human capital (hc) business services assessment … aeronautics and space administration human...

31
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Capital (HC) Business Services Assessment (BSA) Implementation Plan NASA Advisory Council (NAC) Institutional Committee November 2, 2016 www.nasa.gov

Upload: vohuong

Post on 07-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Human Capital (HC) Business Services Assessment (BSA)Implementation Plan

NASA Advisory Council (NAC) Institutional Committee November 2, 2016

www.nasa.gov

Table of ContentsTopic Page(s)

§ Activities from Decisions to Plan Approval 3-4

Overview 5-7

Current State 8

Strategic Workforce Planning 9-11

Recruitment 12-13

Hiring 14-15

Classification/Staffing 16-18

Executive Resources 19-20

Early Career 21-22

Supervisors 23-24

Talent Development 25-26

Organizational Development 27-28

Inter/Intra-Center Collaboration 29-31

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

2

Activities from Decisions to Plan Approval

Dates ActivityFeb 2-4 HC Leadership Team F2F @ HQFeb 4 MSC DecisionsFeb 8 – May 13 Implementation Plan DevelopmentFeb 17 HQ Center VisitFeb 18 LARC Center VisitFeb 22 GSFC Center VisitMar 1 GRC Center VisitMar 2 KSC Center VisitMar 8 JSC Center VisitMar 15 – 16 HC Leadership Team F2F @ KSCMar 29 ARC Center VisitMar 30 AFRC Center VisitApr 5 MSFC Center VisitApr 7 SSC/NSSC Center Visit

3

Activities from Decisions to Plan Approval

Dates ActivityMay 16 – May 19 • HC Steering Committee Review/Consolidation of Team PlansMay 23 – Jun 3 • HC Community & BSSC review of draft PlanJun 1 • HC Leadership Team F2F @ HQJun 6 – Jun 10 • Plan RevisedJun 9 • Adobe Connect Session with HR CommunityJun 13 • HC Implementation Plan to BSSC/BSA POCs for reviewJun 21 – Jun 22 • Adobe Connect Session with BSA POCs/HR DirectorsJun 22 – Jun 28 • Plan RevisedJun 28 • Charts & Plan to BSSC and Agency Council Staff (ACS)Jul 21 • MSC for Approval

4

OverviewBack to Basics

• Current state:

o Existing tension between compliance with law and regulation and striving for superior customer service, at times contributing to inconsistencies in how operational HR Programs are managed

OHCM has the responsibility to uphold the integrity of NASA’s HC Program by ensuring that all HR offices comply with all laws and federal regulations that govern merit systems principles. Inconsistent practices are negatively impacting the integrity of the Agency’s HC Program, resulting in an increase in failed external audits and the need for Agency level oversight of Center HC Programs.

o

o

• OHCM has prioritized “getting back to the basics” as an overarching goal; the BSA is a natural leverage point to help NASA’s HC community develop greater consistency in its HR practices.

HC Transformation• The actions in this implementation plan are the first steps in a long process of fundamentally transforming how

HR services are delivered at NASA. The ultimate goal is to operate more as an enterprise community, leveraging strengths and resources across Centers, consolidating certain activities, and ensuring compliance while still delivering excellent products and services to our customers. This plan addresses eight decision areas identified by the MSC as opportunities to gain efficiencies and consistency across NASA’s Centers in NASA’s HC Program.

5

Overview The Plan

• Individually,eachoftheseimplementationplansareboldandfar-reaching. Collectively,therecommendedactionsaresomassivethatifdonesimultaneously,theycouldquitepossiblyhaveanegativeimpactonNASA’sculture,employees,andparticularlysupervisors.

Thedraftimplementationplanisanintentionallymeasuredapproachtotheeightdecisionareas,phasingindividualactionsto ensurethatwearemakingpositiveprogresstowardstheintendedoutcomesofeachdecisioninawaythatisaggressivebutnotdisruptive.

