hrm10echap11

Upload: dheeraaj-geadam

Post on 10-Apr-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    1/38

    Human ResourceHuman Resource

    ManagementManagementTENTH EDITONTENTH EDITON

    2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentationby Charlie CookPowerPoint Presentationby Charlie Cook

    Performance ManagementPerformance Management

    and Appraisaland Appraisal

    Chapter 11Chapter 11

    SECTION 3Training and

    DevelopingHuman

    Resources

    SECTION 3Training and

    DevelopingHuman

    Resources

    Robert L. MathisRobert L. Mathis John H. JacksonJohn H. Jackson

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    2/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 112

    Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

    After you have read this chapter, you should beable to:

    Distinguish between job criteria and performancestandards and discuss criterion contamination and

    deficiency.

    Identify two major uses of performance appraisal.

    Provide examples of several rater errors.

    Describe both the advantages and disadvantages ofmultisource (360) appraisal.

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    3/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 113

    Learning Objectives (contd)Learning Objectives (contd)

    Identify the nature of behavioral approaches toperformance appraisal and management byobjectives (MBO).

    Discuss several concerns about appraisal feedback

    interviews. Identify the characteristics of a legal and effective

    performance appraisal system.

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    4/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 114

    Identifying and MeasuringIdentifying and Measuring

    Employee PerformanceEmployee Performance

    Performance Management System

    Processes used to identify, encourage, measure,evaluate, improve, and reward employee

    performance. Performance

    What an employee does and does not do. Quantity of output Quality of output

    Timeliness of output Presence at work

    Cooperativeness

    Job Criteria

    Important elements in a given job

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    5/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 115

    LinkageLinkage

    BetweenBetween

    Strategy,Strategy,Outcomes,Outcomes,

    andand

    OrganizationalOrganizational

    ResultsResults

    Figure 111

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    6/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 116

    Types of Performance InformationTypes of Performance Information

    TraitTrait--basedbased

    InformationInformation

    BehaviorBehavior--basedbased

    InformationInformation

    ResultsResults--basedbased

    InformationInformation

    JobJob

    Performance?Performance?

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    7/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 117

    Potential Performance Criteria ProblemsPotential Performance Criteria Problems

    ObjectivityObjectivity

    DeficiencyDeficiency ContaminationContamination

    PerformancePerformance

    CriteriaCriteria

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    8/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 118

    Performance StandardsPerformance Standards

    Performance Standards Expected levels of performance

    Benchmarks

    Goals

    Targets

    Characteristics of Well-defined Standards

    Realistic

    Measurable

    Clearly understood

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    9/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 119

    Terms Defining Standards on One CompanyTerms Defining Standards on One Company

    Figure 112

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    10/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1110

    Uses of Performance AppraisalUses of Performance Appraisal

    Performance Appraisal (PA) The process of evaluating how well employees

    perform their jobs when compared to a set ofstandards, and then communicating the information

    to employees. Informal Appraisal

    Day-to-day contacts, largely undocumented

    Systematic AppraisalFormal contact at regular time intervals, usuallydocumented

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    11/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1111

    Uses of Performance Appraisal (contd)Uses of Performance Appraisal (contd)

    PerformancePerformance

    AppraisalAppraisal

    Giving PerformanceGiving Performance

    FeedbackFeedback

    Administering WagesAdministering Wages

    and Salariesand SalariesIdentifying StrengthsIdentifying Strengths

    and Weaknessesand Weaknesses

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    12/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1112

    Uses of Performance Appraisal (contd)Uses of Performance Appraisal (contd)

    Criticisms of Performance Appraisal Focus is too much on the individual and does little

    to develop employees.

    Employees and supervisors believe the appraisal

    process is seriously flawed. Appraisals are inconsistent, short-term oriented,

    subjective, and useful only at the extremes ofperformance.

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    13/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1113

    Conflicting Roles for Performance AppraisalConflicting Roles for Performance Appraisal

    Figure 113

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    14/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1114

    Typical Division of HR ResponsibilitiesTypical Division of HR Responsibilities

    for Performance Appraisalfor Performance Appraisal

    Figure 114

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    15/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1115

    Who Conducts AppraisalsWho Conducts Appraisals

    Supervisors who rate their subordinates Employees who rate their supervisors

    Team members who rate each other

    Outside sources Employees self-appraisal

    Multisource (360 feedback) appraisal

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    16/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1116

    Traditional PerformanceTraditional Performance

    Appraisal:Appraisal:

    Logic and ProcessLogic and Process

    Figure 115

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    17/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1117

    Employee Rating of ManagersEmployee Rating of Managers

    Advantages Helps in identifying

    competent managers

    Serves to make managersmore responsive to

    employees Can contribute to the

    career development ofmanagers

    Disadvantages Negative reactions by

    managers to employeeratings

    Subordinates fear of

    reprisals may inhibit themfrom giving realistic(negative) ratings

    Ratings are useful only forself-improvement purposes

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    18/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1118

    Team/Peer RatingsTeam/Peer Ratings

    Advantages Helps improve the

    performance of lower-rated individuals

    Peers have opportunity to

    observe other peers. Peer appraisals focus on

    individual contributions toteamwork and teamperformance.

    Disadvantages Can negatively affect

    working relationships.

