how to instill quality culture in higher education? a ... · how to instill quality culture in...
TRANSCRIPT
www.ukm.mywww.ukm.my
How to Instill Quality Culture in Higher Education?
A Malaysian Case
Prof. Shahrir Abdullah, PhD, PEng
Dean, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, UKMand, President of MyQAN (myqan.org)
APQN Conference, Bali27-29 August 2018
www.ukm.my
Background…
• In absence of quality framework in higher education, in 1990s, the government recommended adaptation of ISO 9000 for the agencies’ QMS:
• Many public universities adopted similar approach.
• In late 1990 until mid 2000, many professional bodies enforced requirement on programme accreditation for degree recognition and graduate/professional registration:
• In early 2000, Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) and Malaysian Medical Council (MMC) started move towards OBE and student-centred learning.
• In 2006 onwards, Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) was introduced and OBE was implemented, followed by the MQA Act 2007:
• In 2009-2010, MQA started institutional audit for all universities with 9 universities awarded for the self-accreditation award.
• In 2015-2016, 10 more invited to apply self-accreditation status, which is viewed as a recognition to a good IQA system.
• In 2017, MQF was reviewed and aligned to AQRF (ASEAN Qualifications Referenced Framework.
2
www.ukm.my
Provisions and Policies
• Acts of Parliaments – Laws of Malaysia
• Act 550 – Education Act 1996
• Act 30 – Universities and University Colleges Act 1971
• Act 555 – Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996
• Act 679 – Malaysian Qualifications Agency Act 2007
• Professional Bodies:
• Act 50 – Medical Act 1971;
• Act 51 – Dental Act 1971;
• Act 138 – Registration of Engineers Act 1967 (Rev. 2007); etc.
• Policies and National Blueprints
• Policies, standards and guidelines issued by MOHE and MQA
• National Strategic Blueprints, e.g., National Education Blueprint – Higher Education (2015-2025)
3
www.ukm.my
Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia
• Statistics (data as of 31st May 2018):• Public universities = 20;• Private HEIs = 457:
• Universities (excluding campuses) = 47;• College Universities (excluding campuses) =34;• Branch Campuses of Overseas Universities = 10;• Colleges = 366.
• Type of HEIs:• With specific autonomy
• e.g., self-accreditation and specific autonomy rights;
• Research vs. teaching;• Technical, Focused and comprehensive.
www.ukm.my
HARMONISATION OF QA ECOSYSTEM BASED ON MQF
5
www.ukm.my
Stages of MQF Implementation
2003
• MQF was being drafted and concepts of learning outcomes, student learning hours, credit system and educational pathways are being formulated.
• Engineering and medical professional bodies/programmes started to embrace OBE.
2007
• Curricula were reviewed to adopt criteria in MQF, MQA’s qualification standards, programme standards and codes of practice (COPPA & COPIA.
• Verified through MQA’s Academic Performance Audits (APA) in 2009-2010
2011
• Full implementation and conformity to MQF in curriculum design and delivery were verified through APA/accreditation provess, including by professional bodies.
• 9 universities were granted self-accreditation status.
2017
• MQR 2nd Ed. was approved and aligned to ASEAN Qualifications Referenced Framework (AQRF). Subsequently, COPPA and other instruments were reviewed.
• 9 more universities were granted self-accreditation status. (Total = 18).
6
www.ukm.my
Harmonisation through MQF
• MQF has standardised and harmonised key requirements in curriculum design and delivery:• Credit system: 1 credit = 40 notional/learning hours;• Qualification levels: 8 levels from certificates to doctoral with
specified minimum credit;• Learning outcomes: 8 domains of LOs in MQF 1st ed. and 5
clusters of LOs in MQF 2nd ed. that are aligned with AQRF;• Various educational pathways (including APEL);• Programme naming convention ➔ policies set by MOE.
• Programme management and accreditation is guided by more specific and discipline based criteria• in form of codes of practice (COPIA/COPPA) and programme
standards issued by MQA or professional bodies (➔MRAs).
7
www.ukm.my
Harmonisation through MQF
• Establishment of Malaysian Qualifications Register (MQR):• Online database of accredited programmes for recognition.
• Facilitating student mobility and promoting cross-border collaboration and exchange programmes, through:• Compatible credit system and flexible credit transfer policy;• Accredited programmes based on OBE curriculum.
• Institutional self-regulation via self-accreditation status:• Promoting academic autonomy and internal ownership with
internal standards, guided by external criteria and benchmark;• Advancement from quality control to quality assurance and
quality enhancement;• Closing the loop of OBE with focus on LO attainment.
