hypotheses influence of antagonism on drug action
DESCRIPTION
HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION. NULL HYPOTHESIS Effect on intestinal motility Acetylcholine = NSS= Acetylcholine + Atropine = Acetylcholine + Epinephrine ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS Effect on intestinal motility - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NULL HYPOTHESIS◦ Effect on intestinal motility
Acetylcholine = NSS= Acetylcholine + Atropine = Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS◦ Effect on intestinal motility
Acetylcholine ≠ NSS ≠ Acetylcholine + Atropine≠ Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
1
![Page 2: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Reject Null, Accept Alternative Hypothesis◦ Effect on intestinal motility
Acetylcholine ≠ NSS ≠ Acetylcholine + Atropine≠ Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
Ach > NSS > Ach-Epinephrine > Ach-Atropine
2
![Page 3: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Acetylcholine + Atropine
Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
Acetylcholine NSS
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
A 30 37 43 50 49 -- 45 --
B 39 63 72 52 62 36 51 87
C 74 34 26 42 39 35 6 --
D 74 78 53 52 72 72 47 46
* % DISTANCE TRAVELLED BY INDIA INK
3
![Page 4: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Anova: Single Factor (casualties included)
SUMMARYGroups Count Sum Average Variance
Ach+Atro 8 432.45 54.05625 430.0485Ach+Epi 8 390.07 48.75875 166.36Ach 8 365.45 45.68125 569.5229NSS 8 282.22 35.2775 945.6903
ANOVASource of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 1500.597 3 500.1991 0.947517 0.43103 2.946685Within Groups 14781.35 28 527.9054
Total 16281.95 31
4
F< F crit: Not statistically significant
![Page 5: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SUMMARY (casualties not included)
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Ach+Atro 8 432.45 54.05625 430.0485
Ach+Epi 8 390.07 48.75875 166.36
Ach 7 365.45 52.20714 266.9622
NSS 6 282.22 47.03667 660.2321
5
![Page 6: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Mean
% d
ista
nce
tra
velle
d b
y in
dia
in
k
Graph 1. Batch Mean of % distance travelled by the India ink in the 4 treatment groups
![Page 7: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Source of
Variation
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups
216.6829 3 72.22764 0.198913 0.89613 2.991241
Within Groups
9077.793 25 363.1117
Total 9294.476 28
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (casualties not included)
*Significance level of 5%
INTERPRETATION: If F < Fcrit, Accept Null Hypothesis
7
![Page 8: HYPOTHESES INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISM ON DRUG ACTION](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56814f1d550346895dbcae94/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
F: 0.198913 F crit: 2.991241
◦ Since (F) < (Fcrit) at α= 0.05 We fail to Reject Null Hypothesis Accept Null Hypothesis Effect on GI Motility:
Acetylcholine = NSS= Acetylcholine + Atropine= Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
8