Forsomeareas,theimplementationplancoversthefullscopeoftheMSCdecision.Forothers,wehaveprioritizedactivities,capitalizingintheneartermonthoseactivitieswebelievewillhavethemostimpactandpushingoutothersthatareeitherlessimpactful,notasurgent,orcouldbecomeirrelevantoncethepositiveimpactoftheinitialactionsisrealized.

TheseinitialrecommendedactionsleverageongoingworkandcatalyzefurthertransformationforNASAtobeatthecuttingedgeofHCintheFederalgovernment.

Diversity&Inclusion• MuchliketheNASAvaluesofSafety,Excellence,TeamworkandIntegrityserveasthefoundationforeverythingwedo

atNASA,theprinciplesofDiversityandInclusion(D&I)asstatedinNASA'sD&I StrategicImplementationPlanserveasthefoundationofOHCM'sapproachtoHCmanagement.

Specifically,OHCM'simplementationapproachseekstosupportNASA'sD&I StrategicImplementationplaninsupportoftheD&I Frameworkto:

o FullyintegratediversityandinclusionintothestrategicdecisionmakingoftheAgencytoenhanceorganizationaleffectiveness,helpachievemissiongoals,andmeetthechallengesthatlieahead.

Strategicallyutilizeandexpandworkforcetalents,skills,andopportunitiestomaximizeindividualpotentialandproductivityAgencywide.

RepresentativesfromODEOparticipatedonmanyoftheHCBSAImplementationPlanningteams, andOHCMwillensurethatD&Iprinciplesareembeddedwithintheimplementationoftherecommendations.

o

o

6

Overview

AA OHCMImplementation

OfficialDevelop Teams

Teams

Include SMEs, Customers,

Supporters, and Skeptics

Decision 1: Strategic

Workforce Planning

Decision 2a: Recruitment

Decision 2b: Hiring System

Decision 3ab: Classification &

Staffing

Decision 3c: Executive Resources

Decision 4: Early Career

Decision 5: Supervisors

Decision 6: Talent

Development

Decision 7: Organizational Development

Decision 8: Inter/Intra-

Center Collaboration

Human Capital

Steering Committee/Stakeholder

Review

Implementation Plan

MSC Approval

Implementation

7

Current State

§ Focus on Change LeadershipBSA is the beginning of a larger transformationMade some shifts from our original plan

§

§§ Hiring/Staffing and Classification – realigned so that hiring

and staffing are one integrated project, independent of the classification decisionEarly Career – having conversations with labor about team involvementSupervisors – delaying some aspects of this implementation due to OHCM and AAO resourcesTalent Development – delaying virtual assessment piece of decisionInter/Intra-Center Collaboration – may be impacts from Budget BSA decisions

§

§

§

§

8

Decision #1 – Strategic Workforce PlanningAssumptions

TheAdministrator’sSuitewillprovidestrategicguidancefortheworkforceplanningprocesstoincludedeterminationsontheroleofthecivilservant,Centertechnicalandprogrammaticworkroles,andCentermissionsupportworkroles.

TheOHCMprogramleadwillbecloselyintegratedwithanAgencyStrategicIntegrationlead.

TheStrategicWorkforcePlanning(SWP)processwillprovidestrategicguidanceandcontexttoexistingworkforceplanningactivitiesbutwillnotbeadescriptionofallelementsofaworkforceplanningfunction.

EndState

What’sNew

ClarifiedexpectationsforMissionsandCentersastothetypeofworktobeperformedin-houseandwhatservicesandcapabilitiestheAgencylookstoeachCentertoprovide.Theseexpectationsreflectthe“workdemand”assignedbyMissionstoCentersandtakesintoaccountthe20-yearviewaswellasshorter-termneeds.

AframeworkforMissionsandCenterstousefordeterminingtheroleofcivilservantsascomparedtoothersectorsofworkforce.

Determinationoflong-termworkforcerequirementsofCenterstodetermineifandhowtoresizeandreshapetheworkforcesupply,particularlycivilservantswhorepresentlong-terminvestments.

Identificationofdemographicgoalsforthecivilserviceworkforcesupplytosupportthelong-termhealthofthatworkforce.

