iccrts 2008 the response to hurricane katrina: a case study of changing c2 maturity

23
ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity James Moffat Dstl, Ministry of Defence, UK

Upload: hide

Post on 08-Jan-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity. James Moffat Dstl, Ministry of Defence, UK. NATO NEC C2 Maturity Model. Being Developed by NATO RTO SAS Panel WG 065 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

ICCRTS 2008

The Response to Hurricane Katrina:A Case Study of Changing C2

Maturity

James MoffatDstl, Ministry of Defence, UK

Page 2: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

NATO NEC C2 Maturity Model

• Being Developed by NATO RTO SAS Panel WG 065• Context: A coalition force composed of a number of contributing

entities – A ‘Complex Endeavour’– NATO military elements– NATO civilian elements– Non-NATO countries– Non-Government Organizations (NGOs)– Private Voluntary Organizations (PVOs)

Page 3: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

NATO NEC C2 Maturity Model

Conflicted C2

De-conflictedC2

CollaborativeC2

CoordinatedC2

De-conflictedOperations

IntegratedOperations

CoordinatedOperations

TransformedOperations

DisjointedOperations

AgileC2

Page 4: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

The C2 Approach Space

Page 5: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

De-conflicted C2

Page 6: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Coordinated C2

Page 7: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Collaborative C2

Page 8: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Agile C2

Page 9: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Hurricane Katrina

• ‘A Catastrophe on a par with the events of 11th Sept 2001’• Three authoritative reports supplied by the US• Examples observed of Maturity Levels from Conflicted C2 to

Agile C2, changing over time• Balance towards Conflicted C2 end of scale• Observed variables and transitions consistent with Maturity

Model

Page 10: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Outline

• US Emergency Structure

• Hurricane Katrina timeline

• Examples of C2 Maturity levels

– Change over time

• Summary

Page 11: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

US Emergency Structure

Page 12: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

President (POTUS)

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Interagency IncidentManagement Group

Homeland SecurityOperations Centre

Coordination ofFederal SupportTo States

Local – New Orleans

States

Joint Field Office

Request

Request:- Incident of National Significance

Response:- Major Disaster (Pull)- Emergency (Pull)- Catastrophe (Push)

- Federal Coordinating Officer- Coordinating Function- Objectives/Strategies/Plans- Priorities/Public Affairs

EVENT

US Emergency Structure

JTF KatrinaDoD

Katrina Specific

Page 13: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Hurricane Katrina Timeline

Page 14: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Thurs Aug 25

• Local emergency preliminary responses within each State

• First FEMA teleconference – Federal/State/Local

• Plans for evacuation and shelter

• FEMA initial pre-positioning

• Rapid needs and emergency response teams on alert

• Local private sector entities respond

• Maturity Level

– De-Conflicted C2 at Federal/State Level

– Conflicted C2 at Local level

• Separate Local responses

Page 15: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Sat Aug 27• Phase 1 of LA Emergency Evacuation Plan

– implemented and MS informed• LA and MS Departments of transportation linked

– Evacuation transportation plans coordinated• FEMA activates National Disaster Medical Systems teams• FEMA and FEMA regional HQs in TX and GA go to level 1• FEMA Mobile Emergency Response Support Detachment deploys to LA

from TX• Fed CO appointed (heads Joint Field Office)• LA and MS implement contra-flow traffic plans• LA and MS deploy personnel and pre-position resources• Fed emergency declared by Pres after request from Gov LA• Gov AL offers assistance to LA and MS• Maturity Level – Coordinated C2 at Federal/State level

– Limited linking of plans and actions

Page 16: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Mon Aug 29

• Storm hits– Huge damage to power, communications– Damage to infrastructure, transport, healthcare– Mayor of New Orleans could not communicate for 48-hrs

• LA and MS request Nat Guard assets from other States• Conflicting reports to Local/State/Fed level

– Inaccurate and incomplete information• Lack of situation awareness and Common Operational Picture (COP)

– Breaching of levees unclear• Impossible to establish functioning incident command centres• Some emergency responders did not respond• Search and Rescue begins

• Maturity Level – Conflicted C2 at Local level– Search and Rescue

Page 17: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Wed Aug 31

• LA and Fed working together to plan evacuation to other States• DoD, DoT, State

– local delivery of food, water – plan further evacuation activities from New Orleans

• No Federal active duty forces in the area– due to incorrect situational awareness

• Large crowds at Convention Centre– no food or water

• Search and Rescue– Evacuees deposited on high ground with no coordination or

unified command structure• Maturity Level

– Conflicted C2 at Local level• Search and Rescue

– Coordinated C2 in parts of Federal/State levels

Page 18: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Sat Sept 3

• Evacuation of Convention Centre starts– Food, water and medicine now available– 25,000 to be evacuated

• Superdome evacuation continuing• Maturity Level

– De-Conflicted C2 for evacuations• Between National Guard and Active Duty Forces via JTF

Katrina

Page 19: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Tue Sept 6

• Establishment of Law Enforcement Coordination Centre– Unified Command for Law Enforcement

• New Orleans Police, LA State Police, National Guard, Federal Law Enforcement

• Maturity Level– Collaborative C2 emerging

Page 20: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Agile C2

• The creation of ad-hoc clinics in downtown hotels was an agile and self-organised response to an awareness of the situation, and the need to adapt

• A unique example

Page 21: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Changing Maturity Levels - A Case History

• Conflicted C2 (initial stage post landfall)• Lack of situational awareness• Impossible to coordinate immediate emergency response

operations• Multiple rescue teams in the same area while other areas not

covered.• De-Conflicted C2 (Emerging during first few days post landfall)

• National Guards and active duty units deployed to different geographical areas

• Collaborative C2 emerging (By end of first week post landfall)• Complex and multifaceted C2 structure in place• Coordinating States, civilians, military at both State and

Federal level• JTF-Katrina command active units through task forces

Time

Page 22: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Bibliography

• ‘The Federal response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned’.

US Dept. of Homeland Security, Washington DC, USA, Feb 2006.

• L E Davis et al ‘Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned for Army

Planning and Operations’. RAND Arroyo Centre, Santa Monica,

CA, USA, 2007.

• ‘A Failure of Initiative: Final Report of the Select Bipartisan

Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to

Hurricane Katrina’ US House of Representatives, Feb 2006.

Page 23: ICCRTS 2008 The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of Changing C2 Maturity

Summary

• Examples were observed of changing C2 Maturity Levels ranging from Conflicted to Agile, during the build up to and immediate post landfall of Hurricane Katrina.

• The factors marking out these differing Maturity levels have been identified, and are consistent with the current NATO NEC C2 Maturity Model.

• In a slightly longer timeframe, the post landfall planning for the reconstruction of the Hurricane Protection System in New Orleans was an example of the Collaborative level of C2 Maturity.