iaea international atomic energy agency seminar on governance of uranium production activities...
TRANSCRIPT
IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
Seminar on Governance of Uranium Production ActivitiesCopenhagen, Denmark
27-28 May 2014
Background to mining and concentrating uranium ore
Peter Woods Team Leader, Raw Materials and Resources Subprogramme
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, AustriaNuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section
IAEA
Uranium Production Cycle
• The Uranium Production Cycle (UPC) comprises all the activities involved in the production of natural uranium for use as fuel in nuclear energy production and similar applications.
• Simply described, it includes uranium exploration, feasibility studies, development of production facilities, mining and processing, decommissioning and remediation. Management of associated environmental issues is an integral part of the whole cycle.
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014 2
IAEA
Uranium Production Cycle
Re-use of land
Prospecting
Rehabilitation/ Remediation
Exploration
Decommissioning Feasibility
Transport Development
Processing & Production
Mining
Stewardship
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014 4
IAEA
Types of uranium deposits
• 15 Geological Types of Uranium Deposits* have been identified – some of the main ones of interest are:• Sandstone deposits (all over the word)
• Proterozoic Unconformity-related deposits (Canada, Australia)
• Polymetallic hematite breccia complex deposits (only Olympic Dam (Australia) – is currently producing U)
• Metamorphite deposits (all over the word)
• Intrusive deposits (e.g. Namibia, Greenland)
* proposed by IAEA 2012P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
5
IAEAExploration
Handover & Stewardship
Decommissioning & Remediation
Construction and Operation
Residues, Wastes & Impacts
Operational timeline for mine life cycle activities
Waste Mgt. Plan
Planning
Feasibility & development
Eng. Options
Site, Design & Const.
Mgt. Operation
Decom., Closure & Controls
Monitoring and Surveillance
Quality Assurance
Health and Safety
Regulatory Requirements
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
6
IAEA
Uranium Production
• In 2012 total world uranium production from mines was (WNA):58,394 tonnes U (68,847 t U3O8)
(~151 M lbs U3O8)
c.f. 2011 54,610 t U
c.f. 2010 53,663 t U
• Which represented ~88% of the demand of 65,908 t U for power generation (WNA 2012)
Kazakh yellowcake (uranium ore concentrate) Source: KazAtomProm
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
7
IAEA
Uranium Producing Countries
During the past 50 years commercially viable deposits of uranium have been extensively exploited in the following countries :
Kazakhstan (1) Canada (2) Australia (3) Niger (4)
Namibia (5) Uzbekistan (6) Russia (7) USA Ukraine China
South Africa Brazil India Czech Republic Romania Pakistan
Germany Madagascar Argentina France Portugal Gabon
Spain DR Congo Bulgaria Hungary Former East Germany
( ) indicates position in world production 2012
Many other smaller mines operated that were strategic, not economic
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
8
IAEA
2009 - 2012 Uranium Production (t U)
2012 production as U 58 394 tonnes
All data from World Nuclear Association
World Production (tonnes U)
Country 2009 2010 2011 2012
Kazakhstan 14 020 17 803 19 451 21 317
Canada 10 173 9783 9145 8999
Australia 7982 5889 5983 6991
Namibia 4626 4496 3258 4495
Russia (est.) 3564 3562 2993 2872
Niger 3243 4198 4351 4667
Uzbekistan (est.) 2429 2400 3000 3000
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
9
IAEA
The road to uranium production
• Uranium is where you find it
• Suitable policies and legal/regulatory arrangements need to developed, if not already established
• Social, regulatory, environmental, safety and security aspects should be considered at all stages of a project, from pre-exploration to development and eventual closure
• Financial aspects must also considered; no-one wants a company to go bankrupt part-way through a project
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
10
IAEA
First steps
• Desktop studies• Examination of regional data, government
reports, old exploration reports
• Non-invasive exploration methods• e.g. remote sensing data, aerial/satellite
photography, aerial geophysical surveys, simple land-based geophysical methods
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
11
IAEA
Exploration drilling
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
13
Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd
Heathgate Resources Ltd (Australia)
Cameco Resources Ltd (Australia)
Mesteña Uranium, LLC (USA)
IAEA
Feasibility, Planning and Design
• The economic feasibility is established after more detailed data collection on the ore body
• Also other data are collected for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment, including environmental, social and technical aspects
• Project is designed and plans drawn up• Early document show initial mine plan, etc.• Most projects do not develop exactly as
planned!