IntegratedAgency-wideworkforceplanthatiscommunicatedtostakeholdersandconnectedtoAgencyHumancapitalprogramswhererelevant

9

Decision #1 – Strategic Workforce PlanningEndState(cont.)

What’sGoingAway• Nothing isgoingaway.Instead,thisprocessenhanceshowNASAcurrentlydoesworkforceplanning

WhatStays• Programmaticworkforceplanning(e.g.,PPBEFTEallocationsandbudgetformulationprocesses)

Operationalworkforceprocesses(e.g.,assigningemployeestoprojectwork,hire/lossFTEphasing)

Centerceilingdistributionprocess

••

10

Decision #1 – Strategic Workforce PlanningMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• DevelopmentofguidancedocumentsontherolesoftheNASAcivilservant,Centertechnicalandprogrammaticwork,

Centerbusinessservices/missionsupportwork,andworkforcesizeandmixguidance

Agencystakeholdersupdatetheguidancedocumentstoreflectdecisionsduringtheyear(e.g.,Centerworkrolesorcapabilities)andchangesinmissioncontent.ThisisledbyAA/DAAwithsupportfromOHCMandOCFO,vettedintheASIPandbriefedtotheEC.

TheAgencywillusetheASIPandPPBEprocessestoworkthroughdisconnectsbetweenCenterworkexpectationsandMissionDirectorateplansforworkassignments,withECservingasdecisionauthorityforanyunresolvabledifferences.

CreateanintegratedAgencypictureofworkforceatNASA

ProvideinputstoAgencyhumancapitalprograms– i.e.,annualAgencyrecruitingplans,useofhiringauthorities,vettingbuyoutplans,etc.

MeasureperformanceofCentersinreshapingtheirworkforcetomeettherequirementsaspresented

••

•WorktobeCompletedinCY2017

• CentersdeveloporupdateCenterWorkforceMasterPlans.

WorkingwithOHCM,AAperformsaquarterly“check-in”onprogressinareassuchashiringactualscomparedtoplansorprogressinalteringdemographicsduringtheBaselinePerformanceReview(BPR)meetings

OHCMwillconductanassessmentofprogresscomparedtothestrategicguidanceinpreparationforreviewandupdatesofguidanceforthenextcycle,leadingbacktothenextyear’sPhase1activities

FutureWork▪ OHCMwillconductannualassessmentandupdatetheprocessasnecessary

11

Decision #2a – RecruitmentAssumptions

• EveryonebuysintoAgencyrecruitmentvs.Centerrecruitment

CentersarewillingtotakeanAgencyapproachandrecruitforworkatotherCenters•

EndState

What’sNew• AnAgency-widedigitalrecruitmentstrategythatincorporatesinnovativeandbestpracticestoattractadiversetalentpool

AnAgency-wideemployerbrandingframeworkandrelatedmaterialsthatalignwithOfficeofCommunications(OCOM)strategicprioritiesArestructuredandupdatedrecruitment/NASAjobswebsitethathighlightstheNASAemployerbrandandjobssupportingAgency-widemissions,asopposedtoCenter-specificwork.AdifferentiationbetweengeneraloutreachactivityandoutreachactivitythatisfocusedspecificallyonrecruitmentBetterrecruitmenteventcoordinationbetweenCenters,whererecruitersrecruitfortheAgencyvs.aspecificCenterProfessionalizingtherecruitmentdisciplineacrosstheAgency,withdefinedsuccessmetricsandcleareraccountabilityforrecruitmentactivitiesandimpact

•••

What’sGoingAway• High-costeventswhichdonotprimarilyfocusonrecruitmentoutreach(note:thisdoesnotaffecteducationalorother

outreachactivityconductedinotherNASAoffices),Center-focusedrecruitmentactivitieswhichdonotsupportAgency-widerecruitmentneedsUseofNASAPeople.govasNASA’smaincareerspage