8
www.ukm.my
Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) 2nd Ed. (2017)
LevelMinimum
Credit
Sector
Academic TVET APEL (A) Criteria
8 -/80 PhD/Doctoral degree -35 years old with Bachelor
and 5 years work experience
7-/403020
Master’s degreePostgraduate Diploma
Postgraduate Certificate-
30 years old with STPM/Diploma/equivalent
and relevant work experience
61206636
Bachelor’s DegreeGraduate Diploma
Graduate Certificate-
21 years old with relevant work experience
5 40 Advanced Diploma 5
4 90 Diploma 420 years old with
relevant work experience
3 60 Certificate 319 years old with
relevant work experience
2 30 Certificate 2 3R
1 15 Certificate 1 3R
www.ukm.my
Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) 2nd Ed. (2017)
• Clusters of Learning Outcomes*:1. Knowledge and understanding;2. Cognitive skills;3. Functional work skills with focus on:
a. Practical skills;b. Interpersonal skills;c. Communication skills;d. Digital skills;e. Numeracy skills;f. Leadership, autonomy and
responsibility.
4. Personal and entrepreneurial skills;5. Ethics and professionalism.
*aligned to ASEAN Qualifications Reference Framework
(AQRF):• 4 types of abilities:
• Cognitive competence• Functional competence• Personal competence• Ethical competence
• 2 domains of level descriptors:• Knowledge and skills• Application and
Responsibility
www.ukm.my
QA Requirements and Standards
• Malaysian Qualifications Framework (approved by the National Higher Education Council)MQF
• National Policies and Strategic Plans on Higher Education
Ministry of Education
• Code of Practice for Institutional Audit (COPIA)
• Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation (COPPA)
• Qualification Standards (PG, Foundations,etc.)
Codes of Practice and Standards → MQA
• Non-professional Programmes (MQA)
• Professional Programmes (Professional Bodies)
• Guidelines to Good Practices (MQA)
Programme Standards and Guidelines
• Approved by Senate and Governing Boards
Institutional Policies and Regulations
11
www.ukm.my
MQA’s Accreditation Model
www.ukm.my
STRENGTHENINGIQA UNITS & FUNCTIONS
13
www.ukm.my
Quality Assurance Ecosystem:IQA-EQA Interaction
IQA + EQA = QA System
MQR
QUALITY ASSURANCE
SYSTEM ACCREDITATION
External Quality Assurance:• Benchmarking• Third-party audit• Evaluation
Internal Quality Assurance:• Monitoring• Self-review/assessment• Improvement
www.ukm.mywww.ukm.my
An Example of IQA Structure
Pro
cesses a
t Dep
artm
en
t
Departmental IQA Unit or Person in Charge
Departmental Committee or
Person for QA/QMS Implementation
• Monitors QMS implementation and CQI action plans;
• Prepares QA report or programme self-review report.
Other Departmental Committees (which can be formed,
if necessary).
Departmental Committee or
Person for Internal Audit
• Conducts internal audit to verify QA report and achievement of department’s KPIs;
• Evaluates improvement plans for effectiveness.
Institutional Management
Institutional IQA Unit
Section concerned with QA Documentation and QMS
• Develops QA documentation and QMS manuals;
• Coordinates implementation of QMS and data analysis for quality indicators;
• Coordinates and monitors action plans for CQI;
• Prepares institutional self-review portfolio.
Section concerned with Internal Audits
• Audits QMS and the related core processes according to the specified QMS/QA standards (e.g. MS ISO 9001:2008, COPPA and COPIA) and strategic plans.
15
www.ukm.my
IQA@UKM: Phases of Development
Before 2005
• Pre-MQF/OBE
2005-2009
• MQF launched
• MQA established
• OBE/SCL adopted
2010-2015
• Self-accreditation awarded
• Autonomy status awarded
After 2015
• Self-accreditation renewed
16
www.ukm.my
Setting Up an IQA :Key Success Factors
•Strong support from the university leadership, top management and Senate
Institutional Support
•Shared ownership with process owners
•Clear roles/responsibility with process managers/administrators
Shared Governance
•Competence of QA officers
•Prominence of the QA office/council
Capacity Building
•Enculturation of self-assessment/self-reflection
•Sustaining CQI and quality enhancement all levels
Quality Culture
•Periodical and cyclic of programme monitoring and evaluation
•Reviews of strategic quality indicators and overall performance
QA/QMS Processes
•Continuous engagement with regulators, EQA, professional bodies (signatories of MRAs) and stakeholders
External Engagement
www.ukm.my
BUILDING IQA SYSTEM:ISSUES and CHALLENGES
18
www.ukm.my
Issues and Challenges
• Resource Requirement for IQA Offices and Governance:• From a small unit within another office (e.g., T&L or strategic
planning office) to an independent IQA office with autonomous and prominent status;
• From internal audits on document adequacy to rigorous audits and reviews on programmes with periodical CQI cycles.
• Competency of IQA Officers:• Officers with academic background and experiences in programme
management vs. non-academic administrators.;• In keeping up with dynamism of QA requirement
• Cross-border collaboration for initiating and managing exchanged programmes:• Programmes need to be recognised and accredited by both countries.
19
www.ukm.my
Thank You
Prof. Ir. Dr. Shahrir Abdullah ([email protected])
Dean, Faculty of Engineering & Built EnvironmentUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
and, President of MyQAN (www.myqan.org)