iac 2013 - adr policy project resentation

17
CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS IAC-13- A6.8.1 Matteo Emanuelli | Tiffany Chow | Deva Prasad | Giulia Federico | Joshua Loughman Space Safety and Sustainability Project Group

Category:

Engineering


4 download

DESCRIPTION

It has become increasingly clear in recent years that the issue of space debris, particularly in low-Earth orbit, can no longer be ignored or simply mitigated. Orbital debris currently threatens safe spaceflight for both satellites and humans aboard the International Space Station. Additionally, orbital debris might impact Earth upon reentry, endangering human lives and damaging the environment with toxic materials. In sum, orbital debris seriously jeopardizes the future not only of human presence in space, but also of human safety on Earth. While international efforts to mitigate the current situation and limit the creation of new debris are useful, recent studies predicting debris evolution have indicated that these will not be enough to ensure humanity's access to and use of the near-Earth environment in the long-term. Rather, active debris removal (ADR) must be pursued if we are to continue benefiting from and conducting space activities. While the concept of ADR is not new, it has not yet been implemented. This is not just because of the technical feasibility of such a scheme, but also because of the host of economic, legal/regulatory, and political issues associated with debris remediation. The costs of ADR are not insignificant and, in today's restrictive fiscal climate, are unlikely/ to be covered by any single actor. Similarly, ADR concepts bring up many unresolved questions about liability, the protection of proprietary information, safety, and standards. In addition, because of the dual use nature of ADR technologies, any venture will necessarily require political considerations. Despite the many unanswered questions surrounding ADR, it is an endeavor worth pursuing if we are to continue relying on space activities for a variety of critical daily needs and services. Moreover, we can’t ignore the environmental implications that an unsustainable use of space will imply for life on Earth in the long run. This paper aims to explore some of these challenges and propose an economically, politically, and legally viable ADR option. Much like waste management on Earth, cleaning up space junk will likely lie somewhere between a public good and a private sector service. An international, cooperative, public-private partnership concept can address many of these issues and be economically sustainable, while also driving the creation of a proper set of regulations, standards and best practices.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION

IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

IAC-13-A6.8.1

Matteo Emanuelli | Tiffany Chow | Deva Prasad | Giulia Federico | Joshua Loughman

Space Safety and Sustainability Project Group

Page 2: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

04/11/2023CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION

IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS 2

• INTRODUCTION

• ASSESSMENT

• CONCLUSION

• Background• Policy and Legal Challenges• Economic Challenges

• Scorecard Method• Case Study

• Conclusion & Next Steps

Summary

Page 3: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

INTRODUCTION

Page 4: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

4IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• UN Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines (2007)

• Kessler Syndrome in LEO

• Necessity of ADR has been highlighted by many studies*

• At least 5 large objects deorbited per year

*Liou (2010)

BACKGROUND

Operational satellites6%

Decommissioned satellites, spent

upper stages and mission-related

objects38%

Debris originated from more than

200 in-orbit fragmentationss-

ince 196156%

Catalogued orbital population (US SSN)

Source: ESA

Page 5: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

5IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Ideally, passive (mitigation) and active (removal) means should be combined to face debris situation

However:• complicated Liability and Licensing• lack of Definition for space debris

Current International space law framework:• Space debris not even mentioned in Article IX Outer Space

Treaty (1967)• Liability Convention (1972) does not impose legal provision to

impose obligation on undertaking mitigation or removal actions• Liability can be mitigated by negotiations and compensations

but not doable in commercial framework• ITAR and others export control regulations

POLICY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES

Page 6: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

6IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Proposed actions to foster ADR:

• Agree on a shared definition of space debris• Definition of a pro-active legal regime to foster

public private partnership• Develop more accurate monitoring capabilities• Establish an independent organization to track,

store and share data about orbital debris• Develop SSA traffic management system

POLICY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES

Page 7: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

7IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

ECONOMIC CHALLENGES

ADR

Cost Value

Partially addressed by policy approaches (International tax, license on launch operations, removal fee, etc.). Need to identify risk, stakeholders and time horizon.

If Cost < Value and Cost < Cost of alternatives, then the activity should be pursued and the stakeholders would procure the service.

“Build it first” demonstrator would set baseline mission cost and create base for appropriate framework.

Page 8: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

8IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

National space agencies would cover development costs and by doing so, establishing procedures, pushing creation of appropriate policies that can be applied by economic forces. (e.g. Telecommunications satellites, launchers, space station)

Assuming a legal and policy framework for ADR, commercial objectives are:• Clearly identified value proposition for clearly defined

stakeholders• Modelling of risk to multiple assets over a time horizon• Identification of alternatives and trade study of those

options

ECONOMIC CHALLENGES

Page 9: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

ASSESSMENT

Page 10: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

10IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Objective and multidisciplinary method to assess ADR projects to identify potential successful candidates but also to suggest preferred solutions

• Different criteria• Select measures and weights

SCORECARD METHOD

Page 11: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

11IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• Policy, Legal, Technical and Economic Framework

• The method does not aim to provide a comprehensive description of viable ADR projects but to provide a simple and easy-to-use indicator to determine the overall value of the ADR projects analysed

SCORECARD METHOD

Page 12: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

12IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• Policy and Legal Framework• Nationality• Strategy• Type of Cooperation• Legal Framework• Possibility of Anti-Satellite Weapon Applicability

• Technical Framework• Technology Readiness Level (TRL)

• Economic Framework• Definition of Business• Estimated Cost per Mission (ECM)• Estimate Cost per kg Deorbited (ECD)

SCORECARD METHOD

Page 13: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

13IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• CleanSpaceOne• Swiss Space Center

project• Target: Swiss

nanosatellite• Technology still in

development• ADR demonstrator

mission in 2018• ~ €12 million

CASE STUDY

Source: EPFL

Page 14: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

14IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• Swiss Space Center is supported by national Ministry of Education but not included in the decision making process of the country

• Scorecard result: poor (7 out of 36 points available)

However:

Swiss Foreign-Policy Strategy 2012-2015 is based on the following fundamental principle, i.e. rule of law, universality, neutrality, solidarity and responsibility and stability implemented by way of international cooperation

Although Switzerland is not a spacefaring country, it looks like it could be a suitable country to start active debris removal initiatives, which deal with security and complicated legal issues

CASE STUDY

Page 15: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCLUSION

Page 16: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

CONCEPTUALIZING AN ECONOMICALLY, LEGALLY AND POLITICALLY VIABLE ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL OPTION 04/11/2023

16IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• Started exploring an economically, politically, and legally viable way forward for ADR concepts

• Proposed method of evaluation based on a scorecard applied then to a case study

• Detailed analysis of the economic factors to justify ADR missions

• Expansion of scorecard and new case studies will be considered.

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS

Page 17: IAC 2013 - ADR Policy Project resentation

THANK YOU!

04/11/2023

17