••

WhatStays• SomeCenterrecruitmentactivities

NASA’sRecruitmentCommunityofPractice•

12

Decision #2a – RecruitmentMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• AssessmentofcurrentNASARecruitmentActivitiesanddeterminationofbestandmostinnovativepractices

DevelopmentofanAgency-widedigitalrecruitmentstrategy,withsequentialmilestonesandactivitiesclearlydefinedDevelopmentofanAgency-widerecruitmenteventframework,whereCenterscoordinatewitheachotherforcoverageandthereisgreateraccountabilityandincentivetorecruitforpositionsacrosstheAgency

••

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• DevelopmentofanAgency-wideemployerbrandframeworkwithsupportingmaterials

ImplementationofanAgency-widedigitalrecruitment,closelycoordinatedwithNASA’sOfficeofCommunicationsandexpandeduseofsocialmediatoolssuchasLinkedInandGlassdoorAnupdatedNASACareerswebsite,locatedatwww.nasa.gov/careersDevelopmentofamoreintegratedCommunityofPractice,withcloserlinkstothestaffingandclassificationcommunity

••

FutureWork• CloserintegrationwithSWP,andthedevelopmentofanAgency-widerecruitmentstrategywhichdirectlylinkstothe

Agency’sstrategicworkforceplanPost-implementationplanassessment•

13

Decision #2b – HiringAssumptions

• Financialresourceswillbeavailabletoprocureanewapplication;supportthenecessarytraining,communicationsandchangemanagementforanextensiveimplementationeffort;andsupportpost-implementationeffortssuchasongoingoperationsandmaintenanceaswellaspolicyandprocessupdates

ThenewsystemmustmaintaincompliancewithexistingandfutureregulationsandguidancefromtheOfficeofPersonnelManagement(OPM).

Collaborationandcoordinationwiththeteamsimplementingtherecruitmentandstaffing/classificationdecisionsiscritical.

End StateWhat’s New

• A system with supported software that is flexible to meet the needs of HR staff and hiring managersA transparent and trusted process with defined roles and responsibilities for HR staff and hiring managers

More transparent functionality to enable HR staff and hiring managers the ability to view and track all phases of the hiring processPlanned lifecycle costs

Functional/operational support with ongoing system and process training

What’s Going Away• A skills based hiring tool that is NASA unique

Inability to transparently track and view all phases of the hiring process•

What Stays• Partnership between HR and hiring managers throughout the hiring process

14

Decision #2b – HiringMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• AssessmentofoptionsforResumixreplacement

Questions-basedapplicationdemonstrationstoassessfunctionalityofnewsystemoptions

DeliverbusinesscaseandrecommendationtoITCouncil(July29)

PrepareanddeliverfinalImplementationPlan(September30)

•••o Procurement:Assessvendor-specificimplementation

Technical:Identifyintegrationrequirements(system/process)

Communication:Defineandassessstakeholders

Change:Designintegrationandchangeapproaches

Training:Designtrainingplanandtimeline

Compliance:7120integration/securityrequirements

o

o

o

o

o

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• Acquireandimplementnewsystemwithaschedulethatisdevelopedincoordinationwiththestaffingconsolidationplan

Changemanagementandcommunicationtostakeholdersonnewsystem•FutureWork

• TBDdependentonsuccessfulimplementationandsufficientfunding

15

••

Decision #3a & b – Classification and StaffingAssumptions

OHCMmaintainsfunctionalauthority(i.e.,policyauthority)toreviewproposedclassificationandstaffingactionstoensureconsistencyacrosstheAgency.

CentersmaintainresponsibilitytocreatestaffingplansbasedoninputfromstrategicworkforceplanningCenterswillmaintainaconsulting/advisoryandcustomer-focusedengagementwithmanagersNASAwillassignHRstafftosupportthecentralizedbusinessmodel.Attritionwilldrivedecisionsregardingwherethefunctionisbesttobeperformed,attheNSSCorlocallyattheCenters,whileretainingapresenceatthecenter.