    Can create difficulties formanagers in determining

    individual performance. Organizational use of

    individual performanceappraisals can hinder thedevelopment of teamwork

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    19/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1119

    Multisource AppraisalMultisource Appraisal

    Figure 116

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    20/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1120

    Performance AppraisalMethodsPerformance AppraisalMethods

    Figure 117

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    21/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1121

    Category Rating MethodsCategory Rating Methods

    Graphic Rating Scale A scale that allows the rater to indicate an

    employees performance on a continuum. Job criteria scales

    Behavioral scales Drawbacks

    Restrictions on the range of possible rater responses

    Differences in the interpretations of the meanings of

    scale items and scale ranges by raters

    Poorly designed scales that encourage rater errors

    Rating form deficiencies that limit the effectiveness of

    the appraisal

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    22/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1122

    Category Rating Methods (contd)Category Rating Methods (contd)

    Checklists A performance appraisal tool that uses a list of

    statements or work behaviors that are checked byraters.

    Can be quantified by applying weights to individual

    checklist items.

    Drawbacks

    Interpretation of item meanings by raters

    Weighting creates problems in appraisal interpretation

    Assignment of weights to items by persons other than

    the raters

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    23/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1123

    Sample Performance Appraisal FormSample Performance Appraisal Form

    Figure 118a

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    24/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1124

    Sample Performance Appraisal FormSample Performance Appraisal Form

    Figure 118b

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    25/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1125

    Comparative MethodsComparative Methods

    Ranking Listing of all employees from highest to lowest in

    performance.

    Drawback

    Does not show size of differences in performancebetween employees

    Implies that lowest-ranked employees are

    unsatisfactory performers.

    Becomes an unwieldy process if the group to be

    ranked is large.

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    26/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1126

    Comparative Methods (contd)Comparative Methods (contd)

    Forced Distribution Performance appraisal method in which ratings of

    employees are distributed along a bell-shapedcurve.

    Drawbacks Assumes a normal distribution of performance.

    Resistance by managers to placing individuals in the

    lowest or highest groups.

    Providing explanation for placement in a higher or

    lower grouping can be difficult.

    Is not readily applicable to small groups of employees.

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    27/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1127

    Forced Distribution on a BellForced Distribution on a Bell--Shaped CurveShaped Curve

    Figure 119

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    28/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1128

    Narrative MethodsNarrative Methods

    Critical Incident Manager keeps a written record of highly favorable

    and unfavorable employee actions.

    Drawbacks

    Variations in how managers define a critical incident Time involved in documenting employee actions

    Most employee actions are not observed and may

    become different if observed

    Employee concerns about managers black books

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    29/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1129

    Narrative Methods (contd)Narrative Methods (contd)

    Essay Method Manager writes a short essay describing an

    employees performance.

    Drawbacks

    Depends on the managers writing skills and theirability to express themselves.

    Field Review

    Outside reviewer interviews the manager about the

    performance of each employee and develops arating for the employees from the interview notes.

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    30/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1130

    Behavioral/Objective MethodsBehavioral/Objective Methods

    Behavioral Rating Approach Assesses employees behaviors instead of other

    characteristics

    Consists of a series of scales created by:

    Identifying important job dimensions Creating statements describing a range of desired and

    undesirable behaviors (anchors)

    Types of behavioral scales Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)

    Behavioral observation scales (BOS)

    Behavioral expectation scales (BES)

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    31/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1131

    Customer Service Skills (BOS)Customer Service Skills (BOS)

    Figure 1110

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    32/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1132

    Management by ObjectivesManagement by Objectives

    Management by Objectives Specifying the performance goals that an individual

    and his or her manager agree to try to attain withinan appropriate length of time.

    Key MBO Ideas Employee involvement creates higher levels of

    commitment and performance.

    Encourages employees to work effectively toward

    achieving desired results. Performance measures should be measurable and

    should define results.

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    33/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1133

    The MBO ProcessThe MBO Process

    Job Review and AgreementJob Review and Agreement

    Development of Performance StandardsDevelopment of Performance Standards

    Guided Objective SettingGuided Objective Setting

    Continuing Performance DiscussionsContinuing Performance Discussions

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    34/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1134

    Common Rater ErrorsCommon Rater Errors

    Figure 1111

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    35/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1135

    Feedback as a SystemFeedback as a System

    Action Based onAction Based on

    EvaluationEvaluation

    DataData

    EvaluationEvaluation

    of Dataof Data

    FeedbackFeedback

    SystemSystem

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    36/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1136

    Appraisal Interview HintsAppraisal Interview Hints

    Figure 1112

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    37/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1137

    Performance Appraisals and the LawPerformance Appraisals and the Law

    Legally Defensible PA System Appraisal criteria based on job analysis

    Absence of disparate impact and evidence of validity

    Formal evaluation criterion that limit managerial

    discretion Formal rating instrument linked to job duties and

    responsibilities

    Personal knowledge of and contact with ratee

    Training of supervisors in conducting appraisals Review process to prevent undue control of careers

    Counseling to help poor performers improve

  • 8/8/2019 HRM10eChap11

    38/38

    2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 1138

    Performance Management SystemPerformance Management System

    Effective PMS systems are: Consistent with the strategic mission of the

    organization

    Beneficial as development tool

    Useful as an administrative tool Legal and job-related

    Viewed as generally fair by employees

    Effective in documenting employee performance