cents


25/48

8

in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, before the Judgeof the said Court by the consideration of the same Judge lately recovered against thesaid, Jorg Busse Witness the Honorable [United States Judge] ____ [blank]

Here on its face, the fraudulent writ of execution did not identify any judge and was

null and void. In particular, Witness the Honorable ___ was blank. See Doc. # 425.

DEF. WILKINSON EXTORTED MONEY AND PROPERTY

31. Defendant Wilkinson extorted fees and property by fraudulently pretending:

4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to EleventhCircuit Rule 27-4, requesting an order awarding attorneys fees in the amount of $5,000,double costs and such other relief as the Court deemed appropriate for defendantAppellants frivolous appeal. See Doc. # 432, p. 2.

Here, Def. Wilkinson again deceived the Court, because Jorg Busse had been the Plaintiff

[and not the defendant] and Wilkinson had admittedly neverfiledany Rule 38 motion.

32. Fed.R.App.P. 27-4 states:

Repy to Response. Any reply to a response must be filed within 7 days after serviceof the response. A reply must not present matters that do not relate to the response.

Here, Def. Wilkinsons pleading(s) and brief had been without legal meritand could not be

supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing

law, or the establishment of new law. In addition, Def. Wilkinsons pleadings contained

assertions of material facts that were patently clearly false and unsupported by the record,

O.R. 569/875 In particular, prima facie sham claim O.R. 569/875 was not any

regulation, legislative act, resolution, or law and as a matter of law, could not have

possibly divestedthe Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs expressly stated will. Here,

the Plaintiffs had defended their unimpeachable record title against any condemnation and

refused to exchange their perfected title just because corrupt Government Officials, e.g.,

threatened, harassed, defrauded, and deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their


26/48

9

fundamental rights to own property, exclude Government(s), redress their grievances of no

due process and no equal protection, and have ajury trial.

33. Here, no accounting whatsoever, and none was ever provided as required, could have

possiblyexplained and/orjustifiedthe fraudulent amount of $5,048.60 under the Rules.

Here, presentingor opposing Plaintiff(s) conclusive record evidence of Def. Wilkinsons

fraud, extortion, corruption on the record did not, and could not, possibly have incurred

5,048.60 according to the Rule.

WILKINSON FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED REGULATORY TAKING

IN THE PRIMA FACIE RECORD ABSENCE OF ANYREGULATION:

HOW FRIVOLOUS WAS THAT?

34. Therefore here, Defendant Wilkinsons assertion of a regulatory taking was on its face

frivolous, deceptive, and fraudulent. Furthermore, Defendant Wilkinson presented his

pleadings and brief for the improper and illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting fees and property

from the Plaintiff public corruption victims, coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further

prosecution, fraudulently concealing forged land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0

and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000, extending and conspiring to extend extortion and fraud

scheme O.R. 569/875, obstructing justice and just speedy adjudication of Plaintiffs

claims for relief, harassing the Plaintiffs, and causing unnecessary delay and needless

increase in the cost of litigation since 2006 in State and Federal Courts over one single piece

of trash paper: facially null and void O.R. 569/875.

35. Therefore here admittedly, Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany Rule 38 motion, never

allegeda frivolous appeal, and neverdemanded any Rule 38 relief.


27/48

10

UPDATED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS

36. Plaintiff public corruption victims filed another updated Criminal Complaint in this matter

with State and Federal law enforcement.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand

1. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywells record

EXTORTION and CORRUPTION under color ofauthority and prima facie scam O.R.

569/875, said fake lien, fake 07/29/09 judgment, and fake writ of execution, 55.10,

Ch. 55, 56, Fla. Stat.

2. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record judicial EXTORTION and

CORRUPTION under color of non-existent O.R. 569/875, resolution 569/875, and

fraudulent regulatory taking pretenses, because as a matter of law, no law or

resolution, whatsoever, could have possibly alienatedPlaintiffs record property against

their will;

3. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record EXTORTION and CORRUPTION and

embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a lien and public land claim

[see, e.g., Doc. ## 213; 214; 212, Case No. 2:09-cv-00791; and Case No. 2:07-cv-00228,

Doc. ## 288, 282, 425, 386, 365].

4. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining Def. objectively partial/crooked Judge Honeywell, and

Defendants Jack N. Peterson, and Kenneth M. Wilkinson from perverting the record &

concealing Plaintiffs record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912);

5. An EMERGENCY orderrelieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and

proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 48, 49; and Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214, Case


28/48

11

No. 2:09-cv-00791 at the dirty hands of Def. judicial whore Honeywell for said well-proven

reasons;

6. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their

State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;

7. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not fabricate a lien and did not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs record ownership of said

Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as evidenced in Plaintiffs Complaint and

pleadings;


not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as affirmed by the public record;


not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record ownership by the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the 11th

Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.

Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);


not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11 th

Circuit U.S. Appellate Court, Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY;

11. An Ordercompelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her rulings were not

NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false frivolity and

vexatiousness pretenses and the concealment of said fake legal descriptions, fake land

parcels, and fake Government ownership claims and contentions;


29/48

12

12. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she

disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the

facts of record, and could notpossibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. 455; 28

U.S.C. 144.

/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro seP.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295____________________________________/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.

Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro seState Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;[email protected]


30/48


31/48

14


32/48

15

Def. Crooked Honeywells Real Estate Fraud:

Fake lot and block numbers such as, e.g.:

o 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;o 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;

Neither fake lot 00A0 nor block

00001ever existed.

Fake Government ownership claims;

Fake transaction(s) such as, e.g., O.R.

569/875; Fake resolution and law claims;

Fake land parcels;

Fake frivolity defenses;

Fake vexatiousness contentions;

Fake legal descriptions:


33/48

16


34/48

17


35/48

18


36/48

19


37/48

20


38/48

21


39/48

22


40/48

23


41/48

24


42/48

25


43/48

26


44/48

27


45/48

28


46/48

29


47/48

30


48/48

how criminal john e. steele retaliates

Documents