ActivitiesconsolidatedattheNSSCaredefinedasworksuitedforcentralization,meetingthecriteriabelow:

EfficientOperations– Routineworkthatisrepeatableandlendsitselftoastandardizedprocess;

Embracingthesharedserviceenvironment– Leveragingskillsacrosstheagencytoperformstaffingandclassificationwork;and

Synergies– Processthatisimprovedbyperformingtheworkinanintegrated,collaborativeway,leveragingNSSCcurrentservicesprovided.

Successofthisimplementationisdependentonthelevelofcooperation,communication,anddisciplineoftheleadershipandstakeholdersthatareengagedthroughouttheagency.

16

Decision #3a & b – Classification and StaffingEndState

What’sNew

• ConsolidationofmostStaffingandClassificationactivitiesatNSSC

GreateremphasisandtimeforconsultingbyCenterHRSpecialistsOpportunityforgreaterconsistencyandefficienciesgainedbystandardizedprocesses

NSSCwillbedelegatedlegalauthoritytoapprovestaffingandclassificationactions

•••

What’sGoingAway

• SomeinpersoninteractionwithHRSpecialistsperformingNSSC-designatedtasks

Centerdelegatedauthorityforstaffingandclassificationactions•WhatStays

• OHCMmaintainsfunctionalauthority

Centersmaintainstrategicworkforceplanningdecisionmakingauthority

Centersmaintainconsulting/advisoryandcustomerfocusedengagementwithmanagers

••

17

Decision #3a & b – Classification and StaffingMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• Establishdefinitionof“transactional”andidentifyroles/responsibilitiesofCentersandNSSC

Developflowchartstaffing/classificationprocessspecifyingrolesofOHCM,NSSC,Center&Manager

OutlineIntegratedDefinitiontasklisting(IDEF)

Updateauthorities,policies,procedures

IdentifyHRITteamfordevelopingrequirementsforsupportingtools

Standupastaffing/classificationcentralizationimplementationteam

DevelopNSSCtransitionplanandidentifyCenterforinitialrollout

DevelopandimplementChangeManagementStrategyandcommunicationplan

•••••••

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• Developtools/processestotrackactionsinrealtime

ImplementinitialCenterrolloutforClassification(earlyCY2017)

ImplementinitialCenterrolloutforStaffing(dependentonimplementationofhiringsystem) (lateCY2017)

ReviseNSSCtransitionplaninresponsetoinitialcenterrollout

DevelopCentertransitionplansforadditionalCentersandimplementinphasedapproach

••••

FutureWork• AllCenterswillhavetransitionedstaffing/classificationprocessesbyCY2018

Post-implementationplanassessment

OngoingProcessimprovementsincludingtrainingtogrowconsultantcapacity,PDstandardization,recertificationprocess

••

18

••

••

Decision #3c – Executive ResourcesAssumptions

ConsistencyofprocessfromCentertoCenterisnecessary

ProcessesshouldbestreamlinedatboththeAgencyandCenterlevelstoreduceself-imposedrequirementsandretainahigh-levelofcustomerserviceConfidentialityandcredibilityoftheExecutiveResourcesCommunitytoassesswhatanexecutiveleaderneedsisimportant

SuccessionPlanningfortheExecutiveResourcesCommunityiscriticaltotheAgency

Currentprocessesgetthejobdonewithahighlevelofcustomerservice,butimprovementscanbemadeProcessimprovementscomplywithcurrentAgencyandFederalpolicies.

19

Decision #3c – Executive ResourcesEndState

What’sNew• Amorestreamlinedandconsistentprocess

What’sGoingAway• Centerspecificprocesses

WhatStays• Centeron-siteExecutiveResourcesguidance

MilestonesWorktobeCompletedinCY2016

• LeanSixSigmaExercisefortheExecutiveResourcesfunctionslistedabove

InterviewswithAgencyandCenterseniorleadership,HumanResourcesDirectors,andhiringmanagerstoassessthecurrentstatueandfutureneedsoftheERCommunityandtogettheirperspectivesregardingoptionstooperatetheERfunctionmoreefficiently.

BenchmarkingofotheragenciesandorganizationsforbestpracticesonhowtoeffectivelymanagetheERfunction.