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
14
IAEA
Mining operations producing uranium as a by-product
Former uranium extraction plant at a phosphate fertiliser plant, Florida USA.
P.Waggitt
• Copper mining (Australia; formerly South Africa and the USA).
• Phosphate rock mining (and production of phosphoric acid) (USA)
• Gold mining (South Africa)
• Possibly in the future (e.g. Morocco, Jordan (phosphate), Finland (Ni-Zn), Chile, Zambia (Cu), Australia/Greenland (Rare Earth projects))
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
15
IAEA
Uranium Mining Methods – Open pit
Open pit / surface excavations• ~25% produced this way
currently
• Relatively large footprint at the surface
• Large stockpiles of waste rock, sub-economic ore and/or overburden
• Potential for waste water, drainage and seepage to cause environmental problems
• May be a possibility for in-pit disposal of tailings &/or waste rock
Above: Rössing U mine, Namibia, (P. Woods)
Below: McClean Lake, Canada (Areva)
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
16
IAEA
Other examples of Open Pits and a Processing Plant in cold climates
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
17
Above: Sue B Pit, Canada (Areva)
Above: an ARMZ pit in Russia (web)
Below: Talvivaara, Finland (IAEA file photo)
IAEA
Uranium Mining Methods – Underground
Underground mining•~30% of currently mined uranium production
•Much smaller waste rock production volumes, frequently very little at the surface
•Smaller infrastructure footprint at the surface
•May be possible to dispose of much of the waste underground as backfill in the workings
•Some processing may be possible underground, e.g. McArthur River Canada
Above: McArthur River uranium mine, Canada
Below: Rabbit lake mine, Canada (Cameco)
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
18
IAEA
In-situ Leach Mining (ISL)
•Sometimes may be called solution mining or ISR (in situ recovery)
• ~35% of world mined uranium was produced this way recently
•Can be acid or alkali leach solution
•Very small volume of waste generation
•Potential to produce waste sludges and evaporite salts of high specific activity but small volume, depending on details of the extraction process
•Limited surface disturbance
Top: Beverley ISL mine, Australia
Bottom: Straz ISL mine Czech RepublicP. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar
May 2014
19
IAEA
Uranium recovery from ore
• Crushing (not ISL)
• Grinding (not ISL or heap leach)
• Leaching – acid or alkaline
• Liquid-solid separation (not ISL or heap leach)
• Purification and concentration
• Adsorption (ion exchange) or solvent extraction
• Precipitation, drying (plus calcining at some large mines
• Packing & dispatchUranium mill, Ranger mine,
AustraliaP. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar
May 201420
IAEA
Uranium recovery (ISL)
ISL plant, Alta Mesa, USA
Part of ion exchange complex
Plant seen from public road (taken through fence)
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014
21
IAEA
Packing
• Product is called “yellow cake” but can be any uranium concentrate: UO4, U3O8, ADU, MgDU, uranyl peroxide etc
• These products may be coloured reddish, orange to yellow naturally; or dark green to grey or almost black when calcined (in a furnace)
• Packed in drums & shipped to conversion plant
Yellowcake in the packing
plant at Beverley (Heathgate Resources)
Calcined U3O8 (Cameco)
Yellowcake in drums, (Kazatomprom)
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen
Seminar May 2014
22
IAEA 23
Loading containers
Drums of U3O8 being loaded, Cameco
Yellowcake drums awaiting shipment, Czech Republic
Drum label, Australia
P. Woods - U general talk, Copenhagen Seminar May 2014