DeveloprecommendationsformanagingtheExecutiveResourcesfunction.

••

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• Implementrecommendedapproach.

FutureWork• Assessandupdateprocessasnecessary.

20

Decision #4 – Early CareerAssumptions

• EarlyCareerisdefinedasnewhiresthatareGS-11andbelowandGS-12Ph.D.newhires

EndState

What’sNew• Aformal,Agency-wideearlycareernewhireonboardingprogram

ExpandingcurrentCenterfocusfornewemployeestoincludeAgencywidefocus

MandatoryparticipationbyeachEarlyCareernewhireinthisprogram

New“NASA101Handbook”focusedontheAgency

Agency-wideNewEmployeeOrientationforearlycareernewhiresVolunteerandcrossAgencyprojectopportunities

•••••

What’sGoingAway

• Center-onlyfocusednewemployeeexperience

WhatStays

• ExistingNSSCtrainingmaterials/introductoryvideosExistingcenter“bestpractices”,includingexistingorientationsandrotationalassignmentprograms•

21

Decision #4 – Early CareerMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• DevelopprocesstoidentifyallEarlyCareeremployeesacrosstheAgencyonaquarterlybasis

Designandhostquarterly“AskMeAnything”(AMA)-styleeventswithearlycareeremployees

Developandbeginhostingmonthly,virtual“brownbag”sessions

••

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• ReviewandupdatetheEmployeeOrientation.nasa.govwebsite,specificallytheNASAOverviewsection

Develop“NASA101Handbook”andposttoEmployeeOrientation.nasa.govsite

DevelopandhostquarterlyEarlyCareerOrientationsessionsthatwillrotatebetweenCenters

Provideinnovationtrainingtoallearlycareernewhires

ContinuetohostquarterlyAMA-styleeventswithearlycareeremployees

••••

FutureWork• Developandimplementjobrotationrequirement

Implementvolunteerandcrossagencyprojectopportunities

Developandimplementprocessforcross-centermentoring

Post-implementationplanassessment

•••

22

Decision #5 – SupervisorsAssumptions

• ImplementationwillincludeupdatingassociatedNPRsandNPDstounderscoreaccountability.

SPACEwillcontinuetobeusedastheautomatedperformancemanagementsystem,itcanbemodified,andfundingwillbeavailableforanyrequiredmodifications.

TheNASAculturewillshifttoonethatrecognizesandplacestheappropriateemphasisonsupervisionasadisciplineratherthananaddedtasktoatechnicalexpert

EndState

What’sNew• Agencyidentificationofcoresupervisoryskills

Jobannouncementlanguagewithemphasisonsupervisory/leadershipcapabilities

Structuredinterviewprocesswithemphasisonsupervisory/leadershipcapabilities

Probationaryperiodtrackinganddeliberatefollow-upforSupervisorypositions

Performanceplanelementlimitforsupervisorypositions(nomorethan4elements;2elementsrelatedtosupervisionandupto2technical/resultsdrivenelements)

••••

What’sGoingAway• Inconsistentsupervisoryjobannouncementswithlimitedfocusonleadershipskills

Non-standardsupervisoryinterviewprocess

Promotingtosupervisorypositionsbasedprimarilyontechnicalcapability

••

WhatStays• Agencyfocusonsupervisionasadiscipline

Commonsupervisoryperformanceelements(languagecontainedintheelementmaychange)

Abilitytousesupervisoryprobationperiods

••

23

Decision #5 – SupervisorsMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• Educatehiringofficialsonnewhiringandprobationaryperiodrequirementsforsupervisors

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• Finalizeandimplementguidanceoncoresupervisoryskills– shiftedfromCY2016

Finalizeandimplementvacancyannouncementlanguage– shiftedfromCY2016

Implementnewperformanceplanelementswith2017/2018EPCScycle– shiftedfromCY2016mid-term

Developprocessforsupervisoryprobationaryperiodmonitoring/tracking– shiftedfromCY2016

Developassociatedpolicyandimplementationguidance– shiftedfromCY2016

Finalizeandimplementstructuredinterviewprocess

Implementtrackingmechanismandimplementsupervisoryprobationaryperiodprocess

Updatesystems

•••••••

FutureWork• DevelopandimplementIDPprocessforsupervisorypositions

Post-implementationplanassessment

Providetrainingtoprojectleads,teamleadersandindividualswhoshowinterestinbecomingasupervisor

••

24

Decision #6 – Talent DevelopmentAssumptions

• CollaborativeeffortbetweenCFOandHRDsattheCenters

AllCenters,organizationsandprogramswillopenlysharetrainingexpenditures•

EndState

What’sNew• Trainingthatcanbeflexiblyre-alignedtomeetAgencyneeds.

AbilitytoestablishstandardtrainingmetricstoevaluatetraininginvestmentstodetermineROI

AstrategicapproachforvirtuallearningandalternatetrainingdeliverymethodsincollaborationwiththeOCIO

Astrategicmanagementapproachfortheoverallmanagementordirectionoftrainingprograms

Datatoindicatethe“truecost”oftraining

••••

What’sGoingAway• Unnecessaryduplicationoftrainingprocurements

WhatStays• Centertrainingallocations

25

Decision #6 – Talent DevelopmentMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• Developmentofcomprehensivedeepdivetemplate

PartnershipwithOCFOcommunitytocollectfinancialdata

CollectionandanalysisofDeepDiveData

••

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• Establishmentofassessmentapproachforvirtualtraining– shiftedfromCY2016

CompletionofZeroBasedReview(ZBR),toincludevirtualtrainingassessment

Recommendationoffuturemanagementapproachforoverallleadershipoftrainingprograms

••

FutureWork• TBD

26

Decision #7 – Organizational DevelopmentAssumptions

• TheapproachtomanagingOrganizationalDevelopment(OD)asanAgencycapabilitywillultimatelyrequiredeploymentofsomeCenterresourcestosupportAgencyneeds.

EndState

What’sNew• SharingODresourcesacrossCenterstomeetAgencyandCenterODpriorities

AconsistentapproachtosourcingexternalODresources

AconsistentapplicationofODtoolsandpracticesacrosstheCenters

••

What’sGoingAway• PrimaryfocusonCenterODpriorities

ImbalanceofODresourcesacrossCenters•WhatStays

• On-siteODpresenceateachCenter

ExistingCenterpromisingpracticesandcontinualdevelopmentofinternalODpractitioners•

27

Decision #7 – Organizational DevelopmentMilestones

WorktobeCompletedinCY2016• Establishassessmentexecutionteam

Developdatagatheringtemplate

DocumentinternalandexternalODresources(FTE,WYE,vendors,contracts)

CatalogODservicesateachCenter

Determinecurrentdemandforthecapability

DeterminetheneedforthecapabilityattheAgency,Center,andMission/Projectlevels

Identifypotentialchallenges/barrierstoeffectivelyleveragingCenter-baseODexpertiseasanintegratedcapability

Developcommunicationsstrategy

•••••••

WorktobeCompletedinCY2017• Determinebestuseofcurrentcapabilityagainstorganizationalneeds

Recommendasustainableandeffectiveagency-wideorganizationalconstruct

Recommendstrategicsourcingapproach

Beginoperatingasagencycapability

•••

FutureWork• Assessandadjustapproach

28

••

Decision #8 – Inter/Intra-Center CollaborationAssumptions

ThereisrecognizedandacceptedvaluetosharingemployeesacrossCenterstomaximizeeffectiveuseoftheAgency’sworkforceandtogiveemployeesanexpandedperspectiveoftheAgency.

TheAgencyrecognizesthattherewillbesomeimpacttolowerprioritytasksifresourcesarealignedthroughthisprocesstothehighestprioritytasks.

Anyidentifiedtaskshavecorrespondinglaborandtravelfunding,andFTEceilingissuesforsendingandreceivingorganizationsareaddressed

TheAgencyintendstocontinuetofunctionpredominantlyinamatrixmanagementmodelinregardstomissionexecution,wheremissions/programs/projectsareresponsibleforthemissiondefinitionandfunding,andtheCenters/lineorganizationsareresponsibleforexecutionandstaffing.Locallineorganizationsaretheconduittothebroadernetworkofcapabilityproviders.

Thereceivingandsupplyingorganizationsagreeonthescopeandprioritizationoftheneed.

Laborhasbeenfullyengagedintheproposedprocessandprogram

Thereisaclearprocesstodeterminerelativeprioritiesbetweentasksacrossprojects,missiondirectorates,andtheAgency,withrespecttoallocationofFTEresources.

29

Decision #8 – Inter/Intra-Center CollaborationEndState

What’sNew• Nearterm

o Anewformally-statedpolicyofsharingworkforceacrosscenterstomeetshorttermrequirements

Establishedcohortsofdisciplineleads/branchmanagersacrosscentersworkingtogethertoshareresourcesacrosscenters.

Agency-levelguidanceregardingmitigationofperceivedfinancialandlaboraccountingbarriers

o

o

• Longterm

o Anexpandedweb-basedsystemavailableacrossallcenterstocommunicateopportunitiesagencywideandtoestablishstandardizedmemorandumsofunderstanding(MOUs)onceamatchhasbeenidentified.

IdentificationofpointsofcontactwithinHRtoassistthereceivingandsupplyingsupervisorsaswellastheemployeeperformingthework.

Anagency-managed,missionfunded,travelwedgeasaninvestmenttoencourageworkacrosscenters.

Performanceindicatorsthatrewardcross-centercollaboration.

Aninter/intra-centercollaborationaward(monetaryorother).

o

o

o

o

What’sGoingAway• Thepracticeofusingprocurementmoneytosupplementworkforceneedsnotavailablelocallybeforelookingforcivil

serviceexpertiseinsideNASA

Non-standardpracticesofannouncingjoborrotationalopportunitiesacrossNASA•WhatStays

• Existingcircumstanceswherethesebehaviorsarealreadybeingdemonstrated

30

Decision #8 – Inter/Intra-Center CollaborationMilestonesWorktobeCompletedinCY2016(Phase1)

• Leveragewhat'shappeningwithCentersandtheOCEinamoreintentional/integratedwaywhileamoreformalprocessisworked thatcanalignwiththenewstaffingmodelaswedefinewhatfolkswilldoinnewconsultantroles.

IssueamemofromtheAssociateAdministratorwithexpectationsaroundthistopic•WorktobeCompletedinCY2017(Phase2)

• Establishcohortsofdisciplineleads/branchmanagersacrosscenterstofacilitatesharingofresourcesacrosscentersduring yearofexecution– shiftedfromCY2016

DevelopwithCFOandOCE“mythbusters”aroundFTEceilingsandtime-charginginthecurrentWBSstructure– shiftedfromCY2016

Updateand/ordeveloppoliciesasneeded- – shiftedfromCY2016

Phase1workevaluatedtodeterminenextstepsforPhase2

Implementanagency-wide,web-basedtooltoenablemanagerswithopportunitiestoseekhelpfromtheirpeersatothercenters.

••••o Integratewithnewhiringsystemtoseeifopportunity“advertising”andtrackingcapabilityexists

Ifnot,workthroughtheAnnualCapitalInvestmentReviewprocessforrequirementsdevelopment,approval,andimplementationofagencyversionofNASAEmployeeTalentSearch(NETS)(aJSCdevelopedtoolthathelpsconnectemployeeswithopportunitiesattheCenter)

o

• PerformanceIndicatorsidentifiedandincorporated

HRFacilitatorstrainedandready

Travelwedgeavailable

Training/rolloutcompleted

Metrictrackinginitiated

Phase2rollout

Post-rolloutevaluation/lessonslearned

••••••

FutureWork(Phase3– Opportunitiesdirecttoemployees)

• Expandautomatedtooltoenableemployeestodirectlyseekassignmentsand/orjobopportunities

31